DOCSLIB.ORG

Lowland Heathland Habitat Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Heathland Habitat Action Plan Lowland Heathland Key associated species Adder Noctule Bilberry Round-leaved Sundew Bog Bush Cricket Serotine Bat Common Lizard Skylark Dartford Warbler Small Copper Green Ribbed Sedge Small Red Damselfly Heath Spotted Orchid Stonechat Hobby Tree Pipit Ling White Sedge Meadow Pipit Woodlark Nightjar Lowland heathland is characterised both by the presence of dwarf ericaceous species such as heather, gorse and cross-leaved heath and by the typical gently undulating landscape forms associated with it. It is generally found below 300 metres in altitude, on nutrient-poor mineral soils. Areas of high quality lowland heathland are not solely composed of vast tracts of heather. They have an ericaceous layer of varied height and structure, with areas of scattered trees and scrub, bare ground, gorse, wet heath, bogs and open water. Lowland heathland is generally considered to be anthropogenic in origin, a product of traditional pastoral activities and the exercising of commoners’ rights such as bracken collecting, turf cutting, grazing, and firewood collection. For the purposes of this document ‘heathland’ will refer to dry heath, wet heath and valley mires where they occur. 1 Current status in UK Biological status 1.1 The lowland heathland that occurs in the British Isles is of a type found (with regional variations) only along the western fringes of continental Europe. The oceanic climate, characterised by mild winters and relatively high rainfall throughout the year, favours the formation of heathland habitats if the required acidic and nutrient-poor substrates are present. The range of species found on these western European oceanic heathlands are unique and can often be very diverse. It is particularly notable for invertebrates, reptiles, birds, bryophytes and lichens. 1.2 Up until the mid-1800s the area of lowland heathland in the UK was still increasing. However, at about this time advances in agricultural 1 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Heathland Habitat Action Plan fertilisers and machinery turned the tide as heathland was converted for agricultural production. 1.3 Extensive tracts of heathland were agriculturally improved or planted for timber. Agricultural improvement and afforestation were joined by urbanisation, cessation of traditional management, mineral extraction and road building as the major causes of loss after 1945. 2 Current status in Buckinghamshire Cover and distribution 2.1 Britain supports approximately 44% of the remaining European heathland resource. In Buckinghamshire there is approx 66 ha of heathland distributed across six SSSIs and one Local Wildlife Site. (BCC habitat mapping 2008 (47ha) and Greensand Trust restoration / creation projects (19ha)) 2.2 Buckinghamshire does not support great expanses of lowland heathland, and thus many of the plants and animals of heathland communities are, and have probably always been, rare in the County. The majority of this habitat occurs at Stoke Common SSSI and Black Park SSSI on glacial gravels on London clay. Additional areas occur at Burnham Beeches and Littleworth Common in the south, and at Rammamere Heath on the Greensand outcrop on the Bucks-Beds border. Additionally, Coombe Hill and Moorend Common SSSIs are included in the Heathland Inventory (EN/RSPB 1996) due to the presence of heather and other calcifuges but they are not strictly heathland sites. 2.3 Outside the SSSIs there are no significant areas (>1 ha) of heathland remaining in Buckinghamshire. Heather, and its associates, occur as small isolated patches along woodland rides at a number of sites both in the south of the County and on the borders with Bedfordshire. Heather also occurs on the Chiltern clay caps, often on commons which are now dominated by bracken and/or secondary woodland. Trends 2.8 There has been a significant decrease in the areas of lowland heathland both nationally and internationally. In England 84% has been lost since 1800 (Natural England 2002). Percentages are not available for losses within Buckinghamshire. Losses have primarily been to plantation woodland, agricultural improvement, natural succession, mineral extraction and development. 