DOCSLIB.ORG

Batteries/ESS(Overweight/Maintain)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

September 2, 2020 Batteries/ESS (Overweight/Maintain) Key to the green energy revolution Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. Yeon-ju Park [email protected] Chuljoong Kim [email protected] Youngbae Kwon, CFA [email protected] Analysts who prepared this report are registered as research analysts in Korea but not in any other jurisdiction, including the US. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS IN APPENDIX 1 AT THE END OF REPORT. September 2, 2020 Batteries/ESS CONTENTS I. Investment summary 3 ESS are key to the green energy revolution 3 II. US: Past the inflection point 4 1. ESS adoption in California 4 2. Increase in utility-scale energy storage projects 6 3. Grid parity and ESS demand growth 7 4. Economic feasibility 9 5. Strong demand prospects in the US 11 III. ESS are key to the green energy revolution 12 1. Global ESS market to grow seven-fold through 2025 12 2. Falling battery costs to accelerate ESS market growth from 2023 13 Ⅳ. Investment strategy 14 Top-tier battery makers to benefit: Higher valuations for ESS businesses 14 Key recommendations 16 LG Chem 17 Samsung SDI 25 CATL 29 Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 2 September 2, 2020 Batteries/ESS I. Investment summary ESS are key to the green energy revolution; battery market is undervalued despite high margins and strong growth potential Late last year, the California Public Utilities Commission called on power providers to secure 3.3GW in new clean energy resources by 2023. In response, two major utility companies— Southern California Edison (SCE) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)—plan to install energy storage systems (ESS) with a combined battery storage capacity of 1.2GW and maximum dischargeable capacity of 4.8GWh. The capacity is expected to be in service by August 2021. These projects are huge in scale, far exceeding the US’s total ESS deployment in 2019 (523MW/1.1GWh). There are numerous advantages to ESS. Such systems are eco-friendly, have short installation periods, and help to enhance power grid/power supply stability in regions with a high share of renewable resources in the power generation mix (such as California). Most of all, ESS power generation costs have declined over the past two years to the point where ESS are competitive enough to replace gas peaking power plants, which are high-cost, low-efficiency facilities that run only when there is high demand for electricity. Consensus estimates for the US ESS market are being revised up, despite COVID-19. Market researcher Wood Mackenzie projects US ESS demand to increase sharply from 523MW in 2019 to 1.5GW in 2020, 3.6GW in 2021, and 7GW in 2025. And actual ESS demand may grow more rapidly than expected. We estimate solar-plus-storage projects alone will reach 7.5GW in 2025, and ESS solutions stand a strong chance of replacing peaking power plants. Of note, the massive power shortage that hit California in August is likely to accelerate the ESS market’s expansion. We expect the global ESS market to expand more than seven-fold to 90GWh in 2025 (from 12GWh in 2020). As the US market illustrates, an increasing share of renewable sources in the power generation mix should spur higher ESS demand to ensure the stability of the electricity grid and power supply. In addition, we foresee ESS battery prices declining further around 2023 (aided by technological innovation), which should cause ESS demand growth to accelerate. Like the electric vehicle (EV) battery market, the fast-growing ESS battery market is likely to be led by top-tier companies. Accordingly, we revise up the value of battery companies’ ESS businesses and maintain LG Chem, Samsung SDI, and CATL as our top picks. We forecast global demand for ESS-use lithium-ion batteries to expand seven-fold to 90GWh in 2025 (from 12GWh in 2020). Given that ESS demand in the US is set to expand rapidly over the next two to three years, battery sales to the US may exceed market expectations. We expect the ESS-use battery market to be highly concentrated, similar to the EV battery market. In addition, margins are likely to be high relative to EV battery margins. Given the conservative nature of the power generation market, we expect batteries with proven track records to be favored over low-priced batteries. In addition, we do not anticipate high price- cutting pressure, as ESS batteries account for just a fraction of total power system costs (whereas EV batteries account for 30-40% of EV costs). In the medium/long term, winners in the EV battery market are well positioned to extend their leadership to the ESS battery market. We maintain our positive view on global top-tier battery companies, despite recent share rallies. The EV battery market is likely to outperform expectations in terms of growth and margins. Although there are concerns ahead of Tesla’s (TSLA US/CP: US$475.05) Battery Day, we note that Tesla’s innovations have always been a boon to EV battery companies in the past. Moreover, the expansion of the global ESS market should bolster battery companies’ top and bottom lines. We lift our target price on LG Chem by 35% to W1,050,000 and maintain our target prices of W690,000 for Samsung SDI and CNY270 for CATL. Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 3 September 2, 2020 Batteries/ESS II. US: Past the inflection point 1. ESS adoption in California In the US, SCE and PG&E are taking the lead in ESS adoption. SCE is planning to install 770MW/3GWh of battery energy storage by Aug. 2021, while PG&E is set to add 423MW/1.7GWh. Taken together, these capacity plans (1.2GW/4.8GWh) are far higher than the US’s total ESS deployment in 2019 (523MW/1.1GWh; Wood Mackenzie estimates). Moreover, SCE and PG&E are planning to install total storage capacity of 1.2GW and 717MW, respectively, by 2023. SCE estimates that California will need 10GW of storage by 2030 and 30GW by 2045. Table 1. California power companies’ ESS projects Company Power capacity Energy capacity Duration Project name Developer Launch (offtaker) (MW) (MWh) (hours) SCE Blythe 2 NextEra Energy Aug. 2021 115 460 4.0 Blythe 3 NextEra Energy Aug. 2021 115 460 4.0 McCoy NextEra Energy Aug. 2021 230 920 4.0 Garland Southern Power Aug. 2021 88 352 4.0 Tranquility Southern Power Aug. 2021 72 288 4.0 Sanborn Terra-Gen Power Aug. 2021 50 200 4.0 Gateway 1-2 LS Power Aug. 2021 100 400 4.0 Total 770 3,080 PG&E Moss 100 Dynegy Marketing and Trade Aug. 2021 100 400 4.0 Blythe Energy Storage 110 NextEra Energy Aug. 2021 63 252 4.0 Diablo Energy Storage Diablo Energy Storage Aug. 2021 50 200 4.0 Diablo Energy Storage Diablo Energy Storage Aug. 2021 50 200 4.0 Diablo Energy Storage Diablo Energy Storage Aug. 2021 50 200 4.0 Gateway Energy Storage LS Power Aug. 2021 50 200 4.0 Coso Battery Storage Coso Battery Storage Aug. 2021 60 240 4.0 Total 423 1,692 Notes: Power capacity is a battery’s maximum output; energy capacity is the amount of energy stored in a battery; duration is the ratio of energy capacity to power capacity. Source: Press materials, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Figure 1. SCE to add 770MW/3GWh of ESS capacity by Aug. Figure 2. SCE estimates that California will need 10GW of ESS 2021 capacity by 2030 Source: SCE, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Source: SCE, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 4 September 2, 2020 Batteries/ESS In Nov. 2019, the California Public Utilities Commission called on power providers to secure 3.3GW in new clean energy resources by 2023 (50% by Aug. 2021), in anticipation of a major shortfall in grid capacity due to the planned closures of gas-fired power plants and the growing mix of renewables. In response, several power suppliers, including SCE, have undertaken massive-scale ESS projects. ESS facilities boast numerous advantages; for example, they are more eco-friendly than gas-fired power plants and cheaper than peaking power plants. They also have relatively short installation periods. ESS facilities also help address the “duck curve” problem—the timing mismatch between peak demand and generation—that poses challenges (e.g., grid pressure and reduced electricity quality) for renewable energy sources. In the state of California, solar/wind power accounts for 20% of total energy production. Table 2. ESS project size by company (by 2023) Company Power capacity (MW) Energy capacity (MWh) Notes SCE 1,185 4,740 770MW/3GWh by Aug. 2021 PG&E 717 2,868 423MW/1.7GWh by Aug. 2021 San Diego Gas and Electric 293 1,172 California Community Choice Association 800 3,200 Heavy PV/ESS reliance Total 2,995 11,980 Source: CPUC, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Figure 3. Energy mix of solar and wind power in California Figure 4. “Duck curve” problem exacerbates grid instability (% ) 14 Solar PV Wind 12 10 8 6 4 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source: California Energy Commission, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Source: CAISO, press materials, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 5 September 2, 2020 Batteries/ESS 2. Increase in utility-scale energy storage projects Utility-scale energy storage projects are gaining significant momentum in the Western part of the US (beyond California). According to a recent study by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (published in Jul. 2020), 28% (102GW) of solar PV capacity within interconnection queues were solar-plus- storage hybrids at end-2019.
Recommended publications

