DOCSLIB.ORG

New Evidence Proves Echo Park Legally Reserved For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Evidence Proves Echo Park Legally Reserved For Published by the Upper Colorado River Grass Roots, lnc.-A citizens' group supporting the Colorado NEW EVIDENCE PROVES ECHO PARK LEGALLY RESERVED FOR DAM SITE Sena tor Watkins produced documents showing that eleven power and reclama­ ECHO PAR K NOT A PARK; tion withdrawals specifically including the Echo Park and Split Mountain dam sites, MERELY DEEP CANYON were made from 1904 to 1925. These filings are in full force and effect today. Many Americans not familiar with Echo Park and Split Mountain dam sites 8,FQ~ TFQ!il@ily ,a&~\I.RIQ that • Eeh are now-an a w·ays nave een-legally Park is just that-a park. But it isn't. reserved for power and reclamation pur­ It's merely a deep-walled bare canyon. poses, new documentary evidence pre­ The area got its name from an old sented to Congress shows. custom in the West of designating small The new evidence was presented by basin areas on streams, in canyons and Sen. Arthur V. Watkins during recent in the national forests as "parks." hearings on the Colorado River S'torage Project of which Echo Park is the key unit. Grazing Still Allowed "Construction of Echo Park thus could not possibly serve as a precedent for In Echo Park; More invading national monuments," Sen. Wat­ kins said. "In fact, these documents actu­ Proof Damsite Exempted ally prove the reverse-that this reserved Release of new documentary evidence reclamation area has been invaded illeg­ supporting legal withdrawal of the Echo ally by a national monument. Park area for reclamation purposes is cor­ "I declare without fear of successful roborated by continued grazing of the challenge that the opponents of Echo Park area. and Split Mountain reservoirs are attempt­ This point is emphasized by David H. ing to invade areas which were withdrawn Madsen, the acting superintendent of This is a rtist's d ra wi ng of from the public domain and set aside for Dinosaur National Monument at the time p roposed Echo Park Dam. the specific purpose of water and power it was enlarged. Structure wi ll cover only development and conservation, by duly "I was authorized to state and did o ne-sixth of canyo n walls. constituted agencies of the United States state as a representative of the National many years before the extension of the Park Service, that grazing on the area ECHO PARK KEY UNIT Dinosaur National Monument was ever would not be discontinued and that in the thought of. event it became necessary to construct a OF Vil Al COLORADO "And these withdrawn areas enjoy the project or projects for power or irrigation same status now as they did the day they in order to develop that part of the RIVER STORAGE PROJECT were withdrawn," the Senator declared. states of Colorado and Utah, that the Echo Park Dam is unreservedly recom­ Senator Watkins, who won widespread establishment of the Monument would not mended by all residents of the Mountain commendation for his successful conduct interfere with sue. development " Mr. West beca'.!Se_ it is th key un· cLt of the Senatct:.. McCru:thy censure case, pro­ adsen says. Colorado River Storage Project. duced his new evidence after an extensive Mr. Madsen promised the people of Utah It is the "work horse" of the project. search of government records. and Colorado that grazing and r eclam ation It can produce more power and produce Following study of the records, he said rights would be preserved. In the 17 it more efficiently t h an any other site, he could categorically state that the Echo intervening years, grazing has continued according to reclamation officials. Park and Split Mountain dam sites "are in the Dinosaur area-and power and "The Echo Dam is the key unit in the not now an d never have been under the irrigation rights are just as valid. Upper Colorado development because it exclusive possession and jurisdiction of the makes feasible the other dams in t he gen­ National Park Administration. 11 POWER WITHDRAWALS eral area. No other dam in the Upper "In ·fact," the Senator told his col­ system can stand alone as a power pro­ leagues, "it is extremely doubtful that the IN EFFECT NOW, FPC SAYS ducer," says Iva! Goslin of t he Upper National Park Service has now, or ever Eleven power site withdrawals in the Colorado River Commission. has had, jurisdiction over said areas, Echo Park area are as effective today as "No other substitute site is available except in subservient capacity, the day they were filed. which can provide stream regulation on "These conclusions furthermore are sus­ So ruled Jerome K. Kuykendall, chair­ the upper reaches of the river system; tained by irrefutable documentary evi­ man of the Federal Power Commission, in which can provide water for consumptive dence from the records of the Federal a