Seachange International, Inc. 2004 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seachange International, Inc. 2004 Annual Report SeaChange International, Inc. | 2004 Annual Report How will the industry meet worldwide viewers' rising expectations for television on demand? SeaChange International, Inc. is a leader in the market for digital video systems for television.We create powerful server and software systems that manage, store, and distribute professional-quality digital video. Our innovative products are based on a scalable, distributed software architecture and standard technology components. As a result, we enable broadband, broadcast, satellite and new media companies to streamline operations and reduce costs, allowing for expanded services, new applications, and increased revenues. We’re providing the foundation that is allowing the television industry to meet the ever-increasing market for on-demand entertainment and information. SeaChange International, Inc. Financial Highlights (all numbers in thousands, except diluted earnings per share) CASH AND INVESTMENTS 122,043 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE 100,534 103,898 VOD SYSTEMS REVENUE 83,300 TOTAL REVENUE .20 62,800 Jan 31, 2004 148,166 Jan 31, 2003 (.77) .02 Jan 31, 2002 135,626 43,200 117,404 Jan 31, 2004 Jan 31, 2002 Jan 31, 2004 Jan 31, 2003 Jan 31, 2002 Jan 31, 2003 Jan 31, 2004 Jan 31, 2003 Jan 31, 2002 President’s Letter Dear Shareholders, This year we achieved our most significant financial performance ever. Each quarter we set new records in video-on- demand revenues, streams shipped and earnings. At the end of fiscal 2004 we earned $.20 per share and generated over $20 million in available cash.We are making real progress in bringing on-demand television to the world. Since 1993 we’ve focused on the vast opportunities in digital television. Each year we’ve achieved significant milestones that have broadened our market base and strengthened our technology. In 1996 we introduced the MediaCluster, which has become one of our foremost advantages. In 1997, we entered the hotel movie systems market as a precursor to residential video-on-demand and said we “intend to lead the personal television revolution.” 1998 saw the expansion of our market base with the introduction of the Broadcast MediaCluster, which enabled us to build new relationships with the content providers.We knew then that we needed to build solutions that would span the entire television industry from content origination, to delivery to payment mechanisms.This business grew nicely and, today, our systems are used by over 250 broadcasters around the world. In 1999, SeaChange was engaged in five VOD trials, including one with Comcast and one with Time Warner.We also made one of our best strategic decisions—to acquire Digital Video Arts, which now leads the industry in set-top application software development. Additionally, we introduced high quality digital video streaming for Internet applications.We were making great headway with technology innovation and product expansion. Fiscal 2001 was the year that VOD began to take hold.We received commitments from four of the top seven cable opera- tors: Comcast, Cablevision,Time Warner and Adelphia.We sold over 15,000 streams and introduced the industry’s first real-time encoding system to enable time-shifting of Broadcast content.To meet the growing international customer base, we increased our service staff and built a world-class global service organization providing 24x7x365 support. Two years ago,VOD commitments turned to deployments and our number of streams shipped rocketed to 166,000. We were honored by the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences with a prestigious Emmy Award for outstanding technical contribution to the television industry in recognition of our MediaCluster.We were indeed “leading the personal television revolution.” Fiscal 2003 showed continued progress and evolution.We deployed systems with eight of the top ten operators in North America. Our number of streams shipped escalated to almost half a million with the addition of another 270,000 deployed. Our real-time encoding system pushed the industry closer to the reality of “personal television,” with the advent of NBC programming being offered “on demand” in Comcast’s Philadelphia system. Clearly, a “sea change” was occurring in the way people consumed television. History is being written and our contribution is prominent. Fiscal 2004 was the year that VOD became mainstream in all major East Coast television markets and began its expansion across the country.The availability of high-quality content increased significantly, and operators moved beyond the movie-on-demand model to an offering with thousands of hours of unique television programming. Higher usage numbers, as well as dramatic churn reduction, made it clear that on- demand television was a financial winner for the cable operators.We shipped almost as many streams last year as we had in all prior years combined, an astonishing 433,000. Last year, new markets started to emerge internationally and we announced two significant deployments over DSL in Canada and Asia as well as a major cable deployment in