Broadcast Actions 11/21/2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Updated: 10/21/13 1 2008 Cable Copyright Claims OFFICIAL LIST No. Claimant's Name City State Date Rcv'd 1 Santa Fe Producti
2008 Cable Copyright Claims OFFICIAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of “(joint claim)” denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed. No. Claimant’s Name City State Date Rcv’d 1 Santa Fe Productions Albuquerque NM 7-1-09 2 (JOINT) American Lives II Film Project, LLC; American Lives film Project, Inc., American Documentaries, Inc., Florenteine Films, & Kenneth L.Burns Walpole NH 7-1-09 3 William D. Rogosin dba Donn Rogosin New York NY 7-1-09 Productions 4 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services St Paul MN 7-1-09 (Tavola Productions LLC) RMW Productions 5 Intermediary Copyright Royalty (Barbacoa, Miami FL 7-1-09 Inc.) 6 WGEM Quincy IL 7-1-09 7 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Little Rock AK 7-1-09 (Hortus, Ltd) 8 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services New York NY 7-1-09 (Travola Productions LLC), Frappe, Inc. 9 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services, Lakeside MO 7-1-09 Gary Spetz 10 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services, Riverside CT Silver Plume Productions 7-1-09 Updated: 10/21/13 1 11 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Des Moines IA 7-1-09 (August Home Publishing Company) 12 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Serv (Jose Washington DC 7-1-09 Andres Productions LLC) 13 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Serv (Tavola Productions LLC New York NY 7-1-09 14 Quartet International, Inc. Pearl River NY 7-1-09 15 (JOINT) Hammerman PLLC (Gray Atlanta GA 7-1-09 Television Group Inc); WVLT-TV Inc 16 (JOINT) Intermediary Copyright Royalty Washington DC 7-1-09 Services + Devotional Claimants 17 Big Feats Entertainment L.P. -
Brief for Respondents
No. 10-1293 In the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals at Yale FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. ABC, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS LEWIS BOLLARD JONATHAN SIEGEL Counsel for Respondents The Yale Law School 127 Wall Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 432–4992 QUESTIONS PRESENTED The FCC forbids the broadcasting of indecent speech, defined “as material that, in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory activities or organs in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium.” J.A. 49. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the FCC’s definition of indecency violates the Fifth Amendment because it is impermissibly vague. 2. Whether the FCC’s ban on indecency violates the First Amendment because it is not narrowly tailored and because it does not require scienter for liability. i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioners are the Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America. Respondents who were petitioners in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: Fox Television Stations, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc., WLS Television, Inc., KTRK Television, Inc., KMBC Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., and ABC Inc. Respondents who were intervenors in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: NBC Universal, Inc., NBC Telemundo License Co., NBC Television Affiliates, FBC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Network Affiliates, Center for the Creative Community, Inc., doing business as Center for Creative Voices in Media, Inc., and ABC Television Affiliates Association. -
2006 Cable Copyright Claims Final List
2006 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of A(joint claim)@ denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed. Otherwise, all joint copyright owners are listed. Date No Claimant=s Name City State Recvd. 1 Beth Brickell Little Rock Arkansas 7/1/07 2 Moreno/Lyons Productions LLC Arlington Massachusetts 7/2/07 3 Public Broadcasting Service (joint claim) Arlington Virginia 7/2/07 4 Western Instructional Television, Inc. Los Angeles California 7/2/07 5 Noe Corp. LLC Monroe Louisiana 7/2/07 6 MPI Media Productions International, Inc. New York New York 7/2/07 7 In Touch Ministries, Inc. Atlanta Georgia 7/2/07 8 WGEM Quincy Illinois 7/2/07 9 Fox Television Stations, Inc. (WRBW) Washington D.C. 7/2/07 10 Fox Television Stations, Inc. (WOFL) Washington D.C. 7/2/07 11 Fox Television Stations, Inc. (WOGX) Washington D.C. 7/2/07 12 Thomas Davenport dba Davenport Films Delaplane Virginia 7/2/07 13 dick clark productions, inc. Los Angeles California 7/2/07 NGHT, Inc. dba National Geographic 14 Television and Film Washington D.C. 7/2/07 15 Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc. New York New York 7/2/07 16 WSJV Television, Inc. Elkhart Indiana 7/2/07 17 John Hagee Ministries San Antonio Texas 7/2/07 18 Joseph J. Clemente New York New York 7/2/07 19 Bonneville International Corporation Salt Lake City Utah 7/2/07 20 Broadcast Music, Inc. -
NAB Comments Re: MMTC Ownership Study
