DOCSLIB.ORG

Modified Neighbourhood Plan – Consultation Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEWPORT PAGNELL MODIFIED NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN THE CONSULTATION STATEMENT This document provides details of all the various forms of consultation that have fed into the modification of the Newport Pagnell Neighbourhood Plan. 1. THE STEERING GROUP The Steering Group, otherwise known as the Neighbourhood Plan Implementation Group (NPIG), consists of voting members, these being seven Town Councillors (Cllrs Phil Winsor - Chairman, Ian Carman, Euan Henderson, Diane Kitchen, Richard Pearson, Joan Sidebottom and Steve Urwin), a non-voting member (Alan Mills - retired senior planning officer), the Town Clerk (Shar Roselman) and the Deputy Clerk (Patrick Donovan). 2. SIX WEEKS CONSULTATION WITH STATUTORY AND OTHER CONSULTEES The six-week pre-submission consultation period ran from 1st September 2020 to 12th October 2020. At the time of the pre-submission consultation, Newport Pagnell Town Council and the steering group wrote letters and/or emailed the following consultees, formally opening the consultation and advising them of the Town Council’s website address where the consultation documents could be read, and inviting comments: 2.1 Landowners, interested developers and agents 2.2 Milton Keynes Council Planning 2.3 Milton Keynes Council Highways 2.4 Milton Keynes Council Schools Liaison Team 2.5 Milton Keynes Council Infrastructure Coordination & Delivery Team 2.6 Milton Keynes Council Planning Obligations & Tariffs 2.7 NHS Milton Keynes Clinical Commissioning Group 2.8 Hertfordshire & South Midlands Area Team of NHS England 2.9 Ward Councillors of Unitary Authority representing the area 2.10 The Newport Pagnell Business Association 2.11 The Newport Pagnell Partnership 2.12 Milton Keynes Chamber of Commerce 2.13 Neighbouring Parish Councils 2.14 Central Beds Council 2.15 Housing Associations in the area 2.16 Affected Utility Companies and water and sewerage organisations. 2.17 The Environment Agency 2.18 Canals & Rivers Trust 2.19 Bedford Group of Drainage Boards 2.20 Thames Valley Police 2.21 Buckinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service 2.22 Natural England 2.23 English Heritage 2.24 Homes England 2.25 Historic England 2.26 The Coal Authority 2.27 The Homes and Communities Agency 2.28 Businesses in the town 2.29 Telecomms Operators and Mobile Operators Association 2.30 British Telecom 2.31 The National Grid 2.32 Religious bodies in the community 2.33 The Carnival Committee 2.34 The Christmas Lights Committee 2.35 The Re-enactment Committee 2.36 The Assisted Swimming Club 2.37 Places Leisure – partner in leisure of the Town Council 2.38 Sport England 2.39 Marine Management Organisation 2.40 Public transport providers operating within the area 2.41 Local schools 2.42 Medical centres/GP surgeries 2.43 Network Rail 2.44 Highways England 2.45 MK Community Foundation 2.46 Community Action MK 2.47 Rotary Club of Newport Pagnell 2.48 Newport Pagnell & Olney Lions Club 2.49 The Brooklands Centre 2.50 MK Equality Council 2.51 MK Council of Faiths 2.52 Disability Action Group 2.53 Member of Parliament for Milton Keynes North 3. METHODS OF CONSULTATION Residents received the Town Council’s quarterly publication (Town Talk) delivered to every home in Newport Pagnell advising them of where they could find the consultation documents and how to make comments on the proposals. Because of the coronavirus restrictions, the Town Council was unable to offer the facility for residents to visit an open public session en masse or to visit the Public Library to view a hard copy of the consultation documents, but everyone was given the opportunity to either request a hard copy by post or visit the Town Council offices personally to view the document. An online survey was set up (Survey Monkey) giving residents the opportunity to comment on the proposals. The survey was advertised on the Town Council’s website, on its Facebook Account, and on the Facebook Local Chit Chat Group in Newport Pagnell that has 30,000 members, many living in Newport Pagnell. Messaging was sent out on the Town Council’s Instagram account. Targeted Facebook and Instagram messaging was also applied to Facebook and Instagram account holders with Newport Pagnell postcodes. Letters were hand delivered to all local businesses in the town centre. A large banner advertising the consultation was erected in the High Street on the railings outside the Rectory, opposite the Town Council offices. 