recent opinion- for Sen. Arthur V. Wat­ use in the Uintah Basin; which can provide Power Commission-an independent fed­ kins. a tie between Glen Canyon and the Upper eral agency set up by Congress-and the "You asked to be advised as to: What Basin power outlets," Mr. Goslin said. Department of the Interior," the Senator was the status of the power withdrawals Echo Park is what reclamation engineers said. on July 14, 1938, and what is their status fondly term a high-altitude deep-walled IN SUPPORT OF HIS STAND at this time?" Mr. Kuykendall wrote. dam site, thus providing the least possible The Sen ator produced a recent letter "In answer to that inquiry, the follow­ evaporation losses. The best possible from Jerome K. Kuykendall, chairman ing power site withdrawals were in effect alternate would involve •the added loss of the Federal Power Commission, which July 14, 1938, as to lands now within the through evaporation of 100,000 acre feet stated that the "power site with drawals monument boundaries and no appreciable of water a year. This is enough water to were in effect July 14, 1938, as to lands change has been m ade in them since that supply a city the size of Denver..:..and in now within the monument boundaries date" (eleven power site withdrawals the water-short West, that loss is pro­ and no appreciable change has been made listed). hibitive. in them since that date." See Documents on Page 4 Lands Withdrawn for Power Purposes Within Dinosaur National Monument Legend Power Site Withdrawals Date of Approval Still in Effect PSR Reserve No. 5 May 26, 1909 Yes Power Site Reserve Reserve No. 42 Aug.27, 1909 Yes Reserve No. 121 March 10, 1910 Yes PSC Reserve No. 721 July 11, 1919 Yes Power Site Classification Reserve No. 732 Dec. 27, 1919 Yes Classification No. 3 May 17, 1921 Yes Red Area Classification No. 60 Feb.21,1924 Yes Dinosaur National Monument Classification No. 87 Feb.14, 1925 Yes Classification No. 93 April 16, 1925 Yes Black Area (Echo Dam) Lands withdrawn for power purposes FPC Project No. 524 Aug.4, 1924 Yes I Echo Park Dam Site I Originc,I Monument Area (80 ACRES) I n DOCUMENTS SHOW ECHO PARK AREA RESERVED FOR POWER USE Shown in black on the accompanying quested release of these power and map are the 11 power and reclamation reclamation reservations but that both site withdrawals made from 1904 to requests were rejected by the Federal 1925 in what is now Dinosaur National Power Commission. Monument. These land reservations Following is the direct quotation of -specifically including the Echo Park the FPC on this matter at that time: dam site--were made ·by the Secretary " ... Giving due consideration to the of the Interior or by the Federal Power prospect that some time may elapse Commission for the purpose of water before this power is needed, the Com­ and power development in the public mission believes that the public inter­ interest. These reservations are still est in this major power resource is too in full force and effect today, according reat to permit its impairment by to the chairman of the ederal ower vo untary re mqms ment of two units Commission and government authori­ [Echo Park and Blue Mountain dam ties who have checked the documents sites] in the center of the scheme. The in the case. Commission will not object, however, Thus, there is no question of the to the creation of the monument if the dam site invading the national monu­ proclamation contains a specific pro­ ment-in fact it is the other way vision that power development under around actually. The reclamation site the provisions of the Federal Water has first and prior rights legally. Power act will be permitted." This Documents accepted recently by the specific provision was included in the House and Senate Committee hearings presidential proclamation of 1938 on the Colorado River Storage Project which expanded Dinosaur National show that the National Parks Service Monument from 80 to 203,965 acres and the Secretary of the Interior twice and took in the above-mentioned dam -once in 1934 and once in 1935-re- sites. DOCUMENTS Continued from Page 1 Also introduced into the Senate record were letters from the Federal Power Com­ HISTORY OF Pleas to Release Echo Site mission of Dec. 13, 1934 and again of Jan. 6, 1936, in which Frank R. McNinch, ECHO PARK DAM SITE Twice Reiected by chairman of the Federal Power Commis­ sion, rejected requests of the National 1904 to 1925: Eleven withdrawals or Federal Power Chief Park s •~rvice and the Interior Department reservations of large tracts within the that the power sites be relinquished.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP, Arizona and Utah
