DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocaust Education in the OSZE Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holocaust Education in the OSZE Region EDUCATION ON THE HOLOCAUST AND ON ANTI-SEMITISM: An Overview and Analysis of Educational Approaches Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights 1 June 2005 This document was prepared for the purpose of the OSCE Conference on Anti-Semitism and on Other Forms of Intolerance, Cordoba, 8-9 June 2005. This is a preliminary copy. The final printed version will be published after the Conference. This study was developed by the ODIHR’s Programme on Tolerance and Non-Discrimination, with the generous support of the Governments of Spain and the United States of America. TABLE OF CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................................................ 1 PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................... 4 PART A: HOLOCAUST EDUCATION IN THE OSCE REGION .......................................................................................... 15 I. OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF OSCE STATE RESPONSES ........................................................................ 17 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 41 EXAMPLES OF GOOD PRACTICES.................................................................................................................... 43 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 51 II. COUNTRY SUMMARIES.................................................................................................................................. 54 PART B: EDUCATION ON THE HOLOCAUST AND ON CONTEMPORARY ANTI-SEMITISM: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION........................................................................................................................ 111 I. EDUCATION ON THE HOLOCAUST AND CONTEMPORARY ANTI-SEMITISM: 4 COUNTRY OVERVIEWS................................................................................................................................. 113 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................................... 113 GERMANY .......................................................................................................................................................... 115 POLAND.............................................................................................................................................................. 120 DENMARK .......................................................................................................................................................... 124 SPAIN.................................................................................................................................................................. 127 II. LESSONS TO BE LEARNED: EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION ....... 132 1. TEACHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST TODAY: POSSIBILITIES AND CHALLENGES............................... 132 2. CONTEXTUALIZING HOLOCAUST EDUCATION: TEACHING JEWISH HISTORY AND CONTEMPORARY JEWISH LIFE ...................................................................................................................................................... 147 3. REFLECTIONS ON ELEMENTS OF EDUCATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM....................................... 151 4. SUPPLEMENTING HOLOCAUST EDUCATION IN RESPONSE TO NEW FORMS OF ANTI-SEMITISM .... 156 5. EDUCATE THE EDUCATORS........................................................................................................................ 163 III. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 165 ANNEXES ANNEX 1: QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE OSCE PARTICIPATING STATES ........................................................ 169 ANNEX 2: DECLARATION OF THE STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON THE HOLOCAUST 26-28 JANUARY 2000......................................................................................................................................... 170 ANNEX 3: DECLARATION OF THE BERLIN CONFERENCE ON ANTI-SEMITISM, 29 APRIL 2004 ............... 171 ANNEX 4: BRUSSELS DECLARATION OF THE OSCE CONFERENCE ON TOLERANCE AND THE FIGHT AGAINST RACISM, XENOPHOBIA AND DISCRIMINATION, 14 SEPTEMBER 2004....................................... 174 ANNEX 5: DOCUMENT OF THE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL, MAASTRICHT 2003: DECISION NO. 4/03 ON TOLERANCE AND NON-DISCRIMINATION, MC.DEC/4/03, 2 DECEMBER 2003............................................ 178 ANNEX 6: ONLINE INFORMATION ON HOLOCAUST EDUCATION................................................................ 