DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin U.S. Department of the Interior June 2019 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin Volume 3: Appendices B through M Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIS $2,100,000 The Bureau of Land Management’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by con- serving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. Appendix B Acronyms and Abbreviations, Literature Cited, and Glossary This page intentionally left blank. Appendix B. Acronyms and Abbreviations, Literature Cited, and Glossary B.1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Full Phrase ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AIM Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring AML appropriate management level BCR bird conservation region BLM Bureau of Land Management BSU biologically significant unit CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations DDT dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane DNA determination of NEPA adequacy DOI Department of Interior EA environmental assessment EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FIAT Fire and Invasives Assessment Tool FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act GHMA general habitat management area HMA herd management area IBA important bird area IHMA important habitat management area IM Instruction Memorandum ITA Indian Trust Asset MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MOU memorandum of understanding MtCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NIFC National Interagency Fire Center NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWCG National Wildfire Coordination Group June 2019 Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin B-1 B. Acronyms and Abbreviations, Literature Cited, and Glossary OHMA other habitat management area OHV off-highway vehicle PAC priority area for conservation PEIS programmatic environmental impact statement PHMA priority habitat management area PILT payment in lieu of taxes PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter, 10 and 2.5 microns or smaller PFYC Potential Fossil Yield Classification RMP resource management plan RMPA resource management plan amendment ROS Recreation Opportunity Spectrum ROW right-of-way RSC Recreation Setting Characteristics SHPO State Historic Preservation Office SRP special recreation permit TCP Traditional Cultural Property USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WEG wind erodibility group WFM wildland fire management WUI wildland-urban interface B.2 LITERATURE CITED Agee, J., B. Bahro, M. Finney, P. Omi, D. Sapsis, C. Skinner, J. van Wagtendonk, P. Weatherspoon. 2000. “The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management.” Forest Ecology and Management 127(2000):55-66. https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/skinner/psw_2000_skinner(agee)001.pdf Andrews, P. L., F. A. Heinsch, and L. Schelvan. 2011. How to Generate and Interpret Fire Characteristics Charts for Surface and Crown Fire Behavior. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-253. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado. Baker, W. L. 2011. “Pre-Euro-American and recent fire in sagebrush ecosystems.” Studies in Avian Biology 38:185–301. Bakker, J. D., P. W. Dunwiddie, S. A. Hall, J. R. Evans, G. M. Davies, and E. Dettweiler-Robinson. 2011. Vegetation Impacts of Recurring Fires on Sagebrush Ecosystems in Washington: Implications for Conservation and Rehabilitation. Final report to the Joint Fire Science Program for Project 08-1- 5-20. Internet website: https://www.firescience.gov/projects/08-1-5-20/project/08-1-5- 20_final_report.pdf. Balch, J. K., B. A. Bradley, C. M. D’Antonio, and J. Gómez-Dans. 2013. “Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980–2009).” Global Change Biology 19:173–183. ((ch4)) B-2 Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin June 2019 B. Acronyms and Abbreviations, Literature Cited, and Glossary Balda, R. P. 2002. Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus. In: Poole, A.; Gill, F. (ed.), The birds of North America, No. 605, pp. 1-32. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia and the American Ornithologists' Union, Philadelphia and Washington, DC. Barbour, M. G. and W. D. Billings. 2000. North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Google Books. Bawa, Ranjit. 2016. Effects of Wildfire on The Value of Recreation in Southern California’s National Forests. Report. Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f2a1/bb012f4c635d0720f4a01c10de278f89825f.pdf. Belnap, J., and J. S. Gardner. 