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review - ) MB Docket No. 09-182 Review of the Commission’s Broadcast ) Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted ) Pursuant to Section 202 of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) MB Docket No. 07-294 Promoting Diversification of ) Ownership in the Broadcasting Services ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS The National Association of Broadcasters (“NAB”)1 submits these comments in response to the Media Bureau’s Public Notice2 seeking comment on a study commissioned by the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council (“MMTC”) entitled, “The Impact of Cross Media Ownership on Minority/Women Owned Broadcast Stations” (the “MMTC Study”).3 As discussed in detail below, this survey reconfirms the very substantial evidence in the record in this proceeding as to the challenges that all local broadcasters experience in today’s highly competitive media marketplace. NAB also again urges the Commission to adopt incentive-based approaches grounded in marketplace realities to promote a more diverse broadcast industry. 1 The National Association of Broadcasters is a nonprofit trade association that advocates on behalf of free local radio and television stations and broadcast networks before Congress, the Federal Communications Commission and other federal agencies, and the courts. 2 Media Bureau Invites Comments on Study Submitted by the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council in 2010 Quadrennial Review of Broadcast Ownership Rules, Public Notice, MB Docket Nos. 09-182, 07-294, DA 13-1317 (Jun. 7, 2013) (“Public Notice”). 3 Fratrik, Dr. Mark R., Vice President and Chief Economist, BIA/Kelsey, “The Impact of Cross Media Ownership on Minority/Women Owned Broadcast Stations” (May 30, 2013). -
2005 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST
2005 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of "(joint claim)" denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed. Otherivise, all joint copyright owners are listed. Date toto Claimant's Name City State Recvd. In Touch Ministries, Inc. Atlanta Georgia 7/1/06 Sante Fe Productions Albuquerque New Mexico 7/2/06 3 Gary Spetz/Gary Spetz Watercolors Lakeside Montana 7/2/06 The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts Washington D.C. 7/3/06 Hortus, Ltd. Little Rock Arkansas 7/3/06 6 Public Broadcasting Service (joint claim) Arlington Virginia 7/3/06 Western Instructional Television, Inc. Los Angeles Califoniia 7/3/06 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services (joint claim) (Devotional Television Broadcasts) Washington D.C. 7/3/06 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services (joint claim) (Syndicated Television Series) Washington D.C. 7/3/06 10 Berkow and Berkow Curriculum Development Chico California 7/3/06 11 Michigan Magazine Company Prescott Michigan 7/3/06 12 Fred Friendly Seminars, Inc. New York Ncw York 7/5/06 Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York dba Columbia University Seminars 13 on Media and Society New York New York 7/5/06 14 The American Lives II Film Project LLC Walpole Ncw Hampshire 7/5/06 15 Babe Winkelman Productions, Inc. Baxter Minnesota 7/5/06 16 Cookie Jar Entertainment Inc. Montreal, Quebec Canada 7/5/06 2005 Cable Copyright Claims FINAL LIST Note regarding joint claims: Notation of."(joint claim)" denotes that joint claim is filed on behalf of more than 10 joint copyright owners, and only the entity filing the claim is listed. -
2010 Satellite Claims
2010 SATELLITE CLAIMS NO. CLAIMANTS NAME CITY STATE DATE RCV’D 1 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Washington DC 7-1-11 (2010 Gray TV Satellite) Gray Television Group, Inc. 2 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Washington DC 7-1-11 (2010 MLS Satellite); Major League Soccer, LLC 3 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Washington DC 7-1-11 (2010 Little League Satellite); Little League Baseball Incorporated 4 The John F. Kennedy Center for the Washington DC 7-1-11 Performing Arts 5 (JOINT) Intermediary Copyright Royalty Washington DC 7-1-11 Services (2010 Joint Program Suppliers) 6 (JOINT) Intermediary Copyright Royalty Washington DC 7-1-11 Services (2010 Devotional Satellite 7 (JOINT) Broadcast Music, Inc. New York NY 7-1-11 8 Multimedia Holdings Corporation McLean VA 7-1-11 (KARE-TV) 9 Jonathan T. McCants, Esq.; Coral Ridge Atlanta GA 7-1-11 Ministries Media, Inc. 10 WSYX Licensee, Inc. Columbus OH 7-1-11 11 Columbus (WTTE-TV) Licensee, Inc. Columbus OH 7-1-11 12 Multimedia Holdings Corporation McLean VA 7-5-11 (KUSA-TV) 13 Multimedia Holdings Corporation; McLean VA 7-5-11 KTVD-TV 14 (JOINT) CBS Studios, A CBS Company; Santa Monica CA 7-5-11 Republic Distribution Corp.; Worldivision Enterprises, Inc.; Big Ticket Productions, Inc.; Spelling Television Inc.; Republic Entertainment, Inc; Republic Entertainment, Inc; Republic Pictures Enterprises; Big Ticket Pictures, Inc.; Big Ticket Television, Inc.; Showtime Networks, Inc. 15 (JOINT) Paramount Pictures Corporation; Los Angeles CA 7-5-11 Melange Pictures, LLC; DW Studios L.L.C; fka Dreamworks L.L.C. 16 Philip R. -
