Paulger DISSERTATION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paulger DISSERTATION Anglo-American Quality Press Narratives and Discourses of Sexual Revolution, 1958-1979 By Ross K. Paulger Registration No: 110221391 Supervisor: Dr Adrian Bingham Word Count: 66090 A dissertation submitted in part-fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in History University of Sheffield March 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 Revolution as Concept ......................................................................... 2 Sexual Revolution(s) ........................................................................... 5 The Choice of Newspapers ................................................................ 16 Methodological Approaches .............................................................. 21 Types of Sources to be Analysed ...................................................... 28 Chapter Structure ............................................................................... 32 Chapter 1: FEMINISM AND WOMEN’S LIBERATION ......................... 35 Literature Review Concepts of Feminism(s) ........................................................ 35 History of Feminism(s) ........................................................... 39 Historiography of Feminism and Media ................................. 45 The Second Wave and Sexual Revolution .............................. 51 Primary Source Analysis .................................................................... 62 Analysis of British Primary Sources Britain – 1960 ................................................................. 62 Britain – 1966 ................................................................. 64 Britain – 1967 ................................................................. 67 Britain – 1968 ................................................................. 72 Britain – 1970 ................................................................. 75 Britain – 1975 ................................................................. 83 Britain – 1976 ................................................................. 91 Britain – 1979 ................................................................. 94 Summary of British Coverage of Feminism ............................ 97 Analysis of United States Primary Sources .............................. 98 United States – 1960 ...................................................... 98 United States – 1962 .................................................... 102 United States – 1966 .................................................... 109 United States – 1967 .................................................... 113 United States – 1968 .................................................... 115 United States – 1970 .................................................... 121 United States – 1975 .................................................... 128 Summary of United States Coverage of Feminism ................ 134 Chapter Conclusions ......................................................................... 136 Chapter 2: OBSCENITY PORNOGRAPHY, AND PERMISSIVENESS .... 142 Literature Review The Birth of the Permissive Society ........................................... 142 Permissiveness, the Permissive Society, and Obscenity ............ 146 Conceptualising Pornography .................................................... 150 Primary Source Analysis ...................................................................... 154 United States – 1960 .................................................................. 154 Great Britain – 1960 ................................................................... 163 United States – 1964 .................................................................. 174 Great Britain – 1964 ................................................................... 179 Great Britain – 1967 ................................................................... 181 United States – 1970 .................................................................. 185 Great Britain – 1971 ................................................................... 190 United States – 1971 .................................................................. 202 Chapter Conclusion .............................................................................. 205 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................... 208 Bibliography ................................................................................................... 