181 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was developed by the ODIHR’s Programme on Tolerance and Non-Discrimination, with generous support from the Governments of Spain and the United States of America. Numerous institutions and experts participated in the preparations; their contribution is gratefully acknowledged: The Introduction was prepared by Karen Polak, Chair of the Educational Working Group, Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research, and Head of Program Development of the Educational Department at Anne Frank House, Amsterdam. Based on the responses of participating States to a questionnaire sent to them by the ODIHR, Dr. Juliane Wetzel (Center for Research on Antisemitism, Technical University Berlin and Chair of the Academic Working Group, Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research) and Dr. Angelika Königseder of the Berlin Center for Research on Antisemitism, Technical University Berlin, contributed to the general analysis and recommendations on Holocaust education in Part A. The country overviews, analysis, and recommendations in Part B are based on the research and analysis prepared by Ms. Hanne Thoma (Task Force on Antisemitism and Education, American Jewish Committee Berlin) who was assisted by Barbara Schäuble (Task Force on Antisemitism and Education), Franziska Bruder, Frauke Büttner, and Thorsten Wagner, who carried out essential background research with the support of Deidre Berger, Managing Director, American Jewish Committee (Berlin Office). The following individuals and institutions also provided the ODIHR and experts with information or background research: Christine May Ament; Dr. Ilya Altman, Co-chairman, Russian Research and Educational Holocaust Center; Rabbi Andrew Baker, Director, International Jewish Affairs, American Jewish Committee; Richelle Budd Caplan, Director, Asper International Holocaust Studies Program, International School for Holocaust Studies, Yad Vashem, Israel; Pascale Charhon, Director, and Carine Douenias, Project Manager, Centre Européen Juif d’Information in Belgium; Prof. Mikhail Chlenov, Secretary-General, Euro-Asian Jewish Congress; Cllr. Aba M. Dunner, Executive Director, Conference of European Rabbis; Stephen Feinberg, Director, National Outreach Education, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Jerold Gotel, Director of Overseas Projects at the London Jewish Cultural Centre; Dr. Felicitas Hentschke, Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin Institute for Advanced Study; Neville Kluk, Chief Executive, European Council of Jewish Communities; Dr. Mónika Kovács, Hannah Arendt Association, Budapest; Mark Levin, Executive Director, and Lesley Weiss, Director of Community Services and Cultural Affairs, National Conference on Soviet Jewry; Dr. Markus Meckl, Guðmundur Gunnarsson, and Jakob Þór Kristjánsson, University of Akureyri, Faculty of Law and Social Science, Akureyri, Iceland; Dr. Brigitte Mihok, Center for Research on Antisemitism, Technical University Berlin; Dr. Igor Shchupak, Director, Tkuma Central Ukrainian Holocaust Foundation; Tatiana Smolina, Assistant Lecturer, Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Herzen State Pedagogical University, St. Petersburg; Dr. Franklin J. Swartz, President, Voluntas, Belarus; Michael Whine, Community Security Trust; and the Embassy of the State of Israel in Poland. Dr. Peter Widmann of the Center for Research on Antisemitism, Technical University Berlin, and Dr. David M. Crowe of Elon University prepared input on Roma and Sinti. Within the ODIHR’s Tolerance and Non-Discrimination Programme, Dr. Kathrin Meyer (Adviser on Anti- Semitism Issues), Anna Chipczyńska (Expert/Consultant), and Dennis van der Veur and Nav Purewall (Project Officers) developed this study and co-ordinated input received from above-mentioned individuals and institutions. Steven Wagenseil provided suggestions for editing and the final structure of the study. 1 PREFACE In the wake of a resurgence of anti-Semitism in parts of the OSCE region in recent years, OSCE participating States have strengthened their resolve to confront anti-Semitism as well as other forms of discrimination, intolerance, racism and xenophobia. Recognizing the role anti-Semitism played throughout history as a major threat to freedom, the OSCE Ministerial Councils at Porto (December 2002) and Maastricht (December 2003) and the OSCE Permanent Council in April 2004
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Ángel De Budapest Egy Angyal Budapesten
    EL ÁNGEL DE BUDAPEST EGY ANGYAL BUDAPESTEN EL ÁNGEL DE BUDAPEST EGY ANGYAL BUDAPESTEN 4 En memoria del diplomático español Ángel Sanz Briz Justo entre las Naciones (1910-1980), quien en 1944, junto con los empleados y colaboradores de la Legación de España en Budapest, salvó la vida de más de 5.000 judíos húngaros de la persecución del nazismo. “No te quedes inactivo cuando derraman la sangre de tu prójimo” (Levítico 19/16.) Embajada de España en Budapest (Hungría), 2015 IN MEMORIAM Ángel Sanz Briz a „Világ Igaza” (1910-1980), spanyol diplomata, 1944-ben Budapesten a Span- yol Követség munkatársaival és segítőivel közösen több mint 5000 magyar zsidó életét mentette meg a náci üldöztetéstől”. „…ne légy tétlen, ha felebarátaid vérét ontják” (3Móz. 19:16) „ Spanyol Nagykövetség, 2015 5 5 Antisemitismo, Antiszemitizmus, persecución üldöztetés y deportaciones és deportálások Al poco de comenzar la segunda guerra mundial Kevéssel a II. világháború kitörése után, a háttérben y con el telón de fondo del auge del nazismo y del Európában a nácizmus és az antiszemitizmus antisemitismo en Europa, se promulgaron una se- megerősödése mellett, számos olyan törvényt rie de leyes en Hungría contra la población judía hírdettek ki Magyarországon, amelyek szörnyű que les impuso unas condiciones terribles. Así lo helyzetbe hozták a zsidó lakosságot. Katarina Bohrer, narra la superviviente judía húngara Katarina Bo- egy túlélő magyar zsidó így meséli el: hrer: „ […] Például, a gimnáziumban egy osztályban csak ”[…] Por ejemplo, en el instituto, en la clase no podía 6-7 zsidó származású diák tanulhatott. Ez volt a haber más de 6 ó 7 estudiantes judíos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Progressive Judaism in Poland—An Outline