1993. “Soil microstructure of the Colorado Plateau: The role of the cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus.” Great Basin Naturalist 53: 40–47. Belnap, J. 1994. Potential Role of Cryptobiotic Soil Crusts in Semiarid Rangelands. Symposium on Ecology, Management, and Restoration of Intermountain Annual Rangelands. May 18–22: 179– 185. Belnap, J., and D. A. Gillette. 1998.” Vulnerability of desert soil surfaces to wind erosion: Impacts of soil texture and disturbance.” Journal of Arid Environments 39: 133–142. Belsky, J. A., and D. M. Blumenthal. 1997. “Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior West.” Conservation Biology 11(2): 315–327. Internet website: https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr292/1997_belsky.pdf. Benton, N., J. Fleckenstein, A. Frances, and A. Treher. December 2016. Estimating the Effect of BLM Treatment Types on Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Species in Sagebrush Habitats. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Final Report for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. BLM (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management). 2003. Resource Notes. No. 63. Risk of Cheatgrass Invasion After Fire in Selected Sagebrush Community Types. Internet website: https://www.blm.gov/nstc/resourcenotes/respdf/RN63.pdf. _____. 2007. Final Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on Bureau of Land Management Lands in 17 Western States Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Reno, Nevada. _____. 2010. BLM Handbook H-4700-1 Wild Horse and Burros Management Handbook. Washington, DC. June 2010. _____. 2011. Paradigm Fuel Break Project. Internet website: https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/ eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=renderDefaultPlanOrProjectSite&projectId= 15052. _____. 2012a. Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2013. Washington, DC. _____. 2012b. National Recreation Programs. Updated as of October 22, 2012. Internet website: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/Recreation/recreation_national.html. June 2019 Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin B-3 B. Acronyms and Abbreviations, Literature Cited, and Glossary _____. 2014. Handbook H-8320-01–Planning for Recreation and Visitor Services. Rel. 8-85. Washington, DC. August 22, 2014. _____. 2015. Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendments for the Great Basin Region, Including the Greater Sage-Grouse Sub-Regions of Idaho and Southwestern Montana, Nevada and Northeastern California, Oregon, and Utah. Washington, DC. _____. 2016. Vegetation Treatments Using Aminopyralid Fluroxypyr and Rimsulfuron on BLM Lands in 17 Western States PEIS. Internet website: https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/ eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=renderDefaultPlanOrProjectSite&projectId=703 01&dctmId=0b0003e8807ca411. _____. 2017. Public Land Statistics FY 2016. Published May 2017. Internet website: https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/PublicLandStatistics2016.pdf. _____. 2018a. Incorporating Assessment, Inventory and Monitoring (AIM) for Monitoring Fuels Project Effectiveness. Washington, D.C. December 2018. _____. 2018b. Socioeconomic Baseline Report. Prepared for the Fuels Breaks and Fuels Reduction and Habitat Restoration PEISs. _____. 2018c. Public Land Statistics Report. March 1, 2018. _____. 2019a. Idaho Greater Sage-Grouse Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. Boise, Idaho. _____. 2019b. Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. Reno, Nevada. _____. 2019c. Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. Portland, Oregon. _____. 2019d. Record of Decision and Approved Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Resource Management Plan Amendment. Salt Lake City, Utah. BLM GIS. 2018. GIS data provided by the BLM to support alternatives, affected environment, and environmental consequences. BLM Idaho State Office. Boise, Idaho. Block, W. M., L. M. Conner, P. A. Brewer, P. Ford, J. Haufler, A. Litt, R. E. Masters, L. R. Mitchell and J. Park. 2016. Effects of Prescribed Fire on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat in Selected Ecosystems of North America. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 16-01. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 69 pp. Boyko, A. R., Gibson, R. M., and J. R. Lucas. 2004. "How Predation Risk Affects the Temporal Dynamics of Avian Leks: Greater Sage Grouse versus Golden Eagles.," The American Naturalist 163(1): 154-165. B-4 Programmatic EIS for Fuel Breaks in the Great Basin June 2019 B. Acronyms and Abbreviations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Centaurea Stoebe (Spotted Knapweed)
