DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Assessment for the Reintroduction of Fishers in Western Oregon, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Assessment for the Reintroduction of Fishers in Western Oregon, USA Feasibility Assessment for the Reintroduction of Fishers in Western Oregon, USA Prepared by Tim L. Hiller March 2015 Feasibility assessment for reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon, USA 2 This report completed in partial fulfillment of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperative Agreement Award F14AC00861. Suggested citation: Hiller, T. L. 2015. Feasibility assessment for the reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon, USA. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon, USA. Cover figure courtesy of Oregon Department of Wildlife (Oregon State Game Commission, Game Division, 1962 annual report). Feasibility assessment for reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon, USA 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. 4 OBJECTIVES OF THIS ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 9 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 11 HABITAT AVAILABILITY........................................................................................................ 12 Coarse-scale Habitat Availability ............................................................................................. 13 Fine-scale Habitat Assessment ................................................................................................. 14 PREY BASE ................................................................................................................................. 16 INTERSPECIFIC EFFECTS ........................................................................................................ 18 Interspecific Killing of Fishers ................................................................................................. 18 Potential Effects on Species of Concern ................................................................................... 21 POTENTIAL SOURCE POPULATIONS ................................................................................... 26 POTENTIAL REINTRODUCTION THREATS ......................................................................... 29 Land Management Decisions .................................................................................................... 29 Climate Change and Wildfires .................................................................................................. 37 Vehicle collisions ...................................................................................................................... 38 Incidental Harvest ..................................................................................................................... 39 Anticoagulant Rodenticides ...................................................................................................... 40 Risks of Small Populations ....................................................................................................... 41 Pathogens and Parasites ............................................................................................................ 42 LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................... 43 State........................................................................................................................................... 43 Federal....................................................................................................................................... 43 NECESSARY ELEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 45 POTENTIAL STAKEHOLDERS AND COOPERATORS ......................................................... 48 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 48 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................. 51 Feasibility assessment for reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon, USA 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals from various agencies and organizations provided assistance and expertise to help complete this assessment. Special thanks to Sue Livingston for drafting the Federal Regulations section, reviewing several drafts of the document, and assisting with several other aspects of the assessment; Steve Niemela for drafting the State Regulations section; Craig Thompson for drafting the section on anticoagulant rodenticides; Greta Wengert for drafting the section on interspecific killing of fishers; and Larry Reigel (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) for GIS support. Jeff Lewis provided background information, numerous helpful suggestions, and reviewed an initial draft of the assessment. Finally, thanks to all of the reviewers, as their efforts improved the quality and accuracy of this assessment. Inclusion of the names of contributors and reviewers does not necessarily imply endorsement of the contents of this assessment. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided funding to produce this document. Dr. Tim L. Hiller Forest and Wildlife Research Center Mississippi State University Mississippi State, Mississippi Email: [email protected] List of Contributors Sue Livingston U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office Portland, Oregon Steve Niemela Rogue Watershed District Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Central Point, Oregon Dr. Craig Thompson U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Fresno, California Dr. Greta Wengert Integral Ecology Research Center Blue Lake, California Feasibility assessment for reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon, USA 5 List of Reviewers (accepted invitation to review and returned comments) Dr. Keith Aubry Sue Livingston U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of the Interior Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office Olympia, Washington Portland, Oregon Josh Chapman Jamie E. McFadden-Hiller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest and Wildlife Research Center Forest Service Mississippi State University Pacific Northwest Region Mississippi State, Mississippi Portland, Oregon John Chatel Sean Mohren U.S. Department of Agriculture National Park Service Forest Service Crater Lake National Park Region 6, Threatened and Endangered Crater Lake, Oregon Species Program Portland, Oregon Joe Doerr Steve Niemela U.S. Department of Agriculture Rogue Watershed District Forest Service Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Willamette National Forest Central Point, Oregon Springfield, Oregon Dr. Dwayne Etter Michael Rochelle Wildlife Division Weyerhaeuser Company Michigan Department of Natural Resources Lebanon, Oregon East Lansing, Michigan Bruce Hollen Dave Vesely U.S. Department of Interior Oregon Wildlife Institute Bureau of Land Management Corvallis, Oregon Oregon/Washington State Office Portland, Oregon Dr. Jeff Lewis Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Olympia, Washington