DOCSLIB.ORG

Athenian Maritime Leagues 20 June 2019 Chad Uhl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Athenian Maritime Leagues 20 June 2019 Chad Uhl 1st Athenian League (The Delian League) 478-404 BCE 499 BCE Athenians move 1st Fortifications of treasury to Athens (?) Piraeus Constructed 454 BCE Treaty of Callias 493-480 BCE 449 BCE Persian Wars Peloponnesian War c.499-449 BCE 430-404 BCE Long Walls Constructed 465-446 BCE First Athenian League (Delian League) 478-404 BCE Treasury Built Battle of Plataea at Delphi 479 BCE 490 BCE 404 BCE Overview pre-existing religious network centered on the cult of Apollo at Delos. • Simply called symmachia by ancients. • Athens begins to lay the groundwork in the • Founded in 478 BCE in order to liberate the 6th c. when Peisistratus ‘cleanses’ part of the eastern Greek city-states from Persian rule. island in the 540s and builds a large monument • Led by Athens and aimed at defending against (porinos naos) from Athenian limestone. future Persian retribution/aggression. • Athens also began to claim itself as the mother- • Made up of over 300 city-states. city of all Ionia (Solon)—propaganda which continues into the 5th century. • Athens became increasingly aggressive and demanded tribute in money, ships, or • Both Naxos and Samos attempted similar materials—creating the Athenian Empire. interventions in the Aegean, but neither of the three had the means to assert control over the • The league made some impressive region. accomplishments: • Two interpretations of Athens’ moving of the • Ridding the Aegean of piracy. league’s treasury: • Establishing standard measurements and • Gomme argues that this marked a shift a standard coinage. away from the former political narrative • Centralizing taxation. which placed Athens as the mother-city of Ionia • Making accessible the judiciary of Athens. • Constantakopoulou disagrees since • Increasing inter-city trade. Athens sustained that propaganda and was actually co-opting Delos’ former role From League to Empire as the center of the Aegean religious and • Scholars disagree on when the 1st Athenian cultural network. league changes into an empire, but there are • Athens takes over authority at the sanctuary on two common dates: Delos, instituting the amphiktiones and forces • c.454 BCE - League Treasury moved from another purification of the island, at one point Delos to Athens. even expelling the Delians themselves • 446 BCE - Long Walls are constructed • Triremes need a safe place to rest every 4 hours connecting Piraeus to Athens. or so, which makes the Aegean ideal but, on the other hand, makes long voyages in regions • Athens built the league and its empire from the with few islands nearly impossible (e.g. Crete) • Whoever controlled the sea, controlled the εἰ μὲν ⟨οὖν⟩ ταύτην σὺ τὴν θάλατταν islands. Whoever controlled the islands could ἀποδώσεις ἑκων, εἰ δὲ μη, ⟨τὰ⟩ πάντα ταῦτα maintain their rule over the entire region. συντριαινῶν ἀπολέσω. • According to the Tribute Lists, the island states Thucydides only made up roughly 1/3 of the league. • In Thucydides’ mind, Athens had a natural • Sources focus on the islands and intertwine claim to all islands. For him, islands even them with conceptions of naval power: become a substitute for subject-allies. Herodotus • Thucydides articulates through Cleon’s speech at 3.39.2, it is understandable for • Links the islanders (nesiotes) with the idea some cities to revolt against Athenian of subject-allies as he relates the story of hegemony, but islands revolting is totally Themistocles during the Persian Wars unacceptable. • He also describes the islands and the Hellespont as ‘prizes’ (aethla) for winning League Members the battle of Mycale (9.101.3) • The largest number of members recorded on Aristophanes extant tribute tablets name 330 city-states • Demosthenes tells the sausage-seller to: • Tablets are known to be incomplete “look at the islands all around.” • Many of these cities are Ionian, but all κάτιδε τὰς νήσους ἁπάσας ἐν κύκλῳ (170). regions of the Greek world seem to be represented • There are also 2 lost comedies by Aristophanes and Plato which focus on • Members were expected to pay tribute (phoros) Athenian sea-power and the islands. to the treasury in order to fund the building and maintenance of ships for the fleet maintained • KA F24: Poseidon threatens the Spartans. by Athens. “If, therefore, you readily give away this sea, or • Revolts by Naxos and Thasos provide good even if you don’t, I, brandishing my trident, will examples of growing discontent in the latter destroy all these things.” periods of the Athenian Empire. 