Europe. One of our greatest achievements was our financial performance in fiscal year 2004. SeaChange met or exceeded First Call’s earnings’ estimates for all four quarters. During the year, we continued our revenue growth, our earnings steadily improved to $.20 per share and we generated significant amounts of free cash, ending the year with over $4 in cash and investments per share. At this point the question we are most often asked is,“Where does the market go from here?” VOD is available to less than 15 million homes today out of a growing universe of 70 million cable subscribers in America.What we see for the next 12 to 18 months is the continued expansion and growth of the US market. Beginning in the second half of this year, we expect to see the opportunity for VOD over both cable and DSL emerge worldwide.These markets present considerable potential for continued expansion of our leadership position. As we have all witnessed, the world gets smaller with every advance in television.We see events as they unfold around the world on our computers and our televisions.The advances in the management, distribution and consumption of content that make this possible represent an ever-growing market for SeaChange technology. We have three goals for this year and going forward.The first is to increase our already substantial leadership position in the global market for digital video technology.The second is to continue to produce a positive return for our shareholders, many of whom are our employees, and to build on the solid foundation of financial strength we have established.The third goal is to continue to focus on improving the quality of our products and services to our customers worldwide. Our success cannot be attributed to any one factor. It has been accomplished by a combination of dedicated efforts by bright, innovative and focused employees, continued enthusiasm from our customers and, of course, the advice and support of our directors and shareholders.To all of you, my heartfelt thanks again.We look forward to another great year! Sincerely, Bill Styslinger President, CEO and Chairman SeaChange International SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 Commission File Number: 0-21393 SEACHANGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 04-3197974 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 124 Acton Street, Maynard, MA 01754 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (978)-897-0100 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of The Act: None Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) Of The Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes È No ‘ As of July 31, 2003, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price for the registrant’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market on such date was $247,569,651. The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on April 12, 2004 was 27,382,782. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement (which is expected to be filed within 120 days after the Company’s fiscal year end) relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about July 14, 2004 to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. PART I This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain statements of a forward-looking nature which reflect the Company’s current views relating to future events or the future financial performance of the Company. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks and uncertainties, particularly the matters set forth in “Certain Risk Factors” below, which could cause actual events or results to differ materially from historical results or those indicated by such forward-looking statements.
Recommended publications
  • Termination Rates at European Level January 2021
    BoR (21) 71 Termination rates at European level January 2021 10 June 2021 BoR (21) 71 Table of contents 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 2 2. Fixed networks – voice interconnection ..................................................................... 6 2.1. Assumptions made for the benchmarking ................................................................ 6 2.2. FTR benchmark .......................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Short term evolution of fixed incumbents’ FTRs (from July 2020 to January 2021) ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4. FTR regulatory model implemented and symmetry overview ............................... 12 2.5. Number of lines and market shares ........................................................................ 13 3. Mobile networks – voice interconnection ................................................................. 14 3.1. Assumptions made for the benchmarking .............................................................. 14 3.2. Average MTR per country: rates per voice minute (as of January 2021) ............ 15 3.3. Average MTR per operator ...................................................................................... 18 3.4. Average MTR: Time series of simple average and weighted average at European level .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Options and Regulatory Mechanisms for Managing Radicalization on the Internet