    Contents Glen Canyon Unit ............................................................................................................................2 Project Location...................................................................................................................3 Historic Setting ....................................................................................................................4 Project Authorization .........................................................................................................8 Pre-Construction ................................................................................................................14 Construction.......................................................................................................................21 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water.......................................................................31 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................36 Notes ..................................................................................................................................39 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................46 Index ..................................................................................................................................52 Glen Canyon Unit The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central
    [Show full text]
  • ECHO PARK DAM TRUTHS Echo Park Dam Is Not
    ECHO PARK DAM TRUTHS Echo Park Dam Is Not Invasion. The building of Echo Park Dam in Dinosaur National Monument oes not create a precedent, nor is it an invasion of our National Park system. In the discussions of building th e proposed Echo Park Dam many part-truths, half-truths, and deliberate stretching of the truth have been heard. To clarify the record the following circumstances are enumer­ ated which definitely establish rights for Power and Irrigation projects wjthin th� Dinosaur National Monument. 1904 Brown's Park reservoir site surveyed. Lands withdrawn for Brown's Park or the Green River project October 17, 1904. 1906 Act of Congress providing authority of the President to establish National Monuments. 19Cf7 Brown's Park dam site drilled by Burea of Reclamation. and Total cost to the Bureau of R8clrunation $43,000. 1908 1910 First surveys of Split Mountain dam site by Nile Hughel and J. H. Ratliff. 1915 Presidential orocl�.mation establishing Dinosaur National Monument, totaling 80 acres. 1916 Act creating National Park Service. 1920 Federal Water and Power Act. Provided for creation of the Federal Power Commission to make possible orderly devel­ opment of water rower. Authorization for Federal Fewer Commission to issue licenses for construction of dams upon any pa.rt of the public land and reservation. 1921 Amendment to the Water and P<l'fer Act providing for no authorization of dams or r�servoirs within the limits �s now constit�ted of any National Park or National Monument without the specific authority of Congr�ss. The Dinosaur National Monument as it �.xisted, or was then constituted in 1921, was comprised of a total of 80 acres of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary: Gates of Lodore
    Itinerary: PO Box 1324 Moab, UT 84532 (800) 332-2439 Gates of Lodore: (435) 259-8229 Fax (435) 259-2226 Email: [email protected] 4 Days/3 Nights www.GriffithExp.com T h r o u g h Dinosaur National Monument Overview of Gates of Lodore Meeting Place Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 Meeting Time : 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) The evening before your trip Orientation: 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) the day BEFORE d e p a r t u r e H e r e you will learn what to expect and prepare for, receive your dry bags, sign Assumption of Risk forms, and get a chance to ask last minute q u e s t i o n s . Morning Place : Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 M o r n i n g T i m e : 7 : 0 0 a m (MDT) Return Time : Approximately 5 : 0 0 - 6 : 0 0 P M Rapid Rating: C l a s s I I I - I V (water level dependent) # of Rapids : 11 River Miles: 45 P u t i n : Gates of Lodore Ranger Station T a k e - out : Split Mountain boat ramp Trip Length: 4 D a y s / 3 N i g h t s Raft Type(s): O a r b o a t s , Paddleboats and Inflatable Kayaks Age Limit: Minimum Age is 8 y e a r s o l d What makes this trip special? The Gates of Lodore on the Green River has all the elements of a classic river trip: great hikes, exciting whitewater, beautiful beaches and colorful history.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks of the Colorado River Basin