4. LIST OF CONSULTEES WHO RESPONSED Action taken by Consultee Letter sent Email sent Response Amendments to NPNP NPTC in response Milton Keynes Council The Design Study will need to be submitted at Design Study and submission stage as it is specifically referred Conservation Area to in policy NP4. I would recommend that you Review was added to Milton Keynes Council include the Design Study and Conservation documents on website Area Review (or link to MKC website) on your and included in pre- 14/08/2020 19/08/2020 None website as part of the current submission consultation. consultation. Otherwise, anyone wishing to Milton Keynes Council comment on policy NP4 could rightly say that Planning Department Planning Department they don’t have all the information to judge and David Blandamer Civic Offices the policy. I’d be grateful if you could email a were sent copies of the 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes copy of the Design Study or alternatively a link Design Study and given MK9 3EJ to it once it’s on your website. the link. [email protected] New Figure 4 Tickford Fields – it might be clearer to combine site B and site C as one site called “Tickford Fields” as it is Fig 4 agreed to amend Milton Keynes Council, Planning Dept, David Blandamer (Senior 14/08/2020 19/08/2020 now coming forward as a single lettering. No need to New Fig 4 to be provided. Urban Designer) site. Site A could be renamed North amend policy wording. Crawley Road. This would also require some minor amendment to policy NP2. Policy NP2 refers to the three sites Noted. The policy does making up the Tickford Fields not but the Policies Map Amend Policies Map and Inset development, but the 930 dwellings does incorrectly show 3. relates only to sites B and C. Site A. New Figure 7 – the school is now being New Fig 7 to be provided and proposed alongside North Crawley Road, Fig 7 agreed. amend supporting text. rather than within the centre of the site. Disagree. They are all Policy NP4 – it seems to me that Policy sufficiently related to the NP4 is actually a number of different design policy which None policies: NP4A – windfall development; expands the old windfall NP4B-C – design and NP4D-E – heritage. policy with separate clauses. Policy NP4 (a)– Revised policy includes the text “Proposals to subdivide residential plots to develop new homes on rear or side garden land will not be Agree. The policy is supported.” NPPF para 70 states “Plans consistent with §70 but should consider the case for setting out the supporting text Amend supporting text only. policies to resist inappropriate should explain why this is development of residential gardens, for appropriate in the town. example where development would cause harm to the local area.” This policy should be qualified or justified in the supporting text. Disagree. The Study is a large document and has been prepared to be Policy NP4 (b) – the 2020 Newport published as a Pagnell Design Study should be included standalone document. None as an appendix to the Plan. Examiners routinely discourage the use of extensive appendices to the main NP document. Policy NP4 (e) – Shane Downer (Heritage and International Partnerships Officer, MKC) has suggested that the wording is amended to ‘Accredited Museum, Amend policy wording to read Heritage/Education Centre’. The word Not fully agreed. An “Accredited Museum, i.e. a ‘museum’ is subject to a nationally Accredited Museum will museum meeting or working applied set of standards, currently naturally be both a towards the national within the remit of the Arts Council. The Heritage and an standards set by the Arts Arts Council expect Local Authorities and Education Centre. Council.” any funds (e.g. S106) derived from us, to meet those standards to being an Accredited Museum or Working Towards Accreditation. Policy NP7 – the policy should accord with strategic policies in Plan:MK. I have asked colleagues in the Development Plans team to take a look at this policy. I will provide further comment on this policy, once they have got back to me. The Development Plans team responded with the following late comments: Comments on draft policy NP7 Part A: Rather than A as proposed we propose the following wording: A. Major housing developments shall contribute to the range of planning The policy wording has obligations set out within the policies of Changes have been made to been amended to reflect the Milton Keynes Council’s adopted reflect the wording required the MKC Development Local Plan (Plan:MK) and accompanying by the Development Plans Plan team’s late Supplementary Planning Documents team. representation. Comments on draft policy NP7 part B Rather than the current wording of Policy NP7 part B we propose the following: B. Smaller housing developments will also be required to contribute to the range of planning obligations if it is demonstrably clear that the net developable area of the site could otherwise accommodate a suitable major housing scheme. On phased schemes, a planning application for a phase with fewer than 11 homes as part of a larger site, will also be required to contribute to the range of planning obligations New Figure 10 - Designated linear park/recreation. This plan was based on Fig 10 now accords with the previous Local Plan.
Recommended publications
  • The Crown Estate Annual Report and Accounts 2010