    Policy options and regulatory mechanisms for managing radicalization on the Internet Paris, 30 September 2016 “[…] I firmly believe that in a free democratic society, freedom of speech and expression is one of the most prized freedoms which must be defended and upheld at any cost and this should be particularly so in the land of Voltaire. It is indeed unfortunate that in the world of today, when science and technology have advanced the frontiers of knowledge and mankind is beginning to realize that human happiness can be realized only through inter-dependence and cooperation, the threshold of tolerance should be going down. It is high time man should realize his spiritual dimension and replace bitterness and hatred by love and compassion, tolerance and forgiveness.” Justice Prafullachandra Bhagwati Dan Shefet (Individual Specialist) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the following for their support, valuable advice and input throughout the drafting of the Report: Dr. Indrajit Banerjee and his team in UNESCO’s Knowledge Societies Division The UNESCO Delegates and Ministries of Justice/Interior of countries that have participated in the Country Survey. Alexander Linden, Honorary advisor to the French Supreme Court Janice Duffy, Researcher, Australia Pavan Duggal, Supreme Court Lawyer, India Tom Høyem, Former Minister in Denmark under Poul Schlüter Francesca Musiani, Researcher at the CNRS Institute for Communication Sciences and Member of the French National Assembly’s Commission on the Law and Rights in the Digital Era Sami Mahbouli, Lawyer at The Tunisian Supreme Court and Columnist Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, Former Minister of Justice under Angela Merkel Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney, United States Viswa Sadasivan, CEO of Strategic Moves (Consultancy agency in Singapore) and former member of the Singaporean Parliament Mr K.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties IDP
    IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política E-ISSN: 1699-8154 [email protected] Universitat Oberta de Catalunya España Wesselingh, Ellen Marja Website Blocking: Evolution or Revolution? 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, núm. 19, octubre, 2014, pp. 35-47 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78835370004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Universitat Oberta de Catalunya www.uoc.edu/idp ARTICLE Website Blocking: Evolution or Revolution? 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties* Ellen Marja Wesselingh The Hague University of Applied Sciences Published: October, 2014 Abstract Copyright enforcement by private third parties – does it work uniformly across the EU? Since the inception of Napster, home copying of digital files has taken flight. The first providers of software or infrastructure for the illegal exchange of files were held contributory or vicariously liable for copyright infringement. In response, they quickly diluted the chain of liability to such an extent that neither the software producers, nor the service providers could be held liable. Moving further down the communication chain, the rights holders are now requiring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that provide access to end customers to help them with the enforcement of their rights. This article discusses case law regarding the enforcement of copyright by Internet Access Providers throughout Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • SEACHANGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Seachange International, Inc
    Building the framework for the future of television. SEACHANGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2005 ANNUAL REPORT the ever-increasing market on-demandentertainment for andinformation. the ever-increasing industry thetelevision isallowing that meet to thefoundation providing We’re services, newapplications, revenues. andincreased costs, andreduce operations streamline to companies expanded for allowing components. aresult, As enablebroadband, we broadcast, andnew media satellite based onascalable, distributedsoftware technology architectureandstandard store, digitalvideo. anddistributeprofessional-quality products are Ourinnovative television.Wefor powerful create server manage, that andsoftware systems SeaChange International, Inc. SeaChange International, SeaChange International, Inc. Financial Highlights (all numbers in thousands, except diluted earnings per share) 133,912 122,043 86,900 83,300 100,534 157,303 148,166 62,800 135,626 is aleaderinthemarketdigitalvideosystems for .34 .20 5 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 5 2 , 4 1 2 0 , 1 0 3 0 1 3 0 2 n 3 , 5 2 n a , 4 1 0 J n a 3 1 0 3 0 J a 0 3 0 2 J n , 0 2 n a , 1 2 5 J a , 1 3 4 0 J 1 3 3 0 0 n 3 0 0 2 n a , 0 2 J n a , 1 2 J a , 1 3 J 1 3 n 3 n a J n a J a J (.77) 3 0 0 DILUTED 2 , 1 EARNINGS 3 TOTAL REVENUE VOD SYSTEMS REVENUE n PER SHARE CASH AND INVESTMENTS a J President’s Letter Dear Shareholders, SeaChange is focused on a large emerging market for “personal television.” Worldwide, the business of television is shifting to meet viewers’ rising expectations for choice and convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Commission (Region A) Broadband Assessment
