DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case for Space 2015 the Impact of Space on the UK Economy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case for Space 2015 the Impact of Space on the UK Economy FINAL REPORT The Case for Space 2015 The impact of space on the UK economy CASE STUDIES A study for the Satellite Applications Catapult, Innovate UK, UKspace and the UK Space Agency July 2015 About London Economics London Economics (LE) is a leading independent economic consultancy, headquartered in London, with a dedicated team of professional economists specialised in the application of best practice economic and financial analysis to the space sector. As a firm, our reputation for independent analysis and client‐driven, world‐class and academically robust economic research has been built up over 25 years. Drawing on our solid understanding of the economics of space, expertise in economic analysis and best practice industry knowledge, our space team has extensive experience of providing independent analysis and innovative solutions to advise clients in the public, private and third sectors on the economic fundamentals, commercial potential of existing, developing and speculative market opportunities to reduce uncertainty and guide decision‐makers in this most challenging of operating environments. All consultants of our space team are highly‐qualified economists with extensive experience in applying a wide variety of analytical techniques to the space sector, including: Insightful and accurate market analysis and demand forecasting; Analysis of industrial structure, strategy and competitive forces; New technology adoption modelling; Estimation of public utility benefits; Opportunity prioritisation and targeting to maximise exploitation of investment; Sophisticated statistical analysis (econometrics, regression); Economic and financial modelling, including: Cost‐Benefit Analysis (CBA), cost effectiveness analysis, Value for Money (VfM), impact assessment, policy evaluation, business case development, cash flow and sustainability modelling. Head Office: Somerset House, New Wing, Strand, London WC2R 1LA, United Kingdom. w: londoneconomics.co.uk/aerospace e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)20 3701 7700 : @LE_Aerospace Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the useful guidance and feedback provided by the Satellite Applications Catapult, Innovate UK, UKspace and the UK Space Agency throughout this research. We would also like to thank all of the stakeholders consulted for their time and informative responses. Responsibility for the contents of this report remains with London Economics. Authors Greg Sadlier, Associate Director, +44 (0)20 3701 7707, [email protected] Rasmus Flytkjær, Senior Economic Consultant, +44 (0)20 3701 7717, [email protected] Maike Halterbeck, Economic Consultant, +44 (0)20 3701 7724, [email protected] Viktoriya Peycheva, Economic Consultant, +44 (0)20 3701 7719, [email protected] Laura Koch, Economic Analyst, +44 (0)20 3701 7718, [email protected] Wherever possible London Economics uses paper sourced from sustainably managed forests using production processes that meet the EU eco‐label requirements. Copyright © 2015 London Economics. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part of this document may be reproduced without permission. London Economics Ltd is a Limited Company registered in England and Wales with registered number 04083204 and registered offices at Somerset House, New Wing, Strand, London WC2R 1LA. London Economics Ltd's registration number for Value Added Tax in the United Kingdom is GB769529863. Table of Contents Page 1 Case studies of R&D demonstrators 1 2 Case studies of end‐user benefits 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Security, safety & resilience 4 2.3 Game‐changing services 9 2.4 Climate and environmental services 11 2.5 More efficient public sector services 15 2.6 e‐connectivity 19 2.7 Space solutions for smart government 27 3 Case studies of education, exploration and space science 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) education and careers 30 3.3 Space exploration beyond earth orbit 31 3.4 Space science 34 4 Case studies of future prospects 35 4.1 Low‐cost access to space 35 References 37 Index of Case Studies 42 London Economics The Case for Space 2015 i 1 | Case studies of R&D demonstrators 1 Case studies of R&D demonstrators Box 1 TechDemoSat‐1 – a collaborative satellite to demonstrate innovative UK space technologies for scientific and commercial applications TechDemoSat‐1 (TDS‐1), produced by the UK’s Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd (SSTL), is a compact, satellite test‐bed for in‐orbit technologies, and represents collaboration between industry and academia from across the UK. TDS‐1 was based on one of SSTL’s existing satellite designs (the SSTL‐ 150) and was contracted by InnovateUK and part‐funded by SEEDA1, which was involved at the early stage. SSTL claims to control a 40% share of the global small