OUR STORIES in STONE PART 1 in Ottawa, We're So

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OUR STORIES in STONE PART 1 in Ottawa, We're So OUR STORIES IN STONE PART 1 In Ottawa, we’re so accustomed to statues and memorials that we no longer see them. They are … Sites unseen CHRIS MIKULA, THE OTTAWA CITIZEN But Citizen writer ROBERT SIBLEY and photographer CHRIS MIKULA, left, stopped to take a closer look. Here are their impressions of our memorials — and what they tell us about ourselves and the soul of the city. Stopping among statues Monuments are stories in stone and bronze that reflect who we are and where we came from. Here in Ottawa, we’re so used to these memorials that we no longer see them. But say you made time to stop? Where would you go? And where would it take you? ROBERT SIBLEY finds out on a hunt for the soul of the city CHRIS MIKULA , THE OTTAWA CITIZEN Simply walking by Sir Galahad will be harder to do once you know the story of the brave and selfless Henry Albert Harper. verybody ignores Sir Galahad. For one, to stop at Sir Galahad, a statue flip-flops take pictures of each other be- an hour I’ve been parked on a dedicated a century ago to the memory neath the famous cross-country runner’s Ebench at the corner of Metcalfe of Henry Albert Harper that occupies bronze legs, natural and artificial. A mid- and Wellington streets, watching early prime real estate on Wellington in front dle-aged couple in shorts and sun hats morning strollers, office workers and of a Parliament Hill gate. follow suit. Another young couple reads tourists. The tourists are easy to spot in Nobody does. Instead, they seem to the plaque about the young man’s at- their gaudy clothing and thick-soled prefer the Terry Fox statue in the plaza. tempt in 1980 to run across Canada to shoes. I keep waiting for someone, any- A couple of Chinese girls in shorts and raise awareness about cancer. 2 As I walked the length of the granite I had a similar experience at the wall,touching the inscribed names, Vimy Memorial in France,where catching my reflection in the the names of thousands of polished stone,I couldn’t help Canadian soldiers are carved. but feel loss and sorrow even though Imagining those young men I lost no relatives or friends clawing their way up a muddy slope to the Vietnam war. under the hail of enemy fire,well, I don’t know how anyone wouldn’t feel a lump in their throat. VIETNAM MEMORIAL CHIP SOMODEVILLA, GETTY IMAGES VIMY MEMORIAL WAYNE CUDDINGTON, THE OTTAWA CITIZEN Obscurely, I’m disappointed. In the em about King Arthur and his knights, particular events, ideas, individuals or spring of 1976, during my first visit to Ot- carved into the granite pedestal: “If I lose groups of persons,” as geographer tawa, a friend took me on the obligatory myself I save myself.” Wilbur Zelinsky put it — are built to im- tour of Parliament Hill. We strolled along Of course, I would learn more about pinge on our consciousness, to make us Wellington Street to Bank Street and the Harper Memorial years later after I remember and, presumably, think about then on to Parliament Hill, following the moved to Ottawa — how, for instance, a particular historical event or person or curve of the driveway in front of the the statue of Sir Galahad, the chivalrous situation. House of Commons and past the Senate, knight of Arthurian legend, was chosen But as the novelist Robert Musil once emerging on Wellington with the Na- by his close friend, William Lyon observed, “There is nothing in the world tional War Memorial on our left at the Mackenzie King, the future prime min- as invisible as monuments.” We erect top of Elgin Street. We were heading that ister, and was modelled on George Fred- them to be seen, to attract attention; yet, way when I spotted the statue of Sir erick Watts’s famous painting, Sir Gala- at the same time, “something has im- Galahad farther up the sidewalk on my had. But it was the image of Sir Galahad pregnated them against attention. Like a right. — not the statues of prime ministers or drop of water on an oilskin, attention I’ve always been an inveterate reader the Parliament Buildings — that lingered runs down them without stopping for a of plaques, a compulsive inspector of in my memory long after my first visit to moment.” monuments. Sir Galahad struck me as the capital. Does familiarity breed complacency? oddly out of place — the bronze figure Do we lose sight of what is before our of a young man wrapped in a wind- THE PAST IS PRESENT eyes? Geographers argue that the prob- whipped cloak, sword in one hand, So now, on another day 33 years later, lem with monuments is that we