Building Healthy Cities: the Experience and Challenges Faced by China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Building Healthy Cities: the Experience and Challenges Faced by China CITIES, HEALTH AND WELL-BEING HONG KONG, NOVEMBER 2011 a worldwide investigation into the future of cities Building healthy cities: the experience and challenges faced by China Bingqin Li is Lecturer in Social Policy and Research Associate at the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Cities are crucial for China’s economic development. level to the top to become a national level winner, as Further urbanisation is one of the key elements of do districts and rural townships participating in the post-central planning reform and is seen as the solu- ‘hygienic district/township’ campaigns. tion to rural poverty. However, as people concentrate The key motivation for participating is that offi- in cities, they face various health challenges. These cials in winning cities have a good chance of being concern not only the provision of good health care promoted. Outstanding individual performers may services but also the prevention of disease, improving be honoured and even rewarded financially. Partici- the quality of living environments and maintaining a pating cities also receive special grants from higher healthy lifestyle. government authorities. It is, therefore, not difficult Due to its long history of public health campaigns, for organisers to attract willing participants. By the there is a strong belief in China in the positive im- end of 2009, 118 National Hygienic Cities, 28 Nation- pact of city hygiene on public health. Public health al Hygienic Urban Neighbourhoods and 377 Nation- campaigns (PHCs) originated in the 1950s during the al Hygienic Counties and Towns had been awarded. Korean War as a means to fight the threat of chemi- The HCC helps to transform a city in many ways. cal and biological warfare, and were later institution- It motivates a greater investment in basic services alised as a civilian affair and continued regularly un- and public infrastructure than local governments til 1966, playing an important role in disease control would otherwise be likely to make and increases and health education. They were suspended during public awareness of hygiene issues. In order to win, the Cultural Revolution, but resumed in 1978 before city authorities need to choreograph wide-ranging being transformed into award schemes that encour- support from lower level officials, public and private aged cities to reach certain public hygiene standards enterprises and the general public. As a result, a large in 1989, under the so-called Hygienic City Campaign part of the campaign is about educating the public (HCC). and getting them involved. If run well, a campaign’s Cities wishing to become a National Hygienic City knock-on effect can be stimulating the public to de- have to go through a series of campaigns in order to mand better services from the local government in climb up the ladder, step by step. The campaigns fo- the future. The competitive nature of the campaigns cus on health education, city appearance, environ- helps to keep local officials accountable and dramati- mental sanitation, public hygiene, the cleanliness of cally increases their responsiveness while the cam- drinking water, food hygiene and infectious disease paign is in progress. control, among others. Taken together, there are Sustaining the benefits can, however, be a major more than 60 indicators to measure and hundreds challenge and the structure of the competition helps of targets to meet. Although central government sets in this regard. First, it takes many years to become a the indicators and targets, local governments do not national level winner: it took Guanghzou 18 years to have to follow a prescribed campaign model. Some finally be awarded the title, Xining 10 years, Nanjing cities in the less developed western provinces face less 14 years and Yichang 12 years. Second, some of the pressure from industrialisation and migration and indicators in the competition concern institutional or end up spending more on upgrading public toilets, governmental changes that are hard to reverse. Third, setting up modern sewers and improving the provi- the National Committee checks a sample of the past sion of drinking water, than on improving air quality. winners every three years and cities failing to meet Cities have to go through several stages from the local the standards are given a warning or stripped of their 1 title. Finally, new competitions have also been set up, porarily turned many unhygienic restaurants into such as the Civilised City Campaign, providing new bookshops or tourist agencies in order to avoid in- city-wide challenges to winners of the hygienic city spection. In another example, some small restaurants competitions. in Xining did not open their toilets to customers so In spite of these benefits, and the mechanisms put that they would remain spotlessly clean, while oth- in place to sustain efforts, the HCC is controversial. A ers