DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index For STRENGTHENING STRENGTHENING CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY GLOBALLY GLOBALLY 2018 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION SUSTAINABILITY INDEX CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND EURASIA 22nd EDITION – SEPTEMBER 2019 2018 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION SUSTAINABILITY INDEX FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND EURASIA 22nd EDITION - SEPTEMBER 2019 Developed by: United States Agency for International Development Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance In Partnership With: FHI 360 International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) Acknowledgment: This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-LA-17- 00003. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the panelists and other project researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or FHI 360. Cover Photo: Empowering Kosovo Youth through Critical Thinking Workshop titled "Point of View." This critical thinking and writing workshop gathered around fifty young men and women from both urban and rural areas in Kosovo in order to bring attention to youth concerns and promote youth engagement in the public sphere. This specific activity focused on the identification of youth needs and priorities. Photo Credit: USAID/Kosovo TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2018 CSO SUSTAINABILITY INDEX Albania ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Armenia .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Azerbaijan .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Belarus ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................................................................................. 49 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 58 Croatia ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 67 Czech Republic ................................................................................................................................................................................. 77 Estonia ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 86 Georgia ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 94 Hungary ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 102 Kosovo ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 112 Latvia ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 121 Lithuania .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 130 Moldova ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 140 Montenegro .................................................................................................................................................................................... 150 North Macedonia .......................................................................................................................................................................... 159 Poland............................................................................................................................................................................................... 168 Romania ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 178 Russia ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 188 Serbia ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 200 Slovakia ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 210 Slovenia ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 219 Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 229 ANNEX A: CSO SUSTAINABILITY INDEX METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 238 ANNEX B: STATISTICAL DATA .................................................................................................................................................. 253 ANNEX C: REGIONAL MAP ......................................................................................................................................................... 256 The 2018 CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia FOREWORD The Great Polarization The trend of democratic backsliding and the conflicts it has caused between government authorities and civil society has been noted in these reports for several years now. In recent years, we increasingly have seen society itself being divided along hard lines, with individuals and organizations who once would have classified themselves as competitors or political rivals in the context of a pluralistic system now viewing their opponents as mortal enemies. We see this “great polarization” occurring rapidly in several countries featured in this edition of the CSO Sustainability Index, including Hungary, Poland, and Romania, to name a few. These societies are becoming increasingly fragmented into two enemy camps with very little common ground between them, and virtually no room for dialogue or compromise. These processes of political polarization are increasingly being mirrored in new cracks, divisions, and friction within the civil society community itself, as highlighted in the Executive Summary that follows. In some countries, civil society as a whole has fractured along political lines. This breakdown of political pluralism cannot but worry those of us concerned not only with the survival of democracy but also the preservation of liberal values, including dialogue and compromise. Civil society is naturally a community divided by different groups’ interests, by varied worldviews, and different conceptions on how to best organize society. However, despite their political and social differences, CSOs must unite for the common good of their countries, including by respecting those whose conception of that common good differs from their own. As the great Russian author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said, “the line between good and evil does not separate neighbor from neighbor, or country from country, but goes straight through a human heart!” Michael Kott Director, Civil Society and Peacebuilding FHI 360 The 2018 CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey's Kurdish Initiatives
