DOCSLIB.ORG

Dinosaur National Monument Colorado and Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dinosaur National Monument Colorado and Utah National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Dinosaur National Monument Colorado and Utah Dinosaur National Monument Invasive Plant Management Plan & Environmental Assessment October 2005 Invasive Plant Management Plan And Environmental Assessment Dinosaur National Monument October 2005 Abstract Non-native, invasive plants are invading our national parks, causing tremendous damage to our resources, thereby threatening the structure, organization, function, and overall integrity of the natural ecosystems we aspire to protect. Controlling invasive species is a serious challenge facing Dinosaur National Monument – 75 species of non-native plants occur in the monument. Of these, 24 are of particular concern because of their aggressive nature and ability to displace intact, native vegetation communities. This Plan and Environmental Assessment outlines weed management strategies (as alternatives) based on principles of Integrated Pest Management that address the use of controls including some or all of the following: mechanical, cultural, chemical, biological, and prevention techniques. Public Comment We welcome your comments on this Plan and EA. If we receive important new information, or if significant new issues are raised during the public comment period, we will revise the EA. If you wish to comment on the Plan and EA, you may enter them online at the National Park Service website Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (http://parkplanning.nps.gov/) or you may mail comments to the name and address below. The Invasive Plant Management Plan and Environmental Assessment will be on public review for 30 days ending November 17, 2005. Please note that names and addresses of people who comment become part of the public record. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public inspection in their entirety. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this at the beginning of your comment. Mary Risser, Superintendent Dinosaur National Monument 4545 E. Highway 40 Dinosaur, CO 81610 Table of Contents Abstract …………….……………………………….…………………………………….i Public Comment…….…….……….……………………………………………………...i List of Abbreviations….………………….………….……………………………………iv Definitions……………………..…………………….……………………………………iv Summary…………………………………………………………………………………..1 IPM and Its Use in National Parks…………….…………………………………………..2 Alternatives …………………………………………………………………………...…..4 Chapter 1: Purpose and Need Background….…………………………………………………….………..……………1-1 History of Invasive Species and their Management in Dinosaur National Monument……………………...……………………………1-4 Purpose and Need……………………………………………………………………… 1-5 Scope of Plan……………..……………………………………………………………...1-5 Relationship of the Proposed Alternative to Other Monument Plans…………………...1-5 Scoping Issues…………………………………..…………….…………………………1-6 Impact Topics…………………………………..…………….………………………….1-6 Impact Topics Dismissed from Further Consideration……….…..……………………..1-7 Chapter 2: Alternatives Considered Regulatory Measures Common to All Alternatives………………………………………2-1 Invasive Plant Management Planning Considerations……………………………………2-10 Invasive Plant Management Plan…………………………………………………………2-13 Alternative 1……………………………….……………..……………………………….2-25 Alternative 2……………………………………….………………………..………….…2-25 Alternative 3……………………………………….…………………….………………..2-26 Alternatives Considered and Rejected………….……..…………………………………..2-30 Mitigation Measures..……………… …………………………………………………….2-30 Environmentally Preferred Alternative…………….……………………………………..2-41 Chapter 3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences Chapter Organization………………………………………………………………….....3-1 Methodology for Assessing Impacts………………………………………………….….3-1 Intensity of Effects Defined……………………..…………………………………….…3-2 Cumulative Effects Methodology…………………..………………………………...….3-7 Other Past/Present/Anticipated Projects in the Monument………………………………3-7 Compliance with Section 106 NHPA……………………………………………………3-8 Impairment Methodology………………………………………………………………..3-9 Soils and Vegetation……………………………….…………………………………….3-10 Wetlands and Floodplains………………………………………………………………..3-23 Wildlife……………………………………………………………………………...……3-30 Threatened and Endangered Species…………………………………………….………3-38 Water Quality…………………………………………………………………… ……...3-47 ii Wilderness….…………..………………………………………………………………….3-53 Air Quality…….………..…………………………………………………………………3-58 Soundscape…………..……………………………………………………………………3-61 Historic Structures……...……………………………………………………………..…..3-63 Cultural Landscapes…...………………………………………………………………… 3-69 Archeological Resources………………………………………………………………… 3-74 Paleontological Resources……………..………………………………………………… 3-81 Land Use and Park Operations……………………………………………………………3-87 Socioeconomics……………………………………………………………………………3-92 Chapter 4: Consultation, Coordination, and References…..