DOCSLIB.ORG

15.2 the Aztec Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
15.2 the Aztec Empire Directions: Use this reading to identify the following details: Agriculture, Trade, Social Class, Culture, and the Demise of the Civilization. You should label the appropriate sections of reading with these labels. 15.2 The Aztec Empire How did the Aztec Empire become so powerful with such speed? The Earliest Days of Mexico Who were the Aztec people? The beginnings of the Aztec civilization occurred in the desert of modern-day Mexico. As you will read later, eventually the Aztec civilization grew to become a great empire after King Itzcóatl took power in 1428 CE. The origins of the Aztec people are uncertain. None of the earliest people of Latin America called themselves the Aztec; this name appeared only later, after the Spanish conquest. According to Aztec legend, the Toltec Empire started around 800 CE and spanned most of what is now Mexico and Central America. One group of people ruled by the Toltecs was the Mexica. When the Toltec Empire collapsed, around 1150 CE, the Mexica were forced out of their homeland, which they called Aztlán. The name Aztec developed in part from Aztlán, the name of their homeland. Though part of Aztec legend, historians believe that these events are historically accurate. The Mexica or Aztec had a reputation for savage warfare and therefore were unwelcome wherever they went. As a result, they lived as nomads, looking for a permanent place to settle. Another Aztec legend was the story of Copil and his uncle, the god Huitzilopochtli. Copil resented and tormented the Aztec because they were Huitzilopochtli’s chosen people. Copil was also angry at Huitzilopochtli because he believed the god had treated his mother unfairly. Copil planned to ambush Huitzilopochtli, but before he could do so, Huitzilopochtli killed Copil. Huitzilopochtli cut out Copil’s heart and threw it into a lake. Later, Huitzilopochtli told the Aztecs to settle where Copil’s heart could be found. They would know the place when they saw an eagle perched on a cactus, eating a snake. While the Aztec were roaming around the marshes surrounding Lake Texcoco, they saw the cactus and eagle and stopped on the spot to build their empire. In 1325, they settled on an island in the southwestern portion of Lake Texcoco. They named this place Tenochtitlán. Today, the ruins of Tenochtitlán lie in Mexico City, the capital of modern-day Mexico. During the time of the Aztec Empire, Tenochtitlán was a large city that had layers of defenses protecting it from any invading tribes. In the end, however, these defenses would be overcome by the Spanish conquistadores, or conquerors. The Aztec Build an Empire How did the Aztec people become united? Itzcóatl was the fourth leader of the Mexica, or Aztec, people. The Mexica called their leaders tlatoani, which means emperor. Itzcóatl came to power in 1428 CE and created a powerful empire by joining with two neighboring peoples to form the Triple Alliance. The three allies were the leaders of the cities of Tenochtitlán, Texcoco, and Tlacopan. Rather than fight each other for supreme power over other local towns and peoples, they agreed to share power. The three rulers worked together to defeat the powerful Tepanec Empire from Atzcapotzalco in central Mexico, which had previously controlled the Aztec. During their empire, the Tepanec had a large city located on the northern side of Lake Texcoco. Since Itzcóatl’s city of Tenochtitlán was on the southern side, defeating the Tepanec meant that the two sides of the lake were united politically under one ruler. The Aztec, or Mexica, gained large areas of land with the defeat of the Tepanec. This gave Itzcóatl much power in the region, and the empire became centralized under his rule. Conquered peoples could choose to leave the land in search of a new home, or they could pay tribute, a special tax paid to the Aztec emperor. This tribute helped to increase the wealth and resources available to Itzcóatl. These resources helped him to continue the conquests of new lands, which in turn brought further wealth and resources Further Expansion How did the Aztec Empire continue to expand under the rule of Itzcóatl? The tributes collected from the conquered lands made Itzcóatl a powerful and wealthy man. As part of the tribute, every six months, 800 large white mantas, or woven blankets, had to be delivered to Itzcóatl. Additionally, every year, a tribute of two warrior costumes and shields, six bins of maize (corn), two bins of beans, and four bins of herbs were also given to the emperor. Conquered regions also sent gold and enslaved people, the latter to be used as labor or as human sacrifices, to the Aztec leader as tribute. While the Triple Alliance divided material goods and resources taken during the conquests of new lands, only the Aztec were given the tributes. As the empire continued to expand and Itzcóatl’s power increased, he ordered that the existing history of the Aztec be destroyed, because he believed it was inaccurate and contained lies. As a result, the empire was given a shared history that was