    The Influence of Progressive Judaism in Poland ♦ 1 The Influence of Progressive Judaism in Poland—an Outline Michał Galas Jagiellonian University In the historiography of Judaism in the Polish lands the influence of Reform Judaism is often overlooked. he opinion is frequently cited that the Polish Jews were tied to tradition and did not accept ideas of religious reform coming from the West. his paper fills the gap in historiography by giving some examples of activities of progressive communities and their leaders. It focuses mainly on eminent rabbis and preachers such as Abraham Goldschmidt, Markus Jastrow, and Izaak Cylkow. Supporters of progressive Judaism in Poland did not have as strong a position as representatives of the Reform or Conservative Judaism in Germany or the United States. Religious reforms introduced by them were for a number of reasons moderate or limited. However, one cannot ignore this move- ment in the history of Judaism in Poland, since that trend was significant for the history of Jews in Poland and Polish-Jewish relations. In the historiography of Judaism in the Polish lands, the history of the influ- ence of Reform Judaism is often overlooked. he opinion is frequently cited that the Polish Jews were tied to tradition and did not accept ideas of religious reform coming from the West. his opinion is perhaps correct in terms of the number of “progressive” Jews, often so-called proponents of reform, on Polish soil, in comparison to the total number of Polish Jews. However, the influence of “progressives” went much further and deeper, in both the Jewish and Polish community.
    [Show full text]
  • A Matter of Comparison: the Holocaust, Genocides and Crimes Against Humanity an Analysis and Overview of Comparative Literature and Programs
    O C A U H O L S T L E A C N O N I T A A I N R L E T L N I A R E E M C E M B R A N A Matter Of Comparison: The Holocaust, Genocides and Crimes Against Humanity An Analysis And Overview Of Comparative Literature and Programs Koen Kluessien & Carse Ramos December 2018 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance A Matter of Comparison About the IHRA The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is an intergovernmental body whose purpose is to place political and social leaders’ support behind the need for Holocaust education, remembrance and research both nationally and internationally. The IHRA (formerly the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research, or ITF) was initiated in 1998 by former Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson. Persson decided to establish an international organisation that would expand Holocaust education worldwide, and asked former president Bill Clinton and former British prime minister Tony Blair to join him in this effort. Persson also developed the idea of an international forum of governments interested in discussing Holocaust education, which took place in Stockholm between 27–29 January 2000. The Forum was attended by the representatives of 46 governments including; 23 Heads of State or Prime Ministers and 14 Deputy Prime Ministers or Ministers. The Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust was the outcome of the Forum’s deliberations and is the foundation of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. The IHRA currently has 31 Member Countries, 10 Observer Countries and seven Permanent International Partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report on Holocaust Education in Task Force Member Countries
    Country Report on Holocaust Education in Task Force Member Countries NORWAY Date of issue: 1 November 2005 The Center for Studies of the Holocaust and Religious Minorities in Norway (The Holocaust Center), Oslo, is responsible for the following report on Holocaust education in Norway. Summary In the last 30 years, Holocaust awareness in Norway has increased in both the educational sector and society in general. The Holocaust has been given greater prominence in the educational system and in textbooks. It has also become more and more common for schools to take part in study trips to former extermination and concentration camps in Germany and Poland, such as Sachsenhausen, Ravensbrück, and Auschwitz. Work on Holocaust research, educational programmes and teacher training is intensifying. The Holocaust Center, which was established in 2001, is an important national institution in the field of Holocaust research, documentation, information and education. The Ministry of Education and Research is responsible for implementing national