satellite export market and to have 21 2 satellites currently being manufactured. TechDemoSat‐1 in orbit, artists’ illustration At a size of roughly 1 cubic metre, and a mass of 150 kg, TechDemoSat‐1 had a total production cost of less than £10m.3 TDS‐1 was financed in part through a £3.0m funding injection by the Technology Strategy Board (now Innovate UK) and £0.5m from the South East England Development Agency (SEEDA), whilst SSTL provided additional investment of their own for research purposes. The satellite carries 8 external payloads, self‐funded through the respective payload providers, an all‐British collection of universities and commercial organisations which answered SSTL’s invitation to participate in 2009. Launched in July 2014 on a Russian Soyuz rocket (brokered by Commercial Space Technologies ‐ CST), TDS‐1 has been continuously returning payload data since having successfully passed its designated in‐orbit Launch and Early Operations Phase (LEOP) and will continue to do so for the rest of its projected 3 year lifespan. Some of the results from payloads on board TDS‐1 are now being announced4, marking the first point at which each of these payloads start to deliver downstream benefits. Many of the benefits can be directly derived from the performance of the satellite payloads, for example: The Highly Miniaturised Radiation Monitor (HMRM), built by Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, will be commercialised after being tested5, and has been developed for future use on ESA missions. The De‐Orbit Sail, by Cranfield University, attempts to provide proof‐of‐concept for a de‐orbit system for small satellites. CubeSAT ACS, supplied by Satellite Services Ltd, attempts to improve on attitude determination and control subsystems for CubeSats. Further, SSTL claim TDS‐1 will “Inspire, Train and Retain”, with these more intangible benefits coming in the form of scientific inspiration for schools across the UK, the training of students in academia and engineers in industry with data from TDS‐1 payloads, and British engineers being retained to continue working on new developments.6 Finally, the very fact that this mission is a technology demonstrator opens up the possibility for further, follow‐up projects, either demonstrating other technologies, or continuing the legacy that TDS‐1 has started to create. Source: London Economics based on secondary research and stakeholder consultations 1 South East England Development Agency. 2 “Changing the Economics of Space” SSTL, found here: http://www.sstl.co.uk/getdoc/79ada3f1‐76c0‐49f0‐8f21‐ade2c262677c 3 “How they were funded” – SSTL presentation http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2013/all2013/4/ 4 The National Oceanography Centre hosted a one‐day workshop in March 2015 to present the first results for ocean surface wind and waves monitoring with GNSS Reflectrometry on TechDemoSat‐1. http://www.satnews.com/story.php?number=102772070 5 HMRM Future Work, Slide 38, Presentation delivered May 2012 ‐ https://indico.esa.int/indico/event/14/contribution/9/material/slides/0.pdf 6 Slide 7, TechDemoSat‐1 ‐ https://www.stfc.ac.uk/RALSpace/resources/PDF/ASC_Presentation_13.pdf London Economics The Case for Space 2015 1 1 | Case studies of R&D demonstrators Box 2 UKube‐1, the UK Space Agency’s first mission – a technology demonstration ‘CubeSat’ nanosatellite jointly funded by Clyde Space UKube‐1 was the first mission commissioned by the UK Space Agency after its formation in 2010, and is a CubeSat – a satellite comprising one or more 10x10x10 cm blocks (1U). UKube‐1 has dimensions of 30x10x10 cm (3U) and will showcase new technologies for UK industry and academia. The mission was co‐ funded by InnovateUK. Designed and built by Clyde Space of Scotland – themselves a CubeSat success story with over 40% of CubeSat missions using hardware developed by Clyde Space7 – UKube‐1 is envisaged to be the pioneer mission for the UK Space Agency’s CubeSat UKube‐1 in orbit, artists impression programme. The aim for future missions is to establish a development and launch frequency of one CubeSat every 18 months, thus establishing a constant stream of CubeSat production and enabling British engineers to benefit from “hands‐on, real‐time training”.8 UKube‐1 was successfully launched in July 2014 on a Russian Soyuz rocket brokered by London‐based Commercial Space Technologies (CST), and along with the engineering benefits mentioned above, it will increase capabilities for education and commercial activities, with payloads including9,10: TOPCAT – A University of Bath experiment that will use GPS signals to measure weather conditions in space. Janus – Airbus Defence and Space designed this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Foi-R--5077--Se
