DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, GOWAN CHLORPYRIFOS 4E, 11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, GOWAN CHLORPYRIFOS 4E, 11 JO/~3-ISK REST RIC11'30 ED IUSEWOO PESTICIDE For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators or persons under their direct supervision and only for those uses I covered by the CertIfied Applicator's certification. GOWAN CHLORPYRIFOS 4E Insecticide for Agricultural Use Only ACCEPTEff ACTIVE INGREDIENT: % ByWt. O-(3.5IHnchloro-2-pyndinyl) phosphorolhioate .•.... .407% o~~~~~~~~i6~~i'i;~thyl NQV· •. ::1.0.2000 .•. · .................. 593% TOTAL 1000"" PRECAUCION AL USARIO: Si usled no lee ingles, no use esle producto hasta que la etiqueta Ie haya sido explicada ampliamente. ( FIRST AID IF SWALLOWED: Call a physician or Poison Control Center immediately. Do not induce vomiting. Contains aromatic petroleum solvent. Do not give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. IF INHALED: Remove to fresh air if symptoms of cholinesterase inhibition appear and get medical attention immediately. IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and waler. Get medical attention. IF IN EYES: Flush with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Get medical attention. NOTE TO PHYSICIAN: Gowan Chlorpyrifos 4E is a cholinesterase inhibitor. Treat symptomatically. If exposed, plasma and red blood cell cholinesterase tests may indicate significance of exposure (baseline data are useful). Atropine, only by injection, is the preferable antidote. If given early, 2-PAM may be given; however use only in conjunction with atropine. In case of severe acute poisoning, use antidote immediately after establishing an open airway and respiration. PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals May be fatal if swallowed. Harmful if absorbed through the skin. Causes moderate eye and skin irritation. Prolonged or frequently repeated skin contact may cause allergic reactions in some individuals. Avoid breathing vapor or spray mist. Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. ( PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL HAZARDS Do not use or store near heat or open flame. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS This pesticide is toxic to birds and wildlife, and extremely toxic to fish and aquatic organisms. Do not apply directly to water, to areas where surface water is present. or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Drift and runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in adjacent aquatIc srtes Cover or incorporate spills Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment washwaters. This product is highly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment or residues on bloommg crops Of weeds. Do not apply this product or allow it to drift to blooming crops or weeds if bees are visiting the treatment area Protective information may be obtained from your cooperative agricultural extension service NET CONTENTS __ GALLONS Gowan Company EPA Reg No 10163-158 PO 80x 5569 EPA Est. No 67545-AZ-1 Yuma, Arizona 85366-5569 DIRECTIONS FOR USE It is a violation of Federal law to use this product In a manner inconsistent with its labeling. Read all Directions for Use carefully before applying. This product cannot be reformulated or repackaged mto other end·use products. Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other persons, either directly or through drift Only protected handlers may be in the are during application. For any requirements specific to your state or tribe, cansu" the agency responsible for pesticide regulation. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMEN7 (PPI:) Applicators and other handlers must wear: • Coveralls over short-sleeved shirt and short pants • Chemical·resistant gloves such as Barrier Laminate or Viton • Chemical-resistant shoes plus socks • Protective eyewear Gogg~, face shield, or safety glasses with front, brow, and temp~ protection. • Chemical-resistant headgear for overhead exposure • Chemical-resistant apron when cleaning equipment and mixing or loading Discard clothing and other absorbent materials that have been drenched or heavily contaminated with this product's c'oncentrate Do not reuse them. Follow manufacturer's instructions for cleaning/maintaining PPE. If no such instructions for wash ables, use detergent and hot water Keep and wash PPE separately from other laundry USER SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS Users should: • Wash hands before eating, drinking, chewing gum, using tobacco or using