DOCSLIB.ORG

Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals Judith M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals Judith M Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Libraries Faculty and Staff choS larship and Research Purdue Libraries 1-1-2014 Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals Judith M. Nixon Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Nixon, Judith M., "Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals" (2014). Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research. Paper 61. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs/61 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals Judith M. Nixon In the library science field, there is no professionally accepted tiered list of journals in the United States to guide librarians, as there is in other academic disciplines. This situation creates a challenge for both new and experienced librarians who wish to make a serious contribution to librarianship by publishing articles. This article outlines a methodology used at the Libraries of Purdue University, which could be adapted by other university libraries, to create a tiered list of journals tailored to the institution. The article begins with a literature review that identifies a short list of top-level journals. This is followed by the methodology that uses expert opinion surveys, acceptance and circulation rates, impact factors, h-indexes, and journals with local faculty articles. Tables with the journals ranked into three tiers are included. Background and Reasons for major journals in the field.1 The advice ap- Compiling a Tiered List of LIS plies to all librarian-authors at all stages Journals of the career. Submitting to peer-reviewed In library and information science (LIS) journals is a well-recognized step; how- there is no professionally accepted ever, with over 250 refereed LIS journals, tiered or ranked list of journals in the identifying one is problematic. A tiered United States. This creates a dilemma for list of journals would provide guidance librarian-authors who wish to expand for both the faculty member preparing for the literature in librarianship, write promotion and the committees evaluating about successful programs, or report the portfolio. on research findings. Every librarian- At Purdue University, as at most uni- author faces the question of where to versities, promotion and tenure decisions submit the manuscript. The choice can go through three committees. The first have significant consequences on how committee’s membership is all associate many librarians will read it, how often and full professors in the library; the the article will be cited, and the impact second and third committees have some or influence it will have. This dilemma nonlibrarian full professor members. is especially critical for those in faculty A tiered list of journals would provide status positions seeking promotion and guidance for the second and third review tenure, as they are advised to have a committees, wherein most members are steady flow of refereed articles in the unfamiliar with the journal literature of Judith M. Nixon is Professor in the Humanities, Social Science and Education Library at Purdue University; e-mail: [email protected]. © 2014 Judith M. Nixon, Attribution-NonCommercial (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) CC BY-NC 66 crl12-387 Core Journals in Library and Information Science 67 the library science field. As a matter of that are not peer-reviewed, and 15 titles fact, the needs of the second and third in tier two was accepted by the Purdue promotion review committees provided University Library faculty and referred the initial impetus at Purdue Libraries to to the full professor subcommittee of the compile the list. Purdue Libraries Primary Promotion and A list of top-tiered journals would en- Tenure Committee. Sixty-seven titles in courage librarians to match articles to the tier one seemed like an overwhelming journals level. Beginning authors might number, especially since it included some avoid rejection from a top-tiered journal non–peer-reviewed titles. There were by submitting to a middle-level journals, serious questions about whether such a as these journals are less competitive and long list would be helpful to untenured often do not require research articles. faculty members. As one of the full pro- Editors of these journals frequently fessors, I accepted the challenge to see have the time to work more closely with if some method could be developed to authors to develop a publishable article. divide the list. Experienced librarian-authors writing full-fledged research articles could use Literature Review the list to identify top-level journals and In the literature on this topic, eight ar- different journals than where they have ticles stand out: an expert opinion study published in the past. As the writer be- by David Kohl and Charles Davis,3 two comes familiar with the style and scope replications,4 and five journal citation of specific journals and is encouraged studies. Three citations studies were done by past successes with submissions, it is in the 1990s: one by Mary Kim,5 a second normal and natural to favor these. How- by John M. Budd, 6 and third by Belen ever, in some cases these journals tend to Altuna Esteibar and F.W. Lancaster.7 Two be mid-level