3 Current factors affecting the habitat 2 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Heathland Habitat Action Plan Agricultural intensification 3.1 Losses have resulted through agricultural improvements and changes in management practice. These include conversion to arable and re- seeded pasture, use of fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides. Lack of perceived value 3.2 This results in neglect or to alternative land-use such as tree-planting and development. Lack of grazing 3.3 This results in scrub, gorse and bracken invasion causing heather to die and wet areas to dry out. Invasion by wind-born seeds 3.4 Tree species such as birch are brought in as seed, blown from adjacent forested areas. Past management 3.5 Local abundance of purple moor-grass and bracken can indicate past fires. Recreational pressure 3.6 Excessive recreational pressure leads to erosion and localised disturbance. Habitat fragmentation 3.7 Fragmentation of habitats leads to isolation of species and decline in ecological value. 4 Current action Legal status 4.1 All significant areas of lowland heath within Buckinghamshire are protected as SSSIs. Other areas of heath fall within non-statutory Local Wildlife Sites. 4.2 Various legislation regarding common land provides for a degree of protection from development, strengthened by AONB designation in the Chilterns. However, protection against agricultural change is less certain. Management, research and guidance 4.3 Lowland heathland was traditionally grazed and regularly used as common land where gorse, bracken, peat and heather were cut for fodder, fuel, bedding and thatch. Re-introducing grazing is the only sustainable long-term management method to provide the mosaic of vegetation which formerly existed. Alternative methods include cutting, burning (more usually on moorland, only occurring in Buckinghamshire 3 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Heathland Habitat Action Plan as a result of accidental or deliberate fires) and the inevitable scrub clearance. Bracken is often a problem and can be tackled by a number of means including cutting, rolling and chemical control. 4.4 Support for management of lowland heathland is available through Higher Level Environmental Stewardship Rammamere Heath is in the previous Countryside Stewardship Scheme and management has already increased the area of heather. 4.5 Grazing has been introduced at Black Park, Stoke Common and Burnham Beeches. 5 Objectives 5.1 It is important that Habitat Action Plan objectives and actions are considered in conjunction with those in Generic Issues (see Generic Issues). All Generic objectives and actions apply to each individual Habitat Action Plan. 5.2 The Lowland Heathland HAP will contribute to the following UK BAP Targets T1 Maintain the current extent of all existing lowland heathland. This targets represents no net loss of habitat. T2 Maintain the area of lowland heathland currently in favourable condition. T3 Improve the condition of lowland heathland on sites currently in unfavourable condition T4 Increase the extent of lowland heathland by 7,600 ha by 2015 T5 Increase the number of heathland patches over 30 ha from 10% of the total resource to 50% by 2030 6. Biodiversity Opportunity Areas Heathland may be a Priority Habitat in the following Biodiversity Opportunity Areas • Chiltern Escarpment • Greensand Ridge • South Bucks Heaths & Parklands • South Western Commons 4 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Heathland Habitat Action Plan National Target Code Target Action Start End Action location Lead Other Orgs Nume Baseline ric Units T1 - Maintain the current extent of LH1 Maintain extent of all existing lowland heathland - no heathlands net loss of habitat LH1/1 Target heathland sites in Local Wildlife 2007 2010 BMKB X ha Site prioritisation and selection process P LH1/2 Maintain extent of heathland sites in 2007 2010 Aylesbury Vale GST AVDC NE X ha Aylesbury Vale LH1/3 Maintain extent of heathland sites in 2007 2010 Milton Keynes GST MKC X ha Milton Keynes LH1/4 Maintain extent of heathland sites in 2007 2010 South Bucks TBC SBDC NE X ha South Bucks BCC T2 - Maintain the area of lowland LH2 Achieve condition of heathland in favourable condition. heathlands T3 - Restore to favourable condition the area of lowland heathland in unfavourable condition LH2/1 Encourage good management practice Aylesbury VAle GST AVDC NE X ha on the existing heathland in Aylesbury Vale LH2/2 Encourage good management practice 2007 2010 Milton Keynes GST MKC X ha on the existing heathland in Milton Keynes LH2/3 Encourage good management practice 2007 2010 South Bucks TBC SBDC NE X ha on the existing heathlandin South BCC Bucks T4 Increase the extent of lowland LH3 Restore heathland sites heathland T5 Increase the percentage by area of heathland resource within patches greater than xx ha in size LH3/1 Re-establish heathland in Aylesbury 2007 2010 Aylesbury Vale GST AVDC NE X ha Vale LH3/2 Re-establish heathland in Milton 2007 2010 Milton Keynes GST MKC X ha Keynes LH3/3 Re-establish heathland in South Bucks 2007 2010 South Bucks TBC SBDC NE X ha District. BCC 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Newsletter 92

