DOCSLIB.ORG

Conflict and Compromise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conflict and Compromise Conflict and Compromise Regionalism and Differing Attitudes About the U.S. What was the western view on public lands? Western farmers wanted: – Cheap land – Rapid settlement – Right of the people to settle on any unoccupied acres they could find. What view did Eastern manufacturers and farmers have on public land? Eastern manufacturers: – Opposed cheap land for fear that it would draw off their labor supply. – Eastern farmers believed that cheap Western lands would result in unfair competition. What view did Southerners have on public lands? Plantation owners wanted public lands opened for sale. Opposed people taking what ever land they could find because they might claim the best lands. What was the regional view on protective tariffs? North: Wanted them to ensure that their factories could compete successfully with foreign manufacturers. South: Opposed high tariffs because they would have to pay more for imported, manufactured goods. Northwestern: In favor of protection hoping that tariff revenues would be used to build roads and canals and hopefully increase the urban markets for farm products. What did each region feel about the expansion of slavery into the West? North: – Not economically dependent on the slaves. – A conviction that slavery was morally wrong. – Did not want slavery extended into new territories South: – Wanted to be able to take their slaves anywhere except the free states – A fear that there will be no new slave states meaning the political power of the South would decrease. West: – Felt the same way as the North for the most part. What territory applied for statehood in 1819? Missouri What was the Tallmadge Amendment? “And provided, That the further introduction of slavery or involuntary servitude be prohibited, except for the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been fully [duly] convicted; and that all children born within the said State, after the admission thereof into the Union, shall be free at the age of twenty-five years.” Representative James Tallmadge New York What part of Massachusetts wanted to separate and become a state? Northern part known as Maine What was representation like in the Congress in 1819? House of Senate: Representatives: – Representation was – The North’s population equal due to an equal gave it a majority in number of slave and the House. free states in the Union. – 13 Slave – 13 Free What were the terms of the Missouri Compromise? Maine enters the Union as a free state. Missouri enters the Union as a slave state. Slavery in the Louisiana Purchase above 36 degrees and 30 minutes north would be forbidden. What is the Wilmot Proviso? This bill provided that all territory gained from Mexico should be closed to slavery. – Passed in the House of Representatives • North had control of the House – Failed in the Senate • Equal representation in the North and South David C. Wilmot Wilmot Proviso (continued) The Mexican Cession: Slave or Free? What were the similarities between the Townsend Amendment and the Wilmot Proviso? Both were bills that tried to restrict the spread of slavery. Both were passed by the House of Representatives Both failed in the Senate Both incensed the South leading to threats of secession and bloodshed. What did both the Democrats and Whigs do in the 1848 election about slavery and why? They both tried to downplay or avoid the issue. Would not lose votes that way. Who were the two candidates for President in 1848? Whigs: Zachary Taylor Democrats: Lewis Cass What new party emerged and what was their platform and candidate? Free Soil Party Platform: – No expansion of slavery into the territories. – antislavery Martin Van Buren Who won the election and why? Zachary Taylor – Martin Van Buren split the Northern vote between himself and Lewis Cass. – Taylor gets the Southern vote. Who returned to a political career to save the Union? Compromise of 1850 The admission of California as a free state with the compromise that the rest of the territory (New Mexico and Utah would be open to slavery and decided by popular sovereignty. Texas to give up its claim to New Mexico in exchange for federal assumption of its ten million dollars of public debt. The banning of the slave trade in D.C. A new fugitive slave law. The Compromise could never have gotten past President Taylor. While a southerner and slaveholder himself, he had no sympathy for the South and saw no reason why the South needed to be bribed to admit California. He referred with disdain to the Compromise as the "Omnibus Bill." But "Old Rough and Ready," sixty-five years old did not live long enough to block the Compromise. Death of Zachary Taylor On 4 July 1850, the President was subject to several hours of oratory in the broiling sun - part of the days celebration. Because of the heat he consumed an excessive amount of cucumber salad and iced milk. Washington was a city with open sewers swarming with flies in the Summer. The City had been built on a swamp and was extremely unhealthy in the hot summer months. The President came down with acute gastroenteritis. He would most probably have recovered if