Feasibility assessment for reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon, USA 6 OBJECTIVES OF THIS ASSESSMENT The objective of this feasibility assessment is to review and evaluate available information on factors that could affect the success of a fisher reintroduction in western Oregon. The assessment area coincides with the Oregon portion of the proposed West Coast Distinct Population Segment (DPS) delineated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the proposed listing of fishers under the federal Endangered Species Act (federal ESA; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2014a,b). It includes all or portions of Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Tillamook, Wasco, Washington, and Yamhill counties (Fig. 1). Information about fishers in Oregon was given the highest priority in this assessment, but to fill in various knowledge gaps, it was necessary to also use information from California, Washington, and other areas. A reintroduction (a type of translocation) is, “…an attempt to reestablish a population where one no longer exists within a species’ historical range” (Lewis et al. 2012:2). Consequently, this assessment does not consider the potential consequences of augmenting either of the two extant populations of fishers in southwestern Oregon. A reintroduction of fishers in Oregon would be considered successful in the short term if it resulted in a viable population in the release area(s); it would be successful in the long term if it resulted in population persistence with the opportunity for connectivity with adjacent populations. Beyond assessing whether reintroduction of fishers in western Oregon is feasible, a formal feasibility assessment can have benefits such as increasing public awareness and garnering support of stakeholders, providing the foundation for an implementation plan, and initiating planning efforts for a complex reintroduction project that involves coordination among multiple government agencies and other groups (Berg 1982, Lewis et al. 2012). Although the audience
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lost in Coos
    LOST IN COOS “Heroic Deeds and Thilling Adventures” of Searches and Rescues on Coos River Coos County, Oregon 1871 to 2000 by Lionel Youst Golden Falls Publishing LOST IN COOS Other books by Lionel Youst Above the Falls, 1992 She’s Tricky Like Coyote, 1997 with William R. Seaburg, Coquelle Thompson, Athabaskan Witness, 2002 She’s Tricky Like Coyote, (paper) 2002 Above the Falls, revised second edition, 2003 Sawdust in the Western Woods, 2009 Cover photo, Army C-46D aircraft crashed near Pheasant Creek, Douglas County – above the Golden and Silver Falls, Coos County, November 26, 1945. Photo furnished by Alice Allen. Colorized at South Coast Printing, Coos Bay. Full story in Chapter 4, pp 35-57. Quoted phrase in the subtitle is from the subtitle of Pioneer History of Coos and Curry Counties, by Orville Dodge (Salem, OR: Capital Printing Co., 1898). LOST IN COOS “Heroic Deeds and Thrilling Adventures” of Searches and Rescues on Coos River, Coos County, Oregon 1871 to 2000 by Lionel Youst Including material by Ondine Eaton, Sharren Dalke, and Simon Bolivar Cathcart Golden Falls Publishing Allegany, Oregon Golden Falls Publishing, Allegany, Oregon © 2011 by Lionel Youst 2nd impression Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-9726226-3-2 (pbk) Frontier and Pioneer Life – Oregon – Coos County – Douglas County Wilderness Survival, case studies Library of Congress cataloging data HV6762 Dewey Decimal cataloging data 363 Youst, Lionel D., 1934 - Lost in Coos Includes index, maps, bibliography, & photographs To contact the publisher Printed at Portland State Bookstore’s Lionel Youst Odin Ink 12445 Hwy 241 1715 SW 5th Ave Coos Bay, OR 97420 Portland, OR 97201 www.youst.com for copies: [email protected] (503) 226-2631 ext 230 To Desmond and Everett How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic History of Siletzia, a Large Igneous Province in the Oregon And
    Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Wells, R., Bukry, D., Friedman, R., Pyle, D., Duncan, R., Haeussler, P., & Wooden, J. (2014). Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot. Geosphere, 10 (4), 692-719. doi:10.1130/GES01018.1 10.1130/GES01018.1 Geological Society of America Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Downloaded from geosphere.gsapubs.org on September 10, 2014 Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Ray Wells1, David Bukry1, Richard Friedman2, Doug Pyle3, Robert Duncan4, Peter Haeussler5, and Joe Wooden6 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-3561, USA 2Pacifi c Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 6339 Stores Road, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA 5U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4626, USA 6School of Earth Sciences, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall Mitchell Building 101, Stanford, California 94305-2210, USA ABSTRACT frames, the Yellowstone hotspot (YHS) is on southern Vancouver Island (Canada) to Rose- or near an inferred northeast-striking Kula- burg, Oregon (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment
    Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment Little Butte Creek Watershed Council August 2003 Abstract The Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment has been prepared for the Little Butte Creek Watershed Council with funding from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). The Assessment was prepared using the guidelines set forth in the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board’s 1999 Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The purpose of this document is to assess the current conditions and trends of human caused and ecologic processes within the Little Butte Creek Watershed and compare them with historic conditions. Many important ecological processes within the watershed have been degraded over the last 150 years of human activity. This Assessment details those locations and processes that are in need of restoration as well as those that are operating as a healthy system. The Assessment was conducted primarily at the 5th field watershed level, that of the entire Little Butte Creek Watershed. List and describe field watershed levels below. Where possible, the analyses was refined to the smaller 6th field watershed level, thirteen of which exist within the Little Butte Creek Watershed. The assessment also notes gaps in data and lists recommendations for future research and data collection. It is intended that this document, and the Little Butte Creek Watershed Action Plan be used as guides for future research and watershed protection and enhancement over the next decade. The document was developed using existing data. No new data was collected for this project. Where data was lacking, it was detailed for future work and study. Acknowledgements This assessment was compiled and written by Steve Mason.
