DOCSLIB.ORG

Dinosaur Dammed: an Analysis of the Fight to Defeat Echo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dinosaur Dammed: an Analysis of the Fight to Defeat Echo DINOSAUR DAMMED: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIGHT TO DEFEAT ECHO PARK DAM by Debra Elaine Jenson A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Communication The University of Utah December 2014 2 Copyright © Debra Elaine Jenson 2014 All Rights Reserved 3 The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL The dissertation of DeBra Elaine Jenson has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: KimBerley Mangun , Chair May 1, 2014 Date Approved Glen M. Feighery , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved Sean T. Lawson , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved David J. VergoBBi , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved Matthew Baker , Member May 1, 2014 Date Approved and by Kent Alan Ono , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Communication and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. 4 ABSTRACT In the early twentieth century, the United States Bureau of Reclamation proposed a series of dams along the Colorado River to help control the violent and destructive fluctuations of the river that ran through six western states. The sites of two of the dams, Echo Park and Split Mountain, were located inside Dinosaur National Monument (a little known and rarely visited area straddling the border between Utah and Colorado). Conservation organizations across the United States joined together to fight the Echo Park and Split Mountain project. One coalition, the Council of Conservationists, consisted of nine groups including the Sierra Club, the American Planning and Civic Association, and the Wilderness Society. These nine groups used their official publications to reach out to their members, rallying them to act in defense of Dinosaur National Monument and the National Park System as a whole. This dissertation analyzes the nine publications from 1950 to 1956—the years of the most heated debate—for a better understanding of the strategies and themes used in this, the first successful campaign of the modern conservation movement. 5 To my family. You know who you are. 6 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………..iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………………………….viii CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION: WHAT POWELL SAW…………………………….1 The National Park System and the West…………………………5 Water and the West………...….………………………………….9 Waging War……………………………………………………..13 Study Design and Method……………………………………….18 Chapter Outline………………………………………………….24 2 HISTORICAL METHOD AND THEMATIC ANALYSIS.……………26 3 SIERRA CLUB: HOW DAVID HELPED SLAY GOLIATH…….........37 Building a Coalition…………………………………………..…54 4 AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: A NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM……………………………………………………….…69 Beauty and the Bureaucracy ……………….……………..…..…78 5 AMERICAN NATURE ASSOCIATION: THE DINOSAUR DOMINOS……………………..………………………………………..85 The Duty to Defend………………...…………..………….…...101 6 NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: DINOSAUR GOES TO THE BIRDS…………………………………………………………………..113 One Nation Under God…………………..……………….….…119 7 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: HOW THE SAUSAGE IS MADE……..............................................................................................128 Wilderness and Wise Use………………………………..…......140 8 8 IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE: THE GLOVES COME OFF…………..160 Invasion!......................................................................................171 9 NATIONAL PARKS ASSOCIATION: SEEING IS BELIEVING…....184 A Parks Principle…………………………………………….…200 10 AMERICAN PLANNING AND CIVIC ASSOCIATION: BRING IN AN EXPERT…………………….……………………………………..215 The Numbers Game………………………………………..…...231 11 THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: THE TIME IS NOW!........................251 A Movement Is Made……………………..……………………263 12 CONCLUSION: THE LESSONS WE LEARNED…………………….277 APPENDIX: MAPS…………………………………………………………………….295 vii 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the patient guidance and skillful editing of my advisor, Kimberley Mangun. She spent countless hours working with me. Her support and encouragement have been invaluable, and her feedback and expertise helped make me a better researcher and writer. Thanks, also, to the members of my committee. I appreciate the time and effort they have dedicated to this project. My husband, Keith, has spent seven years listening to me talk about every aspect of this process. He has never been there, but he knows more about Echo Park and Dinosaur National Monument than most people who live in Vernal, Utah. His love and support are endless, and he has taken on so many parenting duties while I have been researching and writing. Thank you for putting up with this whole thing just because I wanted to wear a poufy hat to college graduations. And to my children I say, thank you for being content with spending time next to me while I write. I look forward to attending your soccer games without a white binder in my lap. Thank you to my mom and dad. I’m happy to be able to report to them that my book report is done. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: WHAT POWELL SAW Standing opposite the rock, our words are repeated with startling clearness, but in a soft, mellow tone, that transforms them into magical music. Scarcely can you believe it is the echo of your own voice. In some places two or three echoes come back; in other places they repeat themselves, passing back and forth across the river between this rock and eastern wall…. Some of the party aver that ten or twelve repetitions can be heard.” —John W. Powell, The Exploration of the Colorado and Its Canyons—1869 On the border between Utah and Colorado, the Yampa and Green Rivers meet in the shadows of 800-foot rock walls that rise so dramatically they appear to go on forever. John Wesley Powell, one of the first white Americans to explore this region, was delighted and thrilled at what he saw as he and his team rode the rapids. Powell’s team named the confluence of the two rivers Echo Park (later to be named Steamboat Rock because of its striking similarity to the prow of a ship) and they camped there for almost a week before continuing down the Green River. Voices of the past still linger along the Green River—etched into the walls in petroglyphs just off the banks and in the voices of campers and river enthusiasts that still reverberate across the river in Echo Canyon. Farther south, after the Green merges with the Colorado River in southeastern Utah, the water has carved miles of canyons, breathtaking arches, and natural crossing points for humans migrating and exploring the landscape. But here, the echoes come from below millions of acre-feet1 of water. Cave 1 An acre-foot is the amount of water it would take to cover an acre of land with water one foot deep. 2 drawings and family dwellings now lie beneath the surface of Glen Canyon Reservoir. The etchings in stone made by members of the Powell expedition down the river are now covered by the “lake” that bears their leader’s name. During the twentieth century, the flow of Americans cut a wide path across the continent, settling in Western states, establishing urban and suburban oases in vast deserts, changing the landscape like its own river. World War II turned this stream of people into a torrent, with military projects, army bases, and massive population growth in the desert states of Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and California. This human swell created new areas of habitation that led to a dual need for water and power, and rivers were diverted from the ancient pathways that had steadily whittled vast canyons into the landscape to run in more convenient patterns. Dams were erected in an effort to satisfy the exploding needs of power and irrigation. New pathways were created and old landmarks were destroyed. Engineers created rivers and lakes with the construction of a dam, even as they erased hundreds and thousands of years of human history. The importance of this body of water cannot be overstated. The Colorado River stands as one of America’s great rivers, with water flowing through seven states from the Rocky Mountains to the Gulf of California.2 The Colorado and its tributaries reach roughly 22 percent of the land in the United States, yet according to Susan Neel, “The Colorado River is a geographical irony because the land through which it flows is the most arid region in America—an area once called the Great American Desert. … There was water in this desert land but it cared not for the needs of man.”3 Even more important 2 United States Bureau of Reclamation, “Upper Colorado River Basin,” www.usbr.gov/uc/, (accessed April 1, 2013). 3 Susan M. Neel, “Utah and the Echo Park Dam Controversy” (master’s thesis, University of Utah, 1980), 14-15. 3 to the people of the Colorado River Basin was the fact that the river was not like the great rivers of the East—miles across with a smooth surface suitable for a steamboat or Huck Finn. For the people who lived and farmed along the Colorado, it indeed was a “natural menace” that taunted them with its unpredictable flow, frequent flooding, and crashing rapids that smashed boats to smithereens and took a person involuntarily miles downstream. Following World War II, the demand for water in the West reached a pitch that could not be ignored—an estimated eight million people were transplanted to these desert states, creating boom towns including Denver, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas—and the Bureau of Reclamation and the Department of the Interior hatched a plan to harness the Colorado River through a series of dams stretching from northern Colorado down to Arizona.4 Engineers and planners from the Bureau approached this as a way to conquer an enemy, writing, “Yesterday the Colorado River was a natural menace. Unharnessed, it tore through deserts, flooded fields, and ravaged villages. … Man was on the defensive. He sat helplessly to watch the Colorado River waste itself, or attempted in vain to halt its destruction.”5 The plan, known as the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP),6 was hatched in the early 1940s but was officially introduced in Congress in 1953.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Act and Howard Zahniser
