DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetic Research on Commercially Exploited Fish Species in Nordic Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genetic Research on Commercially Exploited Fish Species in Nordic Countries Genetic research on commercially exploited fish species in Nordic countries Jens Olsson, Teija Aho, Ann-Britt Florin, Anssi Vainikka, Dorte Bekkevold, Johan Dannewitz, Kjetil Hindar, Marja-Liisa Kol- jonen, Linda Laikre, Eyðfinn Magnussen, and Snæbjörn Pálsson. TemaNord 2007:542 Genetic research on commercially exploited fish species in Nordic countries TemaNord 2007:542 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2007 ISBN 978-92-893-1508-1 This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/publications Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Council Store Strandstræde 18 Store Strandstræde 18 DK-1255 Copenhagen K DK-1255 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 Phone (+45) 3396 0400 Fax (+45) 3396 0202 Fax (+45) 3311 1870 www.norden.org Nordic cooperation Nordic cooperation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and three autonomous areas: the Faroe Islands, Green- land, and Åland. Nordic cooperation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic cooperation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive. Content Preface................................................................................................................................ 7 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 1. The role of genetics in fisheries management: current and future perspectives............ 11 1. 1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 11 1. 2 Objectives............................................................................................................ 13 2. Review of current knowledge and future perspectives ................................................. 15 2. 1 Identification of population structure .................................................................. 15 How can genetic information be used in management? .................................. 16 Empirical examples......................................................................................... 17 Summary of what we know............................................................................. 18 What information is needed in the future? ...................................................... 19 2. 2 Stocking .............................................................................................................. 20 How can genetic information be used in management? .................................. 22 Empirical examples......................................................................................... 22 Summary of what we know............................................................................. 23 What information is needed in the future? ...................................................... 24 2. 3 Cage-escapes from aquaculture........................................................................... 25 How can genetic information be used in management? .................................. 27 Empirical examples......................................................................................... 28 Summary of what we know............................................................................. 28 What information is needed in the future? ...................................................... 29 2. 4 Fisheries-induced evolution................................................................................. 30 How can genetic information be used in management? .................................. 31 Empirical examples......................................................................................... 31 Summary of what we know............................................................................. 32 What information is needed in the future? ...................................................... 33 2. 5 Effects of environmental change ......................................................................... 34 How can genetic information be used in management? .................................. 37 Empirical examples......................................................................................... 38 Summary of what we know............................................................................. 39 What information is needed in the future? ...................................................... 41 3. Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 43 3. 1 General recommendations................................................................................... 43 3. 2 Country-wise recommendations.......................................................................... 45 4. References .................................................................................................................... 47 Sammanfattning................................................................................................................ 55 Appendix 1 ....................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix 2. .................................................................................................................... 118 Appendix 3. .................................................................................................................... 121 Appendix 4 ..................................................................................................................... 123 Appendix 5 ..................................................................................................................... 