Sparaxis Bulbifera (Iridaceae) Invading a Clay Based Treatment, the Number of S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

26 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.18(1) 2003 three treatments) with five replicates of each treatment. In August 2000, before Sparaxis bulbifera (Iridaceae) invading a clay based treatment, the number of S. bulbifera adults wetland on the Swan Coastal Plain – control methods (flowering plants) and juveniles (non flow- ering plants) in each plot was counted and and observations on the reproductive biology a cover estimate (Braun-Blanquet) scored for each species (native and introduced) in Kate Brown and Kris Brooks, Environmental Weeds Action Network, each plot. In early October 2000 the her- c/- Swan Catchment Centre, PO Box 1906, Midland, Western Australia 6936, bicide was carefully spot sprayed in each Australia. Email: [email protected] treatment. As this weed grows very closely amongst the native herbs and shrubs these were also subject to herbicide application. Metsulfuron methyl (Brushoff®, 600 g kg-1 metsulfuron methyl) was applied from a Summary competition from weeds such as Sparaxis 15 litre backpack sprayer at 2.5 g ha-1 and Sparaxis bulbifera, a cormous geophyte bulbifera. This South African cormous spe- at 1.0 g ha-1 and chlorsulfuron (Glean®, 750 from the Cape Region of South Africa, cies is a serious invader of clay based wet- g kg-1 chlorsulfuron) was applied at 2.5 g is a serious invasive weed of clay based lands on the Swan Coastal Plain (Hussey ha-1. All were applied with the penetrant wetlands on the Swan Coastal Plain. et al. 1997). Once established it forms dense Pulse® (1000 g L-1 polydimethylsiloxane) Where it invades these wetlands it forms monocultures displacing herbaceous flora at 2 mL L-1. The plots were rescored in dense monocultures, displacing much of in particular. Given that around 50% of the September 2001. Differences in counts be- the rich native herbaceous flora. Herbi- native flora at Brixton Street comprises an- tween treatments and years were analysed cide trials were conducted in the Brixton nual or perennial herbs, many of them rare using Kruskal Wallace ANOVA with post Street Wetlands south east of Perth, or restricted taxa (Keighery and Keighery hoc Mann-Whitney U-tests used to de- where it is invading shrublands and 1995), S. bulbifera poses a significant threat termine significance between individual herblands, and impacts of treatments to conservation values of the wetland. treatments. Plant nomenclature gener- on co-occurring native species recorded. Options for control of a weed growing ally follows Paczkowska and Chapman Metsulfuron methyl was trialed at 1.0 g closely among native plants in a wetland (2000). ha-1 and at 2.5 g ha-1 and chlorsulfuron situation are limited. At Brixton Street any Plants of S. bulbifera were also moni- at 2.5 g ha-1. All treatments significantly control program needs to take place over tored over time to determine bulbil and reduced the number of juvenile and a short time at the beginning of October as seed production and methods of spread. adult plants of S. bulbifera. Metsulfuron the wetland begins to dry out and before methyl at 2.5 g ha-1 was the most effective S. bulbifera comes into full flower. Hand Results reducing the number of adult plants per removal at this time is one option and is Sparaxis bulbifera control plot from a mean of 25.4 to 0.4 and the a particularly useful tool for removing All herbicide treatments significantly number of juvenile plants from a mean small isolated populations growing in reduced the number of both adult and ju- of 373.2 to 28.8. relatively undisturbed bushland. How- venile S. bulbifera plants in the trial plots. There were 27 species of native taxa ever hand removal is labour intensive and Metsulfuron methyl at 2.5 g ha-1 was the scattered across the trial plots and only consequently needs to be integrated with most effective followed by chlorsulfuron two taxa, Sowerbaea laxiflora and Phily- a carefully targeted chemical control pro- at 2.5 g ha-1 then metsulfuron methyl at drella drummondii appeared to have been gram. Trials in recent years have indicated 1.0 g ha-1. Metsulfuron methyl at 2.5 g adversely affected by the herbicide treat- that the sulfonylurea group of herbicides ha-1 was significantly more effective than ments. The results however were com- can be quite effective against a number of metsulfuron methyl at 1.0 g ha-1 in control- pounded by the spatial distribution and introduced bulbous and cormous species ling adult plants (Figure 1). Apart from the seasonal nature of the native flora. (Pritchard 1991, Dixon 1996, Pritchard this there were no significant differences Additional information on the reproduc- 1996, Peirce 1998, Meney 1999, Brown et between treatments. Although all treat- tive biology and spread of the weed was al. 2002). Observations and data indicate ments significantly reduced the number of also recorded. that some introduced bulbous or cormous juvenile plants, a mean of 28.8 (±15.08) in- species invading bushland can