Cannabis and Psychosis: Getting Harder to Argue Against Causation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cannabis and Psychosis: Getting Harder to Argue Against Causation IN THIS ISSUE…… Heart Attack Tied to Edible Marijuana is a Warning to Doctors THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE MINNESOTA DRE MARCH 2019 What is Benzedrex, and How is it Abused CANNABIS AND PSYCHOSIS: GETTING HARDER TO ARGUE AGAINST CAUSATION Medical Application of Case-control study adds to mounting evidence Cannabis in Minnesota – The Basics – People who used cannabis every day were at higher risk of developing a first psychotic episode versus people who never used cannabis, in a case-control study conducted in Use of Cocaine and Europe and Brazil. Compared with non-users, daily cannabis users had more than a three-fold higher odds Marijuana May for incident psychosis (adjusted odds ratio 3.2, 95% CI 2.2-4.1), reported Marta Di Contribute to Young Forti, PhD, of the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience at King's Adults’ Stroke Risk College London, and colleagues. Daily users in cities with relatively wide- Appellate Court spread availability of high-potency cannabis, Affirms ARIDE defined as a tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration ≥10%, saw an even higher Officer Being Qualified chance for psychosis versus non-users as an Expert they stated in Lancet Psychiatry. However, one notable study limitation was the lack of E.R. Visits for data on cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations Nonmedical in the cannabis used by these patients. Also, Prescription Drug Use cannabis use in general was self-reported, and not validated by measures like blood or urine samples. The cutoff between high and low potency (10% THC) was rather conservative, the authors noted. Kratom-Related Calls Despite the researchers "assuming causality" many times throughout their study, "does to Poison Control this mean we can now be sure that (daily and high potency) cannabis use causes Centers on the Rise psychosis? Unfortunately, not all the evidence utilizing different methods is consistent about causality," said Suzanne Gage, PhD, of the University of Liverpool in England, Man Charged With in an accompanying commentary. "Di Forti and colleagues' study asks participants about their cannabis use prior to their Manufacturing first episode psychosis diagnosis, but it is possible that subclinical symptoms might Psychedelic Drug have existed prior to cannabis initiation, meaning that associations in the opposite direction cannot be ruled out," she wrote. It is "perfectly possible" the relationship is Benzodiazepine Misuse bidirectional, Gage added, "as suggested by other work using genetic variables as Among Adults proxies for the exposures of interest in a Mendelian randomization design. Increasing Continued on Page 3 MARCH 2019 Page 2 HEART ATTACK TIED TO WHAT IS BENZEDREX, AND EDIBLE MARIJUANA IS A HOW IS IT ABUSED? WARNING TO DOCTORS Benzedrex intranasal inhalers are nonprescription decongestants. The generic name for the drug is As medical and recreational marijuana becomes legal in propylhexedrine. These inhalers are sold over the counter more and more places, experts worry there isn’t enough to alleviate nasal congestion. science on the risks and benefits of the drug, especially Benzedrex intranasal inhalers are meant to temporarily for patients with heart disease. treat nasal congestion that can occur as a result of allergies In a new case report, doctors describe the heart attack of or colds. Amphetamine sulfate was once the active a man who ate a lollipop laced with high levels of THC, ingredient used in Benzedrex inhalers; however, marijuana’s psychoactive ingredient. This patient’s amphetamines are commonly abused and high doses can story may serve as a warning that cannabis isn’t as be dangerous. In 1949, amphetamine in the inhalers was benign as some would like to think, doctors write in the replaced with propylhexedrine. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Propylhexedrine is a stimulant. The drug causes a release The 70-year-old Canadian man, who had preexisting of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin from cells. heart disease, suffered a heart attack half an hour after Its stimulant effects are similar to the fight-or-flight consuming most of a lollipop that contained 90 mg of response that occurs in people and animals when they are THC. The man had hoped it would help with arthritis stressed, including vasoconstriction (tightening of the pain and sleep. The dose in the lollipop was far greater arterial walls), increased heart rate, increased blood than what people typically inhale with a single marijuana pressure, dilation of the airways, and increased blood joint (7 mg), the researchers note. sugar levels. The vasoconstriction the drug causes is “With access to marijuana legal now in Canada, it’s responsible for its effectiveness as a nasal decongestant. going to be accessible to a larger proportion of the Propylhexedrine is banned in competition by the World population and it’s more likely that some of them will Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). This means