    WILDERNESS ACT AND HOWARD ZAHNISER In: The Fully Managed, Multiple-Use Forest Era, 1960-1970 Passage of the Wilderness Act of 1964 involved decades of work on the part of many people both inside the Forest Service and from a variety of interest groups. As early as the 1910’s and 1920’s, there were several important proponents of wilderness designation in the national forests. Three men are considered pivotal in these early years and all were Forest Service employees: Aldo Leopold, Arthur H. Carhart, and Robert Marshall. Their efforts were successful at the local level in creating administratively designated wilderness protection for several areas across the country. At the national policy level, there was a series of policy decisions (L-20 and U Regulations) in the 1920’s and 1930’s that made wilderness and primitive area designation relatively easy, but what was lacking was a common standard of management across the country for these areas. Also, since these wilderness and primitive areas were administratively designated, the next Chief or Regional Forester could “undesignate” any of the areas with the stroke of a pen. Howard C. Zahniser, executive secretary of the Wilderness Society (founded by Bob Marshall), became the leader in a movement for congressionally designated wilderness areas. In 1949, Zahniser detailed his proposal for Federal wilderness legislation in which Congress would establish a national wilderness system, identify appropriate areas, prohibit incompatible uses, list potential new areas, and authorize a commission to recommend changes to the program. Nothing much happened to the proposal, but it did raise the awareness for the need to protect wilderness and primitive areas from all forms of development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 USFWS Conservation History Journal
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conservation History Women in Conservation Volume IV, No. 1 (2020) The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Stay connected with us: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service History National Conservation Training Center @USFWS History CONSERVATION HISTORY 2020 Contents From the Historian Lucille Stickel: Pioneer Woman in ii Mark Madison, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Historian and 37 Conservation Research Founder, Conservation History Matthew C. Perry, Heritage Committee Member, Retired, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Whose Stories Are We Missing? iii Maria E. Parisi, Conservation History Editor, Heritage The Legacy and Lessons of Celia Hunter and Partnerships Branch, National Conservation 41 Roger Kaye, Wilderness Coordinator, Alaska Region, Training Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Women’s History Is Women’s Right “Unremarkable,” Helen Fenske’s Unlikely Legacy 1 Catherine Woodward, Biologist, National Conservation 45 Marilyn Kitchell and Jonathan Rosenberg, Great Swamp Training Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Saving Birds over Tea, Sylvia Earle: A Hero for the Planet 5 Harriet Lawrence Hemenway and Minna B. Hall 49 Pete Leary, National Wildlife Refuge System, Paul Tritaik, Heritage Committee Member, South U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Atlantic-Gulf and Mississippi Basin Regions, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mollie Beattie: The Service’s First Female Director 53 Dan Ashe, Association of Zoos and Aquariums Through the Opera Glass, Florence Merriam Bailey 9 Paul Tritaik, Heritage Committee Member, South Our Beliefs Matter: The Mamie Parker Journey Atlantic-Gulf and Mississippi Basin Regions, 57 Mamie Parker, Former Northeast Service Regional Director U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Club Office of the Executive Director Records, Creator: Sierra Club
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb300008hk No online items Sierra Club Office of the Executive Director Records BANC MSS 2002/230 c Finding aid written by Elizabeth Stephens, Tanya Hollis. Funding for processing the David Brower papers provided by Mr. and Mrs. Brian Maxwell. The Bancroft Library The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 (510) 642-6481 [email protected] Sierra Club Office of the Executive BANC MSS 2002/230 c 1 Director Records BANC MSS 2002/230 c Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Sierra Club Office of the Executive Director records, creator: Sierra Club. Executive Director. Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 2002/230 c Physical Description: 65 linear feet15 boxes, 44 cartons, 2 oversize boxes, 24 oversize folders Date (inclusive): 1933-1997 Abstract: The Sierra Club Office of the Executive Director Records contain the office files of the Executive Directors and may include correspondence, memos, board and committee minutes, reports and other documents relating to club administration, policy and procedure. The bulk of the collection pertains to the club's Conservation Program and includes information about specific projects as well as research files containing reports and other print materials on related issues. Language of Material: Collection materials are in English. Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Restrictions Collection is open for research. Publication Rights Copyright has not been assigned to The Bancroft Library. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Head of Public Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness, Recreation, and Motors in the Boundary Waters, 1945-1964