tend to standing on a granite block, looking up it seems appropriate to begin a “pilgrim- ignore statues and other commemorative into the sky, dreamily unaware he’s about age” of Ottawa’s monuments with the artifacts because they become part of the to fall into traffic if he takes a step for- statue that first captured my imagination. unconscious background to our lives. We ward. I had to investigate. Living in Ottawa, you become so used see them but we are no longer con- And so I had my introduction to Henry to the presence of monuments — the sciously aware of their presence, and, Albert Harper, a young civil servant who, Peacekeeping Monument on Sussex Dri- hence, we become detached from the as the plaque relates, drowned in his 28th ve or the Human Rights monument in purpose they are intended to serve. year trying to save Miss Bessie Blair front of City Hall on Elgin Street, for ex- This series is a response to complacen- when the young woman fell through the ample — that you no longer really see cy, a field guide for the recovery of a ice on the Ottawa River on Dec. 6, 1901. them. It’s a paradoxical situation. Monu- communal spirit. I am out to discover, or, I read the line from Idylls of the King: ments — objects whose function “is to more precisely, reclaim, the soul of the The Holy Grail, Lord Tennyson’s epic po- celebrate or perpetuate the memory of city. 3 The spirit of a community, its self-un- in France, where the names of thousands derstanding, is revealed, in part at least, There is no grand Mall of Canadian soldiers posted missing and in its artifacts. Museums and galleries, in the national capital, presumed dead are carved into its mas- memorials and monuments, statues and sive ramparts. Looking across the Douai plaques; they all reflect the ideas that no Trafalgar Square, Plain, imagining those young men claw- give meaning and purpose to a place. no Arc de Triomphe. ing their way up a muddy slope under Hence, my walking tour of Ottawa’s the hail of enemy fire, well, I don’t know monuments and statues constitutes an What does this say how anyone wouldn’t feel a lump in their attempt to tap the animating idea, the throat. psyche, of the nation’s capital. about Ottawa? Not all monuments produce an emo- tional response, of course, but, some- WHERE DID WE COME FROM? times, with a bit of imagination and a I don’t think anybody would regard sense of historical empathy, a monument Ottawa as a monumental city, at least in can provide a sense of connection with the same way as, say, London, Washing- what’s gone before you. In Paris, for ex- ton or Paris. London probably has more ample, I long ago adopted — I adopt statues than any city in the world. Kings monuments in most cities I visit — the and queens, soldiers and politicians, po- statue of Marshal Ney, the general who ets and artists, explorers and educators, defended Napoleon’s army during the re- villains and heroes; you’ll find them en- treat from Moscow in 1812. He stands sconced on a pedestal somewhere in the waving a sword beneath the chestnut maze of London’s streets and parks. trees at the corner of boulevards St- Washington, too, displays a monumen- Michel and Montparnasse. I like to ad- tal mindset in that grand view down the mire him from the nearby terrace of Mall from the dome of Capital Hill to the Closerie des Lilas, imagining, as I sip my shining pillars of the Lincoln Memorial. café au lait, the ebb and flow of ignorant What about Ottawa? Few would dis- armies across Europe and how all that pute that Canada’s national capital is clashing produced the modern world, for more modest in its monumental display. good and ill. There is no grand Mall, no Trafalgar The point is this: To be consciously Square, and no Arc de Triomphe. What aware of a monument, to attend to its does this say about the city in both its lo- “space,” is to realize the past can be re- cal identity and its place as a national ternal physical world in which we act. claimed in the present, at least imagina- capital? Do our monuments demonstrate We might ignore them as we pursue our tively, and that it is possible to connect an imaginative response to history or an everyday lives, but that does not mean to the spirit of the past through the pres- inchoate confusion regarding our collec- they have no hold on us. Their presence ence of a physical object. Thus, monu- tive past? Do they reflect an expansive — and their poignant power — remains ments can be a means by which we tie national vision or the poverty of in our consciousness whether or not together the threads of our worldly ex- parochialism? Such questions form the we pay attention.
