WHICH IS OLDER, JUBILEES OR the GENESIS APOCRYPHON? One of the First Dead Sea Scrolls Texts to Be Discovered in the Qumran Caves

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHICH IS OLDER, JUBILEES OR the GENESIS APOCRYPHON? One of the First Dead Sea Scrolls Texts to Be Discovered in the Qumran Caves chapter five WHICH IS OLDER, JUBILEES OR THE GENESIS APOCRYPHON? One of the Þrst Dead Sea Scrolls texts to be discovered in the Qumran caves came to be known as the Genesis Apocryphon (Q). Almost from the time of the Apocryphon’s discovery, scholars began to notice similar- ities between it and the book of Jubilees. ough clearly dierent—the Apocryphon consists primarily of a series of Þrst-person narratives in Aramaic, allegedly written by dierent biblical Þgures recounting epi- sodes from their lives—the two texts seemed to share a wealth of com- mon lore and common biblical interpretations. is naturally led to spec- ulation about which author had borrowed from the other, or whether they had both borrowed from a common, now-lost source.1 On this question researchers have been, and still are, fundamentally divided. Among those who have maintained the priority of the Apocryphon over Jubilees are B.Z. Wacholder,2 P. Grelot,3 G. Vermes,4 and, more recently, C. Werman.5 ose who have taken the opposite position include J. Fitzmyer,6 G.W.E. Nickelsburg,7 and C.A. Evans.8 Still others, 1 Speculation has also focused on the Apocryphon’s relationship to another text, the account of Noah’s birth in Enoch chapters –. I deal brießy with the connection between the Apocryphon and Enoch – later in this chapter. 2 B.Z. Wacholder, “How Long Did Abram Stay in Egypt,” HUCA (): [– ]. 3 P. Grelot, Review of J.A. Fitzmyer, e Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave , in RB (): . 4 G. Vermes, Scripture and Tradition (StPB ; Leiden: Brill, ), . 5 C. Werman, “Qumran and the Book of Noah,” in Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: e Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha in the Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of the Orion Center, – January (ed. M.E. Stone and E.G. Chazon; STDJ ; Leiden: Brill, ), –. 6 J.A. Fitzmyer, e Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave (Rome: PontiÞcal Biblical Institute, ), . 7 G.W.E. Nickelsburg, “Patriarchs Who Worry About eir Wives,” in Biblical Per- spectives: Early Use and Interpretation of the Bible in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls (ed. M.E. Stone and E.G. Chazon; Leiden: Brill, ), [–]. 8 C.A. Evans, “e Genesis Apocryphon and the Rewritten Bible,” RevQ (): [–]. chapter five including F. García Martínez,9 have suggested that the two texts drew on a common source. One particular focus for comparison has been the two texts’ account of the division of the world among Noah’s sons and grandsons, since both the Apocryphon and Jubilees contain a wealth of geographic details in their accounts that are not present in the Bible. ree recent studies have focused on this issue. Daniel Machiela has sought to reconstruct the map of the world underlying the two texts; his conclusion is appro- priately tentative, but he ultimately suggests that the similarities between the two texts are best explained by postulating the existence of a common source from which the two drew some of their material.10 Esther Eshel, in a article on the same topic, has come down on the side of the Apocryphon’s priority to Jubilees, though she also points out the similar- ity between the world map found in the Apocryphon and in Josephus’s much later account of the division of the world in his Jewish Antiqui- ties :–; Josephus diers from the Apocryphon, she notes, only in small details, and “these are due to the diering amounts of detail pro- vided.”11 is actually seems to me a compelling argument against equat- ing the more Hellenistic map of the Apocryphon with priority. e same argument holds for a still more recent study, an attempt by Cana Wer- man to reinforce her previous conclusion about the Apocryphon’s pri- ority to Jubilees via a detailed examination of the world map in both.12 9 F. García Martínez, Qumran and Apocalyptic: Studies in the Aramaic from Qumran (Leiden: Brill, ), –. 10 D. Machiela, “e Genesis Apocryphon (Q): A Reevaluation of its Text, Inter- pretive Character, and Relationship to the Book of Jubilees” (PhD Dissertation, Notre Dame University, ), –. 11 E. Eshel, “e Imago Mundi of the Genesis Apocryphon,” in Heavenly Tablets: Interpretation, Identitiy and Tradition in Ancient Judaism (ed. L. LiDonnici and Andrea Lieber; Leiden: Brill, ), [–]. 12 C. Werman, “e Book of Jubilees and its Aramaic Sources,” Meghillot – (): –. Werman seeks to show that the author of Jubilees “Judaized” the Ionian world map as presented in the Apocryphon. at is certainly one possible explanation for the dierences between the two—though her construction of the evidence certainly deserves further scrutiny—but it is only one explanation. It is just as possible that the author of the Apocryphon sought to bring the map of his “Judaizing” source text (that is, Jubilees) more in line with the widely known Ionian map precisely because he had none of the anti- Hellenizing concerns so amply evidenced in Jubilees. It may also be that the Apocryphon departed from Jubilees (though the extant of his departure is very dicult to pin down because of the many lacunae) in an attempt to “modernize” the map in the light of subsequent developments in cartography. Finally, it should be clear that neither Jubilees nor the Apocryphon was the originator of this world map: both texts ultimately owe their maps to a Greek model that had been around since the late sixth century bce.
