Practice-Oriented Paper Conducting and Interpreting T-Test and ANOVA Using JASP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Practice-Oriented Paper Conducting and Interpreting T-Test and ANOVA Using JASP Practice-Oriented Paper Conducting and Interpreting T-test and ANOVA Using JASP Caroline J. Handley Asia University Many foreign language university educators conduct quantitative research; for some analysing and interpreting the data can be the most challenging aspect. A short introduction to data analysis is presented, focusing on why effect sizes and confidence intervals should be reported as well as the probability of a statistical difference between groups p( value). This is followed by an explanation of how to perform two commonly-used analyses in applied linguistics research, t-test and ANOVA, using JASP, an open source software package created at the University of Amsterdam. Finally, further consideration is given to effect size and confidence intervals, as related to statistical power, to highlight the importance of good study design. The overview provided should be useful for novice researchers who need to perform and report basic statistical analyses of quantitative data obtained through classroom research. This paper provides an introduction to basic statistical analysis of quantitative data for novice researchers. Statistical analysis inevitably involves technical language; such terms that are used in this paper are explained and, for ease of reference, described in table format (Appendix A). A brief overview of some theoretical issues in understanding statistics is given first. Then, after a summary of the version of JASP1(JASP Team, 2018; Version 0.9.0.1; downloaded at jasp-stats.org), a fictional data set is used to illustrate how to perform two frequently-used analyses in applied linguistics research using JASP software. First, I explain how to import data into JASP, then how to calculate and visualise the numbers that describe the data (descriptive statistics). Next, an example is given of an independent t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). These tests yield a probability p( ) value which enables researchers to make predictions about the whole population based 143 Handley on the sample used in one’s experiment (inferential statistics). Finally, the data is used to discuss interpreting and supplementing p values and designing reliable experiments. The experimental design described in this paper involves the comparison of students within a control group (i.e., a group which receives no experimental intervention) and one or more experimental groups. The intervention is the independent variable (the factor manipulated) and its effect is measured on the dependent variable (test scores) by means of an independent t-test and ANOVA (explained below). Both test the null hypothesis that any difference between the scores of each group is due to chance variation (random error). The tests give the probability of the results that were obtained if the null hypothesis were true, stated as a p value, which is typically declared statistically significant if it is less than .05 (if the results would be obtained due to chance in less than 5% of studies). This probability is based on the difference between the mean (average test score) of each group and the variance within each group (the difference between each student’s score and their group mean), summarised as the standard deviation of each group. The tests do not test the research hypothesis (the alternative hypothesis) of a systematic effect of the intervention on test scores, therefore a significant p value does not indicate the research hypothesis is true (see Cohen, 1994 for a detailed explanation). Statistical significance testing, although widely used, has long been criticised due to two further limitations (e.g., Carver, 1978). Thep value obtained is largely dependent on the sample size (the number of students in each group) and does not provide any information about the magnitude of any difference between groups. Since 1994, APA guidelines have stated that effect sizes should always be reported alongside p values (American Psychological Association, 2009), although this is rare in applied linguistics research (Norris & Ortega, 2000; Plonsky, 2011). Effect size is a measure of the magnitude of the effect or difference between groups (or interventions), so it more directly diagnoses the importance of the factor(s) or variables being investigated (Plonsky, 2015). Benchmarks proposed by Cohen (1992) for the behavioural sciences are often used. For differences between the means of two groups (such ast -test), 144 Conducting and Interpreting T-test and ANOVA Using JASP, OCJSI 1, pages 143-162 he suggested that Cohen’s d = 0.2 should be considered a small effect, 0.5 is a medium effect, and any value over 0.8 indicates a large effect. Unlike when reporting p values, the zero before the decimal point is needed as effect sizes larger than one are possible. However, Oswald and Plonsky (2010) tentatively proposed that in L2 research, Cohen’s d values of 