    Endophytic fungi as a biodiversity hotspot: the case of Centaurea stoebe (spotted knapweed) Alexey Shipunov Department of Forest Resources University of Idaho Spotted knapweed Spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L., also known as C. maculosa, C. micrantha, C. biebersteinii) is a noxious, invasive plant which was introduced into North America from Eurasia in 1890s. Plant fungal endophytes • Grow inside plant, but do not cause any symptoms • Cryptic symbionts, inhabiting all plants • Play lots of different roles, include host tolerance to stressful conditions, plant defense, plant growth, and plant community biodiversity • One example of the economic importance of endophytes is taxol, well-known anticancer drug, which is not a product of Taxus brevifolia (yew) tree, but of its endophyte Taxomyces andreana Anamorphs and teleomorphs More than 1/3 of fungi do not normally express any sexual characters. They are anamorphs. Sometimes, some anamorphic fungi develop into sexual teleomorphs which have “more morphology” and can be properly classified. Before molecular era, all anamorphic fungi have been treated as Alternaria (anamorph, above), “Deuteromycota”. and Lewia (teleomorph, below) Most of knapweed endophytes are are the same organism. anamorphic ascomycetes. BLAST search usually reveals mixed lists of ana- and teleomorph names Pleomorphic fungi (with variable anamorph/teleomorph relationships) are one of the most painful problem for fungal taxonomy. The weakness of morphology From Jeewon et al. (2003), and Hu et al. (2007) Pestalotiopsis example: morphology chosen as the only identification tool leads to highly tangled molecular tree. “Identify, then sequence” does not work for novel isolates. Thus, the identification of fungi depends on either high level of expertise, or on proper barcoding.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa State Journal of Research 61.2
    oufiiil of Research Volume 61, No. 2 ISSN0092-6345 November, 1986 ISJRA6 61(2) 153-296 1986 From the Editors . 153 ISELY, D. Leguminosae of the United States. Astragalus L.: IV. Species Summary N-Z.. 157 Book Reviews . 291 IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH Published under the auspices of the Vice President for Research, Iowa State University EDITOR .................................................. DUANE ISELY ASSOCIATE EDITOR .............................. KENNETH G. MADISON ASSOCIATE EDITOR ...................................... PAUL N. HINZ ASSOCIATE EDITOR . BRUCE W. MENZEL ASSOCIATE EDITOR ................................... RAND D. CONGER COMPOSITOR-ASSISTANT EDITOR ............... CHRISTINE V. McDANIEL Administrative Board N. L. Jacobson, Chairman J. E. Galejs, I. S. U. Library D. Isely, Editor W. H. Kelly, College of Sciences and Humanities W. R. Madden, Office of Business and Finance J. P. Mahlstede, Agriculture and Horne Economics Experiment Station W. M. Schmitt, Information Service G. K. Serovy, College of Engineering Editorial Board G. J. Musick, Associate Editor for Entomology, University of Arkansas Paul W. Unger, Associate Editor for Agronomy, USDA, Bushland, Texas Dwight W. Bensend, Associate Editor for Forestry, Hale, Missouri L. Glenn Smith, Associate Editor for Education, Northern Illinois Univ. Faye S. Yates, Promotion Specialist, I. S. U. Gerald Klonglan, Consultant for Sociology, I. S. U. All matters pertaining to subscriptions, remittances, etc. should be addressed to the Iowa State University Press, 2121 South State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010. Most back issues of the IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH are available. Single copies starting with Volume 55 are $7.50 each, plus postage. Prior issues are $4.50 each, plus postage. Because of limited stocks, payment is required prior to shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation
    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation Project ID(s): R01Y19P01: Quinault Indian Nation, fiscal year 2019 Project area The project area (Figure 1) is restricted to the Quinault Indian Nation, bounded by Grays Harbor Co. Jefferson Co. and the Olympic National Park. Appendix A: USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Queets, Salmon River West, Salmon River East, Matheny Ridge, Tunnel Island, O’Took Prairie, Thimble Mountain, Lake Quinault West, Lake Quinault East, Taholah, Shale Slough, Macafee Hill, Stevens Creek, Moclips, Carlisle. • < 0. Figure 1. QIN NWI+ 2019 project area (red outline). Source Imagery: Citation: For all quads listed above: See Appendix A Citation Information: Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office Publication Date: 2017 Publication place: Salt Lake City, Utah Title: Digital Orthoimagery Series of