………………………….4-1 Figures Figure 1: Dinosaur National Monument………………………………………………….1-3 Figure 2: Integrated Pest Management Decision Matrix………………………………....2-12 Figure 3: Total Area Surveyed for Invasive Plants in Dinosaur National Monument 2002-2004……………………………………..2-16 Tables Table 1: Summary of Alternatives………………………………………………………..2-27 Table 2: The Degree to Which Each Alternative Meets Invasive Plant Management Plan Objectives……………………………………………..2-43 Table 3: Environmental Impact Summary By Alternative……………………………….2-44 Table 4: Impact Threshold Definitions…………………………………………………...3-3 Table 5: Non-native and Invasive Plants of Colorado and Utah………………………….3-12 Appendices Appendix A: Public Scoping Documents Appendix Appendix B: Users Guide to Integrated Pest Management Decision Matrix Appendix C: Cub Creek Area Weed Management Plan Appendix D: Invasive Plant Prevention Guidelines Appendix E: USFWS Consultation Documentation Appendix F: RAVE Index Appendix G: Adjuvants Approved for Use by the State of California Appendix H: Minimum Tool Analysis Decision Tree for use in Dinosaur National Monument’s Recommended and Potential Wilderness Areas Appendix I: Pesticide Safety Appendix J: Wildlife of Dinosaur National Monument Appendix K: State-listed Animal and Plant Species of Concern Appendix L: (Detailed) Invasive Plant Management Plan and Monument-wide Inventory Results iii List of Abbreviations ATV All Terrain Vehicle APRS Alien Plants Ranking System BLM Bureau of Land Management BMP Best Management Practice CE Categorical Exclusion CNAP Colorado Natural Areas Program CNHP Colorado Natural Heritage Program DINO Dinosaur National Monument DO Director’s Order EA Environmental Assessment EPMT Exotic Plant Management Team ESA Endangered Species Act GPRA Government Performance Results Act IPM Integrated Pest Management IWM Integrated Weed Management MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet NCPN Northern Colorado Plateau Network NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NPS National Park Service NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture LISTED Threatened and Endangered (also includes sensitive species/species of concern) SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFS United States Forest Service USFWS/ FWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service Definitions Several terms are defined to facilitate understanding of this Plan and EA: Native Plant – The NPS defines native plants as all species that have occurred or now occur as a result of natural processes on lands designated as units of the national park system. Native species in a place are evolving in concert with each other (USDI NPS 2001). A goal of the NPS is to perpetuate native plants and animals as part of the natural ecosystem. Exotic Plant – The NPS defines exotic species as those species that occupy or could occupy monument lands directly or indirectly as the result of deliberate or accidental human activities. Because exotic species did not evolve in concert with the species native to the place, it is not a natural component of the natural ecosystem at that place (USDI NPS 2001) Invasive Exotic Plant - An aggressive exotic plant that is known to displace native plant species in otherwise intact native vegetation communities. Invasive exotic species are unwanted plants that are harmful or destructive to humans or other organisms. Not all exotic plants are invasive. This plan addresses only those exotic plants that are determined to be invasive. State Listed Noxious Weeds – Invasive plants prohibited or restricted by Colorado and/or Utah state law. Many of the invasive plants known to occur in DINO fall into this category (please refer to Table 1 on page 19). Transporting seed or parts of these plants or allowing them to seed on one’s property is prohibited. iv Integrated Pest Management (IPM) - also referred to as Integrated Weed Management (IWM) - A decision-making process that coordinates knowledge of pest biology, the environment, and available technology to prevent unacceptable levels of pest damage, by cost- effective means, while posing the least possible risk to people, resources, and the environment (USDI NPS 2001). Eradicate – Completely eliminating all weed plants, including live roots, rhizomes, and seeds. Eradicating a weed species within a management area is very difficult unless it is present in small populations or numbers. Suppress – To reduce abundance of a weed species, typically as measured or estimated in terms of canopy cover or plants density. Contain – To confine an infestation so it does not expand, but does not usually mean reducing the current infestation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing Population Sizes, Biological Potential and Mass