    Southwestern Commission (Region A) Broadband Assessment Prepared by ECC Technologies, Inc. February 2018 Southwestern Commission Broadband Assessment Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... pg. 4 1.1 Broadband Assessment Overview and Methodology .......................................... pg. 4 1.2 Results of Broadband Assessment ...................................................................... pg. 6 1.3 Next Steps – Further Analysis and Incorporation ................................................ pg. 7 2. Regional County Data ................................................................................. pg. 9 2.1 Residential Survey Questions and Responses ..................................................... pg. 9 2.2 Commercial Survey Questions and Responses .................................................. pg. 18 2.3 Respondent Map ............................................................................................. pg. 23 2.4 Speed Test Results ........................................................................................... pg. 23 3. Cherokee County Data .............................................................................. pg. 25 3.1 Residential Responses ...................................................................................... pg. 25 3.2 Commercial Responses .................................................................................... pg. 32 3.3 Provider Reported Availability vs. Speed
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT on the Operations of the Group of Makedonski Telekom AD - Skopje in 2011
    Confidential Makedonski Telekom AD – Skopje Orce Nikolov bb, 1000 Skopje ANNUAL REPORT on the operations of the Group of Makedonski Telekom AD - Skopje in 2011 On 13 February 2006, Magyar Telekom Plc., the controlling owner of Makedonski Telekom AD – Skopje (the Company), (via Stonebridge Communications AD - Skopje (under liquidation), majority shareholder of the Company), announced that it was investigating certain contracts entered into by another subsidiary of Magyar Telekom Plc. to determine whether the contracts were entered into in violation of Magyar Telekom Plc. policy or applicable law or regulation. Magyar Telekom’s Audit Committee retained White & Case, as its independent legal counsel to conduct the internal investigation. Subsequent to this on 19 February 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company, based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee of the Company and the Audit Committee of Magyar Telekom Plc., adopted a resolution to conduct an independent internal investigation regarding certain contracts in Macedonia. Based on publicly available information, as well as information obtained from Magyar Telekom and as previously disclosed, Magyar Telekom’s Audit Committee conducted an internal investigation regarding certain contracts relating to the activities of Magyar Telekom and/or its affiliates in Montenegro and Macedonia that totalled more than EUR 31 million. In particular, the internal investigation examined whether Magyar Telekom and/or its Montenegrin and Macedonian affiliates had made payments prohibited by U.S. laws or regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). The Company has previously disclosed the results of the internal investigation. Magyar Telekom’s Audit Committee informed the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Media and Communication Statistics 2010
    N O R D I C M E D I A T R E N D S 1 2 A Sampler of International Media and Communication Statistics 2010 Compiled by Sara Leckner & Ulrika Facht N O R D I C O M Nordic Media Trends 12 A Sampler of International Media and Communication Statistics 2010 COMPILED BY: Sara LECKNER and Ulrika FACHT The Nordic Ministers of Culture have made globalization one of their top priorities, unified in the strategy Creativity – the Nordic Response to Globalization. The aim is to create a more prosperous Nordic Region. This publication is part of this strategy. ISSN 1401-0410 ISBN 978-91-86523-15-2 PUBLISHED BY: NORDICOM University of Gothenburg P O Box 713 SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG Sweden EDITOR NORDIC MEDIA TRENDS: Ulla CARLSSON COVER BY: Roger PALMQVIST Contents Abbrevations 6 Foreword 7 Introduction 9 List of tables & figures 11 Internet in the world 19 ICT 21 The Internet market 22 Computers 32 Internet sites & hosts 33 Languages 36 Internet access 37 Internet use 38 Fixed & mobile telephony 51 Internet by region 63 Africa 65 North & South America 75 Asia & the Pacific 85 Europe 95 Commonwealth of Independent States – CIS 110 Middle East 113 Television in the world 119 The TV market 121 TV access & distribution 127 TV viewing 139 Television by region 143 Africa 145 North & South America 149 Asia & the Pacific 157 Europe 163 Middle East 189 Radio in the world 197 Channels 199 Digital radio 202 Revenues 203 Access 206 Listening 207 Newspapers in the world 211 Top ten titles 213 Language 214 Free dailes 215 Paid-for newspapers 217 Paid-for dailies 218 Revenues & costs 230 Reading 233 References 235 5 Abbreviations General terms .
