Le Pianiste: Parisian Music Journalism and the Politics of the Piano, 1833–35

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Le Pianiste: Parisian Music Journalism and the Politics of the Piano, 1833–35 City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2016 Le Pianiste: Parisian Music Journalism and the Politics of the Piano, 1833–35 Shaena B. Weitz Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/760 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] LE PIANISTE: PARISIAN MUSIC JOURNALISM AND THE POLITICS OF THE PIANO, 1833–35 By SHAENA B. WEITZ A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York Graduate Center 2016 ii © 2016 SHAENA B. WEITZ All Rights Reserved iii LE PIANISTE: PARISIAN MUSIC JOURNALISM AND THE POLITICS OF THE PIANO, 1833–35 By SHAENA B. WEITZ This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Musicology to satisfy the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Janette Tilley ___________________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Norman Carey ___________________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Anne Stone Richard Kramer Dana Gooley Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract LE PIANISTE: PARISIAN MUSIC JOURNALISM AND THE POLITICS OF THE PIANO, 1833–35 By Shaena B. Weitz Advisor: Anne Stone This dissertation examines the French music journal entitled Le Pianiste, published in Paris from 1833 to 1835. Through an analysis of the journal’s contents, it reconsiders the nature of music journalism and musical life in Paris at the time it was in print, focusing in particular on canon formation and the power of the press. Le Pianiste’s remarkably detailed descriptions and analysis of the French music world challenge long-held perceptions of the era about taste and reception history, yet it remains an unstudied document. While past work on the music press has focused on criticism and reception, this project probes the very nature of music journalism itself as a vehicle for power, influence, and money and aims to elucidate the complex relationship between composer, publisher, and critic, who in the case of Le Pianiste’s writers, were one in the same. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS So much of the economy of research is based on help, and acknowledging the profound support that one has received inevitably leads to rumination on one’s own shortcomings. It is, after all, the people that offer advice and encouragement in times of distress that generally mean the most. First, I would like to thank two departed mentors: Adrienne Fried Bloch and Ora Frishberg Saloman. Adrienne tried to make an Americanist out of me, but I learned a lot from her about research and musicology in my early days as a doctoral student. Ora Saloman, my first advisor, showed excitement in my research when I was unsure, and her intensity for life was impressive. Thanks are due to Anne Stone, for “adopting” me when Ora died, and for guiding me through the challenging middle and late stages of my dissertation research. We accomplished a lot together. Thank you to my committee: Janette Tilley, who served as an enthusiastic chair and whose correspondence was always swift; Dana Gooley, whose enthusiasm and support flatters me, and whose feedback I cherish. Special thanks are due to Richard Kramer, my first reader, whose keen eye and delicate thoughts always impress me and inspire me to do more. Thanks to Allan Atlas, whose legendary no-nonsense advice has proved invaluable to me. Thanks to those senior scholars who have offered advice on my work: Dana Gooley, Katharine Ellis, William Weber, Kenneth Hamilton, Rohan Stewart-McDonald, John Graziano, and many others. Thanks are also due to CUNY for supporting my research with a significant dissertation grant and research scholarships. Thank you to the libraries that helped in my research, especially the Bibliothèque nationale de France and the Archives nationales, but also to the New York Public Library, the Library of Congress, and the British Library. And of course, I thank my parents Brian and Katherine, my brother Evan, and my husband Maayan, for being there for me in ways that only family can. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 Le Pianiste’s Authors and Administration ......................................................................................6 Le Pianiste’s Goals ........................................................................................................................12 Circulation and Subscribers ...........................................................................................................16 Le Pianiste’s Closure...................