2nd Athenian League 378-338 BCE 395 BCE Peace of Antalcidas 387 BCE The Social War 357-355 BCE Corinthian War Boeotian War 395-387 BCE 378-371 BCE Second Athenian League 378-338 BCE Decree of Aristoteles & Long Walls Rebuilt 394-391 BCE Invasion of the Piraeus 378 BCE 338 BCE Overview • The Piraeus served as the hub for this trade network and was thus the most important • After the Peloponnesian War, Sparta takes over factor in establishing the second Athenian the former Athenian Empire, enforcing its own league. hegemony over the Greek world. • Growing tension between Thebes and Sparta • Sparta orders that : prompted the Spartans to invade the Piraeus in • Athenian walls and fortifications be the winter of 378 BCE. destroyed • Sources disagree on whether this • Athens let all former exiles return was by the order of the Spartan king Cleombrotus or a Theban plot to bring • The Athenian fleet be reduced to 12 ships Athens to their side. • Persia backs the Corinthian War (395-387 BCE) • Athens made alliances with several which essentially pitted Argos, Athens, Corinth, Aegean cities: Byzantium, Chios, Rhodes, and Thebes against the Spartans. and Mytilene. • During this time, Konon used Persian subsidies to rebuild the Long Walls (394-391 BCE). The Decree of Aristoteles • Thrasybulus restrengthened relationships with • Decree passed in 378 BCE and inscribed on a the Hellespont in order to secure the grain stele placed in the Stoa of Zeus near the statue trade for Athens. of Zeus Eleutherios. • Corinthian War resolved by the ‘Peace • Formally launched the league, named of Antalcidas’ in 387 BCE (preserved by members, and outlined the terms. Xenophon): • Inscribed by 3 different hands and contains • Persia gets all Greek cities on Asia Minor several areas that seem to have been erased or and Cyprus that do not survive. • Athens gets Lemnos, Scyros, and Imbros • Primary source of evidence aside from • The rest should be autonomous Xenophon and Diodorus. • Athens’ acquisition of these islands allowed it • Placed limits on Athenian power: e.g. Athenians to begin rebuilding its naval power. It became were not allowed to own property in allied the center of the grain trade for the Aegean states. (Burke). • It also promised autonomy and no required • While the first league seems to be centered on tributes for members, which stood in stark imperialism and military control, the second opposition to the setup of the first Athenian league was focused on maritime commerce. League. • League members were required to make a The End of the League contribution (suntaxis), however, for the costs of the league’s navy. • The Social War begins c. 357 BCE when Chios, Rhodes, Cos, and Byzantium rebel against • Focused on defending members from the Athenian hegemony. influences of Sparta and developing a trade network. • Philip II captures Amphipolis (gold, silver, and timber) securing Macedonia’s future. • Thebes joined only because defeating Sparta was a primary objective of the league in its • League dwindles afterwards and is eventually initial stage. formally disbanded by Philip II in 338 BCE. • Some allies seceded from the league • Athens largely bankrupt after the Social War successfully while others were forcefully and in no place to enforce hegemony over restored. members of the league or even the Aegean. Bibliography Monographs: Bonnin, G. 2015. De Naxos à Amorgos: L’impérialisme athénien vu des Cyclades à l’époque classique. Bordeaux. Cargill, J. 1981. The Second Athenian League: Empire or Free Alliance?. Berkeley. Constantakopoulos, C. The Dance of the Islands: Insularity, Networks, the Athenian Empire, and the Aegean World. Oxford. Lowe, P. (ed.). 2008. The Athenian Empire. Edinburgh. Meiggs, R. 1972. The Athenian Empire. Oxford. Articles, Chapters, & Theses: Baron, C.A. 2006. “The Aristoteles Decree and the Expansion of the Second Athenian League.” Hesperia 75(3): 379-95. Burke, E.M. 1990. “Athens after the Peloponnesian War: Restoration Efforts and the Role of Maritime Commerce.” Classical Antiquity 9(1): 1-13. Cawkwell, G.L. 1984. “Athenian Naval Power in the Fourth Century.” Classical Quarterly 34(2): 334-45. _______. 1981. “Notes on the Failure of the Second Athenian Confederacy.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 40-55. Charles, J.F. 1946. “The Anatomy of Athenian Sea Power.” The Classical Journal 42(2): 86-91. MacFarline, M. 2016. The Second Athenian League: An Alliance Crippled by Institutional Stagnation. Master’s Thesis: Brandeis University..
Recommended publications
  • The Aristoteles Decree and the Expansion of the Second Athenian