be control- dividuals per plot still remained following Introduction led with sulfonylurea herbicides with the most effective treatment (Figure 2). The Brixton Street Wetlands lie 20 km minimal impact on the native flora (Dixon south east of Perth at the foot of the 1996, Meney 1999, Moore 1999). Brown et Herbicide impacts on native plants Darling Scarp. A small 19 ha remnant al. (2002) in detailed studies on the con- There were 27 species of native plants on the winter wet flats of Guilford trol of Lachenalia reflexa with metsulfuron recorded from across the trial site; five formation clays, the wetlands have an methyl at 5 g ha-1 in a Banksia woodland shrubs, 14 perennial herbs (seven of those exceedingly diverse flora of 307 native found indications of minimum impact on geophytes) and eight annual herbs. Not taxa (Keighery and Keighery 1995). Spe- co-occurring native species. all species occurred in all plots. Of the five cies rich herblands cover the winter-wet With little published information shrubs, three species remained unchanged claypans, herb rich shrublands the clay on herbicide control of S. bulbifera this or increased in cover across all the herbi- flats and Eucalyptus calophylla woodland study aimed to trial the effectiveness of cide treatment plots they were present in. the higher ground where the soil is well two herbicides, metsulfuron methyl and Seedling recruits of Viminaria juncea and drained (Keighery and Keighery 1991). chlorsulfuron on S. bulbifera and to inves- Pimelia imbricata var. major were observed With this kind of habitat almost entirely tigate the impacts of these herbicides on in some treatment plots. Of the remaining cleared on the Swan Coastal Plain the co-occurring native species in the Brixton two taxa, Verticordia densiflora fluctuated area is of outstanding conservation value Street Wetlands. in cover across the chlorsulfuron plots (Keighery and Keighery 1991, Gibson while Kunzea micrantha subsp. micrantha et al. 1994). One of the major threats to Methods decreased in cover, across both metsul- the native flora and to the plant com- Trial plots (1 m × 1 m) were laid out in furon treatments and fluctuated across munities of the wetlands is invasion and a randomized block design (control and the controls. Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.18(1) 2003 27 30 in the only treatment plots in which it occurred, metsulfuron methyl (1.0 g ha-1) (Table 1). 25 Observations on reproductive biology 20 and spread Observations over the period of our study have provided insights into some aspects 15 of the reproductive biology of S. bulbifera including seed biology, mechanisms of 10 dispersal and patterns of invasion within Mean number of plants the wetland. Although plants produce small bulbils up the stems as they die 5 down at the end of each season, popula- tions appear to spread mainly by seed. Each plant produces around 75 soft thin 0 papery coated seeds in late spring and control metsulfuron methyl metsulfuron methyl chlorsulfuron within the wetlands at least, water ap- 1.0 g per ha 2.5 g per ha pears to be a major dispersal agent. The seed has been observed floating in stand- Figure 1. Mean number (with standard error bars) of mature Sparaxis ing and flowing water and maps reveal bulbifera plants in treatment plots (1 × 1 m) before (dark) and after (pale) populations moving mainly through low herbicide treatments. lying wet areas including creeks and drains. Sheet water flow occurring across the wetland in winter may well explain 600 small populations of S. bulbifera appear- ing in undisturbed bushland. There is also evidence that human activities are playing 500 a role in the spread of the population with dense infestations occurring along walk- ing tracks. 400 Interestingly the seed appears to be relatively short lived in the soil, gener- ally germinating the first season following 300 ripening. Prolific seedling recruitment was observed throughout populations of S. 200 bulbifera before the management program Mean number of plants of number Mean began. One year following removal of all flowering plants from isolated popula- 100 tions little or no seedling recruitment was observed in those populations. 0 Discussion control metsulfuron methyl metsulfuron methyl chlorsulfuron Effectiveness of treatments and impacts 1.0 g per ha 2.5 g per ha on native taxa It is clear that the herbicides tested all ef- Figure 2. Mean number (with standard error bars) of juvenile Sparaxis fectively controlled S. bulbifera at the trial bulbifera plants in treatment plots (1 × 1 m) before (dark) and after (pale) sites, with metsulfuron methyl at 2.5 g -1 herbicide treatments. ha the most effective. The high number of juvenile plants remaining in the treat- ment plots indicates that there will need to be follow up control and any successful Of the 14 perennial herbs present, eight across all plots it occurred in including management strategy will require a com- taxa retained or increased cover within all controls.
Recommended publications
  • Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey

    Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey

    Shire of Dardanup Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey March 2015 Executive summary This report is subject to, and must be read in conjunction with, the limitations set out in Section 1.4 and the assumptions and qualifications contained throughout the Report. The Greater Bunbury Strategy and Structure Plan identified a potential significant urban expansion area located to the east of the Eaton locality and an industrial expansion area in Waterloo, in the Shire of Dardanup. The Shire of Dardanup (the Shire) and the Department of Planning have commenced preparation of District Structure Plans (DSP) for the urban expansion area and the industrial expansion area. The DSP will be informed by several technical studies including flora and fauna surveys. The Shire has commissioned GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) to undertake a flora and fauna survey and reporting for the Project. The Project Area is situated in the locality of Waterloo in the Shire of Dardanup. The Project Area includes the urban development area to the north of the South- west Highway (SWH) and the industrial development area to the south of the SWH. GHD undertook a desktop assessment of the Project Area and a flora and fauna field assessment with the first phase conducted from 13 to 14 August, 2014 and the second phase conducted from 29 to 31 October 2014. The purpose of this assessment was to identify the parts of the Project Area that have high, moderate and low ecological values so that the Shire can develop the DSP in consideration of these ecological values. This assessment identified the biological features of the Project Area and the key results are as follows.
  • Branch Circus Flora and Fauna Survey PDF Document

    Branch Circus Flora and Fauna Survey PDF Document

    FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY Branch Circus and Hammond Road, Success Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS MUNTOC PTY LTD AND 290 Churchill Avenue, SUBIACO WA 6008 SILVERSTONE ASSET PTY LTD PO Box 465, SUBIACO WA 6904 C/O Koltasz Smith T: 618 9382 4744 PO Box 127 F: 618 9382 1177 E: [email protected] BURSWOOD WA 6100 W: www.rpsgroup.com.au Report No: L07263 Version/Date: Rev 0, June 2008 RPS Environment Pty Ltd (ABN 45 108 680 977) Document Set ID: 5546761 Version: 1, Version Date: 31/01/2017 Flora and Vegetation Survey Branch Circus and Hammond Road, Success Document Status Review Format RPS Release Issue Version Purpose of Document Orig Review Date Review Approval Date Draft A Draft For Internal Review KelMcC VanYeo 30.04.08 Draft B Draft For Client Review VanYeo KarGod 14.05.08 SN 30.05.08 Rev 0 Final for Issue VanYeo 10.06.08 DC 12.06.08 B. Hollyock 13.06.08 Disclaimer This document is and shall remain the property of RPS. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised copying or use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. L07263, Rev 0, June 2008 DOCUMENT STATUS / DISCLAIMER Document Set ID: 5546761 Version: 1, Version Date: 31/01/2017 Flora and Vegetation Survey Branch Circus and Hammond Road, Success EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Flora A total of 229 taxa were recorded from the survey area, of which 155 or 68% were native.
  • Plant Tracker 97