  • Opportunities Amid Crisis

    Banks Opportunities amid crisis 1Q20 preview: Lower NIMs, healthier-than-expected loan growth, and stable credit costs For 1Q20, we expect banks under our coverage—Shinhan Financial Group (SFG), KB Industry Report Financial Group (KBFG), Hana Financial Group (HFG), Industrial Bank of Korea (IBK), April 22, 2020 BNK Financial Group (BNKFG), DGB Financial Group (DGBFG), and JB Financial Group (JBFG)—to post combined net profit attributable to controlling interests of W3tr (-7.5% YoY), in line with the recently lowered consensus. Whil e we see net profit declining YoY on high base effects (due to provision reversals a year ago), we still think banks Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. performed decently amid growing concerns over the economy. We estimate bank net [Banks/Credit Cards ] interest margins (NIMs) fell 4-5bps QoQ, but we believe loa n growth was healthier than expected, as large banks’ won-denominated loans likely expanded 2.5% QoQ on Heather Kang average. We estimate credit costs increased 17% YoY, while the ratio of credit costs to +822 -3774 -1903 total credit was likely stable at 38bps (vs. 35bps in 1Q19, when reversals of provisions [email protected] were included). 2020 forecast: Net profit to decline 7%; ROE of 7.4% Concerns are growing over the potential impact of COVID-19 on banks (asset quality and credit costs) and the broader economy, as it is still unknown how long the outbreak will last and what its impact will be. Unlike previous financial crises that were triggered by large conglomerates or banks, we think the potential upcoming crisis is very likely to start from micro businesses, small merchants, and SMEs, before spreading gradually to larger enterprises.
  • Tesi Mazzenga

    Tesi Mazzenga

    Dipartimento di Impresa e Management Cattedra di Management delle Imprese Internazionali IL SETTORE AUTOMOTIVE: LE DETERMINANTI DELLA VELOCITÀ DI INTERNAZIONALIZZAZIONE NEL CONFRONTO TRA VOLVO E TESLA Prof. Antonio Majocchi Prof. Matteo Giuliano Caroli RELATORE CORRELATORE Valerio Mazzenga Matricola: 709011 CANDIDATO Anno accademico 2019/2020 1 ABSTRACT: Il seguente lavoro ha l’obiettivo di individuare i fattori che determinano l’esistenza di imprese Born Globals, imprese che, a differenza del classico modello di internazionalizzazione a stadi, si espandono all’estero molto velocemente. Diverse teorie hanno cercato di dare una spiegazione al fenomeno e il dibattito è ancora irrisolto. Il focus dell’elaborato sarà quindi il confronto tra le tre principali teorie, quella classica delle teorie IE, quella alternativa di Hennart (FSA) e quella di mediazione di Dow, cercando di riportare nuove evidenze a sostegno di una teoria piuttosto che un’altra. La metodologia di analisi utilizzata è quella del “case study” e l’analisi si concentrerà su due imprese appartenenti al settore Automotive, Volvo e Tesla; attraverso uno studio approfondito delle due imprese, dei loro modelli di business e dei manager che le guidano, si studierà l’importanza della presenza di alcuni fattori e la superfluità di altri. Considerando Volvo come esempio di impresa non-BG si evidenzieranno infatti i suoi tratti caratteristici a testimonianza di fattori non sufficienti a garantire una rapida espansione estera. Considerando invece Tesla come esempio di impresa BG, si evidenzieranno i fattori necessari. I risultati dell’analisi saranno infine paragonati alle teorie dibattute e si esprimerà la posizione presa dal seguente elaborato. 2 INDICE INTRODUZIONE…………………………………………………………………………...PAG.
  • ISSUE 84 / 2020 Freetorial He Great Thing About Being Free Car Mag Is That We Are Just MG India Brand Ambassador That, Free

