Metallographic Preparation of Nitrided and Nitrocarburised Components Application
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wear Behavior of Austempered and Quenched and Tempered Gray Cast Irons Under Similar Hardness
metals Article Wear Behavior of Austempered and Quenched and Tempered Gray Cast Irons under Similar Hardness 1,2 2 2 2, , Bingxu Wang , Xue Han , Gary C. Barber and Yuming Pan * y 1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China; [email protected] 2 Automotive Tribology Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA; [email protected] (X.H.); [email protected] (G.C.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Current address: 201 N. Squirrel Rd Apt 1204, Auburn Hills, MI 48326, USA. y Received: 14 November 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 8 December 2019 Abstract: In this research, an austempering heat treatment was applied on gray cast iron using various austempering temperatures ranging from 232 ◦C to 371 ◦C and holding times ranging from 1 min to 120 min. The microstructure and hardness were examined using optical microscopy and a Rockwell hardness tester. Rotational ball-on-disk sliding wear tests were carried out to investigate the wear behavior of austempered gray cast iron samples and to compare with conventional quenched and tempered gray cast iron samples under equivalent hardness. For the austempered samples, it was found that acicular ferrite and carbon saturated austenite were formed in the matrix. The ferritic platelets became coarse when increasing the austempering temperature or extending the holding time. Hardness decreased due to a decreasing amount of martensite in the matrix. In wear tests, austempered gray cast iron samples showed slightly higher wear resistance than quenched and tempered samples under similar hardness while using the austempering temperatures of 232 ◦C, 260 ◦C, 288 ◦C, and 316 ◦C and distinctly better wear resistance while using the austempering temperatures of 343 ◦C and 371 ◦C. -
Novel Triadius-Like N4 Specie of Iron Nitride Compounds Under High
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Novel triadius-like N4 specie of iron nitride compounds under high pressure Received: 11 May 2018 Yuanzheng Chen1, Xinyong Cai1, Hongyan Wang1, Hongbo Wang2 & Hui Wang2 Accepted: 2 July 2018 Various nitrogen species in nitrides are fascinating since they often appear with these nitride as Published: xx xx xxxx superconductors, hard materials, and high-energy density. As a typical complex, though iron nitride has been intensively studied, nitrogen species in the iron–nitrogen (Fe-N) compounds only have been confned to single atom (N) or molecule nitrogen (N2). Using a structure search method based on the CALYPSO methodology, unexpectedly, we here revealed two new stable high pressure (HP) states at 1:2 and 1:4 compositions with striking nitrogen species. The results show that the proposed FeN2 stabilizes by a break up of molecule N2 into a novel planar N4 unit (P63/mcm, >228 GPa) while FeN4 stabilizes by a infnite 1D linear nitrogen chains N∞ (P-1, >50 GPa; Cmmm, >250 GPa). In the intriguing N4 specie of P63/mcm-FeN2, we fnd that it possesses three equal N = N covalent bonds and forms a perfect triadius-like confguration being never reported before. This uniqueness gives rise to a set of remarkable properties for the crystal phase: it is identifed to have a good mechanical property and a potential for phonon-mediated superconductivity with a Tc of 4–8 K. This discovery puts the Fe-N system into a new class of desirable materials combining advanced mechanical properties and superconductivity. Nitrogen (N) is the most abundant element in the earth’s atmosphere and is one of the least studied elements regarding the composition of the Earth1. -
ITP Metal Casting: Advanced Melting Technologies
Advanced Melting Technologies: Energy Saving Concepts and Opportunities for the Metal Casting Industry November 2005 BCS, Incorporated 5550 Sterrett Place, Suite 306 Columbia, MD 21044 www.bcs-hq.com Advanced Melting Technologies: Energy Saving Concepts and Opportunities for the Metal Casting Industry Prepared for ITP Metal Casting by BCS, Incorporated November 2005 Acknowledgments This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers from University of Missouri–Rolla, Case Western Reserve University, and Carnegie Mellon University with BCS, Incorporated as the project coordinator and lead. The research findings for the nonferrous casting industry were contributed by Dr. Jack Wallace and Dr. David Schwam, while the ferrous melting technologies were addressed by Dr. Kent Peaslee and Dr. Richard Fruehan. BCS, Incorporated researched independently to provide an overview of the melting process and the U.S. metal casting industry. The final report was prepared by Robert D. Naranjo, Ji-Yea Kwon, Rajita Majumdar, and William T. Choate of BCS, Incorporated. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of the U.S. Department of Energy and Cast Metal Coalition (CMC) in conducting this study. Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an Agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any Agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any Agency thereof. -
Comparing and Contrasting Carbonitriding and Nitrocarburizing