simply left to himself. Unfortunately, no President is ever left to himself. The physicians of the Capital descended upon the poor man. He never had a chance. They rallied around his bedside like the flies in the nearby swamp. Drugged with large doses of ipecac, calomel, opium, and quinine, and bled and blistered to boot, the poor man didn't have a chance. Taylor was given 40 grains of opium per dosing. Today doctors prescribe morphine in doses of 1/4 grain. One grain is 60 milligrams. The average aspirin dose is 5 grains (imagine 16 aspirin size pills of opium). The quinine was prescribed to stop the fever and sweating. After a few days of the finest medical care money could buy, the President gave up the ghost leaving the office to Millard Fillmore who quickly signed the compromise package into law Why did citizens in the North object to the Fugitive Slave Law, and how did they resist it? The word of a slave owner was taken as conclusive proof of the identity of the runaway. A suspected runaway had no right to testify in their own behalf. Any person might be required to join in pursuit of a runaway. Fugitive Slave Law (continued) Personal liberty laws that forbid state officials from assisting in the capture of runaways. Work to nullify the law in their own state. Direct resistance: – Oberlin, Ohio. Oberlin, Ohio: Rescuing Slaves. Who was Dred Scott and why did he sue his master? He was an enslaved man taken by his former master from the state of Missouri into territory closed to slavery and then back into Missouri again. For eleven years Scott and his wife sued for their freedom with the case ending at the Supreme Court. What was the Dred Scott decision? Scott had no right to sue in a federal court because he was not a citizen of the United States. He also ruled that a ban on slavery in the territories was unconstitutional throwing out the Missouri Compromise. He also declared that Scott was never free due to the fact that slaves were personal property. Roger Taney What was the reaction in the North to the Dred Scott decision? Northerners were more bitter about slavery. The Republican party might as well go out of existence because the concept of free soil was unconstitutional. Even the principle of popular sovereignty was called in to question. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dispute Over the Annexation of Texas and Opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's Independence, the Nueces River Was R
    American Studies Mr. Carlson The Dispute over the Annexation of Texas and opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's independence, the Nueces River was recognized as the northern boundary of Mexico. Spain had fixed the Nueces as a border in 1816, and the United States ratified it in the 1819 treaty by which the United States had purchased Florida and renounced claims to Texas. Even following Mexico's independence from Spain, American and European cartographers fixed the Texas border at the Nueces. When Texas declared its independence, however, it claimed as its territory an additional 150 miles of land, to the Rio Grande. With the annexation of Texas in 1845, the United States adopted Texas's position and claimed the Rio Grande as the border. Mexico broke diplomatic relations with the United States and refused to recognize either the Texas annexation or the Rio Grande border. President James Polk sent a special envoy, John L. Slidell, to propose cancellation of Mexico's debt to United States citizens who had incurred damages during the Mexican Revolution, provided Mexico would formally recognize the Rio Grande boundary. Slidell was also authorized to offer the Mexican government up to $30 million for California and New Mexico. Between Slidell's arrival on December 6, 1845, and his departure in March 1846, the regime of President Jose Herrara was overthrown and a fervently nationalistic government under General Mariano Paredes seized power. Neither leader would speak to Slidell. When Paredes publicly reaffirmed Mexico's claim to all of Texas, Slidell left in a temper, convinced that Mexico should be "chastised." American Studies Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Slaveholding Presidents Gleaves Whitney Grand Valley State University
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Ask Gleaves Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies 7-19-2006 Slaveholding Presidents Gleaves Whitney Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/ask_gleaves Recommended Citation Whitney, Gleaves, "Slaveholding Presidents" (2006). Ask Gleaves. Paper 30. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/ask_gleaves/30 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ask Gleaves by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Slaveholding Presidents - Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies - Grand Valley State... Page 1 of 1 Slaveholding Presidents How many of our presidents owned slaves? There are two ways of interpreting your question. Either: How many presidents owned slaves at some point in their lives? Or: How many presidents owned slaves while serving as chief executive? Many books get the answers to these questions wrong, and when I speak on the presidents and ask these two questions, audiences invariably low-ball the answer to both. It comes as a shock to most Americans' sensibilities that more than one in four U.S. presidents were slaveholder: 12 owned slaves at some point in their lives. Significantly, 8 presidents owned slaves while living in the Executive Mansion. Put another way, for 50 of the first 60 years of the new republic, the president was a slaveholder. Following is the number of slaves each of the 12 slaveholding presidents owned. (CAPS indicate the George Washington, depicted here at president owned slaves while serving as the chief executive):[1] his Mount Vernon estate, owned between 250 and 350 slaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Guide
