<<

A Guide to Gender, Rights and

Contents Women Challenging Water Privatization 2 Extracting the Global Issues 3 Focus: Women in Action 4 Making Waves 10 12

Anna Grossman Nadia Johnson Gretchen Sidhu EDITORS Doris Mpoumou Rebecca Pearl CONTRIBUTORS Bryony Halpin Sara Schivazappa RESEARCHERS

Public Citizen CASE STUDIES

Joan Ross Frankson MANAGING EDITOR

Shannon Hayes EDITORIAL ASSISTANT

Leslie Shaffer COPY EDITOR The Handy Design Company DESIGN

Printed on recycled, chlorine-free paper by Astoria Graphics, Inc. Copyright © November 2003 ISBN: 0-9746651-0-x

Public Citizen is a non-profit research, lobbying and litigation organiza- Women’s Environment & Development Organization (WEDO) tion that advocates for consumer protection and for government and is an international advocacy organization that seeks to increase the corporate accountability. Public Citizen’s Water-For-All Campaign is power of women worldwide as policymakers at all levels in govern- working to protect universal access to clean and affordable ments, institutions and forums to achieve economic and social justice, by keeping it in public hands. a healthy and peaceful planet, and human rights for all.

WEDO acknowledges the generous funding from the Water Unit of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Netherlands that made this publication Women’s Environment & Development Organization possible. The views and opinions expressed in this report do not necessar- 355 Lexington Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10017 ily reflect those of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Netherlands. Tel: 212-973-0325; Fax: 212-973-0335 Women Challenging Water Privatization ater is a vital and human right. But access to potable water is becoming increasingly difficult. When water is W scarce, polluted, or unaffordable, women suffer most acutely. As economic providers, caregivers, and household managers, women are responsible for ensuring that their families have water for daily living. Every day, many women and girls walk or travel long distances istries, forming local women’s associations, and organizing to bring water to their families, often at the expense of educa- marches, pickets, public education campaigns, and direct actions. tion, income generating activities, cultural and political involve- WEDO is an international advocacy organization that seeks ment, and rest and recreation. Despite this, women’s central role to increase the power of women worldwide as decision-makers in management is often ignored. at all levels to achieve economic and social justice, democratic Privatization is one aspect of the world’s water crisis that is hav- governance, and sustainable development. We developed this ing a deeply negative impact on the livelihoods of women. publication to advance awareness of the gendered nature of Increasingly, water resources management in countries across the water privatization and its impact on women. Public Citizen, a globe is being determined by policies of the international financial non-profit research, lobbying and litigation organization that and trade institutions—the , International Monetary advocates for consumer protection and for government and cor- Fund (IMF), and World Trade Organization (WTO). More than porate accountability, provided valuable case studies that illus- two decades ago, the World Bank and IMF began to prescribe a trate the impact of water privatization on women and the ways new policy package called programs (SAPs) in which women have organized against it. to indebted countries in exchange for loan financing. In 2002, WEDO identified women’s access to and control of SAPs required governments to, among other measures, water as a key issue in our work, and as an area in critical need of reduce or eliminate public services, open local markets to for- an engendered approach in global policy arenas. While the most eign interests, and sell off previously state-owned operations to direct challenges to water privatization are against governments private investors, a process known as privatization. These poli- and corporations at the local and national level, the demand for cies have expanded through the years, and have become a major privatization often comes from global institutions. Thus, WEDO aspect of ‘trade-related’ policy at the WTO. As governments is working at the global level to challenge the policy environment. relinquish control of domestic water systems under pressure Our aim is to pressure global institutions that have direct influence from international institutions and regional banks and trade on national decision-making on vital issues such as privatization, agreements, transnational corporations (TNCs) are gaining and to strengthen the United Nations to become the primary glob- unprecedented access to national and local water supplies. Thus, al forum for enforcing human rights, sustainability, and peace. a few major water corporations such as Veolia, RME/Thames While much has been written on water privatization, there is Water, and Suez are increasingly controlling water access in a need to link this discourse to the actual impact on women. many parts of the world. This publication is a resource guide for policymakers, and Privatization and other interrelated components of neoliber- human rights, environmental, and economic and gender justice al economic policies, such as free trade and government deregu- advocates working on global policy, to examine the impact that lation, have severely impacted many countries—exacerbating the privatization of goods and services like water has on the the gap between the rich and poor, worsening social and eco- livelihoods of women, particularly poor women. nomic inequities, and intensifying imbalances in productivity, Section one presents extracts from a variety of sources that resource flows, and distribution of goods and services. The pri- highlight the critical issues related to water privatization and vatization of water, and indeed all other natural resources, is women, including: water as a human right, public versus private increasingly infringing on people’s rights and livelihoods around goods, gender roles and inequities, global policy trends, and gov- the world, most severely on poor women and girls. Water priva- ernance issues. Excerpts from case studies, compiled by Public tization perpetuates gender inequalities by relying on tradition- Citizen, detail women’s struggles for clean, accessible water in al gender roles that have made women and girls responsible for Kenya, Uruguay, Philippines, Egypt, South Africa and the United and the main suppliers of water to their families and households. States. Expanded versions of these and other case studies are avail- Thus, over many years women have disproportionately expe- able on WEDO and Public Citizen websites (www.wedo.org, rienced the burdens of privatization policies in the form of enor- www.wateractivist.org). Section two presents different arenas for mous price hikes, water cut-offs, deteriorating , and civic engagement. This includes actions at the local level and entry health and hazards. In response, women have been points for advocacy on privatization issues in strategic global central to the struggle against the sale of public water services to forums. Finally, a list of resources is provided to obtain addition- TNCs, through lobbying local authorities and national min- al information, reach out to others and get involved.