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 1: The Business of the Press .........................................................................................28 The Press and the Government ......................................................................................................32 Turning a Profit (Or not) ................................................................................................................39 Consequences for Bad Behavior ....................................................................................................43 Chapter 2: Perruques and Fathers: Le Pianiste’s Early History of the Piano ........................63 Background and Context ...............................................................................................................64 Adam and the Nationalistic Argument ..........................................................................................67 Le Pianiste and the Past .................................................................................................................71 The “Fathers of Piano” Muzio Clementi......................................................................................................... 78 Johann-Baptiste Cramer ............................................................................................81 Daniel Steibelt .......................................................................................................... 83 Jan Ladislav Dussek.................................................................................................. 87 The “New German” Tradition — Hummel and Beethoven ...........................................................95 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................106 vii Chapter 3: Music “for the Eyes”: On Virtuosity and the 1820s ............................................109 Ignaz Moscheles’s Parisian Debut ...............................................................................................112 Carl Czerny, Variety, and Speed ...................................................................................................117 Johann-Peter Pixis, Henri Bertini, and Resistance....................................................................... 123 Ferdinand Hérold .........................................................................................................................131 Frédéric Kalkbrenner ...................................................................................................................134 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................142 Chapter 4: “Talent is so young these days”: New Music and the Romantic Generation ....145 Frédéric Chopin............................................................................................................................ 147 Franz Liszt ................................................................................................................................... 161 Ferdinand Hiller ...........................................................................................................................171 Henri Herz ................................................................................................................................... 178 First encounters with the music of Schubert, Mendelssohn, and Schumann ..............................186 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................194 Appendices Appendix 1: Concert Reviews in Le Pianiste ..............................................................................197 Appendix 2: Chaulieu work list by opus ..................................................................................... 209 Bibliography ...............................................................................................................................218 viii List of Tables Introduction: Table I-1: Borrowed contributions of identified origin.................................................................. 10 Table I-2: Borrowed contributions of unknown origin ..................................................................10 Table I-3: Letters to the editor ........................................................................................................11
Recommended publications
  • Vienna, 30Th January, 18062 . . . Every Monday, Which Has Been My Usual
    1807 1375. CONSTANZE MOZART TO HER SON CARL THOMAS,1 MILAN EXCERPT: Vienna, 30th January, 18062 . Every Monday, which has been my usual society day for a couple of years now, we have beautiful music here at home, thanks to the foreign virtuosos; but those who particularly distinguish themselves are the two Pixis3 brothers from Mannheim, [5] the elder on the violin, a pupil of Vioti,4 and the younger on the pianoforte. In particular Herr Seidler5 from Berlin, a quite outstanding violinist who is now based in Paris and, they say, is in no way inferior to the famous Rode.6 You should just hear him playing your father’s quartets! – What would I give if you could join us to hear them. [10] These are fine people, all have already given public concerts, they have already been here for the whole winter, and although they are here to give concerts, for which most artists, as you know, make themselves scarce, they nevertheless play here in my home every Monday, and in fact compete with each other and leave me the winner, as you can easily imagine. Everyone wants a chance to perform, and this way I hear them all, [15] and that very frequently; they all send their heartiest greetings. Your brother7 is now going to Salieri8 and to Humel.9 Both have a great deal of affection and friendship for him, my only fear is that he does not make the use of them that he should, for is not always good if one has too much help because one relies on it too much, and when one no longer has any, one cannot help oneself, [20] and this is really my complaint.