    Newsletter 92

    WYCOMBE and SOUTH BUCKS WILDLIFE NEWS Registered Charity MAY 2020 No: 1075175 Booker Common Woods contain a network of well managed footpaths which are wide enough to prevent social distancing problems during the coronavirus restrictions. Issue 92 Contents include: Wycombe Wildlife News is published 3 times a year to promote the Group and wildlife issues, and inform members and the public Why I love The Chilterns 15 of its activities. Down Memory Lane 16 Edited and produced by Roger Wilding. Proof reading by Frances Wilding. Recording for the BSBI in South Buckinghamshire 17 Content written by Roger Wilding except where shown otherwise. Bird watching at Spade Oak Lake 18 Drawings by Frances Wilding Moth trapping with a difference 18 Photographs by Karen Roberts (moths), the late Maurice Young (Down Memory Lane) and Roger Coronavirus walks 19 Wilding (others). Printed by Greens, Lincoln Rd, High Wycombe. The flight of the Fulmar 22 Views expressed in this newsletter are those of the Sightings submitted by members 23 authors and not necessarily those of the Group. What was this? 24 For the purposes of management of the Group, membership information is held on computer. Editorial s well as reporting the talks and walks in January to April, the May issue of our Anewsletter is normally circulated after our AGM in order to avoid any delay in Wycombe Wildlife informing members of any important issues arising from that meeting. 2020 has of Group is a registered course not been a normal year for anyone, and all our activities following the March charity with the members’ meeting had to be either cancelled or postponed until further notice.
  • Newsletter 90

    Newsletter 90

    WYCOMBE and SOUTH BUCKS WILDLIFE NEWS Registered Charity SEPTEMBER 2019 No: 1075175 It was mentioned in the last newsletter that the rare Yellow Bird’s Nest (Monotropa hypopitys) grows in Lambridge Wood. This photograph of that species was taken there on 28 July 2019. Wycombe Wildlife News is published 3 times Issue 90 a year to promote the Group and wildlife Contents include: issues, and inform members and the public of its activities. Walk to Munces Wood and Hollyhill Wood 51 Visit to Sands Bank LNR 52 Edited and produced by: Roger Wilding Gomm Valley visit Walk at Moorend Common 53 Content written by Roger Wilding except where Visit to Black Park 54 shown otherwise Butterfly walk at Stoke Poges Memorial Gardens 55 Drawings and proof-reading: Frances Wilding Making space for invertebrates 56 A possible interesting new local plant Photographs: Roger Wilding recording project The results of a change of grassland Printed by: Greens, Lincoln Rd, High Wycombe management 57 Garden tweets 58 Views expressed in this newsletter are those of the Other reported wildlife observations around authors and not necessarily those of the Group. our area 59 Your Group needs you 60 For the purposes of management of the Group, membership information is held on computer. Editorial lthough our newsletter is only published three times year, the time for Apreparing another issue always seems to come round so quickly. It has been my practice until now to include the copy date for the next issue on the front Wycombe Wildlife page of each newsletter and I have always waited until that date before writing Group is a registered any reports or articles, in the hope that someone else will submit something for charity with the inclusion.
  • Rolling Farmland