218 Appendix I Appendix II INTRODUCTION The 'sexual revolution' is something of a mystery in modern Western culture. It is often referenced as something that transformed our society's understanding of sexual norms and mores. Any contemporary challenge to existing views on sexual practices or social mores references ‘sexual revolution’, either referring to the ‘Swinging 60s’ or calling for another ‘sexual revolution’. Any change in how people conceptualise sexual norms and mores in the present is ultimately defined by this event.1 The enduring knowledge and popular memory that a ‘sexual revolution’ occurred in the 1960s or 1970s is at odds with the ability of many people to articulate exactly what this sexual revolution was beyond a feeling or vague reference to a broad historical period. How then were we able to arrive at the conclusion that there was a 'sexual revolution'? The answer is undoubtedly complex, but certainly mass media played a role. This dissertation looks at quality newspapers in the United States and Great Britain to explore this question more fully. In addition, this dissertation seeks to answer the following questions: What were the limits to the discussion of themes related to sexual revolution in the quality press during this period? What constituted the limits of acceptability, which the quality press would not exceed regarding discussing sexual norms and mores? What does this tell us about the quality press during this period? How was the discussion presented over the period (i.e. positively, negatively, constructively), as well as in what format? Where applicable, how did the quality press present public response to these issues? What do these contribute to the widely-held understandings about sexual revolution? 1 A simple internet search reveals any number of results referencing a post-sexual revolution society, see Jen Doll, Harvard Sex Week and the Next Wave of the Sexual Revolution, The Atlantic Wire, 2012.[cited February 25, 2013] http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/04/harvard-sex-week-and-next-wave-sexual- revolution/51232/. 1 The sexual revolution was a transatlantic phenomenon and it cannot be said that it occurred in one country and was then exported verbatim to the other. This dissertation intends to examine the cross-cultural flow of the period as played out in the pages of quality newspapers, particularly because of the special relationship between the United States and Great Britain, where a comparative approach has been neglected. The broad content-based analysis and discourse analysis employed in the pursuit of its findings has been lacking in previous studies due to the lack of digital archives and the tools available therein to make this sort of analysis possible. Revolution as Concept Before making any sort of review of historiography on a ‘sexual revolution’ it is important to discuss the idea of revolution itself and its place within a framework applicable to a society. Though Hannah Arendt’s work on the concept of revolution was inherently class- based and ultimately political, when coupled with an understanding that personal interactions are inherently political themselves, it becomes a primer for studying the underlying forces and concepts at work in a society. Such an examination provides a framework with which to examine an idea of a ‘sexual’ revolution, as opposed to an insurrection or mere evolution. First and foremost is the concept of revolution as a dialectic of freedom and liberation. Often the two words, indeed the two concepts, are interchangeably employed; this is a mistake. From an Aristotelian viewpoint, liberation is an absence of restraint where freedom is the political condition in which the acceptability of the state of liberation is decided upon by a group. As Hannah Arendt observed, ‘…revolution as we know it in the modern age has always been concerned with both liberation and freedom… it is frequently very difficult to say where the mere desire for liberation, to be free from oppression ends, and the desire for freedom as 2 the political way of life begins.'2 Therefore a revolution is not necessarily a reassertion of lost liberties (as in ancient, medieval, or early modern periods), but rather can be a consequence (in the modern age) of a discussion or deliberation as to the limits of the restraint of oppression expressed through some sort of conflict. Carrying this idea forward to examine the social ramifications of revolution, Theda Skocpol argued persuasively that, 'What is unique to social revolution is that basic changes in social structure and in political structure occur together in a mutually reinforcing fashion.'3 Further, 'Successful revolutions, in turn, depend not only upon the emergence of multiple sovereignty. They also probably depend upon "the formation of coalitions between members of the polity and the contenders advancing exclusive alternative claims to control over the government."'4 Skocpol argued that this was the case in France,
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 Freedom and Progress