    C a p t i o n e d M e d i a P r o g r a m VOICE (800) 237-6213 TTY (800) 237-6819 FAX (800) 538-5636 E-MAIL [email protected] WEB www.captionedmedia.org #12136 W. H. HARRISON, TYLER, POLK, & TAYLOR NEW DIMENSION MEDIA/QUESTAR, 2003 Grade Level: 3–8 12 Minutes CAPTIONED MEDIA PROGRAM RELATED RESOURCES #12119 A. JOHNSON, GRANT, & HAYES #12120 ABRAHAM LINCOLN #12121 ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP: MAKING A DIFFERENCE #12122 CARTER, REAGAN, & G.H. BUSH #12123 CLEVELAND, MCKINLEY, & THEODORE ROOSEVELT #12124 CLINTON & G.W. BUSH #12125 FILLMORE, PIERCE, & BUCHANAN #12126 FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT #12127 GARFIELD, ARTHUR, CLEVELAND, & B. HARRISON #12128 GEORGE WASHINGTON #12129 J.Q. ADAMS, JACKSON, & VAN BUREN #12130 JOHN ADAMS & THOMAS JEFFERSON #12131 L.B. JOHNSON, NIXON, & FORD #12132 MADISON & MONROE #12133 TAFT, WILSON, HARDING, COOLIDGE, & HOOVER #12134 THE MAKING OF AMERICA'S PRESIDENCY #12135 TRUMAN, EISENHOWER, & KENNEDY Funding for the Captioned Media Program is provided by the U.S. Department of Education New Dimension Media TEACHER’S GUIDE Grades 5 to 12 W.H. Harrison, Tyler, Polk & Taylor Our Presidents in America’s History Series Subject Area: Social Studies, U.S. History Synopsis: Chronicles the presidencies of William H. Harrison, John Tyler, James K. Polk, and Zachary Taylor. Focuses on westward expansion and the growing tensions between Northern and Southern states over slavery. Discusses the dishonest campaign that won Harrison the presidency; the controversial actions of Tyler; the expansion of American borders during the Polk presidency, and the controversy over extending slavery to new territories in Taylor’s term.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor's Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil Leaders
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2010 Article 14 Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor's Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil Leaders Kevin Dougherty Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Dougherty, Kevin (2010) "Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor's Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil Leaders," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 12 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol12/iss3/14 Dougherty: Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor's Mexican War Campaign a Review Dougherty, Kevin Summer 2010 Lewis, Felice Flanery Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor’s Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil Leaders. University of Alabama Press, $35.00 ISBN 978-0-8173-1678-5 Looking at the Pre-Civil War Proving Ground Readers have benefited from several recent treatments of the Mexican War, including A Gallant Little Army (2007), Timothy Johnson’s well-received chronicle of Winfield Scott’s Mexico City Campaign. However, if the Mexican War has been largely overshadowed by other wars, Felice Flanery Lewis complains, “Modern historians, in emphasizing [Winfield] Scott’s brilliance, have also tended to dismiss the significance of Taylor’s campaign" (228). She sets out to correct this negligence in Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor’s Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil Leaders. Lewis’s book is thorough and detailed. It quickly reminds the reader of the growing dispute between the United States and Mexico and then traces Taylor’s campaign from the formation of his Army of Observation through the key battles of Palo Alto, Resaca, Monterrey, and Buena Vista.
    [Show full text]
  • Important People: James K. Polk
    Important People: James K. Polk James K. Polk (1795-1849) was the eleventh president of the United States. His name is perhaps most Closely assoCiated with Manifest Destiny, as the term was Coined by a fellow DemoCrat in 1843, the year before he began his presidency. Manifest Destiny—the belief that AmeriCans were destined by God to Conquer the Continent to the PaCifiC OCean—soon Came to represent the governing philosophy of the Polk administration and its expansionist aims. Polk suCCessfully Campaigned for president on an expansionist platform. He promised to both annex the independent RepubliC of Texas and acquire the Oregon Territory, a Northwestern territory Claimed by the British. Two days after he took office, however, diplomatiC relations between MexiCo and the United States were severed