    Rolling Farmland

    LCT 17 DIPSLOPE WITH DRY VALLEYS Constituent LCAs LCA 17.1 Bledlow Ridge LCA 17.2 Bellingdon LCA XX LCT 17 DIPSLOPE WITH DRY VALLEYS KEY CHARACTERISTICS • Large scale landscape comprising alternating dry valley and ridge topography. Dry valleys have cut down into landscape, exposing the chalk, whilst elevated ridges are overlain with clay with flints. • Rolling and undulating topography, with steep slopes contrasting with flatter valley ridges. A smooth and sweeping landform. • Mixed agricultural land use, comprising rough grazing, paddock, pasture and arable farmland. Hedgerows and wooden fencing define boundaries. • Blocks of woodland are dispersed, particularly along the upper slopes of valleys and along ridgelines. • Relatively low density of settlement linearly dispersed along roads, and often spread along ridges. Comprising small villages and individual farmsteads, often with a strong historic character. • Crossed by a comprehensive network of footpaths. Roads are generally rural and quiet, with little traffic and follow linearly along the valley and ridge landform. • Extensive views up and down valleys and from the higher aspect of the ridges, contrasting with areas of woodland, with an intimate and secluded character. • The repetitive undulations of the topography and extensive farmland land cover, contributes to a uniform and simple landscape pattern. Land Use Consultants 101 LCA 17.1 BLEDLOW RIDGE DIPSLOPE WITH DRY VALLEYS LCA in Context LCA 17.1 BLEDLOW RIDGE DIPSLOPE WITH DRY VALLEYS KEY CHARACTERISTICS • A landscape comprising alternating dry valley and ridge topography, which filter out from High Wycombe, and comprise the tributaries of the Wye Valley. • Dry valleys have cut down into landscape, exposing the chalk, whilst elevated ridges remain covered by clay with flints.
  • Species Action Plan for Green-Winged Orchid: (Orchis Morio) in Buckinghamshire

    Species Action Plan for Green-Winged Orchid: (Orchis Morio) in Buckinghamshire

    Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Species Action Plans Species Action Plans National Species Action Plans 8.1 Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report (DETR, 1995) originally listed 416 priority species for which national Species Action Plans would be written. At that time 116 had already been written and 300 remained. In addition, a further 1,250 species were identified as being of ‘conservation concern’. The priority list was reviewed in 1997and in 2007. After the 2007 revision the total number of BAP priority species was set at 1149. This list is available in Biodiversity Reporting and Information Group Report on the Species and Habitat Review 2007. 8.2 The four scientific criteria that were used to select the UK BAP species in the 2007 review were; • International threat • International responsibility & moderate decline in the UK • Marked decline in the UK • Other important factors – where quantitative data on decline are inadequate but there is convincing evidence of extreme threat Local Species Action Plans for Buckinghamshire 8.3 On the publication of the Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes BAP in 2000 it was planned that every species present in Bucks for which there is a national SAP or Conservation Statement, would eventually have a local SAP or Conservation Statement. SAPs would also be written for species which may not be considered a national priority, but which are threatened or declining within the County, such as green- winged orchid. 8.4 The following Plans were produced for species within Buckinghamshire. y Chiltern Gentian y Green-winged Orchid y Striped Lychnis Moth As Latin names were used in the original publication of the action plans for Chiltern gentian, green-winged orchid and striped lychnis moth, they have been retained in the following part of the document.
  • Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

    Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

    Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Version Date Authors Notes 4.0 January 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV Edits and updates from wider consultation group 5.0 May 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections 6.0 November 2009 Mha, GH, AF, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections This document was prepared by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and commissioned by the Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................4 2.0 Selection Criteria for Local Wildlife Sites .....................................................6 3.0 Where does a Local Wildlife Site start and finish? Drawing the line............. 17 4.0 UKBAP Habitat descriptions ………………………………………………………………….19 4.1 Lowland Calcareous Grassland………………………………………………………… 20 4.2 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland................................................................ 23 4.3 Lowland Meadows.............................................................................. 26 4.4 Lowland heathland............................................................................. 29 4.5 Eutrophic Standing Water ................................................................... 32 4.6. Mesotrophic Lakes ............................................................................ 35 4.7
  • Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire

    Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire

    NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Report No. 74/14 ASSESSMENT OF BRITISH SANDAND GRAVEL RESOURCES No. 12 The sand and gravel resources of the country around Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire Description of parts of 7 : 25 000 resource sheets SU 98, SU 99, TO 08 and TO 09 H. C. Squirrell, BSc, PhD with contributions by C. E. Corser, BSc London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1974 The Institute of Geological Sciences was formedby the incorporation of the Geological Surveyof Great Britain and the Museumof Practical Geology with Overseas Geological Surveysand is a constituentbody of the Natural Environment Research Council 0 Crown copyright1974 It is recommended that reference to this report be made in the following form: SQUIRRELL,H. C. 1974. The sand and gravel resources of the country around Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire: Description of parts of 1 : 25 000 resource sheets SU 98, SU 99, TQ 08 and TQ 09. Rep. Znst. Geol. Sci., No.74114. 169 pp. ISBN 0 1 1 8807 10 2 ii PREFACE It has become increasingly clear in recent years that an assessment of resources of many minerals should be undertaken. This is the eleventh report of the Mineral Assessment Unit with was set up in May 1968 to undertake such work. It describes the resources of sand and gravel of 143.5 km2 of country shown on the accompanying 1:25 000 resource sheet. This survey is concerned with assessing sand and gravel resources on a regional scale at the indicated level; the deposits are not outlined completely nor their grade established throughout.
  • Bucks-List-All-Species.Pdf

    Bucks-List-All-Species.Pdf

    Buckinghamshire Bird List Updated in Jul 2020 with 2017 records. 2018 records are available in the Buckinghamshire Bird Club Annual Report. Updated Chart data Feb 2019 Red : Sightings Records Pink : Rare Breeding Records Purple : “Probables” Green : Probable Escapees Navy Blue : Records yet to be Considered by the Bucks Records Committee 1. Red-throated Diver Gavia stellata Rare vagrant. 19 records. View historical photos (for more recent photos see Gallery of members photos) Prior 1910 near Aylesbury Station – shot and presented to County Museum. 1952 Little Marlow GPs – Adult from 27th Oct to 7th Nov. 1970 Hurley – 1 on the River Thames from 11th-31st Mar. 1971 Stanton Low GP – A diver Sp from 25th Feb to 8th Mar was considered to be of this species. 1976 Calvert – 1 from 13th-16th Feb and 22nd Feb. 1978 Hurley – A diver Sp on the River Thames on 19th Feb was considered to be of this species. 1978 Wotton Lakes – 1 from 5th-12th Mar. 1979 Willen – 1 on 14th Mar. 1980 Willen – 1 from 7th-10th Oct 1986 Willen – 1 on 7th Feb. 1987 Weston Turville Res. – A slightly oiled adult from 8th-10th Dec was taken into care but later died. 1988 Calvert – A diver Sp on 17th Nov was considered to be of this species. 1989 Willen – 14 on 2nd Apr, with 6 present just after dawn on on 3rd and 2 remaining until 09:00. This influx may have been caused by snow on the E coast. 1990 Little Marlow GP – Juvenile 16th Dec until 12th Jan 1991. 1994 Stowe School – 1 on 20th Jan.
  • Littleworth Common Sssi

    Littleworth Common Sssi

    LITTLEWORTH COMMON SSSI 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012­2022 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank the many people who contributed to the production of this management plan. Either through the provison of expert advice and information or from the many comments arising from the technical and public consultation exercises. South Bucks District Council Environmental Services Andy McVeigh, BCC Denham Julia Wise, BCC Buckinghamshire Helen Read, City of London UB9 4LH Andy Barnard, City of London www.southbucks.gov.uk Douglas Wallace, Natural England Cllr Bill Lidgate and members of the SBDC 01895 837200 Environment Policy Advisory Group Councillor Jennifer Woolveridge, SBDC Keith Shearman, SBDC Tim McKenzie, SBDC Prepared for South Bucks District Council by; Chris Marchant, SBDC Simon Gray, SBDC The residents of Littleworth Chris Gledhill BSc DMS MTS AIEMA Environmental Director Maps South Bucks District Council www.futuredirections.org.uk LD3 8YT Original Artwork [email protected] Kate Thelwell 01874 638 979 LD3 Photographs Chris Gledhill 2 CONTENTS Introduction 4 Site Description Ownership and designations 7 SSSI site status 7 Present Land Use 7 Physical Features Geology 8 Landscape 9 History and Archaeology 9 Access and Visitors 12 Habitats and Biology Heathland and Woodland 13 Ponds/Open Water 13 Rare Species 14 Protected and Notable Species 15 Species Records 16­17 Objectives and Methodology Our Vision 18 Aims, Objectives, Actions and Targets 18 What we would like to see our work achieving 19 Conservation 21 Ponds 22 Lowland Heathland 23 Native semi­natural woodland 25 People 27 Resource Management 28 Capital Projects 29 Figure 1 Location of Littleworth Common SSSI Part Two: Management Prescriptions 30 Appendices 35 3 INTRODUCTION Littleworth Common Site of Significant Scientific Interest (SSSI) was once part of a much larger area of Heathland landscape covering South Buckinghamshire.
  • A Bibliography of Buckinghamshire Coleoptera