0.4, 0.7, and 1.0 should be considered the benchmarks for small, medium, and large effects. For differences between the means of more than two groups (such as ANOVA), the standards for eta squared (ƞ2) or omega squared (ω2) are 0.01 for small, 0.06 for medium, and 0.14 for large effects (Field, 2017). Confidence intervals (CIs) are another measure that should be reported (Cumming, 2012), as they show the uncertainty around the mean values obtained. They are based on the standard error, which is calculated from the standard deviation and sample size, meaning that confidence intervals decrease as sample or group size increases. The 95% confidence interval covers a range of values above and below the mean of each group, indicating 95% confidence that the true mean lies somewhere within this range. Small groups are more vulnerable to chance variation, so 95% CIs are likely to be long, reflecting low confidence in the accuracy of one’s results. Effect sizes and CIs are explained not only to encourage better reporting of results, but also to highlight the importance of sample size in quantitative research. In the fictional experiment created to model data analysis, I used the average group size in second language research of 20 participants (Plonsky, 2013; Plonsky & Gass, 2011). This was deliberate to illustrate why this sample size is often too small to reliably detect a significant difference even when the research hypothesis is true. If the group size is too small, an experiment is underpowered, and chance largely determines whether the result will be statistically significant (Ioannidis, 2005). This issue in the analyses conducted is revisited at the end of this paper, and some further resources for understanding and conducting quantitative data analysis are provided in Appendix B. 145 Handley Data Analysis in JASP JASP is used in this paper as it is free software, available for Windows, Mac, and LINUX. It is user-friendly for novices and includes guided analyses of various data sets, many taken from Field (2017). Results of statistical tests performed in JASP are displayed in tables and graphs that can be exported into documents in APA format. In addition, JASP is regularly being updated to expand its functionality. JASP also offers advanced statistical analyses, such as structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian versions of most inferential tests. Bayesian analysis is an alternative approach to probability testing which is being adopted in many scientific disciplines (e.g., Van de Schoot, Winter, Ryan, Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, & Depaoli, 2017). It is not discussed in this paper, but a short introduction by the developers can be downloaded from the website (Wagenmakers, Gronau, Etz, & Matzke, 2017). The analyses described below were performed using a deliberately simple fictional data set, simulating the scores of 20 participants per group on a vocabulary test with a maximum score of 20. The imaginary scenario was that students read texts containing a total of 20 unknown words, then were tested on their knowledge of those target words under one of two to three conditions: no explicit vocabulary instruction (control group), Intervention A, and, to describe ANOVA, an alternative Intervention B. The research hypothesis for both analyses was that the students who received the teaching intervention(s) would perform significantly better on the vocabulary test than the control group. Therefore, the null hypothesis being tested was that there would be no statistically significant difference in test scores between groups. Importing and Manipulating Data in JASP JASP can open data files that are saved as .csv, .sav, or .ods files. Excel spreadsheets can be saved as .csv files by selecting that option from the dropdown menu on saving. When the file is open in JASP, any subsequent changes saved in the original spreadsheet are automatically updated. The data for each participant should be entered in separate rows, with appropriate column headings. In the example data sets used here, there are a control and one or two intervention groups. This 146 Conducting and Interpreting T-test and ANOVA Using JASP, OCJSI 1, pages 143-162 means that for both the t-test and ANOVA there are just three columns of data: participant ID, group type, and vocabulary test score. As Figure 1 shows, JASP displays information in three panels. The data are on the left, the instructions options for the analyses are in the centre, and the results of the analyses performed are on the right. On loading the spreadsheet, JASP guesses the type of data in each column: nominal (non-numerical data, such as gender), ordinal (ranked numbers, such as the responses on a Likert scale), and scale (numbers that are separated by equal distances, such as test scores2). If JASP guesses incorrectly, click on the symbol next to the heading to change it before proceeding. The available statistical tests are spread across the top bar, from which a sub-type is selected. Then the middle panel will appear with boxes for entering data into the analysis.