stopped offering tissues to customers in order to single-minded focus on winning awards can disrupt prevent littering. regular services and have negative impacts upon lo- Given the drawbacks of the HCC, should it be cal businesses. In some cities, such as Kunming and stopped altogether? There are several reasons why Guangzhou, for example, government officials were a hygiene campaign of some sort should continue required to commit to deliver certain results. Fail- to exist. First, the HCC does lead to increased pub- ing to deliver meant they would lose their jobs. This lic awareness, which may make the possibility of method enhanced the responsiveness of officials but the public demanding a better environment and it also meant that they became ruthless in the face improved hygiene in the future more likely. During of obstacles. In Kunming, for example, officials de- campaigns, people use Internet forums to expose the manded that all small businesses remove anti-theft fraudulent practices of the local governments, as well protection to make the markets look nicer but no as to show their appreciation of improved cleanliness compensating efforts were made to improve safety. and new facilities. They were also more outspoken The ensuing tension between the public and policy and dissatisfied when standards dropped again after enforcers culminated in a riot in 2009. In a bid to re- the campaigns. Second, concerns about sustainabil- duce litter and waste accumulating in public spaces, ity may be of second order in comparison to taking businesses in Xining and Lanzhou were required to action in the first place. Indicators and management decrease opening hours to align with the guidelines style can then be improved in order to avoid creat- set by policy enforcers. ing perverse incentives. However, whether people can In addition to receiving grants from higher gov- rely on government officials to make such improve- ernment authorities, cities also try to raise funds ments themselves is questionable. from district governments. Sometimes, businesses, It is, however, important to point out that cleanli- public sector organisations and individuals have ness is only relevant to some of the health problems been coerced to contribute, through direct financial faced by China’s urban residents. In 2009, a health contribution as well as through providing materials survey was carried out in 589 cities with nearly one and committing their own time. In order to increase million interviewees. The average age of people suf- accessibility to public toilets and drinking water, for fering from high blood pressure, high cholesterol and example, state enterprises in Xining were required to high blood sugar was found to have dropped from open their facilities to the public and school terms over 50 to just 30 to 40 years. Such results are not were cut short in order to secure student volunteers just a problem of unaffordable health care, but also for the effort. reflect dramatic changes in lifestyle. Unhealthy eat- As a secondary source of revenue increase, some ing habits, long and stressful work, irregular sleeping local governments focused on urban regeneration to patterns, over-indulgence in Internet surfing and fre- improve the city’s appearance. Xining and Kunming quent business banquets, are all possible contributors wanted to attract more tourists and cities in the Jiang- to urban health problems. The survey shows that the su province wanted to attract more investment. These richer a city becomes, the poorer the health profile of efforts create situations where cities might plant grass the population gets, with Beijing, Shanghai, Guang- to quickly increase their green areas, without think- zhou and Shenzhen faring worse than less prosperous ing about the impact on increased water consump- cities. tion. Influenced by the World Health Organization’s Above all, the top-down approach of the HCC (WHO) ideas about healthy cities, some second-tier tends to invite cheating. Some local governments re- Chinese cities, such as Suzhou and Hangzhou, have sort to fraudulent measures in order to make a good made an early start in exploring a broader conception impression on inspectors. During their inspection of healthy and liveable cities. In 2007, the Ministry of period the city of Jiaozuo in Henan Province tem- Health set up a task force dedicated to promoting a 2 healthy lifestyle throughout China and a number of cities and urban districts were selected as pilots for ‘Healthy City’ schemes. As the country becomes increasingly urbanised, health challenges increase. Rapid growth of urban population and unaffordable housing, in particular in megacities, generates poor and overcrowded hous- ing conditions in suburban slums and urban villages. These neighbourhoods do not always receive equal basic services and suffer from poor infrastructure. According to the WHO, the proportion of China’s urban population using shared sanitation has grown from 25 to 30 per cent between 1990 and 2008, while the proportion defecating in the open has risen from 3 to 6 per cent.
