Evaluation of an Integrative Strategy in Forests: Does Deadwood Enrichment Work and Increase Biodiversity?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of an Integrative Strategy in Forests: Does Deadwood Enrichment Work and Increase Biodiversity? Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt Lehrstuhl für Terrestrische Ökologie Evaluation of an integrative strategy in forests: does deadwood enrichment work and increase biodiversity? Inken Susanne Dörfler Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Hans Pretzsch Prüfende/-r der Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang W. Weisser 2. Prof. Dr. Jörg Müller (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) 3. Prof. Dr. Heike Feldhaar (Universität Bayreuth) Die Dissertation wurde am 22.08.2017 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 25.10.2017 angenommen. It all came together then, you see—all the various isolated bits—and made a coherent pattern. Miss Marple, Agatha Christie 1950, A murder is announced Acknowledgements I want to express my gratitude towards my supervisor Prof. Wolfgang W. Weisser who enabled the project for me, even in difficult times. I also want to thank Martin M. Gossner, Jörg Müller and Sebastian Seibold who did a great job in supporting me and answering many questions. I found many great colleagues - today also friends, at the Chair of Terrestrial Ecology, which was the best thing that could happen: Thanks for all the coffee breaks, the expired beer and all those conversations. Especially Brigitte Grimm is a treasure, making many things possible that I thought to be lost. However, also outside of our chair many people offered help that was priceless. This included Markus Blaschke and Heinz Bussler who did a great job as experts. It also includes the whole staff in the forestry department Ebrach, especially Uli Mergner with his great commitment towards sustainable forestry and its scientific evaluation. Besides that, there were a lot of people who have done so many things that may seem small in detail but that were invaluable for accomplishing the project. This includes, the wonderful people from the field station in Fabrikschleichach, from the Bavarian Forest National Park and from the University of Toronto Scarborough, especially Marc Cadotte and possibly many more whom I’ve unfortunately missed to mention. This project was funded by the Bavarian Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry (Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten). I want to expresses my gratitude to the advisory board of this project, especially Reinhardt Neft, MR Dr. Stefan Nüßlein, MR Günter Biermayer, Florian Zormaier and Erich Leihs, who were willing to let us realize this project. Content Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................... v Summary .................................................................................................................................. vii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Global threats to biodiversity ........................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Conservation agreements in Germany ...................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Improvement of current conservation actions ........................................................... 2 1.2 Biodiversity and threat of saproxylic species ................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Properties of saproxylics’ habitat .............................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Influences of forest management on saproxylics’ habitat and their biodiversity ...... 5 1.3 Integrative management for deadwood enrichment ......................................................... 7 1.3.1 Passive approaches .................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Active approaches ..................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Integrative conservation in German beech forests ......................................................... 11 1.5 Single chapters of the manuscript .................................................................................. 14 A) Evaluation of the changes in deadwood amounts and their drivers ............................ 14 B) Description of biodiversity before and after the implementation of the strategy ........ 15 C) Relation between changes in biodiversity and deadwood enrichment ........................ 16 D) Relationship of assembly mechanisms and deadwood enrichment ............................ 17 1.6 Specific aims and Questions .......................................................................................... 18 2. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 21 2.1 Research Area ................................................................................................................ 21 2.1.1 Climate and soil conditions ..................................................................................... 21 2.1.2 Bavarian state forest company and department Ebrach .......................................... 23 2.2 Data ................................................................................................................................ 24 2.2.1 Regular forest inventory .......................................................................................... 25 2.2.2 Additional forest inventory ..................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 Species records ........................................................................................................ 