This article was originally published in the July 2016 issue of Industrial Heating magazine and is republished here with permission The Heat Treat Doctor® COMPARING AND CONTRASTING CARBONITRIDING AND NITROCARBURIZING Daniel H. Herring THE HERRING GROUP Inc. 630-834-3017 [email protected] The terminology of heat treating is sometimes challenging. Heat treaters can be inconsistent at times, using one word when they really mean another. You have heard the terms carbonitriding and nitrocarburizing and know they are two different case-hardening processes, but what are the real differences between them? Let’s learn more. Part of our confusion stems from the fact that years ago carbonitriding was known by other names – “dry cyaniding,” “gas cyaniding,” “nicarbing” and (yes) “nitrocarburizing.” The Carbonitriding Process Carbonitriding is a modified carburizing process, not a form of nitriding. This modification consists of introducing ammonia into the carburizing atmosphere in order to add nitrogen into the carburized case as it is being produced (Fig. 1). Carbonitriding is typically done at a lower temperature than carburizing, from as low as 700-900°C (1300-1650°F), and for a shorter time than carburizing. Since nitrogen inhibits the diffusion of carbon, a combination of factors result in shallower case depths than is typical for carburized parts, typically between 0.075 mm (0.003 inch) and 0.75 mm (0.030 inch). It is important to note that a common contributor to non-uniform case depth during carbonitriding is to introduce ammo- nia additions before the load is stabilized at temperature (this is a common mistake in furnaces that begin gas additions upon setpoint recovery rather than introducing a time delay for the load to reach tempera- ture). -
Nanoscale Iron Nitride, Ε-Fe3n: Preparation from Liquid Ammonia
Nanoscale Iron Nitride, e-Fe3N: Preparation from Liquid Ammonia and Magnetic Properties Anne-Marie Zieschang,1 Joshua D. Bocarsly,2 Michael Dürrschnabel,3 Leopoldo Molina-Luna,3 Hans-Joachim Kleebe,3 Ram Seshadri,*2 Barbara Albert*1 1Technische Universität Darmstadt, Eduard-Zintl-Institute of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Alarich-Weiss-Str. 12, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany 2 University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Materials Department, and Materials Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106, U.S.A. 3Technische Universität Darmstadt, Department of Materials and Geosciences, Alarich-Weiss-Str. 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany ABSTRACT: e-Fe3N shows interesting magnetism but is difficult to obtain as a pure and single-phase sample. We report a new preparation method using the reduction of iron(II) bromide with elemental sodium in liquid ammonia at –78 °C, followed by annealing at 573 K. Nanostructured and monophasic oxygen-free iron nitride, e-Fe3N, is produced according to X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy experiments. The magnetic properties between 2 K and 625 K were characterized using a vibrating sample magnetometer, revealing soft ferromagnetic behavior with a low-temperature average 1 moment of 1.5 µB/Fe and a Curie temperature of 500 K. TC is lower than that of bulk e-Fe3N (575 K), which corresponds well with the small particle size within the agglomerates (15.4 (± 4.1) nm according to TEM, 15.8(1) according to XRD). Samples were analyzed before and after partial oxidation (Fe3N-FexOy core-shell nanoparticles with a 2–3 nm thick shell) by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, electron energy-loss spectroscopy and magnetic measurements. -
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0037529 A1 D'evelyn Et Al
US 20060037529A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0037529 A1 D'Evelyn et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb. 23, 2006 (54) SINGLE CRYSTAL AND QUASI-SINGLE Publication Classification CRYSTAL COMPOSITION, APPARATUS, AND ASSOCATED METHOD (51) Int. Cl. (75) Inventors: Mark Philip D’Evelyn, Niskayuna, NY C30B I5/00 (2006.01) (US); Dong-Sil Park, Niskayuna, NY C30B 30/04 (2006.01) (US); Victor Lienkong Lou, C30B 28/10 (2006.01) Niskayuna, NY (US); Thomas Francis C30B 27/02 (2006.01) McNulty, Ballston Lake, NY (US) C30B 21/06 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. .................................. 117/36; 117/13; 117/19 Correspondence Address: Shawn A. McClintic General Electric Global Research One Research Circle (57) ABSTRACT Docket Room K1-4A59 Niskayuna, NY 12309 (US) A Single crystal or quasi-single crystal including one or more (73) Assignee: General Electric Company, Group III material and an impurity. The impurity includes Schenectady, NY (US) one or more elements from Group IA, Group IIA, Groups IIIB to VIIB, Group VIII, Group IB, Group IIB, or Group (21) Appl. No.: 11/249,872 VIIA elements of the periodic table of elements. A compo (22) Filed: Oct. 13, 2005 Sition for forming a crystal is also provided. The composi tion includes a Source material comprising a Group III Related U.S. Application Data element, and a flux comprising one or more of P, Rb, Cs, Mg, Ca, Sr., Ba, Sc., Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/063,164, Mo, Pd, Ag, Hf, Ta, W, Pt, Au, Hg, Ge, or Sb, or the flux may filed on Mar. -
An Iron Nitride Complex** Carola Vogel, Frank W