the toilet. • Remove clothing immediately if pesticide gets inside. Then wash thoroughly and put on clean clothing. • Remove PPE immediately after handling this product. Wash the outside of gloves before removing. As soon as possible, wash thoroughly and change into clean clothing AGRICULTURAL USE REQUIREMENTS Use this product only in accordance with its labeling and with the Worker Protection Standard, 40 CFR Part 170. This Standard contains requirements for the protection of agricultural workers on farms, forests, nurseries, and greenhouses, and handlers of agricultural pesticides. It contains requirements for training, decontamination, notification, and emergency assistance. It also contains specffic instructions and exceptions pertaining to the statements on this label about personal protective equipment (PPE) and restrictecH!ntry interval. The requirements in this box only apply to uses of this product that are covered by the Worker Protection Standard. Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted-entry interval (REI) of 24 hours. Certified crop advisors or persons entering under their direct supervision under certain circumstances may be exempt from the early reentry requirement pursuant to 40 CFR Part 170. Exception: If the product is soil-injected or soil-incorporated Worker re-entry intervals (REI's) of a duration no less than the following: • For all crops: 24 hours, unless specifically noted as otherwise below • Tree nuts and sweet potatoes: 2 days • Fruit trees: 4 days • Pruning activities citrus: 5 days PPE required for early entry to treated areas that is permitted under the Worker Protection Standard and that involves contact with anything that has been treated, such as plants, soil, or water is: • Coveralls over short-sleeved shirt and short pants • Chemtcal-resistant gloves such as Barrier Laminate or Vlton ( • Chemical- resistant shoes plus socks • Chemtcal-resistant headgear for overhead exposure RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPLICATION Gowan Chlorpyrifos 4E is suitable for use in all conventional spray equipment. It may be used in tank mixtures with certain herbiCIdes andlor non­ pressure fertilizer solutions as recommended under specific crop use directions. Caution' Fertilizer solutions containing sulfur may inactivate Gowan Chlorpyrifos 4E. For best results In tank mixing, fill the mix tank '/3 full with water. Start agitation and add wettable powders first. flowables second, and emulsifiable concentrates last Before actual mixing, test compatibility of the tank mix by mixing products and water proportIonal for the tank mix in a pint or quart jar Shake the trial mix and observe whether the material precipitates. If precipitation occurs and will not redisperse, do not use that mix in the tank DILUTION DIRECTIONS The rate required to provide thorough, uniform coverage varies with plant growth at the time of application. The following rates are therefore intended to coverage a broad range of conditions. Dilute Applications: Field and Row Crops: Apply specified rate in 20-75 gallons of water per acre. Fruit and Nuts: Apply specIfied rate in 100-800 gallons of water per acre. For citrus, use up to 2,000 gallons of water per acre Concentrate Applications: Field and Row Crops. Apply specified rate in not less than 5 gallons of water per acre Fruits and Nuts Apply specified rate in 20-100 gallons of water per acre These applications require special concentrate equipment. Air Application: Field and Row Crops' Apply specified rate in a minimum of 1 gallon of water per acre. Fruit and Nuts' Apply specified rate in a minimum of 5 gallons of water per acre. CHEMIGATION DIRECTIONS Apply this product only through sprinkler including center pivot, lateral move, end tow, side (wheel) roll, traveler, big gun, solid set or hand move irrigation systems. Do not apply this product through any other type of irrigation system Crop injury, lack of effectiveness, or illegal pesticide residues in the crop can result from non-uniform distribution of treated water. A person knowledgeable of the chemigation system and responsible for its operation, or under the supervision of the responsible person, shall shut the system down and make necessary adjustments should the need arise. If you have questions about calibration, you should contact State ExtenSion Service specialists, equipment manufacturers or other experts 00 not connect an irrigation system (including greenhouse systems) used for pesticide applications to a public water system unless the pesticide label·prescribed safety devices