educational policy. A common standard is ensured through legislation and nationwide curricula. As part of an educational reform, the syllabi for all school subjects are now being revised. Implementation is scheduled for 2006–7. The new syllabuses are less specific than their predecessors, and more freedom will be given to textbook writers, head-teachers and teachers. This means that there will be a greater need for educational material about the Holocaust. In this regard, the ITF is an important forum for exchange of information, documentation and views on educational policy. Full report following the question guideline: 1. What official directives from government ministries and/or local authorities regarding the teaching of the Holocaust exist in your country? The Ministry of Education and Research is Norway’s highest public administrative agency for educational matters and is responsible for implementing national educational policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews: Part II
    The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews: Part II CARL0 MATTOGNO 1. Birth and Development of Revisionism ational Socialist policy in the matter of Jewish emigration, N pursued officially until the beginning of February 1942, thus posed a question that really was "throbbing," to use again the adjective employed by Poliakov. If it was true that exterminating the Jews "conformed to the fundamental objective of National social ism"^; if it was true that it was not "the coming to a head of an unforeseeable explosion of violence, or of a betrayal of trust by subordinates, but the fruit of an ideology of death and of an organic design"^; if it was true that "according to Hitler, among the ends that had to be achieved thanks to the war, the general extermination of the Jews had a very important place, to the realization of which the German government would devote a large part of its forces,"3 for what mysterious reason did Adolf Hitler deprive himself of at least a million victims by allowing them to emigrate? It was thus inevitable that so atrocious an accusation, based essentially on "third and fourth hand accounts," on 'Wle game of psychological deductions," knowing that "all these could offer was fragile and speculative," and on "fragmentary and sometimes hypothetical answers," be placed in doubt. In the immediate post-war period and in the following years severe criticisms were formulated in regard to the trials of those who were called "Nazi war criminalsn-in particular, the Nuremberg trial4-and concerning the behavior of the Allies during the war.5 The first to raise doubt about the reality of the "extermination" of the Jews was the Frenchman, Paul Rassinier,a who is justly considered to be the precursor of present-day Revisionism.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Students Know and Understand About the Holocaust? Evidence from English Secondary Schools
    CENTRE FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Stuart Foster, Alice Pettigrew, Andy Pearce, Rebecca Hale Centre for Holocaust Education Centre Adrian Burgess, Paul Salmons, Ruth-Anne Lenga Centre for Holocaust Education What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Cover image: Photo by Olivia Hemingway, 2014 What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Stuart Foster Alice Pettigrew Andy Pearce Rebecca Hale Adrian Burgess Paul Salmons Ruth-Anne Lenga ISBN: 978-0-9933711-0-3 [email protected] British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A CIP record is available from the British Library All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permissions of the publisher. iii Contents About the UCL Centre for Holocaust Education iv Acknowledgements and authorship iv Glossary v Foreword by Sir Peter Bazalgette vi Foreword by Professor Yehuda Bauer viii Executive summary 1 Part I Introductions 5 1. Introduction 7 2. Methodology 23 Part II Conceptions and encounters 35 3. Collective conceptions of the Holocaust 37 4. Encountering representations of the Holocaust in classrooms and beyond 71 Part III Historical knowledge and understanding of the Holocaust 99 Preface 101 5. Who were the victims? 105 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust/Shoah the Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-Day Poland
    NOW AVAILABLE remembrance a n d s o l i d a r i t y Holocaust/Shoah The Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-day Poland in 20 th century european history Ways of Survival as Revealed in the Files EUROPEAN REMEMBRANCE of the Ghetto Courts and Police in Lithuania – LECTURES, DISCUSSIONS, remembrance COMMENTARIES, 2012–16 and solidarity in 20 th This publication features the century most significant texts from the european annual European Remembrance history Symposium (2012–16) – one of the main events organized by the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity in Gdańsk, Berlin, Prague, Vienna and Budapest. The 2017 issue symposium entitled ‘Violence in number the 20th-century European history: educating, commemorating, 5 – december documenting’ will take place in Brussels. Lectures presented there will be included in the next Studies issue. 