DOCSLIB.ORG

Breaking Barriers Project: Kenya, Uganda and Zambia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Breaking Barriers Project: Kenya, Uganda and Zambia BREAKING BARRIERS PROJECT: KENYA, UGANDA AND ZAMBIA END-TERM EVALUATION REPORT MAY 2010 UPWARD BOUND COMPANY LIMITED Marist Road, Karen, P.O. Box 79747, Nairobi Tel 254 20 3594276 email:[email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................................... ii LIST OF BOXES................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ......................................................................................................... v ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. vi DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ x 1.0 BACKGROUND......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BREAKING BARRIERS PROJECT........................................................................... 1 1.2 PEPFAR................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION.................................................................................... 9 3.1 ALIGNMENT TO GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS ................................................. 9 3.2 ALIGNMENT TO NATIONAL GOVERNMENT POLICIES ........................................... 9 3.3 ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL CAUSES OF POVERTY........................................... 12 3.4 ADDRESSING GENDER INEQUALITY................................................................... 13 3.5 ENTRY AND IDENTIFICATION PROCESS............................................................. 14 3.6 EFFICIENCY ........................................................................................................ 15 3.7 PARTNERSHIPS .................................................................................................. 20 3.8 EFFECTIVENESS AND OUTCOMES ..................................................................... 23 ii Breaking Barriers Project End-Term Evaluation Report, May 2010 ub 3.9 LEARNING, INNOVATION, UP SCALING AND REPLICATION................................. 29 3.10 ACCOUNTABILITY ............................................................................................... 31 3.11 SUSTAINABILITY ................................................................................................. 31 3.12 PROGRAM QUALITY............................................................................................ 32 3.13 FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO BB SUCCESS....................................................... 40 3.14 CHALLENGES...................................................................................................... 42 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 44 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 45 6.0 APPENDICES ......................................................................................................... 47 6.1 APPENDIX I: TERMS OF REFERENCE.................................................................. 47 6.2 APPENDIX II: TOOLS............................................................................................ 49 6.3 APPENDIX III – BB PROJECT END TERM EVALUATION - ITINERARY AND CALENDAR OF EVENTS ................................................................................................. 56 iii Breaking Barriers Project End-Term Evaluation Report, May 2010 ub LIST OF BOXES Box 1: Law and Policies: The Uganda Experience..........................................................................11 Box 2: Stigma and Discrimination associated with HIV and AIDS...................................................13 Box 3: Changing lives .....................................................................................................................28 Box 4: Economic Challenges and Coping Strategies......................................................................34 Box 5: Levels of Psychosocial Support ...........................................................................................35 Box 6: Psychosocial support principles...........................................................................................36 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Epidemic curves for HIV, AIDS and Orphans.................................................................... 1 Figure 2: Age distribution of OVC interviewed.................................................................................. 6 Figure 3: Breaking Barriers Project Organizational Structure..........................................................16 Figure 4: Breaking Barriers Project and the Circle of Hope.............................................................21 Figure 5: Percentage of OVC attending school...............................................................................24 Figure 6: Percentage of OVC living in institutions ...........................................................................25 Figure 7: Advocacy efforts by OVC for better services....................................................................27 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Distribution of respondents................................................................................................. 5 Table 2: Breakdown served OVC by age......................................................................................... 5 Table 3: Utilization of data collection tools ....................................................................................... 