for public water systems are in place Public water system means a system for the provision to the public of piped water for human consumption if such system has at least 15 service connections or regularty serves an average of at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year Chernigation systems connected to public water systems must contain a functional, reduced-pressure lone, backflow preventer (RZP) Of" the functional equivalent in the water supply line, upstream from the point of pesticide introduction. As an "'ption to the RrZ, t!'l~ 'vater fr')ffi thf' public water system should be discharged into a reservoir tank prior to pesticide introduction. There shall be a cnmpl~e physicpl brf?ak. (air g.-p) belween the outlet end of the fill pipe and the top or overflow rim of the reservoir tank of at least twice the inside diameter o(!he fill pj~ for non-~\Jb;ic \oIat~r sprinkler chemigation systems, the system must contain a functional check valve, vacuum relief val\e. ... nd 1;),"/ preSJ.Jf a dr;:.ln appro;:>natel~' located on the irrigation pipeline to prevent water source contamination from backflow The pesticide injection pipeline must contain a functional, automatic. quick-closing check valve to p4'"event the flow of flutd back toward the injection pump. The pesticide injection pipeline must also contain a functional, normally closed, solenoid--o~a,'a.tec.: .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) Ddvp (Dichlorvos) Diazinon Malathion Parathion
    CHLORPYRIFOS (DURSBAN) DDVP (DICHLORVOS) DIAZINON MALATHION PARATHION Method no.: 62 Matrix: Air Procedure: Samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through specially constructed glass sampling tubes, each containing a glass fiber filter and two sections of XAD-2 adsorbent. Samples are desorbed with toluene and analyzed by GC using a flame photometric detector (FPD). Recommended air volume and sampling rate: 480 L at 1.0 L/min except for Malathion 60 L at 1.0 L/min for Malathion Target concentrations: 1.0 mg/m3 (0.111 ppm) for Dichlorvos (PEL) 0.1 mg/m3 (0.008 ppm) for Diazinon (TLV) 0.2 mg/m3 (0.014 ppm) for Chlorpyrifos (TLV) 15.0 mg/m3 (1.11 ppm) for Malathion (PEL) 0.1 mg/m3 (0.008 ppm) for Parathion (PEL) Reliable quantitation limits: 0.0019 mg/m3 (0.21 ppb) for Dichlorvos (based on the RAV) 0.0030 mg/m3 (0.24 ppb) for Diazinon 0.0033 mg/m3 (0.23 ppb) for Chlorpyrifos 0.0303 mg/m3 (2.2 ppb) for Malathion 0.0031 mg/m3 (0.26 ppb) for Parathion Standard errors of estimate at the target concentration: 5.3% for Dichlorvos (Section 4.6.) 5.3% for Diazinon 5.3% for Chlorpyrifos 5.6% for Malathion 5.3% for Parathion Status of method: Evaluated method. This method has been subjected to the established evaluation procedures of the Organic Methods Evaluation Branch. Date: October 1986 Chemist: Donald Burright Organic Methods Evaluation Branch OSHA Analytical Laboratory Salt Lake City, Utah 1 of 27 T-62-FV-01-8610-M 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chlorpyrifos
    United State. Office of Water EPA 440/5-86~05 Environmental Protection Regulations and Standards September 1986 Amy l. lea~erry Agency Criteria and Standards Division Washington DC 20460 Water &EPA Ambient Wat'er Quality Criteria for Chlorpyrifos - 1986 &~IENT AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR CHLORPYRIFOS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES DULUTH, MINNESOTA NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND NOTICES This document has been reviewed by the Criteria and Standards Division, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This document is availaryle to the public throu~h the National Technical Inf0rmation Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. 11 FOREWORD Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217) requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to publish water quality criteria that accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge on the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on health and welfare that might be expected from the presence of pollutants in any body of water~ including ground water. This document is a revision of proposed criteria based upon consideration of comments received from other Federal agencies~ State agencies~ special interest groups~ and individual scientists. Criteria contained in this document replace any previously published EPA aquatic life criteria for the same pollutant(s). The term "water quality criteria" is used in two sections of the Clean Water Act~ section 304(a)(1) and section 303(c)(2).