    [Show full text]
  • A Register of Music Performed in Concert, Nazareth, Pennsylvania from 1796 to 1845: an Annotated Edition of an American Moravian Document
    A register of music performed in concert, Nazareth, Pennsylvania from 1796 to 1845: an annotated edition of an American Moravian document Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Strauss, Barbara Jo, 1947- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 23:14:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/347995 A REGISTER OF MUSIC PERFORMED IN CONCERT, NAZARETH., PENNSYLVANIA FROM 1796 TO 181+52 AN ANNOTATED EDITION OF AN AMERICAN.MORAVIAN DOCUMENT by Barbara Jo Strauss A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF MUSIC In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF MUSIC WITH A MAJOR IN MUSIC HISTORY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 6 Copyright 1976 Barbara Jo Strauss STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The Univer­ sity of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate ac­ knowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manu­ script in whole or in part may
    [Show full text]
  • Historie Der Rheinischen Musikschule Teil 1 Mit Einem Beitrag Von Professor Heinrich Lindlahr
    Historie der Rheinischen Musikschule Teil 1 Mit einem Beitrag von Professor Heinrich Lindlahr Zur Geschichte des Musikschulwesens in Köln 1815 - 1925 Zu Beginn des musikfreundlichen 19. Jahrhunderts blieb es in Köln bei hochfliegenden Plänen und deren erfolgreicher Verhinderung. 1815, Köln zählte etwa fünfundzwanzigtausend Seelen, die soeben, wie die Bewohner der Rheinprovinz insgesamt, beim Wiener Kongreß an das Königreich Preußen gefallen waren, 1815 also hatte von Köln aus ein ungenannter Musikenthusiast für die Rheinmetropole eine Ausbildungsstätte nach dem Vorbild des Conservatoire de Paris gefordert. Sein Vorschlag erschien in der von Friedrich Rochlitz herausgegebenen führenden Allgemeinen musikalischen Zeitung zu Leipzig. Doch Aufrufe solcher Art verloren sich hierorts, obschon Ansätze zu einem brauchbaren Musikschulgebilde in Köln bereits bestanden hatten: einmal in Gestalt eines Konservatorienplanes, wie ihn der neue Maire der vormaligen Reichstadt, Herr von VVittgenstein, aus eingezogenen kirchlichen Stiftungen in Vorschlag gebracht hatte, vorwiegend aus Restklassen von Sing- und Kapellschulen an St. Gereon, an St. Aposteln, bei den Ursulinen und anderswo mehr, zum anderen in Gestalt von Heimkursen und Familienkonzerten, wie sie der seit dem Einzug der Franzosen, 1794, stellenlos gewordene Salzmüdder und Domkapellmeister Dr. jur. Bernhard Joseph Mäurer führte. Unklar blieb indessen, ob sich der Zusammenschluss zu einem Gesamtprojekt nach den Vorstellungen Dr. Mäurers oder des Herrn von Wittgenstein oder auch jenes Anonymus deshalb zerschlug, weil die Durchführung von Domkonzerten an Sonn- und Feiertagen kirchenfremden und besatzungsfreundlichen Lehrkräften hätte zufallen sollen, oder mehr noch deshalb, weil es nach wie vor ein nicht überschaubares Hindernisrennen rivalisierender Musikparteien gab, deren manche nach Privatabsichten berechnet werden müssten, wie es die Leipziger Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung von 1815 lakonisch zu kommentieren wusste.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The present volume contains Carl Philipp Emanuel revision of the body of work that had accrued up to that Bach’s first two published sets of keyboard sonatas: the time.2 For the publication of his two keyboard cycles, Bach six “Prussian” (Wq 48) and six “Württemberg” (Wq 49) chose engravers and printers from Nuremberg: Balthasar Sonatas. The exact date of publication for each collection Schmid for Wq 48, and Johann Wilhelm Windter/Johann is not entirely clear. NV 1790 gives 1743 for the first set Ulrich Haffner for Wq 49. The connection with Nurem- and 1745 for the second, while the Autobiography gives 1742 berg, for which Bach’s father likely served as the catalyst, and 1744, respectively. Advertisements in the Nuremberg lasted well into the 1760s.3 newspaper Friedens- und Kriegs-Currier might have pro- The source situation of the “Prussian” and “Württem- vided some clarification, but no mention has been found berg” Sonatas may be described as quite favorable: both of the Wq 48 print in any of the 1742 issues, and no issues exist in authorized prints. After their publication Bach from 1743 or 1744 appear to be extant. An advertisement most likely destroyed or gave away the original autographs, for the Wq 49 set does show up in 1745, but this is proba- as he would do with later prints. Some autograph sketch bly not for the first printing. A composition date for each material exists for Wq 49/3 (see appendix), and some em- of the twelve sonatas is given in NV 1790; for Wq 48 the bellishments and varied reprises exist for Wq 49/6 (see dates range from 1740 to 1742, and for Wq 49 from 1742 source A), but no other source has survived that can be to 1744.