    ARTICLE IDENTITY, NARRATIVE AND FRAMES: ASSESSING TURKEY’S KURDISH INITIATIVES Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey’s Kurdish Initiatives JOHANNA NYKÄNEN* ABSTRACT In 2009 the Turkish government launched a novel initiative to tackle the Kurdish question. The initiative soon ran into deadlock, only to be un- tangled towards the end of 2012 when a new policy was announced. This comparative paper adopts Michael Barnett’s trinity of identity, narratives and frames to show how a cultural space within which a peaceful engage- ment with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) would be deemed legiti- mate and desirable was carved out. Comparisons between the two policies reveal that the framing of policy narratives can have a formative impact on their outcomes. The paper demonstrates how the governing quality of firmness fluctuated between different connotations and references, finally leading back to a deep-rooted tradition in Turkish governance. ince 1984 when the PKK commenced its armed struggle against the Turkish state, Turkish security policies have been framed around the SKurdish question with the PKK presented as the primary security threat to be tackled. Turkey’s Kurdish question has its roots in the founding of the republic in 1923, which saw Kurdish ethnicity assimilated with Turkishness. In accordance with the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), only three minorities were and continue to be officially recognized in Turkey: Armenians, Jews and Greeks. These three groups were granted minority status on the basis of their religion. Kurdish identity – whether national, racial or ethnic – was not recognized by the republic, resulting in decades of uprisings by the Kurds and oppressive and * Department assimilative politics by the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia Before the Elections
    PERSPECTIVE Realignment of the party system – Slovenia before the elections ALEŠ MAVER AND UROŠ URBAS November 2011 The coalition government under Social Democrat Prime make people redundant. Nevertheless, the unemploy- Minister Borut Pahor lost the support it needed in Parlia- ment rate increased by 75 per cent to 107,000 over three ment and early elections had to be called for 4 Decem- years. This policy was financed by loans of 8 billion eu- ber, one year before completing its term of office. What ros, which doubled the public deficit. are the reasons for this development? Which parties are now seeking votes in the »political marketplace«? What However, Prime Minister Pahor overestimated his popu- coalitions are possible after 4 December? And what chal- larity in a situation in which everybody hoped that the lenges will the new government face? economic crisis would soon be over. The governing par- ties had completely different priorities: they were seek- ing economic rents; they could not resist the pressure of Why did the government of lobbies and made concessions; and they were too preoc- Prime Minister Borut Pahor fail? cupied with scandals and other affairs emerging from the ranks of the governing coalition. Although the governing coalition was homogeneously left-wing, it could not work together and registered no significant achievements. The next government will thus Electoral history and development be compelled to achieve something. Due to the deterio- of the party system rating economic situation – for 2012 1 per cent GDP growth, 1.3 per cent inflation, 8.4 per cent unemploy- Since the re-introduction of the multi-party system Slo- ment and a 5.3 per cent budget deficit are predicted – venia has held general elections in 1990, 1992, 1996, the goals will be economic.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Page 1 of 13
    Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Armenia Page 1 of 13 Armenia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 Armenia, with a population of approximately 3.2 million, is a republic. The constitution provides for a popularly elected president (Robert Kocharian) and a unicameral legislature (National Assembly). A constitutional referendum in 2005 and presidential and National Assembly elections in 2003 were seriously flawed and did not meet international standards. The country has a multiparty political system. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces; members of the security forces committed a number of human rights abuses. The government's human rights record remained poor, and serious problems remained. Citizens were not able freely to change their government; authorities beat pretrial detainees; the national security service and the national police force acted with impunity; authorities engaged in arbitrary arrest and detention; prison conditions were cramped and unhealthy, although slowly improving; authorities imposed restrictions on citizens' privacy, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly. Journalists practiced self-censorship, and the government and laws restricted religious freedom. Violence against women and spousal abuse were problems, as were trafficking in persons, discrimination against persons with disabilities, and societal harassment of homosexuals. There were reports of forced labor. There were some improvements during the year. The implementation of constitutional reforms ratified in 2005 led to some increase in judicial independence and for the first time gave citizens direct access to the Constitutional Court. Penalties for trafficking were toughened and a court for the first time imposed financial, as well as criminal, penalties on traffickers.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Turkey in Europe. Political, Economic, and Foreign Policy
    ISSN 2239-2122 9 IAI Research Papers The EU is changing, Turkey too, and - above all - there is systemic change and crisis all G round, ranging from economics, the spread of democratic norms and foreign policy. LOBAL The IAI Research Papers are brief monographs written by one or N.1 European Security and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, This research paper explores how the EU and Turkey can enhance their cooperation in more authors (IAI or external experts) on current problems of inter- T edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Erik Jones, 2011 URKEY GLOBAL TURKEY national politics and international relations. The aim is to promote the political, economic, and foreign policy domains and how they can find a way out of the stalemate EU-Turkey relations have reached with the lack of progress in accession greater and more up to date knowledge of emerging issues and N. 2 Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty, IN trends and help prompt public debate. edited by Raaello Matarazzo, 2011 negotiations and the increasing uncertainty over both the future of the European project E after the Eurozone crisis and Turkey’s role in it. UROPE IN EUROPE N. 3 The Challenges of State Sustainability in the Mediterranean, edited by Silvia Colombo and Nathalie Tocci, 2011 A non-profit organization, IAI was founded in 1965 by Altiero Spinel- li, its first director. N. 4 Re-thinking Western Policies in Light of the Arab Uprisings, SENEM AYDIN-DÜZGIT is Assistant Professor at the Istanbul Bilgi University and Senior POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND FOREIGN POLICY edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Miguel Haubrich-Seco, 2012 Research Affiliate of the Istanbul Policy Centre (IPC).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia-Armenia