over the AmeriCan annexation of Texas. Tensions continued to escalate as Polk settled the Oregon boundary with Britain at 49ºN, far south of the initial demanded border 54º40'. Polk, believing the territorial Claims of Oregon and Texas were insufficient in reaChing AmeriCa’s goal of Manifest Destiny, then set his sites on the MexiCan Controlled state of California. Polk sent an envoy to offer MexiCo up to $20 million for California, whiCh was immediately rejeCted by the MexiCan government. Meanwhile, border disputes between MexiCo and Texas continued. To pressure MexiCo into surrendering the lands, Polk sent General Zachary Taylor and AmeriCan forCes to the disputed territory along the Rio Grande. To MexiCan troops, this deployment of AmeriCan soldiers was an act of aggression. A Confrontation in 1846 ended when MexiCan troops launChed an attaCk on AmeriCan soldiers in the disputed region of Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • James K. Polk: Territorial Expansionist and the Evolution Of
    JAMES K. POLK: TERRITORIAL EXPANSIONIST AND THE EVOLUTION OF PRESIDENTIAL POWER Chris Blubaugh A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2013 Committee: Dr. Scott C. Martin, Advisor Dr. Edmund J. Danziger © 2013 Chris Blubaugh All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Scott C. Martin, Advisor This thesis argues that through President James K. Polk’s leadership style (micro-managing domestic/foreign issues), his understanding of bureaucracy, and dominating his Cabinet, enabled Polk to achieve what his predecessors could not. Furthermore, Polk’s leadership and administrative style foreshadowed, and perhaps provided a precedent for the modern American presidency. To demonstrate Polk’s leadership style, two areas must be examined. First, explain Polk’s keys to success while in office, in particular his leadership style in relation to his policies. President Polk’s direct involvement in domestic and foreign issues enabled him to achieve his four administrative goals: tariff reduction, creation of an Independent Treasury, settlement of the Oregon Territory between the U.S. and England, and acquiring California. For example, he pushed economic legislation in Congress (Independent Treasury), and micro-managed the Mexican War to accomplish territorial objectives. Secondly, examine the departure that President Polk made from previous administrations in regards to administrative skill. Compared to preceding administrations, President Polk was an excellent leader who firmly managed his Cabinet. He consulted his Cabinet on policy questions, but the final decision was his to make. Furthermore, he knew precisely what he wanted to accomplish as president, and he understood the political channels he needed to consult to achieve his goals.
    [Show full text]
  • John Tyler Ghosts and the Vice Presidency
    John Tyler Ghosts and the vice presidency EPISODE TRANSCRIPT Listen to Presidential at http://wapo.st/presidential This transcript was run through an automated transcription service and then lightly edited for clarity. There may be typos or small discrepancies from the podcast audio. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: Thank you so much. It's so nice to meet you. HARRISON TYLER: All right. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: This is Harrison Tyler, the grandson of our 10th president, John Tyler. Harrison Tyler is also the great-grandson on his mother's side of our ninth president, William Henry Harrison. Harrison Tyler is 88-years old, and I went to visit him near Richmond, Virginia. Unfortunately, he suffered a horrible stroke two years ago that erased his memory, so he couldn't share recollections of his family history. But he has been reminded since, both by those he knows and those he doesn't know, that he has a special connection to American presidential history. He let me sit with him as he signed letter after letter from people who've written asking for his signature. And he told me about how, just days before, he went to visit the grave of his grandfather. He couldn't remember all the times he had visited in the past. So, he wanted to go back to build a new memory -- and to understand how his own story is intertwined with the story of U.S. history. I'm Lillian Cunningham with The Washington Post, and this is the 10th episode of 'Presidential.' PRESIDENTIAL THEME MUSIC LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: John Tyler is the vice president who became president himself when William Henry Harrison died in office after only 32 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Media and Military Relations During the Mexican War
    MEDIA AND MILITARY RELATIONS DURING THE MEXICAN WAR A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by MAJ MATTHEW N. METZEL, MAJ, U.S. ARMY M.A., University of Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, 2004 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2010-01 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 11-06-2010 Master’s Thesis AUG 2009 – JUN 2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Media and Military Relations During the Mexican War 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6.