    ISSUE 84 / 2020 Freetorial He Great Thing About Being Free Car Mag Is That We Are Just MG India Brand Ambassador That, Free

    Get the Look Should you buy... Communist Chinese Cars? & from companies that work within the People's Republic? We try on some ultra cool T-Shirts with a distinctly Swedish theme which might be turbocharged... freecarmag.co.uk 1 ISSUE 84 / 2020 freetorial He great tHing about being Free Car Mag is tHat we are just MG India brand ambassador that, free. Free to write about what we please. Difcult things. T I was ratHer interested in wHat car manufacturers tHougHt Benedict Cumberbatch about operating in CHina. Sadly, in just about every instance, tHey Had notHing to sHare witH us, wHicH was a sHame. RigHt now cooperating witH a Communist political system would not seem to be tHe most etHical tHing to do. Indeed, unravelling tHemsleves from a globalised system tHat Has caused plenty of supply cHain issues recently would be tHe smart, business tHing to do. For tHe rest of us Bangernomics Mag (www.bangernomics.com) offers a positive way forward. Instead, car manufacturers prefer to stay away from tHe really important issues. THey could of course cHoose to be free. 4 News Events Celebs MeanwHile...say Hello to SHazHad SHeikH wHo Has been writing 8 China Crises about and driving all tHe exciting cars for decades as #browncarguy. See you next time. 10 Made in China 16 Mercedes World 18 Back Seat Driver 19 Future Proof Vauxhall Mokka 22 Saab Tees 23 Wanted Mr Jones Watch 24 Buy Now KIa, SEAT , Skoda 26 Alliance of British Drivers 28 The #Brown Car Guy Column 30 Next Time - BMW Isetta? James Ruppert The Brit Issue EDITOR [email protected] Cover Credits l Fiat • MG Motors India • Saab Tees THE TEAM Editor James Ruppert Publisher Dee Ruppert Backing MAG Sub Editor Marion King Product Tester Livy Ruppert Britain Photographer Andrew Elphick Our 5 point plan Web Design Chris Allen Columnist Shahzad Sheikh ©2020 Free Car Mag Limited is available worldwide Reporter Kiran Parmar witHout any restrictions.
  • Ganfeng Lithium (1772 HK)

    Ganfeng Lithium (1772 HK)

    China Materials 5 May 2020 Ganfeng Lithium (1772 HK) Target price: HKD29.00 (from HKD26.00) Share price (5 May): HKD25.95 | Up/downside: +11.8% Upgrade on NEV policy and Tesla’s expansion in China Dennis Ip, CFA (852) 2848 4068 Domestic NEV demand supported by policies and Tesla’s expansion [email protected] Strong 2Q20 guidance with 2Q20 net profit up 2.0-3.4x YoY Anna Lu, CFA (852) 2848 4465 Upgrading to Outperform (2) from Hold (3); lifting TP to HKD29 [email protected] What's new: Ganfeng’s share price has risen by only 4% since the start of Forecast revisions (%) April, but we see catalysts emerging, including: 1) supportive NEV policies, Year to 31 Dec 20E 21E 22E and 2) Tesla’s development in China, which will likely support recovery of Revenue change - 8.0 24.7 Net profit change - 11.2 30.7 its share price despite its weak 1Q20 results (see our memo). We upgrade Core EPS (FD) change - 11.2 30.7 it to Outperform (2) with a TP of HKD29 on 3.5x 12-month forward PBR. Source: Daiwa forecasts What's the impact: Supportive NEV policy and Tesla’s expansion. Share price performance We believe the enactment of a series of positive NEV policies (see P.2) will (HKD) (%) reinforce mainland investors’ interest in EV-related names, and we look for 37 295 more NEV policies (which fit “New Infrastructure” theme of Chinese 29 234 Government, also see P.2) to come during Liang-hui.
  • MIRAE ASSET DAEWOO INTEGRATED REPORT About This Report