2016 Read Remembrance and Solidarity Studies online: enrs.eu/studies number 5 www.enrs.eu ISSUE NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 2016 REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY EDITED BY Dan Michman and Matthias Weber EDITORIAL BOARD ISSUE EDITORS: Prof. Dan Michman Prof. Matthias Weber EDITORS: Dr Florin Abraham, Romania Dr Árpád Hornják, Hungary Dr Pavol Jakubčin, Slovakia Prof. Padraic Kenney, USA Dr Réka Földváryné Kiss, Hungary Dr Ondrej Krajňák, Slovakia Prof. Róbert Letz, Slovakia Prof. Jan Rydel, Poland Prof. Martin Schulze Wessel, Germany EDITORIAL COORDINATOR: Ewelina Pękała REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY PUBLISHER: European Network Remembrance and Solidarity ul. Wiejska 17/3, 00–480 Warszawa, Poland www.enrs.eu, [email protected] COPY-EDITING AND PROOFREADING: Caroline Brooke Johnson PROOFREADING: Ramon Shindler TYPESETTING: Marcin Kiedio GRAPHIC DESIGN: Katarzyna Erbel COVER DESIGN: © European Network Remembrance and Solidarity 2016 All rights reserved ISSN: 2084–3518 Circulation: 500 copies Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina Commemorates the International Day in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust Within the Framework of the International
    Argentina commemorates the International Day in memory of the victims of the Holocaust Within the framework of the International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust – which was settled by the United Nations in 2005 in remembrance of the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz on January 27, 1945- yesterday the national government organized its ceremony, which was attended by members of the national government, authorities of the City of Buenos Aires, survivors and members of different organizations of the Jewish community and the civil society committed with the Holocaust remembrance. The ceremony was organized by the Argentinean Chapter of the IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance), the main international organization dedicated to the research, remembrance and education on the Holocaust. The IHRA is currently integrated by 31 member countries: States of Europe, Israel, United States, Canada and Argentine (which is the only full member of Latin America). The IHRA Local Chapter is formed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Justice and Humans Rights (represented by the Secretary of Humans Rights and Cultural Pluralism) and organizations of the civil society. It has an annual rotating Chairmanship among the Ministries, being in 2016 Chaired by the Secretary of Humans Rights and Cultural Pluralism from the Ministry of Justice and Humans Rights. In this opportunity, the ceremony was held together with the inauguration of the National Monument to honor Holocaust Survivors and also with the inauguration of the “Paseo de los Justos” (The Righteous Square). The Monument consists of a concrete wall composed by 114 cubes with impressions of objects of everyday life, emphasizing the absence of the human being through these marks carved on stone.
    [Show full text]
  • SS-Totenkopfverbände from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande)
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history SS-Totenkopfverbände From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande) Navigation Not to be confused with 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, the Waffen-SS fighting unit. Main page This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason Contents has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2010) Featured content Current events This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Random article citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) Donate to Wikipedia [2] SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), rendered in English as "Death's-Head Units" (literally SS-TV meaning "Skull Units"), was the SS organization responsible for administering the Nazi SS-Totenkopfverbände Interaction concentration camps for the Third Reich. Help The SS-TV was an independent unit within the SS with its own ranks and command About Wikipedia structure. It ran the camps throughout Germany, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Community portal Buchenwald; in Nazi-occupied Europe, it ran Auschwitz in German occupied Poland and Recent changes Mauthausen in Austria as well as numerous other concentration and death camps. The Contact Wikipedia death camps' primary function was genocide and included Treblinka, Bełżec extermination camp and Sobibor. It was responsible for facilitating what was called the Final Solution, Totenkopf (Death's head) collar insignia, 13th Standarte known since as the Holocaust, in collaboration with the Reich Main Security Office[3] and the Toolbox of the SS-Totenkopfverbände SS Economic and Administrative Main Office or WVHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 42)