    National Parks of the Colorado River Basin Water ManageMent, resource threats, and econoMics • april 2011 SINCE 1919, NPCA has been the leading voice of the American people in protecting and enhancing our National Park System. NPCA, its members, and partners work together to protect the park system and preserve our nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage for generations to come. • More than 325,000 members • Twenty-three regional and field offices • More than 120,000 activists More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are compromised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollution, invasive plants and animals, and increases in motorized recreation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the condition of critical resources within their parks, and knowledge about system-wide issues is also incomplete. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and cultural resources in individual national parks. To date, 80 parks have been studied. Recently, the Center for State of the Parks (CSOTP) turned its attention to issues affecting the National Park System as a whole. Because of this change in focus, CSOTP changed its name to the Center for Park Research (CPR). The Center for Park Research will deliver scientific information on systemic issues affecting national parks and their solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of the Bureau of Reclamation
    Brief History of The Bureau of Reclamation Glen Canyon Under Construction Colorado River Storage Project - April 9, 1965 Photographer - unknown 2 THE MOVEMENT FOR RECLAMATION Only about 2.6 percent of the earth's water supply is fresh, and some two-thirds of that is frozen in icecaps and glaciers or locked up in some other form such as moisture in the atmosphere or groundwater. That leaves less than eight-tenths of 1 percent of the earth’s water, about 30 percent of fresh water, available for humankind’s use. The largely arid American West receives a distinctly small share of that available supply of fresh water. As a result, water is a dominating factor in the arid West’s prehistory and history because it is required for occupation, settlement, agriculture, and industry. The snowmelt and gush of spring and early summer runoff frustrated early Western settlers. They watched helplessly as water they wanted to use in the dry days of late summer disappeared down Western watercourses. Settlers responded by developing water projects and creating complicated Western water law systems, which varied in detail among the various states and territories but generally allocated property rights in available water based on the concept of prior appropriation (first in time, first in right) for beneficial use. At first, water development projects were simple. Settlers diverted water from a stream or river and used it nearby; but, in many areas, the demand for water outstripped the supply. As demands for water increased, settlers wanted to store "wasted" runoff for later use. Storage projects would help maximize water use and make more water available for use.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES OF DINOSAUR NATIONAL MONUMENT, COLORADO AND UTAH By C. T. Sumsion Open-File Report 76-580 Prepared for the U.S. National Park Service Salt Lake City, Utah August 1976 1 CONTENTS Page English-to-metric conversion factors-- . -- . 8 Abstract 10 Introduction H Purpose 11 Previous investigations and acknowledgments H Well- and spring-numbering system .12 Geographic setting 13 Physiography and drainage 1" Climate ....... ..... ... .. .... ... 17 Vegetation 1^ Geologic setting 1 Stratigraphy ** S true ture ........ ............... 24 Water resources ^5 Surface water ^5 Green River . ..................... 26 Yampa River 30 Pool Creek 34 Jones Hole Creek 36 Cub Creek 39 Ground water 41 Monument headquarters area 44 Gates of Lodore area ^7 Zenbbia Basin area ^8 CONTENTS Continued Page Water resources continued Ground water continued Deerlodge Park area --- 49 "Castle Park area 50 Echo Park area 51 Blue Mountain area 59 Jones Hole area 60 Island Park area- ' 61 Cub Creek area 62 Dinosaur Quarry area 62 Split Mountain and Green River campgrounds 63 Summary 64 Selected references------------ 65 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Geologic and hydrologic map of Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado and Utah In Pocket Figure 1. Diagram showing well- and spring-numbering system in Utah and Colorado 14 2. Index map showing major geographic features of Dinosaur National Monument and vicinity 15 3. Graph showing average monthly and annual temper­ atures and precipitation at Dinosaur Quarry, 4. Flood-frequency curves, Yampa River near Maybell and Little Snake River near Lily, Colo 33 5.. Flood-frequency curve, Pool Creek at Echo Park, Colo 35 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur National Monument Foundation Document Overview