6 Table 4: Breaking Barriers expenditure...........................................................................................17 Table 5: Breaking Barriers financial cost per OVC served ..............................................................19 Table 6: Breaking Barriers expenditure variances...........................................................................20 Table 7: OVC served per category of service..................................................................................23 Table 8: Progress tracking table for OVC served............................................................................28 Table 9: Framework for analyzing the socioeconomic impact of HIV and AIDS on orphans...........33 Table 10: Evaluating BB against PEPFAR best practice.................................................................37 iv Breaking Barriers Project End-Term Evaluation Report, May 2010 ub ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This end-tem evaluation was commissioned by Plan International Kenya to Upward Bound Company Ltd, a firm of professional consultants and researchers based in Nairobi. Many individuals, children and institutions greatly benefited the evaluation by setting aside time to share their perspectives. Were it not for their participation and sacrifice, this report would not have been possible. Upward Bound Company Ltd. therefore wishes to acknowledge their support and input. We thank Breaking Barriers Regional Manager, Bwibo Adieri, Plan USA Technical Advisor in- charge of the Breaking Barriers project, Laban Tsuma, and the Breaking Barriers team in Kenya, Uganda and Zambia for the administrative and technical support they offered during the course of the evaluation. We also thank the Strategic Program Support Manager, Samual Musyoki, Corporate Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Manager, Benson King’oo, and Corporate Evaluation and Monitoring Coordinator, Stephen Okoth, all of Plan International Kenya. We are especially indebted to them for sharing an overview of the project and for offering invaluable insights. We are also indebted to the current and former staff of Plan in Kenya, Uganda and Zambia; Save the Children in Uganda; Inter-Religious Council of Kenya; Inter-Religious Council of Uganda; St. Johns’ Community Centre; Kisumu Urban Apostolic Program (KUAP), Rang’ala; USAID in Kenya, Uganda and Zambia; ZINGO; and a host of Breaking Barriers partners. We also acknowledge the cooperation and views: Government officials serving in the areas we visited who went out of their way to avail useful data and perspectives; Community Based Organizations’ leaders and their members who discussed with us their experiences of working with the BB project; Community leaders, men and women, the youth, people living with disabilities as well as members of other disadvantaged groups who provided information that enriched this evaluation report; The children who volunteered to share with the evaluators on the work done by the Breaking Barriers project and its impact on their lives; Many others who, though not mentioned here by name, contributed to the success of this evaluation. Last, and by no means least, we thank Daniel Masyuki, Florence Juma, Jeremiah Mbewe, Lydia Amoit, Zipporah Mashini and Munaweza
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mozambique Zambia South Africa Zimbabwe Tanzania
    UNITED NATIONS MOZAMBIQUE Geospatial 30°E 35°E 40°E L a k UNITED REPUBLIC OF 10°S e 10°S Chinsali M a l a w TANZANIA Palma i Mocimboa da Praia R ovuma Mueda ^! Lua Mecula pu la ZAMBIA L a Quissanga k e NIASSA N Metangula y CABO DELGADO a Chiconono DEM. REP. OF s a Ancuabe Pemba THE CONGO Lichinga Montepuez Marrupa Chipata MALAWI Maúa Lilongwe Namuno Namapa a ^! gw n Mandimba Memba a io u Vila úr L L Mecubúri Nacala Kabwe Gamito Cuamba Vila Ribáué MecontaMonapo Mossuril Fingoè FurancungoCoutinho ^! Nampula 15°S Vila ^! 15°S Lago de NAMPULA TETE Junqueiro ^! Lusaka ZumboCahora Bassa Murrupula Mogincual K Nametil o afu ezi Namarrói Erego e b Mágoè Tete GiléL am i Z Moatize Milange g Angoche Lugela o Z n l a h m a bez e i ZAMBEZIA Vila n azoe Changara da Moma n M a Lake Chemba Morrumbala Maganja Bindura Guro h Kariba Pebane C Namacurra e Chinhoyi Harare Vila Quelimane u ^! Fontes iq Marondera Mopeia Marromeu b am Inhaminga Velha oz P M úngu Chinde Be ni n è SOFALA t of ManicaChimoio o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o gh ZIMBABWE o Bi Mutare Sussundenga Dondo Gweru Masvingo Beira I NDI A N Bulawayo Chibabava 20°S 20°S Espungabera Nova OCE A N Mambone Gwanda MANICA e Sav Inhassôro Vilanculos Chicualacuala Mabote Mapai INHAMBANE Lim Massinga p o p GAZA o Morrumbene Homoíne Massingir Panda ^! National capital SOUTH Inhambane Administrative capital Polokwane Guijá Inharrime Town, village o Chibuto Major airport Magude MaciaManjacazeQuissico International boundary AFRICA Administrative boundary MAPUTO Xai-Xai 25°S Nelspruit Main road 25°S Moamba Manhiça Railway Pretoria MatolaMaputo ^! ^! 0 100 200km Mbabane^!Namaacha Boane 0 50 100mi !\ Bela Johannesburg Lobamba Vista ESWATINI Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • (SSA) Countries IDA19 Fourth Replenishment Meeting, December 12-13, 2019, Stockholm, Sweden
    African Countries are Awakening Hope for a Better Tomorrow with IDA Statement by Representatives of 49 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) Countries IDA19 Fourth Replenishment Meeting, December 12-13, 2019, Stockholm, Sweden 1. IDA countries have only 10 years to achieve the globally agreed targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Given that it takes 9 years for pledges under any IDA cycle to be fully paid up, IDA19 is therefore, the last replenishment to help finance the SDGs in the time left to 2030. 2. Africa as a continent is making progress towards the SDGs. Growth in many economies has outpaced global benchmarks. More children are in school and health service coverage is expanding. A continent-wide free-trade agreement shows regional cooperation is alive and deepening, including in building roads and power lines that bring countries together and make markets bigger. The support of donors to the 18th replenishment of the International Development Association (IDA18) has been pivotal and has underpinned the partnership between African countries and the World Bank Group (WBG) that has never been stronger. Indeed, Africa’s absorptive capacity to carefully use concessional funds has ensured that the pace of commitment for IDA18 has been record-breaking. 3. We want to acknowledge the strong partnership between IDA and most of our countries. We commend all donors for the important role that IDA has been playing in the transformation agenda of most SSA countries. We are happy with the negotiated IDA19 package and the continuation of all the special themes of IDA18, the Private Sector Window, and the improvements to the various facilities especially under Fragility, Conflict and Violence (FCV).