more closely related to the legends of the Aztec. This new history presented the Aztec as a culture that had always been powerful and emphasized Itzcóatl’s importance. Itzcóatl spent his reign expanding his empire beyond the Valley of Mexico and into the surrounding areas by adopting the conquered tribes into his territory. Under his leadership the empire spread quickly. The leaders following Itzcóatl took over additional territory, making the Aztec Empire the central block of Mexico and a powerful entity. Religion of the Aztec What role did religion play in Aztec society? Religion played a large role in the daily life of the Aztec people. The Aztec religion was a combination of many beliefs and practices from other Mesoamerican cultures. The Aztec believed that the current world was one in a series of four worlds, called suns, which had existed before it. They believed that each of these worlds had been completely destroyed before the new world began. Aztec religion was polytheistic, meaning the Aztec believed in many gods. Chief among these gods were Huitzilopochtli, the Aztec god of war; Quetzalcóatl, the feathered serpent; and Tonatiuh, the sun god. Considerable time and resources in the form of religious ceremonies were devoted to worshipping these gods. These religious ceremonies were dictated by the Aztec calendar, which was the one used in much of Mesoamerica, and was made up of separate calendars containing 365 days and 260 days. Many of the religious ceremonies performed by Aztec priests were intended to please the gods in an attempt to protect their civilization. For example, the Aztec believed that the sun god needed sacrifices of human hearts to ensure that the sun rose each day. Some of the sacrificial victims were enslaved people, but most were prisoners of war. Many of those chosen for sacrifice were believers in the religion and thought that they would go to the gods. The important role that priests played in these ceremonies meant that they held a high position within the rigid social structure of Aztec society. Daily Life in the Empire What was life like in the Aztec Empire? As the Aztec expanded their empire and centralized control, a class system developed. As new lands were conquered, control of that land was removed from the conquered people. Itzcóatl gave large areas of land to his allies and friends. This class system greatly affected the daily lives of people in the empire. Classes were strictly divided—and the upper and lower classes of society never mixed. As the empire grew with each new conquest, the divide between the classes grew larger as emperor gave more lands to the nobles and wealthy members of society. When the Spanish explorers arrived in the 1500s, they found that the lower classes of the Aztec society were not even allowed to enter the palace. All Aztec children, male and female, attended school in some form. However, school and the type of education the children received were different for each social class and gender. The education of males in Aztec society depended on their class. All boys received training as warriors. They learned fighting techniques and strategy, history, and religion and important rituals, as well as the correct social behaviors for their class. Children whose parents were skilled warriors or wealthy merchants were allowed to join the upper class school. Members of the upper classes were trained to become temple priests or government officials and were responsible for leading the next generation of Aztec people. As a result of this, they learned the laws of the culture. Upper-class boys also learned writing, medicine, engineering, and religion, including important songs and dances. School for young women of all classes in Aztec society was different from that for young men. Young women were educated for their roles in the home. They learned how to weave, sew, and cook. They also learned about their religion and how to sing and dance. Despite the increasing size and wealth of the empire, there was unrest within the Aztec civilization. The poor classes did not like the restrictions placed on them by the emperor, such as the need to pay taxes and tribute to members of the upper classes. There were also many tribes who were unhappy about being a part of the empire, and as a result, there were often rebellions against the Aztec emperor. The tribes did not like having to pay tribute, because it meant they had fewer resources for their own people. This restlessness in the empire paved the way for the Spanish conquest of the region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Environmental History of the Middle Rio Grande Basin