    The Crown Estate Annual Report and Accounts 2010

    SUSTAINABILITY SHAPES OUR FUTURE Annual Report 2010 Page 1 The Crown Estate Annual Report 2010 Overview 2 Understanding The Crown Estate Sustainability lies at the heart of 4 Chairman’s statement The Crown Estate. Although Parliament 6 Chief executive’s overview 8 Progress on our ‘Going for Gold’ targets decrees that we operate as a commercial Performance organisation, we combine the commercial 10 Urban estate 16 Marine estate imperative with an equally firm 22 Rural estate 28 Windsor estate commitment to integrity and stewardship. 32 Financial review 40 Sustainability Our commitment to stewardship reflects Governance 52 The Board our ability to take the long-term view, 54 Governance report pursuing good environmental practice. 65 Remuneration report Financials In addition to our principal financial 67 The Certificate and Report of the duty we manage the assets in our care Comptroller and Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament for the sustainable, long-term benefit 68 Statement of income and expenditure 68 Statement of comprehensive income of our tenants and other customers; 69 Balance sheet their businesses; the communities they 70 Cash flow statement 71 Statement of changes in represent; and for the environment. capital and reserves 72 Notes to the financial statements 90 Ten-year record (unaudited) Available online % www.thecrownestate.co.uk/annual_report Other publications available 5 Scotland Report 2010 Wales Financial Highlights 2010 Northern Ireland Financial Highlights 2010 Page 2 The Crown Estate Annual Report 2010 Commercialism.
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2015 Inside This Year’S Integrated Annual Report and Accounts 2015

    Annual Report and Accounts 2015 Inside This Year’S Integrated Annual Report and Accounts 2015

    2015 Annual ReportAnnual Accounts and The Crown Estate Annual Report and Accounts 2015 Inside this year’s integrated Annual Report and Accounts 2015 Overview Building an integrated The Crown Estate is an Highlights of our performance 03 approach independent commercial Chairman’s statement 04 Chief Executive’s review 06 Three years ago we began to work towards a business, created by Act new vision, which would integrate sustainability Our business at a glance 10 across our business. In order to communicate of Parliament. this we produced our first integrated report Our role is to make sure that the land and What we’ve been doing and set out a three-year plan to improve our property we invest in and manage are Review of activities 12 approach. sustainably worked, developed and enjoyed to deliver the best value over the long term. At the In the first year we outlined our business heart of how we work is an astute, considered, Our markets model and identified the material issues that collaborative approach that helps us create Our markets 34 impact our performance. In the second year success for our business and for those we looked more deeply at our markets and we work with. How we create value improved our understanding of the resources and relationships that sustain our business Business model 38 Our vision is to be a progressive commercial and contribute to our success. In this, our business creating significant value beyond Resources and relationships 40 third integrated report, we have focused on financial return. We will work with partners What is Total Contribution? 42 developing robust measurement indicators and stakeholders to grow our business, Strategic objectives 44 and exploring the broader impact of what we outperforming the market whilst delivering do and how we can inspire change.
  • Site Allocations Plan: Emerging Preferred Options, October 2015

    Site Allocations Plan: Emerging Preferred Options, October 2015

    Development Plans Site Allocations Plan Emerging Preferred Options Consultation October 2015 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning-policy Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 What is the purpose of this consultation? 4 3 Site Allocations Plan so far 5 4 Land supply requirement 6 5 The sites 8 6 The assessment process 11 7 Determining preferred options 14 8 Sustainability Appraisal and other evidence 16 Appendix A - List of sites and maps 17 Appendix B - Revised assessment framework 69 Appendix C - Employment Land Study site rankings 75 Appendix D - Surgery capacity 77 Appendix E - Site assessment summary and rankings 79 Options, referred P Emerging Plan: Allocations Site | Council 2015 Keynes Milton October 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 All Local Planning Authorities have a duty to allocate sufficient land to enable homes to be built to satisfy local housing need. Milton Keynes Council established in its Core Strategy a target of delivering 28,000 homes in the period from 2010 to 2026; an average of 1,750 homes per year. This target is split 26,240 in the urban area and 1,760 across the rural rest of the Borough. 1.2 There is a need to ensure that there is choice and flexibility in land supply across the Borough. This will help maintain completion rates and enable the Council to demonstrate it has a five year supply of land, which is a strict government requirement. Problems with this can arise because, despite there being enough land available, it is not being built out quickly enough to meet the Core Strategy’s annual housing targets.
  • Property Useful Links