Recommended publications
  • Urban and Historic Context
    Architectural Rejuvenation Project URBAN AND HISTORIC CONTEXT Barry Padolsky Associates Inc., Architects, Urban Design and Heritage Consultants February 13, 2015 Aerial view of National Arts Centre (2010) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................................2 Urban and Historic Context........................................................................................................2 . The Holt/Bennett Plan ................................................................................................................4 The Gréber Plan .........................................................................................................................6 The Parkin Plan ...........................................................................................................................8 Architecture and National Identity: the Centennial Projects .......................................................9 NAC: The Architectural Challenge ............................................................................................10 The Architectural Response .....................................................................................................13 Architectural Style: Polite “Brutalism” ......................................................................................16 Re-inventing “Brutalism”..........................................................................................................17 NCC Canada’s
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Edwin Lutyens Primary Helpsheet
    Sir Edwin Lutyens Sir Edwin Lutyens (29th March 1869 -1st January 1944) was one of the leading British architects of the 20th century. He was known for adapting traditional architectural styles to the needs of the time. His works include houses, bridges and public gardens. He was one of the three principal architects appointed to the Imperial (now Commonwealth) War Graves Commission (IWGC) when the Commission was formed in 1917 designing many memorials and cemeteries in France and Belgium in the years following the end of World War I. He also designed a number of war memorials in the UK, including The Cenotaph in Whitehall. This helpsheet is designed to be used by primary teachers as background information on Sir Edwin Lutyens. There is also a set of Sir Edwin Lutyens fact cards which can be shared with pupils. Both this helpsheet and the fact cards can be used as part of WMT’s Art unit of work: Great artists and war memorials. Early life Lutyens was born in London, the ninth son and tenth child of Charles and Mary Lutyens who went on to have a total of thirteen children. As a child he suffered from rheumatic fever and as such was the only one of the boys in the family not to go to public school or university. He shared his sisters’ governess and received extra schooling from a much older brother in the holidays. While growing up in Thursley, Surrey Lutyens was able to follow his passion of looking at houses and watched all stages of the buildings in the local area going up.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Commissions: Threads of an Ottawa Planning History
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 11:42 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine A History of Commissions Threads of An Ottawa Planning History Ken Hillis Volume 21, Number 1, October 1992 Article abstract Early planning in Ottawa takes the form of a piece-meal architectural URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019246ar admixture. On paper there remains a series of largely unrealized proposals DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar designed to promote an image symbolic of national identity. Successive federal and municipal agencies worked to various degrees of success to augment See table of contents Ottawa's appearance and amenity. British planner Thomas Adams' departure from, and the subsequent demise of the Federal Commission of Conservation in the early 1920's marked a low point in efforts to evolve comprehensive Publisher(s) planning strategies. The career of Noulan Cauchon, first head of the Ottawa Town Planning Commission, aimed to keep the notion of planning alive in the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine city. Certain of his little-acknowledged proposals bear remarkable similarity to the pre-W.W. II planning efforts of MacKenzie King and Jacques Greber. ISSN Cauchon's legacy endures in proposals which appear to have been incorporated into federal planning activities during the post-war era. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hillis, K. (1992). A History of Commissions: Threads of An Ottawa Planning History. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1992 This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Torch 05 25 15Web