Recommended publications
  • Anomalous Perception in a Ganzfeld Condition - a Meta-Analysis of More Than 40 Years Investigation [Version 1; Peer Review: Awaiting Peer Review]
    F1000Research 2021, 10:234 Last updated: 08 SEP 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Stage 2 Registered Report: Anomalous perception in a Ganzfeld condition - A meta-analysis of more than 40 years investigation [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] Patrizio E. Tressoldi 1, Lance Storm2 1Studium Patavinum, University of Padua, Padova, Italy 2School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia v1 First published: 24 Mar 2021, 10:234 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51746.1 Latest published: 24 Mar 2021, 10:234 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51746.1 Reviewer Status AWAITING PEER REVIEW Any reports and responses or comments on the Abstract article can be found at the end of the article. This meta-analysis is an investigation into anomalous perception (i.e., conscious identification of information without any conventional sensorial means). The technique used for eliciting an effect is the ganzfeld condition (a form of sensory homogenization that eliminates distracting peripheral noise). The database consists of studies published between January 1974 and December 2020 inclusive. The overall effect size estimated both with a frequentist and a Bayesian random-effect model, were in close agreement yielding an effect size of .088 (.04-.13). This result passed four publication bias tests and seems not contaminated by questionable research practices. Trend analysis carried out with a cumulative meta-analysis and a meta-regression model with Year of publication as covariate, did not indicate sign of decline of this effect size. The moderators analyses show that selected participants outcomes were almost three-times those obtained by non-selected participants and that tasks that simulate telepathic communication show a two- fold effect size with respect to tasks requiring the participants to guess a target.
    [Show full text]
  • Dentist's Knowledge of Evidence-Based Dentistry and Digital Applications Resources in Saudi Arabia
    PTB Reports Research Article Dentist’s Knowledge of Evidence-based Dentistry and Digital Applications Resources in Saudi Arabia Yousef Ahmed Alomi*, BSc. Pharm, MSc. Clin Pharm, BCPS, BCNSP, DiBA, CDE ABSTRACT Critical Care Clinical Pharmacists, TPN Objectives: Drug information resources provide clinicians with safer use of medications and play a Clinical Pharmacist, Freelancer Business vital role in improving drug safety. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become essential to medical Planner, Content Editor, and Data Analyst, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA. practice; however, EBM is still an emerging dentistry concept. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to Anwar Mouslim Alshammari, B.D.S explore dentists’ knowledge about evidence-based dentistry resources in Saudi Arabia. Methods: College of Destiney, Hail University, SAUDI This is a 4-month cross-sectional study conducted to analyze dentists’ knowledge about evidence- ARABIA. based dentistry resources in Saudi Arabia. We included dentists from interns to consultants and Hanin Sumaydan Saleam Aljohani, those across all dentistry specialties and located in Saudi Arabia. The survey collected demographic Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA. information and knowledge of resources on dental drugs. The knowledge of evidence-based dental care and knowledge of dental drug information applications. The survey was validated through the Correspondence: revision of expert reviewers and pilot testing. Moreover, various reliability tests had been done with Dr. Yousef Ahmed Alomi, BSc. Pharm, the study. The data were collected through the Survey Monkey system and analyzed using Statistical MSc. Clin Pharm, BCPS, BCNSP, DiBA, CDE Critical Care Clinical Pharmacists, TPN Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) and Jeffery’s Amazing Statistics Program (JASP).