125 Appendix 6 ..................................................................................................................... 126 Appendix 7 ..................................................................................................................... 128 Appendix 8 ..................................................................................................................... 132 Preface This document was produced during a three-day workshop with repre- sentatives from all Nordic countries held at the Institue of Coastal Re- search, Swedish Board of Fisheries, Öregrund, Sweden, the 25–27th Sep- tember 2006. The intention of the workshop was to summarize the cur- rent genetic research on commercially exploited fish species in the Nor- dic countries, and also to highlight how modern genetic techniques can be used to facilitate management of aquatic resources. The need for this was identified in an expert-seminar at Hólar College on Iceland in 2004 (“Ge- netic Diversity in Commercially Exploited Fish Species”) where selected expert scientists discussed the current knowledge regarding the effects of commercial fishing activities on the genetic diversity of wild, marine fish species in Nordic waters. The documentation from the meeting is comprised by a report, “The role of genetics in fisheries management: current and future perspec- tives”. In this report five different subjects where genetic information is crucial for effective management are discussed, • Identification of population structure, • Stocking, • Escapes from Aquaculture, • Fisheries-induced evolution, and • Effects of environmental change. The aim of this report is, however, not to discuss the use of genetics in aquaculture for human consumption. This document also includes lists of the existing competence in popu- lation genetic methods in the Nordic countries and where it is located (Appendix 1 and 2), the status of knowledge on genetic structures in a number of commercially important species occurring in Nordic waters (Appendix 3), national stocking statistics (Appendix 4), statistics of cage- escapes (Appendix 5), list of threatened and declining fish species in the Baltic Sea (Appendix 6), a list of existing genetic research networks in the Nordic countries (Appendix 7), and a more extensive reference list over the genetic research on fish and shellfish conducted in the Nordic countries (Appendix 8). The outline for a “Nordic network for genetic research on fish” was also discussed, but no further or more detailed conclusions were reached. The workshop was led by Dr. Teija Aho and Dr. Ann-Britt Florin, and was documented by Dr. Jens Olsson. Summary During the last decades the human impact on wild populations of fish has increased drastically worldwide as a result of extensive aquaculture, ex- ploitation for consumption and human-induced environmental change. Such activities likely affect the genetic diversity and structure of targeted species, and maintenance of genetic diversity has in turn been accepted as an internationally and common long-term goal in management of wild populations. Knowledge of neutral and adaptive genetic diversity is crucial since it provides information on the extent of local adaptations, the genetic popu- lation structure and the evolutionary potential of a species and/or popula- tion. The genetic architecture of a species also provides the basis for un- derstanding and predicting responses to changes at higher system levels, and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary Genomics of a Plastic Life History Trait: Galaxias Maculatus Amphidromous and Resident Populations
    EVOLUTIONARY GENOMICS OF A PLASTIC LIFE HISTORY TRAIT: GALAXIAS MACULATUS AMPHIDROMOUS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS by María Lisette Delgado Aquije Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2021 Dalhousie University is located in Mi'kma'ki, the ancestral and unceded territory of the Mi'kmaq. We are all Treaty people. © Copyright by María Lisette Delgado Aquije, 2021 I dedicate this work to my parents, María and José, my brothers JR and Eduardo for their unconditional love and support and for always encouraging me to pursue my dreams, and to my grandparents Victoria, Estela, Jesús, and Pepe whose example of perseverance and hard work allowed me to reach this point. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATION USED ................................................................................ xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ xv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Galaxias maculatus ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Lake Whitefish Prosopium Abyssicola