    Chapter 4 Freedom and Progress The best road to progress is freedom’s road. John F. Kennedy The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impeded their efforts to obtain it. John Stuart Mill To cull the inestimable benefits assured by freedom of the press, it is necessary to put up with the inevitable evils springing therefrom. Alexis de Tocqueville Freedom is necessary to generate progress; people also value freedom as an important component of progress. This chapter will contend that both propositions are correct. Without liberty, there will be little or no progress; most people will consider an expansion in freedom as progress. Neither proposition would win universal acceptance. Some would argue that a totalitarian state can marshal the resources to generate economic growth. Many will contend that too much liberty induces libertine behavior and is destructive of society, peace, and the family. For better or worse, the record shows that freedom has increased throughout the world over the last few centuries and especially over the last few decades. There are of course many examples of non-free, totalitarian, ruthless government on the globe, but their number has decreased and now represents a smaller proportion of the world’s population. Perhaps this growth of freedom is partially responsible for the breakdown of the family and the rise in crime, described in the previous chapter. Dictators do tolerate less crime and are often very repressive of deviant sexual behavior, but, as the previous chapter reported, divorce and illegitimacy are more connected with improved income of women than with a permissive society.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Histories in Health Research ~
    Personal Histories in Health Research ~ Edited by Adam Oliver ISBN: 1 905030 11 8 Personal Histories in Health collection © The Nuffield Trust 2005 ‘Ploughing a furrow in ethics’ © Raanan Gillon and The Nuffield Trust 2005 Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street London WC1 7LP telephone 020 7631 8450 fax 020 7613 8451 email: [email protected] website: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk charity number 209201 designed and printed by Q3 Digital Litho telephone 01509 213 456 website: www.Q3group.co.uk Contents 1 Healthy Lives: reflecting on the reflections Adam Oliver 3 2 Health inequalities: from science to policy David Blane 15 3 In sickness and in health: working in medical sociology Mike Bury 29 4 Random assignments: my route into health policy: a post-hoc rationalisation Anna Coote 47 5 Last Season’s fruit John Grimley Evans 65 6 Ploughing a furrow in ethics Raanan Gillon 85 7 The Jungle: an explorer’s experiences of health services research Walter W Holland 101 8 Confessions of a graduate nurse Alison Kitson 121 9 Confessions of an accidental policy analyst, or why I am not a health service researcher Rudolf Klein 139 10 Seeking somewhere to stop Jennie Popay 155 11 Political ideals and personal encounters Albert Weale 173 12 Discovering the QALY, or how Rachel Rosser changed my life Alan Williams 191 13 Health policy, management and gardening Robert Maxwell 207 About the authors About the authors vii David Blane is Professor of Medical Sociology at Imperial College London. He trained in medicine and sociology, and enjoys teaching medical sociology as an applied subject to large classes of trainee doctors, and as an academic discipline to smaller numbers of interested medical students.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Histories of the Second Wave of Feminism
    Personal Histories of the Second Wave of Feminism summarised from interviews by Viv Honeybourne and Ilona Singer Volumes One and Two 1 Feminist Archive Oral History Project Foreword by the Oral History Project Workers Ilona Singer and Viv Honeybourne The Oral History Project has been a fantastic opportunity to explore feminist activism from the 1970's onwards from the unique perspectives of women who were involved. We each conducted ten in depth qualitative interviews which were recorded (the minidisks will be kept at the archive as vital pieces of history themselves) and written up as an oral history. We used the open-ended questions (listed as an appendix), so as to let the women speak for themselves and not to pre-suppose any particular type of answer. We tried to involve our interviewees as much as possible in every stage of the research process. Many interviewees chose to review and amend the final write-ups and we were happy to let them do this so that they could have control over how they wished to be represented. The use of a snowball sampling method and the fact that our interviewees were willing volunteers means that these histories (herstories) are not meant to be representative in a strictly scientific sense. Some women were more publicly active in the period than others, but all our of interviewees had important stories to tell and vital reflections on the period. The oral histories have been included in alphabetical order. They are of differing lengths because some women spoke for longer than others and we felt that to strive excessively to limit their words would be imposing an artificial limit on their account of their own lives .