    Property Useful Links

    PROPERTY - USEFUL LINKS Property - Useful Links 1300 Home Loan 1810 Malvern Road 1Casa 1st Action 1st Choice Property 1st Property Lawyers 247 Property Letting 27 Little Collins 47 Park Street 5rise 7th Heaven Properties A Place In The Sun A Plus New Homes a2dominion AACS Abacus Abbotsley Country Homes AboutProperty ABSA Access Plastics AccessIQ Accor Accord Mortgages Achieve Adair Paxton LLP Adams & Remrs Adept PROPERTY - USEFUL LINKS ADIT Brasil ADIT Nordeste Adriatic Luxury Hotels Advanced Solutions International (ASI) Affinity Sutton Affordable Millionaire Agence 107 Promenade Agency Express Ajay Ajuha Alcazaba Hills Resort Alexander Hall Alitex All Over GEO Allan Jack + Cottier Allied Pickfords Allied Surveyors AlmaVerde Amazing Retreats American Property Agent Amsprop Andalucia Country Houses Andermatt Swiss Alps Andrew and Ashwell Anglo Pacific World Movers Aphrodite Hills Apmasphere Apparent Properties Ltd Appledore Developments Ltd Archant Life Archant Life France PROPERTY - USEFUL LINKS Architectural Association School Of Architecture AREC Aristo Developers ARUP asbec Askon Estates UK Limited Aspasia Aspect International Aspinall Group Asprey Homes Asset Agents Asset Property Brokers Assetz Assoc of Home Information Pack Providers (AHIPP) Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) Assoufid Aston Lloyd Astute ATHOC Atisreal Atlas International Atum Cove Australand Australian Dream Homes Awesome Villas AXA Azure Investment Property Baan Mandala Villas And Condominiums Badge Balcony Systems PROPERTY - USEFUL LINKS Ballymore
  • Final Prospectus Intro(A)

    Final Prospectus Intro(A)

    THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to what action you should take, you are recommended to seek your own financial advice from your stockbroker, bank LR13.3.1(4) manager, solicitor, accountant or other appropriate independent financial adviser duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended) (“FSMA”) if you are resident in the United Kingdom or, if not, another appropriately authorised independent financial adviser. If you sell or have sold or otherwise transferred all of your Existing Ordinary Shares prior to the date the shares are traded “ex” LR13.3.1(6) the entitlement to the Open Offer, you should send this document, and if relevant, the accompanying Application Form and the enclosed Form of Proxy (and reply-paid envelope) at once to the purchaser or transferee or to the bank, stockbroker or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee. If you have sold or transferred any part of your registered holding of Existing Ordinary Shares, please contact your stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected immediately and refer to the instructions regarding split applications set out in the Application Form, if relevant. However, no Application Form should be forwarded to or transmitted in or into the United States or any Excluded Territories where doing so may constitute a violation of local securities laws. Please refer to paragraph 7 of Part 2 of this document if you propose to send this document and/or the Application Form outside the United Kingdom.
  • MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development

    MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development

    October 2016 Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas FINAL Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas 1 St John’s Square Final Report London, EC1M 4DH T: +44 (0)207 253 2929 Prepared by Gillespies LLP F: +44 (0)207 253 3900 October 2016 www.gillespies.co.uk Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Identification of Development Model and Landscape Attributes 8 4 Susceptibility Criteria 8 5 Assessment of Landscape Sensitivity to Residential Development 10 6 Landscape Assessments 11 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is currently developing 1.1.3 The main aims of this study are; a new Local Plan. Planning to meet housing need will be a key part of Plan:MK. This is to comply with the requirement in the To assess the sensitivity of the 30 landscape areas around National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Paragraph 14) that Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell, Woburn Sands and Olney to residential development Local Plans should met objectively-assessed needs unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably To identify where particular land areas may have greater or outweigh the benefits, or that specific policies in the NPPF indicate less capacity for residential development that development should be restricted. In assessing potential site options, the NPPF states that ‘allocations of land for development should prefer land of less environmental value’ (Paragraph 17). The Local Plan should bring forward allocations which are consistent with these various requirements.
  • Local Allocations Masterplans Consultation Report Part 1