    [Show full text]
  • African Dialects
    African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Assessment for All May 2020
    OPTIMIZING ASSESSMENT FOR ALL MAY 2020 OPTIMIZING ASSESSMENT FOR ALL Classroom-based assessments of 21st century skills in the Democratic Republic of Congo, The Gambia, and Zambia OPTIMIZING ASSESSMENT FOR ALL Authors Helyn Kim was a fellow in the Global Economy and Development Program at the Brookings Institution Esther Care is a senior fellow in the Global Economy and Development Program at the Brookings Institution Optimizing Assessment for All (OAA) is a project of the Brookings Institution. The aim of OAA is to support countries to improve the assessment, teaching, and learning of 21st century skills through increasing assessment literacy among regional and national education stakeholders, focusing on the constructive use of assessment in education, and developing new methods for assessing 21st century skills. Acknowledgements The authors and the OAA Africa National Teams appreciate the support of UNESCO’s Teaching and Learning Educators’ Network for Transformation (TALENT) and our thanks are extended in particular to Davide Ruscelli. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Democratic Republic of Congo National Team; The Gambia National Team; and the Zambia National Team for their substantial contributions to their respective country sections of the report. Additionally, the authors thank Joesal Jan A. Marabe of the Assessment Curriculum and Technology Research Centre, University of the Philippines Diliman, for technical contributions, and Aynur Gul Sahin for her creative and editorial support. The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Zambia
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME The Convention between the Government of the Republic of Kenya and the Government of the Republic of Zambia for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income. The Government of the Republic of Kenya and the Government of the Republic of Zambia. Desiring to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation and prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income. Have agreed as follows:- Article I [Taxes covered] 1. The taxes which are the subject of the present Convention are: (a) in Zambia (and hereinafter referred to as "Zambian tax"): (i) the income tax; (ii) supertax; (iii) the undistributed profits tax; and (iv) the personal levy; (b) in Kenya (and hereinafter referred to as "Kenyan tax"): (i) the income tax; (ii) corporation tax; (iii) the undistributed income tax; and (iv) the graduated personal tax. 2. The present Convention shall also apply to any other taxes of a substantially similar character imposed in Zambia or Kenya subsequently to the date of signature of the present Convention. At the end of each year the taxation authorities of the Contracting States shall notify to each other any changes which have been made in their respective taxation laws. Article II [General definitions] 1. In the present Convention, unless the context
    [Show full text]
  • ZAMBIA-ZIMBABWE-BOTSWANA-NAMIBIA INTERCONNECTOR (Zizabona) – PHASE ‘A’
    Language: English Original: English PROJECT: ZAMBIA-ZIMBABWE-BOTSWANA-NAMIBIA INTERCONNECTOR (ZiZaBoNa) – PHASE ‘A’ COUNTRY: ZAMIBA & ZIMBABWE ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (ARAP) SUMMARY Date: November 2018 1 ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (ARAP) SUMMARY Project Title: Zambia-Zimbabwe-Botswana-Namibia Interconnector (ZiZaBoNa) – Phase A Country: Zambia/Zimbabwe Project Number: P-Z1-FA0-135 Project Category: Category 1 Departments: PESD/RDGS 1. INTRODUCTION The ZIZABONA transmission project consists of the development, financing, construction and operation of new transmission facilities in Zambia and Zimbabwe, Botswana and Namibia with the view to facilitate the establishment of a western transmission corridor in Southern Africa. The project derives its name from the first two letters of each of the four countries involved. The electricity utilities of Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana and Namibia signed an Inter-Utility Memorandum for the development of the transmission network called ZIZABONA in 2007, and an Inter-Governmental Memorandum of Understanding was signed by the governments of the four countries in 2012 to ensure improved transmission of electric power between the participant nations. ZIZABONA is to be developed as three components, namely: • Component A: Hwange (Zimbabwe) to Mukuni (Zambia) 400 kV transmission line network (115 km) • Component B: Victoria Falls (Zimbabwe) to Pandamatenga (Botswana) 400 kV transmission line network (59 km) • Component C: Mukuni (Zambia) to Zambezi (Namibia) 400 kV transmission line network
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania-Zambia Railway: Escape Route from Neocolonial Control? Alvin W