2 Diverting the Flow Extracting the Global Issues The Human Right to Water access, reforms must also take into consideration the gender inequities and the power relations at the family, community, and Water is fundamental to all forms of and state levels. must be protected as a common resource, Amenga-Etego, Rudolf.“Water Privatization in Ghana: Women’s Rights Under Siege.” Integrated Social and Development Centre. Accra, Ghana. Page 1. public good and human right. Water has been www.isodec.org.gh. recognized as a human right in numerous international treaties and declarations, as well The increase of the global degradation of ecosystems, the as by the UN Committee on Economic, Social excessive consumption of water, contamination and saliniza- and Cultural Rights in November 2002. The tion of water-bearings, and dams, along with the human right to water is essential for achieving impact of extreme poverty which has been worsened by priva- tization, are contributing factors to an environmental catastro- other human rights and international develop- phe. This has had profound effects on the availability of drink- ment commitments in critical areas such as ing water and, consequently, has led to the violation of the gender equality, sustainable development, right to life, safety, , health and education of billions of and poverty eradication. human beings. Obando, Ana Elena. Women and Water Privatization, November 2003, www.whrnet.org/docs/issue-water.html. Water is a limited natural resource and a public good fundamen- tal for life and health. The human right to water is indispensa- Plundering Public Goods ble for leading a life in human dignity. It is a prerequisite for the realization of other human rights. As a public good, water must be managed United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. for social needs and environmental sustain- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). ability rather than for short-term profit. E/C.12/2002/11. General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water. November 26, 2002. Page 1. www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf. When public necessities become private commodities, people who are already margin- The right to water is clearly established under international alized become more vulnerable to the whims human rights law: all people have the right of access to the of the market. Corporate control can entrench amount of water required to sustain life and fulfill basic needs. The right to water has been identified as a component of the existing inequalities and endanger the quality right to housing, the right to the highest attainable standard of of life—and even survival—of poor people, health, and the right to food under the International Covenant particularly women. As pollution degrades on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the far more swiftly than nature world’s most important social and economic rights treaty. UNIFEM.“Promoting and Protecting Women’s Right to Water in the Context can replenish it, the shrinking of and Feminized Poverty.” New York. Page 7. www.unifem.org. makes privatization an even more contentious and urgent political issue. With respect to the right to water, States parties have a special obligation to provide those who do not have sufficient means Essential services are generally viewed as public goods. Unlike with the necessary water and water facilities and to prevent any private goods, all people benefit from universal access to public discrimination on internationally prohibited grounds in the goods, regardless of how much they consume. For example, provision of water and water services. … States parties should clean water and accessible health care reduce the overall inci- take steps to ensure that women are not excluded from decision- dence of illness. making processes concerning water resources and entitlement. Kessler, Tim.“From Social Contract to Private Contracts: the Privatization of The disproportionate burden women bear in the collection of Health, Education and Basic Infrastructure.” Social Watch Report 2003: The water should be alleviated. Poor and the Market. Montevideo, Uruguay. Page 11. www.socwatch.org/uy. United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). E/C.12/2002/11. General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water. November 26, In many countries fresh-water resources are still owned by the 2002. Page 7. www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf. state; but these public rights are increasingly being assigned to private interests, usually through licensing and permitting The ultimate objective should be to achieve universal access. regimes. …The World Bank is spearheading the promotion of This means that water must be identified primarily as a public private water rights, water licensing, and in good and a human right and not simply as a commodity to be developing countries, as part of an international program to traded in the open market. In determining the mechanisms of define water as an economic rather than social good. [A] second