    Local Allocations Masterplans Consultation Report Part 1

    Local Allocations Masterplans Consultation Report Part 1 November 2015 Consultation Report This Consultation Report outlines the steps taken in preparing the masterplans for the Local Allocations designated in the Site Allocations Development Plan Document. It covers the nature of the consultations carried out, the means of publicity employed, the main issues arising and how these influenced the final documents. Obtaining this information in other formats: If you would like this information in any other language, please contact us. If you would like this information in another format, such as large print or audiotape, please contact us at [email protected] or 01442 228660. CONTENTS PART 1: Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. The Council’s Approach 3 3. Notification and Publicity 5 4. Results 7 5. Summary of the Main Issues 8 6. Changes Proposed 20 ANNEX A: METHOD OF NOTIFICATION 22 Appendices: Appendix 1: Advertisements and Press Articles 23 Appendix 2: Dacorum Digest articles 31 Appendix 3: Example of Display Material for Exhibitions 34 Appendix 4: Organisations and Individuals Contacted 40 Appendix 5: Sample Notification Letters 53 Appendix 6: Cabinet Report (July 2014) 58 Appendix 7: Minutes of Key Meetings 73 Appendix 8: Cabinet Report (October 2015) 81 PART 2: RESULTS (see separate document) Table 1 – List of Groups / Individuals from whom Representations 4 were received Table 2 – Breakdown of comments received 18 Table 3 - Main Issues raised and Council’s Response 19 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Core Strategy for Dacorum Borough was found sound in 2013 and formally adopted on 25 September 2013. The Site Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) is the second part of the new emerging Local Plan and forms part of the Local Planning Framework (LPF) for Dacorum.
  • CAMPBELL PARK, MILTON KEYNES AMENDED August 2018

    CAMPBELL PARK, MILTON KEYNES AMENDED August 2018

    Understanding Historic Parks and Gardens in Buckinghamshire The Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust Research & Recording Project CAMPBELL PARK, MILTON KEYNES AMENDED August 2018 The Stanley Smith (UK) Horticultural Trust Bucks Gardens Trust HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY NB the south-west corner of Campbell Park (the environs of Marlborough Street) overlaps with part of the north-east corner of Central Milton Keynes (qv). Bucks Gardens Trust, Site Dossier: Campbell Park, Milton Keynes, MKC A 2018 NB the south-west corner of Campbell Park (the environs of Marlborough Street) overlaps with part of the north-east corner of Central Milton Keynes (qv). 2 INTRODUCTION Background to the Project This site dossier has been prepared as part of The Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust (BGT) Research and Recording Project, begun in 2014. This site is one of several hundred designed landscapes county-wide identified by Bucks County Council (BCC) in 1998 (including Milton Keynes District) as potentially retaining evidence of historic interest, as part of the Historic Parks and Gardens Register Review project carried out for English Heritage (now Historic England) (BCC Report No. 508). The list is not definitive and further parks and gardens may be identified as research continues or further information comes to light. Content BGT has taken the Register Review list as a sound basis from which to select sites for appraisal as part of its Research and Recording Project for designed landscapes in the historic county of Bucks (pre-1974 boundaries). For each site a dossier is prepared by volunteers trained on behalf of BGT by experts in appraising designed landscapes who have worked extensively for English Heritage/Historic England on its Register Upgrade Project.
  • What Do YOU Think?

    What Do YOU Think?

    Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Consultation December 2020 What do YOU think? Contents Letter from the Steering Group Page 1 What You Told Us Page 3 Policy Intents Page 7 Design and Energy Efficiency Page 8 Non-designated Heritage Assets Page 9 Important Views Page 10 Designated Local Green Spaces Page 13 Green and Blue Infrastructure Network Page 14 Footpaths and Bridleways Page 16 Cycleways Page 18 Community Facilities Page 19 Traffic Page 20 Economy, Employment and Agriculture Page 20 Site Assessment Page 21 Questionnaire – insert Photo credit: Thank you to Laura Boddington who supplied most of the photographs. Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and Haversham-cum-Little-Linford Parish Council have been working for a considerable time to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish. We have been assisted in this by Oneill Homer, a leading consultancy who have assisted Parish and Town Councils around the country to produce well over 100 Neighbourhood Plans, including several in Milton Keynes. The cost of this consultancy work has been paid for by a government grant. What is a Neighbourhood Plan? A document that sets out planning policies for the neighbourhood area – planning policies are used to decide whether to approve planning applications. Written by the local community, the people who know and love the area, rather than the Local Planning Authority. A powerful tool to ensure the community gets the right types of development, in the right place. What is this document for? We had hoped to hold a public meeting / exhibition to discuss the significant work undertaken so far and find out YOUR views of our policy intents and the potential development sites offered by landowners.
  • Al MILTON KEYNES EXPANSION STUDY Land West of Willen Road