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides and Toxic Substances
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 2006 SUBJECT: Finalization of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs) and Interim Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decisions (TREDs) for the Organophosphate Pesticides, and Completion of the Tolerance Reassessment and Reregistration Eligibility Process for the Organophosphate Pesticides FROM: Debra Edwards, Director Special Review and Reregistration Division Office of Pesticide Programs TO: Jim Jones, Director Office of Pesticide Programs As you know, EPA has completed its assessment of the cumulative risks from the organophosphate (OP) class of pesticides as required by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. In addition, the individual OPs have also been subject to review through the individual- chemical review process. The Agency’s review of individual OPs has resulted in the issuance of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs) for 22 OPs, interim Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decisions (TREDs) for 8 OPs, and a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for one OP, malathion.1 These 31 OPs are listed in Appendix A. EPA has concluded, after completing its assessment of the cumulative risks associated with exposures to all of the OPs, that: (1) the pesticides covered by the IREDs that were pending the results of the OP cumulative assessment (listed in Attachment A) are indeed eligible for reregistration; and 1 Malathion is included in the OP cumulative assessment. However, the Agency has issued a RED for malathion, rather than an IRED, because the decision was signed on the same day as the completion of the OP cumulative assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Qsar Analysis of the Chemical Hydrolysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Natural Waters
    QSAR ANALYSIS OF THE CHEMICAL HYDROLYSIS OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDES IN NATURAL WATERS. by Kenneth K. Tanji Principal Investigator and Jonathan 1. Sullivan Graduate Research Assistant Department of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis Technical Completion Report Project Number W-843 August, 1995 University of California Water Resource Center The research leading to this report was supported by the University of California Water Resource Center as part of Water Resource Center Project W-843. Table of Contents Page Abstract 2 Problem and Research Objectives 3 Introduction 5 Theoretical Background 6 QSAR Methodology 7 Molecular Connectivity Theory 8 Organophosphorus Pesticides 12 Experimental Determination of Rates 15 Results and Discussion 17 Principal Findings and Significance 19 References 34 List of Tables Page Table 1. Statistical relationship between OP pesticides and first-order MC/'s. 30 Table 2. Inherent conditions of waters used in experimental work. 16 Table 3. Estimated half-lives for organophosphorus esters derived from model. 31 Table 4. Half-lives and first-order MCI' sfor model calibration data set. 31 Table 5. Experimental kinetic data for validation set compounds, Sacramento. 33 List of Figures Page Figure 1. Essential Features OfQSAR Modeling Methodology. 21 Figure 2. Regression plot for In hydrolysis rate vs. 1st order MCl' s. 22 Figure 3. a 3-D molecular model, a line-segment model and a graphical model. 23 Figure 4. Molecular connectivity index suborders. 24 Figure 5. Chlorpyrifos and its fourteen fourth order path/cluster fragments. 25 Figure 6. Abridged MClndex output. 26 Figure 7. Parent acids of most common organophosphorus pesticides. 12 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Criteria 63 ORGANOPHOSPHORUS
    Environmental Health Criteria 63 ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES: A GENERAL INTRODUCTION Please note that the layout and pagination of this web version are not identical with the printed version. Organophophorus insecticides: a general introduction (EHC 63, 1986) INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 63 ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES: A GENERAL INTRODUCTION This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization. Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization World Health Orgnization Geneva, 1986 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents, coordination
    [Show full text]
  • For Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document for Aldicarb
    United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances September 2007 Agency (7508P) Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document for Aldicarb List A Case Number 0140 Approved by: Date: Steven Bradbury, Ph.D. Director Special Review and Reregistration Division Page 2 of 191 Table of Contents Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team ........................................................................ 5 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 6 Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 8 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 II. Chemical Overview.................................................................................................................. 11 A. Chemical Identity..................................................................................................................11 B. Regulatory History ................................................................................................................12 C. Use and Usage Profile...........................................................................................................12 D. Tolerances .............................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorpyrifos Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: a Synoptic Review