    Omvärldsanalys Rymd 2020 Fokus på försvar och säkerhet Sandra Lindström (red.), Kristofer Hallgren, Seméli Papadogiannakis, Ola Rasmusson, John Rydqvist och Jonatan Westman FOI-R--5077--SE Januari 2021 Sandra Lindström (red.), Kristofer Hallgren, Seméli Papadogiannakis, Ola Rasmusson, John Rydqvist och Jonatan Westman Omvärldsanalys Rymd 2020 Fokus på försvar och säkerhet FOI-R--5077--SE Titel Omvärldsanalys Rymd 2020 – Fokus på försvar och säkerhet Title Global Space Trends 2020 for Defence and Security Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--5077--SE Månad/Month Januari Utgivningsår/Year 2021 Antal sidor/Pages 127 ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsmakten Forskningsområde Flygsystem och rymdfrågor FoT-område Sensorer och signaturanpassningsteknik Projektnr/Project no E60966 Godkänd av/Approved by Lars Höstbeck Ansvarig avdelning Försvars- och säkerhetssystem Bild/Cover: Tre gröna lasrar från Starfire Optical Range på Kirtland Air Force Base i New Mexico, USA. Anläggningen används bland annat för inmätning av objekt i låga satellitbanor. Den allmänna uppfattningen (men ej officiell) är att lasern även kan användas som ASAT-vapen. Källa: Directed Energy Directorate, US Air Force. Detta verk är skyddat enligt lagen (1960:729) om upphovsrätt till litterära och konstnärliga verk, vilket bl.a. innebär att citering är tillåten i enlighet med vad som anges i 22 § i nämnd lag. För att använda verket på ett sätt som inte medges direkt av svensk lag krävs särskild överenskommelse. This work is protected by the Swedish Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works (1960:729). Citation is permitted in accordance with article 22 in said act. Any form of use that goes beyond what is permitted by Swedish copyright law, requires the written permission of FOI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Race Continues
    The Space Race Continues The Evolution of Space Tourism from Novelty to Opportunity Matthew D. Melville, Vice President Shira Amrany, Consulting and Valuation Analyst HVS GLOBAL HOSPITALITY SERVICES 369 Willis Avenue Mineola, NY 11501 USA Tel: +1 516 248-8828 Fax: +1 516 742-3059 June 2009 NORTH AMERICA - Atlanta | Boston | Boulder | Chicago | Dallas | Denver | Mexico City | Miami | New York | Newport, RI | San Francisco | Toronto | Vancouver | Washington, D.C. | EUROPE - Athens | London | Madrid | Moscow | ASIA - 1 Beijing | Hong Kong | Mumbai | New Delhi | Shanghai | Singapore | SOUTH AMERICA - Buenos Aires | São Paulo | MIDDLE EAST - Dubai HVS Global Hospitality Services The Space Race Continues At a space business forum in June 2008, Dr. George C. Nield, Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), addressed the future of commercial space travel: “There is tangible work underway by a number of companies aiming for space, partly because of their dreams, but primarily because they are confident it can be done by the private sector and it can be done at a profit.” Indeed, private companies and entrepreneurs are currently aiming to make this dream a reality. While the current economic downturn will likely slow industry progress, space tourism, currently in its infancy, is poised to become a significant part of the hospitality industry. Unlike the space race of the 1950s and 1960s between the United States and the former Soviet Union, the current rivalry is not defined on a national level, but by a collection of first-mover entrepreneurs that are working to define the industry and position it for long- term profitability.
    [Show full text]
  • New Executive Director of the European GNSS Agency
    GSA PRESS RELEASE New Executive Director of the European GNSS Agency (GSA – future EUSPA) takes up office. On 16 October 2020, Rodrigo da Costa took up his duties as Executive Director of the European GNSS Agency (GSA, planned soon to become the EU Space Programme Agency). He was elected by the GSA Administrative Board on 15 September 2020 and met with the ITRE Committee of the European Parliament on 12 October 2020. Mr da Costa, a Portuguese national who has worked in a number of EU countries, joined the GSA as the Galileo Services Programme Manager in March 2017. In this position he was responsible for leading Galileo, the EU global navigation satellite system, in its service provision phase. He has previously held several senior project management, business development, and institutional account management positions in space industry, in the areas of human space flight, exploration, launchers and R&D. Mr da Costa will now be working on transforming the GSA into the EU Space Programme Agency (EUSPA). He will ensure that its existing activities continue to be successfully delivered whilst also performing new ones required to undertake with the Agency’s new mandate. Since its creation in 2004 the GSA has made an unparallel contribution to the EU flagship satellite systems Galileo and EGNOS, which has significantly contributed to Union’s independence and economic growth. Staffed with highly skilled and dedicated personnel, the agency has boosted innovation, fostered entrepreneurship, led the provision of services, and stimulated the EU economy, in particular through ensuring Galileo and EGNOS uptake across a wide range of market segments thanks to high-quality and secure satellite services.