    Al MILTON KEYNES EXPANSION STUDY Land West of Willen Road

    Al MILTON KEYNES EXPANSION STUDY Land West of Willen Road, Newport Pagnell, Buckinghamshire Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Summary Report January 1999 Resource Planning Team RPT Job Number: 0304/008/99 Eastern Region MAFF Reference: EL03/0162I FRCA Reading AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT MILTON KEYNES EXPANSION STUDY LAND WEST OF WILLEN ROAD, NEWPORT PAGNELL, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE INTRODUCTION 1. This report presents the findings of a detailed Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) survey of approximately 27 ha of land lo the west of Willen Road (adjacent to the Ml motorway), on the southem fringe of Newport Pagnell in Buckinghamshire. The survey was carried out during January 1999. 2. The fieldwork was undertaken by the Farming and Rural Conservation Agency (FRCA)' on behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). It was carried out in connection with MAFF's statutory input to the Milton Keynes Expansion Study. This survey supersedes any previous ALC information for this land. 3. The work was conducted by members of the Resource Planning Team in the Eastem Region of FRCA. The land has been graded in accordance with the published MAFF ALC guidelines and criteria (MAFF, 1988). A description of the ALC grades and subgrades is given in Appendix I. 4. At the time of survey all of the land was in an agricultural use and comprised grassland (both permanent and ley), cereal stubble and land in a Set-aside use. SUMMARY 5. The findings of the survey are shown on the enclosed ALC map. The map has been drawn at a scale of 1:10,000.
  • Public Notice

    Public Notice

    PUBLIC NOTICE THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MILTON KEYNES (WOLVERTON ROAD, NEWPORT PAGNELL) (TEMPORARY CLOSURE) ORDER 2021 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes has on 8th June 2021 made the above Order under Section 14(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The effect of the above-named Order will be to temporarily prohibit vehicles from entering, waiting or proceeding along Wolverton Road, Newport Pagnell (at the M1 bridge) between Little Linford Lane roundabout and Giffard Park Roundabout. in order to enable Highways England to carry out the following essential works as part of the ‘M1 T3 smart motorway’ project: (1) Installation of temporary protection above the road, (2) Installation of environmental barrier panels to the bridge parapets, (3) Removal of the temporary protection above the road and in the interest of public safety. The affected length of road will be closed between the hours of 9:30am and 4:30pm every day (Monday to Friday) between 14th June 2021 and 9th July 2021. The road will be re-opened to the public during the hours of 4:30pm and 9:30am (Monday – Friday) and fully opened at weekends. Alternative routes (whilst Wolverton Road is closed): Motorists: The alternative route will be via Brickhill Street (V10), Monks Way (H3) and Marsh End Road (Vice Versa). Pedestrians: Access for pedestrians will be maintained throughout the closure via a Banksman on site For information on any affected bus service please visit the Council website at: https://www.milton- keynes.gov.uk/highways-and-transport-hub/bus-and-taxi/bus-service-disruptions-and-diversions.
  • Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire

    Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire

    Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire Archaeological Watching Brief for The Parks Trust CA Project: 660924 Site Code: GLM17 CA Report: 17554 HER Ref: EMK1317 October 2017 Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire Archaeological Watching Brief CA Project: 660924 Site Code: GLM17 HER Ref: EMK1317 CA Report: 17554 Document Control Grid Revision Date Author Checked by Status Reasons for Approved revision by A 6/9/17 SB and AKM JN Draft Internal review B 10/10/17 AKM PB Draft Internal review MLC This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology © Cotswold Archaeology Great Linford Manor Park, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire: Archaeological Watching Brief CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 5 4. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 6 5. RESULTS (FIG.