    [Show full text]
  • Elliott State Forest: Next Step Considerations for Decoupling From
    ELLIOTT STATE FOREST Next Step Considerations for Decoupling from Oregon’s Common School Fund October 2018 An Oregon Consensus Assessment Report to the Oregon Department of State Lands and Oregon State Land Board 1 Assessment Team Peter Harkema, Oregon Consensus Director Brett Brownscombe, Senior Project Manager Amy Delahanty, Project Associate Acknowledgements Oregon Consensus deeply appreciates all those who generously gave their time to inform this assessment and report. About Oregon Consensus Oregon Consensus (OC) was established by state statute as the State of Oregon's program for public policy conflict resolution and collaborative governance. The program provides mediation and other collaborative services to public bodies and stakeholders who are seeking new approaches to challenging public issues. OC conducts assessments and designs and facilitates impartial and transparent collaborative processes that foster balanced participation and durable agreements. OC is housed in the National Policy Consensus Center in the Hatfield School of Government at Portland State University. Contact Oregon Consensus National Policy Consensus Center Hatfield School of Government Portland State University 506 SW Mill Street, Room 720 PO Box 751 Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9077 [email protected] www.oregonconsensus.org 2 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Purpose of report ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medford Area Geology Report
    ._.. April GEOLOGICAL NE1/lS - w..""'TTER 33 1948 GEOLOGY IN THE MEDFORD AREA. OREGON By Hollis M. Dole* This paper is a review of the geology of part of southwestern Oregon as worked out and mapped by Diller, Winchell, Wells, and Wilkinson.** The area described is of special interest because it affords an opportunity to observe the seldom exposed "basement" rocks of the Cascade Range. The geologic column of this area includes possible Proterozoic, Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and 0-enozoic rocks. The ee-nozoTc -rock-s- are represented in the rocks of the western Cascades and in the sediments and volcanics of Bear Creek and Rogue Ri ver valleys. The Mesozoic rocks occur along the southwestern edge of Bear Creek Valley and in isolated spots on the adjacent foothills. The oldest rocks are to the south and west of Medford in the Klamath geomorphic province, and they, in this area, are called the Siskiyou Mount~ . Old schists are found near the California line almost due south of Medford. These schists undoubtedly are some of the oldest rocks in Oregon, although there is no definite paleontological evidence to prove this. They consist of highly altered, crenulated and folded rocks, the most abundant of which are plagioclase­ hornblende schists. Sericite and graphitic schists are also common. The plagio­ clase-hornblende schists are interpreted as highly altered andesite or basalt flows, the sericite schists as altered dacite or rhyolite, and the graphitic schists as altered organic sedimentary rocks. The age of these rocks is Paleozoic or older, and their character indicates both volcanism in Oregon in earliest times and the existence of ancient seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cordilleran Section Meeting
    Vol. 51, No. 4 Cordilleran Section Meeting 15–17 May Portland, Oregon, USA www.geosociety.org/cd-mtg 115th Annual Meeting of the Cordilleran Section Geological Society of America Portland, Oregon, USA 15–17 May 2019 Oregon Convention Center Local Program Committee Meeting Co-chairs . Martin Streck, Jim O’Connor Technical Program . Matt Brunengo, Erick Burns, Anita Grunder Field Trips . Jason McClaughry, Clark Niewendorp, Bob Houston Workshops, Exhibits, and Student Volunteers . Frank Granshaw Sponsorship . Scott Burns GSA Cordilleran Section Officers 2018–2019 Chair . Michael Wells Vice Chair . Jeffrey Lee Past Chair . Susan M . Cashman Secretary and Accounting Officer . Calvin G . Barnes Student Representative . Jason Womer GSA Councilors . Nathan Niemi, Jeff Rubin, Wendy Bohrson Sponsors We are grateful to the following sponsors who have graciously contributed financial and logistical support . Association of Women Geoscientists The Paleontological Society Portland State University NOTICE By registering for this meeting you have acknowledged that you have read and will comply with the GSA Code of Conduct for Events (full code of conduct found on inside back cover) . If you have any concerns about behavior that may violate the Code, please contact: GSA Executive Director, Vicki McConnell, vmconnell@geosociety .org GSA Ethics and Compliance Officer, Nan Stout, gsaeventscode@gmail .com You may also stop by the registration desk or the GSA Bookstore to have the named individuals directly contacted via phone . 50% Total Recovered Fiber 30% Post-Consumer General Information Location about 250 feet west of the Holladay Lobby entrance. The The 115th Annual Meeting of the Cordilleran Section DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Portland is across the street from of the Geological Society of America will be held at the the Holladay Park MAX station, also served by the Red, Blue, Oregon Convention Center (OCC), Portland, Oregon, and Green Lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    Table Of Contents Conservation Toolbox............................................................................................................................... 