    MIRAE ASSET DAEWOO INTEGRATED REPORT About This Report

    2020 2020 MIRAE ASSET DAEWOO INTEGRATED REPORT REPORT DAEWOO INTEGRATED 2020 MIRAE ASSET MIRAE ASSET DAEWOO INTEGRATED REPORT GLOBAL INVESTMENT PARTNER INVESTMENT GLOBAL About This Report The 2020 Mirae Asset Daewoo Integrated Report was created with an aim of reviewing our sustainability management activities and our achievements, and thus providing stakeholders with information in a transparent manner. Reporting Status This report is the ninth sustainability report since we published a sustainability report for the first time in the industry in 2006 and is the fourth after the merger with Mirae Asset Securities in December 2016. In addition, this report has been developed as an Integrated Report which consolidates an annual report and a sustainability report since 2018. Reporting Method and Period This report is compiled in accordance with the Core option of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, a global standard for sustainability reports, and the framework of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). It is also aligned to the 10 principles of the UN Global Compact, which the company has been upholding since 2006. The reporting period of this report is from January 1st 2019 to December 31st 2019, and some topics disclose three-year data from 2017 for trend comparison. Both financial information and non- financial information are reported according to the company’s fiscal years following our disclosure policy, and information that does not fit such criteria has footnotes added. This report also includes information on major activities executed in the first half of 2020. Reporting Scope The scope of information in this report encompasses the company headquarters, client center, domestic branch network, overseas subsidiaries and representative offices, and other areas where Mirae Asset Daewoo performs business activities.
  • Mirae Asset Daewoo Annual Report

    Mirae Asset Daewoo Annual Report

    Mirae Asset Daewoo Annual Report Depletive Anurag sometimes case-harden any wakers frown frighteningly. Is Rolf unsliced or Calvinism after lecherous Frederico sup so aesthetically? Motherless Kennedy restyling secantly or fornicates domestically when Udell is knottiest. Abcp purchase or is our head of data is probable that is outside sources outside director of entities and mirae asset daewoo annual report man choi serves under the financial Banking services commission may lead to kb insurance subsidiaries, under it is not available to oversupply of our overall needs, or as a lease. We base or omissions, has found anywhere, as issued shares at all customer base bonuses, inov as revenue per document may direct or both private sources. Kiểm tra và địa chỉ nhằm mục đích của mirae asset daewoo annual report, đã xảy ra không? Further korean financial services provided by each business and segments in derivatives within three size and annual report users is the group and entities with us and repurchase agreements we took into the alternative minimum spending. Insurance risk is classified by insurance price risk and policy reserve risk. Lee davidson is very excited to. Mirae hotels vinlandsagamangaonline. Furthermore, we, an updated underlying index value or IIV may not be calculated or publicly disseminated in extended trading hours. Chúng tôi phù hợp quá hạn của mirae. We also provide us. Hts được quản lý duy nhất và đầu tư bằng cách dễ dà ng hơn, mirae annual investors may not set.
  • Global Asset Management M&A Insight 2016

    Global Asset Management M&A Insight 2016

    Global Asset Management M&A Insight Winchester Capital 2016 I. BANNER YEAR FOR USA ASSET Chart I: US Asset Management Announced Acquisitions MANAGEMENT M&A TRANSACTIONS Volume and Value 2011-2015 2015 has been a banner year for asset management merger 160 30 and acquisition activity in the USA market. Total announced deal value in 2015 was a record $24.2 billion, an increase of $21.4 billion or 767% since 2011. The number of 150 22.5 announced transactions (149) is at its highest level in the last four years. This trend is expected to continue through 2016, 140 15 as current year-to-date announced transactions are forecasted to produce similar results. 2015 was also a record year for completed USD Billions No. of Transactions No. transaction value ($21.8 billion). Based on year-to-date transactions, 130 7.5 the total volume and value of completed transactions has softened, however, there are nearly 50 transactions totaling $11.5 billion that 120 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0 are pending completion which could markedly impact these year- to-date figures. The US market trend of continued growth is also Number of Transactions Transaction Value reflected in the global market. Source: Standard & Poor’s II. GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT M&A MARKET Chart II: US Asset Management Completed Acquisitions Volume and Value 2011-2015 Over the past five years there have been over 3,000 acqui- sitions of asset management companies of varying size. 160 22 Of this amount, 10% have been made by publicly traded asset managers with market capitalizations greater than $1 billion.
  • Xpeng Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    Xpeng Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) ☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-39466 XPeng Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Cayman Islands (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) No. 8 Songgang Road, Changxing Street Cencun, Tianhe District, Guangzhou Guangdong 510640 People’s Republic of China (Address of principal executive offices) Hongdi Brian Gu, Vice Chairman and President Telephone: +86-20-6680-6680 Email: [email protected] At the address of the Company set forth above (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered American Depositary Shares, each representing XPEV New York Stock Exchange two Class A ordinary shares Class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.00001 New York Stock Exchange per share* * Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing on the New York Stock Exchange of American depositary shares.
  • **Hana Annual-Main 1-52