Recommended publications
  • Urbanisation and Disease Patterns in Shanghai
    CITIES, HEALTH AND WELL-BEING HONG KONG, NOVEMBER 2011 a worldwide investigation into the future of cities Urbanisation and disease patterns in Shanghai Youde Guo is Associate Professor in the School of Social Development and Public Policy at Fudan University, Shanghai. Shanghai is in many aspects at the leading edge of During the past decade, Shanghai underwent China’s urbanisation, modernisation and economic a dramatic change in its city form and other urban development, factors which have serious consequenc- characteristics. With more than 20 million people es for the quality of life and well-being of the city’s 23 packed into fixed municipal boundaries, the popu- million people. With almost 90 per cent of its popu- lation density of Shanghai reached 3,030 people per lation living in officially defined urban areas within square kilometre in 2009, up by 19.5 per cent from its municipal boundaries, Shanghai has the highest 2000. This indicator rises to 16,000–44,000 people level of urbanisation among all large cities in China. per square kilometre in central Shanghai, making With a total fertility rate of only 0.89 in 2010, much the city one of the most crowded megacities in the lower than the widely accepted replacement level of world. While this level of human density used to be 2.1, Shanghai has the lowest level of fertility among associated with dense industrial activities, especially all large Chinese cities and one of the lowest among in the central city, Shanghai has gradually moved world cities. In addition, Shanghai’s proportion of away from manufacturing and has been enlarging its older inhabitants (aged 60 and over) made up 22.5 per service sector.
    [Show full text]
  • City Villages: More Homes, Better Communities, IPPR
    CITY VILLAGES MORE HOMES, BETTER COMMUNITIES March 2015 © IPPR 2015 Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This book was first published in March 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions expressed in this collection are those of the authors only. CITY VILLAGES More homes, better communities Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies March 2015 ABOUT THE EDITORS Andrew Adonis is chair of trustees of IPPR and a former Labour cabinet minister. Bill Davies is a research fellow at IPPR North. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editors would like to thank Peabody for generously supporting the project, with particular thanks to Stephen Howlett, who is also a contributor. The editors would also like to thank the Oak Foundation for their generous and long-standing support for IPPR’s programme of housing work.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE Connect Winter 2012
    Connect For alumni of the London School of Economics and Political Science Vol 24, number 2, winter 2012 A rising tide Judith Rees on water research Virtually real Vili Lehdonvirta on real money in a virtual world Director invites alumni to shape LSE’s future LSE residences offer good quality, centrally located, bed and breakfast accommodation to all during the winter vacation! Carr-Saunders Hall Passfield Hall Rosebery Hall W1 WC1 EC1 By choosing to book with LSE Vacations you are helping to provide safe, secure and affordable housing for our students. The additional revenue from vacation trading contributes to keeping student rents as low as possible. This environment supports and enhances the learning goals of our diverse community, in particular our efforts to widen participation. LSE is committed to recruiting the best possible students with the highest academic and intellectual potential, regardless of their economic or social background. Also available: LSE TopFloor! a range of high quality rooms, studios and apartments available year round. for alumni, staff and current students (Staff, student or alumni ID required) VOLUME 24 NUMBER 2 CONTENTS Editor’s message Earlier this month Professor Craig Calhoun, the new Director of LSE, ran a question and answer session on Twitter. It was fun. Professor Calhoun tweets regularly anyway (you can follow him on @craigjcalhoun) but the idea behind this one-hour intense session was to allow students, staff and alumni – and indeed 16 24 the general public – to ask anything they wished and to get instantaneous answers back. In all, 137 questions were asked, with nearly two-thirds from students but a fair number from Features Regulars alumni.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards New Urban Mobility: the Case of London and Berlin