    SHS Web of Conferences 29, 01040 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162901040 EEIA - 2016 Russian Language as a Factor of Strengthening Unified Humanitarian and Educational Space of CIS: Russia-Armenia Tigran E. Marinosyan1,*, and Yulia G. Kurovskaya2 1 ISED RAE, Laboratory of Theoretical Pedagogy and Philosophy of Education, 105062, Moscow, Russia 2 ISED RAE, Academic Secretary, 105062, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The article deals with the problem of language unity and communication gaps between the post-Soviet countries retrospectively, which is important for determining the direction of the future development of the members of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). The focus is on the language situation in Russia and Armenia, two countries which have long- standing and strong friendly bonds based on successful cooperation in addressing important international problems, including in the education sphere. The aspects covered in the article include normative-legal documentation regulating state language policies; the role of the native language in education; the issue of the status of the Russian language in oral and written communication. The relations between the peoples inhabiting Russia interactions. Of particular importance is the problem of have played an important and in many ways critical role preserving, strengthening and expanding the common in the history of the formation and development of the language basis on the Commonwealth territory, the use Russian multinational state. The study of the of Russian as the universal instrument of forming a relationships among the peoples living on Russia’s unified educational space and the development of territory has been relevant at all times not only for relations among CIS countries in general.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008
    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008 June 2008 - N°499/2 Mission in Armenia, 29 March to 3 April 2008 FOREWORD Alerted by both the "Democracy in Armenia" group and the Civil Society Institute (an FIDH affiliate) to the violent repression that followed the presidential elections in this country in February 2008, the undersigned lawyers and jurist were mandated by the President of the Paris Bar Association (M. le Bâtonnier de l’Ordre des Avocats de Paris) and the International Union of Lawyers (l’Union Internationale des Avocats) on one hand and, on the other hand, the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights). The mission visited Yerevan from 29 March to 3 April to report on the situation of the right to defend oneself and the right to freedoms in the Republic of ARMENIA following the events that took place in February and March 2008. INTRODUCTION Before considering the legal and juridical context of the mission's work, it is appropriate to recall some chronological milestones to put into perspective the current situation in Armenia and its evolution, seventeen years after the independence of the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed in the Southern Caucasus. - 21 September, 1991: the Republic of Armenia becomes independent following a referendum. - October 1991: Election by universal suffrage of Mr. Levon TER-PETROSIAN, who becomes the first President of the Republic of Armenia. - 1992-1994: Fighting in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh between the opposing Armenian self- defence forces and the Azerbaijan armed forces. A cease-fire comes into force on 14 May 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Exporter Guide
    Required Report: Required - Public Distribution Date: December 30,2019 Report Number: BK2019-0009 Report Name: Exporter Guide Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina Post: Sarajevo Report Category: Exporter Guide Prepared By: Sanela Stanojcic-Eminagic Approved By: Frederick Giles Report Highlights: Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) imports approximately two-thirds of its overall food needs. The market for processed foods focuses mainly on value rather than quality, as consumers seek to extend their buying power. Advantages to U.S. exporters include relatively low food import tariffs and low costs for introduction and promotion of new products while challenges consist of a complicated dual system of government authorities, low incomes, and poor infrastructure. Opportunities exist for U.S. genetics, beef, pulses, wine, seafood, dried fruits and tree nuts. This report contains marketing tips, information on importing foods, and best products prospect. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Market Fact Sheet Quick Facts CY2018 Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is in the Southeast of Europe with a population of 3.5 million. Import of Consumer-Oriented Products $1.1B. It currently has status as a potential candidate for European Union (EU) membership, which is seen as a List of Top 10 Growth Products in BiH driver to further economic growth and development. 1) Beverages and Mineral Water 6) Sauces and Spices BiH has a large foreign trade deficit with imports almost 2) Chocolate 7) Citrus fruit two times greater than exports. 3) Biscuits and Cookies 8) Wine Import of agri-food products totaled $1.8 billion in 2018 4) Beer 9) Ice-cream and represented 16 percent of total imports.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan 2008