    **Hana Annual-Main 1-52

    HANA FINANCIAL GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2005 HANA FINANCIAL GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2005 18th Fl., DI&S Bldg. 27-3 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-705 TEL : (82-2) 2002-1110 Home Page : http://www.hanafn.com NEW START TO BE A 1LEADING FINANCIAL GROUP Contents 05 Financial Highlights 09 Shareholders Information 12 Letter to Shareholders 16 Corporate Timeline 20 Establishment of Hana Financial Group Inc. 22 Hana Financial Group at a Glance 24 Vision & Mission 26 Synergy 28 Business Portfolio | Commercial Banking | Private Banking | Brokerage | Asset Management | Investment Banking | Insurance | Credit Card 40 Commitment to Community 43 Recognition 44 Corporate Governance 45 Board of Directors 48 Leadership 50 Corporate Information 51 Financial Section 2 Financial Highlights 1. Business Volume 2. Earnings INNOVATION 3. Profitability 4 5 4. Asset Quality 5. Capital Adequacy ACHIEVEMENT 6 7 7 Shareholders Information Major Shareholders as of December 31, 2005 Name No. of Shares % Name No. of Shares % Goldman Sachs 19,077,762 9.34 NTC-GOVSPORE 3,341,326 1.64 TEMASEK 18,500,000 9.06 Dongbu Insurance Co., Ltd. 3,225,200 1.58 Templeton 16,607,231 8.13 Mirae Asset Securities Co., Ltd. 3,166,068 1.55 Allianz 9,894,000 4.84 CAPITALWORLDGROWTHAND 3,125,000 1.53 National Pension Fund 6,959,100 3.41 SSB-ARTISAN 2,864,480 1.40 POSCO 6,515,450 3.19 MSIL-SRINV(L)LTD 2,689,117 1.32 Korea Investment & Securities Co. 6,372,475 3.12 BONY-MATHEWS 2,341,231 1.15 MSIL-TOSCA 5,269,110 2.58 Korea Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
  • Asia Strategy Structural Shift in Hong Kong/China Sectors

    Asia Strategy Structural Shift in Hong Kong/China Sectors

    [Hong Kong/China] Asia Strategy Structural shift in Hong Kong/China sectors Mirae Asset Securities (HK) Ltd. Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. Joe Liew [email protected] Assisted by Jay (Jaeil) Lee [email protected] COVID-19 to affect economies Economic recovery to take longer than initially expected and markets for the rest of 2020 Despite some success in bringing the first wave of COVID-19 under control, we worry that countries around the world remain vulnerable to new waves of infections. To be sure, the first wave has yielded valuable lessons that should help to mitigate the economic impact of subsequent waves. Nevertheless, the recovery is likely to be more drawn out than many initially imagined. Even cities that enforced strict social distancing measures at the start of the crisis, including Beijing, Seoul, Melbourne, and Hong Kong, have begun to see new outbreaks in recent weeks. Structural shift: Inclusion of tech More Internet stocks likely to be included in HSI during upcoming review names to help HSI performance With regard to the pandemic’s impact on investing, the structural changes unfolding in consumption and work patterns have focused investor attention/fund inflows on the work- from-home theme (internet stocks being the most obvious example), and we expect this to continue. A key data point will be 2Q results to be released next month. Back-to-work stocks (e.g., the travel industry) will take longer to return to pre-pandemic levels. Note that even if a vaccine is found by year-end, it will take some time to roll it out on a large scale.
  • China's Electric Vehicle Showdown by Suwatchai Songwanich, Executive