    [Show full text]
  • European Space Policy Based on an Historical Perspective of the Involvement of the European Union (EU) in the Field
    European space Historical perspective, specificpolicy aspects and key challenges IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Vincent Reillon Members' Research Service January 2017 — PE 595.917 EN This publication aims to provide an overview of European space policy based on an historical perspective of the involvement of the European Union (EU) in the field. The in-depth analysis focuses on the role played by the different EU institutions and the European Space Agency in defining and implementing a space policy in Europe and the current issues and challenges. PE 595.917 ISBN 978-92-846-0552-1 doi:10.2861/903178 QA-04-17-069-EN-N Original manuscript, in English, completed in January 2017. Disclaimer The content of this document is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. © European Union, 2017. Photo credits: © Atlantis / Fotolia. [email protected] http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet) http://epthinktank.eu (blog) European space policy Page 1 of 35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the 1950s, development of the space sector in Europe was limited to investments made by individual Member States (France, Italy, the United Kingdom). The failure of the first European partnerships in space activities in the 1960s led to the establishment of the European Space Agency (ESA), an intergovernmental institution, in 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Sservi Annual Report
    SSERVI ANNUAL REPORT YEAR TWO Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................3 SSERVI Central Report ....................................................................................................................................6 Volatiles Regolith & Thermal Investigations Consortium for Exploration and Science (VORTICES) .........17 SSERVI Evolution and Environment of Exploration Destinations (SEEED) ................................................25 Center for Lunar Science and Exploration (CLSE) ........................................................................................36 Institute for Modeling Plasma, Atmospheres and Cosmic Dust (IMPACT) ...................................................45 Remote, In Situ, and Synchrotron Studies for Science and Exploration (RIS4E) ...........................................54 Field Investigations to Enable Solar System Science and Exploration (FINESSE) .......................................62 Dynamic Response of Environments at Asteroids, the Moon, and Moons of Mars (DREAM2) ...................70 Center for Lunar and Asteroid Surface Science (CLASS) ..............................................................................86 Institute for the Science of Exploration Targets (ISET) ................................................................................102 International Partners ....................................................................................................................................110
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 22Nd Meeting of the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Advisory Board
    NATIONAL SPACE-BASED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION, AND TIMING ADVISORY BOARD Twenty-Second Meeting December 5-6, 2018 Crown Plaza Redondo Beach 300 N. Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 John Stenbit James J. Miller Chair Executive Director November 5-6, 2018 Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach Peninsula/Pacific Rooms 300 N. Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Agenda Jump to Session: Dec 5 | Dec 6 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2018 9:00 - 9:05 BOARD CONVENES Call to Order & Announcements Mr. James J. Miller, Executive Director, PNT Advisory Board, NASA Headquarters 9:05 - 9:20 Opening Comments: 22nd PNTAB Focus, Priorities & Recent Products: (1) GPS Topics Paper. (2) Spectrum Memorandum Mr. John Stenbit, Chair, Dr. Bradford Parkinson, 1st Vice-Chair 9:20 - 9:45 GPS Program Status & Modernization Milestones VIEW PDF (3 MB) Col John Claxton, Deputy Director, GPS-D, Space & Missile Systems Center (SMC) 9:45 - 10:10 PNT Efforts by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) National Risk Management Center VIEW PDF (446 KB) Mr. James (Jim) Platt, Director, PNT Office, Department of Homeland Security 10:10 - 10:35 2 Real-World Receiver Testing and the 1dB Criteria Impacts VIEW PDF (1 MB) Mr. Guy Buesnel, PNT Security Technologist, Spirent Communications 10:35 - 10:50 BREAK 10:50 - 11:15 Securing GPS-based Systems against Signal-in-Space Threats VIEW PDF (2 MB) Mr. Jeremy Warriner, Director of Government Systems, Microsemi 11:15 - 11:40 European Efforts to Protect, Toughen and Augment GNSS Maintaining RNSS as a Critical International Resource VIEW PDF (1 MB) Mr. Dominic Hayes, Spectrum Management and Policy for Galileo, European Commission 11:40 - 12:05 Alternative PNT in Europe VIEW PDF (1 MB) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo Program & European GNSS Agency