    Plant Tracker 97

    Proprietor: Ashley Elliott 230 Tannery Lane Mandurang Victoria 3551 Telephone: (03) 5439 5384 PlantPlant CatalogueCatalogue Facsimile: (03) 5439 3618 E-mail: [email protected] Central & Northern Victoria's Indigenous Nursery Please contact the nursery to confirm stock availablity Non-Local Plants aneura Mulga or Yarran Acacia ramulosa Horse Mulga or Narrow Leaf Mulga Acacia aphylla Acacia redolens Acacia argrophylla Silver Mulga Acacia restiacea Acacia beckleri Barrier Range Wattle Acacia rhigiophylla Dagger-leaved Acacia Acacia cardiophylla Wyalong Wattle Acacia riceana Acacia chinchillensis Acacia rossei Acacia cliftoniana ssp congesta Acacia spectabilis Mudgee Wattle Acacia cognata River Wattle - low form Acacia spinescens Spiny Wattle Acacia cognata River or Bower Wattle Acacia spongilitica Acacia conferta Crowded-leaf Wattle Acacia squamata Bright Sedge Wattle Acacia convenyii Blue Bush Acacia stigmatophylla Acacia cultriformis Knife-leaf Wattle Acacia subcaerulea Acacia cupularis Coastal prostrate Acacia vestita Hairy Wattle Acacia cyclops Round-seeded Acacia Acacia victoriae Bramble Wattle or Elegant Wattle Acacia declinata Acacia wilhelmiana Dwarf Nealie Acacia decora Western Silver Wattle Acacia willdenowiana Leafless Wattle Acacia denticulosa Sandpaper Wattle Acacia caerulescens caerulescens Buchan Blue Acacia drummondii subsp Dwarf Drummond Wattle Acanthocladium dockeri Laura Daisy drummondii Actinodium cunninghamii Albany Daisy or Swamp Daisy Acacia elata Cedar Wattle Actinodium species (prostrate form) Acacia
  • A Revision of the Genus Kunzea (Myrtaceae) I

    A Revision of the Genus Kunzea (Myrtaceae) I

    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 17: 29-106 (1996) A REVISION OF THE GENUS KUNZEA (MYRTACEAE) I. THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SECTION ZEA1VUK H.R. Toelken State Herbarium of South Australia, Botanic Gardens of Adelaide North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 Abstract Within Kunzea sect. Zeanuk, 21 species in three subsections are described and accompanied by discussion on their affinities based on morphological and anatomical evidence. Numerous natural putative hybrids are briefly discussed under the taxon placed first in the hybrid formulae. The paper includes publication of (a) 16 new taxa: sect. Zeanuk, subsect. Arborescentes, subsect. Floridae, subsect. Globosae, K acuminata, K.ciliata, K. cincinnata, K clavata, K. glabrescens, K. newbeyi, K. rostrata, K similis, K. spathulata, K. ericifolia (Sm.)Rchb. ex Heynh. subsp. subulata, K. micrantha Schauer subsp. hirtiflora and subsp. petiolata, and (b) one new combination: K. micrantha Schauer subsp. oligandra (Turcz.)Toelken. Introduction Schauer(1844) distinguished seven species of Kunzea from Western Australia in the first volume on plants collected by Preiss, and described an eighth in the second volume (Schauer 1848). Bentham (1867) rearranged the species and placed most of them in his sect. Eukunzea, which largely agrees with the present sect. Zeanuk except that it is no longer considered to be the typical section of the genus, because, when Kzinzea was conserved (Toelken 1981, 1981a), K capitata, from eastern Australia, was selected as the type of the genus. Reichenbach (1828) in his original use of the genus Kunzea referred to three species. Kunzea capitata was selected as the type in preference to K ericifolia and K corifolia (now K ambigua), because it has at all stages a capitate stigma, the distinguishing character used in the original publication.
  • Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey at the Yalyalup Proposed Mine Area

    Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey at the Yalyalup Proposed Mine Area

