Michigan Wisconsin Minneso Ta Ont Ario
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Great Lakes Islands: Biodiversity Elements And
GREAT LAKES ISLANDS: BIODIVERSITY ELEMENTS AND THREATS A FINAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUGUST 6, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project has been provided by the Great Lakes Program Office (GLNPO) of the Environmental Protection Agency (Grant No. Gl-96521901: Framework for the Binational Conservation of Great Lakes Islands). We especially appreciated the support of our project officer, K. Rodriquez, and G. Gulezian, director of the GLNPO. Project team members were F. Cuthbert (University of Minnesota), D. Ewert (The Nature Conservancy), R. Greenwood (U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service), D. Kraus (The Nature Conservancy of Canada), M. Seymour (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service), K. Vigmostad (Principal Investigator, formerly of Northeast-Midwest Institute), and L. Wires (University of Minnesota). Team members for the Ontario portion of the project included W. Bakowsky (NHIC), B. Crins (Ontario Parks), J. Mackenzie (NHIC) and M. McMurtry (NHIC). GIS and technical support for this project has been provided by T. Krahn (Provincial Geomatics Service Centre, OMNR), J. Slatts (The Nature Conservancy), and G. White (The Nature Conservancy of Canada). Many others have provided scientific and policy support for this project. We particularly want to recognize M. DePhillips (The Nature Conservancy), G. Jackson (Parks Canada), B. Manny (Great Lakes Science Center), and C. Vasarhelyi (policy consultant). Cover photograph: A Bay on Gibraltar Island (Lake Erie) ©2005 Karen E. Vigmostad 2 Contents -
Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N. -
WLSSB Map and Guide
WISCONSIN LAKE SUPERIOR SCENIC BYWAY (WLSSB) DEVILS ISLAND NORTH TWIN ISLAND MAP KEY ROCKY ISLAND SOUTH TWIN ISLAND CAT ISLAND WISCONSIN LAKE SUPERIOR SCENIC BYWAY APOSTLE ISLANDS BEAR ISLAND NATIONAL LAKESHORE KIOSK LOCATION IRONWOOD ISLAND SCENIC BYWAY NEAR HERBSTER SAILING ON LAKE SUPERIOR LOST CREEK FALLS KIOSKS CONTAIN DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT EACH LOCATION SAND ISLAND VISITOR INFORMATION OUTER ISLAND YORK ISLAND SEE REVERSE FOR COMPLETE LIST µ OTTER ISLAND FEDERAL HIGHWAY MANITOU ISLAND RASPBERRY ISLAND STATE HIGHWAY COUNTY HIGHWAY 7 EAGLE ISLAND NATIONAL PARKS ICE CAVES AT MEYERS BEACH BAYFIELD PENINSULA AND THE APOSTLE ISLANDS FROM MT. ASHWABAY & NATIONAL FOREST LANDS well as a Heritage Museum and a Maritime Museum. Pick up Just across the street is the downtown area with a kayak STATE PARKS K OAK ISLAND STOCKTON ISLAND some fresh or smoked fish from a commercial fishery for a outfitter, restaurants, more lodging and a historic general & STATE FOREST LANDS 6 GULL ISLAND taste of Lake Superior or enjoy local flavors at one of the area store that has a little bit of everything - just like in the “old (!13! RED CLIFF restaurants. If you’re brave, try the whitefish livers – they’re a days,” but with a modern flair. Just off the Byway you can MEYERS BEACH COUNTY PARKS INDIAN RESERVATION local specialty! visit two popular waterfalls: Siskiwit Falls and Lost Creek & COUNTY FOREST LANDS Falls. West of Cornucopia you will find the Lost Creek Bog HERMIT ISLAND Walk the Brownstone Trail along an old railroad grade or CORNUCOPIA State Natural Area. Lost Creek Bog forms an estuary at the take the Gil Larson Nature Trail (part of the Big Ravine Trail MICHIGAN ISLAND mouths of three small creeks (Lost Creek 1, 2, and 3) where System) which starts by a historic apple shed, continues RESERVATION LANDS they empty into Lake Superior at Siskiwit Bay. -
NYS Coast Pilot 6
