DOCSLIB.ORG

Season Rank Market % US Station Date Opened Contract Aprvd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Season Rank Market % US Station Date Opened Contract Aprvd Product Season Rank Market % US Station Date Opened Contract Aprvd. Credit Hold 2nd Run Group Sales Office Dr. Oz 2009/2010 23 Pittsburgh, PA 1.01 WPXI 13-Nov-08 N N O Cox Communications New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 25 Indianapolis, IN 0.974 WTHR 24-Sep-08 N N N The Dispatch Printing Co. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 26 Baltimore, MD 0.963 WBAL 10-Oct-08 N N N Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 32 Columbus, OH 0.809 WSYX 22-Dec-08 N N O Sinclair Broadcast Group New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 34 Cincinnati, OH 0.791 WKRC 29-Sep-08 N N Y Newport Television, Llc Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 35 Milwaukee, WI 0.791 WDJT 15-Oct-08 N N Y Weigel Broadcasting Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 37 San Antonio, TX 0.715 WOAI 8-Oct-08 N N O Newport Television, Llc Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 39 Grand Rapids, MI 0.648 WOOD 24-Oct-08 N N O Lin Broadcasting Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 42 Las Vegas, NV 0.636 KVMY 18-Nov-08 N N Y Sinclair Broadcast Group Los Angeles Dr. Oz 2009/2010 51 Buffalo, NY 0.551 WIVB 21-Nov-08 N N Y Lin Broadcasting New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 52 Providence, RI 0.544 WPRI 13-Nov-08 N N O Lin Broadcasting New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 55 Fresno, CA 0.502 KGPE 4-Dec-08 N N O Clear Channel Television, Inc. Los Angeles Dr. Oz 2009/2010 56 Little Rock, AR 0.495 KATV 1-Dec-08 N N O Allbritton Communications Co. Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 57 Albany, NY 0.486 WNYT 6-Oct-08 N N Y Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 58 Richmond, VA 0.481 WTVR 1-Dec-08 N N O Raycom Media, Inc. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 64 Dayton, OH 0.423 WKEF 5-Nov-08 N N N Sinclair Broadcast Group Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 69 Wichita, KS 0.394 KSAS 10-Nov-08 N N Y Newport Television, Llc Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 78 Paducah, KY 0.344 KFVS 10-Dec-08 N N O Raycom Media, Inc. Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 80 Rochester, NY 0.341 WROC 15-Oct-08 N N Y Nexstar Broadcasting Group,Inc New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 82 Huntsville, AL 0.338 WHNT 8-Oct-08 N N O Local Tv Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 84 Shreveport, LA 0.337 KTAL 19-Nov-08 N N N Nexstar Broadcasting Group,Inc Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 88 Cedar Rapids, IA 0.303 KGAN 12-Nov-08 N N O Sinclair Broadcast Group Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 93 Burlington, VT 0.289 WVNY 17-Nov-08 N N Y Television Station Group New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 96 Savannah, GA 0.279 WJCL 4-Feb-09 N N N Piedmont Television Commns Llc Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 99 Charleston, SC 0.269 WCIV 24-Nov-08 N N Y Allbritton Communications Co. Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 101 Johnstown, PA 0.257 WATM 1-Dec-08 N N O Palm Television New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 106 Lincoln, NE 0.246 KHAS 24-Nov-08 N N N North Platte Television, Inc. Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 107 Fort Wayne, IN 0.241 WISE 9-Dec-08 N N Y New Vision Group Inc. Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 109 Youngstown, OH 0.235 WYTV 22-Jan-09 N N Y Chelsey Broadcasting Co., Llc Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 114 Lansing, MI 0.226 WILX 7-Nov-08 N N N Gray Communications Systems Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 117 Traverse City, MI 0.216 WPBN 19-Dec-08 N N N Barrington Broadcasting Corp. Chicago Dr. Oz 2009/2010 128 Columbus, GA 0.187 WXTX 24-Nov-08 N N O Raycom Media, Inc. Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 134 Wilmington, NC 0.164 WWAY 23-Jan-09 N N O The Liberty Corporation Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 141 Beaumont, TX 0.145 KBMT 4-Feb-09 N N O McKinnon Broadcasting Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 144 Salisbury, MD 0.138 WBOC 5-Feb-09 N N O Draper Communications New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 146 Erie, PA 0.138 WICU 16-Dec-08 N N O SJL Broadcast Management New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 155 Beckley, WV 0.125 WVNS 25-Nov-08 N N Y West Virginia Media Hldngs Llc New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 157 Binghamton, NY 0.121 WIVT 4-Dec-08 N N O Clear Channel Television, Inc. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 159 Wheeling, WV 0.117 WTRF 25-Nov-08 N N Y West Virginia Media Hldngs Llc New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 160 Gainesville, FL 0.114 WGFL 19-Feb-09 N N Y New Age Media Atlanta Dr. Oz 2009/2010 168 Clarksburg, WV 0.095 WDTV 1-Oct-08 N N Y Withers Broadcasting New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 169 Utica, NY 0.093 WKTV 21-Nov-08 N N Y Smith Broadcasting Corp. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 175 Elmira, NY 0.084 WETM 11-Dec-08 N N Y Newport Television, Llc New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 177 Watertown, NY 0.887 WWTI 9-Feb-09 N N O Clear Channel Television, Inc. New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 193 Parkersburg, WV 0.056 WTAP 7-Nov-08 N N O Gray Communications Systems New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 202 Fairbanks, AK 0.032 KTVF 9-Feb-09 N N O Newport Television, Llc Los Angeles Dr. Oz 2009/2010 204 Presque Isle, ME 0.027 WAGM 18-Dec-08 N N Y WAGM-TV, Inc New York Dr. Oz 2009/2010 209 North Platte, NE 0.013 KIIT 10-Mar-09 N N N North Platte Television, Inc. Chicago FedEX Tracking Number Sales Person 797430118927 Phil Martzolf 797425738396 Phil Martzolf 797425837738 Phil Martzolf 796462302900 Phil Martzolf 796457890407 Steve Bernstein Steve Bernstein 796457890407 Andrew Deutscher Steve Bernstein 796462302900 Zack Hernandez 796457890407 Scott Pinker 796462302900 Phil Martzolf 796457890407 Eric Smith Andrew Deutscher 796445780888 Scott Pinker Steve Maddox Scott Pinker 796462302900 Steve Bernstein 796457890407 Steve Bernstein Steve Bernstein 796445780888 Scott Pinker 796462302900 Mark Arrington Mark Arrington 796462302900 Steve Bernstein 796445780888 Scott Pinker Mark Arrington Mark Arrington 796449801381 Scott Pinker Leeann Baker Leeann Baker Leeann Baker Leeann Baker Steve Bernstein 796462302900 Mark Arrington Mark Arrington Mark Arrington 796544706690 Scott Pinker 797430118927 Scott Pinker 797454618284 Scott Pinker 796457890407 Scott Pinker 797454618284 Scott Pinker Mark Arrington 796470751665 Scott Pinker Scott Pinker 796457890407 Scott Pinker 796457890407 Scott Pinker 796449801381 Scott Pinker 796457890407 Eric Smith 796449801381 Scott Pinker Leeann Baker.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief for Respondents
    No. 10-1293 In the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals at Yale FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. ABC, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS LEWIS BOLLARD JONATHAN SIEGEL Counsel for Respondents The Yale Law School 127 Wall Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 432–4992 QUESTIONS PRESENTED The FCC forbids the broadcasting of indecent speech, defined “as material that, in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory activities or organs in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium.” J.A. 49. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the FCC’s definition of indecency violates the Fifth Amendment because it is impermissibly vague. 2. Whether the FCC’s ban on indecency violates the First Amendment because it is not narrowly tailored and because it does not require scienter for liability. i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioners are the Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America. Respondents who were petitioners in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: Fox Television Stations, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc., WLS Television, Inc., KTRK Television, Inc., KMBC Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., and ABC Inc. Respondents who were intervenors in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: NBC Universal, Inc., NBC Telemundo License Co., NBC Television Affiliates, FBC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Network Affiliates, Center for the Creative Community, Inc., doing business as Center for Creative Voices in Media, Inc., and ABC Television Affiliates Association.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Cable Copyright Claims Final List