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Correlation and Linear Regression
    11. Correlation and linear regression The goal in this chapter is to introduce correlation and linear regression. These are the standard tools that statisticians rely on when analysing the relationship between continuous predictors and continuous outcomes. 11.1 Correlations In this section we’ll talk about how to describe the relationships between variables in the data. To do that, we want to talk mostly about the correlation between variables. But first, we need some data. 11.1.1 The data Table 11.1: Descriptive statistics for the parenthood data. variable min max mean median std. dev IQR Dan’s grumpiness 41 91 63.71 62 10.05 14 Dan’s hours slept 4.84 9.00 6.97 7.03 1.02 1.45 Dan’s son’s hours slept 3.25 12.07 8.05 7.95 2.07 3.21 ............................................................................................ Let’s turn to a topic close to every parent’s heart: sleep. The data set we’ll use is fictitious, but based on real events. Suppose I’m curious to find out how much my infant son’s sleeping habits affect my mood. Let’s say that I can rate my grumpiness very precisely, on a scale from 0 (not at all grumpy) to 100 (grumpy as a very, very grumpy old man or woman). And lets also assume that I’ve been measuring my grumpiness, my sleeping patterns and my son’s sleeping patterns for - 251 - quite some time now. Let’s say, for 100 days. And, being a nerd, I’ve saved the data as a file called parenthood.csv.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis in JASP
    Copyright © 2018 by Mark A Goss-Sampson. All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the purposes of research, education or private study. CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. 1 USING THE JASP INTERFACE .................................................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ......................................................................................................................... 8 EXPLORING DATA INTEGRITY ................................................................................................................ 15 ONE SAMPLE T-TEST ............................................................................................................................. 22 BINOMIAL TEST ..................................................................................................................................... 25 MULTINOMIAL TEST .............................................................................................................................. 28 CHI-SQUARE ‘GOODNESS-OF-FIT’ TEST............................................................................................. 30 MULTINOMIAL AND Χ2 ‘GOODNESS-OF-FIT’ TEST. ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Mini Meta-Analysis and Related Things Updated on June 25, 2018 Here Are Some Resources That I and Others Find
    Resources for Mini Meta-Analysis and Related Things Updated on June 25, 2018 Here are some resources that I and others find useful. I know my mini meta SPPC article and Excel were not exhaustive and I didn’t cover many things, so I hope this resource page will give you some answers. I’ll update this page whenever I find something new or receive suggestions. Meta-Analysis Guides & Workshops • David Wilson, who wrote Practical Meta-Analysis, has a website containing PowerPoints and macros (for SPSS, Stata, and SAS) as well as some useful links on meta-analysis o I created an Excel template based on his slides (read the Excel page to see how this template differs from my previous SPPC template) • McShane and Böckenholt (2017) wrote an article in the Journal of Consumer Research similar to my mini meta paper. It comes with a very cool website that calculates meta- analysis for you: https://blakemcshane.shinyapps.io/spmetacase1/ • Courtney Soderberg from the Center for Open Science gave a mini meta-analysis workshop at SIPS 2017. All materials are publicly available: https://osf.io/nmdtq/ • Adam Pegler wrote a tutorial blog on using R to calculate mini meta based on my article • The founders of MetaLab at Stanford made video tutorials on meta-analysis in general • Geoff Cumming has a video tutorial on meta-analysis and other “new statistics” or read his Psychological Science article on the “new statistics” • Patrick Forscher’s meta-analysis syllabus and class materials are available online • A blog post containing 5 tips to understand and carefully
    [Show full text]
  • Sequence Ambiguity Determined from Routine Pol Sequencing Is a Reliable Tool for Real-Time Surveillance of HIV Incidence Trends