    APPENDIX 1: LEVEL 1FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY Report of a Level 1 Flora and Vegetation survey at the Yalyalup Proposed Mine Area Prepared for Doral Mineral Sands February 2016 PO Box 1180 Bunbury WA 6231 9721 1377 | [email protected] Ecoedge Review Version Origin Review release Issue date date approval V1 M. Strang R. Smith 16/02/2016 V2 R. Smith M. Strang 22/02/2016 V3 M. Strang R. Smith 25/02/2016 V4 R. Smith M. Strang 26/02/2016 Final C. Bovell M. Strang M. Strang 02/03/2016 draft (DMS) 2 | P a g e Executive Summary Ecoedge was engaged by Doral Mineral Sands in September 2015 to undertake a Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey of remnant vegetation within the proposed mining area at Yalyalup. The Project Area, which totalled 1,546 ha, contained about 78 ha of remnant native vegetation. The field assessment was carried out on 16th September and 13th and 14th October 2015 The field assessment was carried out on 16th September, 13th and 14th October 2015 and 18th February 2016 in accordance with the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) Guidance Statement 51, “Terrestrial Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment in Western Australia” (EPA, 2004). All areas of remnant native vegetation within the Project Area were visited on foot or by vehicle and data on plant species composition and vegetation condition was collected at 105 sites. The survey resulted in the identification of one hundred and forty-nine taxa of vascular plants, of which 57 taxa (38%) were introduced species.
  • Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey – Bussell Highway, Hutton Rd to Sabina River (32.10 – 43.92 SLK)

    Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey – Bussell Highway, Hutton Rd to Sabina River (32.10 – 43.92 SLK)

    Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey – Bussell Highway, Hutton Rd to Sabina River (32.10 – 43.92 SLK) Prepared for Fulton Hogan Services January 2014 Ecoedge Environmental Pty Ltd t: 61 8 97211377 PO Box 1180 Bunbury, 6231 Western Australia [email protected] ABN: 89 136 929 989 Version Purpose Origin Review Review Ecoedge release Issue date date approval v1 TB R Smith 6 Dec 13 v2 TB, RS R Smith 9 Dec 13 v3 TB, RS R Smith, M 10 Dec 13 Strang v4 TB, RS M Strang 12 Dec 13 v5 TB, RS M Strang 13 Dec 13 v6 TB, RS M Strang 17 Dec 13 Final Released for N 05 Feb 14 M Strang 31 Jan 14 Draft client review McCarthy Final Released to M Strang 05 Feb 14 client 2 | P a g e Executive Summary Fulton Hogan on behalf of Main Roads WA engaged Ecoedge to conduct a Level 1 flora and vegetation assessment consistent with EPA Guidance Statement 51 “Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors: Terrestrial Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment in Western Australia” (EPA, 2004) over approximately 12 km of road reserve along Bussell Highway, between Hutton Road and Sabina River (32.10 – 43.92 SLK). Main Roads WA is conducting investigations as part of a plan to upgrade this section of the Bussell Highway to a dual carriageway by the construction of a second carriageway to the south of the existing road. The field survey part of the flora and vegetation assessment was carried out on 22nd and 23rd October 2013, with a follow-up field visit on 19th December to identify species of Verticordia which had not been in flower at the time of the initial survey.
  • United States Department Of

    United States Department Of

    . i : R A R Y UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INVENTORY No. Washington, D. C. T Issued May, 1930 PLANT MATERIAL INTRODUCED BY THE OFFICE OF FOREIGN PLANT INTRODUCTION, BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY, JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 31, 1929 (NOS. 78509 TO 80018) CONTENTS Page Introductory statement 1 Inventory 3 Index of common and scientific names 61 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT The plant material included in this inventory (Nos. 78509 to 80018) for the period January 1 to March 31, 1929, reflects very largely testing experiments undertaken by the office with ornamental plants in several important genera. In nearly all cases the material recorded was secured by the purchase of seed, and, as is always true of such undertakings, some seed has given no germination, with the result that the experiments are not as advanced as might appear., This is particularly true of the sedums, the primulas, and the gentians, which form conspicuous parts of the inventory. The gardener will also notice the various other ornamentals, including the houseleeks, cyclamen, and ericas for more northern gardens; aloes, agaves, and mesembryanthemums for the South and Southwest, with the possible addition of the very interesting kalanchoes and the gingerlilies. The latter represent a collection purchased from India to see if other species might not be found for general use in the Southern and Gulf States. A preliminary and not altogether successful importation of plants of various daphnes that should be included among our ornamental shrubs shows that repeated efforts should be made to establish these charming plants. Several collections of acacias, banksias, grevilleas, and Ficus species should prove of interest in frost-free regions, particularly on the Pacific coast.
  • Level Two Flora Survey Lot 70 Winthrop Ave College Grove