    A Bibliography of Buckinghamshire Coleoptera

    A BIBLIOGRAPHYOF BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COLEOPTERA CHRISTOPHERREID No previous bibliography of Coleoptera The Middle Thumes Naturolist, Ecological exists for this county, probably because none Studies in Milton Keynes, The Grebe, Hsnd- has ever been warranted. However, as a pre- booksfor the ldentification of British Insects, lude to ascertaining and understanding the Eton CollegeNdtural History Society Annual distribution of the coleopterous faunb. of Report. Other referencesare self-evidentor Buckinghamshire, it has been necessary to representless systematicsearching of less undertake a thorough search of the relevant relevantjournais. literature. The resultant list of referencesmay be of use to other entomologists or conserva- The following textsinclude references to the tionists, so it is reproduced here together with county or inferencesto the presenceof species separate indices to the families and localities in Buckinghamshire,while dealing with the mentioned. This format is based on that of beetlefauna of the British Isles: the Zoological Record. Balfour-Browne, F. British Water Beetles. 3 Vols. The Ray Society, London. Vol. I The list, compiled to November 1983, does (1940): Haliplidae, Hygrobiidae, Noteridae, not pretend to be complete, although reason- Dytiscidae(part); Vol. 2 (1950): Dytiscidae ably comprehensivefor the major entomologi- (part),Gyrinidae; Vol. 3 (1958):Hydrophilidae cal journals. I have used the concept of (excludingGeorissus), Hydraenidae. dis- "Greater Buckinghamshire" to delimit the [The tribution of each speciesis illustrated by county, i.e. the Watsonian (24), vice-county Watsonianvice-county.l plus more recently acquired areas. Some referencesto adjacent localities, e.g. Aldbury, Fowler,W.W. and Donisthorpe,H.St.J.K. are also included (indicated by an asterisk). No 1913. The Coleoptera of the British Islands.
  • Appendix 4 Values Recorded at the Stakeholder Workshop By

    Appendix 4 Values Recorded at the Stakeholder Workshop By

    Appendix 4 Values Recorded at the Stakeholder Workshop by Character Area Land Use Consultants Landscape Character Area Type STAKEHOLDER VALUES • Views across the valley from Latimer to Chenies. • Chenies and Latimer Village are quintessentially English and unspoilt with vernacular buildings. • Brick and flint in Chenies village. Timber framed infilling of buildings, with flint represent some of the earliest buildings e.g. Chenies Manor. • Chenies Manor Garden. • Prehistoric sites along chalk streams river valleys, e.g. at Latimer. • Archaeological and historic interest of whole Valley. A1 Chess • Ancient sunken lanes/ holloways with a (13.5) distinctive character, deep and steep form. Illustrate ancient routes and droves for cattle. Winding and work with the topography. • The Chess Valley Walk, a protected route. • Bluebell woods on hillsides. • Biodiversity interest of the chalk river. • Watercress Beds. • Intact river is still largely connected to its Chalk River floodplain habitats. A Valley • Quiet tranquil character despite proximity to built up areas. • Very attractive and varied landscape from floodplain to woodland. • Views of Shardeloes from the train. The first tranquil, beautiful view on the journey north from London. • Shardeloes House listed building and historic park. The importance of its designer and significance in the valley as a pool of cultural history. Views across parkland & lake to country house. • Great Missenden Abbey & Park – attractive historical view from the road is pleasant. A2 Misbourne • Great Missenden where Roald Dahl lived (13.4) Upper and wrote for 36 years. • Historic buildings in Little Missenden, Great Missenden Including Great Missenden Church Street (14th century to 18th century houses. • Great Missenden Abbey (13th century remains and late 18th century house.
  • Moderate Walk Across Pinkneys Green to Hindhay Lane with Views Across to SL6 6QE Nearest Windsor Caste Returning Via Malders Lane