Angewandte Chemie DOI: 10.1002/anie.200800600 Coordination Chemistry An Iron Nitride Complex** Carola Vogel, Frank W. Heinemann, Jörg Sutter, Christian Anthon, and Karsten Meyer* Coordination compounds of iron in high oxidation states have nitride complex stabilized by the sterically encumbering N- been invoked as reactive intermediates in biocatalyses. anchored tris(carbene) ligand, tris[2-(3-aryl-imidazol-2-ylide- Iron(IV) ferryl species are examples of such highly reactive ne)ethyl]amine (TIMENR,R= xylyl (xyl), mesityl (mes)).[11] species that have long been known to be at the catalytic Structurally and electronically related to the tetrahedral centers of oxygenases.[1] Supported by X-ray diffraction phosphinoborate ligand system by Peters and Betley,[7] this studies on nitrogenase, the iron nitride moiety has recently tripodal N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) system coordinates a been suggested to be present at the site of biological nitrogen high-spin FeII center in a trigonal-planar fashion, thus forming reduction.[2] As a result, well-characterized high-valent iron four-coordinate complexes with the metal ion in trigonal- complexes have been sought as biomimetic models for pyramidal environments. transformations mediated by iron-containing enzymes. Under inert atmosphere, treatment of TIMENR with To gain understanding of iron nitride reactivity and the one equivalent of anhydrous ferrous chloride in pyridine at possible role of such species in biocatalysis, insight into the room temperature yields the four-coordinate FeII complexes molecular structure of complexes stabilizing the [FeN] [(TIMENR)Fe(Cl)]Cl (1mes, 1xyl) as analytically pure, white synthon is highly desirable. Whereas significant progress has powders in 80% yield (Scheme 1). -
An Introduction to Nitriding
01_Nitriding.qxd 9/30/03 9:58 AM Page 1 © 2003 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Practical Nitriding and Ferritic Nitrocarburizing (#06950G) CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Nitriding THE NITRIDING PROCESS, first developed in the early 1900s, con- tinues to play an important role in many industrial applications. Along with the derivative nitrocarburizing process, nitriding often is used in the manufacture of aircraft, bearings, automotive components, textile machin- ery, and turbine generation systems. Though wrapped in a bit of “alchemi- cal mystery,” it remains the simplest of the case hardening techniques. The secret of the nitriding process is that it does not require a phase change from ferrite to austenite, nor does it require a further change from austenite to martensite. In other words, the steel remains in the ferrite phase (or cementite, depending on alloy composition) during the complete proce- dure. This means that the molecular structure of the ferrite (body-centered cubic, or bcc, lattice) does not change its configuration or grow into the face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice characteristic of austenite, as occurs in more conventional methods such as carburizing. Furthermore, because only free cooling takes place, rather than rapid cooling or quenching, no subsequent transformation from austenite to martensite occurs. Again, there is no molecular size change and, more importantly, no dimensional change, only slight growth due to the volumetric change of the steel sur- face caused by the nitrogen diffusion. What can (and does) produce distor- tion are the induced surface stresses being released by the heat of the process, causing movement in the form of twisting and bending. -
Case Depth Prediction of Nitrided Samples with Barkhausen Noise Measurement
metals Article Case Depth Prediction of Nitrided Samples with Barkhausen Noise Measurement Aki Sorsa 1,* , Suvi Santa-aho 2 , Christopher Aylott 3, Brian A. Shaw 3, Minnamari Vippola 2 and Kauko Leiviskä 1 1 Control Engineering, Environmental and Chemical Engineering research unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland; kauko.leiviska@oulu.fi 2 Materials Science and Environmental Engineering research unit, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland; suvi.santa-aho@tuni.fi (S.S.-a.); minnamari.vippola@tuni.fi (M.V.) 3 Design Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; [email protected] (C.A.); [email protected] (B.A.S.) * Correspondence: aki.sorsa@oulu.fi; Tel.: +358-294-482468 Received: 13 February 2019; Accepted: 10 March 2019; Published: 14 March 2019 Abstract: Nitriding is a heat treatment process that is commonly used to enhance the surface properties of ferrous components. Traditional quality control uses sacrificial pieces that are destructively evaluated. However, efficient production requires quality control where the case depths produced are non-destructively evaluated. In this study, four different low alloy steel materials were studied. Nitriding times for the samples were varied to produce varying case depths. Traditional Barkhausen noise and Barkhausen noise sweep measurements were carried out for non-destructive case depth evaluation. A prediction model between traditional Barkhausen noise measurements and diffusion layer hardness was identified. The diffusion layer hardness was predicted and sweep measurement data was used to predict case depths. Modelling was carried out for non-ground and ground samples with good results. Keywords: Barkhausen noise; magnetic methods; material characterization; nitriding; mathematical modelling; signal processing 1. -