    Level Two Flora Survey Lot 70 Winthrop Ave College Grove

    Lot 70 Winthrop Avenue Level 2 Flora Survey College Grove City of Bunbury i Disclaimer This document has been published by the City of Bunbury. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith and on the basis that the City of Bunbury, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Information pertaining to this document may be subject to change, and should be checked against any modifications or amendments subsequent to the document’s publication. Document Status Title: Level Two Flora Survey, Lot 70 Winthrop Avenue, College Grove, Bunbury Version Rev 0 Date: 28/04/2015 Ammendments List Version Date Ammendments Prepared by Reviewed by Rev 0 28/04/2015 Final report C. Spencer R. Smith, B. Deeley City of Bunbury i Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Objectives........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Survey Area Location and General Description .............................................................................
  • Roadside Vegetation and Conservation Values in the Shire Of

    Roadside Vegetation and Conservation Values in the Shire Of

    RRooaaddssiiddee VVeeggeettaattiioonn aanndd CCoonnsseerrvvaattiioonn VVaalluueess iinn tthhee SShhiirree ooff DDaannddaarraaggaann Photo by C. Wilson May 2009 Roadside Conservation Committee CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………. 1 PART A: OVERVIEW OF ROADSIDE CONSERVATION................................................... 2 1.0 Why is Roadside Vegetation Important? ……………………………………………… 3 2.0 What are the Threats? …………………………………………………………………. 4 2.1 Lack of Awareness ………………………..………………………………………… 4 2.2 Roadside Clearing ………………………………………………………………….. 4 2.3 Fire …………………………………………………………………………………….5 2.4 Weeds...………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2.5 Salinity…………………………………………………………………………………7 3.0 Legislative Requirements ……………………………………………………………………. 8 4.0 Environmentally Sensitive Areas …………………………………….……………………....9 5.0 Flora Roads…………………………………………………………………………………….10 PART B: THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN DANDARAGAN………….………………….11 1.0 Flora………………………………………………………………………………………….…12 2.0 Declared Rare Flora (DRF)…………………………………………………………….…….12 3.0 Fauna………………………………………………………………………………….………..13 4.0 Remnant Vegetation Cover…………………………………………………….…………….15 PART C: ROADSIDE SURVEYS IN THE SHIRE OF DANDARAGAN ………….…………16 1.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………17 1.1 Methods………………………………………………………………………………17 1.2 Mapping Roadside Conservation Values………………………………………....18 1.3 Roadside Conservation Value Categories………………………………………..18 2.0 Using the Roadside Conservation Value Map (RCV) Map……………………………….20 3.0 Results………………………………………………………………………………………….22 PART
  • Vegetation and Flora of Blackboy Ridge Reserve, Shire of Chittering, Western Australia

    Vegetation and Flora of Blackboy Ridge Reserve, Shire of Chittering, Western Australia