    [Show full text]
  • King Mob Echo: from Gordon Riots to Situationists & Sex Pistols
    KING MOB ECHO FROM 1780 GORDON RIOTS TO SITUATIONISTS SEX PISTOLS AND BEYOND BY TOM VAGUE INCOMPLETE WORKS OF KING MOB WITH ILLUSTRATIONS IN TWO VOLUMES DARK STAR LONDON ·- - � --- Printed by Polestar AUP Aberdeen Limited, Rareness Rd., Altens Industrial Estate, Aberdeen AB12 3LE § 11JJJDJJDILIEJMIIENf1r 1f(Q) KIINCGr JMI(Q)IB3 JECCIHI(Q) ENGLISH SECTION OF THE SITUATIONIST INTERNATIONAL IF([J)IF ffiIE V ([J) IL lUilII ([J) W §IFIEIEIIJ) IHIII§il([J) ffiY ADDITIONAL RESEARCH BY DEREK HARRIS AND MALCOLM HOPKINS Illustrations: 'The Riots in Moorfields' (cover), 'The London Riots', 'at Langdale's' by 'Phiz' Hablot K. Browne, Horwood's 1792-9 'Plan of London', 'The Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle', 'Oliver Twist Manifesto' by Malcolm McLaren. Vagrants and historical shout outs: Sandra Belgrave, Stewart Home, Mark Jackson, Mark Saunders, Joe D. Stevens at NDTC, Boz & Phiz, J. Paul de Castro, Blue Bredren, Cockney Visionaries, Dempsey, Boss Goodman, Lord George Gordon, Chris Gray, Jonathon Green, Jefferson Hack, Christopher Hibbert, Hoppy, Ian Gilmour, Ish, Dzifa & Simone at The Grape, Barry Jennings, Joe Jones, Shaun Kerr, Layla, Lucas, Malcolm McLaren, John Mead, Simon Morrissey, Don Nicholson-Smith, Michel Prigent (pre-publicity), Charlie Radcliffe, Jamie Reid, George Robertson & Melinda Mash, Dragan Rad, George Rude, Naveen Saleh, Jon Savage, Valerie Solanas, Carolyn Starren & co at Kensington Library, Mark Stewart, Toko, Alex Trocchi, Fred & Judy Vermorel, Warren, Dr. Watson, Viv Westwood, Jack Wilkes, Dave & Stuart Wise Soundtrack: 'It's a London Thing' Scott Garcia, 'Going Mobile' The Who, 'Living for the City' Stevie Wonder, 'Boston Tea Party' Alex Harvey, 'Catholic Day' Adam and the Ants, 'Do the Strand' Roxy Music', 'Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Liberation and Feminist Discourse in 1960S Playboy and Cosmopolitan
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Sexually Explicit, Socially Empowered: Sexual Liberation and Feminist Discourse in 1960s Playboy and Cosmopolitan Lina Salete Chaves University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Chaves, Lina Salete, "Sexually Explicit, Socially Empowered: Sexual Liberation and Feminist Discourse in 1960s Playboy and Cosmopolitan" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3041 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sexually Explicit, Socially Empowered: Sexual Liberation and Feminist Discourse in 1960s Playboy and Cosmopolitan by Lina Salete Chaves A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Humanities and Cultural Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Daniel M. Belgrad Ph.D. Robert E. Snyder Ph.D. Laurel Graham Ph.D. Date of Approval: September 22, 2011 Keywords: individualism, consumerism, careerism, sexuality, feminism Copyright © 2011, Lina Salete Chaves Table
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Fall 2011 Table of Contents Contents Announcing the Masters & Johnson Collection Kinsey library receives the archives of these pioneers in sex research. Mapplethorpe Foundation Donates Photographs 30 photographs by this influential 20-century artist donated to the Kinsey Collections. Researchers Present at Fall Conferences Kinsey Institute scientists and graduate students share their research. New Thought Leaders Join Kinsey Board Industry leaders contribute their expertise. Announcing the 2012 John Money Fellowship for Scholars of Sexology Graduate Student fellowship utilizes Kinsey Institute library and archives. Applications close December 22, 2011. In Memory: Don McMasters We honor the life of art enthusiast and Kinsey donor Don McMasters. Fall Events at The Kinsey Institute Filmmaker Monika Treut curates Kinsey films and Len Prince show opens. Hold the date! May 17-20, 2012, Eastern/Midcontinent Regions Meeting of SSSS at Indiana University. Hope to see you here. The mission of The Kinsey Institute is to promote interdisciplinary research and scholarship in the fields of human sexuality, gender, and reproduction. The Institute was founded in 1947 by renowned sex researcher Alfred Kinsey. Today, the Institute has two components, an Indiana University research institute and a not-for-profit corporation, which owns and manages the Institute's research data and archives, collections, and databases. The Masters & Johnson Collection The Kinsey Institute is pleased to announce the new “Masters and Johnson” collection at The Kinsey Institute library. The collection documents the work of William Masters and Virginia Johnson, who from 1957 to the 1980s transformed our understanding of sexual response and sex therapy. The collection, donated by Virginia Johnson and her family, includes letters, records, correspondence, research papers, media coverage, books, paintings, awards and certificates.