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology 1970 Tanzania-Zambia Railway: Escape Route from Neocolonial Control? Alvin W. Wolfe [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/ant_facpub Part of the Anthropology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Wolfe, Alvin W., "Tanzania-Zambia Railway: Escape Route from Neocolonial Control?" (1970). Anthropology Faculty Publications. 10. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/ant_facpub/10 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. f.~m NONALIGNED THIRD WORLD ANNUAL 1970 ';;~~: Books International ot DH-T~ %n~ernational St. Louis, Missouri, USA . \ ESCAPE ROUTE ALVINW. WOLFE* THE FIRST REQUISITE for African development is that African countries combine what little wealth and power they have toward the end of getting a greater share of the products of world industry. They may be able to get that greater share by forcing through better terms of trade or better terms in aid, but they will never get any greater share by continuing along present paths, whereby each weak and poor country "negotiates" separately with strong and rich developed countries and supranational emities such as the World Bank and major private companies. If they hope to break thos.e ne,ocolonial bonds, Africans must unite-
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry-Based Science Education: a Scenario on Zambia's High School
    Science Education International Vol.23, No.4, December 2012, 307-327 Inquiry-based science education: A scenario on Zambia’s high school science curriculum Vivien M. Chabalengula*, Frackson Mumba Southern Illinois University, USA Abstract This paper is aimed at elucidating the current state of inquiry-based science education (IBSE) in Zambia’s high school science curriculum. Therefore, we investigated Zambian teachers’ conceptions of inquiry; determined inquiry levels in the national high school science curriculum materials, which include syllabi, textbooks and practical exams; and determined the extent to which inquiry tasks and skills are emphasized in the science curriculum materials. Based on the results, we have proposed ways in which IBSE in Zambia can be improved, particularly in teacher preparation curriculum, assessment and pedagogy. The major results emerging from this study were that teachers’ have a narrow conception of inquiry; there is a discrepancy in the coverage of inquiry levels in syllabi, textbooks and practical exams; and there is much emphasis on lower inquiry tasks and skills in textbooks and exams. These findings laid a basis for our proposed plan for improved inquiry-based science education in Zambia, as discussed herein. It is anticipated the proposed plan on IBSE will prove useful to Zambian science teachers, teacher educators, professional development providers and curriculum developers in resituating Zambian’s science curriculum to be in line with current IBSE models. Key words: inquiry, science curriculum, syllabi, textbooks, practical exams Introduction The concept of inquiry-based science education (IBSE) was well articulated by Joseph Schwab during the 1960s, when he protested the teaching of science as a presentation of scientific facts (Schwab, 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports
    COUNTRY REPORTS DISPLACED & DISCONNECTED UNHCR CONNECTIVITY FOR REFUGEES Innovation Service COUNTRY REPORTS DISPLACED AND DISCONNECTED Made possible thanks to the generous support of: In partnership with: The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators worldwide, uniting more than 750 operators with over 350 companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset and device makers, software companies, equipment providers and internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors. The GSMA also produces the industry-leading MWC events held annually in Barcelona, Los Angeles and Shanghai, as well as the Mobile 360 Series of regional conferences. For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 1 These country reports provide information on the legal situation for displaced populations, namely AFGHANISTAN 2 asylum seekers, refugees, and returnees, where relevant, regarding access to mobile services, in BANGLADESH 6 each country covered. Each report contains information on: BRAZIL 10 BURUNDI 14 • Registration and Identification of Displaced Persons CAMEROON 18 • SIM Registration CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC 22 • Know Your Customer Rules • Mobile Money CHAD 26 • Data Protection DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO 30 ETHIOPIA 34 Information sources cover freely published information from the relevant regulators or ministries, JORDAN 38 academic papers and other internet sources. Specific information on the practical situation in KENYA 42 country has been provided by UNHCR local staff. LEBANON 46 MAURITANIA 50 The content of this report, including information and links, is provided free of charge and is NIGER 54 intended to be helpful to the widest range of people and organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy and Globalization in Zambia