    Vegetation and Flora of Blackboy Ridge Reserve, Shire of Chittering, Western Australia Gregory Keighery and Bronwen Keighery August 2013 Department of Parks and Wildlife Western Australian Conservation Science Centre Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia, 6983 Vegetation and Flora of Blackboy Ridge Reserve, Shire of Chittering, Western Australia By Gregory Keighery and Bronwen Keighery Department of Parks and Wildlife Western Australian Conservation Science Centre Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia, 6983 This publication was prepared as a report for the Department of Parks and Wildlife and Shire of Chittering, initially part of a World Wildlife Bioblitz, held in the Reserve over 24 hours on October 23-24, 2010 at Blackboy Ridge Cover photograph: Wandoo woodland from quadrat BLACK 03, spring 2010. The Reserve is named for the Xanthorrhoea plants that are a feature of the Wandoo woodland understorey on the rises in the Reserve. This Xanthorrhoea is X. acanthostachya a relatively restricted species near its most northern location in the Reserve. The fire earlier in the year has resulted in the Xanthorrhoea plants flowering together. Other shrubs are either regrowing from seed or rootstocks and are currently at low density. Photographs © Bronwen Keighery. 2 SUMMARY Blackboy Ridge Reserve is a small 61 hectare reserve vested in the Shire of Chittering on the southern side of Chittering Road, about 20 kilometres south-east of Bindoon. Quadrat based survey work was performed in the Reserve on the 23rd October 2010 by a group of conservation volunteers as part of a Bioblitz in the Reserve organised by the World Wildlife Fund.
  • Communities for Communities Newsletter Issue 18

    Communities for Communities Newsletter Issue 18

    Communities for Communities Newsletter Issue 18 In this issue: • Ecological Communities Section update • Eucalyptus Woodlands of the Western • Five threatened ecological communities listed Australian Wheatbelt technical workshop under national environment law • Ministerial decision on the Long Lowland • River Murray–Darling to Sea and Macquarie Rivers ecological community Marshes disallowance • Two recovery plans adopted by the Minister • Alpine Sphagnum bogs and associated fens • Conferences and events in 2014 recovery planning Ecological Communities The fact sheet and further information on the ecological community is available at: Section update www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/ • Our new website went live in mid-2013. The site publicshowcommunity.pl?id=126&status=Endangered features a new map function that gives an overview • Conservation Advices have recently been approved for of ecological communities and their locations across four existing listed ecological communities: Australia and answers some common questions. You can – Blue Gum High Forest of the Sydney visit the new website here: Basin Bioregion www.environment.gov.au/topics/biodiversity/threate – Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and ned-species-ecological-communities/threatened-ecolo co-dominant) gical-communities – Swamps of the Fleurieu Peninsula • A new fact sheet on the recently-listed Proteaceae – Turpentine-Ironbark Forest in the Sydney Dominated Kwongkan Shrubland ecological community Basin Bioregion is now available on the Department’s website. The fact sheet outlines: The Conservation Advices are available at: – what an ecological community is www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/ – why it is nationally protected publiclookupcommunities.pl – what the listing aims to achieve – what the listing means for people in the region.
  • Licence Application Environmental Supporting Document

    Licence Application Environmental Supporting Document

    220 Almeria Parade, Upper Swan Licence Application Environmental Supporting Document Prepared for: Thompson & Redwood Pty Ltd September 2017 Submitted to Client Document Prepared Reviewed Admin Revision Reference by by Review Copies Date 2190AB INTERNAL DRAFT CM SS SH 1x electronic 8/8/17 2190AB CLIENT DRAFT CM SS - 1x electronic 8/8/17 2190AB CLIENT FINAL CM SS - 1x electronic 1/9/17 Disclaimer This report is issued in accordance with, and is subject to, the terms of the contract between the Client and 360 Environmental Pty Ltd, including, without limitation, the agreed scope of the report. To the extent permitted by law, 360 Environmental Pty Ltd shall not be liable in contract, tort (including, without limitation, negligence) or otherwise for any use of, or reliance on, parts of this report without taking into account the report in its entirety and all previous and subsequent reports. 360 Environmental Pty Ltd considers the contents of this report to be current as at the date it was produced. This report, including each opinion, conclusion and recommendation it contains, should be considered in the context of the report as a whole. The opinions, conclusions and recommendations in this report are limited by its agreed scope. More extensive, or different, investigation, sampling and testing may have produced different results and therefore different opinions, conclusions and recommendations. Subject to the terms of the contract between the Client and 360 Environmental Pty Ltd, copying, reproducing, disclosing or disseminating parts of this report is prohibited (except to the extent required by law) unless the report is produced in its entirety including this cover page, without the prior written consent of 360 Environmental Pty Ltd.