    The Aristoteles Decree and the Expansion of the Second Athenian

    HESPERIA 75 (2006) THE ARISTOTELES Pages 379-395 DECREE AND THE EXPANSION OF THE SECOND ATHENIAN LEAGUE ABSTRACT The left lateral face of the Aristoteles Decree stele {IG IP 43), the most impor numerous tant epigraphic source for the Second Athenian League, presents problems of interpretation. The author attempts here to establish the order in were on which members of the League listed that face and to link them with a campaigns described in the literary sources, offering possible restoration for the name inscribed in line 111 and later erased. A contemporary inscription from Athens points to the Parians, who were also listed on the front of the stone. the erasure was intended to correct a mistake of Thus, repetition. our The stele of the Aristoteles Decree (Fig. 1) is principal epigraphic evi dence for the Second Athenian League, and since its discovery and initial more a on publication than 150 years ago it has shed great deal of light the affairs of Athens and Greece during the first half of the 4th century b.c.1 It has also raised many questions, both epigraphic and historical, especially names with regard to the specific of members and their dates of entry into the League. Both the stone and the organization whose existence it records over have received intense scholarly scrutiny the years.2 In this article I on names focus the of member city-states, leagues, and individuals that appear on the left lateral face of the stone (lines 97-134), both to establish the order in which the names were inscribed and to attempt to link the campaigns of Athenian generals recorded in the literature with the ap names on a to pearance of the stele.
  • Artaxerxes II

    Artaxerxes II

    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
  • Lecture 8 Alexander WC 107-122 PP 138-144: Aristotle, Politics and Plutarch on Alex

    Lecture 8 Alexander WC 107-122 PP 138-144: Aristotle, Politics and Plutarch on Alex

    Lecture 8 Alexander WC 107-122 PP 138-144: Aristotle, Politics and Plutarch on Alex Chronology: 404 Defeat of Athens in Peloponnesian War 334 Alexander invades Persia Sparta becomes dominant polis 333 Battle of Issus inflation throughout Greece 332 Alexander deifies himself at Siwa in Egypt 395-387 Corinthian War Alex personally outlines Alexandria 371 Battle of Leuctra 331 Battle of Gaugamela Thebes becomes dominant 330 Alex occupies Persepolis 359-336 Reign of Philip II of Macedon 326 Battle of Hydaspes River 336 Alexander assumes the throne (farthest extent of conquest) 324 Alex returns of Babylon 323 Alexander the Great dies wars between the Successors breaks out Star Terms: Geog. Terms: Phillip II Macedonia Alexander the Great Persian Empire Aristotle Hindu Kush A. Battle of Issus (Pompeii), Roman mosaic of a of ca. 310 BCE Greek painting Tactics of Alexander; Roman ability with tessera; their love of Alexander’s heroism and stories; http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Battle_of_Issus_roman_mosaic_from_Pompei.jpg Lecture 8 Alexander B. Demosthenes, Roman copy after a bronze original of c. 280 BCE, marble using art to capture a likeness and personality/ Demosthenes/ realistic depiction vs. an idealized one This statue was one of several Athenian heroes opposed to the Macedonian rule of Athens that was set up in the agora, or marketplace, of the city. Demosthenes was forced by the Macedonians to flee Athens. When he reached the island of Poros, he drank poison rather than submit to the enemy. An inscription on the base of the sculpture reads: ‘If your strength had equaled your resolution, Demosthenes, the Macedonian Ares [i.e.
  • Athenian 'Imperialism' in the Aegean Sea in the 4Th Century BCE: The