    United States Department of From the Rio to the Sierra: Agriculture Forest Service An Environmental History of Rocky Mountain Research Station the Middle Rio Grande Basin Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-5 Dan Scurlock i Scurlock, Dan. 1998. From the rio to the sierra: An environmental history of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-5. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 440 p. Abstract Various human groups have greatly affected the processes and evolution of Middle Rio Grande Basin ecosystems, especially riparian zones, from A.D. 1540 to the present. Overgrazing, clear-cutting, irrigation farming, fire suppression, intensive hunting, and introduction of exotic plants have combined with droughts and floods to bring about environmental and associated cultural changes in the Basin. As a result of these changes, public laws were passed and agencies created to rectify or mitigate various environmental problems in the region. Although restoration and remedial programs have improved the overall “health” of Basin ecosystems, most old and new environmental problems persist. Keywords: environmental impact, environmental history, historic climate, historic fauna, historic flora, Rio Grande Publisher’s Note The opinions and recommendations expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA Forest Service. Mention of trade names does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The author withheld diacritical marks from the Spanish words in text for consistency with English punctuation. Publisher Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins, Colorado May 1998 You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]
  • The Olmec, Toltec, and Aztec
    Mesoamerican Ancient Civilizations The Olmec, Toltec, and Aztec Olmecs of Teotihuacán -“The People of the Land of Rubber…” -Large stone heads -Art found throughout Mesoamerica Olmec Civilization Origin and Impact n The Olmec civilization was thought to have originated around 1500 BCE. Within the next three centuries of their arrival, the people built their capital at Teotihuacán n This ancient civilization was believed by some historians to be the Mother-culture and base of Mesoamerica. “The city may well be the basic civilization out of which developed such high art centers as those of Maya, Zapotecs, Toltecs, and Totonacs.” – Stirling Cultural Practices n The Olmec people would bind wooden planks to the heads of infants to create longer and flatter skulls. n A game was played with a rubber ball where any part of the body could be used except for hands. Religion and Art n The Olmecs believed that celestial phenomena such as the phases of the moon affected daily life. n They worshipped jaguars, were-jaguars, and sometimes snakes. n Artistic figurines and toys were found, consisting of a jaguar with a tube joining its front and back feet, with clay disks forming an early model of the wheel. n Large carved heads were found that were made from the Olmecs. Olmec Advancements n The Olmecs were the first of the Mesoamerican societies, and the first to cultivate corn. n They built pyramid type structures n The Olmecs were the first of the Mesoamerican civilizations to create a form of the wheel, though it was only used for toys.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Portraying the Here it is told and put forth how the ancient ones, those called and named Teochichimeca, people of Aztlan, Mexitin, Chicomoz- Aztec Past toca, as they sought and merited the land here, arrived and came into the great altepetl, the altepetl of Mexico Tenochtitlan, the place of renown, the sign, the site of the rock tuna cactus, in the midst of the waters; the place where the eagle rests, where the eagle screeches, where the eagle stretches, where the eagle eats; where the serpent hisses, where the fish fly, where the blue and yellow waters mingle—where the waters burn; where suffering came to be known among the sedges and reeds; the place of encountering and awaiting the various peoples of the four quarters; where the thirteen Teochichimeca arrived and settled, where in misery they settled when they arrived. Behold, here begins, here is to be seen, here lies written, the most excel- lent, most edifying account—the account of [Mexico’s] renown, pride, history, roots, basis, as what is known as the great altepetl began, as it commenced: the city of Mexico Tenochtitlan in the midst of the waters, among the sedges, among the reeds, also called and known as the place where sedges whisper, where reeds whisper. It was becoming the mother, the father, the head of all, of every altepetl everywhere in New Spain, as those who were the ancient ones, men and women, our grandmothers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers, great-great-grandparents, great- grandmothers, our forefathers, told and established in their accounts
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Mythology