journals. A ranked or tiered additional citation studies were published list would encourage librarians to submit in 2007, bringing the research into the cur- to higher-ranked journals. rent decade: one by Kelly Blessinger and In Australia the professional associa- Michele Frasier8 and a second by Barbara tion has developed a tiered list.2 However, Via and Deborah Schmidle.9 A review of in the United States, no association has the findings of these articles and a merged been willing to take on the responsibility list of the top ten journals in each study of developing a methodology or compil- produced a list of top-tier journals. In ad- ing such a list. This motivated the library dition, the literature review identified the faculty at Purdue University Libraries to methods used that served as guidance for compile a tiered list of journals to be used the creation of the criteria. internally as a guide for our faculty mem- bers and promotion review committees. “Expert Opinion” or Perception Surveys This effort led to the idea of developing The David Kohl and Charles Davis arti- criteria to identify a list of tiered journals cle,10 “Ratings of Journals by ARL Library and to update it annually. The purpose of Directors and Deans of Library and Infor- this article is to share our methodology mation Science Schools,” has been heavily and the resulting tiered list of journals cited and replicated twice. This study with other librarians, especially those asked the deans of American Library with faculty status. Probably no two Association–accredited library schools university committees would agree on (referred to as “deans” throughout the the list, so the final list given here is not present article) and the directors of As- as important as the methodology, which sociation of Research Libraries (referred could be adapted for use elsewhere. to as “directors”) to rate 31 core journals A preliminary tiered list of journals on a scale of 1–5 (Likert scale). To do this with 67 titles in tier one, including a few study, Kohl and Davis had to provide a 68 College & Research Libraries January 2014 list of LIS journals. Their list constituted 9. Library Resources and Technical a revision of Jesse Shera’s “hard-core of Services library literature” published in his 1976 10. Library Trends book Introduction to Library Science.11 Kohl 11. RQ (title changed to Reference & and Davis found a hierarchy and agree- User Services Quarterly) ment between the deans’ and directors’ 12. Special Libraries rankings on two-thirds of the journals. Two replications followed the Kohl- When the top ten choices of both the Davis study during the following twenty directors and the deans were compared, years. In 1995, Virgil Blake13 replicated six titles appeared on both lists. In alpha- the 1985 study. When the top ten journals betical order, they are College & Research from the directors and the deans, 13 titles, Libraries, Information Technology and were compared to the top ten choices in Libraries, Journal of the American Society the 1985 study, 11 titles overlapped. The for Information Science (title changed to two new titles were The Chronicle of Higher Journal of the American Society for Infor- Education and Journal of Documentation. mation Science and Technology (JASIST)), Since the Chronicle is not a LIS journal, Library Quarterly, Library Resources and Blake only added one new title for consid- Technical Services, and Library Trends. The eration to the top journal list. (See table 1 directors added American Libraries, Journal for the rank of each title in the Blake study of Academic Librarianship, Library Journal and all other studies.) In 2005, the Kohl- and RQ (title changed to Reference & User Davis study was replicated again, this Services Quarterly). The deans included time by Thomas Nisonger and Charles Drexel Library Quarterly (now ceased), Davis. Combining the top ten choices of Journal of Education for Librarianship, the deans and directors produced a list Library and Information Science Research, of 14 titles. Four new titles appeared; and Special Libraries.12 A list of the top however, two of the new titles are not twelve titles selected by the directors truly journals and so were omitted from and deans constituted a working list of consideration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The World's Approach Toward Publishing in Springer And
    The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals Hajar Sotudeh and Zahra Ghasempour* Purpose: The present study explored tendencies of the world’s coun- tries—at individual and scientific development levels—toward publishing in APC-funded open access journals. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a bibliometric method, it studied OA and NOA articles issued in Springer and Elsevier’s APC journals‎ during 2007–2011. The data were gathered using a wide number of sources including Sherpa/Romeo, Springer Author-mapper, Science Direct, Google, and journals’ websites. Findings: The Netherlands, Norway, and Poland ranked highest in terms of their OA shares. This can be attributed to the financial resources al- located to publication in general, and publishing in OA journals in par- ticular, by the countries. All developed countries and a large number of scientifically lagging and developing nations were found to publish OA articles in the APC journals. The OA papers have been exponentially growing across all the countries’ scientific groups annually. Although the advanced nations published the lion’s share of the OA-APC papers and exhibited the highest growth, the underdeveloped groups have been displaying high OA growth rates. Practical Implications: Given the reliance of the APC model on authors’ affluence and motivation, its affordability and sustainability have been challenged. This communication helps understand how countries at differ- ent scientific development and thus wealth levels contribute to the model. Originality/Value: This is the first study conducted at macro level clarify- ing countries’ contribution to the APC model—at individual and scientific- development levels—as the ultimate result of the interaction between authors’ willingness, the model affordability, and publishers and funding agencies’ support.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing
    THE OPEN SCIENCE INITIATIVE WORKING GROUP Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing The Open Science Initiative (OSI) is a working group convened by the National Science Communi- cation Institute (nSCI) in October 2014 to discuss the issues regarding improving open access for the betterment of science and to recommend possible solutions. The following document summa- rizes the wide range of issues, perspectives and recommendations from this group’s online conver- sation during November and December 2014 and January 2015. The 112 participants who signed up to participate in this conversation were drawn mostly from the academic, research, and library communities. Most of these 112 were not active in this conversa- tion, but a healthy diversity of key perspectives was still represented. Individual participants may not agree with all of the viewpoints described herein, but participants agree that this document reflects the spirit and content of the conversation. This main body of this document was written by Glenn Hampson and edited by Joyce Ogburn and Laura Ada Emmett. Additional editorial input was provided by many members of the OSI working group. Kathleen Shearer is the author of Annex 5, with editing by Dominque Bambini and Richard Poynder. CC-BY 2015 National Science Communication Institute (nSCI) www.nationalscience.org [email protected] nSCI is a US-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization First edition, January 2015 Final version, April 2015 Recommended citation: Open Science Initiative Working Group, Mapping the Future of Scholarly
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research
    Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research © 2017 Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association. This work is issued under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license CC BY-NC 4.0. Citation: Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research. Prepared by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish of OCLC Research. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2017. Association of College & Research Libraries A division of the American Library Association Chicago, Illinois 2017 Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................vii Introduction: Demonstrate the Library’s Value ........................................................................................1 Communicate the Library’s Contributions ...........................................................................................................2 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 3 Match Library Assessment to Institution’s Mission ...............................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Palau
    REPUBLIC OF PALAU Palau Public Library Five-Year State Plan 2020-2022 For submission to the Institute of Museum and Library Services Submitted by: Palau Public Library Ministry of Education Republic of Palau 96940 April 22, 2019 Palau Five-Year Plan 1 2020-2022 MISSION The Palau Public Library is to serve as a gateway for lifelong learning and easy access to a wide range of information resources and to ensure the residents of Palau will be successful, literate and resourceful in the Palauan society and the world. PALAU PUBLIC LIBRARY BACKGROUND The Palau Public Library (PPL), was established in 1964, comes under the Ministry of Education. It is the only public library in the Republic of Palau, with collections totaling more than 20,000. The library has three full-time staff, the Librarian, the Library Assistant, and the Library Aide/Bookmobile Operator. The mission of the PPL is to serve as a gateway to lifelong learning and easy access to a wide range of information resources to ensure the residents of Palau will be successful, literate, and resourceful in the Palauan society and world. The PPL strives to provide access to materials, information resources, and services for community residents of all ages for professional and personal development, enjoyment, and educational needs. In addition, the library provides access to EBSCOHost databases and links to open access sources of scholarly information. It seeks to promote easy access to a wide range of resources and information and to create activities and programs for all residents of Palau. The PPL serves as the library for Palau High School, the only public high school in the Republic of Palau.