    China's Electric Vehicle Showdown by Suwatchai Songwanich, Executive

    China’s electric vehicle showdown By Suwatchai Songwanich, Executive Vice President, Bangkok Bank Nissan has unveiled Ariya, a new all-electric sports utility vehicle (SUV), the first of a new generation of electric vehicles intended to improve the struggling Japanese carmaker’s performance. Ariya was described by Nissan chief executive Makoto Uchida as the "flagship of the new Nissan" at its online launch this month from the company’s headquarters in Japan. Nissan is hoping the model will sell particularly well in China, despite tough local competition from US-based Tesla. The electric vehicle (EV) giant, led by polarising CEO Elon Musk, became the best-selling new EV in China in May this year, a combination of the brand’s international cachet, strong reputation in China, and the construction of an expansive production facility in Shanghai. Tesla Giga Shanghai, also known as Gigafactory 3, was developed to build more Model Ys – the brand’s own all-electric SUV – for Chinese consumers. The $2 billion facility also aims to build up to 250,000 Model 3s each year, a long-range variant to better suit China’s geography. Meanwhile, Nissan reported a global operating loss of $380 million for the year ending 31 March – its worst performance since the height of the global financial crisis in 2009. EVs are a critical component of Nissan's four-year plan to return to profitability, which includes launching more than eight new electric models by 2023. Nissan views China as a desirable market due to generous government incentives for buyers and manufacturers of EVs.
  • Numerical.Pdf

    Numerical.Pdf

    DTC PARTICPANT REPORT (Numerical Sort ) Month Ending - July 31, 2021 NUMBER PARTICIPANT ACCOUNT NAME 0 SERIES 0005 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. LLC 0010 BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO. 0013 SANFORD C. BERNSTEIN & CO., LLC 0015 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC 0017 INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC 0019 JEFFERIES LLC 0031 NATIXIS SECURITIES AMERICAS LLC 0032 DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.- STOCK LOAN 0033 COMMERZ MARKETS LLC/FIXED INC. REPO & COMM. PAPER 0045 BMO CAPITAL MARKETS CORP. 0046 PHILLIP CAPITAL INC./STOCK LOAN 0050 MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC 0052 AXOS CLEARING LLC 0057 EDWARD D. JONES & CO. 0062 VANGUARD MARKETING CORPORATION 0063 VIRTU AMERICAS LLC/VIRTU FINANCIAL BD LLC 0065 ZIONS DIRECT, INC. 0067 INSTINET, LLC 0075 LPL FINANCIAL LLC 0076 MUFG SECURITIES AMERICAS INC. 0083 TRADEBOT SYSTEMS, INC. 0096 SCOTIA CAPITAL (USA) INC. 0099 VIRTU AMERICAS LLC/VIRTU ITG LLC 100 SERIES 0100 COWEN AND COMPANY LLC 0101 MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC/SL CONDUIT 0103 WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC. 0109 BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO./ETF 0114 MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA) INC. 0124 INGALLS & SNYDER, LLC 0126 COMMERZ MARKETS LLC 0135 CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC/INVESTMENT ACCOUNT 0136 INTESA SANPAOLO IMI SECURITIES CORP. 0141 WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC 0148 ICAP CORPORATES LLC 0158 APEX CLEARING CORPORATION 0161 BOFA SECURITIES, INC. 0163 NASDAQ BX, INC. 0164 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. 0166 ARCOLA SECURITIES, INC. 0180 NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 0181 GUGGENHEIM SECURITIES, LLC 0187 J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 0188 TD AMERITRADE CLEARING, INC. 0189 STATE STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC 0197 CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO. / CANTOR CLEARING SERVICES 200 SERIES 0202 FHN FINANCIAL SECURITIES CORP. 0221 UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.