    1. ASSESSING POPULATION SIZES, BIOCONTROL POTENTIAL AND MASS PRODUCTION OF THE ROOT BORING MOTH AGAPETA ZOEGANA FOR AREWIDE IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING OF SPOTTED KNAPWEED BIOCONTROL 2. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Mark Schwarzländer, PSES Department, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter DR MS 2339, Moscow, ID 83844-2339, (208) 885-9319, FAX (208)885- 7760, [email protected]; Joseph Milan, USDI Bureau of Land Management, 3948 Development Ave., Boise, ID 83705, (208) 384-3487, FAX (208) 384-3326, [email protected]; Paul Brusven, Nez Perce Tribe Bio-Control Center, P.O. Box 365, 22776 Beaver Road, Lapwai, ID 83540, (208) 843-9374, FAX (208) 843-9373, [email protected] 3. COOPERATORS: Dr. Hariet Hinz (CABI Switzerland), Dr. Urs Schaffner (CABI Switzerland, Dr. Sanford Eigenbrode (University of Idaho), Dr. Heinz Müller-Schärer (University of Fribourg, Switzerland), Brian Marschmann (USDA APHIS PPQ State Director, Idaho), Dr. Rich Hansen (USDA APHIS CPHST, Ft. Collins, Colorado), John (Lewis) Cook (USDI BIA Rocky Mountain Region, Billings, Montana), Dr. John Gaskin (USDA ARS NPARL, Sidney, Montana), Idaho County Weed Superintendents and Idaho-based USFS land managers. BCIP CONTACT: Carol Randall, USFS Northern and Intermountain Regions, 2502 E Sherman Ave, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814, (208) 769-3051, (208) 769-3062, [email protected] 4. REQUESTED FUNDS: USFS $100,000 (Year 1: $34,000; Year 2: $33,000; and Year 3: $33,000), Project Leveraging: University of Idaho $124,329. 5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 1) The current status of ecological research suggests that albeit having some impact on spotted knapweed, both, A. zoegana and C. achates have stronger negative effects on native grasses, thus indirectly benefiting one of most devastating invasive plants in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Japanese Kateretidae Fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 9.xii.2011 Volume 51(2), pp. 551–585 ISSN 0374-1036 A review of the Japanese Kateretidae fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Sadatomo HISAMATSU Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Tarumi 3–5–7, Matsuyama, 790–8566 Japan; e–mail: [email protected] Abstract. The family Kateretidae of Japan is revised. Nine species belonging to 6 genera are recognized, including: Kateretes japonicus Hisamatsu, 1985, K. takagii S-T. Hisamatsu, 2006, Platamartus jakowlewi Reitter, 1892, Heterhelus (Heterhelus) scutellaris (Heer, 1841), H. (Heterhelus) morio (Reitter, 1878), H. (Boreades) solani (Heer, 1841), Sibirhelus corpulentus (Reitter, 1900), Brachyp- terus urticae (Fabricius, 1792), and Brachypterolus pulicarius (Linnaeus, 1758). Heterhelus morio, which was synonymized under H. scutellaris by KIREJTSHUK (1989), is found to be a valid species, and is herein resurrected. Platamartus jakowlewi is newly recorded from Japan. Brachypterolus shimoyamai Hisamatsu, 1985, syn. nov., is synonymized under Brachypterolus pulicarius. Dorsal habitus images, illustrations of male and female genitalia, and other important diagnostic characters are provided for all species. A key for identifi cation of all Japanese taxa is also provided. Key words. Coleoptera, Kateretidae, taxonomy, new synonym, new record, key, Japan, Palaearctic Region Introduction The family Kateretidae, belonging to the superfamily Cucujoidea, is mainly distributed in the Holarctic Region, and comprises about 95 species within 14 genera worldwide (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010). Both larval and adult Kateretidae are anthophagous: the larvae are monophagous or oligophagous, while adults are more generalized feeders, occurring on true host plants only during mating and ovipositing periods; otherwise, they feed on a broader assortment of fl owering plants (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Operations for Flaming Gorge Dam Water Year 2013
    Annual Report of Operations For Flaming Gorge Dam Water Year 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior January 2015 Bureau of Reclamation Table of Contents Annual Report of Operations for Flaming Gorge Dam ............................................................ 1 Operational Decision Process for Water Year 2013 ................................................................. 2 Step 1: Flow Requests for Research, and Other Federal, State and Stakeholder Input ........ 2 Step 2: Development of Spring Proposal .............................................................................. 4 Step 3: Solicitation of Comments ........................................................................................ 4 Step 4: Final Decision .......................................................................................................... 4 Basin Hydrology and Operations .............................................................................................. 5 Progression of Inflow Forecasts............................................................................................ 5 Summary of Flaming Gorge Operations ............................................................................... 6 Spillway Inspection ............................................................................................................... 8 Flow Objectives Achieved in Water Year 2013 ....................................................................... 8 Spring Flow Objectives......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tiny Fossil Sheds Light on Miniaturization of Birds