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. Foundation Document Overview. Dinosaur National Monument. Utah / Colorado. Contact Information, For more information about the Dinosaur National Monument Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (435) 781-7700 or write to: Superintendent, Dinosaur National Monument, 4545 E. Highway 40, Dinosaur, CO 81610 Purpose. Significance. Significance statements express why Dinosaur National Monument resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. • The world famous Carnegie Quarry provides a remarkable window onto the Late Jurassic world of dinosaurs. There the National Park Service pioneered the in situ (in place) preservation of fossils, with 1,500 dinosaur bones available for viewing, touching, and study. This approach has served as a model for many other fossil sites around the world. • Dinosaur National Monument displays the most complete geological record of any national park unit. The 23 rock formations and their fossils reveal vast environmental and DINOSAUR NATIONAL MONUMENT biological changes over 1.1 billion years of Earth history, protects, studies, and provides access spanning the Pre-Cambrian to Cenozoic eras. Powerful to extraordinary fossil deposits of geologic forces have uplifted, eroded, and exposed these dinosaurs and other life, a record layers in spectacular faults, folds, and canyons that continue of thousands of years of human to inspire new questions for general visitors as well as for occupation and use, and the wild and professional geologists and paleontologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friend : UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 520 Rood
    UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 520 Rood Avenue Grand Junction, Colorado March 5, 1954 Dear Friend : Here is an opportunity for you to help the 17 Reclamation Jtates in connection with an issue that is of importance to all of them. Tho issue is whether we shall be permitted to use a small part of the Dinosaur National · Monument for water storage purposes to meet acute human needs. The following information on the subject is an excerpt from my statement before the Irrigation Sub-Committee of the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, at hearings recently held. If you want to help us , won't you write or wire Secretary of the Interior Douglas McKay and your Senators and Congressmen telling them how you feel about the authorization of Echo Park dam? Won 't you pass this information along to your friends and ask them to do the same? We need your help immediately to counteract a huge letter-writing campaign being fostered by nature lovers who want to preserve the West as a national museum. The opposition to the Echo Park unit is founded upon worthy sentiment by undoubtedly sincere organizations and individuals who fear that such authori­ zation might set a precedent for the use of other res.erved areas for water storage purposes. For a ready understanding of the issues involved, it may be well to examine the background of tho proposed authorization of the Echo Park unit. In accordance with the spirit and purpose of certain pertinent provisions of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Dammed: an Analysis of the Fight to Defeat Echo
    DINOSAUR DAMMED: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIGHT TO DEFEAT ECHO PARK DAM by Debra Elaine Jenson A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Communication The University of Utah December 2014 2 Copyright © Debra Elaine Jenson 2014 All Rights Reserved 3 The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL The dissertation of DeBra Elaine Jenson has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: KimBerley Mangun , Chair May 1, 2014 Date Approved Glen M. Feighery , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved Sean T. Lawson , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved David J. VergoBBi , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved Matthew Baker , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved and by Kent Alan Ono , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Communication and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. 4 ABSTRACT In the early twentieth century, the United States Bureau of Reclamation proposed a series of dams along the Colorado River to help control the violent and destructive fluctuations of the river that ran through six western states. The sites of two of the dams, Echo Park and Split Mountain, were located inside Dinosaur National Monument (a little known and rarely visited area straddling the border between Utah and Colorado). Conservation organizations across the United States joined together to fight the Echo Park and Split Mountain project. One coalition, the Council of Conservationists, consisted of nine groups including the Sierra Club, the American Planning and Civic Association, and the Wilderness Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Rusho, W. L. Bumby Road for Glen Canyon