    2006 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of A(joint claim)@ denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed. Otherwise, all joint copyright owners are listed. Date No Claimant=s Name City State Recvd. 1 Beth Brickell Little Rock Arkansas 7/1/07 2 Moreno/Lyons Productions LLC Arlington Massachusetts 7/2/07 3 Public Broadcasting Service (joint claim) Arlington Virginia 7/2/07 4 Western Instructional Television, Inc. Los Angeles California 7/2/07 5 Noe Corp. LLC Monroe Louisiana 7/2/07 6 MPI Media Productions International, Inc. New York New York 7/2/07 7 In Touch Ministries, Inc. Atlanta Georgia 7/2/07 8 WGEM Quincy Illinois 7/2/07 9 Fox Television Stations, Inc. (WRBW) Washington D.C. 7/2/07 10 Fox Television Stations, Inc. (WOFL) Washington D.C. 7/2/07 11 Fox Television Stations, Inc. (WOGX) Washington D.C. 7/2/07 12 Thomas Davenport dba Davenport Films Delaplane Virginia 7/2/07 13 dick clark productions, inc. Los Angeles California 7/2/07 NGHT, Inc. dba National Geographic 14 Television and Film Washington D.C. 7/2/07 15 Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc. New York New York 7/2/07 16 WSJV Television, Inc. Elkhart Indiana 7/2/07 17 John Hagee Ministries San Antonio Texas 7/2/07 18 Joseph J. Clemente New York New York 7/2/07 19 Bonneville International Corporation Salt Lake City Utah 7/2/07 20 Broadcast Music, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST
    2005 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of "(joint claim)" denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed. Otherivise, all joint copyright owners are listed. Date toto Claimant's Name City State Recvd. In Touch Ministries, Inc. Atlanta Georgia 7/1/06 Sante Fe Productions Albuquerque New Mexico 7/2/06 3 Gary Spetz/Gary Spetz Watercolors Lakeside Montana 7/2/06 The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts Washington D.C. 7/3/06 Hortus, Ltd. Little Rock Arkansas 7/3/06 6 Public Broadcasting Service (joint claim) Arlington Virginia 7/3/06 Western Instructional Television, Inc. Los Angeles Califoniia 7/3/06 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services (joint claim) (Devotional Television Broadcasts) Washington D.C. 7/3/06 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services (joint claim) (Syndicated Television Series) Washington D.C. 7/3/06 10 Berkow and Berkow Curriculum Development Chico California 7/3/06 11 Michigan Magazine Company Prescott Michigan 7/3/06 12 Fred Friendly Seminars, Inc. New York Ncw York 7/5/06 Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York dba Columbia University Seminars 13 on Media and Society New York New York 7/5/06 14 The American Lives II Film Project LLC Walpole Ncw Hampshire 7/5/06 15 Babe Winkelman Productions, Inc. Baxter Minnesota 7/5/06 16 Cookie Jar Entertainment Inc. Montreal, Quebec Canada 7/5/06 2005 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of."(joint claim)" denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Actions 11/21/2007
    Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street SW PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media information 202 / 418-0500 Recorded listing of releases and texts 202 / 418-2222 REPORT NO. 46617 Broadcast Actions 11/21/2007 STATE FILE NUMBER E/P CALL LETTERS APPLICANT AND LOCATION N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N Actions of: 11/15/2007 TELEVISION APPLICATIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE GRANTED AR BALCT-20070705AAR KTVE 35692 PIEDMONT TELEVISION OF Voluntary Assignment of License, as amended MONROE EL DORADO LICENSE From: PIEDMONT TELEVISION OF MONROE/EL DORADO LICENSE E CHAN-10 LLC LLC To: MISSION BROADCASTING, INC. AR , EL DORADO Form 314 Actions of: 11/16/2007 FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR MODIFICATION TO A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DISMISSED WY BMPH-20070622ABG KXMP 166000 WHITE PARK BROADCASTING, Mod of CP to chg INC. E 102.1 MHZ Dismissed per applicant's 11/9/2007 request 11/16/2007 WY , HANNA (no letter sent) WY BMPH-20070628ACH KYPT 166004 WHITE PARK BROADCASTING, Mod of CP to chg INC. E 104.3 MHZ Engineering Amendment filed 09/24/2007 WY , WAMSUTTER Dismissed per applicant's 11/13/2007 request 11/16/2007 (no letter sent) Page 1 of 18 Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street SW PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media information 202 / 418-0500 Recorded listing of releases and texts 202 / 418-2222 REPORT NO. 46617 Broadcast Actions 11/21/2007 STATE FILE NUMBER E/P CALL LETTERS APPLICANT AND LOCATION N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N Actions of: 11/16/2007 TV TRANSLATOR OR LPTV STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DISMISSED TX BNPTVL-20000830BLH NEW 130257 JOHN R.