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Cancon in the Age of New Media
    MA MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER PROMOTING CANCON IN THE AGE OF NEW MEDIA CHRIS MEJASKI Dr. David Skinner The Major Research Paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Joint Graduate Program in Communication & Culture Ryerson University - York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada July 25,2011 2 Canadian broadcasting policy has long pursued the belief that content produced by and for Canadians holds cultural value for its domestic audiences, in addition to economic significance for Canada's media industries. As the capabilities of wireless and mobile technologies have developed to allow consumption of content traditionally broadcast on television, stakeholders have questioned how to ensure culturally-rich, domestically-produced content is available for Canadian audiences by such means. As industry stakeholders have debated the potential value of Canadian content in an increasingly globalized media landscape, technologies have continued to advance, and Canadians have increasingly turned to new media to be infonned and entertained. With a lengthy history of media regulation, this paper will demonstrate how the Canadian government's slow, uncoordinated response to developing new media policy effectively perpetuates inhibiting tensions between cultural and economic goals. Questions that frame this enquiry include: What role does Canadian content playas a reflection of Canadian culture and support of the production industry within Canada's traditional broadcasting system? Is regulation of new media important to maintain traditional policy goals? If so, what kinds of regulation might be implemented in this new context? And to what degree does current new media policy succeed in pursuing cultural and industrial goals historically common to Canadian media regulation? In pursuing these questions, this paper will draw conclusions regarding the benefits of federal new media policy, and how the government can better advance domestic digital media production, as technologies continue to evolve.
    [Show full text]
  • Оператор Почетен Број Цена Ден/Мин Aeromobile 88299 791 Aeromobile (ONAIR) 88298 87 Afghanistan 93
    Оператор Почетен број Цена ден/мин Aeromobile 88299 791 Aeromobile (ONAIR) 88298 87 Afghanistan 93 49 Afghanistan 932290090 49 Afghanistan (ON-NET) 9320 21 Afghanistan (ON-NET) 9330 21 Afghanistan (ON-NET) 9340 21 Afghanistan (ON-NET) 9350 21 Afghanistan (ON-NET) 9360 21 Afghanistan-Mobile 9375 23 Afghanistan-Mobile (AWCC) 9370 22 Afghanistan-Mobile (AWCC) 9371 22 Afghanistan-Mobile (ETISALAT) 9373 20 Afghanistan-Mobile (ETISALAT) 9378 20 Afghanistan-Mobile (MTN) 9376 17 Afghanistan-Mobile (MTN) 9377 17 Afghanistan-Mobile (ROSHAN) 9372 20 Afghanistan-Mobile (ROSHAN) 9379 20 Afghanistan-Mobile (SALAAM) 9374 21 Albania 355 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552112 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552122 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552132 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552142 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552152 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552162 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552172 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552182 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552192 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 355222 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 355242 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552712 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3552812 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553112 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553122 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553132 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 355322 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 355342 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 355352 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553612 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553682 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553712 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553812 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553822 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553912 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553922 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3553932 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 355472 19 Albania (ALBTELEKOM) 3555112 19 Albania
    [Show full text]
  • Dagvaarding Stichting Brein Vs Ziggo, XS4ALL, Internet
    Heden, de zevende april twee-duizend-een-en-twintig, ten verzoeke van stichting STICHTING BREIN, statutair gevestigd te Amsterdam en kantoorhoudende aan de Siriusdreef 22-28 te (2132 WT) Hoofddorp (“BREIN”), gemeente Haarlemmermeer, voor deze zaak woonplaats kiezende te Amsterdam (1096 HA) aan het Amstelplein 1, ten kantore van de advocaten mrs. J.C.H. van Manen en R. van Kleeff die door haar als advocaat worden gesteld en als zodanig zullen optreden Heb ik, GEDAGVAARD 1 de besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid ZIGGO B.V. (“Ziggo”) statutair gevestigd te Utrecht en kantoorhoudende te (3511 WR) Utrecht aan de Boven Vredenburgpassage 128, op dat adres dit exploot gedaan en afschrift van dit exploot gelaten aan: 2 de besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid XS4ALL INTERNET B.V., (“XS4ALL”) statutair gevestigd te Amsterdam en kantoorhoudende te (1043 EJ) Amsterdam, aan de Teleportboulevard 121 3 de besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid KPN B.V. ("KPN") statutair gevestigd te Rotterdam en kantoorhoudende te (3072AP) Rotterdam, aan de Wilhelminakade 123 OM Op woensdag zes oktober tweeduizend-een-en-twintig (6 oktober 2021) om tien uur in de voormiddag (10:00), (de “Roldatum”), niet in persoon, maar vertegenwoordigd door een advocaat te verschijnen ter HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER LLP terechtzitting van de Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, locatie Lelystad, welke zitting aldaar zal worden gehouden in het gerechtsgebouw aan het Stationsplein 15 te Lelystad; MET AANZEGGING DAT: a. indien een gedaagde verzuimt advocaat te stellen of het hierna te noemen griffierecht niet tijdig betaalt, en de voorgeschreven termijnen en formaliteiten in acht zijn genomen, de rechter verstek tegen die gedaagde zal verlenen en de hierna omschreven vorderingen zal toewijzen, tenzij deze hem onrechtmatig of ongegrond voorkomt; b.