that athletes have heart disease,” said study coauthor Dr. Rob are forbidden from using this drug during any Stevenson, a cardiologist at the New Brunswick Heart competitions in organizations that have accepted Center in St. John, New Brunswick. “This could be the WADA’s code. canary in the coal mine.” The man already had been diagnosed with Propylhexedrine Abuse atherosclerosis and had bypass surgery, but he was According to one study, individuals who abuse the drug taking medications to treat the condition, and his disease generally do not do so by using the nasal inhaler properly. was “stable” at the time he consumed the edible Rather, they ingest the medication orally or inject it into cannabis, said lead study author Dr. Alex Saunders, chief their veins. resident of the internal medicine program at the St. Propylhexedrine abuse has been blamed for several health John’s site for Dalhousie University. “After his bypass problems and even sudden death. So why do people abuse surgery he had no repeats of chest pain other than this it? Some people may be trying to get high legally, and one,” Saunders said. some may be trying to improve their concentration and The man had smoked marijuana in his youth and had productivity. However, propylhexedrine abusers report fond memories of it, Saunders said. But once the effects that it does not actually make them more productive of the high-dose THC in the lollipop started to hit, the man’s blood pressure and heart rate quickly shot up. “He The Effects of Benzedrex Abuse described fearful hallucinations,” Saunders said “He was When taken as instructed, Benzedrex is generally not a very afraid he was going to die.” dangerous drug. Some individuals may experience side By the time family members got to him, “he was not only effects, such as burning nasal passages, dryness, rebound having hallucinations, but also intense chest pain,” nasal congestion, sweating, tremors, anxiousness, and/or Saunders said, adding that the terror the man restlessness. Widespread effects are more frequent in experienced may have been too much for his heart. individuals who have heart disease and/or who use propylhexedrine excessively. Continued on Page 5 Continued on Page 3 MARCH 2019 Page 3 CANNABIS AND PSYCHOSIS Continued from page 1 The current analysis included data on 901 adults (ages 18 to 64) with first-episode psychosis diagnosed with ICD-10 criteria at a mental health service. These patients came from across 11 different sites in Brazil and Europe, including the Netherlands, the U.K., France, Spain, and Italy. They were compared with over 1,200 psychosis-free controls from the same sites. People with first-episode psychosis tended to be younger, male, an ethnic minority, and less educated than controls. Some 65% of cases reported any lifetime use of cannabis compared with 46% of controls. Via the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire, participants reported six measures of cannabis use, which included lifetime use, current use, age of first use, lifetime frequency, and weekly money spent on cannabis. Those who spent at least €20 per week (around $23) on cannabis also had higher odds of psychosis (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.8, P<0.0001), as well as those who first used cannabis before they were age 16 years (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, P=0.01). Di Forti and colleagues wanted to determine whether cannabis potency had any relationship with psychosis risk, but they did not have direct data from the cannabis products that participants reported using. The city of residence was used as a proxy instead, based on published reports about the availability of high-potency cannabis by city. Those reports indicated that THC content varied widely: up to 70% in Amsterdam versus less than 10% in Italy, Spain, and France, where weaker herbal types of marijuana were typical. On the basis of these data, the researchers estimated that if only cannabis with <10% THC was available, about 12% (95% CI 3.0-16.1%) of first-episode psychosis cases from the overall sample could have been prevented. In areas where more potent cannabis is popular, they suggested upwards of 30% (95% CI 15.2-40.0%) of first psychosis cases could have been avoided in London (where the most common product is 14% THC) and over 50% (95% CI 27.4- 66.0%) of cases in Amsterdam could have been prevented if only low potency cannabis was an option. Source: MedPage Today WHAT IS BENZEDREX, AND HOW IS IT ABUSED? Continued from Page 2 When people abuse the drug, a number of significant negative effects may occur. According to the Handbook of the Medical Consequences of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, propylhexedrine abuse has been associated with the following: rapid heart rate - blood pressure changes - heart palpitations - chest pain - irregular heartbeat - excess fluid surrounding the heart - heart attack - cardiopulmonary arrest - rapid breathing - shortness of breath - respiratory distress - excessive fluid in the lungs – psychosis – fever – chills – shaking – sepsis - death Injecting propylhexedrine is linked with swelling, tissue death, ulcers, cellulitis, changes in sensation, bruising, and abscesses.