    [Show full text]
  • 1– 137– 32145– 9 Copyrighted Material – 978– 1– 137– 32145– 9
    Copyrighted material – 978– 1– 137– 32145– 9 Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Gert Hekma and Alain Giami 2014 Remaining chapters © Respective authors 2014 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6– 10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2014 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978– 1– 137– 32145– 9 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics and Dialectics of Capitalism*
    The Journol of Llbrrtarion Sludier. Vol. V, No. Z(Spring 1981) The Dynamics and Dialectics of Capitalism* by Robert G. Perrin Deportment of Sociology, University of Tennessee Free societies (whatever the fine points in defining "free") are not necessar- ily self-perpetuating. An understanding of this has underlain many of the attempts-past andpresent - to clarify the nature of a capitalist economy - both its dynamics in furthering what has been called the free or even "per- missive" society' and its dialectics in apparently creating a social milieu in- hospitable to its continued existence. The role of competitive capitalism (or a market-based private enterprise system) in supporting and extending per- sonal liberty ("freedom to" as well as "freedom from") is little known among the lay public compared to, say, the intended roles of public educa- tion, constitutional government, or a free press. Indeed, the workings of capitalism are usually more subtle, and its effects on the range of human choice have generally been unintended by those bringing them about. That is, they often occur as by-products of actions motivated by quite other ends- in-view (e.g., making a profit). I As a general rule, the range of human choice is expanded when consumers (and not governments) are sovereign in the marketplace. New products and services, indeed, innovations of all kinds, cater to consumer demands, while new demands may be cultivated by the creation of products and services that are expected to meet with consumers' desires and tastes. Less conspicu- ously, competitive capitalism erodes constraints of tradition and convention to the extent the "cash nexus" becomes dominant in social interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introducing LGBTQ Psychology
    1 Introducing LGBTQ psychology Overview * What is LGBTQ psychology and why study it? * The scientific study of sexuality and ‘gender ambiguity’ * The historical emergence of ‘gay affirmative’ psychology * Struggling for professional recognition and challenging heteronormativity in psychology What is LGBTQ psychology and why study it? For many people it is not immediately obvious what lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) psychology is (see the glossary for defini- tions of words in bold type). Is it a grouping for LGBTQ people working in psychology? Is it a branch of psychology about LGBTQ people? Although LGBTQ psychology is often assumed to be a support group for LGBTQ people working in psychology, it is in fact the latter: a branch of psychology concerned with the lives and experiences of LGBTQ people. Sometimes it is suggested that this area of psychology would be more accurately named the ‘psychology of sexuality’. Although LGBTQ psychology is concerned with sexuality, it has a much broader focus, examining many different aspects of the lives of LGBTQ people including prejudice and discrimination, parenting and families, and com- ing out and identity development. One question we’re often asked is ‘why do we need a separate branch of psychology for LGBTQ people?’ There are two main reasons for this: first, as we discuss in more detail below, until relatively recently most psychologists (and professionals in related disciplines such as psychiatry) supported the view that homosexuality was a mental illness. ‘Gay affirmative’ psychology, as this area was first known in the 1970s, developed to challenge this perspective and show that homosexuals are psychologically healthy, ‘normal’ individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Cybernetics and BDSM
    Command and Control: Cybernetics and BDSM Katherine Behar Artist 001 212 203 7221 [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper explores correlations between restrictive interfaces in computational systems and restrictive interfaces in BDSM (Bondage & Discipline/Dominance & Submission/Sadism & Masochism) culture. Novel technologies often serve as pet fetish objects, but how do technologies perform as subjects in fetish culture? When digital technologies appear to us as objects, they present us with an illusion of mastery. In reality, technologies are active subjects and we, their "users," must bend to their requirements. In gaming scholarship, the process by which users must first internalize machinic logic in order to win mastery over a machine is termed learning the algorithm. Indeed, in cybernetics command and control through communication has much in common with sexual power dynamics. Both involve getting a partner to do what one wants and to not do what one doesn't want. The dominant consumerist relationship with technologies is Figure 1. 