Joint Comments in the FCC's Indecency Proceedings
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) FCC Seeks Comment on Adopting ) GN Docket No. 13-86 Egregious Cases Policy ) ) To: The Commission JOINT REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NAMED STATE BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATIONS THE NAMED STATE BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATIONS Richard R. Zaragoza Paul A. Cicelski Counsel for the Named State Broadcasters Associations in this Matter Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 2300 N Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 202.663.8000 Dated: July 22, 2013 Table of Contents Page Introduction and Summary ............................................................................................................. 3 Discussion ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 15 i Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) FCC Seeks Comment on Adopting ) GN Docket No. 13-86 Egregious Cases Policy ) ) To: The Commission JOINT REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NAMED STATE BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATIONS Alabama Broadcasters Association, Alaska Broadcasters Association, Arizona Broadcasters Association, Arkansas Broadcasters Association, California Broadcasters Association, Colorado Broadcasters Association, Connecticut Broadcasters Association, Florida Association of Broadcasters, Georgia Association of Broadcasters, Hawaii Association -
February 23, 2011 Via ECFS Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal
A Professional Limited Liability Company Chicago Office 1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW, Fl 2 307 North Michigan Ave., Suite 1020 Washington, DC 20036 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: (202) 872-6811 Barbara S. Esbin Telephone: (312) 372-3930 Admitted in the District of Columbia Facsimile: (202) 683-6791 Facsimile: (312) 372-3939 February 23, 2011 Via ECFS Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Room TW-A325 Washington, DC 20554 Re: American Cable Association (“ACA”) Notice of Ex Parte Presentation; In the Matter of Rulemaking to Amend The Commission’s Rules Governing Retransmission Consent; MB Docket No. 10-71. Dear Ms. Dortch: On February 22, 2011, Ross Lieberman, American Cable Association; Thomas Cohen, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP; and the undersigned met with Joshua Cinelli, Media Advisor to Commissioner Copps; Jennifer Tatel, Legal Advisor-media issues to Commissioner Baker, Dave Grimaldi, Media Legal Advisor to Commissioner Clyburn; and Marilyn Sonn, Acting Legal Advisor for Media to Chairman Genachowski. During the meeting, ACA discussed the issues raised in its comments filed in support of the Petition for Rulemaking and as reflected in its ex parte letter filed February 16, 2011, including the matters of (i) retransmission consent price increases resulting from joint negotiations involving multiple “Big 4” (i.e., ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX) broadcast affiliates in a single market, and (ii) retransmission consent price discrimination against smaller multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”).1 ACA presented information derived from the analysis of its economic expert, Professor William P. Rogerson, Northwestern University, that was submitted with the ACA February 16th Ex Parte Letter and 1 In the Matter of Petition for Rulemaking to Amend the Commission’s Rules Governing Retransmission Consent, MB Docket No. -
Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-138 Before the Federal
Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-138 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Advanced Television Systems and ) MB Docket No. 87-268 their Impact Upon the Existing ) Television Broadcast Service ) ) SEVENTH REPORT AND ORDER AND EIGHTH FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING Adopted: August 1, 2007 Released: August 6, 2007 Comment Date: [30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] Reply Comment Date: [45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................6 A. The DTV Transition ............................................................................................................6 B. The Channel Election Process and Proposed New DTV Table of Allotments ...................7 C. Allotment Methodology and Evaluation of Interference Conflicts...................................16 III. SEVENTH REPORT AND ORDER ......................................................................................27 A. General Issues....................................................................................................................27 1. Request to add references to pending applications......................................................28 2. Request -
June 3, 2013 VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal
Ross J. Lieberman Vice President of Government Affairs American Cable Association 2415 39th Place, NW Washington, DC 20007 [email protected] (202) 494-5661 June 3, 2013 VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Ex Parte Communication of the American Cable Association; 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review -- Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, MB Docket No. 09-182; Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Related to Retransmission Consent, MB Docket No. 10-71. Dear Ms. Dortch: The American Cable Association (“ACA”) has previously brought to the Commission’s attention the widespread and increasing consolidation in the local television station marketplace, particularly the rising prevalence of separately owned, same market Big 4 network affiliates (e.g., ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC) coordinating their activities in ways that are harmful to competition and consumers. ACA submits this letter in the above referenced dockets now in light of the significant number of recent broadcast television mergers and acquisitions and sharing agreements, which present fresh evidence highlighting how broadcasters effectively ignore the Commission’s prohibition on duopoly ownership between top four-rated stations in the same market (usually Big 4 network affiliates), particularly through creative structuring of license transfers, followed by subsequent arrangements to coordinate activities. Taking into account deals that have closed in 2013, and those currently pending, within months there will likely be at least five new instances of top four-rated stations in a single market operating under a sharing arrangement, and the year is only half over. -
Subject: &Cableciaimsoloc.Gov& 833 N. Main Joint Claim for Cable
- I CableClaims Cable Joint Claim from New Vision Television Page 1 I CableClaims - Cable Joint Claim from New Vision Television Page 2 From: &[email protected]& Wichita, KS 67203 To: &cableciaimsoloc.gov& Date: Mon, Jul 28,2008 3:14 PM KSNW Subject: Cable Joint Claim from New Vision Television 833 N. Main Wichita, KS 67203 Joint Claim for Cable Retransmission Royalty Fees KSNC In accordance with section 111 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., and Subpart A of Part 360 of the Box 262 Copyright Royalty Board regulations, 37 CFR 360.1 through 360.5, the copyright owner claimants named Great Bend, KS 67530 herein file with the Copyright Royalty Board of the Library of Congress a claim to royalty payments collected from cable television systems retransmitting copyrighted programming contained on over-the-air KSNG television and radio broadcast signals. This joint claim to royalties is for fees collected from cable 204 Fulton Terrace television systems during calendar year 2007. Garden City, KS 6?846 Filer's full name: KSNK Box 238 New Vision Television Oberlin, KS 67749 Filer's full address: A general statement of the nature of the copyright owners'orks (e.g., motion pictures, syndicated television series, sports broadcasts, music, news, and other station-produced programming.): 833 N. Main Wichita, KS 67203 All station produced programming broadcast by KSNW, KSNC, KSNG and KSNK, and the station's entire broadcast day as a compilation. Telephone number of person or entity filing the claim: Example(s): Below, provide at least one example of a secondary retransmission of either a non-music 316-265-3333 {Example A} or music (Example B) work by filling in the blanks. -
Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73 Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Broadcast Service; Proposed Rule and Final Rule
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 Part II Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73 Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Broadcast Service; Proposed Rule and Final Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:58 Sep 25, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26SER2.SGM 26SER2 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2 54720 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 coordinates are specified on a station COMMISSION (TTY). license or construction permit, and the requested change did not result in a Summary of the Seventh Report and 47 CFR Part 73 change of more than three seconds Order [MB Docket No. 87–268; FCC 07–138] latitude or longitude for the station, we 1. In this Seventh Report and Order, are making the requested correction. Advanced Television Systems and the Commission adopts a new Table of Accepting corrections to Appendix B of Their Impact Upon the Existing Allotments for digital television three seconds or less is consistent with Television Broadcast Service (‘‘DTV’’) providing all eligible stations the Commission’s rules, which do not with channels for DTV operations after require a construction permit for such a AGENCY: Federal Communications the DTV transition on February 17, correction before it can be licensed. Commission. 2009. The new DTV Table is the result Three seconds of latitude or longitude is ACTION: Final rule. of informed decisions made by eligible approximately 200 to 300 feet. The licensees and permittees during the stations for which we make such a SUMMARY: The Commission adopts a Commission’s channel election process.