    Retraction Tiny fossil sheds light on miniaturization of birds Roger B. J. Benson Nature 579, 199–200 (2020) In view of the fact that the authors of ‘Hummingbird-sized dinosaur from the Cretaceous period of Myanmar‘ (L. Xing et al. Nature 579, 245–249; 2020) are retracting their report, I wish to retract this News & Views article, which dealt with this study and was based on the accuracy and reproducibility of their data. Nature | 22 July 2020 ©2020 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All rights reserved. drives the assembly of DNA-PK and stimulates regulation of protein synthesis. And, although 3. Dragon, F. et al. Nature 417, 967–970 (2002). its catalytic activity in vitro, although does so further studies are required, we might have 4. Adelmant, G. et al. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 11, 411–421 (2012). much less efficiently than can DNA. taken a step closer to deciphering the 5. Britton, S., Coates, J. & Jackson, S. P. J. Cell Biol. 202, Taken together, these observations suggest mysterious ribosomopathies. 579–595 (2013). a model in which KU recruits DNA-PKcs to the 6. Barandun, J. et al. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 944–953 (2017). small-subunit processome. In the case of Alan J. Warren is at the Cambridge Institute 7. Ma, Y. et al. Cell 108, 781–794 (2002). kinase-defective DNA-PK, the mutant enzyme’s for Medical Research, Hills Road, Cambridge 8. Yin, X. et al. Cell Res. 27, 1341–1350 (2017). inability to regulate its own activity gives the CB2 OXY, UK. 9. Sharif, H. et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cochylini Del 2
    Cochylini del 2 Agapeta, Eupoecilia, Aethes (part.) Agapeta hamana (L.) 4268 15-25 mm. Imago flyver sidst på dagen og kommer fint til lys fra maj til august (september). Ikke alle eksem- plarer er så stærkt tegnet som ovenstående. Agapeta hamana (L.) Larven lever overvintrende i i rødderne af forskellige tidsler (Carduus, Cirsium mv.). Udbredt i Europa op til Mellemsverige og Finland. Almindelig. Agapeta largana (Rebel) 4270 16-23 mm. Imago er på vingerne i solens sidste stråler fra sidst i juni gennem juli. Lokalt ikke sjælden på enge. Præimaginale stadier er ukendte. Kendt fra Grækenland, Rumænien, Ungarn, det vestlige Østrig og jeg har selv fundet den flere steder i det sydøstlige Frankrig. Agapeta zoegana (L.) 4271 15-24 mm. Imago flyver i de sidste lyse timer og kommer fint til lys i juli-august. Agapeta zoegana (L.) Larven lever overvintrende i rødderne af Blåhat (Knautia) og Knopurt (Centaurea). Den forpupper sig i rødderne. Agapeta zoegana (L.) Ind i mellem dukker eksemplarer op som er formørket i den yderste tredjedel. Disse eksemparer er gerne mindre end normalt. Agapeta zoegana (L.) I Danmark er der ikke mange findesteder i Jylland og arten mangler helt vest for israndslinjen. I det øvrige land er den ikke sjælden, men sjældent talrig. Nordgrænsen går gennem det sydligste Norge, mellemste Sverige og sydlige Finland. Arten når til Ural og Lilleasien. Eugnosta lathoniana (Hb.) 4279 21-27 mm. Imago flyver sidst på dagen fra midt i maj til sidst i juni. Præimaginale stadier er ukendte. Udbredt i det meste af Sydeuropa, mod nord til Tyskland, men herfra kendes ingen konkrete fund.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cuckoo Sheds New Light on the Scientific Mystery of Bird Migration 20 November 2015
    The cuckoo sheds new light on the scientific mystery of bird migration 20 November 2015 Evolution and Climate at the University of Copenhagen led the study with the use of miniature satellite tracking technology. In an experiment, 11 adult cuckoos were relocated from Denmark to Spain just before their winter migration to Africa was about to begin. When the birds were released more than 1,000 km away from their well-known migration route, they navigated towards the different stopover areas used along their normal route. "The release site was completely unknown to the cuckoos, yet they had no trouble finding their way back to their normal migratory route. Interestingly though, they aimed for different targets on the route, which we do not consider random. This individual and flexible choice in navigation indicates an ability to assess advantages and disadvantages of different routes, probably based on their health, age, experience or even personality