Recommended publications
  • Download File
    THE BOOK OF JUBILEES AMONG THE APOCALYPSES VOLUME II A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Todd Russell Hanneken James C. VanderKam, Director Graduate Program in Theology Notre Dame, Indiana June 2008 CONTENTS Volume II Chapter 5: The Spatial Axis.............................................................................................261 5.1. Angels and demons............................................................................................264 5.1.1. Before the flood: the origin of evil..........................................................265 5.1.1.1. The Enochic apocalypses ..............................................................265 5.1.1.2. The Danielic apocalypses..............................................................268 5.1.1.3. Jubilees..........................................................................................269 5.1.2. After the flood: the persistence of demons..............................................272 5.1.2.1. The early apocalypses ...................................................................273 5.1.2.2. Jubilees..........................................................................................274 5.1.3. Angelic mediation ...................................................................................277 5.1.3.1. Evidence outside the apocalypses .................................................277 5.1.3.2. The early apocalypses ...................................................................281
    [Show full text]
  • University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich
    Oliver, I W; Bachmann, V (2009). The Book of Jubilees: An Annotated Bibliography from the First German Translation of 1850 to the Enoch Seminar of 2007. Henoch, 31(1):123-164. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. Zurich Open Repository and Archive http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Henoch 2009, 31(1):123-164. Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich http://www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2009 The Book of Jubilees: An Annotated Bibliography from the First German Translation of 1850 to the Enoch Seminar of 2007 Oliver, I W; Bachmann, V Oliver, I W; Bachmann, V (2009). The Book of Jubilees: An Annotated Bibliography from the First German Translation of 1850 to the Enoch Seminar of 2007. Henoch, 31(1):123-164. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Henoch 2009, 31(1):123-164. THE BOOK OF JUBILEES: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY FROM THE FIRST GERMAN TRANSLATION OF 1850 TO THE ENOCH SEMINAR OF 2007 ISAAC W. OLIVER , University of Michigan VERONIKA BACHMANN , University of Zurich The following annotated bibliography provides summaries of the most influential scholarly works dedicated to the Book of Jubilees written between 1850 and 2006. * The year 1850 opens the period of modern research on Jubilees thanks to Dillmann’s translation of the Ethiopic text of Jubilees into German; the Enoch Seminar of 2007 represents the largest gathering of international scholars on the document in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Jewish Writings
    EARLY JEWISH WRITINGS Press SBL T HE BIBLE AND WOMEN A n Encyclopaedia of Exegesis and Cultural History Edited by Christiana de Groot, Irmtraud Fischer, Mercedes Navarro Puerto, and Adriana Valerio Volume 3.1: Early Jewish Writings Press SBL EARLY JEWISH WRITINGS Edited by Eileen Schuller and Marie-Theres Wacker Press SBL Atlanta Copyright © 2017 by SBL Press A ll rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office,S BL Press, 825 Hous- ton Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Schuller, Eileen M., 1946- editor. | Wacker, Marie-Theres, editor. Title: Early Jewish writings / edited by Eileen Schuller and Marie-Theres Wacker. Description: Atlanta : SBL Press, [2017] | Series: The Bible and women Number 3.1 | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. Identifiers:L CCN 2017019564 (print) | LCCN 2017020850 (ebook) | ISBN 9780884142324 (ebook) | ISBN 9781628371833 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780884142331 (hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Bible. Old Testament—Feminist criticism. | Women in the Bible. | Women in rabbinical literature. Classification: LCC BS521.4 (ebook) | LCC BS521.4 .E27 2017 (print) | DDC 296.1082— dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017019564 Press Printed on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies
    0 Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies Bibliography largely taken from Dr. James R. Davila's annotated bibliographies: http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/~www_sd/otpseud.html. I have changed formatting, added the section on 'Online works,' have added a sizable amount to the secondary literature references in most of the categories, and added the Table of Contents. - Lee Table of Contents Online Works……………………………………………………………………………………………...02 General Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...…03 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………....03 Translations of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha in Collections…………………………………….…03 Guide Series…………………………………………………………………………………………….....04 On the Literature of the 2nd Temple Period…………………………………………………………..........04 Literary Approaches and Ancient Exegesis…………………………………………………………..…...05 On Greek Translations of Semitic Originals……………………………………………………………....05 On Judaism and Hellenism in the Second Temple Period…………………………………………..…….06 The Book of 1 Enoch and Related Material…………………………………………………………….....07 The Book of Giants…………………………………………………………………………………..……09 The Book of the Watchers…………………………………………………………………………......….11 The Animal Apocalypse…………………………………………………………………………...………13 The Epistle of Enoch (Including the Apocalypse of Weeks)………………………………………..…….14 2 Enoch…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..15 5-6 Ezra (= 2 Esdras 1-2, 15-16, respectively)……………………………………………………..……..17 The Treatise of Shem………………………………………………………………………………..…….18 The Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37-71)…………………………………………………………..…...18 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Biblical Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church
    Anke Wanger THE-733 1 Student Name: ANKE WANGER Student Country: ETHIOPIA Program: MTH Course Code or Name: THE-733 This paper uses [x] US or [ ] UK standards for spelling and punctuation The Biblical Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church 1) Introduction The topic of Biblical canon formation is a wide one, and has received increased attention in the last few decades, as many ancient manuscripts have been discovered, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, and the question arose as to whether the composition of the current Biblical canon(s) should be re-evaluated based on these and other findings. Not that the question had actually been settled before, as can be observed from the various Church councils throughout the last two thousand years with their decisions, and the fact that different Christian denominations often have very different books included in their Biblical Canons. Even Churches who are in communion with each other disagree over the question of which books belong in the Holy Bible. One Church which occupies a unique position in this regard is the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church. Currently, it is the only Church whose Bible is comprised of Anke Wanger THE-733 2 81 Books in total, 46 in the Old Testament, and 35 in the New Testament.1 It is also the biggest Bible, according to the number of books: Protestant Bibles usually contain 66 books, Roman Catholic Bibles 73, and Eastern Orthodox Bibles have around 76 books, sometimes more, sometimes less, depending on their belonging to the Greek Orthodox, Slavonic Orthodox, or Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • Intertextuality in the Book of Jubilees
    Intertextuality in the Book of Jubilees Pieter M Venter Department of Old Testament Studies University of Pretoria Abstract Intertextuality in the Book of Jubilees The second century BCE Book of Jubilees presents the contents of Genesis-Exodus in a new form. This article studies the techniques used in Jubilees 23. It indicates how Psalm 90:10 was used to link the death of Abraham to a declining-inclining scheme of longevity. This scheme was then combined with a heptadic jubilee scheme. To this the author added a Deuteronomistic retributive scheme of sin- punishment-repentance-salvation. On this combination an apocal- yptic framework was finally superimposed. 1. INTRODUCTION The Book of Jubilees belongs to the pseudepigrapha. It is part of the Ethiopian Canon. The book has only survived in its entirety in classical Ethiopic (Ge’ez). It enjoyed canonical status in the Abyssinian Church and later among the Falashas (the black Jews of Ethiopia). It was probably rendered into Ethiopic very early in the Christian history of that land, perhaps 500 AD (cf VanderKam 1985:112). It was originally written in Hebrew during the middle of the second century BCE. Fragments of the book were found in 18 manuscripts in the caves at Qumran. The oldest of these comes from approximately 100 BCE (cf VanderKam 1985:115). The book is in essence a re-writing of the materials in Genesis-Exodus 19. It was classified by Vermez as “Rewritten Bible”, one of the “parabiblical writings” (Trebolle-Barrera 2000:102), in which we find “rewriting with intent and purpose in mind” (Endres 1987:15).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rewritten Bible at Qumran