    Economy and Globalization in Zambia At the time of independence, Zambia was expected to become of the wealthiest nations in Africa. With access to raw materials such as copper and land, Zambia seemed to have all it needed to succeed in the global economy. However, it is now one of the world’s poorest nations. So how did this dramatic change take place in less than 30 years? Much of Africa has experienced economic decline in the past decades. How does Zambia’s situation compare to other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and how is it affected by the geographic context in which it exists? Examining the economic situation and Zambia’s place in the global economy will help these questions to be understood. Lusaka, Zambia Zambia is a land-locked country located in central Africa. About the size of Texas, it is home to 11 million people. The population is made up of a variety of ethnic groups, most of whom speak Bantu. Zambia is currently one of the poorest countries in Africa, and is identified by the United Nations Development Program as a HIPC – Highly Indebted Poor Country. “Lusaka is the product of a country battling to find its way in a new world, caught between colonial beginnings, years of socialist independence and now democracy.” -Zambian National Tourist Board Lusaka became the capital of Zambia in 1930 but growth really took place in the 1960’s. The Lusaka City Council describes the city as a metropolis home to 2.5 million people. Lusaka is constantly changing. New shops are being built, and a multi-million dollar shopping mall is being constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Country Analysis Summary Refer to This Publication As: Zambia Country Analysis (2015)
    Zambia Country Analysis Summary Refer to this publication as: Zambia Country Analysis (2015). This is a summary of a country analysis prepared by an independent consultant for the United Nations Country Team in Zambia. Copyright: United Nations Country Team, Zambia Contact for further detail: UN Resident Coordinator’s Office, Zambia Zambia Country Analysis Summary CONTENTS Acronyms 05 Boxes Leaving no one behind 15 Progress towards middle-income Zambia comes with addressing inequality, strengthening social protection and reducing vulnerabilities 17 Where some are more equal than others… 22 Chapter I Introduction 09 Chapter II Background 13 Overview 13 Economic Performance 13 Human Development Challenge 13 Poverty Reduction Policies and Strategies 14 Inequality and Vulnerability 14 Causes of Vulnerabilities 15 Employment 16 Nutrition and Food Security 18 Mortality and Morbidity 19 Education 19 Water and Sanitation 20 Environmental Sustainability 20 Peace and Security 23 Migration and Refugees 23 Governance 25 Chapter III Key Priorities for Ensuring Equity in Zambia 31 Chapter IV Comparative Advantages of the United Nations in Zambia 35 Chapter V Way Forward 39 ACRONYMS CA Country analysis Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/ UNAIDS AIDS Common Market for Eastern and COMESA Southern Africa United Nations Capital Development UNCDF Fund FAO Food and Agriculture Organization UNCT United Nations Country Team FNDP Fifth National Development Plan United Nations Conference on Trade and UNCTAD GDP Gross domestic product Development GRZ Government
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile: Zambia
    COUNTRY PROFILE: ZAMBIA A descriptive overview of Zambia’s country and health system context including the opportunities for innovation. Prepared by: BERTHA CENTRE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION & ENTREPRENEURSHIP UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN Athenkosi Sopitshi – [email protected] Lindi Van Niekerk – [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary Zambia has made some gains in growing its economy and improving its health outcomes. However, an elevated diseases burden, under resourced health system and poor infrastructure in its rural areas has stunted its progress in reducing the spread of HIV, malaria, and child and maternal mortality. According to the World Health Organization, children in Zambia still die from preventable diseases such as diarrhea, malaria, pneumonia, HIV/AIDS and malnutrition. Poverty still remains the major factor in combating the country’s health challenges. Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 1. Country at a Glance ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Country Context .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Country history and political system ..................................................................................... 3 2.2. Population ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]