    Aztec Mythology One of the main things that must be appreciated about Aztec mythology is that it has both similarities and differences to European polytheistic religions. The idea of what a god was, and how they acted, was not the same between the two cultures. Along with all other native American religions, the Aztec faith developed from the Shamanism brought by the first migrants over the Bering Strait, and developed independently of influences from across the Atlantic (and Pacific). The concept of dualism is one that students of Chinese religions should be aware of; the idea of balance was primary in this belief system. Gods were not entirely good or entirely bad, being complex characters with many different aspects and their own desires and motivations. This is highlighted by the relation between Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca. When the Spanish arrived with their European sensibilities, they were quick to name one good and one evil, identifying Quetzalcoatl with Christ and Tezcatlipoca with Satan during their attempts to integrate the Nahua peoples into Christianity. But to the Aztecs neither god would have been “better” than the other; they are just different and opposing sides of the same duality. Indeed, their identities are rather nebulous, with Quetzalcoatl often being referred to as “White Tezcatlipoca” and Tezcatlipoca as “Black Quetzalcoatl”. The Mexica, as is explained in the history section, came from North of Mexico in a location they named “Aztlan” (from which Europeans developed the term Aztec). During their migration south they were exposed to and assimilated elements of several native religions, including those of the Toltecs, Mayans, and Zapotecs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec PERSIAN Chart Key
    Aztec PERSIAN Chart Key Aztec ERAS: 600 C.E. to 1750 (Mexica) POLITICAL City-state rules by head ruler Leaders/groups Unlikely candidate for power after the Toltec Empire fell Forms of government Rulers and warrior nobles took lands and tribute from conquered towns. Empires Consolidated power of Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, and a smaller city, Tlacopan, into a triple State building/expansion alliance, realistically controlled by the Aztecs (dominated their allies & controlled the Political structures major share of tribute and land taken) Courts/laws Empire extended from the Tarascan frontier about 100 miles north of Mexico City Nationalism/nations southward to the Maya area Revolts/revolutions Human sacrifice = political terror Divided into 7 calpulli, or clans, which expanded and adapted to an imperial position; no longer kinship groups but residential groups (neighbors, allies, & dependants); distributed land to the heads of households, organized labor gangs and military units in times of war, & maintained temples & schools Great Speaker – in effect the emperor with great wealth and public power Prime minister held great power; relative of the ruler Governing council Exerted political domination but not direct administrative or territorial control ECONOMIC Food demanded as tribute from captured areas Agricultural, pastoral Developed system of irrigated agriculture; Chinampas – beds of aquatic weds, mud, Economic systems and earth that had been placed in frames made of cane and rooted to the lake floor; Labor systems/
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchy in the Representation of Death in Pre- and Post-Conquest Aztec Codices
    1 Multilingual Discourses Vol. 1.2 Spring 2014 Tanya Ball The Power of Death: Hierarchy in the Representation of Death in Pre- and Post-Conquest Aztec Codices hrough an examination of Aztec death iconography in pre- and post-Conquest codices of the central valley of Mexico T (Borgia, Mendoza, Florentine, and Telleriano-Remensis), this paper will explore how attitudes towards the Aztec afterlife were linked to questions of hierarchical structure, ritual performance and the preservation of Aztec cosmovision. Particular attention will be paid to the representation of mummy bundles, sacrificial debt- payment and god-impersonator (ixiptla) sacrificial rituals. The scholarship of Alfredo López-Austin on Aztec world preservation through sacrifice will serve as a framework in this analysis of Aztec iconography on death. The transformation of pre-Hispanic traditions of representing death will be traced from these pre- to post-Conquest Mexican codices, in light of processes of guided syncretism as defined by Hugo G. Nutini and Diana Taylor’s work on the performative role that codices play in re-activating the past. These practices will help to reflect on the creation of the modern-day Mexican holiday of Día de los Muertos. Introduction An exploration of the representation of death in Mexica (popularly known as Aztec) pre- and post-Conquest Central Mexican codices is fascinating because it may reveal to us the persistence and transformation of Aztec attitudes towards death and the after-life, which in some cases still persist today in the Mexican holiday Día de Tanya Ball 2 los Muertos, or Day of the Dead. This tradition, which hails back to pre-Columbian times, occurs every November 1st and 2nd to coincide with All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ day in the Christian calendar, and honours the spirits of the deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • Toltec.Html Toltec