    Bear Lake Whitefish Prosopium abyssicola Actinopterygii — Salmoniformes — Salmonidae CONSERVATION STATUS / CLASSIFICATION Rangewide: Critically imperiled (G1) Statewide: Critically imperiled (S1) ESA: No status USFS: Region 1: No status; Region 4: No status BLM: Rangewide/Globally imperiled (Type 2) IDFG: Game fish BASIS FOR INCLUSION Endemic to Bear Lake. TAXONOMY The Bear Lake whitefish is 1 of 3 sympatric members of the genus Prosopium. No subspecies has been proposed. DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE This species is endemic to Bear Lake. POPULATION TREND Monitoring for >20 years indicates the population is stable (Nielson and Tolentino 2002). HABITAT AND ECOLOGY The Bear Lake whitefish typically occurs in the benthic zone at water depths greater than 40 m (130 ft). Spawning occurs in mid–February to mid–March in shallow, rocky areas. Ostracods comprise the majority of the diet, but other invertebrates found on the lake bottom may be consumed. ISSUES The lowering of lake levels due to natural events and anthropogenic actions could limit spawning and rearing habitat. Increasing human development around the lake could lead to lowering of water quality due to waste water discharges. Legal and illegal introductions of piscivorous fish could affect populations by increased predation rate. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Continue programs that (1) monitor the population status and trend; (2) evaluate the relationship between water quality and level and fish populations; (3) stock sterile triploid lake trout; and (4) removal of illegally introduced non–native fish (e.g., walleye) in conjuction with adjacent states. Bear Lake Whitefish Prosopium abyssicola Ecological Section Species Range 10 August 2005 Fish information is from Idaho Fish and Wildlife 0 20 40 80 Kilometers Information System, Idaho Deptartment of Fish and Game and displayed at the 6th code hydrologic unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Pollan, Coregonus Autumnalis: Options for Its Conservation
    Journal of Fish Biology (2001) 59 (Supplement A), 339–355 doi:10.1006/jfbi.2001.1755, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on The Irish pollan, Coregonus autumnalis: options for its conservation C. H*¶, D. G*, T. K. MC† R. R‡ *School of Environmental Studies, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, U.K., †Zoology Department, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland and ‡Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, U.K. The ecology of four relict Irish populations of pollan (Coregonus autumnalis) is compared with that of the species elsewhere, and used to advocate conservation. The threats to these populations from introduced/invasive species, habitat degradation, climate warming and commercial exploitation are summarized and the legislation governing conservation of the stocks is reviewed. Conservation options (legislation, habitat restoration, stock translocation and stock augmentation) are outlined and their practicality and efficacy considered. A preliminary search indicates that there are a number of lakes that appear to be suitable for pollan translocation. 2001 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles Key words: Coregonus autumnalis; conservation ecology; legislation; eutrophication; translocation. INTRODUCTION Owing to its recent glacial history, Ireland has a depauperate native freshwater fish fauna of only 14 species, all of euryhaline origin. Human introductions have augmented the Irish ichthyofauna and today 25 species are found in Ireland’s fresh waters (Griffiths, 1997). Of the native species, only one, the pollan Coregonus autumnalis Pallas is not found elsewhere in Europe (Whilde, 1993). Ireland has more than 4000 loughs (lakes) >5 ha, but pollan occur in only four large lowland loughs.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Lake Huron in 2010 Special Publication 13-01
    THE STATE OF LAKE HURON IN 2010 SPECIAL PUBLICATION 13-01 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures which will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes. The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes the Technical Report Series, intended for peer-reviewed scientific literature; Special Publications, designed primarily for dissemination of reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and other (non-serial) publications. Technical Reports are most suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission's program. Special Publications, being working documents, may evolve with the findings of and charges to a particular committee. Both publications follow the style of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Sponsorship of Technical Reports or Special Publications does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions contained therein are endorsed by the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 2020-04-20 Bear Lake Whitefish (Prosopium Abyssicola
    Version 2020-04-20 Bear Lake Whitefish (Prosopium abyssicola) Species Status Statement. Distribution Bear Lake whitefish is one of four fish species naturally found only in Bear Lake, which straddles the Utah-Idaho border. This species has also never been transplanted elsewhere, and occurs nowhere else in the world (Sigler and Sigler 1987). Table 1. Utah counties currently occupied by this species. Bear Lake Whitefish RICH Abundance and Trends Prior to 1999, there was simply no reliable method for fishery biologists to differentiate Bear Lake whitefish from Bonneville whitefish at lengths less than approximately 10 inches outside of their respective spawning seasons (Tolentino and Thompson 2004). Therefore, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) monitored both species combined as the “whitefish complex”. In 1999, Ward (2001) along with UDWR biologists (Tolentino and Thompson 2004) finally described a reliable method to distinguish the two whitefish species in Bear Lake. From 1999-2018 the UDWR has monitored gill net catch rates and composition of Bonneville and Bear Lake whitefish separately (Tolentino 2007). The population of Bear Lake whitefish has appeared to remain stable from 1999-2017, comprising an average of 26% of the whitefish species caught in survey nets each year. Statement of Habitat Needs and Threats to the Species. Habitat Needs Bear Lake whitefish spend a majority of their life near the bottom of the lake’s deep waters. For most of each year, they live at depths ranging from 130 to 200 feet (Thompson 2003, Tolentino 2007). However, during the months of February and March the adult fish move into rocky, somewhat shallower areas (20-100 feet) to spawn (Tolentino and Albrecht 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Age, Growth, and Size of Lake Superior Pygmy Whitefish (Prosopium Coulterii) Author(S): Taylor R