Recommended publications
  • House Bill No. 2191
    SECOND REGULAR SESSION HOUSE BILL NO. 2191 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE QUADE. 5582H.01I D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal section 579.060, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to controlled substances, with penalty provisions. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows: Section A. Section 579.060, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu 2 thereof, to be known as section 579.060, to read as follows: 579.060. 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful sale, distribution, or purchase of 2 over-the-counter methamphetamine precursor drugs if he or she knowingly: 3 (1) Sells, distributes, dispenses, or otherwise provides any number of packages of any 4 drug product containing detectable amounts of ephedrine, levomethamphetamine, 5 phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any of their salts, optical 6 isomers, or salts of optical isomers, in a total amount greater than nine grams to the same 7 individual within a thirty-day period, unless the amount is dispensed, sold, or distributed 8 pursuant to a valid prescription; or 9 (2) Purchases, receives, or otherwise acquires within a thirty-day period any number of 10 packages of any drug product containing any detectable amount of ephedrine, 11 levomethamphetamine, phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any 12 of their salts or optical isomers, or salts of optical isomers in a total amount greater than nine 13 grams, without regard to the number of transactions, unless the amount is purchased, received, 14 or acquired pursuant to a valid prescription; or 15 (3) Purchases, receives, or otherwise acquires within a twenty-four-hour period any 16 number of packages of any drug product containing any detectable amount of ephedrine, 17 levomethamphetamine, phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted from the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael H. Daub Attorney at Law 10249 Yellow Circle Drive Suite 102 Minnetonka, Mn 55343
    MICHAEL H. DAUB ATTORNEY AT LAW 10249 YELLOW CIRCLE DRIVE SUITE 102 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TELEPHONE: (612) 333-1943 E-MAIL: [email protected] February 16, 2021 Representative Zack Stephenson 509 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 In Re: HF 600 Dear Representative Stephenson, I am a drug and substance use disorder policy expert. I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on HF 600 which proposes to regulate adult-use cannabis. There are aspects of HF 600 which I support and some that I oppose. Dr. Karen Randall, a Pueblo, Colorado emergency department physician who specializes in cannabis science and medicine states that “the legalization of marijuana has damaged, rather than helped,” her home state. She goes on to state that, “I think the public needs to know that we are not okay...the grand experiment is not going well. I don’t think the public is hearing about this as they should be.” She adds, “State government has not only ignored scientific findings about marijuana’s effects to push sales, but failed in the regulatory responsibility it promised would accompany legislation.” In support of her statements, she focused on high potency cannabis products, a marked increase in medical problems, misguided impressions of cannabis’ benefits, increased homelessness, and a growing population of chronic, cannabis dependent users. Minnesota sits at a crossroads. Cannabis legalization brings with it difficult legal and policy challenges. Although Minnesota partially decriminalized cannabis in 1976, the legalization movement never gained much momentum. In 2014, Minnesota legalized medical cannabis. Although the federal law criminalizing cannabis, the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (“CSA”) remains in effect, the budding experiment to legalize cannabis has not withered on the vine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stimulants and Hallucinogens Under Consideration: a Brief Overview of Their Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 17 (1986) 107-118 107 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd. THE STIMULANTS AND HALLUCINOGENS UNDER CONSIDERATION: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THEIR CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGY LOUIS S. HARRIS Dcparlmcnl of Pharmacology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Unwersity, Richmond, VA 23298 (U.S.A.) SUMMARY The substances under review are a heterogenous set of compounds from a pharmacological point of view, though many have a common phenylethyl- amine structure. Variations in structure lead to marked changes in potency and characteristic action. The introductory material presented here is meant to provide a set of chemical and pharmacological highlights of the 28 substances under con- sideration. The most commonly used names or INN names, Chemical Abstract (CA) names and numbers, and elemental formulae are provided in the accompanying figures. This provides both some basic information on the substances and a starting point for the more detailed information that follows in the individual papers by contributors to the symposium. Key words: Stimulants, their chemistry and pharmacology - Hallucinogens, their chemistry and pharmacology INTRODUCTION Cathine (Fig. 1) is one of the active principles of khat (Catha edulis). The structure has two asymmetric centers and exists as two geometric isomers, each of which has been resolved into its optical isomers. In the plant it exists as d-nor-pseudoephedrine. It is a typical sympathomimetic amine with a strong component of amphetamine-like activity. The racemic mixture is known generically in this country and others as phenylpropanolamine (dl- norephedrine). It is widely available as an over-the-counter (OTC) anti- appetite agent and nasal decongestant.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Antihistamines Seunghoon Han* Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul St