Washington Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data Other_Citation_Details: 1-meter and 1-foot, Natural Color and NIR-False Color Collateral Data: . USGS 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles . USGS – NHD – National Hydrography Dataset . USGS Topographic maps, 2013 . QIN LiDAR DEM (3 meter) and synthetic stream layer, 2015 . Previous National Wetlands Inventories for the project area . Soil Surveys, All Hydric Soils: Weyerhaeuser soil survey 1976, NRCS soil survey 2013 . QIN WET tables, field photos, and site descriptions, 2016 to 2019, Janice Martin, and Greg Eide Inventory Method: Wetland identification and interpretation was done “heads-up” using ArcMap versions 10.6.1. US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping contractors in Portland, Oregon completed the original aerial photo interpretation and wetland mapping. Primary authors: Nicholas Jones of SWCA Environmental Consulting. 100% Quality Control (QC) during the NWI mapping was provided by Michael Holscher of SWCA Environmental Consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Species List
    APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST Common Name Scientific Name State Class Status1 A Caddisfly Farula constricta OR Insect BS Adder’s-tongue Ophioglossum pusillum OR Plant BS Agave, Arizona Agave arizonica AZ Plant FE Agave, Murphey Agave murpheyi AZ Plant BS Agave, Santa Cruz Striped Agave parviflora AZ Plant BS Agoseris, Pink Agoseris lackschewitzii ID Plant BS Albatross, Short-tailed Phoebastris albatrus AK, CA Bird FE Alkaligrass, Howell’s Puccinellia howelli CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Lemon’s Puccinellia lemmonii CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Parish’s Puccinellia parishii CA, MT Plant BS Alpine-aster, Tall Oreostemma elatum CA Plant BS Alpine-parsley, Trotter’s Oreoxis trotteri UT Plant BS Alumroot, Duran’s Heuchera duranii CA Plant BS Amaranth, California Amaranthus californicus MT Plant BS Ambersnail, Kanab Oxyloma haydeni kanabensis AZ, UT Snail FE Ambrosia, San Diego Ambrosia pumila CA Plant FE Chlorogalum purpureum var. Amole, Purple CA Plant FT purpureum Amphipod, Malheur Cave Stygobromus hubbsi OR Crustacean BS Amphipod, Noel’s Gammarus desperatus NM Crustacean PE Angelica, King’s Angelica kingii ID Plant BS Angelica, Rough Angelica scabrida NV Plant BS Apachebush Apacheria chircahuensis NM Plant BS Apple, Indian Peraphyllum ramosissimum ID Plant BS Arrowhead, Sanford’s Sagittaria sanfordii CA Plant BS Aster, Gorman’s Eucephalus gormanii OR Plant BS Aster, Pygmy Eurybia pygmaea AK Plant BS Aster, Red Rock Canyon Ionactis caelestis NV Plant BS Avens, Mountain Senecio moresbiensis AK Plant BS Baccharis, Encinitis Baccharis vanessae CA Plant FT Balloonvine Cardiospermum corindum AZ Plant BS Balsamorhiza macrolepis var. Balsamroot, Big-scale CA Plant BS macrolepis Balsamroot, Large-leaved Balsamorhiza macrophylla MT Plant BS Balsamroot, Silky Balsamorhiza sericea CA Plant BS Balsamroot, Woolly Balsamorhiza hookeri var.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • 39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985
    39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Rules and Regulations reaction irreversibility or by formation polarography or square-wave (3) Irving, H., “The Stability of Metal of two or more complex species in polarography). Complexes and Their Measurement equilibrium with each other. In this last (3) Interpretation and evaluation of Polarographically," Advances ih case it is necessary to apply the method resu lts, (i) Stability constants Polarography Proceedings of the 2nd by De Ford and Hume paragraph (d) (8) determined for a new substance can be International Congress, Ed. I.S. of this section to calculate stepwise compared with literature values for Langmuir (Pergamon Press, 1960). formation constants. standard substances (see Reference (4) Perrin, D.D., Dempsey, B., B u ffe r (2) Test report, (i) The test report substances, above) and used therefore for pH and Metal Ion Controls. should list for each metal ion to evaluate the strength of its (Chapman and Hall: London, 1974). investigated the half-wave potential complexing ability. (5) “Stability Constants of Metal-ion Complexes,” Part B, Organic Ligands, Ei /2 , co-ordination number and overall (ii) The system is physically stability constant. Compiled by D.D. Perrin, IUPAC meaningful if (A) the value of the Publication on Chemical Data Series, stability constant is positive and (B) the (ii) In addition, the following should No. 22 (Pergamon Press, 1979) also be reported: standard error is less than the constant (6) Grabaric, B., Tkalcec, M., Piljac, L, (A) Type of polarisable micro­ (the t-test should be used as a criterion).