    JUNE 2015 for Kids! 2015 Camp EDVentures (ages 5–12) SS01 Week 1—July 6–10 $149 Cruise Around the World! Get your “passports” ready as you leave on an imaginative “cruise” around the world, using games, crafts and creativity. The Kildonan-East and Miles Macdonell group at Juno Beach, Normandy; one of five beaches of the Allied invasion of SS02 Week 2—July 13–17 $149 German-occupied France during the Second World War. Super Cartoon Movie Chaos Week! and Normandy regions of France and STUDENTS HONOUR VE DAY 70TH IN EUROPE It’s Superheroes meets Frozen meets The made some unscheduled detours to Incredibles week with crafts, games, real-life In early March, 40 students from They spent hours listening to the Omaha Beach and Juno Beach, as well heroes, your favourite animated characters and Miles Macdonell Collegiate and stories of veterans in Groesbeek, as cemeteries that held significance for original creations. Kildonan-East Collegiate experienced Netherlands. Later, they met up with them. SS03 Week 3—July 20–24 $149 MasterBuilders Week! an extraordinary memorial celebration over 800 other Canadian students and “A lot of the students had family firsthand, as they visited Europe to took part in a commemorative silent This week, creative games, building, exploring members who were part of the fascinating structures (think bugs, birds, exotic participate in the 70th anniversary of walk to the nearby Canadian cemetery. various campaigns overseas. One architecture and “LegoLand”) will be included. VE Day—May 8, 1945. student’s great-grandfather and “It was surreal. It was silent for at SS04 Week 4—July 27–31 $149 great-great-grandfather were both Ultimate Sports & Games Mashup! VE Day, or Victory in Europe Day, least three kilometres and there were killed in the First World War,” Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Peackeeping, Peace, Memory: Reflections on the Peacekeeping Monument in Ottawa
    Canadian Military History Volume 11 Issue 3 Article 6 2002 Peackeeping, Peace, Memory: Reflections on the eacekP eeping Monument in Ottawa Paul Gough University of the West of England, Bristol, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Gough, Paul "Peackeeping, Peace, Memory: Reflections on the eacekP eeping Monument in Ottawa." Canadian Military History 11, 3 (2002) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gough: Peackeeping, Peace, Memory Peacekeeping, Peace, Memory Reflections on the Peacekeeping Monument in Ottawa Paul Gough The Announcement In 1988, the Nobel Peace Prize was ince 1948, under the auspices of the awarded to the United Nations to mark United Nations (UN), Canada has S 40 years of international peacekeeping. contributed over 80,000 men and That same year the Department of women from all branches of the armed National Defence (DND) announced that forces to global peacekeeping. During a monument would be erected in the 1950s and 1960s, Canada was, in Ottawa, dedicated to Canadian forces fact, the greatest contributor of 'Blue that had served in peacekeeping duties. Helmet' soldiers to UN peacekeeping endeavours DND launched the so-called "Peacekeepers and became the undisputed leader in global Monument" competition in 1990, managed by a peacekeeping. Although peacekeeping was never committee consisting of representatives from the sole preoccupation of Canada's foreign policy, DND, the National Capital Commission, and Canadian politicians liked to be seen as Public Works Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Report
    September 14, 2017 ORIGINAL REPORT Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment 3311 Greenbank Road, Lots 12 and 13, Concession 2, Nepean Township, Carleton County City of Ottawa, Ontario Licensee: Aaron Mior (P1077) PIF Number: P1077-0024-2017 Submitted to: Catherine Tremblay Land Development Project Coordinator Minto Communities - Canada 200-180 Kent St. Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B6 Report Number: 1775745 Distribution: 1 e-copy - Minto Communities REPORT 3 copies - Minto Communities 1 copy - City of Ottawa 1 e-copy - Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 1 e-copy - Golder Associates Ltd. STAGE 1 AND 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 3311 GREENBANK ROAD Executive Summary The Executive Summary highlights key points from the report only; for complete information and findings, as well as the limitations, the reader should examine the complete report. Golder Associates Limited (Golder) was retained by Minto Communities Canada (“Minto”) to complete a Stage 1 and 2 archaeological assessment for the property located at 3311 Greenbank Road. The subject property is located within part of Lots 12 and 13, Concession 2 (Rideau Front), Nepean Township, Carleton County, City of Ottawa (Map 1, p.27). The subject property encompasses approximately 5.55 hectares (13.7 acres) and is proposed to be incorporated into a residential development. The western limit of the study area is located immediately east of Greenbank Road and approximately 600 meters south of the intersection with Jockvale Road, with the eastern limit extending to Jockvale Road. The northern portion of the study area is bound by St. Joseph’s Intermediate School, with the southern boundary represented by undeveloped land owned by the City of Ottawa (Maps 2-3, p.28-29).