    [Show full text]
  • J.R Beaudrie
    J.R. BEAUDRIE Categories: People, Lawyers Gerald (J.R.) Beaudrie is a well-respected lawyer with expertise in all aspects of business law, and a practice focused on mergers and acquisitions and private equity. J.R. represents clients in a range of industries including technology, and the marketing and advertising sector. Providing guidance and assistance on general corporate commercial matters as well as transactions, J.R. advises on business structuring and organization, restructurings and reorganizations, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate finance, including private placements and credit facilities. He also works with his clients on the preparation and negotiation of contracts, agreements and corporate documents. With deep experience acting for professional service firms, clients trust J.R.’s thorough understanding of business law and his ability to navigate the complex laws and regulations that affect their companies and partnerships. Email: [email protected] Expertise: Business Law, Mergers & Acquisitions, Marketing & Advertising, Private Equity & Venture Capital, Technology Location: Toronto Phone: 416.307.4229 Position/Title: Partner, Business Law | Mergers & Acquisitions Education & Admissions: Degree: Called to the Ontario bar Year: 2006 ______ Degree: LLB University: University of Windsor Year: 2005 McMillan LLP | Vancouver | Calgary | Toronto | Ottawa | Montreal | Hong Kong | mcmillan.ca University: University of Detroit Mercy Year: 2005 ______ Degree: B.Comm. (Honours) University: University of Windsor Year: 2002
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints by Service Provider
    Appendix A ‐ Complaints by Service Provider Complaints Change all % of % Concluded Resolved Closed Resolved Closed Accepted Issued Accepted Rejected Accepted Y/Y Provider Accepted and Concluded Complaint Pre‐Investigation Investigation Reco. Decisions #100 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 1010100 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 1010580 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 1010620 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 1010738 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 1011295.com 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 295.ca 0.00% 0 ‐100.0% 000000000 3Web 0.04% 4 ‐42.9% 550000000 450Tel 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 768812 Ontario Inc. 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 8COM 0.61% 69 ‐ 688126330000 A dimension humaine 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 Acanac Inc. 0.68% 77 ‐35.8% 79 42 3 28 51000 Access Communications Inc. 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 Achatplus Inc. 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 ACN Canada 0.66% 75 41.5% 70 50 5 11 40000 AEBC Internet Corporation 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 AEI Internet 0.04% 5 400.0% 310200000 AIC Global Communications 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 Alberta High Speed 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 Allstream inc. 0.04% 4 ‐ 431000000 Altima Telecom 0.02% 2 ‐ 110000000 America Tel 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 Amtelecom Telco GP Inc. 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 Auracom 0.02% 2 ‐ 210100000 Avenue 0.00% 0 ‐ 000000000 Axess Communications 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 Axsit 0.01% 1 ‐ 100100000 B2B2C Inc. 0.02% 2 ‐33.3% 320100000 Bell Aliant Regional Communications LP 1.41% 160 ‐1.2% 162 124 6 21 10 1000 Bell Canada 32.20% 3,652 ‐6.6% 3,521 2,089 235 889 307 0110 BlueTone Canada 0.03% 3 ‐ 311100000 BMI Internet 0.00% 0 0.0% 000000000 Bragg Communications Inc.
    [Show full text]