traits. They evaluate their own condition and adjust their reaction to it, displaying a complicated behavior which we were able to document for the first time in migratory birds", says postdoc Mikkel Willemoes from the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate at the University of Copenhagen. Previously, in 2014, the Center also led a study mapping the complete cuckoo migration route from Satellite technology has made it possible for the first Denmark to Africa. Here they discovered that time to track the complete migration of a relocated during autumn the birds make stopovers in different species and reveal individual responses. Credit: Mikkel areas across Europe and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Raptorial Dinosaur with Exceptionally Long Feathering Provides Insights Into Dromaeosaurid flight Performance
    ARTICLE Received 11 Apr 2014 | Accepted 11 Jun 2014 | Published 15 Jul 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5382 A new raptorial dinosaur with exceptionally long feathering provides insights into dromaeosaurid flight performance Gang Han1, Luis M. Chiappe2, Shu-An Ji1,3, Michael Habib4, Alan H. Turner5, Anusuya Chinsamy6, Xueling Liu1 & Lizhuo Han1 Microraptorines are a group of predatory dromaeosaurid theropod dinosaurs with aero- dynamic capacity. These close relatives of birds are essential for testing hypotheses explaining the origin and early evolution of avian flight. Here we describe a new ‘four-winged’ microraptorine, Changyuraptor yangi, from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China. With tail feathers that are nearly 30 cm long, roughly 30% the length of the skeleton, the new fossil possesses the longest known feathers for any non-avian dinosaur. Furthermore, it is the largest theropod with long, pennaceous feathers attached to the lower hind limbs (that is, ‘hindwings’). The lengthy feathered tail of the new fossil provides insight into the flight performance of microraptorines and how they may have maintained aerial competency at larger body sizes. We demonstrate how the low-aspect-ratio tail of the new fossil would have acted as a pitch control structure reducing descent speed and thus playing a key role in landing. 1 Paleontological Center, Bohai University, 19 Keji Road, New Shongshan District, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province 121013, China. 2 Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA. 3 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 26 Baiwanzhuang Road, Beijing 100037, China. 4 University of Southern California, Health Sciences Campus, BMT 403, Mail Code 9112, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of a Plant-Herbivore System In
    EVALUATION OF A PLANT-HERBIVORE SYSTEM IN DETERMINING POTENTIAL EFFICACY OF A CANDIDATE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT, CORNOPS AQUATICUM FOR WATER HYACINTH, EICHHORNIA CRASSIPES A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of RHODES UNIVERSITY by ANGELA BOWNES December 2008 Abstract Water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes Mart. Solms-Laubach (Pontederiaceae), a free- floating aquatic macrophyte of Neotropical origin, was introduced into South Africa as an ornamental aquarium plant in the early 1900’s. By the 1970’s it had reached pest proportions in dams and rivers around the country. Due to the sustainability, cost efficiency and low environmental risk associated with biological control, this has been a widely used method in an attempt to reduce infestations to below the threshold where they cause economic and ecological damage. To date, five arthropod and one pathogen biocontrol agents have been introduced for the control of water hyacinth but their impact has been variable. It is believed that their efficacy is hampered by the presence of highly eutrophic systems in South Africa in which plant growth is prolific and the negative effects of herbivory are therefore mitigated. It is for these reasons that new, potentially more damaging biocontrol agents are being considered for release. The water hyacinth grasshopper, Cornops aquaticum Brüner (Orthoptera: Acrididae), which is native to South America and Mexico, was brought into quarantine in Pretoria, South Africa in 1995. Although the grasshopper was identified as one of the most damaging insects associated with water hyacinth in its native range, it has not been considered as a biocontrol agent for water hyacinth anywhere else in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary: the Yampa River: 5 Days/4 Nights