30 2.3 Statistics ......................................................................................................................... 32 2.3.1 General statistics ..................................................................................................... 32 2.3.2 Chapter A) Evaluation of the changes in deadwood amounts and their drivers ..... 32 i 2.3.3 Chapter B) Description of biodiversity before and after the implementation of the strategy ............................................................................................................................. 34 2.3.4 Chapter C) Relation between changes in biodiversity and deadwood enrichment ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.3.5 Chapter D) Relationship of assembly mechanisms and deadwood enrichment ...... 36 3. Results .................................................................................................................................. 41 3.1 Chapter A) Evaluation of the changes in deadwood amounts and their drivers ............ 41 3.1.1 Description of deadwood amounts before and after the implementation of the deadwood enrichment strategy ......................................................................................... 41 3.1.2 Deadwood amounts in different areas ..................................................................... 41 3.1.3 Living stand parameters before and after the implementation of the deadwood enrichment strategy .......................................................................................................... 44 3.1.4 Change in Deadwood profile ................................................................................... 51 3.1.5 Habitat trees ............................................................................................................. 52 3.2 Chapter B) Description of biodiversity before and after the implementation of the strategy ................................................................................................................................. 53 3.2.1 Beetles ..................................................................................................................... 53 3.2.2 Fungi ........................................................................................................................ 54 3.2.3 Birds ........................................................................................................................ 55 3.2.4 Plants ....................................................................................................................... 55 3.2.5 True bugs ................................................................................................................. 55 3.2.6 Multidiversity index ................................................................................................ 56 3.3 Chapter C) Relation between changes in biodiversity and deadwood enrichment ........ 59 3.3.1 Environmental variables .......................................................................................... 59 3.3.2 Drivers of biodiversity change ................................................................................ 59 3.4 Chapter D) Relationship of assembly mechanisms and deadwood enrichment ............. 63 3.4.1 Description and phylogenetic signal of traits .......................................................... 63 3.4.2 Optimal a-value ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Coleópteros Saproxílicos De Los Bosques De Montaña En El Norte De La Comunidad De Madrid
    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Coleópteros Saproxílicos de los Bosques de Montaña en el Norte de la Comunidad de Madrid T e s i s D o c t o r a l Juan Jesús de la Rosa Maldonado Licenciado en Ciencias Ambientales 2014 Departamento de Producción Vegetal: Botánica y Protección Vegetal Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Coleópteros Saproxílicos de los Bosques de Montaña en el Norte de la Comunidad de Madrid Juan Jesús de la Rosa Maldonado Licenciado en Ciencias Ambientales Directores: D. Pedro del Estal Padillo, Doctor Ingeniero Agrónomo D. Marcos Méndez Iglesias, Doctor en Biología 2014 Tribunal nombrado por el Magfco. y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid el día de de 2014. Presidente D. Vocal D. Vocal D. Vocal D. Secretario D. Suplente D. Suplente D. Realizada la lectura y defensa de la Tesis el día de de 2014 en Madrid, en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos. Calificación: El Presidente Los Vocales El Secretario AGRADECIMIENTOS A Ángel Quirós, Diego Marín Armijos, Isabel López, Marga López, José Luis Gómez Grande, María José Morales, Alba López, Jorge Martínez Huelves, Miguel Corra, Adriana García, Natalia Rojas, Rafa Castro, Ana Busto, Enrique Gorroño y resto de amigos que puntualmente colaboraron en los trabajos de campo o de gabinete. A la Guardería Forestal de la comarca de Buitrago de Lozoya, por su permanente apoyo logístico. A los especialistas en taxonomía que participaron en la identificación del material recolectado, pues sin su asistencia hubiera sido mucho más difícil finalizar este trabajo.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition of Coleoptera Families Associated with Live and Dead Wood in a Large Norway Spruce Plantation in Denmark