3 Outreach, Education, and Engagement................................................................................................... 4 Voluntary Conservation Programs......................................................................................................... 16 Conservation in Urban Areas.................................................................................................................. 23 Planning and Regulatory Framework..................................................................................................... 30 General References.................................................................................................................................. 50 Conservation Toolbox Everyone has a role in the successful implementation of the Oregon Conservation Strategy. The Conservation Toolbox provides recommendations to support implementation and suggestions for additional information and assistance. Key components of the Conservation Toolbox include: Outreach, Education, and Engagement Conservation in Urban Areas Oregon’s Existing Planning and Regulatory Framework Voluntary Conservation Programs General References: additional resources outside of the references provided in each section Outreach, Education, and Engagement Connecting people to nature is an important element of successful Conservation Strategy implementation. Acquiring
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-21 Budget Highlights
    2019-21 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS Legislative Fiscal Office September 2019 State of Oregon Ken Rocco Legislative Fiscal Office Legislative Fiscal Officer 900 Court St. NE, Rm. H-178 Paul Siebert Salem, OR 97301 Deputy Legislative Fiscal Officer 503-986-1828 September 9, 2019 To the Members of the Eightieth Oregon Legislative Assembly: Following is the 2019-21 Budget Highlights, which provides summary information on the legislatively adopted budget; legislative actions affecting the budget; program areas and agencies; state bonding and capital construction; budget notes; information technology; fiscal impact statements; substantive bills with a budget effect; and appendices containing detailed data. We hope you find this resource useful and invite you to call the Legislative Fiscal Office if you have any questions. Ken Rocco Legislative Fiscal Officer Table of Contents Summary of the 2019-21 Legislatively Adopted Budget ............................................................. 1 Summary of Legislative Actions Affecting the Budget ............................................................... 33 Program Area Summaries .......................................................................................................... 58 State Bonding and Capital Construction .................................................................................. 117 Budget Notes ........................................................................................................................... 120 Information Technology..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re and Os Isotopes of the Central Oregon Cascades and Along the Arc Indicate Variable Homogenization and Mafic Growth in the Deep Crust
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 109 (2013) 345–364 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Re and Os isotopes of the central Oregon Cascades and along the arc indicate variable homogenization and mafic growth in the deep crust Mariek E. Schmidt a,⇑, Anita L. Grunder a,1, Michael C. Rowe a,2, John T. Chesley b,3 a Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97333, United States b Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States Received 2 May 2012; accepted in revised form 1 February 2013; available online 14 February 2013 Abstract The rhenium–osmium isotopic system has the potential to track the maturation of arc crust at lower crustal levels because the 187Os/188Os in magmas is sensitive to the age and composition of crust with which they interact. We here present Re and Os iso- topic data for a suite of samples from the extensional central Oregon Cascade arc that includes diverse, primitive (high Mg) bas- alts and low- and medium-K basaltic andesites from North Sister and Little Brother volcanoes. The basaltic andesites contain higher 187Os/188Os than the two most common basalt types, calc-alkaline basalt and low-K tholeiites (0.17–0.19 vs. 0.14– 0.15), indicating interaction with mafic crust. The evolution of 187Os/188Os in the deep crust depends on Re partitioning that in turn depends on sulfide and magnetite stability and oxygen fugacity. We estimate bulk mineral-melt partition coefficients for Re to be 4atfO2 QFM and 10 at fO2 +1 to +3 DQFM in keeping with near liquidus phase equilibria at deep crustal conditions (Mercer and Johnston, 2008) and on fO2 of central Oregon primitive magmas (Rowe et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mesozoic Or Early Tertiary Melanges in the Western Cascades of Washington
    Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Bulletin 77, 1987 129 LATE MESOZOIC OR EARLY TERTIARY MELANGES IN THE WESTERN CASCADES OF WASHINGTON Virgil A. Frizzell, Jr. U.S. Geological Survey 2255 North Gemini Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Rowland W. Tabor Robert E. Zartman Charles D. Blome U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road Denver Federal Center Denver Federal Center Menlo Park, California 94025 Denver, Colorado 80225 Denver, Colorado 80225 ABSTRACT Marine rocks west of the Straight Creek fault, from Snoqualmie Pass to the Pilchuck River, are highly deformed and varied in lithology. These rocks, referred to various formations or stratigraphic units by earlier workers, should be considered two lithologically distinct melange belts. Immediately west of the Straight Creek fault from the Weden Creek area to Snoqualmie Pass, the discontinuous melange of the eastern belt consists of strongly hornfelsed rocks including chert, metabasalt, graywacke, argiUite, marble, and ultramafic rocks. Marble near Skykomish yields Permian fusu1inids with Tethyan affinities. Zircons from tonalitic gneiss northwest of Skykomish are 190 million years old, and metagabbro near Snoqualmie Pass is 165 million years old. In the western foothills, the melange of the western belt consists of pervasively sheared argillite and graywacke studded with outcrop- to mountain-scale steep-sided phacoids of chert, limestone, pillow basalt, gabbro, and tonalite; ultramafic rocks are rare. Strikes of bedding and cleavage and trends of small fold axes are mostly north-northwest to north-northeast. Rare macrofossils in foliated sedimentary rocks and radiolarians in chert phacoids are Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous in age.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology As Destiny: Cold Waters Run Deep in Western Oregon
    PNW Pacific Northwest Research Station INSIDE The Geologic Divide . .2 The Allocation Challenge . .3 Dam the Consequences . .4 Land Use, Water, and Time . .4 Municipal Waters and National Forests . .5 FINDINGS issue forty-nine / december 2002 “Science affects the way we think together.” Lewis Thomas GEOLOGY AS DESTINY: COLD WATERS RUN DEEP IN WESTERN OREGON “Geology plays an extremely But a closer look reveals that the state has been blessed with a huge geological IN SUMMARY important and previously backup plan for water supply. unappreciated role in The summer of 2001 brought the “Contrary to popular belief, most summer determining flow regimes.” second-worst drought on record in flow out of the high Cascades is not due to Gordon Grant snowmelt. Instead, the high Cascades form Oregon, resulting in historically low a vast hydrologic sponge that stores many streamflows and reservoir levels, or most of the year, it just doesn’t decades worth of water as deep groundwa- seem like water is a problem in ter,” says Gordon Grant. “Recent analysis stressed aquatic ecosystems, and even F western Oregon. It’s a fixture, for of streamflow patterns, ranging in scale dramatic confrontations between irri- better or for worse. Few people, including from individual mountain streams to larger residents, fully appreciate that the warm, rivers such as the McKenzie, has revealed gators and federal resource agencies dry sunny weather of each summer actu- that geology plays an extremely important in the Klamath basin. These events ally constitutes a pretty reliable drought, and previously unappreciated role in deter- with serious implications for water mining flow regimes.” underscore the critical and growing management.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Cascade Range in Oregon
    Geology of the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Cascade Range in Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 449 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Oregon, Departtnent of Geology and Mineral Industries Geology of the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Cascade Range in Oregon By DALLAS L. PECK, ALLAN B. GRIGGS, HERBERT G: SCHLICKER, FRANCIS G. WELLS, and HOLLIS M. DOLE ·~ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 449 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries ,... UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director . -~ The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 56. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents,. U.S. Government Printing Office · · ·. Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Stratigraphy-Continued 1 Abstract------------------------------------------- Sardine Formation-Continued Introduction ______ --------------------------------- 2 Lithology and petrography-Continued Scope of investigation ______ - ___ - __ -------------- 2 Location, accessibility, and culture __ -------------- 2 Pyroclastic rocks __________ -- __ ---------'-- 33 Physical features ______ --_---_-_- ___ -----_------- 3 Age and correlation ____ - _--- __ -------------- 34 Climate and vegetation ___ --- ___ - ___ -----_------- 4 Troutdale Formation _____ ------------------------ 35 Fieldwork and reliability of the geologic
    [Show full text]