    [Show full text]
  • African American Research Library and Cultural Center Special Collections Preservation Project
    PG-266661-19 African American Research Library and Cultural Center Special Collections Preservation Project What activity (or activities) would the grant support? The African American Research Library and Cultural Center (AARLCC) is seeking support for the development of a two stage preservation and outreach initiative. The first output area will employ an external consultant to create a comprehensive preservation assessment report. The purpose of this assessment is to provide a thorough actionable report of archival planning needs. The scope of the assessment will cover the collections and their institutional context - the physical building, storage environment, security, access, care, conservation repair, and exhibition. Collections at AARLCC are found in the following mediums: paper, photographic, book, art, framed art, manuscript and oversized materials. Besides identifying a hierarchy of preservation needs, the report will serve as documentation for further institutional budgeting. The second output will be the completion of two preservation and collections care workshops for the general public. AARLCC is located in one of the oldest historically black communities in Broward County, Florida. Located on Sistrunk Blvd, named for one of Broward County’s first black physicians, AARLCC opened in 2002, and has served as the repository of materials related to the local, national and international voices of the African diaspora. With time, and as the surrounding neighborhoods undergo a change in population, the risk of losing valuable information is evident. The average person is unaware that their personal papers have historical value. Often, records of a community’s history are lost or discarded. Of great importance is the need to collect and preserve the history of this and other historically Black communities in Broward.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Library Association MLA '18 Poster Abstracts
    Medical Library Association MLA ’18 Poster Abstracts Abstracts for the poster sessions are reviewed by members of the Medical Library Association National Program Committee (NPC), and designated NPC members make the final selection of posters to be presented at the annual meeting. 1 Poster Number: 1 Time: Tuesday, May 22, 1:00 PM – 1:55 PM Bringing Each Other into the FOLD: Shared Experiences in Start-up Osteopathic Medical School Libraries Darell Schmick, AHIP, Director of Library Services, University of the Incarnate Word, School of Osteopathic Medicine Library, San Antonio, TX; Elizabeth Wright, Director of Library Services, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education, Library, Fort Smith, AR; Erin Palazzolo, Library Director and Professor of Medical Informatics, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine at New Mexico State University, BCOM Library, Las Cruces, NM; Norice Lee, Assoc. Library Director & Assoc. Prof. / Medical Informatics, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine Health Sciences Library, Las Cruces, NM; Molly Montgomery, Director of Library Services, Proposed Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Library, Meridian, ID; Anna Yang, AHIP, Health Sciences Librarian, California Health Sciences University, Library, Clovis, CA Objectives: To establish a communication channel for founding library administrators of new medical schools. Methods: Library directors in founding osteopathic medical schools are faced with a unique set of challenges in this role. Depending on the establishing medical school’s structure, these can be librarians in a solo capacity. Librarians in this role share experiences and best practices over a monthly meeting for their inaugural and second academic school years, respectively. Results: Meetings enjoyed robust discussion and comparison of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Library Operations (2019-2020) FINAL REPORT
    FHWA-NJ-2021-002 Research Library Operations (2019-2020) FINAL REPORT January 2021 Submitted by Teri Taylor Supervising Librarian New Jersey State Library An affiliate of Thomas Edison State University NJDOT Research Project Manager Pragna Shah In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NOTICE The United States government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the New Jersey State Library, or Thomas Edison State University. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NJ-2021-002 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date FINAL REPORT December 2020 Research Library Operations (2019-2020) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Teri Taylor, NJ State Library 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. New Jersey State Library An affiliate of Thomas Edison State University PO Box 520 11. Contract or Grant No. 18-60148 Trenton, NJ 08625-0520 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration (SPR) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006285 Final Report, July 2019 – December 2020 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 New Jersey Department of Transportation (SPR) 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Scientific Research in Online Information Review. Part 1