    Age, Growth, and Size of Lake Superior Pygmy Whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) Author(s): Taylor R. Stewart and Derek H. OgleOwen T. Gorman and Mark R. Vinson Source: The American Midland Naturalist, 175(1):24-36. Published By: University of Notre Dame DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1674/amid-175-01-24-36.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1674/amid-175-01-24-36.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Am. Midl. Nat. (2016) 175:24–36 Age, Growth, and Size of Lake Superior Pygmy Whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) 1 TAYLOR R. STEWART AND DEREK H. OGLE Department of Natural Resources, Northland College, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806 AND OWEN T. GORMAN AND MARK R. VINSON U. S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Superior Biological Station, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806 ABSTRACT.—Pygmy Whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) are a small, glacial relict species with a disjunct distribution in North America and Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Swimway Action Programme Document No.: WSB 28/5.2/2 Date: 01 March 19 Submitted By: Swimway Group, CWSS, TG-MM
    Wadden Sea Board WSB 28 14 March 2019 Berlin, Germany Agenda Item: 5.2 Nature conservation and integrated ecosystem management Subject: Swimway Action Programme Document No.: WSB 28/5.2/2 Date: 01 March 19 Submitted by: Swimway group, CWSS, TG-MM Attached is the final draft of the Swimway Action Programme, written by a trilateral coordination and writers’ team, with the aim to describe the actions needed to improve knowledge on relevant processes, optimize population monitoring, adjust policies and develop and realise and evaluate measures towards reaching the Trilateral Fish Targets. Changes to the version submitted to WSB 23 (WSB 23/5.2/2) consider responses received by TG-MM, as well as an updated chapter 6 on organisation, planning and funding. Proposal: The WSB is requested to adopt the Swimway Action Programme. Trilateral Wadden Sea Swimway Vision Action Programme Version: 1.0 (22 February 2019) Authors: SWIMWAY 2 Publisher Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (CWSS), Wilhelmshaven, Germany Authors Trilateral Swimway Group: • Martha Buitenkamp (Coordinator), Programma naar een Rijke Waddenzee (NL) • Christian Abel, Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer (DE) • Loes Bolle, Wageningen Marine Research (NL) • Kerry Brink, World Fish Migration Foundation (NL) • Andreas Dänhardt (DE) • Morten Søby Frederiksen, Environmental Protection Agency (DK) • Gerard Janssen, Rijkswaterstaat (NL) • Henrik G. Pind Jørgensen, Environmental Protection Agency (DK) • Adolf Kellermann, Kellermann-Consultants (DE) • Anne Sell, Thünen-Institut (DE) • Ingrid Tulp, Wageningen Marine Research (NL) • Paddy Walker, Programma naar een Rijke Waddenzee (NL) • Wouter van der Heij, Waddenvereniging (NL) • Ralf Vorberg, Marine Science Service (DE) • Sascha Klöpper & Julia A. Busch (Secretary), Common Wadden Sea Secretariat Editors Julia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Round Whitefish
    Species Status Assessment Class: Osteichthyes (bony fishes) Family: Salmonidae (trout and whitefish) Scientific Name: Prosopium cylindraceum Common Name: Round whitefish Species synopsis: The round whitefish occurs from Alaska in the northwest to Labrador and New England in the east. With the exception of Lake Erie, its distribution includes the Great Lakes. Round whitefish lives in lakes with a well oxygenated deep zone and is native to 7 of 18 watersheds in the Adirondack Mountains. It has also been known as non-native to the Oswegatchie watershed (previously stocked) with no records since 1955. Its distribution within its historic range has shrunk to 8 sites. A stocking program has established two more populations within its former range. It is extirpated from the Upper Hudson watershed. I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal _____Not Listed______________________ Candidate: ___No__ ii. New York _____Endangered, SGCN ____________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global _____G5________________________________________________________ ii. New York _____S1S2_________________ Tracked by NYNHP? _Yes__ Other Rank: Species of Northeast Regional Conservation Concern (Therres 1999) Status Discussion: Round whitefish is globally ranked as Secure, however in New York it is ranked as Imperiled/Critically Imperiled due to population declines (NatureServe 2012). 1 II. Abundance and Distribution Trends a. North America i. Abundance _____ declining _____increasing __X___ stable _____unknown ii. Distribution: _____ declining _____increasing ___X__ stable _____unknown Time frame considered: ____Based on global rank (NatureServe 2012)__ b. Regional i. Abundance _____ declining _____increasing _____stable _____unknown ii. Distribution: _____ declining _____increasing _____stable _____unknown Regional Unit Considered:___Region 5 - Northeast (Species of Concern)____ Time Frame Considered: _____________________ _________________________________ c.