    Biological Report Contaminant Hazard Reviews March 1988 Report No. 13 CHLORPYRIFOS HAZARDS TO FISH, WILDLIFE, AND INVERTEBRATES: A SYNOPTIC REVIEW By Edward W. Odenkirchen Department of Biology The American University Washington, DC 20016 And Ronald Eisler U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Laurel, MD 20708 SUMMARY Chlorpyrifos (phosphorothioic acid O, O,-diethyl 0-(3,5,6,-trichloro-2-pyridinyl) ester), an organophosphorus compound with an anticholinesterase mode of action, is used extensively in a variety of formulations to control a broad spectrum of agricultural and other pestiferous insects. Domestic use of chlorpyrifos in 1982 was about 3.6 million kg; the compound is used mostly in agriculture, but also to control mosquitos in wetlands (0.15 million kg applied to about 600,000 ha) and turf-destroying insects on golf courses (0.04 million kg). Accidental or careless applications of chlorpyrifos have resulted in the death of many species of nontarget organisms such as fish, aquatic invertebrates, birds, and humans. Applications at recommended rates of 0.028 to 0.056 kg/surface ha for mosquito control have produced mortality, bioaccumulation, and deleterious sublethal effects in aquatic plants, zooplankton, insects, rotifers, crustaceans, waterfowl, and fish; adverse effects were also noted in bordering invertebrate populations. Degradation rate of chloropyrifos in abiotic substrates varies, ranging from about 1 week in seawater (50% degradation) to more than 24 weeks in soils under conditions of dryness, low temperatures, reduced microbial activity, and low organic content; intermediate degradation rates reported have been 3.4 weeks for sediments and 7.6 weeks for distilled water.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholinesterase: the “Hub” for Neurodegenerative Diseases And
    Review biomolecules Acetylcholinesterase: The “Hub” for NeurodegenerativeReview Diseases and Chemical Weapons Acetylcholinesterase: The “Hub” for Convention Neurodegenerative Diseases and Chemical WeaponsSamir F. de A. Cavalcante Convention 1,2,3,*, Alessandro B. C. Simas 2,*, Marcos C. Barcellos 1, Victor G. M. de Oliveira 1, Roberto B. Sousa 1, Paulo A. de M. Cabral 1 and Kamil Kuča 3,*and Tanos C. C. França 3,4,* Samir F. de A. Cavalcante 1,2,3,* , Alessandro B. C. Simas 2,*, Marcos C. Barcellos 1, Victor1 Institute G. M. ofde Chemical, Oliveira Biological,1, Roberto Radiological B. Sousa and1, Paulo Nuclear A. Defense de M. Cabral (IDQBRN),1, Kamil Brazilian Kuˇca Army3,* and TanosTechnological C. C. França Center3,4,* (CTEx), Avenida das Américas 28705, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.B.); [email protected] (V.G.M.d.O.); [email protected] 1 Institute of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (IDQBRN), Brazilian Army (R.B.S.); [email protected] (P.A.d.M.C.) Technological Center (CTEx), Avenida das Américas 28705, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, Brazil; 2 [email protected] Mors Institute of Research (M.C.B.); on Natural [email protected] Products (IPPN), Federal (V.G.M.d.O.); University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS,[email protected] Bloco H, Rio de Janeiro (R.B.S.); 21941-902, [email protected] Brazil (P.A.d.M.C.) 32 DepartmentWalter Mors of Institute Chemistry, of Research Faculty of on Science, Natural Un Productsiversity (IPPN),
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,703,064 Yokoi Et Al
    US005703064A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,703,064 Yokoi et al. 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 30, 1997 54 PESTICIDAL COMBINATIONS FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 75 Inventors: Shinji Yokoi; Akira Nishida, both of 0 196524 10/1986 European Pat. Of.. Shiga-ken; Tokio Obata; Kouichi Golka, both of Ube, all of Japan OTHER PUBLICATIONS 73) Assignees: Sankyo Company, Limited, Tokyo; Worthing et al, The Pesticide Manual, 9th Ed. (1991), pp. Ube industries Ltd., Ube, both of 747 and 748. Japan L.C. Gaughan et al., "Pesticide interactions: effects of orga nophosphorus pesticides on the metabolism, toxicity, and 21 Appl. No.: 405,795 persistence of selected pyrethroid insecticides". Chemical Abstracts, vol. 94, No. 9, 1981, No. 59740k of Pestic. 22 Filed: Mar 16, 1995 Biochem. Physio., vol. 14, No. 1, 1980, pp. 81-85. 30 Foreign Application Priority Data I. Ishaaya et al., "Cypermethrin synergism by pyrethroid esterase inhibitors in adults of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci". Mar 16, 1994 JP Japan ............................ HE6045.405 Chemical Abstracts, vol. 107, No. 9, 1987, No. 72818y of (51) Int. Cl................. A01N 43/54; A01N 57/00 Pestic Biochem. Physiol., vol. 28, No. 2, 1987, pp. 155-162. 52 U.S. C. ......................................... 51480; 514/256 (58) Field of Search ..................................... 514/80, 256 Primary Examiner Allen J. Robinson Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Frishauf, Holtz, Goodman, 56 References Cited Langer & Chick, P.C. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 57 ABSTRACT 4,374,833 2/1983 Badmin et al. ...................... 424/225 Combinations of the known compound pyrimidifen with 4,845,097 7/1989 Matsumoto et al... 514/234.2 phosphorus-containing pesticides have a synergistic pesti 4,935,516 6/1990 Ataka et al.