    2014;22(1):13-18 TCP Translational and Clinical Pharmacology http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2014.22.1.13 Clinical Pharmacology Review for Primary Health Care Providers: I. Antihistamines Seunghoon Han* Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea *Correspondence: S. Han; Tel: +82-2-2258-7326, Fax: +82-2-2258-7876, E-mail: [email protected] Received 31 May 2014 Primary health care providers play a critical role in maintaining public health, and the appropri- Accepted 31 May 2014 ate use of pharmaceutical products is one of the major parts of their practice. This series of articles, pISSN: 2289-0882 entitled ‘Clinical Pharmacology Review for Primary Health Care Providers,’ is intended to help pri- mary health care providers select more appropriate prescriptions for frequently used drugs based on up-to-date information. We expect that this effort will contribute to improvements in public health and diminish unnecessary drug use. Introduction tion on the H1 receptor.[8] THERAPEU Antihistamines include some of the most frequently prescribed drugs in the primary health care environment for the symp- Generations and Classes tomatic relief of allergic diseases, the common cold, urticaria, Many primary health care providers are well-informed about T and insomnia.[1-5] The importance of antihistamines has been the different ‘generations’ of antihistamines but not about the ICS TU emphasized as the prevalence of target diseases increases.[6,7] different ‘classes’ characterized according to chemical structure. However, the appropriate use, clinical effectiveness, and target [1] This discrepancy seems reasonable because ‘inter-generation’ T populations for prescription of antihistamines are still a matter differences are more prominent than ‘inter-class’ differences.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Prohibited List International Standard
    The World Anti-Doping Code THE 2014 PROHIBITED LIST INTERNATIONAL STANDARD Version 2.0 (revised 2014 version) The official text of the Prohibited List shall be maintained by WADA and shall be published in English and French. In the event of any conflict between the English and French versions, the English version shall prevail. This List shall come into effect on 1 September 2014 The revised 2014 Prohibited List 17 May 2014 THE 2014 PROHIBITED LIST WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE Valid 1 September 2014 In accordance with Article 4.2.2 of the World Anti-Doping Code, all Prohibited Substances shall be considered as “Specified Substances” except Substances in classes S1, S2, S4.4, S4.5, S6.a, and Prohibited Methods M1, M2 and M3. SUBSTANCES AND METHODS PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN- AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES S0. NON-APPROVED SUBSTANCES Any pharmacological substance which is not addressed by any of the subsequent sections of the List and with no current approval by any governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use (e.g drugs under pre-clinical or clinical development or discontinued, designer drugs, substances approved only for veterinary use) is prohibited at all times. S1. ANABOLIC AGENTS Anabolic agents are prohibited. 1. Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) a. Exogenous* AAS, including: 1-androstenediol (5α-androst-1-ene-3β,17β-diol ); 1-androstenedione (5α- androst-1-ene-3,17-dione); bolandiol (estr-4-ene-3β,17β-diol ); bolasterone; boldenone; boldione (androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione); calusterone; clostebol;
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Medical Cannabis Price Study
    Minnesota Department of Health Office of Medical Cannabis Report on Medical Cannabis Price Study Version 1.2 Submitted by: Bill Brown, Principal Yoko McCarthy, Manager BerryDunn 2211 Congress Street Portland, ME 04102 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Office of Medical Cannabis (OMC) ................................................................................... 2 1.3 Registered Medical Cannabis Manufacturers.................................................................... 2 1.4 Products Offered in Minnesota and Definitions ................................................................. 3 2.0 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Results ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
    Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Chapter 13. Controlled Substances Article 1
    TITLE 16. CRIMES AND OFFENSES CHAPTER 13. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS § 16-13-1. Drug related objects (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 2 of this chapter, relating to controlled substances. For the purposes of this Code section, the term "controlled substance" shall include marijuana as defined by paragraph (16) of Code Section 16-13-21. (2) "Dangerous drug" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 3 of this chapter, relating to dangerous drugs. (3) "Drug related object" means any machine, instrument, tool, equipment, contrivance, or device which an average person would reasonably conclude is intended to be used for one or more of the following purposes: (A) To introduce into the human body any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (B) To enhance the effect on the human body of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (C) To conceal any quantity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; or (D) To test the strength, effectiveness, or purity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state. (4) "Knowingly" means having general knowledge that a machine, instrument, tool, item of equipment, contrivance, or device is a drug related object or having reasonable grounds to believe that any such object is or may, to an average person, appear to be a drug related object.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Warns That Abuse and Misuse of the Nasal Decongestant Propylhexedrine Causes Serious Harm This Includes Heart and Mental Health Problems Or Death
