Notes and References
Notes and References CHAPTER 1: INTRODUO'ION: RE-INTERPRETING SHAKESPEARE 1. Stanley Wells, Literature and Drama, with special Reference to Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (London, 1970) pp. 10~9. For a recent critique of play-text looked at 'as novel', 'as play' or 'as poem' see Terence Hawkes, That Shakespeherian Rag: essays on a critical process (London, 1986) pp. 7>-91. Another interesting discussion is that of Erving Coffman, 'The Theatrical Frame', Frame Analysis (Harmondsworth, 1975) pp. 124--55. 2. Adolphe Appia, Music and the Art of Theatre, trans. Robert W. Corrigan and Mary Douglas Dirks, ed. B. Hewitt (Coral Gables, Florida 1962) p. 10. 3. See David L. Hirst, Edward Bond (London and Basingstoke, 1985) p. 132. 4. William Shakespeare, The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet Prince of Denmarke 1603, in Elizabethan and jacobean Quartos edited by G. B. Harrison (Edinburgh, 1966) p. 28. (Reproduced from the Bodley Head Quartos published between 1922 and 1926, London). See The New Penguin Hamlet edited by T. J. B. Spencer, introduction Anne Barton (Har mondsworth, 1980). 5. Op. cit., pp. 37-8. Notice also the differences in this speech as printed in two modern editions: the Penguin here and Professor Alexander's text for Collins as quoted in Chapter 2. 6. A survey of Shakespearean production is found in George C. D. Odell, Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving, 2 vols, 1920 (Dover edition, New York, 1966). 7. From George Granville, Lord Lansdowne, The ]eu.> of Venice extracted in Shakespeare. The Critical Heritage, vol. 2, 169>-1733, ed. Brian Vickers (London, 1974) p. 152.
[Show full text]