    [Show full text]
  • General Mariano Arista (1802-1855) General Zachary
    GENERAL MARIANO ARISTA (1802-1855) A loyal leader of Mexico’s Northern Army, General Mariano Arista refused to support General Paredes’ government takeover. After becoming President, Paredes replaced Arista and chose Pedro Ampudia to be the new General of the Northern Army. Northern citizens didn’t trust Ampudia and demanded Arista’s return. Paredes soon returned Arista to power. The next day, the determined general sent troops across the border, resulting in a Mexican victory in a skirmish at Rancho de Carricitos. Success was short-lived. As Mexican forces lost at Resaca de la Palma and abandoned Matamoros, Ampudia was restored to power. Arista refused to give up and demanded a military tribunal review his strategies. They did and declared “Perdío peleando” (he went down fighting). Arista’s ambition led him be Secretary of War and, in 1851, to become President of the Mexican Republic. ◊ Skirmish: A minor fight between small bodies of troops ◊ Tribunal: Court of justice ◊ Strategy: Plan of attack ◊ Ambition: An eager desire for social standing, fame, power, or to achieve a particular goal GENERAL ZACHARY TAYLOR (1784-1850) The modest General Zachary Taylor preferred to wear a plain uniform and straw hat than a General’s polished uniform. Having been in the army for over 40 years, Taylor understood the hardships of a soldier’s life. Unlike other generals, he fought alongside his men, earning their trust and respect. He was known as “Old Rough and Ready,” a nickname that reflected his modesty and ability to make quick decisions in battle. His success in the Battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma made the General a national hero.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREATEST CAPTAIN of HIS AGE: REMEMBERING GENERAL WINFIELD SCOTT by Allan Peskin
    June 2012 June 2013 THE GREATEST CAPTAIN OF HIS AGE: REMEMBERING GENERAL WINFIELD SCOTT By Allan Peskin Allan Peskin is Professor Emeritus of History at Cleveland State University. His books include Garfield (Kent State University Press, 1978) and Winfield Scott and the Profession of Arms (Kent State University Press, 2003). This essay is based on a lecture for FPRI’s Butcher History Institute conference on “Great Captains in American History,” the eighth weekend-long program for high school teachers on American military history hosted and cosponsored by the First Division Museum at Cantigny in Wheaton, Illinois (a division of the McCormick Foundation) on April 20-21, 2013. The conference was supported by grants from the Butcher Family Foundation, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, and the Stuart Family Foundation. Of all the Great Captains we are examining in this conference, Winfield Scott is probably the least known to the general public. Years ago, when I told people I was writing a biography of President Garfield, a common reaction was “Why?” Later, when I was writing a biography of Winfield Scott, they asked: “Who?” That was a sad comedown for the reputation of a man who, during his lifetime, was often referred to as “The Greatest Captain of His Age,” and of whom the Duke of Wellington reportedly said: “Scott is the greatest living soldier.” From this, two questions arise: Did Scott deserve the towering reputation he enjoyed during his lifetime? and Why did that reputation fade in later years among the general public. First, as to his rise. By present-day standards Scott's dazzling military career seems highly improbable.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Fun Facts
    Get to Know Our Presidents Presidential Fun Facts George Washington Washington didn’t have teeth, and he had to wear dentures! He was obsessed with keeping teeth cleaned and even made sure his horses had their teeth brushed every day! John Adams Adams was the first president to live in the White House. He was one of only two presidents who signed the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson Jefferson had a pet grizzly bear cub at the White House! He was a speleologist—a cave explorer! James Madison Madison was the shortest of all of our presidents. He was only 5’4”! Madison and his wife used to serve all their guests ice cream. James Monroe Monroe was shot in the shoulder during the Revolutionary War, but they never took the bullet out! The White House was painted white during his presidency. It was just the color of wood before that. John Quincy Adams Adams was the first president to have his photograph taken. He used to go for a swim in the Potomac River every morning at 5 a.m.! Andrew Jackson Had a pet parrot named Poll who could whistle and talk. She didn’t always speak politely though… Jackson was involved in several duels. One of the bullets from a duel was lodged in his chest the rest of his life! Martin Van Buren Van Buren used to be called “Old Kinderhook” after the town he was from. It was shortened to “O.K.” and this led to the word okay! He was the first president to be born after the United States was a country.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of WINFIELD, ILLINOIS While Along an Early Stagecoach Line and the First Railroad out of Chicago, Winfield Remained
    THE HISTORY OF WINFIELD, ILLINOIS While along an early stagecoach line and the first railroad out of Chicago, Winfield remained in the shadow of its neighboring towns, West Chicago, Wheaton, and Naperville. Until the 1920s, Winfield primarily was a center for German-speaking farmers. Suburban growth came with the toll roads after 1960. Before the village of Winfield was officially established, the area was associated with Gary's Mill, a lumbering settlement established in the 1830s by Erastus, Jude, and Charles Gary, two miles northeast of Warren's Station. Although a James P. Doe of New Hampshire received a land grant in the area in 1845, he did not have it platted as the Town of Fredericksburg until 1853. The following year, however, it appeared on railroad maps as Winfield. The namesake for Winfield is General Winfield Scott, who was also honored by Winfield Township, which in part incorporates the Village. Winfield Scott (June 13, 1786 – May 29, 1866) was a United States Army general and unsuccessful presidential candidate of the Whig party in 1852. Known as "Old Fuss and Feathers" and the "Grand Old Man of the Army", he served on active duty as a general longer than any other man in American history and many historians rate him the ablest American commander of his time. Over the course of his fifty- year career, he commanded forces in the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Black Hawk War, the Second Seminole War, and, briefly, the American Civil War, conceiving the Union strategy known as the Anaconda Plan that would be used to defeat the Confederacy.
    [Show full text]