    Sound Po lit ics SouWildernessn, RecdreatioPn, ano d Mlotoris itn theics Boundary Waters, 1945–1964 Mark Harvey During the midtwentieth century, wilderness Benton MacKaye, executive director Olaus Murie and his preservationists looked with growing concern at the wife Margaret, executive secretary and Living Wilderness boundary waters of northeast Minnesota and northwest editor Howard Zahniser, University of Wisconsin ecolo - Ontario. Led by the Friends of the Wilderness in Minne - gist Aldo Leopold, and Forest Service hydrologist Ber- sota and the Wilderness Society in the nation’s capital, nard Frank. 1 preservationists identified the boundary waters as a pre - MacKaye’s invitation to the council had identified the mier wilderness and sought to enhance protection of its boundary waters in richly symbolic terms: magnificent wild lands and waterways. Minnesota’s con - servation leaders, Ernest C. Oberholtzer and Sigurd F. Here is the place of places to emulate, in reverse, the Olson among them, played key roles in this effort along pioneering spirit of Joliet and Marquette. They came to with Senator Hubert H. Humphrey. Their work laid the quell the wilderness for the sake of civilization. We come foundation for the federal Wilderness Act of 1964, but it to restore the wilderness for the sake of civilization. also revived the protracted struggles about motorized re c - Here is the central strategic point from which to reation in the boundary waters, revealing a deep and per - relaunch our gentle campaign to put back the wilderness sistent fault line among Minnesota’s outdoor enthusiasts. on the map of North America. 2 The boundary waters had been at the center of numer - ous disputes since the 1920s but did not emerge into the Putting wilderness back on the continent’s map national spotlight of wilderness protection until World promised to be a daunting task, particularly when the War II ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: the First 50, a Historic Symposium
    Edited by: Steve Chase and Mark Madison 2 Acknowledgments and Sponsors Arctic 50th Historical Special thanks to: Clayton McBride Symposium Planning Team Todd Harless Geoff Haskett, LaVerne Smith, Keith Mantheiy Jay Slack, Director, National and Todd Logan, U.S Fish and Thelma Flynn Conservation Training Center, Wildlife Service, Region 7, Mike Beth Ann Ring U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Boylan, Richard Voss, Larry Bell Laura Creamer Becky Edgar Steve Chase, Chief, Division of Marca Piehuta Education Outreach, National Georgia Jeppesen Conservation Training Center, Sponsors Dawn Lagrotteria U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alicha Burlett Kerrick Reisbig Dr. Mark Madison, Service Historian, National Conservation Gail Testa National Conservation Training Training Center Andrew Weinberg Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service George Krull Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Ben German Jimmy Fox, Region 7, U.S. Tara Lowe Fish and Wildlife Service The Conservation Fund Cynthia Fraula-Hahn David Klinger Maureen Clark, Arctic 50th Voices of the South Shepherd University Department of Coordinator, Region 7, U.S. Contemporary Art and Theater Fish and Wildlife Service Patrick Wallace American Conservation Film Festival Sarah Gannon-Nagle, Strategic And for their efforts and support NCTC ARAMARK Staff Communications Manager, National of this symposium, thanks to: NCTC Raven Services Staff Conservation Training Center, NCTC Security Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service All of our speakers Jay Slack Thelma Flynn, Event Planner, Jim Willis National Conservation Training Kelly Kennedy Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Rollie Jacobs Beth Stevens Dr. Jim Siegel, National Christine Eustis Conservation Training Center, Karin Christensen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • David Ross Brower and Nature's Laws: in Memoriam
    Pace Environmental Law Review Volume 18 Issue 2 Summer 2001 Article 1 June 2001 David Ross Brower and Nature's Laws: In Memoriam Nicholas A. Robinson Pace University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr Recommended Citation Nicholas A. Robinson, David Ross Brower and Nature's Laws: In Memoriam, 18 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 221 (2001) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol18/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Environmental Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PACE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Summer 2001 Number 2 IN MEMORIAM Left to Right: Professor Nicholas A. Robinson, David R. Brower, and Dean Emeritus Richard L. Ottinger, at Pace University School of Law, World Environment Day, June 5, 1997. David Ross Brower and Nature's Laws "We're not blindly opposed to progress. We're opposed to blind progress."1 These words summed up the style and power of David R. Brower. Indelibly, he chiseled toe hold after toe hold on an ar- duous climb across the rock face of the commercial forces driven to seek short-term gain from natural resources and oblivious to the 1. Richard Severo, David Brower, An Aggressive Champion of U.S. Environ- mentalism, Is Dead at 88, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 7, 2000, at C22 (quoting David R. Brower). 