    Towards New Urban Mobility New Towards The case of London and Berlin case of London The Towards New Urban Mobility The case of London and Berlin LSE Cities and InnoZ, 2015 3 3 Research Directors Philipp Rode Executive Director of LSE Cities and Senior Research Fellow, London School of Economics and Political Science London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Christian Hoffmann, Director of User Research, London Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change WC2A 2AE (InnoZ) UK Research Team Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 7706 [email protected] Jens Kandt www.lsecities.net Lead Researcher, LSE Cities Duncan Smith Research Officer, LSE Cities Andreas Graff Researcher, InnoZ Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change (InnoZ) GmbH Support and Advice Torgauer Strasse 12 - 15 Alexandra Gomes, LSE Cities 10829 Berlin Alun Humphrey, National Centre for Social Research Germany Ben Plowden, Transport for London Catarina Heeckt, LSE Cities Tel: +49 (0)30 238884-0 Colin Shepherd, Transport for London [email protected] Florian Lennert, InnoZ www.innoz.de Jillian Anable, University of Aberdeen Joe Stordy, Transport for London Supported by Imke Steinmeyer, Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment Nihan Akyelken, University of Oxford Piotr Fryzlewicz, London School of Economics and Political Science Robert Vollmer, infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences Robin Hickman, University College London Samantha Kennedy, Transport for London Thorsten Brand, infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences Production and Graphic Design Peter Griffiths Managing Editor, LSE Cities Atelier Works www.atelierworks.co.uk This Report is intended as a basis for discussion. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material in this report, the authors and/or LSE Cities will not be liable for any loss or damage incurred through the use of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Age India Conference November 2007
    URBAN AGE INDIA CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 2007 Ricky Burdett London School of Economics and Political Science The Urban Age and India All rights are reserved by the presenter. www.urban-age.net THE URBAN AGE AND INDIA Urban Age India Conference Mumbai, 2-3 November 2007 Ricky Burdett, London School of Economics and Political Science UBAN AGE INDIA CONFERENCE • Revised GREEN programme replaces PINK • Newspaper and research data (TISS) • 2 days; 6 sessions • Over 50 active participants – architects, academics, planners, business and city leaders • Reflections by Urban Age experts • Speakers and respondents • Rigorous time keeping by 2 co-chairs (warnings!) • Written questions from the floor CONFERENCE THEMES Day 1 • Cities in their global context 9.20-10.45 • Envisioning the future 11.00-13.00 • Urban Inequality-Housing the urban poor 14.20- 17.30 Day 2 • Climate Change 9.30-10.45 • Planning cities 11.00-13.00 • Running Cities - City Leaders Forum 14.40-16.40 • Conclusion 17.00 SELECTION URBAN AGE 2007-2010 • International and interdiscplinary debate on the future of the city • Conference, seminars and research • India – Mumbai 2007, South America – Sao Paulo 2008, Eastern Mediterranean – Istanbul 2009, Summit 2010 • Research on social, economic and spatial trends • City leaders, national and regional government, urban experts on design, transport, planning and governance • Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award • Urban Age website and e-bulletins • The Endless City – 512 page book POPULATION CHANGE OF SELECTED CITIES, 1950 TO 2020 LIVING IN THE CITY NEW
    [Show full text]
  • UNLOCKING the INCLUSIVE GROWTH STORY of the 21ST CENTURY: ACCELERATING CLIMATE ACTION in URGENT TIMES Managing Partner
    UNLOCKING THE INCLUSIVE GROWTH STORY OF THE 21ST CENTURY: ACCELERATING CLIMATE ACTION IN URGENT TIMES Managing Partner Partners Evidence. Ideas. Change. New Climate Economy www.newclimateeconomy.report c/o World Resources Institute www.newclimateeconomy.net 10 G St NE Suite 800 Washington, DC 20002, USA +1 (202) 729-7600 August 2018 Cover photo credit: REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhuri Current page photo credit: Flickr/Neil Palmer/CIAT Photo credit: Chuttersnap/Unsplash The New Climate Economy The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, and its flagship project the New Climate Economy, were set up to help governments, businesses and society make better-informed decisions on how to achieve economic prosperity and development while also addressing climate change. It was commissioned in 2013 by the governments of Colombia, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The Global Commission, comprising, 28 former heads of government and finance ministers, and leaders in the fields of economics, business and finance, operates as an independent body and, while benefiting from the support of the partner governments, has been given full freedom to reach its own conclusions. The Commission has published three major flagship reports: Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report, in September 2014; Seizing the Global Opportunity: Partnerships for Better Growth and a Better Climate, in July 2015; and The Sustainable Infrastructure Imperative: Financing Better Growth and Development, in October 2016. The project has also released a number of country reports on Brazil, China, Ethiopia, India, Uganda, and the United States, as well as various working papers on cities, land use, energy, industry, and finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Msc in Cities