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-138 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-138 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Advanced Television Systems and ) MB Docket No. 87-268 their Impact Upon the Existing ) Television Broadcast Service ) ) SEVENTH REPORT AND ORDER AND EIGHTH FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING Adopted: August 1, 2007 Released: August 6, 2007 Comment Date: [30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] Reply Comment Date: [45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................6 A. The DTV Transition ............................................................................................................6 B. The Channel Election Process and Proposed New DTV Table of Allotments ...................7 C. Allotment Methodology and Evaluation of Interference Conflicts...................................16 III. SEVENTH REPORT AND ORDER ......................................................................................27 A. General Issues....................................................................................................................27 1. Request to add references to pending applications......................................................28 2. Request
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73 Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Broadcast Service; Proposed Rule and Final Rule
    Wednesday, September 26, 2007 Part II Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73 Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Broadcast Service; Proposed Rule and Final Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:58 Sep 25, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26SER2.SGM 26SER2 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2 54720 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 coordinates are specified on a station COMMISSION (TTY). license or construction permit, and the requested change did not result in a Summary of the Seventh Report and 47 CFR Part 73 change of more than three seconds Order [MB Docket No. 87–268; FCC 07–138] latitude or longitude for the station, we 1. In this Seventh Report and Order, are making the requested correction. Advanced Television Systems and the Commission adopts a new Table of Accepting corrections to Appendix B of Their Impact Upon the Existing Allotments for digital television three seconds or less is consistent with Television Broadcast Service (‘‘DTV’’) providing all eligible stations the Commission’s rules, which do not with channels for DTV operations after require a construction permit for such a AGENCY: Federal Communications the DTV transition on February 17, correction before it can be licensed. Commission. 2009. The new DTV Table is the result Three seconds of latitude or longitude is ACTION: Final rule. of informed decisions made by eligible approximately 200 to 300 feet. The licensees and permittees during the stations for which we make such a SUMMARY: The Commission adopts a Commission’s channel election process.
    [Show full text]
  • ABC Affiliates Nor Did the Notice Include Any of the Complaints
    No. 10-1293 In the Supreme Court of the United States -------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., Petitioners, v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. ET AL., Respondents. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., Petitioners, v. ABC, INC. ET AL., Respondents. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit -------------------------------------------------- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION OF RESPONDENTS ABC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOCIATION ET AL. Wade H. Hargrove Counsel of Record Mark J. Prak David Kushner Julia C. Ambrose BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP 150 Fayetteville Street Suite 1600 Raleigh, N.C. 27601 919.839.0300 May 23, 2011 [email protected] [Additional Respondents Listed on Inside Cover] THE LEX GROUPDC 1825 K Street, N.W. Suite 103 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 (800) 856-4419 Fax: (202) 955-0022 www.thelexgroup.com Additional Respondents Joining in Brief in Opposition Citadel Communications, LLC, WKRN, G.P., Young Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc., WKOW Television, Inc., WSIL-TV, Inc., Cedar Rapids Television Company, Centex Television Limited Partnership, Channel 12 of Beaumont, Inc., Duhamel Broadcasting Enterprises, Gray Television Licensee, Inc., KATC Communications, Inc., KATV, LLC, KDNL Licensee, LLC, KETV Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., KLTV/KTRE License Subsidiary, LLC, KSTP-TV, LLC, KSWO Television Company, Inc., KTBS, Inc., KTUL, LLC, KVUE Television, Inc., McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Company, Inc.,
    [Show full text]
  • The FCC's Broadcast Media Ownership And
