Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) SWITZERLAND

EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SWITZERLAND

Year 2015 - Level 1

Picture © Jérémy Denton

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland Released Issue FOREWORD By Adriaan Heerbaart Director of the Pan European Single Sky Directorate EUROCONTROL Agency January 2016

Dear colleagues, The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents are the expression of commitment of civil and military National Organisations (Regulators and National Supervisory Authorities), Service Providers and Airport Operators, towards the implementation of the European ATM Master Plan. They provide a comprehensive view, for the benefit of the ATM community at large, of how ECAC States and stakeholders concerned are progressing in planning and deploying the mature elements of the European ATM Master Plan, as identified in its Level 3, namely the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. The ESSIP/LSSIP is a well-established and mature mechanism, with a long history dating back more than 20 years ago, originally named the Convergence & Implementation Programme (CIP), providing a stable platform for implementation planning, monitoring and reporting while continuously adapting to the changing environment. Thanks to the uninterrupted enhancement in the reliability and quality of information provided by national stakeholders, for the third year in a row the LSSIP documents and tools have been used as a support to the Performance Review Body (for CAPital EXpenditure - CAPEX - analysis) and recently also by ICAO for reporting on the deployment of the Aviation System Block Upgrade (ASBU) Modules in the European ICAO/EUR Region’s States, as part of their Global Air Navigation Plan. In addition, the current LSSIP 2015 documents will be used as a platform for collecting information on Military ATM on behalf of EDA, NATO and the EUROCONTROL Military Division. It is also the third year that the LSSIP Expert Group is established and has provided an invaluable support to DPS/PEPR in a number of crucial areas, i.e. the LSSIP process improvements, upgrade of IT tools and LSSIP Database, enhancement of the methodology on ESSIP Objectives progress determination, and in particular advising DPS/PEPR how to address the concerns surrounding any potential European multiple reporting. The need for coordination and cooperation between DPS/PEPR and the SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) has been recognised and addressed to the AAB 12 Meeting in June 2015, which noted the ongoing actions to find a common way to optimise reporting by relevant stakeholders, to maximise efficiency and avoid unnecessary duplications of work. Furthermore, the AAB noted the initiation of the adaptation of the LSSIP process and deliverables in terms of implementation progress, signature and overall responsibility of the LSSIP and advised the Agency to pursue its efforts towards minimising the impact of this adaptation on all concerned actors. The complementarity with the SDM process and the adaptation of the LSSIP process and deliverables were on the Agenda of the LSSIP 2015 Take-off meeting, 19-20 October, and its outcome will now provide a solid base for establishing a work plan to address the recommendations stemming from AAB 12, with the support of the LSSIP Expert Group. I would like again to thank you for the substantial effort spent on your contribution to this LSSIP document. I see this as a proof of your commitment to the principles of transparency and partnership, benefiting the entire ATM community.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Switzerland

Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-91

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland Edition Date: 24 February 2016

LSSIP Focal Point - Thierry BREGOU E-mail: Skyguide [email protected] Corporate Development Dpt

LSSIP Contact Person - Adriatik KOKONA E-mail: Unit DPS/PEPR [email protected]

Status Intended for

Working Draft  General Public 

Draft  Agency Stakeholders 

Proposed Issue  Restricted Audience 

Released Issue 

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Switzerland (CH) - TK\Year 2015\Released

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip 2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2015 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr 3 European ATM Portal Working - https://www.eatmportal.eu/working Public - https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 4 ESSIP Report 2014 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr 5 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor 6 Acronyms and http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries abbreviations 7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip 8 National AIP http://www.skyguide.ch/en/services/aim-services/shop/ 9 FABEC Performance Plan http://www.fabec.eu/fabec_homepage/en/Performance/Performance%20Plan/ RP2/2015-2019

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland Released Issue

APPROVAL SHEET

The following authority(ies) have approved the LSSIP 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland Released Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ...... 1 Introduction ...... 5 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ...... 6 1.1 Geographical Scope ...... 6 1.1.1 International Membership ...... 6 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ...... 6 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ...... 7 1.2 National Stakeholders ...... 8 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...... 8 1.2.2 Air Navigation Service Providers ...... 10 1.2.3 Airports ...... 13 1.2.4 Military Authorities ...... 13 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ...... 17 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Switzerland ...... 17 2.2 Geneva ACC ...... 18 2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011 - 2020 ...... 18 2.2.2 Summer 2015 Performance ...... 18 2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 ...... 19 2.3 Zurich ACC ...... 21 2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011 - 2020 ...... 21 2.3.2 Summer 2015 Performance ...... 21 2.3.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 ...... 21 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ...... 24 Chapter 4 - National Projects ...... 26 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ...... 31 5.1 FAB Co-ordination ...... 31 5.2 FAB Projects ...... 31 5.3 Regional cooperation ...... 41 5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives ...... 41 5.3.2 Regional Projects ...... 43 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ...... 50 6.1 Conventions ...... 50 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress ...... 51 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ...... 70

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Civil Aviation in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Federal Department for the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC).

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) – Safety Division - Infrastructure is the regulatory body charged by the Swiss Confederation to supervise ATM safety oversight within Swiss airspace. It is also the nominated NSA.

The integrated civil-military ANSP, Skyguide, provides services to both OAT and GAT traffic, in Swiss airspace and in adjacent airspace in neighbouring countries that has been delegated to its control, from Geneva and Zurich ACCs. Skyguide also provides services at the two national airports (Geneva and Zurich airports), as well as at the regional airports and at primarily military or joint civil-military aerodromes.

Technical investigations following accidents and/or incidents are carried out by the Swiss Transportation Safety Investigation Board (STSB) integrated into DETEC.

The Military Aviation Authority in Switzerland is assigned to the Commander in Chief of the Air Force. He deputises the Swiss Military Aviation Regulation (REMIL) with the respective tasks.

Switzerland is member state of the FABEC together with Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and The Netherlands.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

The implementation of the ESSIP objectives is progressing on schedule in Switzerland. Most of the objectives are completed, partially completed or planned.

Out of the 32 ESSIP objectives applicable to Switzerland, 26 are completed or partly completed, six are planned, two (ITY-AGVCS2, ATC02.5) of the latter being ‘planned to be late’, the corresponding implementation planning showing difficulties to meet the target date.

On the 9 and 7 ESSIP objectives that are airport-related for respectively Zürich and Geneva operational environments, 13 are completed, partly completed or planned in both Zürich and Geneva airports, one (ATC07.1 - AMAN) being late to be implemented in Geneva Airport and another one (AOP10 – Time Base Separation) not yet being planned

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 1 Released Issue

* FOC Date LSSIP 2015 - Switzerland █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives 2015 2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 <=2009

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air AOM13.1 Traffic (GAT) handling *

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management * [PCP] AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing [E] * [PCP] AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace [E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity ATC02.5 Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe ATC02.6 Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path ATC02.7 Monitor - level 2 * Implement automated support for conflict detection, ATC12.1 resolution support information and conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange ATC15 mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic * AMAN operations

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller ATC17 during Coordination and Transfer *

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in COM11 ATM *

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services *

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning *

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 * [PCP] FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [E] * [PCP] FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment [E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing *

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *

ITY-ACID Aircraft identification

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical ITY-ADQ information *

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 * Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements ITY-AGVCS2 below FL195 *

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 2 Released Issue * FOC Date LSSIP 2015 - Switzerland █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination ITY-COTR processes *

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) *

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability *

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV

NAV10 Implement APV procedures * Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations SAF10 caused by airspace infringements *

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives 2015 2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 <=2009 LSGG-Geneva Airport Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.1 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.2 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) * [PCP] AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan [E] *

ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures * Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ENV01 techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 (CEM) at Airports * LSZH-Zürich Airport Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.1 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.2 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) * [PCP] AOP10 Time Based Separation [E] [PCP] AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan [E] * Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances [PCP] AOP12 monitoring [E] *

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 3 Released Issue

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable ( does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 4 Released Issue Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2015.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

 Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

 Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

 Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

 Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

 Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

 Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 5 Released Issue

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership Switzerland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since ECAC  1955 (founding Member State) EUROCONTROL  1st July 1992 (adhesion) European Union  Switzerland is not a member of the European Union, but had concluded a Bilateral Agreement on Air transport which is in force since 1st June 2002; member without voting right at the Single Sky Committee EASA  Member without voting right since 1st December 2006 ICAO  1947 (founding Member State) NATO Switzerland takes part in NATO's Partnership for Peace Programme ITU 1865 (fonding Member State)

1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Swiss FIR (“FIR SWITZERLAND”). Swiss FIR includes the Principality of Liechtenstein and is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Austria, Italy, France and Germany. Recently, Germany and Switzerland agreed to align the FIR boundaries to the political borders in the area of Basel. Moreover, a very small part of the German airspace located north of the lake of Constance is still incorporated in the FIR Switzerland (since the Fifties, basically this has been done for historical reasons).

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 6 Released Issue

1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation The airspace classification within the Swiss FIR is described in the figure below.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 7 Released Issue

1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM/ANS in Switzerland are the following: - Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC) including its Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) and Swiss Transportation Safety Investigation Board (STSB); - Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport (DDPS), including the Swiss Air Force (SAF); - Skyguide, the Swiss joint civil-military ANSP, with its training center; - MeteoSchweiz/MeteoSuisse (MeteoSwiss), part of the Federal Department of Home Affairs (FDHA) ; - Genève Aéroport (Geneva Airport); - Flughafen Zürich AG (FZAG). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. In addition Engadin Airport AG provides ANS services (AFIS only) at Samedan airport (LSZS). With Skyguide and MeteoSchweiz/MeteoSuisse it forms the group of the three certified Single European Sky providers in Switzerland.

Figure 1: State diagram

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information Civil Aviation in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation Legal Basis responsible Rule-making FOCA SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz” SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst ” Safety Oversight FOCA, Section Air SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 3, Art. 40a Navigation Services and SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember Safety and Risk 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst ” Management with the support of other sections SR Number 748.222.3 „Verordnung des UVEK über die Ausweise für bestimmte Personalkategorien der Flugsicherungsdienste

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 8 Released Issue Enforcement actions in case of FOCA, Section SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 3, Art. 40a, Art. non-compliance with safety Standardisation and 91, Art. 91bis, Art. 92 regulatory requirements Sanctions SR Number 748.132.1 „Verordnung über den Flugsicherungsdienst“ SR Number 748.132.13 „Verordnung über den zivilen Flugwetterdienst“ SR Number 748.222.3 „Verordnung des UVEK über die Ausweise für bestimmte Personalkategorien der Flugsicherungsdienste“ Airspace FOCA (Section Airspace) SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 3, Art. 8a after consultation with the SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember Air force according to law 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst ” SR Number 748.121.11 "Verordnung über die Verkehrsregeln für Luftfahrzeuge", Art. 4 Economic DETEC and FOCA DETEC is the owner of the ANSP on behalf of the State; Section Economic Affairs FOCA is responsible for regulation and oversight. Environment FOCA, Section SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember Environmental Affairs 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst ” Security FOCA, Section Security SR Number 748.01 „Verordnung über die Luftfahrt vom 14. November 1973“ SR Number 748.122 „Verordnung des UVEK über die Sicherheitsmassnahmen im Luftverkehr vom 20. Juli 2009“ SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst ” Accident investigation Swiss Transportation SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz” Art. 22 ff. Safety Investigation SR Number 742.161 „Verordnung vom 17.12.2014 Board (STSB) über die Sicherheitsuntersuchung von Zwischenfällen im Verkehrswesen“ REGULATION (EU) No 996/2010 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL Occurrence Reporting FOCA, Safety Risk Directive 2003/42/EC (Collection, Evaluation & Management SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 20 Processing of Data Department, (SRM) SR Number 748.01 „Verordnung über die Luftfahrt vom 14. November 1973“, Art. 77 – 77g Implementation of EU Regulation 376/2014 in preparation Non punitive reporting system for Switzerland (SWANS) Occurrence Reporting Process FOCA Airprox Analysis Airprox Analysis Board ICAO DOC 7754; Part V.II (ATS – FASID, paragraph 24 (AAB) and attachment D)

1.2.1.2 Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) Civil aviation in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications, which approves the standard tariff that is included in the calculation of charges for over-flying, entering or leaving Swiss FIR. The Federal Office of Civil Aviation is the Swiss Regulatory Authority and is responsible for the certification of civil aircraft and equipment and supervises the safety of aviation in the national airspace. More information about FOCA can be found at: http://www.bazl.admin.ch/index.html?lang=en Through the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on air transport, the Joint Committee has been established. This Committee decides on the application of EU Regulations in Switzerland. The Joint Committee meets normally once a year in Nov/Dec (ordinary procedure); there could be an additional written adoption-procedure as necessary. Additionally, FOCA represents Switzerland, inter alia, at the EUROCONTROL (Provisional) Council, the Single Sky Committee, the Management Board of EASA, in the FABEC as well as in the concerned ICAO and ECAC groups.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 9 Released Issue The FOCA has been commissioned by the Swiss Confederation to supervise air traffic over the complete territory of Switzerland and has the responsibility of ensuring that the corresponding regulations are complied with.

The national air navigation services safety regulatory and oversight function is separated and independent from the service provision function. The Federal Office of Civil Aviation is the Swiss National Supervisory Authority (NSA).

Annual Report published: Y https://www.bazl.admin.ch/bazl/de/home/dokumentation/studien- und-berichte/jaehrliche-berichte/jahresbericht-2015.html

FOCA’s organisation chart is depicted in Annex B.