    Athenian 'Imperialism' in the Aegean Sea in the 4Th Century BCE: The

    ELECTRUM * Vol. 27 (2020): 117–130 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.20.006.12796 www.ejournals.eu/electrum Athenian ‘Imperialism’ in the Aegean Sea in the 4th Century BCE: The Case of Keos* Wojciech Duszyński http:/orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-039X Jagiellonian University in Kraków Abstract: This article concerns the degree of direct involvement in the Athenian foreign policy in the 4th century BC. One of main questions debated by scholars is whether the Second Athe- nian Sea League was gradually evolving into an arche, to eventually resemble the league of the previous century. The following text contributes to the scholarly debate through a case study of relations between Athens and poleis on the island of Keos in 360s. Despite its small size, Keos included four settlements having the status of polis: Karthaia, Poiessa, Koresia and Ioulis, all members of the Second Athenian League. Around year 363/2 (according to the Attic calendar), anti-Athenian riots, usually described as revolts, erupted on Keos, to be quickly quelled by the strategos Chabrias. It is commonly assumed that the Athenians used the uprising to interfere di- rectly in internal affairs on the island, enforcing the dissolution of the local federation of poleis. However, my analysis of selected sources suggests that such an interpretation cannot be readily defended: in fact, the federation on Keos could have broken up earlier, possibly without any ex- ternal intervention. In result, it appears that the Athenians did not interfere in the local affairs to such a degree as it is often accepted. Keywords: Athens, Keos, Koresia, Karthaia, Poiessa, Ioulis, Aegean, 4th century BC, Second Athenian League, Imperialism.
  • Lecture 17 Spartan Hegemony and the Persian Hydra

    Lecture 17 Spartan Hegemony and the Persian Hydra

    3/15/2012 Lecture 17 Spartan Hegemony and the Persian Hydra HIST 332 Spring 2012 The Aftermath of the Peloponnesian War • General – Greece in a state of economic and demographic devastation; proliferation of mercenaries. • Athens - starved into submission: – Demolish the Long Walls – Surrender all ships except 12 – Accept the lead of Sparta – An oligarchic government by 30 men is put in place by Lysander – Democracy is abolished • Rule of the Thirty Tyrants • Ionian Greeks – Under Persian control. • Sparta –hegemon of Greece; – imposes harmosts & garrisons on defeated cities – allied to the Persians. 4th century Greece Period of continuous warfare • The Corinthian War (394-386 BCE). • Thebes and Sparta (377-362 BCE). • The Social War (357-355 BCE). • The hegemony of Macedon. 1 3/15/2012 Spartan general Lysander Probably of noble descent but impoverished • Lover of prince Agesilaos • Ambitious and Un-Spartan in some ways: – understood way to defeat Athens was to create a navy – He created a bond with the Persian prince Cyrus, son of king Darius II • funded the Spartan fleet • Power-hungry – not enough to stage open revolt against the Spartan constitution Agesilaos II (401-360) A towering figure in Spartan history • Eurypontid king when Sparta ruled Greek world – Half-brother of king Agis II • Very popular among the men in the army, very influential – He had undergone the agoge despite his lame leg – hated Thebes • influenced many wrong decisions – largely responsible for the decline of Spartan power – impoverish the Spartan treasury •
  • Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective

    Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective Nicholas D. Cross The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1479 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INTERSTATE ALLIANCES IN THE FOURTH-CENTURY BCE GREEK WORLD: A SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE by Nicholas D. Cross A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 Nicholas D. Cross All Rights Reserved ii Interstate Alliances in the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________ __________________________________________ Date Jennifer Roberts Chair of Examining Committee ______________ __________________________________________ Date Helena Rosenblatt Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Joel Allen Liv Yarrow THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross Adviser: Professor Jennifer Roberts This dissertation offers a reassessment of interstate alliances (συµµαχία) in the fourth-century BCE Greek world from a socio-cultural perspective.
  • War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History