    Automatic Emergency Call Systems Navigation module and GNSS Fiammetta Diani (European GNSS Agency) Sanna Kuukka (European Commission, DG ENTR) Galileo program & European GNSS Agency Political oversight Council and European Parliament Programme management European GNSS Programme Committee EuropeanEuropean Independent CommissionCommission advisors Execution Delegation Assistance and delegation European Space Agency European GNSS Agency Security centre (GSMC) IOV Contracts Upstream Downstream Security accreditation (space) (applications) industry industry Market Development FOC Contracts Applications R&D Operations and service provision Why GNSS for Automatic Emergency Call Systems ? In outdoor environments satellite navigation systems are today and will continue to be in the future the most efficient (= cost effective) and accurate way to calculate the position. In fact, both Russia ERA-Glonass and European Union eCall require satellite navigation. GNSS can be complemented with other sensors or network based techniques, but the public owned and free of charge GNSS signals are the core of location services. GNSS for emergency caller location goes beyond In Vehicles Systems In the United States 911 emergency caller location, handset techniques typically use GNSS that is considered by many operators the best methods in outdoor situations. European Emergency Services and industry representatives require the use of GNSS: during the European Emergency Number Association Conference in April 2014, 94.2% of respondents indicated that GNSS data from mobile devices should be used for locating callers. Why multiple GNSS? When buildings block the signal and reduce the number of visible satellites, the availability of more constellations ensures a much more accurate final position Having more satellites in view has beneficial effect on reducing the time to the first fix The robustness of the position is improved, and even if a satellite or constellation are not available or providing incorrect data, a reasonable accuracy will continue to provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting the Sustainable Development Goals
    UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS European Global Navigation Satellite System and Copernicus: Supporting the Sustainable Development Goals BUILDING BLOCKS TOWARDS THE 2030 AGENDA UNITED NATIONS Cover photo: ©ESA/ATG medialab. Adapted by the European GNSS Agency, contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2017), processed by ESA, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA European Global Navigation Satellite System and Copernicus: Supporting the Sustainable Development Goals BUILDING BLOCKS TOWARDS THE 2030 AGENDA UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2018 ST/SPACE/71 © United Nations, January 2018. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concern- ing the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present pub- lication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issue. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Foreword by the Director of the Office for Outer Space Affairs The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development came into effect on 1 January 2016. The Agenda is anchored around 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which set the targets to be fulfilled by all governments by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • ESPI Insights Space Sector Watch
    ESPI Insights Space Sector Watch Issue 16 May 2021 THIS MONTH IN THE SPACE SECTOR… MARS LANDING CEMENTS CHINA’S POSITION AS MAJOR SPACE POWER ................................................................ 1 POLICY & PROGRAMMES .................................................................................................................................... 2 ESA awards €150 million in contracts to continue development of Prometheus and Phoebus .......... 2 European Commission targets second study for its space-based secure connectivity project .......... 2 South Korea joins Artemis accords and strengthens partnership with the U.S. ..................................... 2 May marks busy month in UK space sector................................................................................................... 3 NASA temporarily suspends SpaceX’s HLS contract following protests on the award ........................ 3 Spain eyes creation of a National Space Agency .......................................................................................... 3 Space Force awards $228 million GPS contract extension to Raytheon Intelligence and Space ...... 4 China officially establishes company to develop and operate broadband mega constellation ........... 4 Lithuania signs Association Agreement with ESA ........................................................................................ 4 CNES and Bundeswehr University Munich (UniBw) launch SpaceFounders accelerator ..................... 4 The Brazilian Space Agency selects Virgin Orbit
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Lunar Science Drivers for Lunar Mission One*