    Infection, Genetics and Evolution 69 (2019) 146–152 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Infection, Genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/meegid Research paper Sequence ambiguity determined from routine pol sequencing is a reliable T tool for real-time surveillance of HIV incidence trends ⁎ Maja M. Lunara, Snježana Židovec Lepejb, Mario Poljaka, a Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana 1105, Slovenia b Dr. Fran Mihaljevič University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Mirogojska 8, Zagreb 10000, Croatia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Identifying individuals recently infected with HIV has been of great significance for close monitoring of HIV HIV-1 epidemic dynamics. Low HIV sequence ambiguity (SA) has been described as a promising marker of recent Incidence infection in previous studies. This study explores the utility of SA defined as a proportion of ambiguous nu- Sequence ambiguity cleotides detected in baseline pol sequences as a tool for routine real-time surveillance of HIV incidence trends at Mixed base calls a national level. Surveillance A total of 353 partial HIV-1 pol sequences obtained from persons diagnosed with HIV infection in Slovenia from 2000 to 2012 were studied, and SA was reported as a percentage of ambiguous base calls. Patients were characterized as recently infected by examining anti-HIV serological patterns and/or using commercial HIV-1 incidence assays (BED and/or LAg-Avidity assay). A mean SA of 0.29%, 0.14%, and 0.19% was observed for infections classified as recent by BED, LAg, or anti-HIV serological results, respectively. Welch's t-test showed a significant difference in the SA of recent versus long-standing infections (p < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Categorical Data Analysis
    9. Categorical data analysis Now that we’ve covered the basic theory behind hypothesis testing it’s time to start looking at specific tests that are commonly used in psychology. So where should we start? Not every textbook agrees on where to start, but I’m going to start with “χ2 tests” (this chapter, pronounced “chi-square”1)and “t-tests” (Chapter 10). Both of these tools are very frequently used in scientific practice, and whilst they’re not as powerful as “regression” (Chapter 11) and “analysis of variance” (Chapter 12)they’re much easier to understand. The term “categorical data” is just another name for “nominal scale data”. It’s nothing that we haven’t already discussed, it’s just that in the context of data analysis people tend to use the term “categorical data” rather than “nominal scale data”. I don’t know why. In any case, categorical data analysis refers to a collection of tools that you can use when your data are nominal scale. However, there are a lot of different tools that can be used for categorical data analysis, and this chapter covers only a few of the more common ones. 9.1 The χ2 (chi-square) goodness-of-fit test The χ2 goodness-of-fit test is one of the oldest hypothesis tests around. It was invented by Karl Pearson around the turn of the century (Pearson 1900), with some corrections made later by Sir Ronald Fisher (Fisher 1922a). It tests whether an observed frequency distribution of a nominal variable matches an expected frequency distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs
    JSS Journal of Statistical Software January 2019, Volume 88, Issue 2. doi: 10.18637/jss.v088.i02 JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs Jonathon Love Ravi Selker Maarten Marsman University of Newcastle University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Tahira Jamil Damian Dropmann Josine Verhagen University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Alexander Ly Quentin F. Gronau Martin Šmíra University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Masaryk University Sacha Epskamp Dora Matzke Anneliese Wild University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Patrick Knight Jeffrey N. Rouder Richard D. Morey University of Amsterdam University of California, Irvine Cardiff University University of Missouri Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam Abstract This paper introduces JASP, a free graphical software package for basic statistical pro- cedures such as t tests, ANOVAs, linear regression models, and analyses of contingency tables. JASP is open-source and differentiates itself from existing open-source solutions in two ways. First, JASP provides several innovations in user interface design; specifically, results are provided immediately as the user makes changes to options, output is attrac- tive, minimalist, and designed around the principle of progressive disclosure, and analyses can be peer reviewed without requiring a “syntax”. Second, JASP provides some of the recent developments in Bayesian hypothesis testing and Bayesian parameter estimation. The ease with which these relatively complex Bayesian techniques are available in JASP encourages their broader adoption and furthers a more inclusive statistical reporting prac- tice. The JASP analyses are implemented in R and a series of R packages. Keywords: JASP, statistical software, Bayesian inference, graphical user interface, basic statis- tics.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis in JASP V0.10.0- a Students Guide .Pdf
    2nd Edition JASP v0.10.0 June 2019 Copyright © 2019 by Mark A Goss-Sampson. All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the purposes of research, education or private study. CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. 1 USING THE JASP ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................ 2 DATA HANDLING IN JASP ........................................................................................................................ 7 JASP ANALYSIS MENU ........................................................................................................................... 10 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 12 EXPLORING DATA INTEGRITY ................................................................................................................ 21 DATA TRANSFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 29 ONE SAMPLE T-TEST ............................................................................................................................. 33 BINOMIAL TEST ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Comparing Several Means (One-Way ANOVA)