1.2.2 Air Navigation Service Providers

1.2.2.1 Skyguide

Name of the ANSP: Skyguide Governance: State-owned public Ownership: 99.91% of Skyguide capital is owned by company the State. Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y NIL ATC approach Y At Switzerland’s national airports in Geneva and Zurich, at the regional airports of Bern, Buochs, Grenchen, Les Eplatures, Lugano, St Gallen Altenrhein, Donaueschingen (D) and Friedrichshafen (D) and at the primarily military or joint civil-military aerodromes of Alpnach, Dübendorf, Emmen, Locarno, Meiringen, Payerne and Sion. ATC Aerodrome(s) Y On the Aerodromes Geneva and Zurich the ATS Services are delivered by the ANSP Skyguide. AMS Services in line with the AMS Rules of EASA, which will be established in the near future, are going to be provided by Genève Aéroport and Flughafen Zürich AG. AIS Y NIL CNS Y NIL MET N Provided by MeteoSchweiz/MeteoSuisse see below. ATCO training Y Training is provided for ATCO as well as for other safety related tasks (FIS, AFIS, ATFCM, SPVR, ATSEP) Others N NIL Additional information: Provision of services in Y Skyguide provides air navigation services over Austrian, French, German, other State(s): Liechtenstein and Italian areas.

Annual Report published: Y http://www.skyguide.ch/webpublications/Annual_Report_2014/en/index.htm

Cf. Skyguide’s organizational chart in Annex B.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 10 Released Issue

1.2.2.2 Meteo Swiss The responsibilities of MeteoSchweiz/MeteoSuisse - the monopoly air navigation service meteo provider in Switzerland - are as follows:

Name of the ANSP: MeteoSchweiz Governance: MeteoSwiss is part of the Ownership: State Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Services provided Y/N Comment MET Y National provider for weather and climate services in Switzerland. METAR/ TAF Y GAFOR Suisse Y AIRMET/ SIGMET Y SWC Y Significant Weather Chart

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 11 Released Issue

1.2.2.3 Engadin Airport The responsibilities of Engadin Airport - the air navigation service AFIS provider at Samedan airport (LSZS) - are as follows:

Name of the ANSP: Engadin Airport Governance: Public company Ownership: Private Services provided Y/N Comment AFIS Y AFIS only within the local flight information zone (FIZ)

1.2.2.4 ATC systems in use

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Commercial solutions and own development Upgrade[1] of the ATC system is performed or planned? Ongoing on a yearly basis Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2019 (GVA FDP replacement) ATC Unit GVA and ZRH ACCs

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Commercial solutions (In particular : RDPS: ARTAS/Comsoft, MSSR: Raytheon) Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? None Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2018 (PSR renewal) ATC Unit GVA and ZRH ACCs

When you answer this question please refer to the systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing system and surveillance data processing systems.

1.2.2.5 ATC units The ATC units in the Swiss airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks ER APP ER : L6 to L1, INI S, INI N, INIE Geneva 9 3 Swiss, French APP GVA : DEP, APC, FIN ER : M6 to M1, W, N, E, S Zurich 10 5 Swiss, German APP ZRH : APW, APE, DEP, FIN, CAP APP : DELTA GVA (SIO/EPL), Bern Regional n/a 3 Swiss (BRN/GRE), ARFA (SGA)

[1] Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 12 Released Issue

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information In Switzerland, two airports (Zurich and Geneva) have an 'international’ status with intercontinental flight connections. Other main aerodromes Berne-Belp, Lugano, Sion and St. Gallen-Altenrhein have a 'regional' status with a continental network. Since November 1999, the operator of the International Airport of Zürich, Flughafen Zürich AG is a private corporation. Since the 1st of January 1994, the International Airport of Geneva (Genève Aéroport), is a government-owned corporation managed by an Independent Public Establishment.

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan – Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. The LSSIP for Switzerland focuses on Zurich and Geneva airport being them the two airports with both an international status and more than 150 000 movements. Zurich Airport website address: http://www.flughafen-zuerich.ch/ Geneva Airport website address: http://www.gva.ch/

1.2.4 Military Authorities The Military Aviation in Switzerland is under direction of - The Commander in Chief of the Air Force - Swiss Air Force Staff - Operations of the Air Force - The Instruction Units - The Medical Institute for Aeronautics The Military Aviation Authority in Switzerland is assigned to the Commander in Chief of the Air Force. He deputises the Military Aviation Regulation (REMIL) with the respective tasks. REMIL represent Swiss military aviation interests, inter alia, at the EUROCONTROL (Provisional) Council, the Single Sky Committee, in the FABEC as well as in the NATO EAPC programme on Partnership for Peace. The Military Authorities’ roles are detailed below. SAF’s organisation chart is depicted in Annex B.

1.2.4.1 Regulatory role According to Art 106 of the Federal Aviation Act (SR 748.0) rules defined by the national law on aviation are only binding to military aviation if the Federal Council explicitly so declares. According to Art 2 of the Ordinance on the Rules of the Air (SR 748.121.11), the air force sets up specific rules in agreement with FOCA. The air force provides: • Air crew training and licensing for air force personnel; • The national, military Operations Manual (OM); • SAR-related tasks (search only)

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 13 Released Issue Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military N by national legal provisions? governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law, and / or Level of such legal provision: None Air Force Regulation Authority signing such legal provision: Federal Authority signing such legal provision: N/A Government, Federal Council (Bundesrat), Minister of Transport, Minister of Defence, Directorate of the Federal Office for Civil Aviation, Chief of Armed Forces, the Commander in Chief of the Air Force or his designated Deputy. These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N Aircrew Licensing Y Additional Information: There is one integrated civil and military (for OAT and GAT traffic) ANSP in Switzerland (Skyguide) overseen by FOCA Means used to inform airspace users (other than Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP N National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N Other: National VFR Manual Y Other: National VFR Manual N

Oversight

OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: Swiss Air Force Additional information:

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 14 Released Issue

1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route Y Skyguide En-Route Skyguide Approach/TMA Y Skyguide Approach/TMA Skyguide Airfield/TWR/GND Y Skyguide Airfield/TWR/GND Skyguide AIS Y Skyguide AIS Skyguide MET Y MeteoSwiss and Air Force MET MeteoSwiss SAR Y FOCA1 SAR FOCA TSA/TRA monitoring Y Skyguide FIS Skyguide and Engadin Airport Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information:

Military ANSP providing GAT Y If YES, since: 2001;Last Duration of the 6 years services SES certified? certification Certificate: :21/12/2012 Certificate issued by: FOCA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in Y accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: There is one integrated civil and military (for OAT and GAT traffic) ANSP in Switzerland (Skyguide) overseen by FOCA.

1.2.4.3 User role

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft OAT only N GAT only N Both OAT and GAT Y can fly?

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system N Under radar advisory service N 2

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM N 8.33 N Mode S Y ACAS Y Others:

1 FOCA delegates certain tasks to the air force and the REGA, the civil air rescue service. 2 Helicopters Low Flight Network in trial phase

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 15 Released Issue

1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military and Civil in Switzerland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Partly Remark : MIL aviation is excluded from the scope of EC. reg 216/2008 according to art.1(2). The process to improve the FUA conformity is under discussion between Skyguide, FOCA and SAF FUA Level 1 implemented: Partly Remark: The process to improve the L1 FUA is under discussion between Skyguide, FOCA and SAF FUA Level 2 implemented: Partly. Remark : The process to improve the L2 FUA is under discussion between skyguide, FOCA and the SAF FUA Level 3 implemented: Yes

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 16 Released Issue Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Switzerland

Switzerland - Annual IFR Movements 1.400.000

1.200.000

1.000.000

800.000

IFR flights IFR 600.000 IFR movements - Actuals

400.000 IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast 200.000 IFR movements - Low forecast A = Actual F = Forecast 0 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015) IFR flights yearly growth 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F H 1.9% 4.4% 3.6% 3.3% 2.9% 3.0% 2.4% Switzerland B -1.7% -2.4% 1.4% 1.6% 2.6% 2.1% 2.3% 2.1% 2.2% 1.4% L 1.2% 0.4% 0.3% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8%

2015 Traffic in Switzerland increased by 1.5% during Summer 2015 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2014.

2016-2020

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.7% and 3.4% for Switzerland during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.3%.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 17 Released Issue 2.2 Geneva ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011 - 2020

LSAGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

2500 1.0

0.9

2000 0.8

0.7

1500 0.6

0.5

1000 0.4 IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) (minutes Delay Enroute

500 0.2

0.1

0 0.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Peak Day Traffic 2104 2072 2050 2145 2154 Summer Traffic 1873 1848 1837 1876 1890 Yearly Traffic 1704 1654 1627 1654 1666 Summer Traffic Forecast 1924 1980 2021 2063 2112 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 1974 2041 2112 2183 2242 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 1882 1885 1907 1925 1948 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.20 0.04 0.14 0.15 0.09 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.16 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.07

*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015

2.2.2 Summer 2015 Performance

En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap + 0.7 % 154 (+2%) 0.27 0.09 No The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.15 minutes per flight in summer 2014 to 0.09 minutes per flight in summer 2015. 55% of delays were for the reason Weather, 33% for ATC Capacity, 7% for ATC Staffing, 3% for Airspace Management and 2% for ATC Equipment Capacity Plan +1% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes STAM measures implemented (MCP) Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool B2B connection, configuration plan and Yes capacity modifications sent automatically Flight Plan adherence Improvement in intruders detection and Yes reporting FABEC AD South-East Phase 1 : EUC25 Yes Successfully implemented Cross qualification of ATCOs (Upper/Lower) Yes Nearly all ATCOs now have both licences Recruitment as necessary to maintain the staffing levels Yes Still overstaffing Stripless step 3 (New Lower – Upgrade Upper) Successfully implemented and Step 4 as Yes well Maximum configuration: 8/9 sectors (5/6 + 3) Yes 6 + 3 sectors Summer 2015 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 154, which represents the capacity delivered during the Summer season in the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 147, and the peak 3 hour demand was 138.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 18 Released Issue

2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values LSAGACC 2016 2017 2018 2019 Annual 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Summer 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28

Capacity Profiles 2015 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2016 2017 2018 2019 H 155 1% 156 1% 161 3% 167 4% Ref. 155 1% 155 0% 156 1% 158 1% LSAG 154 L 154 0% 154 0% 155 1% 155 0% Open 155 1% 155 0% 156 1% 158 1% C/R 154 0% 155 1% 155 0% 157 1%

Capacity Plan 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 FABEC FRA FABEC FRA FABEC FRA Step 2 : H24 Step 3: Final Free Route Airspace Step 1 : WE DCTs with goal FRA DCTs military activity Volume FABEC ATFCM/ASM

Airspace Management Step 2 : CDM Advanced FUA procedures

LSGG Increase capacity from 40/h to 42/h Airport capacity (electronic strips and AMAN) Airport & TMA Network

Integration Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Management

Airspace

Procedures Cross qualification of ATCOs (Upper/Lower) Staffing Recruitment as necessary to maintain the staffing levels Stripless step 4 (New Lower – Harmonisation

Technical Upgrade Release Upper) Virtual centre Reassessment of sector Capacity capacities following CAPAN study Significant Events Max sectors 8/9 (5/6 + 2/3) 8/9 (5/6 + 2/3) (3+7)/(3+5) (3+7)/(3+5) (3+7)/(3+5) Capacity increase p.a. 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% Reference profile 1% 0% 1% 1% N/A

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 19 Released Issue Stripless: Step 4 : stripless lower sectors - 1-Dec-2015

Max sectors: From 2018 onwards, copflex will enable the Swiss-wide LM6 and LM7 sectors at some periods, so either 3 lower sectors + 7 upper sectors, or 3 lower sectors + 5 upper sectors + Additional information LM6/LM7 operated from ZRH ACC

The capacity enhancing measures might be cancelled out by the decrease in capacity linked to the cost reduction measures (which affect staff). Trainee classes for 2016 cancelled, so no new ATCOs in 2019.

The profiles shown in the graph below correspond to the capacity increases shown in the above "Capacity Plan" table, and only reflect ATFM en-route delays that are under skyguide managerial control (i.e. excluding weather, industrial action, etc.) contrarily to the EU-wide target that includes all regulation causes.

LSAGACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 180

170

160 hour)

per 150

140 (movements

profile 130

Capacity 120

110

100 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 155 155 156 158 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 155 155 156 158 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 154 155 155 157 Capacity Profile ‐ High 155 156 161 167 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 154 154 155 155 Capacity Baseline 151 154 2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 154 156 159 159 159

2016-2020 Planning Period Outlook Provided that traffic evolution remains at reasonable levels, Geneva ACC should continue to work at optimum delay level.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 20 Released Issue 2.3 Zurich ACC

2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011 - 2020

LSAZACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

3000 1.0

0.9 2500 0.8

0.7 2000 0.6

1500 0.5

0.4

IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR 1000 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) (minutes Delay Enroute

0.2 500 0.1

0 0.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Peak Day Traffic 2502 2504 2485 2499 2508 Summer Traffic 2273 2249 2211 2241 2249 Yearly Traffic 2078 2031 1975 1984 1997 Summer Traffic Forecast 2297 2346 2402 2449 2504 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2338 2429 2505 2576 2657 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2243 2238 2273 2290 2307 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.11 0.11 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.20 0.19 0.14 0.08 0.10

*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015

2.3.2 Summer 2015 Performance

En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap +0.4 % 177 (+2%) 0.29 0.11 No The average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.11 minutes per flight in Summer 2015, at the same level as in 2014. 67% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 27% for Weather, 4% for ATC Staffing and 1% for ATC Equipment. Capacity Plan +2% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes STAM measures implemented (MCP) Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool B2B connection, configuration plan and Yes capacity modifications sent automatically Flight Plan adherence Improvement in intruders detection and Yes reporting Recruitment as necessary to maintain the staffing levels Yes Still overstaffing Stripless step 3 Yes Successfully implemented Maximum configuration: 9 sectors Yes 9 sectors Summer 2015 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 177. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 170, and the peak 3 hour demand was 159.