    Preliminary Lunar Science Drivers for Lunar Mission One* (*Contributors are listed at the end of the document) 1. Introduction This document describes the top-level science drivers for Lunar Mission One (as envisaged in December 2014). It should be viewed as a ‘living document’ that will be revised in the light of further studies to be conducted after the Kickstarter funding phase. The science goals will be prioritized, and instruments selected, as the mission becomes better defined. 2. Landing site and science planning assumptions It is assumed that a south polar site will be selected in an area of long-duration sunlight - a few hundred days with eclipse durations of less than 50-70 hours. The specific landing locality will be defined after a full study of potential landing sites based on work already performed for previous mission studies (e.g. ESA’s proposed Lunar Lander [1]). All the proposed landing sites (e.g. Shackleton crater and Mons Malapert) lie on, or just within, the rim of the giant South Pole-Aitken (SPA) impact basin [2]. Scientifically, these south polar locations are of interest because the local regoliths may contain fragments of SPA impact melt (which could in principle be used to date the basin, a key event in lunar geological history), and fragments of lower crustal and/or mantle materials excavated by the basin. In addition, the detection and characterization of volatiles that may be retained in these cold polar regoliths is of both scientific, and possibly (in the longer term) practical, interest. To a first approximation, the near-surface environment of potential polar landing sites are likely to be similar, with several metres of unconsolidated regolith, probably containing blocks of more competent materials, overlying more compacted highland ‘mega-regolith’.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrobotic: Commercial Service for Lunar Resource Payload Delivery
    Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (2015) 2066.pdf ASTROBOTIC: COMMERCIAL SERVICE FOR LUNAR RESOURCE PAYLOAD DELIVERY. J. Thornton1, S. Huber2, K. Peterson3, D. Hendrickson4, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Astrobotic Technology, Inc. (2515 Liberty Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222). ing resource instruments on mul- Introduction: This paper describes how Astrobot- ti-customer missions to the Moon, ic’s commercial lunar delivery service is enabling ac- resource development investiga- cess to the Moon for activities such as lunar resource tions can be launched and iterated development payloads. Topics addressed here include at multiple sites on the lunar sur- current impediments to lunar resource development, face. Small instruments can be commercial approaches to delivering resource devel- sent to numerous destinations, on opment payloads to the Moon, and traction already many small rovers. This ap- seen with the commercial market for payload delivery. proach allows resource payloads Impediments to Lunar Resource Development: Figure 1: Astro- to fly without complicated and The prospect of utilizing lunar resources for future botic’s lunar tenuous bilateral space agency space exploration is promising, and could reduce the payload delivery partnerships. Multi-user commer- cost of missions beyond Earth orbit by a factor of four. model is an end- cial missions can also provide [1] Realizing these savings however, requires first the to-end commer- important precursor feasibility determination of lunar resource availability, and the cial delivery ser- assessments of resource develop- demonstration of resource extraction, refinement, and vice ideal for ment without a major financial utilization. The prior high-cost of robotic missions to lunar resource- commitment by one or more the Moon has placed an extraordinary barrier to these focused pay- space agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging Commercial Confidence
    SPACEPORT UK: AHEAD FORGING WITH COMMERCIAL CONFIDENCE Copyright © Satellite Applications Catapult Ltd 2014. SPACEPORT UK: FORGING AHEAD WITH COMMERCIAL CONFIDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 07 2 DEMAND FORECAST 11 • Commercial human spaceflight • Very high speed point to point travel • Satellite deployment • Microgravity research • Other commercial demand 3 SPACEPORT FACILITIES 47 • Core infrastructure required • Spaceflight preparation and training • Tours/visitor centre • Space campus • Key findings 4 WIDER ECONOMIC IMPACT 57 • Summary • Site development • Employment • Tourism • R&D/education • Key findings 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 67 • Unlocking commercial potential 6 RISKS 73 • Accidents • Single operator • Local opposition 7 FINANCING 77 • Existing scenario • Potential funding sources • Other sources of funds • Insurance • Key findings Appendices 85 • Appendix A • Appendix B Acknowledgements and contact information 89 5 Spaceport UK: A pillar of growth for the UK and European space industry, enabling lower cost access to space, and creating economic benefit far beyond its perimeter fence. A spaceport will unlock economic growth and jobs in existing UK industries and regions, while positioning the UK to take advantage of emerging demand for commercial human spaceflight, small satellite launch, microgravity research, parabolic flights, near-space balloon tourism, and eventually high-speed point-to-point travel. Without a specific site selected and looking at the economic impact of a spaceport generically, this report expects the spaceport to deliver approximately £2.5bn and 8,000 jobs to the broader UK economy over 10 years. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Executive Summary Our plan is for Britain to have a fully functional, operating spaceport “by 2018. This would serve as a European focal point for the pioneers of commercial spaceflight using the potential of spaceflight experience companies like Virgin Galactic, XCOR and Swiss S3 to pave the way for satellite launch services to follow.
    [Show full text]