    [Show full text]
  • Louise Farrenc (1804-1875)
    Universität für Musik und darstellende Kunst Graz Institut 15: Alte Musik und Aufführungspraxis „Eine Künstlerin, hochverdient und mit einer ganz männlichen musikalischen Gestaltungsgabe …“ Louise Farrenc (1804-1875) Pianistin, Komponistin, Pädagogin, Editorin Wissenschaftliche Bachelorarbeit vorgelegt von Irina Vaterl Betreut durch Ao.Univ.Prof. Mag.phil. Dr.phil Ingeborg Harer September 2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort ............................................................................................................. 4 Einleitung und Forschungsstand ................................................................... 6 TEIL 1. Louise Farrenc. Biografie .................................................................. 9 Paris um 1800 ....................................................................................... 10 Familie Dumont- eine Künstlerfamilie über Generationen .................... 11 Kindheit in der Künstlersiedlung ........................................................... 16 Die musikalische Ausbildung ................................................................ 18 Ehe mit Aristide Farrenc ....................................................................... 20 Victorine Farrenc .................................................................................. 23 Die letzten Lebensjahre ........................................................................ 25 TEIL 2. Louise Farrenc. Pianistin, Komponistin, Pädagogin, Editorin ..... 28 Die Pianistin Louise Farrenc ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beethoven's 250Th Birthday Music Room Objects
    Beethoven’s 250th Birthday Music Room Objects Portrait of Beethoven (altered a bit for the festivities). This year we are celebrating the 250th birthday of the enduringly popular composer Ludwig van Beethoven who was born around December 17, 1770 (his baptism date). Beethoven never married, but there has been much speculation about whom he wrote the piece Für Elise. Two portraits on the wall are of women who are possible “candidates.” Portrait of Elisabeth Röckel. “According to a 2010 study by Klaus Martin Kopitz, there is evidence that the piece was written for the 17-year-old German soprano singer Elisabeth Röckel (1793–1883)... who played Florestan in the 1806 revival of Beethoven's opera Fidelio. "Elise", as she was called by a parish priest (later she called herself "Betty"), had been a friend of Beethoven's since 1808, who, according to Kopitz, perhaps wanted to marry her.” (from Wikipedia’s Für Elise entry) Portrait of Therese Malfatti. “Max Unger suggested that Ludwig Nohl may have transcribed the title incorrectly and the original work may have been named "Für Therese",[10] a reference to Therese Malfatti von Rohrenbach zu Dezza (1792–1851). She was a friend and student of Beethoven's to whom he supposedly proposed in 1810.” (from Wikipedia’s Für Elise entry) Portrait of Daniel Steibelt. Steibelt was one of Europe's most renowned piano virtuosos, competed against Beethoven in an improvisation contest. “Steibelt, realising he was not only being comprehensively outplayed but humiliated, strode out of the room. Prince Lobkowitz hurried after him, returning a few moments later to say Steibelt had said he would never again set foot in Vienna as long as Beethoven lived there.” (from The man who dared to challenge Beethoven to a musical duel in Vienna) Beethoven’s Broadwood fortepiano.
    [Show full text]
  • Sampling and Remixes
    DE FR EN SEARCH Sampling and Remixes The articles about arrangements in the “Good to know” series have so far focused on “conventional” arrangements of musical works. Sampling and remixes are two additional and specic forms of arrangement. What rights need to be secured when existing recordings are used to produce a new work? What agreements have to be contracted? Text by Claudia Kempf and Michael Wohlgemuth From the copyright point of view, remixes and sampling are specic forms of arrangement. (Photo: Tabea Hüberli) Sound samplings come in many dierent forms and techniques. But they all have one thing in common: they incorporate parts of a musical recording into a new work. This regularly raises the question whether such parts of works or samples are protected by copyright or – especially in the case of very short sound sequences – whether they may be used freely. In the case of a remix, an existing production is taken and re-arranged and re-mixed. This may involve taking apart a whole work and putting it together again with the addition of new elements. Theoretically, the degree of re-arrangement in a remix may range from a simple cover version to a completely new arrangement. As a rule, a remix is simply an arrangement. Remixes generally keep a work’s existing title and add a tag which refers either to the form of use (radio edit / extended club version, or similar) or the name of the remixer (generally a well-known DJ). By contrast with conventional arrangements, in addition to using an existing work to create a derived work or arrangement, samples and remixes also use an existing sound recording.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Woelfl Streichquartette Op. 4 Und Op. 10