3G56k, Installation view.1 already sexually charged. But in order to imagine an alternative, it becomes crucial to ask where power accumulates and how power functions in our interactions with devices. In a given moment of Human-Computer Interaction, who or what is a master and who or what is a slave? Categories and Subject Descriptors H.1.2 [Information Systems]: User/Machine Systems – human factors, software psychology. General Terms Algorithms, Performance, Design, Economics, Human Factors, Theory. Keywords Cybernetics, BDSM, Fetishism, Sadomasochism, Human- Computer Interaction, Sex, Posthumanism. Figure 2. 3G56k, Still from video loop.2 1. INTRODUCTION I began researching BDSM while working on 3G56k, an This paper argues that sexual practices (of any flavor) and interactive technology installation which stages an illicit, cybernetic feedback systems are two kinds of communicative intergenerational love affair between a giant iPhone and a tower interfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Program
    PORTOBELLO FILM FESTIVAL FREE ENTRY 30 AUGUST– 16 SEPTEMBER 2012 www.portobellofilmfestival.com BLEK LE RAT Entry to all events if FREE and open to all over 18. ALTERNATIVE LONDON FILM FESTIVAL PORTOBELLO ALTERNATIVE PORTOBELLO POP UP CINEMA FILM FESTIVAL LONDON FILM INTERNATIONAL 3 ACKLAM ROAD, W10 5TY 30 Aug – 16 Sept 2012 FESTIVAL FILM FESTIVAL POP UP CINEMA WESTBOURNE Thu 30 Aug Welcome to the 17th Portobello Film Act Of Memory – 30 Aug 3 ACKLAM ROAD, W10 5TY STUDIOS GRAND OPENING Art at Festival. This year is non-stop new 30 August page 1 Portobello 242 ACKLAM ROAD, W10 5JJ CEREMONY London and UK films at the Pop Up Grand Opening Ceremony POP UP CINEMA Film Festival with The Spirit Of Portobello, docoBANKSY, 31 August page 9 2012 and a feast of international movies at and a new film from Ricky Grover International Shorts Introduction Westbourne Studios courtyard and Pop Up 1 September 9 6:30pm Cinema throughout the Festival, plus 7–19th at 31 August 2 The Muse Gallery – see page 18 for details. Westbourne Studios. Just For You London German Night What We Call Cookies up and coming directors inc Greg Hall & Wayne G Saunders (Natalie Hobbs) 2 mins It’s all very well watching films on the 2 September 10 Exploring various British stereotypes held by internet but nothing beats the live 1 September 2 International Feature Films Americans played out by motifs that are iconicly Are You Local? 3 September 11 American. Comedy. independent frontline film experience. West London film makers Turkish & Canadian Showcase Big Society (Nick Scott) 7 mins 2 September 3 An officer in the British army questions what it means We look forward to welcoming film 4 September 11 to fight for your country when he sees his hometown London Calling: From The Westway To British & USA State Of The Movie Art rife with antisocial behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Compass and Why Libertarianism Is Not Right-Wing
    The Political Compass and Why Libertarianism is not Right-Wing J C Lester Abstract The political distinction between left and right remains ideologically muddled. This was not always so, but an immediate return to the pristine usage is impractical. Putting a theory of social liberty to one side, this essay defends the interpretation of left-wing as personal-choice and right-wing as property-choice. This allows an axis that is north/choice (or state-free) and south/control (or state-ruled). This Political Compass clarifies matters without being tendentious or too complicated. It shows that what is called ‘libertarianism’ is north-wing. A quiz gives the reader’s Political Compass reading. Pristine clarity and modern confusion The modern political left/right division is too crude to accommodate many important political positions in a way that makes any sense. Libertarianism (or extreme classical liberalism) is sometimes placed, often implicitly or vaguely, somewhere on the extreme right. But can we say whether it ought to be to the right or left of other „right-wing‟ ideologies? How are we to indicate the extreme tolerance of personal choice (as regards drug use and consenting sexual practices, for instance) that libertarianism entails but which is not normally thought of as being right-wing? Samuel Brittan sees clearly the confusion in the modern left and right (though assuming a libertarian view of liberty): The dilemma of the [classical] liberal is that while Conservatives now use the language of individual freedom, they apply this only—if at all—to domestic economic questions. They are the less libertarian of the two parties—despite individual exceptions—on all matters of personal and social conduct, and are much the more hawk-like in their attitude to „foreign affairs‟.
    [Show full text]