    BUMPY ROAD FOR GLEN CANYON DAM by W.L. Rusho Basic Concept and Purpose Probably no dam built in America has proved to be so controversial as Glen Canyon Dam. Built in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, the dam was planned and designed to be a contributor in a long dream to subdue and conquer the earth, or as was often heard in pioneer days, “to make the desert blossom as the rose.” Its basic purpose was to allow increased irrigation and other water development in the entire Upper Basin of the Colorado River, including Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and New Mexico. My experience with the dam is intensely personal, as I had been employed during its construction as Public Affairs Officer for the Bureau of Reclamation. For over five years during the construction I rode the monkeyslides, conducted tours for reporters and dignitaries, wrote articles and news releases, drafted speeches, conducted ceremonies, produced motion pictures, and directed the guide service and all photography. In late 1963, when the dam was virtually finished, I was transferred to the Salt Lake City BR Regional Office, which had jurisdiction over Glen Canyon Dam. From that time on I continued to be regularly involved in developments at the dam, both by many personal visits and by reports from others. Even after my retirement in 1988, I worked as a contractor producing motion pictures concerning operation of the dam and it’s effect on the Grand Canyon.. Considered as a lineal descendant of the many dams constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation, Glen Canyon Dam was not unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing Echo Park: Recreation's Forgotten History
    Experiencing Echo Park: Recreation’s Forgotten History Sara Porterfield University of Colorado, Boulder Colorado River Upper Basin Forum 2 November 2017 The Grand Overhang on the Yampa River Lodore Canyon, Green River Source: Harvey, A Symbol of Wilderness Echo Park Confluence of the Green & Yampa Rivers Hetch Hetchy Valley, pre-dam Source: SFGate Hetch Hetchy Valley, pre-dam Source: SFGate Source: Sierra Club Hetch Hetchy Valley, pre-dam Source: SFGate Source: Sierra Club David Brower, Source: Sierra Club Hetch Hetchy Valley, pre-dam Source: SFGate Source: Sierra Club Glen Canyon Dam Source: Bureau of Reclamation David Brower, Source: Sierra Club “A pastime long considered escapism was actually intensely engaged with the broader world.” (Joseph Taylor, Pilgrims of the Vertical, 3) Source: University of Utah Marriott Library Special Collections Don (left) & Bus Hatch Source: Webb, Riverman Source: Sierra Club, This is Dinosaur Bus Hatch Source: Hatch River Expeditions Sierra Club on the Yampa with Hatch, c. 1953 Hatch River Expeditions & Sierra Club on the Yampa River Source: Sierra Club, Wilderness River Trail Source: Sierra Club, This Is Dinosaur Source: University of Utah Marriott Library Special Collections “Hope I’m not taking up too much of your valuable time with my flood of letters, but feel you may run across something in them that will help our cause.” Don Hatch to David Brower, 6 February 1954 “I wish I could make it clear to you how important your letters are so that you would never write such a paragraph as the one in which
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees for Conservation Records BANC MSS 74/71 C
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c82v2n7h No online items Finding Aid to the Trustees for Conservation records BANC MSS 74/71 c Lori Dedeyan The Bancroft Library 2017 The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/libraries/bancroft-library Finding Aid to the Trustees for BANC MSS 74/71 c 1 Conservation records BANC MSS 74/71 c Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Trustees for Conservation records Creator: Trustees for Conservation Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 74/71 c Physical Description: 5.2 Linear Feet(4 cartons, 1 slim document box) Date (inclusive): 1951-1975 Abstract: This collection contains the records of the Trustees for Conservation, a California environmental organization formed in 1954. The records document the legislative and fundraising activity of the Trustees for several major projects and campaigns, including the passage of the Wilderness Act of 1964, the California State Park System, the San Francisco Bay Shoreline and Point Reyes National Seashore, and opposition to the Echo Park Dam on the Colorado River at the Dinosaur National Monument. Included are correspondence, financial records, legal documents, administrative records and meeting minutes, and program documents from the Trustees for Conservation and other environmental organizations, notably the Wilderness Society and Sierra Club. Language of Material: Collection materials are in English. Many of the Bancroft Library collections are stored offsite and advance notice may be required for use. For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the library's online catalog.
    [Show full text]