    Trends in scientific research in Online Information Review. Part 1. Production, impact and research collaboration Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent12*; Carolina Navarro-Molina2; Remedios Aguilar-Moya3; David Melero-Fuentes4; Juan-Carlos Valderrama-Zurián2 1. Instituto de Gestión de la Información y del Conocimiento (INGENIO) (CSIC-UPV), Spain. 2. Unidad de Información e Investigación Social y Sanitaria (CSIC-UV), Spain. 3. Departamento de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Católica de Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, Spain. 4. Instituto de Documentación y Tecnologías de la Información, Universidad Católica de Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, Spain. *Correspondence: [email protected] Plaza Cisneros, 4 46003-Valencia, Spain Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Online Information Review journal, Authorship patterns, Collaborative research, Highly cited papers, Social Network Analyses. Abstract The study, based on the Web of Science, analyses 758 articles published from 2000 to 2014. Our analysis includes the publications’ output, authorship, institutional and country patterns of production, citations and collaboration. A Social Network Analysis was conducted to identify primary groups of researchers and institutions and the collaboration between countries. 1 The study reveals that 1097 authors and 453 Institutions have contributed to the journal. The collaboration index has increased progressively, and the average degree of collaboration during the study period was 1.98. The majority of the papers were contributed by professionals affiliated with a university. Highly cited papers address online and digital environments, e-learning systems, mobile services, web 2.0 and citation analyses. This work is a bibliometric analysis of a leading journal in library and information science, Online Information Review. 1. Background Online Information Review is an international journal devoted to research in the field of online information in academic, government, corporate, scientific and commercial contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrics for Special Libraries Explore the IMF Elibrary
    SEP OCT information 12 V 16 | N 05 outlook THE MAGAZINE OF THE SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION METRICS FOR SPECIAL LIBRARIES Explore the IMF eLibrary See our recommended reading list at www.elibrary.imf.org/ioso www.elibrary.imf.org INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND SEP OCT information 12 V 16 | N 05 outlook THE MAGAZINE OF THE SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION INFO VIEW SLA 2012 CONTRIBUTED PAPER 3 Measuring for Success 24 Don’t Touch that BRENT MAI String! There Went the Databases INSIDE INFO DEE BALDWIN, 4 Nominations Sought MicHAEL KUcsak, for Board Positions · AND ALICE ENG SLA to Cease Printing Magazine in 2013 · COMPETENCIES FOR LIBRARIANS Annual Conference 33 Do Librarians Draws 3,500 to Chicago Need PhDs? DEANNA B. MARCUM INFO NEWS 6 Teaching, Communicating MARKET SHARE 8 METRICS FOR are Key to Proving Value · 36 Marketing through Cost, Technology Enchantment: SPECIAL LIBRARIES Spurring Rise in Group The Guy Kawasaki Research · Major U.S. Approach News Sites Losing JILL STRAND # Title here Credibility · Graduates 10 WhatAUT AreHOR We Measuring, Want Continued Access INFO TECH and Does It Matter? to Research 39 Collaboration in Special 16ST ETitleVE HILL hereER Library Environments SLA MEMBER INTERVIEW STEPHEN ABRAM AUTHOR 20 10 Questions: 13 Benchmarking: Dee Baldwin INFO BUSINESS A Powerful STUART HALES 42 Metrics and Value Management Tool DEBBIE SCHACHTERS MARTHA HASWELL 44 Industry Events Webinars 16 Beyond Metrics: Ad Index The Value of the Information Center CONSTANCE ARD INFO VIEW Measuring for Success Another of the board’s strategic agen- Two SLA task forces are taking action da items is to grow SLA by diversifying to establish benchmarks for professional our membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing the Information Edge
    SPECIAL LIBRARIES: INCREASING THE INFORMATION EDGE Jose-Marie Griffiths, Ph.D. University of Tennessee Donald W. King King Research SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION 1700 Eighteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009 Librarv of Congress Cataloglng-in-Publication Data Griffiths, Jose-Marie. Special libraries : increasing the information edge / Jose-Marie Griffiths, Donald W. King, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p.) and index. ISBN 0-87111-414-3 1. Corporate libraries—United States. 2. Libraries, Governmental, administrative, etc.—United States. 3. Libraries and industry—United States. I. King. Donald Ward. 1932- II. Title. Z675.C778G75 1993 027.6'9'0973—dc20 93-20721 CIP Published by the Special Libraries Association. ® Copyright 1993 by the Special Libraries Association. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this work, in whole or in part, without permission of the publisher is prohibited. ISBN 0-87111-414-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLES vii FIGURES xi FOREWORD xiii PART I: BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY 1 CHAPTER 1: INFORMATION EDGE IN THE INFORMATION AGE 5 INTRODUCTION ' 5 THE INFORMATION AGE 6 THE INFORMATION EDGE 8 The Information Edge Among Countries 9 The Information Edge Among Companies 11 The Information Edge Among Professionals 12 Purposes of Reading 14 Importance of Information Found in Documents 14 Savings Achieved from Reading 15 Effects of Reading on Performance of Work 15 Achievement and Amount of Reading . 17 Do Some Professionals Read Too Much? 18 CHAPTER 2: INCREASING THE INFORMATION EDGE: THE ROLE OF SPECIAL LIBRARIES 21 THE INCREASING ROLE OF LIBRARIES 21 USE AND IMPACT OF LIBRARY SERVICES 23 Use and Cost of Library Services 23 What Professionals Are Willing to Pay for Library Services 25 The Dollar Value Derived from Library Services 25 IMPACT OF LIBRARIES ON ORGANIZATION GOALS 28 Increasing Productivity Through Library Services 29 Performing Work Better and with Greater Quality Through Library Services ...