    UNITED CRC NATIONS Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/129/Add.1 6 October 2004 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Third periodic report of States parties due in 2003 NORWAY* ** [24 April 2003] * For the second periodic report submitted by Norway, see CRC/C/70/Add.2; for its consideration by the Committee on 2 June 2000, see CRC/C/SR.625-626 and CRC/C/15/Add.126. ** In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.04-44570 (E) 040105 CRC/C/129/Add.1 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Foreword ................................................................................................... 1 - 3 5 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 - 17 5 CHAPTER I. GENERAL MEASURES OF IMPLEMENTATION .... 18 - 77 8 A. Measures within national legislation and practice (article 4) ................................................................................ 18 - 53 8 B. Measures to increase awareness among adults and children of the principles and provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (article 42) .............................................. 54 - 74 17 C. Measures to make Norway’s report widely available ............ 75 - 77 22 CHAPTER II. DEFINITION OF THE CHILD ..................................... 78 - 100 23 CHAPTER III. GENERAL PRINCIPLES .............................................. 101 - 212 28 A. Non-discrimination (article 2) ............................................... 101 - 136 28 B. The best interests of the child (article 3) ............................... 137 - 175 35 C. The right to life, survival and development (article 6) .......... 176 - 180 42 D. Respect for the views of the child (article 12) ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering and Forgetting: the Holocaust in 21St Century Britain
    Remembering and Forgetting: The Holocaust in 21st Century Britain Item Type Article Authors Critchell, Kara Citation Critchell, K. (2016). Remembering and forgetting: the Holocaust in 21st century Britain. Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History, (10), 23-59. DOI 10.48248/issn.2037-741X/813 Publisher Fondazione Centro di Documentazione Ebraica Contemporanea Journal Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 27/09/2021 19:34:33 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622948 Remembering and Forgetting: The Holocaust in 21st Century Britain “The world has lost a great man. We must never forget Sir Nicholas Winton's humanity in saving so many children from the Holocaust.”1 “MPs’ have voted against an attempt to compel the Government to offer sanctuary in the UK to 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees from Europe.”2 Although the preceding years had borne witness to a heightened engagement with the Holocaust in the political and public spheres, with the establishment of Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) on 27 January 2001, Britain entered a new phase in the development of its Holocaust consciousness. In the fifteen years since the inaugural ceremony took place Britain has sought to position itself at the very forefront of Holocaust remembrance and education on a national, international, and supranational, level.3 As such, the Holocaust has emerged as a dominant socio-political symbol in 21st century Britain despite the fact that, as Bob Moore has highlighted, “the Holocaust intersects with British history in very few ways.”4 This article will discuss the increasingly central role of Holocaust commemoration and education in 21st century Britain, and will consider how it has not only come to impact conceptualisation of the historical event, but also its influence on broader interpretations of British identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Survival in Budapest, March 1944 – February 1945
    DECISIONS AMID CHAOS: JEWISH SURVIVAL IN BUDAPEST, MARCH 1944 – FEBRUARY 1945 Allison Somogyi A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: Christopher Browning Chad Bryant Konrad Jarausch © 2014 Allison Somogyi ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Allison Somogyi: Decisions amid Chaos: Jewish Survival in Budapest, March 1944 – February 1945 (Under the direction of Chad Bryant) “The Jews of Budapest are completely apathetic and do virtually nothing to save themselves,” Raoul Wallenberg stated bluntly in a dispatch written in July 1944. This simply was not the case. In fact, Jewish survival in World War II Budapest is a story of agency. A combination of knowledge, flexibility, and leverage, facilitated by the chaotic violence that characterized Budapest under Nazi occupation, helped to create an atmosphere in which survival tactics were common and widespread. This unique opportunity for agency helps to explain why approximately 58 percent of Budapest’s 200,000 Jews survived the war while the total survival rate for Hungarian Jews was only 26 percent. Although unique, the experience of Jews within Budapest’s city limits is not atypical and suggests that, when fortuitous circumstances provided opportunities for resistance, European Jews made informed decisions and employed everyday survival tactics that often made the difference between life and death. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank everybody who helped me and supported me while writing and researching this thesis. First and foremost I must acknowledge the immense support, guidance, advice, and feedback given to me by my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]