1 222 PACE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Expanding Settlement Growing Mechanization “Wilderness protection is paper thin, and the paper should be the best we can get — that Versus upon which Congress prints its Acts.” David Brower, 1956 “Let’s be done with a wilderness preservation program made up of a sequence of threats and defense campaigns! Let’s make a concerted effort for a positive program … where we can be at peace and not forever feel that the wilderness is a battleground.” Howard Zahniser 1951 “If future generations are to remember us with gratitude rather than contempt, we must leave them more than the miracles of technology. We must leave them with a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just after we got through with it”. Lyndon B. Johnson Wilderness Act of 1964 Statement of Policy “ …to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States and its possessions, leaving no lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition…” Sec 2(a) Wilderness Act of 1964 Statement of Policy “…it is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness.” Sec 2(a) The Wilderness Act….. 1. Created a NWPS and established a process for adding new areas NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 1964 9.1 Mil Acres 54 Wilderness Areas 2014 109.8 Mil Acres 762 Wilderness Areas The Wilderness Act….. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm.Con Rec 06-28-67.Pdf (1.149Mb)
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION GRAND JUNCTION PROJECTS OFFICE • REGION 4 P', 0, BOX t'I'ZI IN REPLY REFER TO: GJ•lOO GRAND JUNCTION. COLORADO 81!501 J ul 1 3 1967 Bill Nelson c/o Daily Sentinel 634 Main Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Dear Bill: Enclosed is a copy of a portion of the June 28, 1967, Congressional Record which I agreed to forward to you. Makes mighty interesting reading and I hope you enjoy it. Enclosure June 28, 1907 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE H8245 there must be some increase in State traordinary growth in some areas o! Club was a depressing blow to those who highway income in order to provide the the country. assumed that agency was immune to necessary matching funds to support a The State h ighway offi cials recom­ political machination. It leaves a stench continuing program of the magnitude m ended the establishment of an urban that increases in intensity as the general co ntempla ted. system covering improvements on arte­ public comes to realize the impropriety The highway offi cials are recommend­ rial roads and streets in the urban areas and inequity involved in making an out­ ing a modest extension of the interstate to be selected cooperatively by the States standing patriotic organization the tar­ program to provide for increasing the and t he urban areas involved. get of an absurd and malicious attack. safety and capacity of those interstate A tabulation and summary of the pro­ If anyone doubts that the Sierra Club routes which prove to..be overloaded and gram recommended by the State high­ was singled out for reprisal without jus­ for some limited extension of the system way officials is shown in the accompany­ tification, then he has not read "Colo­ as dictated by population shifts and ex- ing table: rado Water Lobby," by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE a Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System
    A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System A PEW WILDERNESS CENTER RESEARCH REPORT A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System DOUGLAS W. SCOTT Here is an American wilderness vision: the vision of “a wilderness- forever future.” This is not my phrase, it is Howard Zahniser’s. And it is not my vision, but the one that I inherited, and that you, too, have inherited, from the wilderness leaders who went before. A Wilderness-Forever Future. Think about that. It is It is a hazard in a movement such as ours that the core idea bound up in the Wilderness Act, which newer recruits, as we all once were, may know too holds out the promise of “an enduring resource of little about the wilderness work of earlier generations. wilderness.” It is the idea of saving wilderness forever Knowing something of the history of wilderness —in perpetuity. preservation—nationally and in your own state— is important for effective wilderness advocacy. In Perpetuity. Think of the boldness of that ambition! As Zahniser said: “The wilderness that has come to us The history of our wilderness movement and the char- from the eternity of the past we have the boldness to acter and methods of those who pioneered the work project into the eternity of the future.”1 we continue today offer powerful practical lessons. The ideas earlier leaders nurtured and the practical tools Today this goal may seem obvious and worthy, but and skills they developed are what have brought our the goal of preserving American wilderness in per- movement to its present state of achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation of Man ” 1851 • Philosopher • Emerson Transcendentalism