    FDA warns that abuse and misuse of the nasal decongestant propylhexedrine causes serious harm This includes heart and mental health problems or death 3-25-2021 FDA Drug Safety Communication What safety concern is FDA announcing? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning that the abuse and misuse of the over- the-counter (OTC) nasal decongestant propylhexedrine can lead to serious harm such as heart and mental health problems. Some of these complications, which include fast or abnormal heart rhythm, high blood pressure, and paranoia, can lead to hospitalization, disability, or death. Reports of individuals abusing and misusing propylhexedrine have increased in recent years. Propylhexedrine is safe and effective when used as directed. What is FDA doing? We are requesting that all manufacturers of OTC propylhexedrine nasal decongestant inhalers consider product design changes that support its safe use. For example, modifying the product to create a physical barrier that would make tampering with the device and abusing the propylhexedrine inside more difficult. In addition, decreasing the amount of medicine the device contains could also reduce the risk of serious side effects if abused or misused. We continue to evaluate this safety issue and will determine if additional FDA actions are needed. What is propylhexedrine and how can it help me? Propylhexedrine is a nasal decongestant that is available OTC in an inhaler. It is used short term to temporarily relieve nasal congestion due to colds, hay fever, or other upper respiratory allergies. It works by reducing swelling and inflammation of the mucous membrane lining of the nose.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Release
    Product list Modified Release Our product list consist of the pharmaceuticals, pharmaceutical associations and food in the dosages and forms most required by our customers (please check www.osmopharm.com for more details). Our Research and Development competencies are assuring the flexibility in developing new formulations and forms of the products in list as well as new ones. PRODUCTS RELEASE BULK FORM DOSAGE FINAL FORM THERAPEUTICITY A Acetazolamide SR Pellets 500 mg caps Diuretic Alfacalcidol IR Pellets 1 μg caps Vit D supplement Alfuzosin Hydrochloride SR Powder 2.5 mg – 10 mg tabs Prostatic Hypertrophy agent Allopurinol SR Pellets 300 mg caps Antiurolytic Alprazolam SR Pellets 1 mg caps Anxiolytic Ambroxol HCI SR Pellets 75 mg, 120 mg caps Expectorant Ambroxol HCI SR Resinates 75 mg, 120 mg caps / tabs Expectorant Amitriptyline SR Pellets 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg caps Antidepressant Aspirin EC, IR Pellets 100 mg caps Anticoagulant Aspirin EC, IR Microcapsules 100 mg caps / tabs Anticoagulant Atenolol IR Pellets 50 mg caps Antihypertensive Azithromycin IR Pellets 250 mg caps Antibiotic B B-complex Benproperine IR Resinates 25 mg, 50 mg caps / tabs Antitussive Betahistine 2HCI SR Pellets 12 mg, 24 mg, 48 mg caps Vasodilator Bromopride* SR Pellets 20 mg caps Antiemetic Brompheniramine maleate SR Pellets 6 mg, 8 mg, 12 mg caps Antihistaminic C Caffeine SR, IR Pellets 25 mg, 50 mg, 300 mg caps CNS Stimulant Carbetapentane citrate SR Pellets 75 mg caps Antitussive Carbinoxamine maleate SR Pellets 4mg, 6 mg caps Antihistaminic Carbinoxamine
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Cannabis in Minnesota
    Medical Cannabis in Minnesota Tom Arneson, MD, MPH | Research Manager MN Employers Workers Comp. Alliance: June 8, 2017 Office of Medical Cannabis • 2014: MN became 22 nd state with full medical cannabis program Recreational and Medical (8) Medical (21) Low THC/High CBD Products (15) 6/14/2017 2 Office of Medical Cannabis However: • State medical cannabis programs are illegal under current federal law 6/14/2017 mn.gov/medicalcannabis 3 Office of Medical Cannabis Minnesota's program is different from most others • No smokeable or plant form marijuana (only liquids and oils in capsule, tincture, or vaporized form. Topical preparations of oils starting in August, 2017) • Commitment to learning from experience with the program (reports and observational studies on effectiveness, side effects, etc.) 6/14/2017 mn.gov/medicalcannabis 4 Office of Medical Cannabis Brief History • Documentation of therapeutic use of cannabis for thousands of years in India and China • 1839: William O’Shaughnessy – Irish physician working in India studied medical uses of cannabis; introduced it to European medicine when he returned to London • 1894: Queen Victoria’s physician praises therapeutic value of cannabis in the first issue of Lancet . (Queen Victoria was treated with cannabis for dysmenorrhea) • Sir William Osler, one of the founders of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine wrote the famous first textbook of internal medicine in 1892. it included his assessment that cannabis was the best treatment for migraine headache. 6/14/2017 mn.gov/medicalcannabis 5 Office of Medical Cannabis History (continued) • Recreational use of cannabis started in the Southwest around 1900, introduced by Mexican workers crossing the border • American doctors wrote millions of prescriptions for cannabis each year in the 1920s • 1937: Marijuana Tax Act: small annual tax on all involved with commercial use of cannabis, including physicians.
    [Show full text]