Effect of Melting Process and Aluminium Content on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Fe–Al Alloys
ISIJ International, Vol. 50 (2010), No. 10, pp. 1483–1487 Effect of Melting Process and Aluminium Content on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Fe–Al Alloys Shivkumar KHAPLE, R. G. BALIGIDAD, M. SANKAR and V. V. Satya PRASAD Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad, 500058 India. E-mail: [email protected] (Received on January 4, 2010; accepted on July 1, 2010) This paper presents the effect of air induction melting with flux cover (AIMFC) versus vacuum induction melting (VIM) on the recovery of alloying element, reduction of impurities, workability and mechanical prop- erties of Fe–(7–16mass%)Al alloys. Three Fe–Al alloy ingots containing 7, 9 and 16 mass% Al were prepared by both AIMFC and VIM. All these ingots were hot-forged and hot-rolled at 1 373 K and were further charac- terized with respect to chemical composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. The recovery of aluminium as well as reduction of oxygen during both AIMFC and VIM is excellent. AIMFC ingots exhibit low level of sulphur and high concentration of hydrogen as compared to VIM ingots. VIM ingots of all the three alloys were successfully hot worked. However, AIMFC ingots of only those Fe–Al alloys containing lower concentration of aluminium could be hot worked. The tensile properties of hot-rolled Fe–7mass%Al alloy produced by AIMFC and VIM are comparable. The present study clearly demonstrates that it is feasible to produce sound ingots of low carbon Fe–7mass%Al alloy by AIMFC process with properties comparable to the alloy produced by VIM. KEY WORDS: air inducting melting with flux cover; vacuum induction melting; Fe–Al alloy; microstructure; mechanical properties. -
BAT Guide for Electric Arc Furnace Iron & Steel Installations
Eşleştirme Projesi TR 08 IB EN 03 IPPC – Entegre Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrol T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı BAT Guide for electric arc furnace iron & steel installations Project TR-2008-IB-EN-03 Mission no: 2.1.4.c.3 Prepared by: Jesús Ángel Ocio Hipólito Bilbao José Luis Gayo Nikolás García Cesar Seoánez Iron & Steel Producers Association Serhat Karadayı (Asil Çelik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.) Muzaffer Demir Mehmet Yayla Yavuz Yücekutlu Dinçer Karadavut Betül Keskin Çatal Zerrin Leblebici Ece Tok Şaziye Savaş Özlem Gülay Önder Gürpınar October 2012 1 Eşleştirme Projesi TR 08 IB EN 03 IPPC – Entegre Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrol T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı Contents 0 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................ 12 1 INTRODUCTION. ..................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS IN THE SECTOR OF STEEL PRODUCTION IN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE ................................................................................. 14 1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION OF THE SECTOR IN TURKEY ...................................................... 14 1.2.1 Current Situation ............................................................................................................ 14 1.2.2 Iron and Steel Production Processes............................................................................... 17 1.2.3 The Role Of Steel Sector in -
Gas Nitriding
GAS NITRIDING Technical Data Introduction of the nitriding factor, KN as the driving force for gas nitriding, provides for precise, continuous control. The traditional measurement of % dissociation provides an alternative parameter for checking the accuracy of the calculated KN and in many cases, as the primary control parameter. INTRODUCTION The metallurgical processes of carburizing and nitriding have followed similar paths as the technology has advanced, and in a process of continuous evolution both procedures have progressed through similar developmental stages. Carburizing, early on, was conducted by packing the work pieces in a thick layer of carbon powder and raising them to temperatures conducive to diffusion of carbon into the work. While the process was effective, it was excessively slow, and difficult to control, so it progressed into a process utilizing a carbonaceous gas atmosphere. The only effective way of controlling this process was to establish a relationship between the enriching gas flow, and measurement of the carbon potential, using either periodic shim stock or dew point measurements. This technique persisted until the early seventies when the zirconia carbon sensor was first introduced. This device provided continuous measurement of the carbon potential, rather than the discontinuous measurements from shim stock or dew point. The measurement has been subsequently refined, by adjusting the sensor calibration using 3-gas (CO, CO2 and CH4) IR analyzers to calculate a more accurate carbon potential. The technique is currently applied to carbon control using continuous non-dispersive infrared analyzers, which measure continuously rather than periodically. Nitriding has followed a similar path. The process provides several advantages for the alloys treated, such as high surface hardness, wear resistance, anti-galling, good fatigue life, corrosion resistance and improved sag resistance at temperatures up to the nitriding temperatures.