2.3.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values LSAZACC 2016 2017 2018 2019 Annual 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Summer 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 21 Released Issue Capacity Profiles 2015 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2016201720182019 H 182 3% 189 4% 195 3% 201 3% Ref. 179 1% 183 2% 188 3% 191 2% LSAZ 177 L 177 0% 177 0% 178 1% 178 0% Open 179 1% 183 2% 188 3% 191 2% 177 0% 177 0% 179 1% 180 1% C/R Capacity Plan 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

FABEC FRA FABEC FRA FABEC FRA Step 2 : H24 Step 3: Final Free Route Airspace Step 1 : WE DCTs with goal FRA DCTs military activity Volume FABEC ATFCM/ASM

Airspace Management Step 2 : CDM Advanced FUA procedures

LSZH RECAT / Airport capacity LSZH iLVP LSZH ADW LSZH BR2014 ARSI Airport & TMA Network

Integration Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Management

Harmonisation Release / Upper Airspace Airspace Harmonisation and Optimisation (UHO) Procedures Staffing Recruitment as necessary to maintain the staffing levels Stripless step 4 Technical Virtual centre Reassessment of sector Capacity capacities following CAPAN study Significant Events Max sectors 9 10 (4+7)/(4+5) (4+7)/(4+5) (4+7)/(4+5) Capacity increase p.a. 1% 0% 4% 3% 0% Reference profile 1% 2% 3% 2% N/A Stripless: Step 4 : stripless - April 2016

Copflex (Virtual Centre) May 2018

CAPAN 2017 To assess impacts of both SLCH Step 4 and UHO. Capacity increases will apply in 2018 and 2019.

Max sectors: Additional information From 2018 onwards, copflex will enable the Swiss-wide LM6 and LM7 sectors at some periods, so either 4 lower sectors + 7 upper sectors, or 4 lower sectors + 5 upper sectors + LM6/LM7 operated from GVA ACC.

LSZH capacity enhancing measures:

- iLVP: reduction of the separation for Cat II/III in case of fog, +5 arrivals per hour

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 22 Released Issue for configuration North (arrivals rwy 14, departures rwy 16/28)

- RECAT: optimisation of wake turbulence categorisation, +2 arrivals per hour for

all rwy configurations

- ARSI (Advanced Runway Safety Improvement): +5 departures per hour in

configuration North, + 15 departures per hour in configuration South (arrivals rwy

34, departures rwy 28/32)

- MITRE's ADW (Arrival-Departure Window) tool: to be determined

- BR2014 (Betriebsreglement 2014): rapid rwy exits, separation minima,

SID/STAR modifications, +5 arrivals per hour in configurations East (arrivals rwy

28, departures rwy 32), +5 departures per hour in configuration South

- and South

LSAZACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 210

200

190 hour) 180 per

170 (movements 160 profile

150 Capacity 140

130

120 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 179 183 188 191 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 179 183 188 191 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 177 177 179 180 Capacity Profile ‐ High 182 189 195 201 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 177 177 178 178 Capacity Baseline 174 177 2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 179 179 186 192 192 2016-2020 Planning Period Outlook Zurich ACC should continue to work close to optimum delay level, provided that the traffic demand in M4, M5 and West sectors remains at manageable levels. The situation in these sectors will remain demanding until the implementation of the new stripless HMI and of UHO.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 23 Released Issue Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Switzerland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of Local FCM01, AOP03, ENV01, ITY-ADQ and COM10 to take corrective REC-2014-2 Stakeholders measures to reduce the implementation delays. Corrective actions taken: YES Description: ITY-ADQ  A proposed legal framework is in formal consultation within Switzerland and expected to be endorsed in 2017.  CH stkhs are pro-actively supporting the FOCA to achieve the implementation of ADQ in Switzerland and undertook corrective measures to keep the implementation foreseeable delay as low as possible.  For instance : o Skyguide AIM/services has grouped all activities for the implementation of ADQ into its Aeronautical Data Management Services Programme which is being monitored by the AIM Management and its implementation progress is regularly reported to FOCA. o Zurich Airport’s ADQ project team is essentially engaged in the work for the establishment of the national DCS and is working with other stakeholders in Switzerland towards full implementation of ADQ. The work on the ADQ Implementation is ongoing, however under consideration of the needed adoptions on the national legal framework and the complexity of the ADQ implementation processes ZRH (Zürich) Airport expects significant delay on implementation timeframe. o Geneva Airport is participating actively in the Swiss collaborative ADQ implementation plan and will fill its role as a data originator in line with the ADQ and national requirements according the national implementation timeframe.  CH stkhs are continuously progressing with the implementation of those elements of ADQ (e.g. in 2015 ITY-ADQ-ASP-03 has been completed) for which they are currently responsible ENV01  Skyguide enables Basic CDAs in Zürich and Geneva TMAs. Skyguide also participates to the SESAR Optimized Descent Profile project and through FABEC to the Task Force initiated by the SJU and led by Eurocontrol to clarify the CDO definition AOP12  The deployment of an Airport Safety Net tool is now planned with the on-going ARSI project deployment. COM10  COM10 is set to 'partly completed' because COM10-ASP03 (Extended ATSMHS) can't be fulfilled since Security aspects are not yet define for Extended ATSMHS. A re-evaluation of the SLoA timeline is needed. FCM01  FCM01 is set to 'partly completed' because ASP07 (Inform NM of aircraft holding for ATFM purposes) can't be fulfilled, Skyguide is awaiting from the NM a technical solution to transfer the data from the Skyguide system to the NM platform via B2B services. It needs to be noted that a vast majority of the ANSPs have set a 'not applicable' status to the SloA, often arguing on the absence of need for such functionality or the lack of interface with the NM. A re-evaluation of the operational need for this SLoA should be done.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 24 Released Issue REC-2014-06 The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal (equal to REC- and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger FAB ANSPs 2013-15) scale performance improvements to customers. Corrective actions taken: YES Description: The “FABEC ANSP Strategic Agenda”, contains, amongst others, all agreed planned and ongoing FABEC activities. Based on this Strategic Agenda the FABEC 5-Year-Work-Plan (5YWP) detailing all the activities, the time schedule and the required budget is developed. Both the Strategic Agenda and the 5YWP are revised twice a year. Besides, the OPS and TECH domains have jointly developed the FABEC roadmap containing the FABEC projects/activities and the ANSP local studies/projects that have a direct/indirect impact on the FABEC project implementation timeframe. This roadmap is also revised twice a year. In this way, it is made sure that an agreed ANSP work plan and roadmap is available, including the main system renewals. Within FABEC, dedicated Standing Committees address all operational, technical and SESAR matters and make sure that proper coordination is done among FABEC ANSPs to ensure proper interoperability between stakeholders. Even if common procurement is investigated, ANSPs should not be constrained on the “how” to implement functionalities and reach the performance objectives.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 25 Released Issue Chapter 4 - National Projects

Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution Activities FOCA CHIPS CHIPS (CH-wide From NAV03 Program being Safety, Capacity, At executive level: Skyguide Implementation Program for Oct. 2008 NAV10 restructured into Environment 3 meetings per SESAR oriented Objectives, chips2.0 year SAF ongoing ENV01 Cost Efficiency Activities and Technologies) is FZAG At management a country-wide coordination PBN: level: 6 meetings GA platform with all interested per year stakeholders. CHIPS aims at PBN capability is Swiss At expert level: the implementation of achieved. All aspects of Easy Jet various workshops innovations in Swiss aviation PBN are implemented. Rega system. While using PBN as 16 procedures At project level: AeCS first new technology the successfully in Steering VSF philosophy and concept of operation. committees established for AOPA CHIPS can be applied to other complex topics innovation topics. IFR In G w/o ATC: 1 project in realization at an airport, 4 projects in planning for helicopter landing sites 2 projects in planning for ENR Remote TWR: 1 project in realization SUR by MLAT: 1 project under review

FOCA eTOD CH Implementing the ICAO Annex From 2016 – 2019 INF07 Switzerland will Safety: Signing of a Skyguide 15 Chapter 10 for electronic (1st phase for implement eTOD within Mitigation of obstacle memorandum of Terrain and Obstacle Data. ADQ relevant the project Data collision risk especially understanding The implementation initiative is data) Collection Services. The is combined with between IAA and closely coordinated with legal framework will be additional adverse skyguide for FOCA. adapted accordingly by environmental implementing the FOCA. conditions (e.g. OEI Irish concept of and strong crosswind). operations based Improves situational on ASSET. awareness.

Capacity: Enabling informed decisions, and facilitating better use

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 26 Released Issue of available capacity (e.g. improved flight procedure design).

Cost effectiveness: Allows the design of fuel-effective performance based navigation procedures. Skyguide VC The aim of the VC programme From Jan/2011 ITY-SPI, Tranche 1 delivered four Cost efficiency, Programme is to transform skyguide into a to ITY- steps, including Mode-S Capacity, Safety, service-based organisation by Dec/2022 or later AGDL and CPDLC; today GVA contingency, business creating a single unit (albeit in (Upper and Lower Area continuity multiple locations) with fully Control) and ZRH harmonized methods and (Upper Area Control and operations, information, all flights in the lower procedures, technical means sectors but Zurich and equipment, by proceeding arrivals) are operating in a socially and politically stripless. Remaining acceptable manner and by harmonization issues supporting the ATM industry in and a sector Europe in developing into a optimisation will round modularised network of up tranche 1. competitive service providers. Tranche 2 has The VC programme delivers in developed the core tranches: architecture for the  Virtual Centre Tranche 1 future of skyguide. T2 is includes all initiatives to at the end of its initiation achieve harmonized phase. The plan is to operations, based on fully start the realisation in stripless HMI as well as Q2 2016. optimised sectorisation In Tranche 3 various for the managed studies are performed, airspace. and in Tranche 4 two  Virtual Centre Tranche 2 trials are running, linked includes all initiatives to to SESAR initiatives. achieve a combined airspace cross centres on FL375 and above, based on a hybrid architecture containing “legacy” components as well as new (standardized) service oriented components, running on an Entreprise Service Bus.  Virtual Centre Tranche 3

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 27 Released Issue aims at lowering the cross-centre combination of sectors down to FL245 and finalising the service oriented technical infrastructure.  Virtual Centre Tranche 4 aims at implementing new operational concepts and external services (e.g. like Coflight as a service) according to availability and economic efficiency.

The timeline is as follows :  2016 : Fully stripless operations  2017 : Flexible operations step 1  2019 : Fully flexible operations  2021 : Flexible sector setup / External services

Skyguide/FOCA ADMS/ ADQ Implementation of the EC From 2011-2019 ITY- ADQ concept CH Safety: Implementati Regulation 73/2010 ADQ developed and State Contributing by quality on respectively 1029/2014 (ADQ mandate AIM in assured data and IR) laying down requirements progress. information fit for on the quality of aeronautical A project for a data purpose and ensuring data and aeronautical driven AIP production timeliness and information for the single has been launched. integrity. European sky including New EAD Agreement is additional national signed. Capacity: requirements (determined by Contributing to EAD migration for FOCA). capacity and demand Minimum Static Data The Aeronautical Data Quality completed, full Static balancing by Implementation Concept CH determining capacity Data migration in (Switzerland) has been levels resulting from progress. prepared and national legal the aeronautical baseline is adjusted and in A Data Collection information common consultation process to be Services (DCS) operating picture and endorsed in 2017. feasibility study was environmental conducted on behalf of Skyguide has responded with conditions reducing FOCA. an appropriate programme to capacity from implement this concept by The DCS engineered capacity

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 28 Released Issue establishing the required implementation project levels. Aeronautical Data (covering eTOD) will Management Services start early 2016. Cost effectiveness: (ADMS) covering all transition activities until 2019. Automated data chain. Skyguide Integrated Introduction of Integrated 2013 – 2017 Integrated Briefing Safety: Briefing Briefing Services providing Services are introduced Timely and quality Services AIS and MET information as as desktop application, assured integrated (IBS) well as FPL functions to pilots. mobile application being briefing information to developed. pilots as well as FPL submissions.

Capacity: Quality checked entry of FPL data thus contributing to a better flow management.

Cost effectiveness: Staff reduction due to highly automated FPL handling. Skyguide Datacom n.a Description: Initiation : COM 09  The concepts have Cost-efficiency n.a. Rollout SGN  Implement a new 25.03.2013 been defined and (500% increase in telecommunication chosen bandwidth/cost ratio network connecting Implementation:  The requirements for data exchanges between concerned Skyguide regional sites from July 2014 have been Skyguide ATS Units) (i.e.: ATS Units serving until January 2015 collected and LSMD, LSZB, LSMA, agreed among LSZR, LSZC, LSME, concerned LSZG, LSMO/LSZO, stakeholders LSMM, LSMS/LSGS)  A Network Architectural Objectives: Design has been  To provide a achieved communications network  A Request for that fulfils today's and Proposal has been future needs of sent to Equipment concerned Skyguide ATS Manufacturers and Units on regional sites Telecom Operators  To maintain or even  Decision for lower the OPEX of the realisation has Skyguide ATS Units in been approved in communications domain December 2013 including a x5 gross  Rollout has started bandwidth increase in August 2014 and  To provide capabilities was finished in

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 29 Released Issue and scalability lacking January February today 2015, including migration of all services and decommissioning of old 2Mbps leased lines.  This technology, proven reliable and successful, will be reused for further deployment, such as CNS sites and other remote locations … potentially for international interconnections facing 2Mbps leased lines phase- out from telecom operators.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 30 Released Issue Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 FAB Co-ordination FAB Europe Central (FABEC) consists of the following states: Belgium, France, Germany, Luxemburg, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The FABEC Feasibility Phase (2006-2008) led to the conclusion that FABEC is feasible. The Implementation Phase (2008-2013) demonstrated that the FABEC structure was compliant with SES regulations. After the ratification of the FABEC Treaty by all FABEC States, FABEC formally entered into force on the 1st of June 2013. This means that FABEC is now operational. FABEC intends to deliver on the goals set by SES II and as laid down in the FABEC Performance Plan. FABEC intends to provide capacity, avoid bottlenecks, reduce costs and emissions, make flying more efficient and ensure military mission effectiveness, while maintaining the high safety standards that exist over Europe. To achieve this, FABEC is developing a set of projects which are described in the next section.