    Text and pictures adapted from http://www.crystalinks.com/toltec.html Toltec The Atlantes are columns in the form of Toltec warriors in Tula The word Toltec in Mesoamerican studies has been used in different ways by different scholars to refer to actual populations and polities of pre-Columbian central Mexico or to the mythical ancestors mentioned in the mythical/historical narratives of the Aztecs. It is an ongoing debate whether the Toltecs can be understood to have formed an actual ethnic group at any point in Mesoamerican history or if they are mostly or only a product of Aztec myth. The scholars who have understood the Toltecs to have been an actual ethnic group often connect them to the archeological site of Tula, Hidalgo which is then supposed to have been the Tollan of Aztec myth. This tradition assumes the "Toltec empire" to have dominated much of central Mexico between the 10th and 12th century AD. Other Mexican cities such as Teotihuacán have also been proposed to have been the historical Tollan "Place of Reeds", the city from which the name Tolteca "inhabitant of Tollan" is derived in the Nahuatl language. The term Toltec has also been associated with the arrival of certain Central Mexican cultural traits into the Mayan sphere of dominance that took place in the late classic and early postclassic periods, and the Postclassic Mayan civilizations of Chichén Itzá, Mayapán and the Guatemalan highlands have been referred to as "toltecized" or "mexicanized" Mayas. For example the striking similarities between the city of Tula, Hidalgo and Chichen Itza have often been cited as direct evidence for Toltec dominance of the Postclassic Maya.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL NOT for DISTRIBUTION Figure 0.3
    Contents Acknowledgments ix A Brief Note on Usage xiii Introduction: History and Tlaxilacalli 3 Chapter 1: The Rise of Tlaxilacalli, ca. 1272–1454 40 Chapter 2: Acolhua Imperialisms, ca. 1420s–1583 75 Chapter 3: Community and Change in Cuauhtepoztlan Tlaxilacalli, ca. 1544–1575 97 Chapter 4: Tlaxilacalli Religions, 1537–1587 123 COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Chapter 5: TlaxilacalliNOT FOR Ascendant, DISTRIBUTION 1562–1613 151 Chapter 6: Communities Reborn, 1581–1692 174 Conclusion: Tlaxilacalli and Barrio 203 List of Acronyms Used Frequently in This Book 208 Bibliography 209 Index 247 vii introduction History and Tlaxilacalli This is the story of how poor, everyday central Mexicans built and rebuilt autono- mous communities over the course of four centuries and two empires. It is also the story of how these self-same commoners constructed the unequal bonds of compul- sion and difference that anchored these vigorous and often beloved communities. It is a story about certain face-to-face human networks, called tlaxilacalli in both singular and plural,1 and about how such networks molded the shape of both the Aztec and Spanish rule.2 Despite this influence, however, tlaxilacalli remain ignored, subordinated as they often were to wider political configurations and most often appearing unmarked—that is, noted by proper name only—in the sources. With care, however, COPYRIGHTEDthe deeper stories of tlaxilacalli canMATERIAL be uncovered. This, in turn, lays bare a root-level history of autonomy and colonialism in central Mexico, told through the powerfulNOT and transformative FOR DISTRIBUTION tlaxilacalli. The robustness of tlaxilacalli over thelongue durée casts new and surprising light on the structures of empire in central Mexico, revealing a counterpoint of weakness and fragmentation in the canonical histories of centralizing power in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Is a Journey: Easter Metaphors of Quetzalcoatl's Ancient World Journey
    ANAIS V CIMLP PROCEEDINGS V CIMLP LIFE IS A JOURNEY: EASTER METAPHORS OF QUETZALCOATL’S ANCIENT WORLD JOURNEY Julia Elizabeth Lonergan, Ph.D. E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper looks at the cognitive mappings behind Easter metaphors of Quetzalcóatl’s ancient world journey, using material culture metaphors from historical artifacts and oral histories from Tula Mexico, Hopi New Mexico, and the Egyptian Old Kingdom. The religious metaphors behind the concept of Quetzalcóatl, the ‘Eagle- Snake’ Ruler’s journey are shared cross-culturally, and the abstract metaphorical entailments cohere around the conceptual metaphor LIFE IS A JOURNEY. Quetzalcóatl is a multimodal metaphor referencing a complex embodied understanding of two hybrid objects occupying the same time and space. Cóatl means ‘Snake’, and is the figurative word for ‘twin’. The Aztec language itself, Nahuatl is a proper noun that means ‘using the animal power’, and relates animals and categorical properties to the tribes of Meso-American peoples. Similarly, animal attributes stand in metonymic relation to the corresponding powers of Quetzalcóatl to the Legends of JOURNEY at EASTER to the East. The advanced knowledge of the stars, math, science is found in the living emotions and religious beliefs of the people. Quetzal-cóatl is a noun-noun compound that means ‘Precious Twins’ from the literal ‘Plumed-Flying Serpent’, implies the Flying Eagle. The quetzal bird of Guatemala has long colorful feathers that are very valuable and precious. The conceptual metaphor LIFE IS A JOURNEY mappings is used with evidences from petroglyph rock art, ancient cliff symbols and Egyptian and Mexican pyramid frescos.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires
    Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires Cesare Marchetti and Jesse H. Ausubel FOREWORD Humans are territorial animals, and most wars are squabbles over territory. become global. And, incidentally, once a month they have their top managers A basic territorial instinct is imprinted in the limbic brain—or our “snake meet somewhere to refresh the hierarchy, although the formal motives are brain” as it is sometimes dubbed. This basic instinct is central to our daily life. to coordinate business and exchange experiences. The political machinery is Only external constraints can limit the greedy desire to bring more territory more viscous, and we may have to wait a couple more generations to see a under control. With the encouragement of Andrew Marshall, we thought it global empire. might be instructive to dig into the mechanisms of territoriality and their role The fact that the growth of an empire follows a single logistic equation in human history and the future. for hundreds of years suggests that the whole process is under the control In this report, we analyze twenty extreme examples of territoriality, of automatic mechanisms, much more than the whims of Genghis Khan namely empires. The empires grow logistically with time constants of tens to or Napoleon. The intuitions of Menenius Agrippa in ancient Rome and of hundreds of years, following a single equation. We discovered that the size of Thomas Hobbes in his Leviathan may, after all, be scientifically true. empires corresponds to a couple of weeks of travel from the capital to the rim We are grateful to Prof. Brunetto Chiarelli for encouraging publication using the fastest transportation system available.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1524 Nuremberg Map of Tenochtitlan, Its Sources and Meanings
    Mapping the Aztec Capital: The 1524 Nuremberg Map of Tenochtitlan, Its Sources and Meanings BARBARA E. MUNDY ABSTRACT: The map of Tenochtitlan published along with a Latin version of Heman Cortes's letters (Nuremberg, 1524) was the first picture Europeans had of the Culhua-Mexica city, the capital of the Aztec empire. The source of this woodcut map is unknown, and the author argues here that it was based on an indigenous map of the city. Once published in Europe, the city map and its companion map of the Gulf Coast, while certainly documentary, also assumed a symbolic function in supporting Cortes's (and thereby Spain's) just conquest of the Amerindian empire. KEYWORDS: Aztec maps, Culhua-Mexica, New Spain, Hernan Cortes, Amerindian maps, Tenochtitlan [Tenochtitlan, Temistitan], Mexico, cartography, Pre-Columbian maps. The startling news of the Spanish conquistador 1524, the city it showed was as much a fantasy as Hernan Cortes's entry into Mexico and his encoun- Amadis: the devastating war of conquest, coupled ter with the Aztecs in 1519 fascinated Europeans, with the internecine hatreds that Cortes unleashed, and a large audience awaited the publication of the had reduced the city to smoking rubble by August conquistador's letters describing his initial adven- of 1521. None the less, the map was the first image tures.' When these letters were translated into Europe had of the fantastic capital and soon would Latin and published in Nuremberg under the title become the most widespread. Throughout the Praeclara Ferdinddi. Cortesii de Noua maris Oceani sixteenth century and into the seventeenth, pub- Hyspania Narratio .
    [Show full text]
  • “Enclosures with Inclusion” Vis-À-Vis “Boundaries” in Ancient Mexico
    Ancient Mesoamerica, page 1 of 16, 2021 Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0956536121000043 “ENCLOSURES WITH INCLUSION” VIS-À-VIS “BOUNDARIES” IN ANCIENT MEXICO Amos Megged Department of General History, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31990, Israel Abstract Recent in-depth research on the Nahua Corpus Xolotl, as well as on a large variety of compatible sources, has led to new insights on what were “boundaries” in preconquest Nahua thought. The present article proposes that our modern Western concept of borders and political boundaries was foreign to ancient Mexican societies and to Aztec-era polities in general. Consequently, the article aims to add a novel angle to our understanding of the notions of space, territoriality, and limits in the indigenous worldview in central Mexico during preconquest times, and their repercussions for the internal social and political relations that evolved within the Nahua-Acolhua ethnic states (altepetl). Furthermore, taking its cue from the Corpus Xolotl, the article reconsiders the validity of ethnic entities and polities in ancient Mexico and claims that many of these polities were ethnic and territorial amalgams, in which components of ethnic outsiders formed internal enclaves and powerbases. I argue that in ancient Mexico one is able to observe yet another kind of conceptualization of borders/ frontiers: “enclosures with inclusion,” which served as the indigenous concept of porous and inclusive boundaries, well up to the era of the formation of the so-called Triple Alliance, and beyond.
    [Show full text]