    Business Plan of the Mercator Group and the Company Poslovni Sistem Mercator, d.d., for the Year 2008 Poslovni sistem Mercator, d.d. Management Board December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE YEAR 2008 8 COMPANY PROFILE 9 COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION OF THE Mercator Group 10 OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE 11 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 11 STRATEGIC POLICIES OF THE MERCATOR GROUP 13 VISION 13 MISSION 13 CORPORATE VALUES 13 STRATEGIC POLICIES 14 STRATEGIC GOALS 15 KEY OBJECTIVES AND TASKS IN 2008 16 STARTING POINTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE BUSINESS PLAN 18 MACROECONOMIC STARTING POINTS 18 MICROECONOMIC STARTING POINTS 19 ANALYSIS OF THE MERCATOR GROUP’S MARKET POSITION 20 PLANNED ACTIVITIES OF THE MERCATOR GROUP 29 DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT 29 MARKETING 33 CATEGORY MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLIER RELATIONS 40 SALES AND STORE FORMATS 42 LOGISTICS 45 HUMAN RESOURCES 46 ORGANIZATION AND QUALITY 47 SOCIALLY ACCOUNTABLE ACTION AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ACTIVITIES49 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 52 FINANCIAL OPERATION 54 RELATIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS 55 RISK MANAGEMENT 58 PERFORMANCE OF THE MERCATOR GROUP COMPANIES 61 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 63 FUNDAMENTAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES 63 COMPOSITON OF THE MERCATOR GROUP 63 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE MERCATOR GROUP 64 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY POSLOVNI SISTEM MERCATOR, D.D.74 2 SUMMARY Successful performance in 2007 to be followed by ambitious continuation of internationalization in 2008 In 2008, Mercator Group is planning net revenues from sales in the amount of EUR 2.6 billion, which is 9.5 percent more than the estimated figure for 2007. Of this sum, almost EUR 870 million, or one third, will be generated in four foreign markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercator Group Activities
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 REPORT BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD .......................................... 3 SUPERVISORY BOARD REPORT ...................................................................................... 5 2013 HIGHLIGHTS BY MARKETS ..................................................................................... 8 OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS .............................................................. 9 MERCATOR GROUP PROFILE AND ORGANIZATION ...................................................... 10 MERCATOR GROUP ACTIVITIES ................................................................................... 13 MAJOR EVENTS ........................................................................................................... 15 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT ..................................................................... 17 MERCATOR GROUP BUSINESS STRATEGY .................................................................... 24 BUSINESS REPORT........................................................................................................... 27 SALES AND MARKETING .............................................................................................. 29 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT AND RETAIL NETWORK DEVELOPMENT .......................... 40 EFFECT OF ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND COMPETITION ON MERCATOR GROUP OPERATIONS IN 2013 .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Role in the Western Balkans
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Alida Vračić Turkey’s Role in the Western Balkans RP 11 December 2016 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2016 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They reflect the views of the author(s). SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-200 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 This research and its publi- cation have been enabled by the generous support of Stiftung Mercator, Essen. Table of Contents 5 Issues and Conclusions 7 Turkey’s Comeback in the Balkans 12 Turkey’s Economy and Non-state Actors in the Western Balkans 15 Turkish Military in the Balkans 18 Countries of Particular Interest to Turkey 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 22 Kosovo 24 Macedonia 27 Can Old Animosities Die? Serbia-Turkey Relations 30 Turkey’s Activism as Seen from the Balkans 32 Western Balkans – EU’s Forgotten Post? 33 Outlook 34 Abbreviations Alida Vračić is IPC-Stiftung Mercator Fellow 2015/2016 at SWP Issues and Conclusions Turkey’s Role in the Western Balkans For the past two decades, Turkey has been rediscover- ing the Balkans. The end of the Cold War and the dis- solution of the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s and the subsequent violence were decisive points in Turkish foreign policy. New openings toward southeast Europe and the creation of new states greatly transformed the foreign policy strategies of Turkey, which was aiming for far-reaching political impact.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1-10, 2012)
    EUROPEAN UNION YEREVAN PRESS CLUB INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING ARMENIAN BROADCAST MEDIA AHEAD OF ELECTIONS TO RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY IN 2012 (MARCH 1-10, 2012) This document has been produced within the framework of the project “Empowering Armenian civil society to monitor electoral processes”, implemented by the OSCE Office in Yerevan with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or of the OSCE. PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2012 YEREVAN PRESS CLUB www.ypc.am 2 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2012 CONTENTS INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING ARMENIAN BROADCAST MEDIA AHEAD OF ELECTIONS TO RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY IN 2012 (MARCH 1-10, 2012) 4 GENERAL INFORMATION ON MONITORING 7 MONITORING METHODOLOGY 8 PARTIES INCLUDED IN THE LIST OF MONITORING 11 THE MEDIA STUDIED: BRIEF OVERVIEW 13 TABLES (MARCH 1-10, 2012) 15 3 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2012 INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING ARMENIAN BROADCAST MEDIA AHEAD OF ELECTIONS TO RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY IN 2012 (MARCH 1-10, 2012) Current phase of the monitoring, which has started since March 1, 2012, includes the period preceding the official pre-election promotion. Yerevan Press Club is planning to present interim reports once in every ten days. THE MONITORING included 6 national TV channels - First Channel of the Public Television of Armenia (H1), “Armenia”, “Yerkir Media”, “Kentron”, Second Armenian TV Channel (H2), “Shant”; two Yerevan TV channels - “Shoghakat” (this channel was chosen because it is a part of Public TV and Radio Company and as such has a special mission) and “ArmNews” (which is the only broadcaster in Armenia which has a specific license of a news channel); as well as Public Radio of Armenia.
    [Show full text]