    War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History

    War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History edited by Philip de Souza and John France CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521817035 © Cambridge University Press 2008 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in print format 2008 ISBN-13 978-0-511-38080-8 eBook (Adobe Reader) ISBN-13 978-0-521-81703-5 hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Contents List of contributors page vii Acknowledgements ix Note on abbreviations xi 1 Introduction Philip de Souza and John France 1 2 Making and breaking treaties in the Greek world P. J. Rhodes 6 3 War, peace and diplomacy in Graeco-Persian relations from the sixth to the fourth century BC Eduard Rung 28 4 Treaties, allies and the Roman conquest of Italy J. W. Rich 51 5 Parta victoriis pax: Roman emperors as peacemakers Philip de Souza 76 6 Treaty-making in Late Antiquity A. D.
  • 1 HIST3105 War and Society in Ancient Greece, 750-350 BC This

    1 HIST3105 War and Society in Ancient Greece, 750-350 BC This

    HIST3105 War and Society in Ancient Greece, 750-350 BC This course investigates all aspects of war in its social context in archaic and classical Greece – from the causes of conflict, via the question of how to train, raise, maintain, and control citizen and mercenary armies, to the range of forms of warfare from ritual clashes to campaigns of annihilation. In particular, the course tackles some of the myths current in modern scholarship: the notions that war was the ‘normal’ state of international relations in Greece; that the citizen army was an essentially ‘middle-class’ body; that warfare was restricted to a game-like competition in the archaic period and became a destructive ‘total’ conlict only in the classical period; that the Athenian navy drove the development of radical democracy; and that the ‘mercenary explosion’ of the fourth century was a result of economic and political crisis in the Greek city-states. How the Greeks fought has been much-debated in recent research, and this too will be the subject of detailed study. A crucial aim of the course is to provide an understanding of how Greek warfare was shaped by the social, economic, and cultural constraints of its time, how it developed, and why wars were so common in ancient Greece. Our main sources are long narrative accounts of wars which cannot be divided up into thematic sections corresponding to the main topics set out above: a single paragraph of Thucydides or Xenophon will contain information on several different topics. One of the challenges of studying Greek warfare is to assemble such disparate bits of evidence from a variety of passages and sources while still paying due attention to the context in which this material appears.
  • STRATEGIES of UNITY WITHIN the ACHAEAN LEAGUE By

    STRATEGIES of UNITY WITHIN the ACHAEAN LEAGUE By

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library STRATEGIES OF UNITY WITHIN THE ACHAEAN LEAGUE by Andrew James Hillen A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History The University of Utah December 2012 Copyright © Andrew James Hillen 2012 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Andrew James Hillen has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: W. Lindsay Adams , Chair June 26, 2012 Date Approved Ronald Smelser , Member June 26, 2012 Date Approved Alexis Christensen , Member June 26, 2012 Date Approved and by Isabel Moreira , Chair of the Department of History and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The Achaean League successfully extended its membership to poleis who did not traditionally share any affinity with the Achaean ethnos. This occurred, against the current of traditional Greek political development, due to a fundamental restructuring of political power within the poleis of the Peloponnesus. Due to Hellenistic, and particularly Macedonian intervention, most Peloponnesian poleis were directed by tyrants who could make decisions based on their sole judgments. The Achaean League positioned itself to directly influence those tyrants. The League offered to maintain the tyrants within their poleis so long as they joined the League, or these tyrants faced relentless Achaean attacks and assassination attempts. Through the consent of this small tyrannical elite, the Achaean League grew to encompass most of the Peloponnesus.
  • CU Classics Graduate Handbook

    CU Classics Graduate Handbook

    Graduate Handbook (CU Boulder, Classics) 1 Graduate Handbook University of Colorado Boulder Department of Classics Last updated: October 2018; minor corrections September 2020 Graduate Handbook (CU Boulder, Classics) 2 Contents Graduate Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4 M.A. Tracks.................................................................................................................................. 4 Ph.D. Track .................................................................................................................................. 4 Graduate Degrees in Classics .......................................................................................................... 5 Graduate Degrees and Requirements ........................................................................................ 5 Doctor of Philosophy in Classics ................................................................................................. 6 M.A. in Classics, with Concentration in Greek or Latin ............................................................... 8 M.A. in Classics, with Concentration in Classical Antiquity ........................................................ 9 M.A. in Classics, with Concentration in Classical Art and Archaeology .................................... 11 M.A. in Classics, with Concentration in the Teaching of Latin .................................................. 12 Ph.D. Requirements .....................................................................................................................