    12. Comparing several means (one-way ANOVA) This chapter introduces one of the most widely used tools in psychological statistics, known as “the analysis of variance”, but usually referred to as ANOVA. The basic technique was developed by Sir Ronald Fisher in the early 20th century and it is to him that we owe the rather unfortunate terminology. The term ANOVA is a little misleading, in two respects. Firstly, although the name of the technique refers to variances, ANOVA is concerned with investigating differences in means. Secondly, there are several different things out there that are all referred to as ANOVAs, some of which have only a very tenuous connection to one another. Later on in the book we’ll encounter a range of different ANOVA methods that apply in quite different situations, but for the purposes of this chapter we’ll only consider the simplest form of ANOVA, in which we have several different groups of observations, and we’re interested in finding out whether those groups differ in terms of some outcome variable of interest. This is the question that is addressed by a one-way ANOVA. The structure of this chapter is as follows: in Section 12.1 I’ll introduce a fictitious data set that we’ll use as a running example throughout the chapter. After introducing the data, I’ll describe the mechanics of how a one-way ANOVA actually works (Section 12.2) and then focus on how you can run one in JASP (Section 12.3). These two sections are the core of the chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tutorial on Bayesian Multi-Model Linear Regression with BAS and JASP
    Behavior Research Methods https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01552-2 A tutorial on Bayesian multi-model linear regression with BAS and JASP Don van den Bergh1 · Merlise A. Clyde2 · Akash R. Komarlu Narendra Gupta1 · Tim de Jong1 · Quentin F. Gronau1 · Maarten Marsman1 · Alexander Ly1,3 · Eric-Jan Wagenmakers1 Accepted: 21 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Linear regression analyses commonly involve two consecutive stages of statistical inquiry. In the first stage, a single ‘best’ model is defined by a specific selection of relevant predictors; in the second stage, the regression coefficients of the winning model are used for prediction and for inference concerning the importance of the predictors. However, such second-stage inference ignores the model uncertainty from the first stage, resulting in overconfident parameter estimates that generalize poorly. These drawbacks can be overcome by model averaging, a technique that retains all models for inference, weighting each model’s contribution by its posterior probability. Although conceptually straightforward, model averaging is rarely used in applied research, possibly due to the lack of easily accessible software. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we provide a tutorial on linear regression using Bayesian model averaging in JASP, based on the BAS package in R. Firstly, we provide theoretical background on linear regression, Bayesian inference, and Bayesian model averaging. Secondly, we demonstrate the method on an example data set from the World Happiness Report. Lastly,
    [Show full text]
  • A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP
    A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP Don van den Bergh∗1, Johnny van Doorn1, Maarten Marsman1, Tim Draws1, Erik-Jan van Kesteren4, Koen Derks1,2, Fabian Dablander1, Quentin F. Gronau1, Simonˇ Kucharsk´y1, Akash R. Komarlu Narendra Gupta1, Alexandra Sarafoglou1, Jan G. Voelkel5, Angelika Stefan1, Alexander Ly1,3, Max Hinne1, Dora Matzke1, and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers1 1University of Amsterdam 2Nyenrode Business University 3Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica 4Utrecht University 5Stanford University Abstract Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is the standard procedure for statistical inference in factorial designs. Typically, ANOVAs are executed using fre- quentist statistics, where p-values determine statistical significance in an all-or-none fashion. In recent years, the Bayesian approach to statistics is increasingly viewed as a legitimate alternative to the p-value. How- ever, the broad adoption of Bayesian statistics {and Bayesian ANOVA in particular{ is frustrated by the fact that Bayesian concepts are rarely taught in applied statistics courses. Consequently, practitioners may be unsure how to conduct a Bayesian ANOVA and interpret the results. Here we provide a guide for executing and interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA with JASP, an open-source statistical software program with a graphical user interface. We explain the key concepts of the Bayesian ANOVA using two empirical examples. ∗Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Don van den Bergh University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychological Methods Postbus 15906, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-Mail should be sent to: [email protected]. 1 Ubiquitous across the empirical sciences, analysis of variance (ANOVA) al- lows researchers to assess the effects of categorical predictors on a continuous outcome variable.
    [Show full text]