    . The FCC’s Broadcast Media Ownership and Attribution Rules: The Current Debate Charles B. Goldfarb Specialist in Telecommunications Policy March 29, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42436 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress c11173008 . The FCC’s Broadcast Media Ownership and Attribution Rules: The Current Debate Summary The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) broadcast media ownership rules, which place restrictions on the number of media outlets that a single entity can own or control in a local market or nationally, are intended to foster the three long-standing goals of U.S. media policy— competition, localism, and diversity of voices. The FCC is statutorily required to review these rules every four years to determine whether they continue to serve the public interest or should be modified or eliminated. One part of these rules, the FCC’s attribution rules, identify criteria for determining when an entity holds sufficient ownership or control of a broadcast station that such ownership or control should be attributed to the entity for the purposes of applying the media ownership rules. The FCC proposes eliminating its Radio/Television Cross-Ownership rule because it is no longer needed to foster the goals of diversity of voices and localism. It also proposes modifying its Newspaper/Broadcast Cross-Ownership rule to allow certain types of combinations in the 20 largest markets. It proposes a technical change in its Local Television Ownership Rule, but otherwise would continue to prohibit ownership of two stations in a local market unless one is not among the four highest-ranked stations in the market and, after the combination, there would still be eight independently owned and operating commercial full-power television stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tay 2 3 2011
    No. 10-1293 ~tAY 2 3 2011 OFFK:’E OF U-4E CLERK ~n t~e ~u~reme ~Eeurt e~ t~e ~nite~ ~t~te~ FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., Petitioners, V. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. ET AL., Respondents. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., Petitioners, U. ABC, INC. ET AL., Respondents. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit BRIEF IN OPPOSITION OF RESPONDENTS ABC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOCIATION ET AL. Wade H. Hargrove Counsel of Record Mark J. Prak David Kushner Julia C. Ambrose BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP 150 Fayetteville Street Suite 1600 Raleigh, N.C. 27601 919.839.0300 May 23, 2011 [email protected] [Additional Respondents Listed on Inside Cover] THE LEX GROUPpC ¯ 1825 K Street, N.W. ¯ Suite 103 ¯ Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 ¯ (800) 856-4419 ¯ Fax: (202) 955-0022 ¯ www.thelexgroup.com Additional Respondents Joining in Brief in Opposition Citadel Communications, LLC, WKRN, G.P., Young Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc., WKOW Television, Inc., WSIL-TV, Inc., Cedar Rapids Television Company, Centex Television Limited Partnership, Channel 12 of Beaumont, Inc., Duhamel Broadcasting Enterprises, Gray Television Licensee, Inc., KATC Communications, Inc., KATV, LLC, KDNL Licensee, LLC, KETV Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., KLTV/KTRE License Subsidiary, LLC, KSTP-TV, LLC, KSWO Television Company, Inc., KTBS, Inc., KTUL, LLC, KVUE Television, Inc., McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Company, Inc., Media General Communications Holdings, LLC, Mission Broadcasting,
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Landscape of Television News at a Time of Deregulation: a Case Study of Practitioners in Three Major Markets
    ABSTRACT TITLE OF DOCUMENT: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TELEVISION NEWS AT A TIME OF DEREGULATION: A CASE STUDY OF PRACTITIONERS IN THREE MAJOR MARKETS. Kevin P. Swift, Ph.D., 2013 Directed By: Professor Emerita Maurine H. Beasley, Philip Merrill College of Journalism University of Maryland College Park Broadcast news has undergone monumental changes since 1980. Longstanding rules regarding ownership and practices began to be loosened at this time, forever changing the practice of local broadcast television news. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 stimulated groundbreaking changes as rules of ownership were significantly relaxed. The result was a buying frenzy of television stations by major corporations in some places where small group and local ownership once dominated. The way broadcast news operated was changed dramatically in the years following these changes in policy. The purpose of this research was to gain qualitative knowledge regarding the effects of changes in FCC deregulation policy on practitioners of local broadcast television news during a time of great technological change and audience fragmentation. I examined what effects took place as a result of expanded corporate ownership and policies during this time of an already shifting landscape. To complete this research, which was conducted from 2007 to 2009, broadcast news professionals who had been in the business a minimum of fifteen years were interviewed. I interviewed a total of ten news professionals in three separate large broadcast markets, Washington, D.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Baltimore, Maryland. What I found was that broadcasters felt they had been affected negatively by the changes and were unhappy about the state of the broadcast news business.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC V. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 129 S
    No. 10-1293 In the Supreme Court of the United States FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. ABC, INC., ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI NEAL KUMAR KATYAL Acting Solicitor General Counsel of Record TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General MALCOLM L. STEWART AUSTIN C. SCHLICK Deputy Solicitor General General Counsel JOSEPH R. PALMORE PETER KARANJIA Assistant to the Solicitor Deputy General Counsel General JACOB M. LEWIS THOMAS M. BONDY Associate General Counsel ANNE MURPHY NANDAN M. JOSHI Attorneys Counsel Department of Justice Federal Communications Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Commission [email protected] Washington, D.C. 20554 (202) 514-2217 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the court of appeals erred in invalidat­ ing a finding by the Federal Communications Commis­ sion (FCC) that a broadcast including expletives was indecent within the meaning of statutory and regulatory prohibitions on indecent broadcasts, on the ground that the FCC’s context-based approach to determining inde­ cency is unconstitutionally vague in its entirety. 2. Whether the court of appeals erred in invalidat­ ing a finding by the FCC that a broadcast including nu­ dity was indecent within the meaning of statutory and regulatory prohibitions on indecent broadcasts, on the ground that the FCC’s context-based approach to deter­ mining indecency is unconstitutionally vague in its en­ tirety. (I) PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Petitioners are the Federal Communications Com­ mission and the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    No. 08-0841-ag(L) Nos. 08-1424-ag (CON), 08-1781-ag (CON), 08-1966-ag (CON) IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ABC, INC., KTRK TELEVISION, INC., WLS TELEVISION, INC., CITADEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, WKRN, G.P., YOUNG BROADCASTING OF GREEN BAY, INC., WKOW TELEVISION INC., WSIL-TV, INC., ABC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOCIATION, CEDAR RAPIDS TELEVISION COMPANY, CENTEX TELEVISION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, CHANNEL 12 OF BEAUMONT INCORPORATED, DUHAMEL BROADCASTING ENTERPRISES, GRAY TELEVISION LICENSE, INCORPORATED, KATC COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, KATV LLC, KDNL LICENSEE LLC, KETV HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION INCORPORATED, KLTV/KTRE LICENSE SUBSIDIARY LLC, KSTP-TV LLC, KSWO TELEVISION COMPANY INCORPORATED, KTBS INCORPORATED, KTUL LLC, KVUE TELEVISION INCORPORATED, MCGRAW-HILL BROADCASTING COMPANY INCORPORATED, MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LLC, MISSION BROADCASTING INCORPORATED, MISSISSIPPI BROADCASTING PARTNERS, NEW YORK TIMES MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NEXSTAR BROADCASTING INCORPORATED, NPG OF TEXAS, L.P., OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION INC., PIEDMONT TELEVISION OF HUNTSVILLE LICENSE LLC, PIEDMONT TELEVISION OF SPRINGFIELD LICENSE LLC, POLLACK/BELZ COMMUNICATION COMPANY, INC., POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS SAN ANTONIO INC., SCRIPPS HOWARD BROADCASTING CO., SOUTHERN BROADCASTING INC., TENNESSEE BROADCASTING PARTNERS, TRIBUNE TELEVISION NEW ORLEANS INC., WAPT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION INC., WDIO-TV LLC, WEAR LICENSEE LLC, WFAA-TV INC., WISN HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION INC., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., NBC TELEMUNDO LICENSE CO., CBS BROADCASTING, INC., Intervenors, CENTER FOR CREATIVE VOICES IN MEDIA, FUTURE OF MUSIC COALITION, Amicus Curiae. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS ABC, INC.; KTRK TELEVISION, INC.; AND WLS TELEVISION, INC.
    [Show full text]