5.2 FAB Projects On the following pages, tables detail for each ongoing main FABEC project:  which ANSPs and military partners are participating  a description, the scope and objectives  the schedule and implementation planning  the status end 2015  the link to the ESSIP, if any  the expected performance contribution to the SES KPAs capacity, safety, environment and cost- efficiency

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 31 Released Issue

Project Name: Airspace Design South-East Project Code: AD SE Organisation(s)  ANA LUX  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  MUAC  Skyguide  Military partners of: B, CH, D, F and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The scope of the South East airspace project consists of 2 main airspace changes: 1. EUC22 Establish a new Cross Border Area (CBA) EUC22 for use by the French, German and United States Air Forces. This EUC 22 will increase the amount of airspace available for civilian use in the LUX area. This additional airspace will allow for optimisation of the civil route network (SWAP) and will assist the various Airspace Projects around the LUX area to achieve their performance targets. A stepwise approach was chosen for the implementation of the EUC22. 2. SWAP In the current situation, the flows of traffic on UN852 and UN853 cross twice, once in Brussels UIR at the DIK waypoint, and again to the north of Geneva. The SWAP concept intends to remove this dual crossing to improve safety and increase the capacity of the network by:  De-conflicting upper air routes UN852 and UN853 by swapping the direction of the traffic flows  Creating duplicate parallel routes to allow for segregation of over flights from climbing and descending flights The volume, boundaries and internal partitions of the former CBA25 (French-Swiss Cross border Area) have been redefined in order to create the EUC25 in March 2015 to ensure sufficient civil airspace for the new Geneva SIDs & STARs that will be implemented to join the SWAP network.

Schedule/Implementation planning To facilitate the implementation, the project has been divided into three phases: Phase 1 EUC25 Phase 2 SWAP and new EUC22 step 1 Phase 3 FULL EUC22

As the project is now “suspended” the implementation planning is To Be Defined.

Status Phase 1 was successfully implemented in March 2015. Phase 2: Significant operational and technical concerns were raised during training sessions using large scale simulations; these concerns were considered as too important for an implementation in March 2016. As a result, in December 2015 the project has been “suspended”. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM20: Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) – Version 7. (Objective set to “Achieved” and removed from ESSIP ed.2014) Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Project under re-evaluation.

Safety Project under re-evaluation. Environment Project under re-evaluation. (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency Project under re-evaluation.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 32 Released Issue

Airspace Design Project Name: Project Code: AD CBALCW CBA Land/Central West Organisation(s)  DFS  LVNL  MUAC  Military partners of: D and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The objective of the CBA Land/Central West project is to design and implement an optimised ATS structure of the FABEC Central West area and of the North area which also includes a CBA Land. Based on known constraints in current airspace design, the objectives of the project are to:  Release military airspace in the south of the Netherlands, to create increased civil capacity and more direct civil routes for the hub airports London, Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.  To compensate the military airspace users, to implement a larger consolidated Cross-border exercise area to accommodate legacy as well as fifth generation fighter training operations.

Schedule/Implementation planning In the original work planning two implementation steps were foreseen: Step 1 This step implements the new and changed sectorisation and ATS route structures related to the Northern area and the core area of CBA Land military cross-border area over Northern Netherlands and Germany. The implementation also requires improved ASM arrangements and initial GAT route network improvements in the southern part and it will also implement the required cross-border ATM legislation, rules and procedures. Step 2 This step completes the full implementation of CBA Land/Central West project. It will implement the restructuring of the airspace structure in the southern part and allow full release of a MIL training area (TRA12) in the South- East of the Netherlands and the implementation of the 4th IAF for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, resulting in direct routings in the lower and upper airspace. At the same time the end state of the CBA will be implemented.

As the project is now “suspended” the implementation planning is TBD. Status The airspace and route design has been developed and successfully validated. In October 2015 the project has been “suspended”. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM20: Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) – Version 7. (Objective set to “Achieved” and removed from ESSIP ed.2014) Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. Safety To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. Environment To be re-evaluated if project is restarted. (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency To be re-evaluated if project is restarted.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 33 Released Issue

Project Name: AIM Task Force Project Code: AIM Organisation(s)  ANA LUX  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  LVNL  MUAC  Skyguide  Military partners of BE and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The AIM Task Force has three areas of activities:  Harmonisation of aeronautical information inside the FABEC area  Creation of a consistent FABEC ATM Data Set  Provisions for an efficient management of the FABEC ATM Data Set Schedule/Implementation planning The AIM Task Force received revised priorities. The work plan 2015/2016 was changed accordingly. Status The team started its new activities in June 2015. Two deliverables (AIM P-2 and AIM P-3) are completed and handed over to the FABEC AIM Steering Group. AIM TF plans to finalize the present deliverables by end 2016. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - ITY-ADQ: Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information. PCP: - AF5: Initial System Wide Information Management. Deployment Programme DP 2015: - FT 5.3.3: Interface to Network Management System (NMS) > Aeronautical Information Exchange Centralised Services: - CS5: European ATM Information Management Service (EAIMS) Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity N/A Safety Harmonised aeronautical information, avoiding duplications or ambiguities, significantly contributes to ATM safety. Environment FABEC wide harmonised data sets available from a single source will allow for improved flight (including flight planning. efficiency) Cost efficiency Expected: A significant positive impact on the cost efficiency of e.g. Airspace Design Projects as cross-border data becomes readily and seamlessly available.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 34 Released Issue

Project Name: FABEC ATFCM/ASM Project Project Code: FAAP Organisation(s)  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  LVNL  MUAC  Skyguide  Military partners of: BE, DE, FR and NL Description/Scope/Objectives The aim of this project is to develop ASM solutions, addressing both civil and military airspace user’s needs. All AMC responsibilities are remaining as they currently are but AMCs should use interoperable tools to enhance data exchange/sharing and coordination between stakeholders. A stepped approach will give sufficient time to take advantage of future achievements of on-going FUA related activities (e.g. FUA harmonization, Booking Principles and Priority Rules (D7.1)) and to acquire the necessary confidence in and the appropriate knowledge of working methods between stakeholders. Furthermore, DFS and DSNA joined in a bilateral initiative (BILINI) to support FAAP developments. Schedule/Implementation planning Step 1: Provide a FABEC airspace status overview (FASO) and enhance the cooperation between AMCs.

FAAP started to further develop the FASO tool. This is done by taking into account requirements from airspace design projects and related initiatives. The task includes further the development of general requirements and the technical implementation of FASO.

Status In November 2014, Step 1 has been implemented successfully. Subsequent steps are currently under discussion at the level of the Standing Committee Operations. Until agreement on the future of the FABEC ATFCM/ASM Project (FAAP) has been reached, the Standing Committee Operations decided to limit the scope of FAAP to further develop the FABEC Airspace Status Overview (FASO) by taking into account requirements from airspace design projects. In the framework of the bilateral initiative DFS – DSNA a trial is executed from 12/11/2015 until 04/02/2016 to validate AMC coordination to optimize the availability of cross-border CDR routeing (City Pair Paris – Munich). Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM19 : Implement Advanced Airspace Management PCP: - AF3.1.1 & 3.2: Airspace Management and Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Deployment Programme DP 2015: - Family 3.1.1: (Initial) ASM Tool to support AFUA Centralised Services: - CS4: Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Step 1 The main objectives of Step 1 focussed on the preparation of further Steps: analysis and description of local working methods, defining additional working methods, and set-up of an information sharing process. As such Step 1 did not deliver any performance benefits as far as it concerns the 5 KPAs contained in the FABEC Performance Plan. Further Steps TBD

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 35 Released Issue

Project Name: Free Route Airspace Project Code: FRA Organisation(s)  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  LVNL  MUAC  Skyguide  Military partners of: BE, DE, FR, NL and CH Description/Scope/Objectives The FRA programme aims at developing and implementing a Free Route Airspace FABEC wide. The objective of the FRA implementation is to give users opportunities to improve the horizontal flight efficiency through both plannable direct routes and at a later stage defined volume/s of Free Route Airspace within FABEC airspace. The FRA programme defines a stepped and gradual implementation approach where FABEC ACCs will develop and implement various iterations of Free Route Airspace.

Schedule/Implementation planning The FABEC FRA project was launched in 2011 with the objective of setting up a FABEC Free Route Airspace with A-FUA at FL 365 (and lower when and where possible) in a stepped approach by the end of RP2. In 2015, the project has been aligned with the requirements of Pilot Common Project requirements. This induced an implementation of FABEC Free Route Airspace FL310+ by 2022. Since the feasibility to achieve the implementation of Free Route at FL 310 in the whole FABEC airspace (and at all time), especially in high density airspace, is not yet proven, a stepwise approach will be chosen. The stepwise implementation may start at higher Flight Levels and/or in parts of FABEC airspace with lower traffic density and may be time and/or area restricted. The different situation at FABEC ANSP's such as system functionalities, system implementation plans as also the MME shall be taken into account.”All Free Route initiatives conducted locally, bilaterally or within a FABEC framework are under the FABEC FRA umbrella. Free Route activities which are not directly conducted within FABEC working groups are managed at ACC or national level using local management processes and are monitored at FABEC level. The Project focuses on the launch of FRA implementation whilst continuing the Direct Routing implementation, moving from three steps to three parallel work streams. Each work stream develops a specific concept:  Stream 1: National and cross border DCTs  Stream 2: Long Range Direct Routing Mil OFF/Mil ON  Stream 3: Initial Free Routing Status  For all ANSP’s, stream 1 and 2 implementations have begun and are on-going.  For DFS and MUAC, initial implementations of Free Routing are planned by 2017. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - AOM21.1: Implementation of Direct Routing - AOM 21.2: Implementation of Free Route Airspace PCP: - AF3.1.2, 3.2 & 3.3: Free Route Deployment Programme DP 2015: - Family 3.2.1: Upgrade of ATM systems (NM, ANSPs, AUs) to support Direct Routings (DCTs) and Free Routing Airspace (FRA) - Family 3.2.3: Implement Published Direct Routings (DCTs) - Family 3.2.4: Implement Free Route Airspace Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Capacity benefits could be foreseen since reduced average transit times may result in an increase in capacity. Capacity benefits may also be possible if there is proven to be a reduced number of conflicts, fewer redirects, and the resulting impact on controller tools. However it is also possible that in some cases conflicts may become more complex and other or new choke points may emerge. Hence the overall impact of FRA on sector capacity cannot be determined without simulations. Safety No impact. Environment FRA allows airspace users to fly direct routes, thus reducing flight distance flown, with (including flight consequent savings in fuel and direct and strategic operating costs. There are environmental efficiency) benefits from savings in CO2-emissions. Cost efficiency Investments at ANSP-level will deliver benefits in financial terms to users, but not to ANSPs.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 36 Released Issue

Project Name: Extended Arrival Management Project Code: XMAN Organisation(s)  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  LVNL  MUAC  Skyguide  NATS Description/Scope/Objectives The XMAN/AMAN project will develop and implement a harmonised approach to arrival management in the core area of Europe because it has to rely on cross-centre and cross-border processes and procedures. The implementation of XMAN will improve and optimise arrival management operations for the major 5 airports/TMAs as well as for other selected intermediate airports as defined by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 716/2014. One of the main characteristics of the XMAN project is the extension of the planning horizon of arrival management systems (AMAN) from the local TMA into the airspace of upstream control centres. The final extension of arrival management operations is expected to reach as far as 200 NM or even beyond, depending on the operational environment and the needs of the stakeholders. These extended planning horizons will cover almost the entire FABEC airspace and, as a consequence, most of the FABEC control centres will be affected by extended AMAN operations and some of them will need to feed several arrival streams for different airports/TMAs. Schedule/Implementation planning The XMAN project envisages 3 development and implementation steps: Basic - from 2012 to 2017 The Basic Step uses the currently available systems and technologies in order to establish cross-centre arrival management in the airspace controlled by DFS, LVNL, MUAC, DSNA and NATS. Advanced - from 2013 to 2023 The Advanced Step will take into account validated SESAR results concerning Time Based Flow Management (TBFM) in order to improve the en-route part of cross-centre arrival management in the overall FABEC airspace. This step also requires enhanced data exchange between ACC/UAC in order to support a delay sharing strategy. Additional planning information related to departures and airborne flights will be used to be provided by Airport- CDM and/or Network Management. This step has potentially an impact on all FABEC ACCs. Optimised - from 2017 to 2023 The Optimised Step will take into account further validated SESAR results and will optimize the cooperation between arrival management and Airport-CDM, Aircraft Operators and Network Management in order to widely share Arrival Management (AM) information between all partners and to process and to apply Arrival Management information where needed. Status The FABEC XMAN Basic Step definition has been finalized in September 2015. The concept development of the Advanced Step has been finalized in November 2014. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: - ATC07.1: Implement arrival management tools. - ATC15: Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations. PCP: - AF1: Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMA Deployment Programme DP 2015: - Family 1.1.1: Basic AMAN - Family 1.1.2: AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Improved average punctuality: small positive effect. Better forecast for sector loads: small positive effect. Reduced controller workload: no significant effect. Safety Improved situational awareness: small positive effect. Reduced tactical interventions: small positive effect.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 37 Released Issue Environment Reduction of: (including flight  Track miles and holdings: small positive effect; efficiency)  Fuel burn: large positive effect;  CO2/NOX emissions: large positive effect. Cost efficiency From ANSP point of view: large negative effect (investment cost without financial return for ANSP).