    Executive MSc in Cities 2020 ADMISSION ST PANCRAS STATION, LONDON Photo credit: C.Heeckt LSE Cities LSE Cities and its Executive MSc in Cities are making an important contribution to advancing city leadership globally. Parks Tau, President, United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) LSE Cities is an international centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science that carries out research, graduate and executive education, outreach and advisory activities in London and abroad. Extending LSE’s century-old commitment to the understanding of urban society, LSE Cities investigates how complex urban systems are responding to the pressures of growth, change and globalisation with new infrastructures of design and governance that both complement and threaten social and environmental equity. LSE Cities was awarded the Queen’s Anniversary Prize for Higher and Further Education for 2016-2018 in recognition of its work on training, research and policy formulation for cities of the future and a new generation of urban leaders around the world. LSE Cities hosts a young and interdisciplinary group of The innovative Executive MSc in Cities, now in its fifth year, is researchers who investigate how cities can be designed and designed around the popular ‘learning while working’ model managed to be more open, promote social inclusion, reduce for early to mid-career professionals. With five weeks of intense the impacts of climate change and be governed more effectively. teaching sessions in London spread over twelve months, the Building on its authoritative database of over 60 global cities, programme provides direct contact with LSE faculty and global the centre works with local governments, international agencies fellows, and a further six months of personalised consulting other institutions on innovative applied research that shapes with a host organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Events Open to the Lse Community And
    EVENTS OPEN TO THE LSE COMMUNITY AND THE PUBLIC to 6 September December 2019 20 Finance Most finance professionals can drive the car... But do they understand how the engine works? At LSE, we believe in understanding why things work. We take you below the surface to understand the fundamentals of finance, giving you the tools to accelerate your career in a changing marketplace. MSc Finance (Part-time) The MSc Finance (Part-time) is LSE’s most established Executive Master’s programme. Taught in the evenings, it provides a unique opportunity for busy professionals to combine a full-time career with the opportunity to study a world- class MSc Finance programme that is grounded in academic depth and rigour. Join us for an Information Evening or a one-to-one session to discuss your application. Register at lse.ac.uk/finance 19_0577 FinanceAdvert_Events.indd 1 07/08/2019 15:29 Finance WELCOME Everyone is welcome to attend LSE’s public events, where some of the Most finance professionals can drive the car... most influential figures in the social sciences can be heard. Events are generally free and open to all, with entry on a first come, first But do they understand served basis – unless otherwise stated. It does get busy so we advise people to turn up 20 minutes before the advertised time. For ticketed events, please go to lse.ac.uk/events and fill in the online booking form to request how the engine works? a ticket. Allocations of tickets are set aside for LSE staff and students. Transcripts, podcasts and videos of an increasing number of LSE events are available online after the event at lse.ac.uk/lse-player.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Accounts
    Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 July 2006 Contents Page Report of the Chairman of the Court of Governors 1-2 Report of the Director 3-6 Report of the Directors 7 Accounting Policies 8-9 Consolidated Income and Expenditure Account 10 Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses 11 Balance Sheets 12 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 13 Notes to the Accounts 14-27 Corporate Governance and Internal Control Statement 28-29 Environmental Policy Statement 30 Endowment Investment Performance 31 Statement of Council’s Responsibilities 32 Report of the Auditors 33 Officers Responsible for the School’s Finances 34 Directors of the School and Members of the Council 35 Report of the Chairman of the Court of Governors Pedestrianisation of Houghton Street During the past year, the School has continued to enhance • the Memorandum and Articles of Association, the School’s the effectiveness of its governance arrangements. Our Instrument of Governance, has been revised so that responsibility for procedures and practices meet, and in many respects surpass, formal approval of the annual audited accounts of the company and nationally commended standards of good practice. the appointment of the Director of the School lie with the Council, bringing us into line with normal company practice. I mentioned in my report last year that we were assessing the School’s governance against the recommendations of the The role and responsibilities of the Heads of Academic Departments Committee of University Chairmens’ (CUC) Governance Code have been clarified following the recommendations of a Review of Practice and General Principles and reviewing the structure Group chaired by the Director.