    Species composition of Coleoptera families associated with live and dead wood in a large Norway spruce plantation in Denmark Jens Reddersen & Thomas Secher Jensen Reddersen, J. & T.S. Jensen: Species composition of Coleoptera familites as­ sociated with live og dead wood in a large Norway spruce plantation in Den­ mark. Ent. Meddr. 71: 115-128: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2003. ISSN 0013-8851. For decades, the idea of various biotope types hosting unique plant and ani­ mal species associations and thus forming well-delimited species communities have continuously been debated. At any rate, it remains a practical empirical working concept in intensively exploited mosaic landscapes like in Denmark where biotope fragments are distinctly separated by man-made borders. In Denmark, conifer plantations dominated by Norway spruce, Picea abies L. con­ stitute such a well-delimited biotope type - at the same time widely distributed and with an insect fauna only poorly known. In two years, 1980-81, in Gludsted Plantation, Central Jutland, the arthro­ pod fauna was studied in six stands of mature well-tended Norway spruce on poor sandy acidic soils. A variety of sampling methods was employed with a minimum of four white bucket traps and two tray traps on the ground in each stand. In both years in some stands, ground emergence traps were set up as well as vertical series of white buckets in canopies at mean levels 6.6, 10.6 and 13.2 m. Additional sampling comprised vertical sticky trap series in canopies, sweep net sampling in low branches and winter bark search. Ground beetles, sawflies and the aphid-aphidophagous fauna were analysed in previous papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ploštice (Heteroptera) Chráněné Krajinné Oblasti Kokořínsko True Bugs (Heteroptera) of Kokořínsko Protected Landscape Area
    Bohemia centralis, Praha, 27: 267–294, 2006 Ploštice (Heteroptera) Chráněné krajinné oblasti Kokořínsko True bugs (Heteroptera) of Kokořínsko Protected Landscape Area Josef Bryja1, 2 a Petr Kment 3, 4 1 Oddělení populační biologie, Ústav biologie obratlovců AV ČR, CZ - 675 02 Studenec 122, Česká republika; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Ústav botaniky a zoologie, Přírodovědecká fakulta MU, Kotlářská 2, CZ - 611 37 Brno, Česká republika 3 Entomologické oddělení, Národní muzeum, Kunratice 1, CZ - 148 00 Praha, Česká republika; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Katedra zoologie, Přírodovědecká fakulta UK, Viničná 7, CZ - 128 44 Praha, Česká republika ▒ Abstract. Faunistic research of true bugs (Heteroptera) in the Kokořínsko Protected Landsape Area (PLA) received only little attention in the past (data on only 22 species were published). Here, we summarize both published and comprehensive recent faunistic data on the true bugs occurring in the PLA. The heteropteran fauna of the PLA Kokořínsko now comprises 305 species (35.6% of species occurring in the Czech Republic) and is characterized by the occurrence of rare species living in well preserved xerothermic or wetland habitats. The observed species richness is slightly higher than that of similarly studied protected areas in the Czech Republic. Twenty one species (6.9% of recorded species richness) is included in the Redlist of the Czech Heteroptera and those species prefer habitats already protected in natural reserves. ▒ Key words: faunistics, Heteroptera, Czech Republic, Bohemia, true bugs, nature conservation 267 BOHEMIA CENTRALIS 27 Úvod a historie výzkumu Přestože více či méně systematický faunistický výzkum ploštic v Čechách započal už v 70.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species and New Records of Click Beetles from the Palearctic Region (Coleoptera, Elateridae)
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 48 (30/06/2011): 47‒60. NEW SPECIES AND NEW RECORDS OF CLICK BEETLES FROM THE PALEARCTIC REGION (COLEOPTERA, ELATERIDAE) Giuseppe Platia Via Molino Vecchio, 21/a, 47043 Gatteo (FC), Italia – [email protected] Abstract: Fourteen new species of click beetles belonging to the genera Cardiophorus (Turkey), Dicronychus (Syria), Dima (Greece), Hemicrepidius (Azerbaijan), Athous (Orthathous) (Azerbaijan), Agriotes (Lebanon), Ampedus (Sardinia, It- aly), Ctenicera (Slovenia), Anostirus (Azerbaijan), Selatosomus (Warchalowskia) (Turkey), Adrastus (Azerbaijan) and Melanotus (Lebanon) are described. New chorological data for fifty-one species from the Palaearctic region are given. Key words: Coleoptera, Elateridae, new species, new records, Palaearctic region. Nuevas species y registros de elatéridos paleárticos (Coleoptera, Elateridae) Resumen: Se describen catorce nuevas especies de elatéridos de los géneros Cardiophorus (Turquía), Dicronychus (Siria), Dima (Grecia), Hemicrepidius (Azerbayán), Athous (Orthathous) (Azerbayán), Agriotes (Líbano), Ampedus (Cerdeña, Italia), Ctenicera (Eslovenia), Anostirus (Azerbayán), Selatosomus (Warchalowskia) (Turquía), Adrastus (Azerbayán) and Melanotus (Líbano). Se aportan además cincuenta y una nuevas citas de la región Paleártica. Palabras clave: Coleoptera, Elateridae, especies nuevas, cita nueva, región Paleártica. Taxonomy / Taxonomía: Adrastus azerbaijanicus n. sp. Athous (Orthathous) lasoni n. sp. Hemicrepidius kroliki n. sp. Agriotes kairouzi
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Caenorhabditis monodelphis sp. n.: defining 1 the stem morphology 2 and genomics of the genus Caenorhabditis Citation for published version: Slos, D, Sudhaus, W, Stevens, L, Bert, W & Blaxter, M 2017, 'Caenorhabditis monodelphis sp. n.: defining 1 the stem morphology 2 and genomics of the genus Caenorhabditis' BMC Zoology, vol 2, no. 24. DOI: 10.1186/s40850-017-0013-2, 10.5281/zenodo.160693 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1186/s40850-017-0013-2 10.5281/zenodo.160693 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: BMC Zoology General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Apr. 2017 Slos et al. BMC Zoology (2017) 2:4 DOI 10.1186/s40850-017-0013-2 BMC Zoology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Caenorhabditis monodelphis sp. n.: defining the stem morphology and genomics of the genus Caenorhabditis Dieter Slos1* , Walter Sudhaus2, Lewis Stevens3*, Wim Bert1 and Mark Blaxter3 Abstract Background: The genus Caenorhabditis has been central to our understanding of metazoan biology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