    [Show full text]
  • Nepean Point
    ON DESIGN COMPETITION NEPEAN POINT STAGE 01 - REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - AL1682 // 19.01.2017 Request for Qualifications - Stage 01 1 Cover: View of Nepean Point ON POINT ON POINT Design Competition for Nepean Point Stage 01 - Request for Qualifications - AL1682 19.01.2017 Nepean Point - Detail of existing fence TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Summary........................................................................................... p.06 01. Canada’s Capital ........................................................................... p.09 02. The Project .................................................................................... p.13 03. The Design Competition ................................................................ p.29 04. Stakeholders and Partners ........................................................... p.39 05. Additional Information ................................................................... p.46 Appendix 1 - Jury Biographies ............................................................ p.49 A SUMMARY The National Capital Commission (NCC) is pleased to launch the first COMPETITION PROCESS phase of a two-stage international design competition for Nepean Point, a promontory at the symbolic heart of Canada’s Capital, Ottawa. In the midst All interested design teams are invited to participate, but teams must be of numerous important public and private cultural institutions, the Nepean led by a landscape architect eligible to be licensed in Ontario, Canada. Point competition site, including two entranceways, is
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments and Memories in Ontario, 1850-2001
    FORGING ICONOGRAPHIES AND CASTING COLONIALISM: MONUMENTS AND MEMORIES IN ONTARIO, 1850-2001 By Brittney Anne Bos A thesis submitted to the Department of History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September 2016) Copyright ©Brittney Anne Bos, 2016 ii Abstract Commemorations are a critical window for exploring the social, political, and cultural trends of a specific time period. Over the past two centuries, the commemorative landscape of Ontario reaffirmed the inclusion/exclusion of particular racial groups. Intended as static markers to the past, monuments in particular visually demonstrated the boundaries of a community and acted as ongoing memorials to existing social structures. Using a specific type of iconography and visual language, the creators of monuments imbued the physical markers of stone and bronze with racialized meanings. As builders were connected with their own time periods and social contexts, the ideas behind these commemorations shifted. Nonetheless, creators were intent on producing a memorial that educated present and future generations on the boundaries of their “imagined communities.” This dissertation considers the carefully chosen iconographies of Ontario’s monuments and how visual symbolism was attached to historical memory. Through the examination of five case studies, this dissertation examines the shifting commemorative landscape of Ontario and how memorials were used to mark the boundaries of communities. By integrating the visual analysis of monuments and related images, it bridges a methodological and theoretical gap between history and art history. This dissertation opens an important dialogue between these fields of study and demonstrates how monuments themselves are critical “documents” of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Artwork Property of WHERE™ Magazine © Concept Original De WHEREMC Magazine Lac Mahon Lac Lac- Lake Grand Des-Loups Lake Lake 105 307 Mayo R