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department Classics and Religious Studies 1998 The Rewritten Bible at Qumran Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classics Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "The Rewritten Bible at Qumran" (1998). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 91. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in THE HEBREW BIBLE AND QUMRAN, edited by James H. Charlesworth (Bibal Press, 1998), pp. 173-195. Copyright (c) 1998 James H. Charlesworth. The Rewritten Bible at Qumran Sidnie White Crawford ince the discovery of the scrolls from the Qumran caves in the late 1940s and earl y-to-mid 50s, the process of sort­ ~ ing, identifying, and editing the fragmentary manuscripts has occupied the attention of scholars. Now, as that period in the histOlY of scroll s scholarship draws to a close, more and more attention has turned to the contents of the texts from the eleven caves ill the vicinity of Khirbet Qumran as a collection. Several things may be said about this collection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Interpretation of Jubilees in 4Q390*
    THE STATUS AND INTERPRETATION OF JUBILEES IN 4Q390* Todd R. Hanneken The study of the book of Jubilees connects several areas of scholarship on Jewish thought and literature in antiquity. The Dead Sea Scrolls cast light on our understanding of Ethiopic Jubilees, and Ethiopic Jubilees casts light on our understanding of the Scrolls. Jubilees witnesses to the growing authority of the Pentateuch, and the ongoing pluriformity of texts. Jubilees can be studied as interpretation, and also as a source for interpretation. This contribution addresses the authority of Jubilees as reflected in the way it is used in 4Q390. Parallels between Jubilees and 4Q390 have long been noted. Careful examination of the parallels indicates that 4Q390 interprets Jubilees as Scripture. 1 The two parts of this essay treat two major foundations of this claim. The first is the way 4Q390 continuously adopts language and themes from Jubilees. The second is the way 4Q390 wrestles with the plain sense of the text to fit a different set of beliefs. This creative adaptation does not negate the claim that Jubilees was used as authoritative literature, but rather strengthens it. One measure of a text's authoritativeness is the attention paid to adapting it to fit new and different meanings.2 This example from 4Q390 has broader implications. It adds to the evi­ dence challenging the use of the category "biblical" in the study of the Scrolls, especially if the category excludes Jubilees. The appreciation of 4Q390 as a form of scriptural interpretation in turn casts light on our understanding of scriptural interpretation in general.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Kingdom of Priests" in the Book of Jubilees the "Kingdom of Priests"
    THE "KINGDOM OF PRIESTS" IN THE BOOK OF JUBILEES THE "KINGDOM OF PRIESTS" IN THE BOOK OF JUBILEES By CHRISTINE BOLTON, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Master ofArts McMaster University © Copyright by Christine Bolton, September 2004 MASTER OF ARTS (2004) McMaster University (Religious Studies) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The "Kingdom of Priests" in the Book of Jubilees AUTHOR: Christine Bolton, B.A. (University of British Columbia) SUPERVISOR: Professor E. Schuller NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 97 ii Abstract This thesis explores the concept of the "kingdom of priests," as presented by the Second Century BCE text, The Book ofJubilees. It is argued that this phrase, drawn from Exod 19, has been interpreted by the author of Jubilees to mean that any male member of Israel may potentially serve as a priest. This priestly role, however, cannot be actualized due to the sinfulness of Israel, particularly in its association with and acceptance of gentiles and gentile practices. The model of a priestly Israel is presented in Jubilees through its portrayals of the major figures of biblical history as priests. This thesis will explore these priestly portrayals, with special attention given to Adam, in order to demonstrate that Jubilees believed all of Israel to have priestly potential. iii Acknowledgements I owe a great deal of gratitude, first and foremost, to my supervisor, Dr. Eileen Schuller. It is her guidance, support and patience that have made this thesis what it is. I wish to thank my committee members, Drs. Annette Reed and Stephen Westerholm for their enthusiasm and insight.