    A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Study of the Subfamily Anthonominae from Japan (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
    九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository Taxonomic Study of the Subfamily Anthonominae from Japan (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) Kojima, Hiroaki Entomological Laboratory. Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University Morimoto, Katsura Entomological Laboratory. Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University http://hdl.handle.net/2324/2573 出版情報:ESAKIA. 34, pp.147-186, 1994-03-24. Hikosan Biological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University バージョン: 権利関係: ESAKIA, (34): 147-186. March 31,1994 147 Taxonomic Study of the Subfamily Anthonominae from Japan (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)l) Hiroaki KOJIMA and Katsura MORIMOTO Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812 Japan Abstract. Taxonomic study of the subfamily Anthonominae in Japan deals with 20 species in the genera Atzfhonomus and Bradybum including 8 new species. These new species are Anthonomus alni, A. miyakawai, A. uenoi, A. tyukyuensis, A. lakahashii, A. mali, A. minor and A. okinawanus. Anthonomus undulatus Gyllenhal is recorded from Japan for the first time. Keys to genera and species, diagnosis of each species, habitus photographs and line illustrations of important features are provided. Weevils of the genera Anthonomus and Brachyonyx were first grouped together into the “Tribus Anthonomina” by Thomson (1859) and the European species were monographed by Des- brothers (1868) including the genus Bradybafus. This delimitation to the tribe Anthonomini has been accepted thereafter by Reitter (1912,16), Hoffmann (1954), Dieckmann (1968), Smrecynski (1972) and many others. This taxon was upgraded to the subfamily rank by Schenkling & Marshall (1934), Morimoto (1962) and Burke (1976). Another definition to the tribe Anthonomini was given by Lacordaire (1863), who divided the “Tribus Anthonomides” into “Anthonomides vrais” and “Orchestides”. This system was followed by Leconte & Horn (1876).
    [Show full text]
  • Familia Miridae (Insecta: Heteroptera) En La Península Ibérica, Islas Baleares E Islas Canarias (Edición 2018)
    Edición Electrónica DFI-0008 Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Miridae (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2018). Marta Goula, Marcos Roca-Cusachs, Fernando Prieto Piloña & Javier Pérez Valcárcel 31-12-2018 Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 8. Edición electrónica. ISSN: 2445-4133 Documentos Fauna Ibérica. Edición electrónica http://www.faunaiberica.es/publicaciones/dfi/dfi-0008.pdf Proyecto Fauna Ibérica Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). Madrid Editores: Autores: Mª Ángeles Ramos Sánchez Marta Goula Manuel Sánchez Ruiz Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA) i IRBIo, Facultat de Biologia. Universitat de Barcelona. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC. Madrid. Av. Diagonal 643. E-08028 Barcelona. [email protected] Marcos Roca-Cusachs Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Facultat de Biologia. Universitat de Barcelona. Av. Diagonal 643. E-08028 Barcelona. [email protected] Fernando Prieto Piloña [email protected] Javier Pérez Valcárcel [email protected] Forma de citar el trabajo: Goula, M.; Roca-Cusachs, M.; Prieto Piloña, F. & Pérez Valcárcel, J. 2018. Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Miridae (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2018). En: Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 8. Ramos, M.A. & Sánchez Ruiz, M. (Eds.). Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC. Madrid: [2] + 35 pp. Edición electrónica ISSN 2445-4133 Fecha 31/12/2018 Con licencia Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - NoComercial - CompartirIgual (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Cultural Tactics Into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests1
    DA United States US Department of Proceedings --z:;;-;;; Agriculture Forest Service Integrating Cultural Tactics into Northeastern Forest Experiment Station the Management of Bark Beetle General Technical Report NE-236 and Reforestation Pests Edited by: Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team J.C. Gregoire A.M. Liebhold F.M. Stephen K.R. Day S.M.Salom Vallombrosa, Italy September 1-3, 1996 Most of the papers in this publication were submitted electronically and were edited to achieve a uniform format and type face. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. Some participants did not submit papers so they have not been included. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Remarks about pesticides appear in some technical papers contained in these proceedings. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by State and Federal Law. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife - if they are not handled and applied properly.
    [Show full text]