    F-12 5 Lac Leamy ST. RAYMOND Edmonton 50 ER GAMELIN EB Boul. du Casino GR Vers / To Montréal Rivière des Outaouais Île Kettle Island MONTCLAIR Boul. de la Carrière B Ottawa River is so n R IE N R U Vers / To O Parc de la F Gatineau P RO QUÉBEC Park M. D Laramée E R SAINT-RAYMOND Chauveau Émile-Bond OC KC LIF ONTARIO FE The Rockeries SA Parc de Les rocailles Université CRÉ Rockcliffe -CŒ du Québec UR Park en Outauais RCMP, Canadian PR OM Police College . D Boucherville K E GRC, Collège R ALEXANDRE-TACHÉ O canadien de police C Canada Aviation AYLMER ALLUMETTIÈRES K P C o Lac and Space Museum n L L t RCMP I M McKay F Musée de l’aviation et Aéroport de a Musical F c E de l’espace du Canada MAISONNEUVE d Lake Rockcliffe Ride Centre o P Parc n Airport SAINT-JOSEPH a Centre du K ld W Park -C Carrousel a Île Green M Y r . Jacques-Cartier t ackay O ie de la GRC r Island Monument B Brid CAPITAL SIGHTS r into ges P id M LUCERNE à la paix a g s ATTRACTIONS DE LA CAPITALE P pi e t Crichton R o n ? n i et au souvenir e o d N n au ea O t P u ByWard Market HE I Rivière des Outaouais . ML T C O Gatineau DR Stanley CK IA h Marché By V Parc X Parc New A a E L’ mp Brébeuf S Edinburgh E MONTCALM S Canadian Museum of History D U Park P .
    [Show full text]
  • J1ke1fca JPLAN Oj . .§U1f:If;/Jor I
    ; . i I I j1KE1fCA JPLAN oJ ..§U1f:if;/Jor 1 WATR. .MEMO IRifAJL.. I \ '\ \ • \ I l I 1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ro ck ...o l 1t1:, I t. \ I l I 1 I 1 · Oaks' <> .., 027 EMJneer' s Departmsnt THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF OAK BAY BYLAW NO. 4205 A Bylaw to designate portions of municipal property as protected heritage sites WHEREAS a local government may designate real property in whole or in part ns protected pursuant to Section 967 of the Local Government Act; and WHEREAS the Municipal Council of The Corporation of the District of Oak Bao' considers that the real property described herein has sufficient heritage value and heritage character to warrant heritage designa~ ~~~~ : NOW TIIBREFORE the Municipal Council of The Corporation of the Distri<rt of Oak Bay, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: · 1 The following real property is hereby designated as protected pursuant to Part 27 of the Local Government Act: (1) the stone pier and iron gate structures situate on the portion of L[ot 2, Sections 2 and 61, Victoria District, Plan 11985, shown shaded grey on the plan atta&hed as Schedule "A" to this Bylaw (the "Bowker Gates''); (2) the World War II Observation Post situate on the portion of Lof 1, Section 46, Victoria District, Plan 6325 (except part in Plan 32428), shown shaded grey on the plan attached as Schedule "B" to this Bylaw (the "Gonzales Observation Post"}! (3) the "Uplands" stone and concrete gate posts, and where applicabJe the iron fencing, situ­ ate on the portions of highway shown shaded grey on the plan attached as
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Heritage Value Assessment: Prince of Wales Bridge
    – DRAFT DRAFT - PRELIMINARY HERITAGE VALUE ASSESSMENT PRINCE OF WALES BRIDGE, OTTAWA, ON - GATINEAU, QC 2.1. HERITAGE PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. LAND USE PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. HERITAGE RESOURCE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 11 4.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 12 4.3. IMPACT OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON IDENTIFIED HERITAGE VALUE: SUMMARY ............................ 13 4.4. OPPORTUNITIES FOR MITIGATION ............................................................................................................. 15 4.5. PRECENDENCE & LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................. 16 4.6. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 16 APPENDIX “A” - 125TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE OPENING OF THE POW BRIDGE ...................................................... 18 APPENDIX “B” - PRINCE OF WALES BRIDGE ............................................................................................................ 29 APPENDIX “C” - SLEEPING PRINCE - A
    [Show full text]