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 38 Released Issue

Project Name: Flow Optimisation Concept Scenario Project Code: FOCS Organisation(s)  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  MUAC  NATS Description/Scope/Objectives The overall objective of the FOCS Project is to develop, to validate (when applicable) and to implement the different tabled implementation packages defined during the FOCS Study, while taking the most recent changes of the FABEC airspace into account. For RP3, an updated problem statement will be developed in Q4 2016 which will be the basis for further work for this reference period.

FOCS area

Schedule/Implementation planning The Local Implementation Packages will be fully executed and managed locally (ASM and VFE improvements, CBA100, French corner). For these elements the FOCS Project only ensures FABEC monitoring. As such, their planning is done at local level and not in scope. For the Implementation Packages (IPs) West (W) and East-South (ES), work is planned in two parallel streams (W and ES). Each stream has its own set of PLC milestones.  The phase up to MS2 will focus on achieving an agreement on the overall design (for West) or on a shortlist of acceptable overall designs (for ES).  The phase up to MS3 will use real-time simulations to select and validate the final design for ES. The W and ES designs will be further elaborated to a level of detail allowing actual implementation. The safety and performance work up to MS2 will be limited to monitoring of progress. Furthermore, the technical domain is not involved at this stage. The bulk of the work up to MS2 will therefore be done by the PMT, which has a mixed attendance of civil and military operational experts. The PMT will handle both streams of work (W, ES). Expected availability of PMT members drives the rate of progress in the current planning.

Status The FOCS project is in the launch phase and its scope may be revisited in 2016. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: n/a Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Still to be determined. Safety Shall not deteriorate. Environment Still to be determined. (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency Still to be determined.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 39 Released Issue

Implementation of Common Cost CCM level II Project Name: Project Code: Management level II Organisation(s)  ANA LUX  Belgocontrol  DFS  DSNA  LVNL  MUAC  Skyguide Description/Scope/Objectives The common planning of financial aspects (investments, cost savings, etc.) between ANSPs is considered the next step towards an aligned financial framework. The project will analyse which cost items can commonly be planned, which synergies can be derived and which consequences can be derived from the obtained information. Schedule/Implementation planning 2015-2016 Status Ongoing; started in 2015. Link to ESSIP (ATM Master Plan Level 3) / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ESSIP: n/a Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity N/A Safety N/A Environment N/A (including flight efficiency) Cost efficiency The project should be the baseline for future financial cooperation and hence an enabler for future benefits in Cost Efficiency without actually delivering own elements of cost saving.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 40 Released Issue

5.3 Regional cooperation

5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives

Name Partners Planning Status Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM services Operational and strategic work packages are considered as The cooperation is based on a signed data publication process - DSNA/SIA (F) DSNA/SIA appropriate for strengthening the collaboration of the two agreement between Skyguide AIM services and DSNA/SIA. partners. The AIM cooperation is managed by a joint steering group In line with FABEC goals, aeronautical data and process (Comité de Pilotage) agreeing the common work packages and harmonisation issues are continuously being addressed and setting the priorities. resolved within the current formal agreement. A revision of this formal agreement is planned and will include elements A formal harmonised workflow for cross-border publications is such as Mandatory Coordination Area, EAD upload cross- successfully being applied in support of ATM. The experience border responsibilities and first elements of the ADQ gained is shared with the appropriate FABEC AIM expert teams. Regulation. SIA and skyguide AIM services are in the process of arranging to Co-ordination of publication issues related to FABEC project exchange digital aeronautical data. SE phases 1 and 2. An analysis for COFLIGHT data requirements has been performed by SIA and jointly evaluated. A common operated AIS Web Shop has been offered to FABEC partners, but no agreement was found.

A potential expansion towards digital products is foreseen.

Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM services A formal AIM agreement is planned and will include The establishment of a formal AIM agreement between ACG and - Austro Control (A) ACG AIM elements such as the operational geographical border line, skyguide AIM services is in progress. Mandatory Coordination Area, EAD upload cross-border Agreement on an enhanced operational geographical border line responsibilities and first elements of the ADQ regulation. for EAD is reached. Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM services Utilise the RAIM service based on the formal agreement Currently, skyguide gets RAIM predictions on the existing DFS – DFS (D) DFS signed with DFS in March 2011 (publication of RAIM RAIM prediction tool for the following aerodromes: LSZH, LSZR NOTAM to support RNAV (GNSS) approaches in LSGC, LSZB, LSZG, LSME, LSMD, LSMP, LSGG and LSGS. Switzerland). Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM services A formal AIM agreement is planned and will include The establishment of a formal AIM agreement between ENAV – ENAV (I) ENAV AIM elements such as an enhanced operational geographical and skyguide AIM services is in progress. border line, Mandatory Coordination Area, EAD upload Agreement on an enhanced operational geographical border line cross-border responsibilities and fist elements of the ADQ for EAD is on the way of being approved. regulation. Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM services Collaboration with Ireland to introduce an ADQ compliant The development of a Framework Agreement with IAA is in – IAA (Ireland) IAA data collection service in Switzerland covering the progress. implementation of eTOD.

Auditing Cooperation Skyguide Common audit program 2016 will be established; for the first IntACT (International Audit Cooperation Team) with DFS, DSNA (Framework for FABEC) DFS time, in 2016 the three new partners will perform IntACT and Skyguide had been enlarged - in 2015 Belgocontrol, ANA

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 41 Released Issue DSNA audits within their organization. Luxembourg and MUAC joined the cooperation. The letter of New: Understanding, the basis for the cooperation, had been signed by the CEOs of the participating ANSPs. Common audits are Belgocontrol performed according to the annual audit program. ANA Luxembourg MUAC FCS Skyguide (through Skynav) Continuation of collaboration Collaboration actively pursued. Flight Calibration Services DFS Proof of compliance of calibration of our installations with ICAO Austrocontrol regulations & EUROCONTROL recommendations ESSP Skyguide The ESSP, has declared the start of the EGNOS Safety-of- Contract signed with the European Commission entitling the European Satellite Services DFS Life Service (SoL Service) as of 2 March 2011 following EC ESSP-SAS to become the EGNOS system operator and authorization to provide the service. EGNOS Safety of Life (SoL) service provider. Provider DSNA ESSP certificated as a navigation service provider by EASA was ENAIRE renewed in 2014 for two more years The service contract (ESP) NATS was attributed to the ESSP following a Call for Tender in 2013. It ENAV entered into force the 01.01.2014 for a duration of 8 years. NAV Portugal Due to changes in EU regulation, the competent NSA is the EASA (for this pan-european service).

SESAR Skyguide Final agreement reached by Q1/2011 Skyguide became associate partner of the DFS and the DSNA in DFS July 2010 DSNA SESAR Joint Undertaking

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 42 Released Issue

5.3.2 Regional Projects

Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities

DSNA COFLIGHT/ Coflight V2R1FAT Skyguide is member of Cost Efficiency, FDPS and Service ENAV eFDP has been delivered the Program since Capacity development skyguide (Flight Data and validated in 2005, the final Processing) March 2015 as agreement has been planned. This is signed in 2007 and considered as the updated in 2014. first complete and Skyguide's participation usable deliverable to the Coflight Program out of the Coflight has changed in 2014 project. according to the new The next major strategy based on the release following Virtual Center concept. this version, the Hence, the study V3+, will be finally 'Coflight as a service' validated and was launched in delivered in May December 2014, in the 2016.A framework of a supplementary cooperation agreement fixing release between DSNA, ENAV, (currently named skyguide and MATS, V3++) is planned to the first two being be delivered in potential future eFDP September 2016 in providers and the support to the latter potential eFDP 4Flight program customers. The study exercises. This will will last until end of be the last 2016 and will include deliverable under trials based on the the existing Coflight SESAR B04.04 results. contract. A new

contract is in preparation that will most probably include supplementary releases for an expected

3 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 43 Released Issue Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities operational usage at the end of 2018 inside the 4Flight deployment in a French centre. SKYGUIDE (lead) SETInet n.a. Description: Initiation : COM 09 Achieved with DFS, Cost-efficiency: Common design, DSNA International  Decision for Bordeaux 1Q 2008 ENAV, DSNA and hundreds of % solution and ENAV TDM has been taken end of AUSTROCONTROL increase in implementation (via DFS). SETINET is DFS communicati 2014, as it is highly bandwidth/cost ratio Implementation: connected to MONIQUE AUSTROCONTR ons strategic for FABEC to for data exchanges interconnecti from 4Q 2011 until (DFS & Benelux) since between concerned OL solve low speed leased ons lines phase-out 14Q 2015 2005. organizations ENAIRE between France and Interconnections Spain. Deployment is between DSNA planned for 1Q has (Bordeaux) and been realized during ENAIRE (Madrid- 2Q-3Q 2015, while full Barcelona) almost operational production signed deployed and is planned from operational since December 2015. December 2015.  In order to be able to face decommissioning Decommissioning of of international 2 Mbps international 2 Mbps leased lines by telecom leased lines by telecom operators, a pilot over operators will probably IP/MPLS is planned need a migration over between Geneva IP/MPLS and/or (skyguide) and Ethernet. The latter Toulouse (DSNA) might be as well driven by the phase-out of Objectives: TDM products by equipment  to provide secure, safe manufacturer. Therefore and reliable network the approach will be a services (voice, legacy technological transition data, Ethernet) for on a bilateral and case- operational purpose by-case basis, provided between the mentioned the IP/MPLS pilot organizations (between DSNA and skyguide) is proven reliable and safe.

SKYGUIDE (lead) SETInet n.a. Description: Initiation : COM 09  FABEC is Cost-efficiency: Common design, interconnected by solution and FABEC International  PENS 1 being is not 1Q 2009 Sounds savings due to means of IP implementation

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 44 Released Issue Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities ENAV IP sufficiently safe, nor routing over the reuse of existing AUSTROCONTR communicati secure, nor reliable nor Implementation: SETINET & lines, equipment, and OL* ons mature in its current MONIQUE (TDM infrastructure interconnecti contractual framework from 1Q 2010 until networks). This

ons (until 20187). some 1Q 2015 interconnection * new Safety: FABIEN NewPENS 2 initiatives network is named (FABEC are currently taken FABIEN (FABEC Expected availability Interconnecti under 1) the PSSG lead IP Interconnection of more than 99.99% on of (PENS Steering Group), Network). reached only with this Existing IP 2) the A6 lead, 3) and in  Italy and Austria mean of Networks) the frame of Eurocontrol are interconnected communication Centralized Service #8. by means of IP Therefore, unless the routing over NewPENS CPA, under SETINET. This the lead of Eurocontrol, service is named will be solving those SETINET IP. issues, such an  Others European international IP network centralized (or is of paramount meshed) services, importance. such as NMOC  FABEC IP (formerly CFMU, interconnection network since 2012), EAD (FABIEN), fully (tested, operational from 2Q implementation 2011, is used for FMTP planned 1- with DFS, DSNA and 2Q20145) and MUAC. This solution, as AMHS (since the most reliable 2Q2014) are FABEC inter-connection connected by mean for the period means of PENS. 2012-2018, might be confirmed for all services or applications for which the PENS 1 is not sufficiently safe, provided SETInet capacity is extended (SETINET 2).  SETINET IP network, for FMTP only at this stage is operational since 4Q 2014 with ENAV and in production since 2Q 2014 with Austrocontrol.  Objectives: to provide secure, safe and

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 45 Released Issue Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities reliable IP network services for operational purpose between the mentioned organisations. SJU SESAR WP Scope : Skyguide (as 13,2.3  To move from an associate partner Dynamic ATFCM activity of DFS) Demand based on CTOT to Capacity an operational Balancing Collaborative Network activity addressing Target Time of Arrival (TTA)  To capitalise on existing evolutions (projects, roles) to achieve short-term results (initial hooks)  To provide solutions to improve the operational performance of the Network  Perform live trials SJU SESAR WP 2010-2016 Scope : Skyguide (as 16.6.5  Ensure that Human associate partner Human Performance is of DFS) Performance considered and Support and managed in a Coordination timely, consistent, Function and comprehensive manner  Ensure that Human Performance, Safety and Security transversal areas are working in very close collaboration

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 46 Released Issue Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities to increase synergy of their approaches SJU SESAR WP 2010-2016 Scope : Skyguide (as 4.2 :  Detailed associate partner Consolidatio operational of DSNA) n of concepts (DOD – operational OSED) concept definition  Validation strategy and for concepts validation  Validation including exercises operating  Consolidated mode and reports air-ground task sharing SJU SESAR WP 2010-2016 Scope : Skyguide (as 4.3 :  Validation associate partner Integrated platforms (En of DSNA) and pre- Route & TMA) operational validation &  Step 1 – cross- Operational validation Evaluation of Erato  Step 2 – IOP (Coflight IBP)  Step 3 - i4D Business Trajectory SJU SESAR WP 2010-2013 Scope : Skyguide (as 10.2.5 :  IOP ICD validation associate partner Flight Object of DSNA) IOP System  IOP – Coflight / Requirement Itec platform and exercises Validation SJU SESAR WP 2010-2016 Scope : Skyguide (as C2  Master Plan associate partner Management of DSNA)  Performance Planning  Reporting

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 47 Released Issue Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities

SJU SESAR WP 2010-2016 Scope : Skyguide (as B4.4 :  Develop the associate partner Workstation, service model of DSNA) Service aspects related to Interface CWP services, with Definition the aim to demonstrate the technical feasibility of using open interfaces for the workstation by using a representative subset of services Consortium : SESAR LSD Free Route Demonstration 2015-2016 PCP, Scope : PCP AF3 & AF4 activities covering several ENAV, DSNA, Free AOM-  Live trials DFS, MATSA, live trials : 0403-A, Solutions  Simulations Skyguide, City Pairs AOM- Eurocontrol, Air Long directs 0501, France, Alitalia, Free Route Areas AOM- Lufthansa, Ryanair Advanced FUA 0502