    Joseph Woelfl Streichquartette Op. 4 und Op. 10 Quatuor Mosaïques Erich Höbarth und Andrea Bischof, Violine Anita Mitterer, Viola Christophe Coin, Violoncello paladino music Quatuor Mosaïques Erich Höbarth und/and Andrea Bischof Violinen, Franz Geissenhof, Wien 1806, Inv.-Nrr. SAM 683 und 684 Violins, Franz Geissenhof, Vienna 1806, Inv.-No. SAM 683 and 684 Anita Mitterer Abb. auf S. 1: Viola, Franz Geissenhof, Violine, Franz Geissenhof, Wien 1806, Wien 1797, Inv.-Nr. SAM 683 Inv.-Nr. SAM 685 Ill. on p. 1: Viola, Franz Geissenhof, Violin, Franz Geissenhof, Vienna 1806, Vienna 1797, Inv.-No. SAM 683 Inv.-No. SAM 685 Christophe Coin Violoncello, Franz Geissenhof, Wien 1794, Inv.-Nr. SAM 686 Violoncello, Franz Geissenhof, Vienna 1794, Inv.-No. SAM 686 Deutsch: Seite Franz Geissenhofs Instrumente 4 Joseph Woelfl 7 English: page Franz Geissenhof‘s instruments 12 Joseph Woelfl 15 2 FRANZ GEISSENHOFS INSTRUMENTE Joseph Woelfl (1773 –1812) Streichquartett Op. 4 Nr. 3, c-Moll 01 Allegro 7'46 02 Menuetto (Allegretto) 4'37 03 Adagio ma non troppo 7'35 04 Finale (Presto) 5'57 Streichquartett Op. 10 Nr. 4, G-Dur 05 Allegro 7'24 06 Menuetto (Allegro) 3'41 07 Andante 5'10 08 Prestissimo 4'16 Streichquartett Op. 10 Nr. 1, C-Dur 09 Allegro moderato 7'35 10 Andante 8'11 11 Menuetto (Allegro) 4'05 12 Allegro 5'26 Gesamtspielzeit / total duration: 74'00 3 FRANZ GEISSENHOFS INSTRUMENTE Druckzettel von Franz Geissenhofs Violine von 1806 Inv.-Nr. SAM 683 Franz Geissenhof war der einflussreichste Geigenbauer zur Zeit der Wiener Klassik. Völlig zu Recht wurde er bereits kurz nach seinem Tod mit dem Beinamen eines „Wiener Stradivari“ Printed label of Franz Geissenhof’s violin bedacht, was nicht nur als eine schmeichelhafte Anspielung auf seine handwerklichen Fähig- from 1806 Inv.-No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pedagogical Legacy of Johann Nepomuk Hummel
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE PEDAGOGICAL LEGACY OF JOHANN NEPOMUK HUMMEL. Jarl Olaf Hulbert, Doctor of Philosophy, 2006 Directed By: Professor Shelley G. Davis School of Music, Division of Musicology & Ethnomusicology Johann Nepomuk Hummel (1778-1837), a student of Mozart and Haydn, and colleague of Beethoven, made a spectacular ascent from child-prodigy to pianist- superstar. A composer with considerable output, he garnered enormous recognition as piano virtuoso and teacher. Acclaimed for his dazzling, beautifully clean, and elegant legato playing, his superb pedagogical skills made him a much sought after and highly paid teacher. This dissertation examines Hummel’s eminent role as piano pedagogue reassessing his legacy. Furthering previous research (e.g. Karl Benyovszky, Marion Barnum, Joel Sachs) with newly consulted archival material, this study focuses on the impact of Hummel on his students. Part One deals with Hummel’s biography and his seminal piano treatise, Ausführliche theoretisch-practische Anweisung zum Piano- Forte-Spiel, vom ersten Elementar-Unterrichte an, bis zur vollkommensten Ausbildung, 1828 (published in German, English, French, and Italian). Part Two discusses Hummel, the pedagogue; the impact on his star-students, notably Adolph Henselt, Ferdinand Hiller, and Sigismond Thalberg; his influence on musicians such as Chopin and Mendelssohn; and the spreading of his method throughout Europe and the US. Part Three deals with the precipitous decline of Hummel’s reputation, particularly after severe attacks by Robert Schumann. His recent resurgence as a musician of note is exemplified in a case study of the changes in the appreciation of the Septet in D Minor, one of Hummel’s most celebrated compositions.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary for Music the Glossary for Music Includes Terms Commonly Found in Music Education and for Performance Techniques
    Glossary for Music The glossary for Music includes terms commonly found in music education and for performance techniques. The intent of the glossary is to promote consistent terminology when creating curriculum and assessment documents as well as communicating with stakeholders. Ability: natural aptitude in specific skills and processes; what the student is apt to do, without formal instruction. Analog tools: category of musical instruments and tools that are non-digital (i.e., do not transfer sound in or convert sound into binary code), such as acoustic instruments, microphones, monitors, and speakers. Analyze: examine in detail the structure and context of the music. Arrangement: setting or adaptation of an existing musical composition Arranger: person who creates alternative settings or adaptations of existing music. Articulation: characteristic way in which musical tones are connected, separated, or accented; types of articulation include legato (smooth, connected tones) and staccato (short, detached tones). Artistic literacy: knowledge and understanding required to participate authentically in the arts Atonality: music in which no tonic or key center is apparent. Artistic Processes: Organizational principles of the 2014 National Core Standards for the Arts: Creating, Performing, Responding, and Connecting. Audiate: hear and comprehend sounds in one’s head (inner hearing), even when no sound is present. Audience etiquette: social behavior observed by those attending musical performances and which can vary depending upon the type of music performed. Benchmark: pre-established definition of an achievement level, designed to help measure student progress toward a goal or standard, expressed either in writing or as an example of scored student work (aka, anchor set).