    [Show full text]
  • Residents' Experience of High-Density Housing in London, 2018
    Residents’ experience of high-density housing in London LSE London/LSE Cities report for the GLA Final report June 2018 By Kath Scanlon, Tim White and Fanny Blanc Table of contents 1. Rationale for the research and context ............................................................................... 2 2. Research questions and methodology ................................................................................ 4 2.1. Phases 1 and 2 ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2. Research questions ...................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Case study selection .................................................................................................... 4 2.4. Fieldwork .................................................................................................................... 6 2.5. Analysis and drafting .................................................................................................. 8 3. Existing knowledge ............................................................................................................ 9 3.1. Recent LSE research ................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Other recent research into density in London ........................................................... 10 3.3. What is good density? ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2017-2018 Issue
    We are delighted to turn more applications from under- represented students into offers. Minouche Shafik, new Director of LSE, on the School’s successes in Widening Participation p4 Issue 17, Winter 2017/18 Celebrating volunteering and philanthropy at LSE FOCUS ON HIGHLIGHTS: Arena: combating WIDENING disinformation in the Expanding horizons: information age p14 PARTICIPATION: Annual Fund Study LSE leads the way in Abroad travel LSE Supporter Roll social mobility p4 bursaries p10 2016/17 p23 LSE and Sutton Trust Sustainable economic partner in providing growth through evidence- Pathways p6 based research: the IGC in India p12 1 Contents REALISING POTENTIAL: FOCUS ON WIDENING PARTICIPATION LSE leads the way in social mobility p4 Alison Wetherfield Foundation supports lawyers of the future p5 LSE and Sutton Trust partner in providing Pathways p6 Hammering out a new world – the Fabian Window at LSE p7 Scholarship news p7 VOLUNTEERING Alumni news p8 My LSE story: Manuel Geggus, vice-president of the German Friends of LSE p9 ANNUAL FUND Expanding horizons: Annual Fund Study Abroad travel bursaries p10 Annual Fund breaks £1 million barrier again p11 Cover story: LSE leads the way in social mobility p4 RESEARCH INNOVATION Sustainable economic growth through evidence-based research and policy p12 IGC in India p13 Arena: combating disinformation in the information age p14 THOUGHT LEADERSHIP My LSE story: Manuel Geggus (second from right), Kuwait Programme celebrates vice-president of the 10th anniversary with five-year German Friends of LSE p9
    [Show full text]
  • Urba Gove an Ag Erning E Con G Urba Nferen
    a worldwide iinvestigation into the future of cities organiseed by LSE Cities at the London School of Ecoonomics and Political Science and the Alfred Heerrhausen Society, the Internationall Forum of Deutsche Bank URBAN AGE CONFERENCE GOVERNING URBAN FUTURES DELHI, INDIA 14-15 NOVEMBER 2014 Final conference programme In partnership with Friday, 14 November 2014 Location: Hyatt Regency, Delhi 08.45 to 09.15 WELCOME Anshu Jain, Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Alfred Herrhausen Society and Co-CEO of Deutsche Bank Craig Calhoun, President and Director, London School of Economics and Political Science 09.15 to 09.45 INAUGURAL ADDRESS Greg Clark, Minister for Universities, Science and Cities, UK Government 09.45 to 10.00 OVERVIEW Urban Age Conference: Governing Urban Futures Ricky Burdett, Director, LSE Cities and Urban Age, LSE 10.00 to 10.45 SHAPING URBAN FUTURES Chair: Ricky Burdett, Director, LSE Cities and Urban Age, LSE PRESENTATIONS (15min each) Towards a global agenda for urban development Joan Clos, Executive Director, UN Habitat Ungovernable urban complexity Richard Sennett, Professor of Sociology, LSE and NYU City institutions for an urban age Ed Glaeser, Professor of Economics, Harvard University 10.45 to 11.15 COFFEE BREAK 11.15 to 11.30 KEYNOTE Governing Tehran Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, Mayor of Tehran 11.30 to 13.00 URBANISING GOVERNMENT: DEVOLVING THE STATE Co-Chairs: Jagan Shah, Director, National Institute of Urban Affairs and Andy Altman, Senior Visiting Fellow, LSE Cities PRESENTATIONS (10min each) A voice for Urban India:
    [Show full text]