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rare Plant Advisory Group Sensitive Plant List -June 2014
    ARIZONA RARE PLANT ADVISORY GROUP SENSITIVE PLANT LIST -JUNE 2014 •.. -e 'I"': ~ ~ •.. ·s o 0 .g o rn u rn '•".. ..>: ::s ~ ~ ~ 0"' tU I': ~ ~ Z ..•.. ~ '" u ::... 0 ~ E 0 u -; •.. is '5 rn 0 0 ~ ;::l ~ "g u d iL< ..>: ~ 0 •.. ~ s •.... "B .. § 0 ; 0 ~ ~ U ~ il< < ~ E-< ~ VERY HIGH CONCERN Agave delamateri Hodgs. & Slauson Asparagaceae w.e L Tonto Basin Agave 7 7 7 c Asparagaceae Agave phillipsiana w.e Hodgs wand Canvon Centurv Plant 7 7 7 nc Aotragalus crt!mnophylax uar: crt!mnophylax Bameby Fabaceae Sentrv Milk-vetch 7 8 7.5 c AOfragalus holmgreniomm Bameby Fabaceae Holmgren (Paradox) Milk-vetch 7 7 7 c Orobanchaceae Castilleja mogollonica PeJ2lJell Mogollon Paintbrush 7 8 7.5 Lv c Apiaceae Eryngium sparganophyllum HemsL Ribbonleaf Button Snakeroot 6 8 7 v? nc Lotus meamsii var. equisolensis].L Anderson Fabaccae Horseshoe Deer Vetch 6 8 7 nc Cactaceae Pediacactus brat!Ji L Benson Brady Pincushion Cactus 7 7 7 c Boraginaceae Phacelia cronquistiana S.L Wel,.h Cronquist's Phacelia 7 8 7.5 nc PotClltil1a arizona Greene Rosaceae Arizone Cinquefoil 6 8 7 nc Sphaeralcea gierischii N.D. Atwood & S.L Welsh Malvaceae Gierisch globemallow 7 7 7 nc HIGH CONCERN Ranunculaceae Actaea arizonica (S. Watson) J. Compton Arizona Buzbane 6 6 6 c Agave murpheyi F. Gibson Asparagaeeae Hohokam Agave 6 6 6 c Asnaragaceae Agave yavapaiensis Yavapai Agave 6 7 6.5 ne Aletes macdougalli ssp. macdougaftiJM. Coulto & Rose Apiaceae MacDougal's Indian parsley 6 6 6 nc Alide/la cliffordii J.M. Potter Polernoniaceae Clifford's Gilia 5 7 6 nc Antic/ea vaginata Rydb.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Jessica's Aster
    Jessica’s Aster (Aster jessicae) Population Monitoring: Third-year Results Idaho Conservation Data Center Idaho Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25 Juanita Lichthardt Boise, Idaho Karen Gray 83707 2005 Report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ABSTRACT Jessica’s aster (Aster jessicae) is a tall, rhizomatous aster endemic to the Palouse region of southeastern Washington and adjacent Idaho. Its habitat has been severely reduced by conversion of this region to intensive agricultural uses. It is restricted almost entirely to private lands, and because of this, little was known of its distribution and abundance until a 1991 status survey was conducted. Five permanent monitoring plots were established in 2001, to track and compare populations occupying contrasting sites. Monitoring sites differ in amount of edge, degree of isolation from other populations, habitat extent, and amount of forest cover. This report summarizes three consecutive years of monitoring data. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]