    Itinerary: PO Box 1324 Moab, UT 84532 (800) 332-2439 The Yampa River: (435) 259-8229 Fax (435) 259-2226 Email: [email protected] 5 Days/4 Nights www.GriffithExp.com T h r o u g h Dinosaur National Monument O v e r v i e w of The Yampa River Meeting Place Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 Meeting Time : 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) The evening before your trip Orientation: 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) the day BEFORE d e p a r t u r e H e r e you will learn what to expect and prepare for, receive your dry bags, sign Assumption of Risk forms, and get a chance to ask last minute q u e s t i o n s . Morning Place : Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 M o r n i n g T i m e : 7 : 0 0 a m (MDT) Return Time : Approximately 5 : 0 0 - 6 : 0 0 P M Rapid Rating: C l a s s I I I - I V (water level dependent) # of Rapids : 16 River Miles: 72 P u t i n : Deer Lodge Park Ranger Station T a k e - out : Split Mountain boat ramp Trip Length: 5 D a y s / 4 N i g h t s Raft Type(s): O a r b o a t s , Paddleboats and Inflatable Kayaks Age Limit: Minimum Age is 10 y e a r s o l d What makes this trip special? The Yampa River through the Dinosaur National Monument has it all! As the last free-flowing river in the entire Colorado River drainage, the Yampa is incredibly wild in May and June.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Analyses of the Genera Eremopyrum (Ledeb.) Jaub
    Pak. J. Bot., 46(3): 769-774, 2014. MOLECULAR ANALYSES OF THE GENERA EREMOPYRUM (LEDEB.) JAUB. & SPACH AND AGROPYRON GAERTNER (POACEAE) BY PCR METHODS REMZİYE YILMAZ1, EVREN CABİ2* AND MUSA DOGAN3 1Middle East Technical University, Central Laboratory, Molecular Biology & Biotechnology R&D Center, 06530, Ankara, Turkey 2Namık Kemal University, Department of Biology, 59030 Tekirdağ, Turkey, 3Middle East Technical University, Department of Biological Sciences, 06530, Ankara-Turkey *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; Ph: +90-282-2502670 Abstract RAPD-PCR (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction) and Post PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Melting Curve Analysis (MCA) have been used to investigate the pattern of genetic variation among some species in the genera Eremopyrum (Ledeb.) Jaub. & Spach and Agropyron Gaertner (Poaceae). Thirteen primers have been used in the study based on the RAPD-PCR and MCA analyses. Each species produced a distinct pattern of DNA fragments which have been used as a measure of the degree of relationship between species by means of using the RAPD-PCR results with three primers selected for identifying the genetic similarities. Polymorphic melting profiles have been obtained with Post PCR MCA method using three primers. Genetic similarities are calculated for all the species studied with RAPD-PCR and MCA methods, the dendrograms are obtained with the MVSP (Multi Variate Statistical Package) software using UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages) and Jaccard’s Coefficient. Polymorphism between 18 populations of Eremopyrum and 6 Agropyron populations and within the species are determined by using RAPD-PCR and Post PCR melting curve analysis (MCA) respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Download.Jsp (Accessed on 30 May 2021)
    agronomy Article Morphological, Genetic and Biochemical Evaluation of Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy in the Gene Bank Collection VojtˇechHolubec 1,* ,Václav Dvoˇráˇcek 2 , Leona Svobodová Leišová 3 and Sezai Ercisli 4 1 Department of Gene Bank, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, 161 06 Prague, Czech Republic 2 Department of Product Quality, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, 161 06 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Department of Molecular Biology, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, 161 06 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] 4 Department of Horticulture, Agricultural Faculty, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +42-02-3302-2497 Abstract: The Dasypyrum villosum gene bank collection, comprising 32 accessions, was characterized morphologically and genetically for resistance to leaf diseases and for quality parameters of seeds with specific accent to protein polymorphism and protein and starch composition. The collected material represented nearly the whole distribution area in the Mediterranean. For SSR analysis, a set of 40 SSR markers for wheat was selected. A matrix of distances between genotypes was calculated using Simple Matching dissimilarity coefficient in the DARwin software. The collection was scored for resistance to powdery mildew, brown, stripe and stem rusts. A modified SDS-PAGE method Citation: Holubec, V.; Dvoˇráˇcek,V.; with clear interpretation of high and low molecular glutenin subunits (HMW, LMW) was used for Svobodová Leišová, L.; Ercisli, S. Morphological, Genetic and characterization of accessions. Morphological phenotyping revealed considerable diversity allowing Biochemical Evaluation of Dasypyrum the distinguishing of clusters tracing the geographical origin of accessions. Genetic diversity showed villosum (L.) P.
    [Show full text]