CoUNITEDas STATESt Pilot® Great Lakes: Lakes Ontario, Erie, Huron, Michigan, Superior and St. Lawrence River 2018 (48th) Edition This edition cancels the 47th Edition and includes all previously published corrections. Weekly updates to this edition are available at nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/coast-pilot/index.html They are also published in the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) U.S. Notice to Mariners. U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RDML Timothy Gallaudet, Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management II U.S. Coast Pilot 6 Pilot Coast U.S. 90° 88° 86° 84° 82° 80° 78° 76° 74° 72° Coast Pilot 6 – Chapter Index Chapter 4 – St. Lawrence River Above St. Regis 48° Chapter 5 – Lake Ontario Chapter 6 – Lake Erie MINNESOTA Chapter 7 – Detroit River LAKE SUPERIOR Chapter 8 – Lake St. Clair 13 Chapter 9 – St. Clair River Duluth ONTARIO Chapter 10 – Lake Huron Chapter 11 – Lake Michigan Ashland Sault St. Marie Chapter 12 – St. Marys River Chapter 13 – Lake Superior Marquette 12 46° Chapter 14 – Hudson River, New York Canals and Lake Champlain Montreal G E L O A R K G 4 I E A N R H E B V A I N U R Y E A C R N E G O R W I A N L . Green Bay H T S WISCONSIN C I 10 NEW Y ORK 44° M E K LAKE ONTARIO 5 A Toronto L Muskegon Bay City Milwaukee Syracuse Bu alo MICHIGAN 8 9 14 Detroit 11 LAKE ERIE 42° 7 Erie Chicago 6 P ENNSYLV ANIA Toledo Cleveland New York City 16 DEC2018 ILLINOIS INDIANA OHIO 16 DEC 2018 ¢ Preface III Preface he United States Coast Pilot is published by the National Ocean Service (NOS), National TOceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. -
Lake Superior South Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
Summary Monitoring and Assessment Lake Superior-South Watershed Why is it The undeveloped nature of the Lake Superior-South Watershed, along Minnesota’s North Shore within the Lake Superior Basin, is undoubtedly a key reason for the high important? water quality found in most parts of the watershed. This watershed covers 624 square miles of St. Louis and Lake counties, with nearly half of the land under state ownership (42%). Almost 90% is forested. The watershed is home to several small cities and supports diverse species of wildlife and fish populations. It contains 1,067 miles of streams of which 800 are designated as coldwater. Its immaculate waters produce some of the state’s highest-quality stream trout fisheries. The watershed is a valuable resource for drinking water, habitat for aquatic life, recreational opportunities and timber production. Key issues Overall, water quality conditions are good and can be attributed to the forest and wetlands that dominate the watershed’s land cover. Many stream segments have exceptional biological, chemical, and physical characteristics and should be considered for additional protections to preserve their high quality. The top five stream resources include: McCarthy Creek, Unnamed Creek (West Branch Little Knife River), Gooseberry River, Stewart River and Captain Jacobson Creek. Problem areas do occur but are typically limited to the lower reaches of streams where stressors from land use practices may accumulate. Impairments are likely a function of both natural and human-caused stressors. Historical and recent forest cover changes, along with urban/industrial development, draining of wetlands and damming of streams are likely stressors affecting biological communities within the watershed. -
The Portage Lake Volcanics (Middle Keweenawan) on Isle Roy Ale
THE PORTAGE LAKE VOLCANICS (MIDDLE KEWEENAWAN) ON ISLE ROYALE, MICHIGAN Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 754-C The Portage Lake Volcanics (Middle Keweenawan) on Isle Royale, Michigan By N. KING HUBER GEOLOGY OF ISLE ROYALE NATIONAL PARK, MICHIGAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 754-C Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600161 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price $1.05 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02399 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------------·-------------· C1 The Portage Lake Volcanics on Isle Royale--Continued Introduction ·····-·······-···---------------···················-··--········-··············· 1 Volcanic rocks-Continued Historical background ·················--····--············--···--······-····- 1 Stratigraphic units-Continued Scope of study ·····-·-·--··········--·-·············-····-·····················-···· 1 Ophite flows ---------------------------------------------------------- C18 Acknowledgments ··········--·····················--··-····--·········-···-·--· 2 Greenstone Flow-------------------------------------·--- 19 The Portage Lake Volcanics on the Keweenaw Peninsula__ 3 The Portage Lake Volcanics -