    [Show full text]
  • OHA 8964 Technical Report: Marijuana Contaminant Testing
    TECHNICAL REPORT: OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY’S PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHICH TYPES OF CONTAMINANTS TO TEST FOR IN CANNABIS PRODUCTS, AND LEVELS FOR ACTION Author David G. Farrer, Ph.D. Public Health Toxicologist PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Technical Report: Oregon Health Authority’s Process to Determine Which Types of Contaminants to Test for in Cannabis Products, and Levels for Action* Author: David G. Farrer, Ph.D., Public Health Toxicologist Acknowledgments OHA would like to thank the following individuals and organizations for their valuable contributions to the development of cannabis testing Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR 333-7-0010 through 333-7-0100 and OAR 333-7-0400 and 333-7-0410 Exhibit A) and this report: Brian Boling Rose Kachadoorian Laboratory Program Manager Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Jeremy L. Sackett Cascadia Labs, Cannabis Safety Theodore R. Bunch, Jr. Institute, and Oregon Cannabis Pesticide Analytical and Response Association Center Coordination Leader Oregon Department of Agriculture Bethany Sherman Oregon Growers Analytical and Keith Crosby Cannabis Safety Institute Technical Director Synergistic Pesticide Lab Shannon Swantek Oregon Environmental Laboratory Ric Cuchetto Accreditation Program, Public The Cannabis Chemist Health Division, Oregon Health Authority Camille Holladay Lab Director Rodger B. Voelker, Ph.D. Synergistic Pesticide Lab Lab Director Oregon Growers Analytical Mowgli Holmes, Ph.D. Phylos Bioscience and Cannabis Safety Institute For information on this report, contact David Farrer at [email protected]. * Please cite this publication as follows: Farrer DG. Technical report: Oregon Health Authority’s process to decide which types of contaminants to test for in cannabis. Oregon Health Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Lists
    United States Office of Solid Waste EPA 550-B-10-001 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response May 2010 Agency www.epa.gov/emergencies LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right- To-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act • EPCRA Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances • CERCLA Hazardous Substances • EPCRA Section 313 Toxic Chemicals • CAA 112(r) Regulated Chemicals For Accidental Release Prevention Office of Emergency Management This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................................ i List of Lists – Conslidated List of Chemicals (by CAS #) Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act ................................................. 1 Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Consolidated List ..................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Radionuclides Listed Under CERCLA .......................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: RCRA Waste Streams and Unlisted Hazardous Wastes................................................ C-1 This page intentionally left blank. LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • NMP-Free Formulations of Neonicotinoids
    (19) & (11) EP 2 266 400 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 29.12.2010 Bulletin 2010/52 A01N 43/40 (2006.01) A01N 43/86 (2006.01) A01N 47/40 (2006.01) A01N 51/00 (2006.01) (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 09305544.0 A01P 7/00 A01N 25/02 (22) Date of filing: 15.06.2009 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventors: AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR • Gasse, Jean-Jacques HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL 27600 Saint-Aubin-Sur-Gaillon (FR) PT RO SE SI SK TR • Duchamp, Guillaume Designated Extension States: 92230 Gennevilliers (FR) AL BA RS • Cantero, Maria 92230 Gennevilliers (FR) (71) Applicant: NUFARM 92233 Gennevelliers (FR) (74) Representative: Cabinet Plasseraud 52, rue de la Victoire 75440 Paris Cedex 09 (FR) (54) NMP-free formulations of neonicotinoids (57) The invention relates to NMP-free liquid formulation comprising at least one nicotinoid and at least one aprotic polar component selected from the group comprising the compounds of formula I, II or III below, and mixtures thereof, wherein R1 and R2 independently represent H or an alkyl group having less than 5 carbons, preferably a methyl group, and n represents an integer ranging from 0 to 5, and to their applications. EP 2 266 400 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 266 400 A1 Description Technical Field of the invention 5 [0001] The invention relates to novel liquid formulations of neonicotinoids and to their use for treating plants, for protecting plants from pests and/or for controlling pests infestation.
    [Show full text]