    [Show full text]
  • Coregonus Nigripinnis) in Northern Algonquin Provincial Park
    HABITAT PREFERENCES AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF BLACKFIN CISCO (COREGONUS NIGRIPINNIS) IN NORTHERN ALGONQUIN PROVINCIAL PARK A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Arts and Science Trent University Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Allan Henry Miller Bell 2017 Environmental and Life Sciences M.Sc. Graduate Program September 2017 ABSTRACT Depth Distribution and Feeding Structure Differentiation of Blackfin Cisco (Coregonus nigripinnis) In Northern Algonquin Provincial Park Allan Henry Miller Bell Blackfin Cisco (Coregonus nigripinnis), a deepwater cisco species once endemic to the Laurentian Great Lakes, was discovered in Algonquin Provincial Park in four lakes situated within a drainage outflow of glacial Lake Algonquin. Blackfin habitat preference was examined by analyzing which covariates best described their depth distribution using hurdle models in a multi-model approach. Although depth best described their distribution, the nearly isothermal hypolimnion in which Blackfin reside indicated a preference for cold-water habitat. Feeding structure differentiation separated Blackfin from other coregonines, with Blackfin possessing the most numerous (50-66) gill rakers, and, via allometric regression, the longest gill rakers and lower gill arches. Selection for feeding efficiency may be a result of Mysis diluviana affecting planktonic size structure in lakes containing Blackfin Cisco, an effect also discovered in Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). This thesis provides insight into the habitat preferences and feeding ecology of Blackfin and provides a basis for future study. Keywords: Blackfin Cisco, Lake Whitefish, coregonine, Mysis, habitat, feeding ecology, hurdle models, allometric regression, Algonquin Provincial Park ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 13-0000-1900) - Department of Fish and Game
    Dear Senators HEIDER, Brackett, Stennett, and Representatives GIBBS, Gestrin, Erpelding: The Legislative Services Office, Research and Legislation, has received the enclosed rules of the Department of Fish and Game: IDAPA 13.00.00 - Notice of Omnibus Rulemaking - Temporary and Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No. 13-0000-1900) - Department of Fish and Game. Pursuant to Section 67-454, Idaho Code, a meeting on the enclosed rules may be called by the cochairmen or by two (2) or more members of the subcommittee giving oral or written notice to Research and Legislation no later than fourteen (14) days after receipt of the rules' analysis from Legislative Services. The final date to call a meeting on the enclosed rules is no later than 07/30/2019. If a meeting is called, the subcommittee must hold the meeting within forty-two (42) days of receipt of the rules' analysis from Legislative Services. The final date to hold a meeting on the enclosed rules is 08/27/2019. The germane joint subcommittee may request a statement of economic impact with respect to a proposed rule by notifying Research and Legislation. There is no time limit on requesting this statement, and it may be requested whether or not a meeting on the proposed rule is called or after a meeting has been held. To notify Research and Legislation, call 334-4854, or send a written request to the address on the memorandum attached below. Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Rules Review Subcommittee of the Senate Resources & Environment Committee and the House Resources & Conservation Committee FROM: Deputy Division Manager - Katharine Gerrity DATE: July 11, 2019 SUBJECT: Department of Fish and Game IDAPA 13.00.00 - Notice of Omnibus Rulemaking - Temporary and Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CWU Comparative Osteology Collection, List of Specimens
    CWU Comparative Osteology Collection, List of Specimens List updated November 2019 0-CWU-Collection-List.docx Specimens collected primarily from North American mid-continent and coastal Alaska for zooarchaeological research and teaching purposes. Curated at the Zooarchaeology Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, Central Washington University, under the direction of Dr. Pat Lubinski, [email protected]. Facility is located in Dean Hall Room 222 at CWU’s campus in Ellensburg, Washington. Numbers on right margin provide a count of complete or near-complete specimens in the collection. Specimens on loan from other institutions are not listed. There may also be a listing of mount (commercially mounted articulated skeletons), part (partial skeletons), skull (skulls), or * (in freezer but not yet processed). Vertebrate specimens in taxonomic order, then invertebrates. Taxonomy follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System online (www.itis.gov) as of June 2016 unless otherwise noted. VERTEBRATES: Phylum Chordata, Class Petromyzontida (lampreys) Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae: Pacific lamprey ............................................................. Entosphenus tridentatus.................................... 1 Phylum Chordata, Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) unidentified shark teeth ........................................................ ........................................................................... 3 Order Squaliformes Family Squalidae Spiny dogfish ........................................................
    [Show full text]