    [Show full text]
  • Library Outreach Programs in Rural Areas
    Library Outreach Programs in Rural Areas JUDITH I. BOYCEAND BERTR. BOYCE ABSTRACT OUTREACHIS THE ONLY MEANS by which library services can be effectively distributed over rural areas where the population necessary to provide the public financing of quality information service is so dispersed that a single location facility will not be accessible to large portions of the popu- lation contributing to the service. Rural areas are served by national in- formation agencies, state information agencies, the libraries of colleges and universities, and by local public libraries-all using outreach meth- ods. Particular efforts have been made to support distance learning ac- tivities and health information needs, and it is in these areas that new technology has been most prevalent. Video and electronic digital media are beginning to have some ef- fect on rural outreach activities, but most service is still provided by small local libraries or branches, by bookmobiles, by depository collections, and by books-by-mail programs. The immediate effect of the new tech- nologies seems to be to support these programs rather than supplant them. THEPROBLEM Library use of outreach programs in rural areas is the focus of this article. The libraries involved are primarily facilities attempting to serve a population so dispersed and distributed as to make major use of a cen- tral facility unlikely and difficult for a portion of the people served. It is important to understand that if by rural library service we mean services Judith I. Boyce, Youth Services, West Baton Rouge Parish Library, 830 Alexander Avenue, Port Allen, LA 70767 Bert R.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Articles Found in School Library Media Research and the ERIC Database Best of ERIC
    Volume 9, 2006 ISSN: 1523-4320 www.ala.org/aasl/slr School Library Media Research: An Analysis of Articles Found in School Library Media Research and the ERIC Database Best of ERIC Kelly Wirkus, Social Studies Teacher, Mosinee High School, Wisconsin The purpose of this paper is to study the research that has been completed on school library media centers in recent years. This paper attempts to build upon similar studies that were published in 1993 by Grover and Fowler and in 2003 by Clyde. Studying the research published in School Library Media Research (1998-2004) and the ERIC database (1992-2003) will summarize for the professional community information on many aspects of school library research. This study contributes to the professional literature by determining what types of research methods have been most prevalent in school library research articles, what topics have been addressed by the research, what grade levels have been the focus of the research, and how recent research studies compare to prior studies of school library media research conducted by Grover and Fowler (1993) and Clyde (2003). This paper was written to fulfill the requirements to receive the MLIS degree from the University of Southern Mississippi. The paper was submitted to and evaluated by USM SLIS faculty in December 2005. Introduction Research is a vital component to almost every profession today, and research in the field of library and information science is no exception. The lack of research completed by current library practitioners is a recognized concern in the library and information science (LIS) field. Practicing librarians often do not see themselves as members of the research community, and academic researchers have a tendency to believe that the research completed by LIS practitioners is not as significant as their own (McNicol 2004).
    [Show full text]