Apostle Islands National Lakehore Geologic Resources Inventory
Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Division Prepared by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich National Park Service August 7, 2010 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a geologic resources inventory report. The purpose of scoping is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and monitoring and research needs. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The National Park Service held a GRI scoping meeting for Apostle Islands National Lakeshore on July 20-21, 2010 both out in the field on a boating site visit from Bayfield, Wisconsin, and at the headquarters building for the Great Lakes Network in Ashland, Wisconsin. Jim Chappell (Colorado State University [CSU]) facilitated the discussion of map coverage and Bruce Heise (NPS-GRD) led the discussion regarding geologic processes and features at the park. Dick Ojakangas from the University of Minnesota at Duluth and Laurel Woodruff from the U.S. Geological Survey presented brief geologic overviews of the park and surrounding area. Participants at the meeting included NPS staff from the park and Geologic Resources Division; geologists from the University of Minnesota at Duluth, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, and U.S. Geological Survey; and cooperators from Colorado State University (see table 2). -
38 Lake Superior 1925 1954 2017
30 34 1954 35 24 8 4 5 7 3 9 21 36 17 KEWEENAW 25 20 38 32 HOUGHTON 19 10 18 29 28 37 6 39 13 14 15 16 ONTONAGON BARAGA 11 1 2 33 26 23 22 LUCE 31 12 27 GOGEBIC MARQUETTE ALGER CHIPPEWA IRON SCHOOLCRAFT DICKINSON MACKINAC DELTA 120 97 87 69 81 107 95 49 79 75 106 51 83 109 67 56 74 57 94 64 90 70 86 98 40 59 66 85 MENOMINEE 43 41 EMMET 89 78 53 1925 103 104 71 44 CHEBOYGAN PRESQUE ISLE 105102 63 48 CHARLEVOIX 96 73 58 112 60 ANTRIM OTSEGO MONTMORENCY ALPENA 82 LEELANAU 65 45 GRAND KALKASKA CRAWFORD OSCODA ALCONA 110 BENZIE TRAVERSE MANISTEE WEXFORD MISSAUKEE ROSCOMMON OGEMAW IOSCO 55 111 100 ARENAC 42 91 84 99 MASON LAKE OSCEOLA CLAREGLADWIN 54 HURON 92 BAY 108 52 OCEANA MECOSTA ISABELLA MIDLAND NEWAYGO TUSCOLA SANILAC 101 80 MONTCALM GRATIOT SAGINAW 61 MUSKEGON 62 GENESEE LAPEER 46 47 ST. CLAIR KENT SHIAWASSEE 88 OTTAWA IONIA CLINTON 93 50 MACOMB 119 OAKLAND 114 68 ALLEGANIBARRY EATONLNGHAM IVINGSTON 115 113 116 121 72 2017 VAN BURENJKALAMAZOO CALHOUNWACKSON WASHTENAW AYNE 118 76 77 117 BERRIEN CASS ST. JOSEPH BRANCH HILLSDALE LENAWEE MONROE tannard Rock S LAKE SUPERIOR 38 On August 26, 1835, while piloting the American Fur Company remote location. Coastguardsman gave the light station the nickname vessel John Jacob Astor, Capt. Charles C. Stannard blew off course “Stranded Rock” to underscore the isolation, and it was designated during a storm and discovered a previously unrecorded reef about a “stag station,” meaning no wives or other family members could be 25 miles from the Keweenaw Peninsula. -
Early Agriculture Within the Boundaries
015&~ API S EARLY AGRICULTURE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE APOSTLE ISLANDS NATIONAL LAKESHORE: AN OVERVIEW OF BEAR, IRONWOOD, MICHIGAN, OAK, OTTER, RASPBERRY, ROCKY, SOUTH TWIN AND STOCKTON ISLANDS AND THE MAINLAND UNIT (ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR BASSWOOD ISLAND ALSO INCLUDED) A Report Prepared for the Staff of the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Bayfield, Wisconsin / by Arnold R. Alanen Professor Department of Landscape Architecture School of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 June 1985 OBJECTIVES During the early 1980s this investigator participated with two other individuals in preparing a report on the early agricultural history of the Apostle Islands. 