    What are NR’s? • Tangible substance • Function or use What is an environment? • A collection of NR’s in a defined area What is a Ecosystem • All of the ecological processes in a n environment What is wilderness? • Theoretically an undisturbed environment • Big “W” • Little “w” U. S. History and the Environment • Growth of the U.S. • Traditional view of NRs • 1890 closing of the frontier • CidliConservation and population Modern View of the Environment • Technology • Wilderness • Product of civilization • 3rd world European View of Wilderness • European landscape of the 1600s • Perception of wilderness • Basis of bias - RliiReligion - Superstition and folklore Settlers View of the NA Wilderness • Paradise Myth • Reality • Not prepared to live “with” the env. Settlers’ Bias on the Frontier • Safety • Effect of wilderness • Doing God’s work – Manifest Destiny • Wilderness = waste Romanticism • Late 1700s – mid 1800s • Urban, educated , wealthy • Writers and artists • CiCoincid es wi ihhth the growth of sci ences • Enthusiasm for wild places Romanticism • Sublimity • Awe •Deism • GhkhGreat watchmaker theory • Primitivism • The noble savage Start of the American Environmental Movement • Europe = history, cities, culture • USU.S. = Wilderness, NRs • American wilderness = American character • MifDManifest Dest iny Hudson River School • American wild landscape as inspiration • Thomas Cole • First American art form • View o f Amer ican art ist, wri ter, etc Henry David Thoreau • 1817 – 1862 •“In wilderness is the preservation of man ” 1851 • Philosopher
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP, Arizona and Utah
    Contents Glen Canyon Unit ............................................................................................................................2 Project Location...................................................................................................................3 Historic Setting ....................................................................................................................4 Project Authorization .........................................................................................................8 Pre-Construction ................................................................................................................14 Construction.......................................................................................................................21 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water.......................................................................31 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................36 Notes ..................................................................................................................................39 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................46 Index ..................................................................................................................................52 Glen Canyon Unit The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central
    [Show full text]
  • ECHO PARK DAM TRUTHS Echo Park Dam Is Not
    ECHO PARK DAM TRUTHS Echo Park Dam Is Not Invasion. The building of Echo Park Dam in Dinosaur National Monument oes not create a precedent, nor is it an invasion of our National Park system. In the discussions of building th e proposed Echo Park Dam many part-truths, half-truths, and deliberate stretching of the truth have been heard. To clarify the record the following circumstances are enumer­ ated which definitely establish rights for Power and Irrigation projects wjthin th� Dinosaur National Monument. 1904 Brown's Park reservoir site surveyed. Lands withdrawn for Brown's Park or the Green River project October 17, 1904. 1906 Act of Congress providing authority of the President to establish National Monuments. 19Cf7 Brown's Park dam site drilled by Burea of Reclamation. and Total cost to the Bureau of R8clrunation $43,000. 1908 1910 First surveys of Split Mountain dam site by Nile Hughel and J. H. Ratliff. 1915 Presidential orocl�.mation establishing Dinosaur National Monument, totaling 80 acres. 1916 Act creating National Park Service. 1920 Federal Water and Power Act. Provided for creation of the Federal Power Commission to make possible orderly devel­ opment of water rower. Authorization for Federal Fewer Commission to issue licenses for construction of dams upon any pa.rt of the public land and reservation. 1921 Amendment to the Water and P<l'fer Act providing for no authorization of dams or r�servoirs within the limits �s now constit�ted of any National Park or National Monument without the specific authority of Congr�ss. The Dinosaur National Monument as it �.xisted, or was then constituted in 1921, was comprised of a total of 80 acres of land.
    [Show full text]