Consortium : SESAR LSD Evaluate through in-flight 2015-2016 PCP, Scope : PCP AF1, AF4 & AF6 trials the benefits of several DSNA, Skyguide, iStream DCB-  Live trials Eurocontrol, Air concepts on the flight 0204, France, Swiss, efficiency, validate the DCB- Lufthansa, ADP, capability of on-board and 0205, Zürich Airport ground systems DCB- 0206, DCB- 0306-B, DCB- 0308 Consortium : SESAR LSD Evaluate Cross-Border 2015-2016 PCP Scope : PCP AF1 & AF3 Descent Operations starting AF1 & 3 DFS, DSNA, ODP  Live trials Skyguide, from (ideally) Cruising Level AOM- towards selected airports Austrocontrol 0702 and involving consortium Eurocontrol, Air ACCs France, Lufthansa, Swiss Consortium : SESAR LSD Evaluate augmented 2015-2016 AO- Scope : approach procedures for 0505, Airbus, ANS CR,  Live trials (Zurich

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 48 Released Issue Organisations Name Code Description Implementation EATM Status Performance Cooperation Planning Links Contribution3 Activities Dassault Aviation, AAL business aviation AOM- airport) DFS, DLR, DSNA, 0701, EBAA, Elbit AUO- Systems, 0404, Fraport, IS-0201 Honeywell, Lufthansa, Skyguide, SWISS, Zurich Airport. Consortium : SESAR LSD Implementation and analysis 2015-2016 AOM- Scope : of a set of demonstrations 0604, IDS S.p.A, PROuD  Live trials addressing PBN procedures Rega, AOM- Switzerland for helicopter flights 0605 Norsk Luftambulance, Skyguide, Deep Blue

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 49 Released Issue Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

6.1 Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’: o A colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o Another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date REG APO. Progress (**) REG high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) APO Impl. Date ASP ASP. Progress (**) ASP high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) ASP Impl. Date MIL MIL. Progress (**) MIL high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) MIL Impl. Date APO APO. Progress (**) APO high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 50 Released Issue 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

AOM13.1 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 AAMS‐10a(EN), AIMS‐19b(EN), AOM‐0301(OI) ‐ Harmonization of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling is completed 31/12/2013 REG (By:12/2018) Completed FOCA ‐ ‐ 31/12/2011 Approved OAT procedures are in place within the national ATM Manual as Completed REMIL ‐ well as in the operation manual of the air force. 31/12/2011 ASP (By:12/2018) Completed Swiss Air Force ‐ ‐ 31/12/2013 Completed Skyguide OAT interface exists with France, Germany and Austria. ‐ 31/12/2013 MIL (By:12/2018) ASP actions by integrated civil‐military provider Skyguide ‐ see Completed FOCA ‐ corresponding ASP SLoA 31/12/2013 Completed REMIL ‐ ‐ 31/12/2013 Completed Swiss Air Force ‐ ‐ 31/12/2013

Implement Advanced Airspace Management Timescales: Partly AOM19 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AAMS‐11(EN), AOM‐0201(OI), AOM‐0202(OI), AOM‐0205(OI), AOM‐0401(OI), DCB‐0203(OI) ‐ FUA implementation is in good progress within Switzerland where Skyguide is an integrated civil‐military 31/03/2016 ANSP. ASP (By:12/2016) FABEC Partly Skyguide Most of the SloAs are already completed or partially completed. ATFCM/ASM Completed Project 31/12/2016

Implementation of Direct Routing Timescales: [PCP] Partly AOM21.1 Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 [Essential] Completed Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 AOM‐0401(OI), AOM‐0402(OI), AOM‐0500(OI) [E] ‐ A first network was implemented in Q4 2015 and further improvements are scheduled in 2016 and 2017 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2017) Partly A first network was implemented in Q4 2015 and further improvements Skyguide ‐ Completed are scheduled in 2016 and 2017 31/12/2017

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 51 Released Issue

Implement Free Route Airspace Timescales: [PCP] AOM21.2 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 [Essential] Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 AOM‐0401(OI), AOM‐0402(OI), AOM‐0501(OI) [E], AOM‐0502(OI) [E], CM‐0102‐A(OI) [E] ‐ FABEC FRA project has been launched 31/12/2019 ASP (By:12/2021) Free Route Planned Skyguide FABEC FRA phase 2 is starting Airspace 31/12/2019

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Timescales: Partly AOP03 Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 AO‐0101(OI) ‐ Runway Safety Teams have been established at all Aerodromes handling IFR Traffic 31/12/2013 REG (By:12/2013) Runway Safety Teams have been established at Zurich and Geneva. Completed Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with FOCA Annex 14 has been completed as far as practicable for the concerned ‐ ‐ airports. Recommendations contained in the European Action plan have been put into place. ASP (By:12/2013) Partly Skyguide Full completion of actions by Skyguide is in progress ‐ Completed 31/12/2013 APO (By:12/2013) Geneva Airport: First certification granted by FOCA in 02/2007. Completed Recertification in accordance with ICAO has been carried out by FOCA in GA ‐ Geneva December 2010 and valid for 3 years. Safety Management System ‐ Airport implemented. 28/02/2007 Zurich Airport: Fully completed. First certification granted by FOCA in 2005. Re‐certified in 09/2006 and 10/2007 by FOCA. FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed ‐ ‐ Airport 28/02/2007

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

AOP04.1 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 AO‐0201(OI), CTE‐S02b(EN), CTE‐S03b(EN), CTE‐S04b(EN) LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Geneva Airport. 30/06/2004 REG (By:12/2010) Eurocontrol A‐SMGCS Level 1 Requirements directly applicable according Completed FOCA to Article 3 of the Federal Ordinance on Air Navigation Services (letter ‐ no ‐ ‐ objection to implementation ‐ of A‐SMGCS Level 1 in 2004). ASP (By:12/2011) Completed Skyguide All Skyguide actions are completed ‐ ‐ APO (By:12/2010) GA ‐ Geneva Completed A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Geneva airport. ‐ Airport 30/06/2004

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 52 Released Issue Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

AOP04.1 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 AO‐0201(OI), CTE‐S02b(EN), CTE‐S03b(EN), CTE‐S04b(EN) LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Zurich Airport. 30/06/2004 REG (By:12/2010) Eurocontrol A‐SMGCS Level 1 Requirements directly applicable according Completed FOCA to Article 3 of the Federal Ordinance on Air Navigation Services (letter ‐ no ‐ ‐ objection to implementation ‐ of A‐SMGCS Level 1 in 2004). ASP (By:12/2011) Completed Skyguide All actions by Skyguide are completed ‐ ‐ APO (By:12/2010) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Zurich Airport. ‐ Airport 30/06/2004

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

AOP04.2 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 AO‐0102(OI), AO‐0201(OI), CTE‐S02b(EN), CTE‐S03b(EN), CTE‐S04b(EN) LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport A‐SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Geneva airport 31/12/2009 ASP (By:12/2017) Completed Skyguide All actions by Skyguide are completed ‐ ‐ APO (By:12/2017) GA ‐ Geneva Completed A‐SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Geneva airport ‐ Airport 31/12/2009

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

AOP04.2 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 AO‐0102(OI), AO‐0201(OI), CTE‐S02b(EN), CTE‐S03b(EN), CTE‐S04b(EN) LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport A‐SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Zurich airport 30/04/2011 ASP (By:12/2017) Completed Skyguide All actions by Skyguide are completed ‐ 31/05/2010 APO (By:12/2017) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed A‐SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Zurich airport ‐ Airport 31/05/2010

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 53 Released Issue

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: Partly AOP05 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AO‐0501(OI), AO‐0601(OI), AO‐0602(OI), AO‐0603(OI) LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport The Genève Aéroport‐Skyguide project 'A‐CDM' is partially completed (extended live trials ‐ connection to 31/03/2016 NMOC since 12/2015) and planned to be fully completed by the 31/03/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) The GA‐Skyguide project 'A‐CDM' is on‐going and is planned to be Completed Skyguide ‐ completed by 31/03/2016. Skyguide actions are completed. 31/12/2015 APO (By:12/2016) First step of CDM implementation achieved in 2006 (local data exchanges). Partly GA ‐ Geneva The Genève Aéroport‐Skyguide project 'A‐CDM' is partly completed Completed ‐ Airport (extended live trials ‐ connection to NMOC since 12/2015) and planned to 31/03/2016 be fully completed in Q2/2016

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: AOP05 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AO‐0501(OI), AO‐0601(OI), AO‐0602(OI), AO‐0603(OI) LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Zurich Airport: Airport CDM Applications Level 1 to 3 implemented and audited by EUROCONTROL CDM‐ 31/05/2013 Team. ASP (By:12/2016) Completed Skyguide The A‐CDM project in Zurich is completed ‐ 31/05/2013 APO (By:12/2016) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed Zurich Airport: Airport CDM Applications Level 1,2 and 3 implemented. ‐ Airport 30/09/2013

Time Based Separation Timescales: [PCP] AOP10 No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 [Essential] Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 AO‐0303(OI) [E] LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Functionality still in development phase. ‐ REG (By:12/2023) No Plan FOCA TBS operations procedures will be published when defined ‐ ‐ ASP (By:12/2023) No Plan Skyguide Functionality still in development phase. ‐ ‐

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 54 Released Issue

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: [PCP] Partly AOP11 Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 [Essential] Completed Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 AO‐0801‐A(OI) [E] LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport Capacity information are made availableby Skyguide for future processing by Geneva Airport ‐ ASP (By:12/2021) Occupancy tool CRYTSAL sends all information about traffic volume, sector Completed Skyguide capacities, restrictions or decrease of capacity via B2B services to ECTL ‐ ‐ NMOC in real time. APO (By:12/2021) A task force is created to come with a creation and implementation plan in Planned GA ‐ Geneva order to be fully operational latest 2021. ‐ Airport Through CDM, CEM, and other projects, stakeholders in Geneva already 31/12/2021 cooperate.

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: [PCP] Partly AOP11 Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 [Essential] Completed Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 AO‐0801‐A(OI) [E] LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Capacity information are made available and A‐CDM processes partly answer the requirements ‐ ASP (By:12/2021) Occupancy tool CRYTSAL sends all information about traffic volume, sector Completed Skyguide capacities, restrictions or decrease of capacity via B2B services to ECTL ‐ ‐ NMOC in real time. APO (By:12/2021) All following AOP Req. for Airports will be implemented once the OFA Partly FZAG ‐ Zurich 05.01.01 OSED is approved and realeased for deployment (APOC Completed ‐ Airport infrastructure of Zurich Airport and the so far implemented A‐CDM ‐ processes are already alligned to majority of the Req.).

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 55 Released Issue

Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring [PCP] AOP12 Timescales: Planned [Essential] Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 AERODROME‐ATC‐36(EN), AO‐0104‐A(OI) [E] LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Currently, ZRH TWR ATCO clearances and instructions are not systematically traced in the e‐strip and A‐ SMGCS equipment. Furthermore clearances and instructions which are already entered into the different equipment are recorded afterwards. The Advanced Runway Safety Improvement (ARSI) project aims at changing the working methods and procedures to systemically trace controller actions to record the clearances and instructions to get knowledge of the controllers intentions. Moreover this requires a more and deeper coupled e‐strip and A‐ SMGCS systems as it is the case today in order to improve the situational awareness within the TWR and APRON rooms as well as to provide alerts/warnings in case of safety critical / contradictory ATC clearances. A special focus has to be paid to the crossing runways in terms of take‐offs and landings in their different 31/12/2018 configurations. This new capability to alert of potentially critical situations is to be realized through the integration between the existing skyguide TWR A‐SMGCS (SAMAX), TWR/APP e‐strip and coordination tool (TRACE), FZAG airport e‐strip and DMAN (DARTS) and SMAN (to come). This should contribute to a first step towards the complete integration of the automation support tools provided by the ANSP for TWR control and those managing the airport situation. In addition, this new capability will be put in the latter into relation with the up‐to‐come new FZAG AGL (Air Ground Lighting) system to interact in a more advanced way with it using the new capabilities developed in ARSI to pave the foundations for inititiatives like PIVIS or follow‐the‐green. ASP (By:12/2020) Planned Skyguide Planned with ARSI project deployment ‐ 31/12/2018 APO (By:12/2020) FZAG ‐ Zurich Missing Data ‐ ‐ Airport ‐

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2

ATC02.5 Timescales: Planned

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 CM‐0801(OI) ‐ Ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2 implementation is now planned but will be late 31/12/2018 (i.e.:CfO after 31/12/2016). ASP (By:12/2016) Planned Skyguide APW L2 Swiss‐wide implementation is planned/budgeted in 2017‐18 ‐ 31/12/2018

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2

ATC02.6 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 CM‐0801(OI) ‐ Ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2 is implemented in ZRH and GVA ‐ ASP (By:12/2016) Completed Skyguide Skyguide has implemented MSAW in its ZRH and GVA APPs and TWRs ‐ ‐

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 56 Released Issue

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2

ATC02.7 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 CM‐0801(OI) ‐ Ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 is implemented in ZRH and GVA ‐ ASP (By:12/2016) Completed Skyguide Skyguide has implemented APM in its ZRH and GVA APPs and TWRs ‐ ‐

Implement AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 TS‐0102(OI) LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport An Arrival management tool i sconsidered for GVA 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2015) Extended Late Skyguide Initial studies for AMAN implementation at Geneva have been launched. Arrival 31/12/2018 Management

Implement AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 TS‐0102(OI) LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Completed in ZRH (CALM system) ‐ ASP (By:12/2015) Extended Completed Skyguide An Arrival management tool is implemented in ZRH (CALM) Arrival ‐ Management

Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Partly ATC12.1 Timescales: Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 CM‐0202(OI), CM‐0203(OI), CM‐0205(OI), CM‐0207‐A(OI) ‐ Implementation of Support tools for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring is partly completed and should be completed in 2016 through the deployment of the stripless 31/12/2021 (VC) project. ASP (By:12/2021) Skyguide has implemented an automated support for conflict detection, in Partly both ZRH and GVA ACCs as part of its stripless (VC tranche 1) project. The Completed Skyguide ‐ skyguide philosophy is to not provide ATCOs with support tools for 31/12/2021 resolution of the conflicts, expect for conflicts over XPT (ECAT)

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 57 Released Issue

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Partly ATC15 Timescales: Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 TS‐0305(OI) ‐ 1/ AMAN tools and, exchange mechanisms and corresponding procedures have been established in Switzerland for years. Time To Lose (TTL) information is provided in LSZH operational environment (APP and corresponding upper sectors) 2/ An XMAN implementation project is on‐going which will allow an extension of the ER operational 31/01/2017 coordination with adjacent centers 3/ The deployment of an AMAN in LSGG operational environment is under study (decision Q2 2016) Changes to the existing framework will be treated according to standard oversight procedures (EC REG 1034/2011). ASP (By:12/2017) The introduction of electronic coordination via the Stripless system Partly implemented in Zurich ACC and in Geneva ACC will allow exchange of basic Extended Completed Skyguide AMAN data with Swiss airports (Zurich and Geneva (if AMAN equipped) Arrival and with airports equipped with AMAN in the vicinity of Skyguide area of Management 31/01/2017 responsibility.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 58 Released Issue

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Partly ATC16 Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 PRO‐AC‐21(EN) ‐ The objective is implemented but the SloA ATC16‐ASP02 that cannot be complied with 31/12/2015 REG (By:12/2015) Completed FOCA Regulatory provisions are implemented. ‐ 31/12/2015 ASP (By:03/2012) Objective ATC16‐ASP02 cannot be complied with because: No Plan

1. The regulatory framework addresses a phase‐in implementation of TCAS II v.7.1, starting with forward fitting as of 01 March 2012, and ending with retrofitting 01 December 2015. Hence, at least by the end of 2015, there will be mixed aircraft population operating in Europe, in terms of TCAS II version equipage. On the other hand, ANSP has no way of knowing which version of TCAS II an aircraft is equipped with, since these data are not provided through a FPL, and hence no appropriate mechanism for monitoring performance of TCAS II v.7.1 can be established.

2. Finish date of the ATC16‐ASP02 objective coincides with the start date of the objective ATC16‐REG02 (Provide airworthiness certification). Hence, ANSPs are expected to establish a monitoring mechanism for a piece of equipment that still hasn't been certified, i.e. before any such piece of equipment can be found airborne. On the other hand, for a requirement of such kind, as a minimum testing, operational evaluation and transition Skyguide ‐ periods have to be defined. ‐

In addition to the above, it should be noted that:

‐ the ICAO provision the ATC16‐ASP02 is based upon is a recommendation, published in a PANS document, for which the ICAO Member States do not have to declare differences with. In addition, when developed, this provision was intended for fundamentally different purpose which does not include monitoring of difference in behaviour of the two different TCAS models. That need is already responded to through the established reporting mechanism ‐ see below.

‐ for the ECAC region, the ACAS monitoring function is part of the European Safety Programme (ESP) Field 2 (incident reporting and data collection), which is, in turn, developed in response to the Safety Data Reporting and Data Flow Task Force (SAFREP)‐s Recommendation No. 7 ‐to bring rationalisation in European ATM safety data collation and analysis‐..‐. MIL (By:12/2015) Completed Swiss Air Force ‐ ‐ 31/01/2015

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 59 Released Issue

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

ATC17 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 CM‐0201(OI) ‐ Skyguide ATC system was upgraded to support the Basic procedure. The electronic dialogue in co‐ordination prior to the transfer of flights from one ATC unit to the next as well as well as the transfer of communication from one ATC unit to the next ATC unit of such flights using OLDI (SYSCO) messages is not planned. ‐

Since it is up to the individual ANSP to decide which messages, if any, to implement, the status is set to 'completed' even if there is currently no plan to implement ASP03, ASP04 and ASP05. ASP (By:12/2018) Inter‐sector coordination is already implemented in Geneva ACC and inter‐ Completed centre coordination process has been tested in live trials between Geneva Skyguide and Zurich (SYSCO live trials). The deployment of the latter, initially ‐ ‐ envisaged in the frame of the Virtual Center Programme was de‐scoped in 2015 and is currently not planned.

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Partly COM10 Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 CTE‐C06c(EN) ‐ Migrate from AFTN (Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network) to AMHS (ATS Message Handling 31/12/2015 System) is on‐going ASP (By:12/2014) The Skyguide project "MESANGE" to renew the AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS system Partly as well as the upgrade of existing COM Center CH to provide AMHS Completed capability were completed in 2010. The system is connected to the network and links to other centers are progressively cleared for operation. Skyguide Skyguide will launch in January 2016 the project "AMS‐CH HW/SW ‐ Renewal", for updating the current AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS system, including 31/12/2017 the acquisition of the latest elements for supporting fully the Extended ATSMHS. The target date for the commissioning of these elements is 2Q/2017.

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM Timescales: COM11 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 CTE‐C05a(EN) ‐ Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) implementation is ongoing. 31/12/2020 ASP (By:12/2020) A project "FlexSecto CH VISTA/EMTEL" has been launched to migrate Planned current VCS having access to the ATS network on ATM VoIP. Skyguide A project "SmartRadio" has been launched to install ATM VoIP compatible ‐ 31/12/2020 radios in around 40 radio stations throughout Switzerland. At the network level, studies are still going on.

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 60 Released Issue

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Partly ENV01 Timescales: Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 AOM‐0701(OI) LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport Planned within the CHIPS program. This program is coordinating PBN activities between stakeholders (Skyguide, ZRH and GVA APOs, Based Airlines, MIL and FOCA). Today, basic CDA is applied (BCDA). 31/12/2016 Genève Aéroport supports the CDO initiatives driven by skyguide. ASP (By:12/2013) Development of CD Operations based on RNAV1 transitions planned within Partly the CHIPS program. This program is coordinating activities between CH Completed stakeholders. Skyguide Skyguide is active with ECTL CDA WG to define what is a CDO that can be CHIPS implemented in the CH environment 31/12/2016 The SESAR Optimised Descent Profiles project is on‐going to validate the concept. APO (By:12/2013) Planned within the CHIPS program. This program is coordinating PBN Partly activities between stakeholders (Skyguide, ZRH and GVA APOs, Based Completed Airlines, MIL and FOCA). Today, basic CDA is applied. GA ‐ Geneva Genève Aéroport supports the CDO initiatives driven by skyguide. CHIPS Airport 31/12/2017 Geneva Airport, will take a more proactive role to promote CDO (CDA) & CCO. A clarification of definition is currently in progress.

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Partly ENV01 Timescales: Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 AOM‐0701(OI) LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Today, basic CDA is applied (BCDA). The CDO on P‐RNAV Transitions' is suspended until the implementation 31/12/2016 of the lateral P‐RNAV Transitions. ASP (By:12/2013) BCDAs are in operation. Development of CD Operations based on RNAV1 is Partly planned within the CHIPS program. In 2014, the transition Zurich should be Completed Skyguide finally implemented followed by the optimisation toward a PBN CDO. CHIPS The SESAR Optimised Descent Profiles project is on‐going to validate the 31/12/2016 concept. APO (By:12/2013) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed Today, basic CDA is applied (BCDA). CHIPS Airport 31/12/2013

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 61 Released Issue

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports Partly ENV02 Timescales: Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AO‐0703(OI), AO‐0705(OI), AO‐0706(OI) LSGG ‐ Geneva Airport Collaborative Environmental Management is almost completed. The mitigation of the pollution due to deicing activities is being finalised for the area near the runway 31/12/2017 holding point (mitigation on stands is completed). ASP (By:12/2016) Completed Skyguide Skyguide participates in the consultative groups ‐ ‐ APO (By:12/2016) Geneva Airport has, since 1994, established a consultative group Partly comprised of Aircraft Operators, the Airport and local Authorities and Completed GA ‐ Geneva Skyguide, to monitor and act against aircraft noise. ‐ Airport The mitigation of the pollution due to de icing activities is being finalised 31/12/2017 for the area near the runway holding point (mitigation on stands is completed).

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

ENV02 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AO‐0703(OI), AO‐0705(OI), AO‐0706(OI) LSZH ‐ Zürich Airport Collaborative Environmental Management is completed. 30/06/2015 ASP (By:12/2016) Completed Skyguide Skyguide participates in the consultative groups ‐ ‐ APO (By:12/2016) Both Geneva and Zurich Airports have, since 1994 and 2000 respectively, Completed established consultative groups comprised of acft operators, the airport FZAG ‐ Zurich and local authorities and Skyguide to monitor and act against aircraft ‐ Airport noise. 30/06/2015

Zurich: Collaborative Environmental Management is completed.

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Partly FCM01 Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 IS‐0102(OI) ‐ Enhanced tactical flow management services are mostly implemented or planned 31/12/2012 ASP (By:07/2014) Objective partially completed: Partly ‐ CPRs are sent to the CFMU. Skyguide is using ASTERIX CAT 242. There is Completed no translation to CAT 62 foreseen. Skyguide ‐ ‐ FSAs are sent to the CFMU. There is no plan to sent FSAs to the CFMU for 31/12/2012 route changes or for holding flights. ‐ DPIs are sent to the CFMU in ZRH and planned to be sent in GVA

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 62 Released Issue

Implement collaborative flight planning Timescales: FCM03 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 IS‐0102(OI) ‐ Enhanced tactical flow management services are implemented. ‐ ASP (By:12/2017) Both ACCs provide flight plan messaging in ADEXP‐format and process APL Completed Skyguide ‐ and ACH messages. ‐

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1 Timescales: Partly FCM04 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 DCB‐0205(OI) ‐ A local tool, Crystal has been developed (in house) and is used to perform STAM Phase 1 En‐Route. ‐ Integration to the CHMI is awaited from the NM. ASP (By:12/2015) Partly A local tool, Crystal has been developed (in house) and is used to perform Skyguide ‐ Completed STAM Phase 1 En‐Route. Integration to the CHMI is awaited from the NM. ‐

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Timescales: [PCP] Partly FCM05 Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 [Essential] Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 AOM‐0202(OI), AOM‐0205(OI), DCB‐0102(OI), DCB‐0103‐A(OI) [E], IS‐0901‐A(OI) [E] ‐ Trial phase is on‐going with the NM using the LARA tool. ‐ ASP (By:12/2017) Partly Skyguide Trial phase is on‐going with the NM using the LARA tool. ‐ Completed ‐ APO (By:12/2021) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed ‐ ‐ Airport 31/12/2012 Airport slots are exchanged with Slot Coordination Switzerland, which Completed GA ‐ Geneva provides the information to NM via the EUACA database (MoC with ‐ Airport 31/12/2012 Eurocontrol).

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: [PCP] Partly FCM06 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 [Essential] Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 CM‐0101(OI), CM‐0103‐A(OI) [E], IS‐0102(OI) ‐ Traffic Complexity Assessment is Partly Completed ‐ ASP (By:12/2021) Partly Skyguide ‐ ‐ Completed ‐

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 63 Released Issue

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: INF04 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 IS‐0201(OI) ‐ The Integrated briefing function is implemented ‐ ASP (By:12/2012) Replacement of the current Swiss self‐briefing system "AMIE / AIS‐MET Completed Information Environment" meeting integration level 4 by an Integrated Briefing solution in co‐operation with Austro Control will fully meet Skyguide integration level 5. CfO (Clearance for Operation) for the new Swiss ‐ ‐ Integrated Briefing and rollout to 66 Swiss locations was completed in 08/2006. Clearance for Operation CfO was received from FOCA in 12/2006.