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS RELEASE for IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 4, 2017
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 4, 2017 Presenting the first 2018 rendezvous at the Maison symphonique! From the moment the curtain rises on 2018, the Orchestre symphonique de Montréal will be kicking off its year of tribute to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the death of Sergei Rachmaninoff in grand style. For the occasion, under the direction of Kent Nagano, we will present the composer’s celebrated Second Piano Concerto, performed by Yevgeny Sudbin. The acclaimed pianist from St. Petersburg will also perform a recital showcasing Russian music. As well, Rachmaninoff’s moving Symphony no. 2, conducted by Conrad van Alphen, will give the public a chance to hear the young flutist Benjamin Morency, the OSM Manulife Competition’s Grand Prize winner. The year 2018 will also mark the first Montréal appearance by British pianist Paul Lewis and the return of Spanish conductor Juanjo Mena, in the concert BEETHOVEN AND TCHAIKOVSKY. Lastly, VIENNA AND PARIS, 1800, a concert of chamber music presented at Bourgie Hall, will conclude the program for January. SUDBIN PLAYS RACHMANINOFF’S SECOND CONCERTO TUESDAY 9 AND SATURDAY 13 JANUARY 2018, 8 PM Sergei Rachmaninoff’s ravishing Second Piano Concerto, whose second movement inspired Eric Carmen’s song All By Myself, will enrapture Maison symphonique audiences in this, our first musical rendezvous of 2018. Russian pianist Yevgeny Sudbin will perform the concerto’s beautiful melody. Acclaimed for his remarkable interpretations of the works of Sergei Rachmaninoff, Sudbin will be joined by Andrew Wan, violin, Brian Manker, cello and Philip Chiu, piano. This concert is presented by Air Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • String Quartets Dedicated to Joseph Haydn K
    WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART String Quartets dedicated to Joseph Haydn K. 421, 458 ‘Hunt’ & 464 CUARTETO CASALS FRANZ LISZT WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART (1756-1791) String Quartets dedicated to Joseph Haydn (vol. 2) String Quartet no. 15 in D minor K. 421 ré mineur / d-Moll 1 | I. Allegro moderato 10’47 2 | II. Andante 6’08 3 | III. Menuetto - Trio. Allegretto 3’41 4 | IV. Allegretto ma non troppo 8’26 String Quartet no. 17 in B flat major K. 458, ‘Hunt’ Si bémol majeur “La Chasse” / B-Dur „Jagdquartett“ 5 | I. Allegro vivace assai 8’13 6 | II. Menuetto - Trio. Moderato 4’07 7 | III. Adagio 6’53 8 | IV. Allegro assai 6’13 String Quartet no. 18 in A major K. 464 La majeur / A-Dur 9 | I. Allegro 6’51 10 | II. Menuetto - Trio 5’23 11 | III. Andante 10’41 12 | IV. Allegro non troppo 6’19 CUARTETO CASALS Abel Tomàs Realp, violin Vera Martínez Mehner, violin Jonathan Brown, viola Arnau Tomàs Realp, cello Mozart : Trois Quatuors dédiés à Haydn Les trois Quatuors à cordes K. 421, 458 et 464, ainsi que les Quatuors K. 387, 428 et 465 forment un cycle d’œuvres que Le Quatuor à cordes en si bémol majeur K. 458 fut achevé le 9 novembre 1784, selon l’indication du catalogue de Mozart fait publier à Vienne, en 1785. L’édition princeps est dédiée au “Signor Giuseppe Haydn, Maestro di Cappella ses œuvres que Mozart lui-même a rédigé. Bien qu’il soit chronologiquement le quatrième des “Quatuors dédiés à di S.[ua] A.[ltezza] il Principe d’Esterházy” ; c’est pourquoi ces six quatuors de Mozart sont également connus sous Haydn” (le troisième, le K.
    [Show full text]