    Moderate Walk Across Pinkneys Green to Hindhay Lane with Views Across to SL6 6QE Nearest Windsor Caste Returning Via Malders Lane

    THE RAMBLERS - EAST BERKS GROUP WALKS PROGRAMME: May – August 2019. In this programme: finish the Ridgeway coach walk and start North Downs Way: 76 walks including 2 Saturday walks, 2 coach trips, 3 evening walks, 3 Bank Holiday weekend walks, 9 leisurely and 8 Strollathons. Contacts: Chairman Phil Smith 07818 443390 EBR Committee EastBerksRamblers.org; go to Home; then “Contacts". Everyone is very welcome to walk with East Berks Ramblers. Under 18s and vulnerable adults must be accompanied by an adult. Please ensure that you are fit enough and have suitable footwear, clothing, food and drink for the walk you intend to join. Leaders may refuse to accept participants who in their opinion are inadequately equipped or unfit. For your own safety please abide by the advice and guidelines issued by organisers and the instructions of the walk leader. Be aware that you walk at your own risk, and that it is your responsibility to behave sensibly and minimise the potential for accidents to occur. Please carry an emergency phone number. If the weather is / has been bad, please check the website to see if the walk has been cancelled or amended. Extra walks, and changes to walks, may be found on the EBR website. Grid Ref. Time Date Walk Description and Details Post code Class Distance Wednesday 10:15 AM Pinkneys Green SU 854 816 01 May Moderate Walk across Pinkneys Green to Hindhay Lane with views across to SL6 6QE nearest Windsor Caste returning via Malders lane. Start: Pinkneys Green NT car park. Undulating Leader: Christine B and Val S.
  • Opportunity Mapping Local Consultation Procedure

    Opportunity Mapping Local Consultation Procedure

    South Bucks Heaths and Parklands Biodiversity Opportunity Area Statement Area Coverage 5662 ha Number of Local wildlife sites 15 Designated Sites SSSI 4 BAP Habitat Lowland Mixed Deciduous Woodland 251ha Lowland Meadow 5.5 ha Lowland Dry Acid Grassland 1 ha Wet Woodland 19 ha Lowland Calcareous Grassland 2 ha Lowland Heath 65 ha Lowland Beech & Yew Woodland 162 ha Lowland Fens 3.5 ha This area covers a large proportion of South Bucks District and contains a central core of commons, heathland and wood pasture (including Burnham Beeches ,Stoke Common and Black Park This BOA connects with Colne Valley and Thames Valley Joint Character Thames Valley Area Landscape Agricultural wooded Types Geology Mostly mudstone overlain by sands and gravels. Small areas around Dorney Wood and Cliveden and in the Alderbourne Valley are chalk. Topography A generally flat plateau cut in the centre by the Alderbourne Valley. The areas to the south of Stoke Poges and to the east of Black Park are lower (by around 40m) and flatter and form part of the ancient river terraces of the Thames and Colne. Biodiversity This area contains a complex mosaic of many BAP priority habitats. Heathland – The key heathland sites are Stoke Common, Black Park and Burnham Beeches. However a much wider area was once heathland and relict habitat can still be found in some areas. Acid Grassland – The key acid grassland sites are as per heathland. Calcareous Grassland – There is one calcareous grassland site at Clivenden Fen – There are wet flushes in the west of the area, at Burnham Beeches and at Black Park Hedgerows – There are several areas with concentrations of pre-18th century enclosures where there are species rich hedges.