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Timescales: INF07 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 AIMS‐16(EN) ‐ Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) actions are in progress. 31/05/2018 REG (By:05/2018) The national TOD policy and concept are established and the Planned FOCA implementation program is launched. Oversight activities will take place eTOD CH 31/05/2018 aligned with the implementation programme. ASP (By:05/2018) A data collection services feasibiity study (incl. TOD) has been conducted Planned addressing the implementation schedule, the risks, the costs and the Skyguide eTOD CH operational and technical feasibility based on a best practice approach of 31/05/2018 another ANSP. APO (By:05/2018) GA ‐ Geneva Geneva Airport will comply with FOCA requirements on this subject. TOD Planned ‐ Airport will be stepwise implemented together with ADQ implementation. 31/05/2018 FZAG ‐ Zurich Zurich Airport will comply with FOCA requirements on this subject. TOD Planned ‐ Airport will be stepwise implemented together with ADQ implementation. 31/05/2018

Aircraft identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011

ITY‐ACID System capability: 02/01/2020 Completed

Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025 GSURV‐0101(EN) ‐ All objectives are met since November 2011 30/11/2011 ASP (By:01/2020) All objectives are met since November 2011. However, full capability (flight Completed plans / radar tracks correlation based on ACID for 100% of the a/c) is not reached. ‐ Not the whole CH FIR is declared Mode‐S to the NMOC. The Mode‐S radar Skyguide coverage over South of the Alps was an issue until the 28th of October ‐ 30/11/2011 2014 and the integration of the Italian Mode‐S data into skyguide MRTS. Declaration of full CH FIR coverage will be done until the 5th of January 2015 ‐ The code 1000 can't be allocated in case of SSR code change

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 64 Released Issue Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented ITY‐ADQ Planned by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 IS‐0202(OI), IS‐0204(OI) ‐ An overall Implementation concept has been finalized. A detailed national Implementation Concept is 30/06/2019 available. Implementation of ADQ has been launched. REG (By:06/2017) An overall Implementation concept has been established and is approved Planned FOCA ‐ for implementation. Implementation has been launched. 30/06/2019 ASP (By:06/2017) Within the national implementation plan (responsibility of State) an ASP ADMS/ADQ Planned implementation programme called Aeronautical Data Management Implementatio Skyguide Services (ADMS) has been established and the implementation is in n / AIM Expert 30/06/2017 progress. Task Force APO (By:06/2017) GA ‐ Geneva Geneva Airport will comply with the implementation plan being finalised Planned ‐ Airport by the state 30/06/2019 FZAG ‐ Zurich Zurich Airport will comply with the implementation plan being finalised by Planned ‐ Airport the state 31/12/2019

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 Timescales: ITY‐AGDL Completed ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 AUO‐0301(OI), CTE‐C02b(EN) ‐ The AGDL CPDLC is in operation in both Geneva and Zurich ACC (above FL245) since end 2012 (Geneva) and 28/02/2013 beginning 2013 (Zurich). REG (By:02/2018) The EC Reg 29/2009 has been accepted by the joint committee CH‐EU and Completed FOCA ‐ is therefore applicable to Skyguide. 28/02/2013 ASP (By:02/2018) The AGDL CPDLC is in operation in both Geneva and Zurich ACC (above Completed Skyguide VC Programme FL245) since end 2012 (Geneva) and beginning 2013 (Zurich). 28/02/2013 MIL (By:01/2019) Planned Swiss Air Force Adaptation of existing fleet (5 a/c) is partially planned ‐ 31/12/2018

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 65 Released Issue

Implement 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014

ITY‐AGVCS2 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 Planned

All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 CTE‐C01a(EN) ‐ All Swiss frequency assignments will be converted to 8,33 kHz. Exceptions will be published accordingly 31/12/2018 within the corresponding time frame REG (By:12/2018) All Swiss frequency assignments will be converted to 8,33 kHz. Exceptions Planned FOCA ‐ will be published accordingly within the corresponding time frame. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) The SmartRadio Project will make most of the infrastructure ready by end Planned Skyguide ‐ 2018. 31/12/2018 MIL (By:12/2020) Planned Swiss Air Force Implementation for State a/c is planned ‐ 31/12/2018 APO (By:12/2018) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed ‐ ‐ Airport 28/02/2014 Partly GA ‐ Geneva Impacts on APOs are reduced ‐ Completed Airport 31/12/2018

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 ITY‐COTR Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018 CM‐0201(OI) ‐ Ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes are implemented. 28/02/2013 ASP (By:02/2018) Completed Skyguide Ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes are implemented. ‐ 28/02/2013 MIL (By:12/2012) Ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes are implemented. Completed Skyguide Logon Forwarding (LOF) and Next Authority Notified (NAN), supporting ‐ 31/12/2012 data link service are linked to ITY‐AGDL

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 66 Released Issue Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITY‐FMTP Completed All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 CTE‐C06(EN) ‐ Deployment of the FMTP is completed 27/01/2015 ASP (By:12/2014) First regional trans‐border IP network is being deployed for FMTP in the Completed frame of the FABEC and BLUE MED. The first network with the DFS was CfO 2011, a second with the DSNA has followed in 2014. Last implementation Skyguide with DSNA was successfully tested in 2014 and was performed in January ‐ 27/01/2015 2015. The interconnection with ENAV has been perfomed in June 2012 and in Sept. 2012 between DFS and ENAV. Existing TDM infrastructure will be used for IP network transport. MIL (By:12/2014) ASP action by integrated civil‐military provider Skyguide. TCP/IP is Completed Swiss Air Force ‐ implemented between CIV and MIL ATC units. 31/12/2014

Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 Partly ITY‐SPI New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 Completed ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 GSURV‐0101(EN) ‐ Surveillance performance and interoperability requirements are implemented or planned to be 31/12/2017 implemented REG (By:02/2015) EC 1207/2011 entered into force in Switzerland in February 2013. An audit Completed FOCA ‐ for compliance verification has taken place. 30/09/2013 ASP (By:02/2015) Operational Completed Surveillance performance and interoperability requirements are Deployment of Skyguide implemented SSR Mode S / 31/12/2015 VC Programme MIL (By:06/2020) Carriage and operation of Mode S Elementary or enhanced Surveillance Planned Swiss Air Force ‐ avionics is planned to be implemented 31/03/2014

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 67 Released Issue

Implementation of P‐RNAV Timescales: NAV03 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 AOM‐0601(OI), AOM‐0602(OI), CTE‐N08(EN) ‐ P‐RNAV procedures are implemented according to local needs. 31/12/2010 ASP (By:12/2023) Implementation of P‐RNAV procedures is enabled in Switzerland and can Completed be developed in accordance with local requirements (users capabilities, airspace, OPS concept, etc). Skyguide CHIPS P‐RNAV procedures in St Gallen was implemented in 2010. 31/12/2010 RNAV 1 (P‐RNAV) procedures will be published on MIL sites where applicable

Implement APV procedures Timescales: Partly NAV10 Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 AOM‐0602(OI), AOM‐0604(OI), CTE‐N06a(EN), CTE‐N06b(EN) ‐ First Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance have been implemented. 31/12/2016 REG (By:04/2016) In the framework of the Swiss‐wide implementation of SESAR‐related Completed FOCA objectives (CHIPS) performance‐based navigation (PBN) is addressed. The CHIPS ‐ CHIPS‐Program includes a number of APVs. ASP (By:12/2016) Partly Skyguide Planned with ongoing projects within the CHIPS program CHIPS Completed 31/12/2016

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

SAF10 Timescales: Completed

Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 CM‐0801(OI) ‐ A working group in conjunction between the regulator and the ANSP is existing and several actions have 31/12/2011 been implemented already. REG (By:12/2011) An Airspace infringement working group (AIWG) is established for Completed analysing of data and solution finding. A detailed national plan for the FOCA ‐ implementation of the recommendations and proposed actions of the 31/12/2011 European Action Plan is established. ASP (By:12/2011) A working group in conjunction between the regulator and the ANSP exists Completed Skyguide and first measures have been taken already (awareness campaigns, etc.), ‐ 31/12/2011 active participation to Eurocontrol Action Plan has also been assured. MIL (By:12/2011)

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 68 Released Issue

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: SAF11 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 PRO‐006a(EN) ‐ All the actions are implemented. 31/12/2015 REG (By:01/2018) Completed FOCA The necessary actions have been taken. ‐ 31/03/2013 ASP (By:12/2014) Completed Skyguide All the actions are implemented. ‐ 31/12/2015 APO (By:12/2014) FZAG ‐ Zurich Completed ZRH: The necessary actions have been taken. ‐ Airport 31/12/2014 GA ‐ Geneva Completed ‐ ‐ Airport 31/12/2014

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 69 Released Issue 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 70 Released Issue

Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Point for Switzerland Skyguide Thierry BREGOU

LSSIP Focal Point for REG FOCA Fiona LOMBARDI

LSSIP Focal Point for ASP Skyguide Thierry BREGOU LSSIP Focal Point for APO ZRH FZAG Mattes KETTNER LSSIP Focal Point for APO GVA Genève Aéroport Pauli IMMONEN LSSIP Focal Point for MIL SAF Tamara HABICH

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Switzerland DPS/PEPR Adriatik KOKONA

ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL National Stakeholder Specialist(s) Objective PEPR Objective Coordinator AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. A. DYBOWSKA M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER A. MAUBACH (Skyguide)

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA O. KRAUSE (Skyguide) AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA D.NOVAKOVIC (Skyguide) AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA D.NOVAKOVIC (Skyguide) AOP03 P. VRANJKOVIC M. MENDOZA (Skyguide) T. LICU M. KETTNER (FZAG) T. MELLINA (Genève Aéroport) AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC M. MENDOZA (Skyguide) P. ADAMSON M. KETTNER (FZAG) T. MELLINA (Genève Aéroport)

AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC E. MARFURT (Skyguide) P. ADAMSON M. KETTNER (FZAG) T. MELLINA (Genève Aéroport)

AOP05 P. VRANJKOVIC E. MARFURT (Skyguide) M. KETTNER (FZAG) P. ADAMSON F. DURET (Genève Aéroport) G. SANCEY (Genève Aéroport) AOP10 B. HILL S. OBERTI (FOCA) M. BIRENHEIDE E. MARFURT(Skyguide) AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL E. MARFURT (Skyguide) AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC E. MARFURT (Skyguide) ATC02.5 I. FEIJT M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. ALKALAY (Skyguide)

ATC02.6 I. FEIJT M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. ALKALAY (Skyguide)

ATC02.7 I. FEIJT M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. ALKALAY (Skyguide) ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO P. LATRON (Skyguide)

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 71 Released Issue ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL National Stakeholder Specialist(s) Objective PEPR Objective Coordinator ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO I. ALKALAY (Skyguide) ATC15 L. DELL’ORTO S. Oberti, M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI D. JAVET (Skyguide) ATC16 L. DELL’ORTO D. LIECHTI (FOCA) S. DROZDOWSKI I. ALKALAY (Skyguide), S. EDER (FOCA) ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. Oberti (FOCA) S. MORTON G. Luder (skyguide) COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA J. PEREZ (Skyguide)

COM11 A. KOKONA S. OBERTI(FOCA) L. POPESCU S. MEISTER (Skyguide) ENV01 B. HILL C. DU MESGNIL D'ENGENTE (Skyguide) C. FABER M. KETTNER (FZAG) S. MEISSER (Genève Aéroport) ENV02 B. HILL C. DU MESGNIL D'ENGENTE (Skyguide) S. MAHONY, A. WATT M. KETTNER (FZAG) S:MEISSER (Genève Aéroport)

FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA E. MARFURT (Skyguide)

FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Y. COURTOIS (Skyguide) FCM04 O. CIOARA S. OBERTI (FOCA). P. HOP S. MARIETAN (Skyguide) FCM05 O. CIOARA S. OBERTI (FOCA) I. MENDES S. MARIETAN (Skyguide) FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO S. MARIETAN (Skyguide) INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO U. RICH (Skyguide)

INF07 A-P. FRANGOLHO M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) A. PETROVSKY U. RICH (Skyguide) ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA M. MENDOZA (Skyguide) ITY-ADQ A-P. FRANGOLHO M. LUGINBÜHL (FOCA) M. UNTERREINER U. RICH (Skyguide) M. KETTNER (FZAG)

ITY-AGDL A. KOKONA S. OBERTI, , M. KÜHNE(FOCA) S. DISSING P. LATRON (Skyguide) S. MEISTER (Skyguide)

ITY-AGVCS2 O. ALFARO M. KÜHNE (FOCA) J POUZET S. MEISTER (Skyguide)

ITY-COTR L. DELL’ORTO S. OBERTI (FOCA) S. MORTON G. LUDER (Skyguide)

ITY-FMTP O. ALFARO S. OBERTI (FOCA) L. POPESCU G. LUDER (Skyguide) ITY-SPI O. CIOARA S. OBERTI (FOCA) M. BORELY, R. STEWART A. MOTTA (Skyguide)

NAV03 A. KOKONA P. IMHOF (FOCA) F. PAVLICEVIC C. DU MESGNIL D'ENGENTE (Skyguide)

NAV10 A. KOKONA P. IMHOF (FOCA) R. FARNWORTH C. DU MESGNIL D'ENGENTE (Skyguide)

SAF10 I. FEIJT R. MÄUSLI (FOCA) T. LICU P. OBERSON (Skyguide) SAF11 I. FEIJT P. WALDNER, R. MÄUSLI (FOCA) S. LAWRENCE I. ROCHAT, C. DI PALMA (Skyguide) T. MELLINA (Genève Aéroport)

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 72 Released Issue Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation (31.12.2015)

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 73 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 74 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 75 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 76 Released Issue Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

ACC Area Control Centre AF ATM Functionality AGY EUROCONTROL Agency AIC Aeronautical Information Circular AIP Aeronautical Information Publication ANSP Air Navigation Services Provider AOM Airspace Organisation Management ARINC Aeronautical Radio Incorporated ASM Airspace Management ATC Air Traffic Control ATCO Air Traffic Control Officer ATFCM Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management ATIS Automatic Terminal Information Service ATM Air Traffic Management ATN Aeronautical Telecommunications Network ATS Air Traffic Services CAA Civil Aviation Authority CDM Collaborative Decision Making CFMU Central Flow Management Unit CIDIN Common ICAO Data Interchange Network CPDLC Controller Pilot Data Link Communications CTA Control Area EAD European Aeronautical Database EC European Commission/Community ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference EEC EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre (Bretigny) EGNOS European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service ESA European Space Agency EU European Union EUROCAE European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment FCM Flow and Capacity Management FDPS Flight Data Processing System FIR Flight Information Region (ICAO) FIS Flight Information Services FMP Flow Management Position FMS Flow Management System FOCA Federal Office of Civil Aviation (Switzerland) FT Fast Tracks FUA Flexible Use of Airspace FZAG Flughafen Zürich AG GAT General Air Traffic

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 77 Released Issue GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System GPS Global Positioning System IANS EUROCONTROL Institute for Air Navigation Services IATA International Air Transport Association ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation IFATCA International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers Association MET Meteorology MIL Military NAV Navigation NOTAM Notice to Airmen OAT Operational Air Traffic OLDI On Line Data Interchange PCP Pilot Common Project DP Deployment Programme RDPS Radar Data Processing System R&D Research & Development RWY Runway SAF Safety Management S-AF Sub ATM Functionality SAR Search and Rescue SARPS Standard and Recommended Practices (ICAO) SLoA Stakeholder Line of Action STATFOR Statistics and Forecast TMA Terminal Control Area UAC Upper Area Control (Centre) VFR Visual Flight Rules VHF Very High Frequency VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

LSSIP Year 2015 Switzerland 78 Released Issue