1 The report presented some background information on the overall agricultural development of the Apostles, but especially focused upon Basswood, Hermit, and Sand Islands. Several sources of information were used in preparing this first report. These included original Land Office and homestead records, census data, newspaper accounts, interviews, pictorial information, and field surveys. The report included on the following pages seeks to provide a more complete overview of early Apostle Islands agriculture by expanding the study to include islands other than Basswood, Hermit, and Sand (Figure 1). The additional islands considered in this report are Bear, Ironwood, Michigan, otter, Oak, Raspberry, South Twin, and Stockton. In addition, an effort has been made to provide some background information on an early farmstead (situated on Section 9, Township 51N, Range SW of Bayfield County) that once was built on what is now a part of the Apostle Islands mainland unit. Finally, additional information on two pre-emptors who made claims on Basswood Island was unearthed while doing this study; therefore, the subsequent account includes the new data. -
NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont. -
What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H
A publication oF the Superior Hiking TrAil AssoCiation SUmmEr 2019 What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H o im Malzhan iS the trail operations director T o for our sister trail organization the ice Age B y Fr Trail Alliance in Wisconsin. Doing business as esh T “Trail Eyes,” Tim was one of four entities the SHTA Tr hired in the fall of 2018 to evaluate and recom- ac mend renewal strategies for what we have dubbed k S mE D “The Big Bad Five,” those sections of the SHT most damaged from heavy use and old age (or both). i A Though all four evaluators—malzhan, Critical Connections Ecological Services (Jason and Amy Husveth), the north Country Trail Association, and (Continued on page 2) What the “Trail Eyes” Taught Us About the SHT (continued from cover) Great Lakes Trail Builders (Wil- lie Bittner)—did what we asked (provide specific prescriptions for the Big Bad Five), their ex- pert observations gave us much more: they shed light on the en- tire Superior Hiking Trail. In other words, what they saw on the Split Rock River loop, or the sections from Britton Peak to Oberg Mountain and Oberg to the Lutsen ski complex, or the proposed reroute of the SHT north of Gooseberry Falls State Park, were microcosms of bigger, more systemic issues with the SHT. ❚ “keep people on the Trail and water off of it.” This suc- cinct wisdom comes from Matt no bridge is not the only problem at the Split rock river loop. -
Erosion Control at Outer Island Light Station, Revised Environmental
EROSION CONTROL AT OUTER ISLAND LIGHT STATION REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Apostle Island National Lakeshore, Wisconsin NPS Contract Number: 1443-CX-2000-99-003 Task Order Number: T20009900328 April 2003 Prepared By: WOOLPERT LLP NATIONAL PARK SERVICE EROSION CONTROL AT OUTER ISLAND LIGHT STATION REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared By: Woolpert LLP 409 East Monument Avenue Dayton, Ohio 45402 April 2003 Outer Island Environmental Assessment 1 4/03 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Purpose and Need........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Background and Scope ......................................................................... 3 2.2 Relationship to Other Actions and Plans........................................................... 4 2.3 Issues................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Compliance with Federal or State Regulations ................................................. 4 3.0 Alternatives .................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Actions Common to All Alternatives................................................................ 13 3.2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................