    [Show full text]
  • Enoch and Jubilees in the Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church*
    ENOCH AND JUBILEES IN THE CANON OF THE ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH* Leslie Baynes Traditionally the Ethiopian Orthodox Church has numbered eighty- one books in its biblical canon. Often, but not always, its canon lists include 1 Enoch (Ge‘ez Henoch) and Jubilees (Ge‘ez Kufale), making it the only community in modern Christendom that holds them in such high regard. Since these two books are part of the living tradition of a contemporary religious group, we have a unique opportunity to investigate how they function in it by speaking with the very people who use them. This study investigates the Ethiopian concept of canon and the place and function of 1 Enoch and Jubilees in it as assessed by scholarly and ecclesiastical works. We also consider the perspectives of clergy and laity in Ethiopia and the United States in order to illus- trate, underscore, and contrast the evaluation of these writings with those of the standard textual sources.1 This study demonstrates that the Ethiopian concept of canon differs from western and even other eastern Christian traditions, and that the primary readers of 1 Enoch and Jubilees traditionally have been the scholarly elite, as is true of their readers today. In terms of interpretation, the primary (though not the only) significance of the two books in Ethiopian thought has been christological. It may be helpful to begin with a very brief overview of Enochic literature and Jubilees and their reception in the early church, both Western and Eastern. Enochic booklets and Jubilees are ancient Jewish works. The earliest sections of what became 1 Enoch date to the fourth century b.c.e.2 Jubilees can be dated more precisely, probably to about * Jim VanderKam’s contributions to the study of 1 Enoch and Jubilees need no elaboration here.
    [Show full text]
  • Purity and Nationalism in Second Temple Literature: 1–2 Maccabees and Jubilees
    JETS 46/3 (September 2003) 401–21 PURITY AND NATIONALISM IN SECOND TEMPLE LITERATURE: 1–2 MACCABEES AND JUBILEES joseph hellerman* In 167 bc, at the instigation of an influential faction of Jewish elites, the Syrian king, Antiochus IV, began a program of forced Hellenization which prohibited behaviors and altered institutions that were particularly defining for Jewish identity: . the king sent letters by messengers to Jerusalem and the cities of Judah; he directed them to follow customs strange to the land, to forbid burnt offer- ings and sacrifices and drink offerings in the sanctuary, to profane sabbaths and feasts, to defile the sanctuary and the priests, to build altars and sacred precincts and shrines for idols, to sacrifice swine and unclean animals, and to leave their sons uncircumcised (1 Macc 1:44–48).1 The king also proscribed Jewish dietary laws, and the eating of unclean food became something of a litmus test for faithfulness to Antiochus’s directives. Finally, imperial authorities destroyed copies of the Torah—the sacred source for Jewish religious practices—and determined possession of the law to be a capital offense. Antiochus’s goal was transparently socio-political: “that [his whole king- dom] should be one people, and that each should give up his customs” (1 Macc 1:41–42).2 The king perceptively discerned that, in order to achieve his de- sired ends, he would have to abolish traditional Jewish distinctions between sacred and profane foods, times, and places. For the “customs” associated with these distinctions (along with male circumcision) had served to set apart Jewish inhabitants of the empire as the chosen people of Yahweh and thereby obstruct any attempt to render the Jews “one people” with their Greek overlords.3 * Joseph Hellerman is professor of New Testament Language and Literature, Talbot School of Theology, 13800 Biola Avenue, La Mirada, CA 90639.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Jubilees and the Midrash on the Early Chapters of Genesis
    THE BOOK OF JUBILEES AND THE MIDRASH ON THE EARLY CHAPTERS OF GENESIS ZVI RON The Book of Jubilees is a retelling of Genesis and the beginning of Exodus in the form of an angel speaking to Moses. It was written by a Jew in Hebrew some time around the early second century BCE, perhaps even earlier. The original Hebrew is lost to us today; our translations are based primarily on Ethiopic texts. The main focus of the work is to demonstrate that the narra- tives in the early part of the Bible contain legal instruction, although the legal elements are hidden in the biblical narrative.1 Jubilees often supplements the biblical narratives with additional information, in much the same way as the Midrash; at other times Jubilees provides a resolution to a difficulty in the biblical text, another concern of the Midrash. As such, the Book of Jubilees may be categorized as an early form of midrashic literature.2 Some of the interpretations in Jubilees are, in fact, preserved in later midrashic literature. The title "Book of Jubilees" reflects the author's particular way of viewing the chronology of the world as a series of forty-nine year cycles, but it was also sometimes referred to as "The Little Genesis" (Bereshit Zuta in Arama- ic),3 since it is an abbreviated retelling of Genesis.4 Jubilees was not incorpo- rated into rabbinic literature, as it differs in some very fundamental legal points, most famously its insistence on a purely solar calendar, as opposed to the rabbinic lunar/solar model,5 and stringencies regarding Shabbat ob- servance.6 In this article we will show how Jubilees dealt with various diffi- culties in the text of Genesis in ways sometimes similar to and sometimes very different from the later rabbinic midrashic literature.
    [Show full text]