Diverting the Flow 3 strategic growth offensive is the delivery of water services. To Women Bear The Impact date, much of this growth has been accomplished by corporate mergers and acquisitions of private utilities and water compa- As the majority of the world’s poor, women nies. For example, the world’s largest water corporation, are significantly affected when water is Generale des Eaux, a subsidiary of Vivendi, is a conglomeration privatized. Inadequate access to water greatly of more than 3,000 companies around the world. increases women’s burdens as caregivers and Shrybman, Steven.“Thirst for Control: New Rules in the Global Water Grab.” Council of Canadians. January 2002. Pages 23-24. www.canadians.org/ household and economic providers, thereby documents/campaigns-tfc.pdf. exacerbating gender inequity. Human rights advocates recognize water as a critical The privatization of water is a radical new social experiment. component of gender equality and women’s Most major water are less than a decade old, empowerment, as well as environmental but already it appears clear that they follow the pattern of security and poverty eradication. privatization in other service sectors—no commitment to expanded access to low-income consumers, inequity in the quality of service based on the ability to pay, service cut-offs, Private property regimes tend to perpetuate and can even inten- weak regulatory oversight, and lack of accountability to local sify gender inequalities. Women are often marginalized in mon- consumer needs. etary economy, and thus suffer when a price is put on water. Grusky, Sara.“Profit Streams: The World Bank and Greedy Global Water Willingness- to-pay is not the same as the ability-to-pay, such Companies.” Public Citizen. September 2002. Pages 9-10. www.citizen.org. assessments do not take into account the choices that poor women must make. Domestic or “reproductive” uses of water does not generate income directly, so benefits are not captured As the planet dries up and water supplies are bought up by pri- in traditional economic indicators. vate interests, we have begun moving into a new economic con- Liu, Julian.“Human Rights and Gender Inequity in Water Resource figuration, where sprawling cities and agribusiness operations Management.” Centre for Economic & Social Rights. Page 6-7. www.cesr.org. thrive and the wells of private citizens and local farmers run dry. ...What lies ahead is a world where resources are not conserved, Women have been the most adversely affected by these increas- but hoarded, to raise prices and enhance corporate profits and es [in water prices]. There are several reasons that account for where military conflicts could arise over in places this. First and foremost is the question of gender inequity and like the Mexican Valley and the Middle East. It’s a world where the asymmetrical power relations that deprive women of everything will be for sale. resources while assigning them the most menial, difficult and Barlow, Maude and Clarke, Tony. Blue Gold: the Fight to Stop the Corporate unrewarding jobs and roles. In most cases power at the house- Theft of the World’s Water. The New Press. New York. 2002. Page 76. hold level is concentrated in the hands of men. Men care little about water bills and how and where the water is obtained Amenga-Etego, Rudolf.“Water Privatization in Ghana: Women’s Rights Under Siege.” Integrated Social and Development Centre. ACCRA-Ghana. Page 5. www.isodec.org.gh

Kenya: Whether Public or Private, $75 million Privatization and Private Sector are believed to be responsible for most chil- Policies Overlook Women Development Project for Kenya is in the dren’s deaths. World Bank pipeline and it has water priva- While women play a critical role in the In Kenya, a 1999 water policy act recognized tization as a core objective. water sector, they are rarely integrated into water as a human right, and made the gov- For now, the water systems remain pub- actual practice or policy. Some women are ernment fully responsible for ensuring licly owned. In cities, reliability varies, taking matters into their own hands, form- every citizen access. But a new policy in but the quality of piped water is generally ing local associations that work with 2002 defined water as an “economic good. Overall, however, about 50 per- municipalities to ensure that piped-water good” and called upon consumers cent of the population in both rural points are established within their reach. to pay for it. The administration of and urban areas lack clean water. They have mobilized neighborhoods, President Mwai Kibaki, which is They must purchase it from ven- municipalities and other partners to build trying to curry favor with interna- dors, paying more than 30 times water tanks, and have generated funds tional institutions to increase aid the price of piped supplies. Some locally to pay for them. flows, has also supported private sector draw water from polluted sources, such as —Annabell Waititu, participation in the water system. A U.S wells and springs. Water-borne-diseases Environment Liaison Centre International

4 Diverting the Flow Water for Nature is poorly represented in the corridors of power. education. … As the traditional water bearers and custodians of As a result, wetlands, floodplains and coastal ecosystems are in family health, women shoulder a huge burden in coping with danger of irreversible degradation. When that happens, there is the lack of basic sanitation services. a gender disparity in the consequences. It is poor families who Klöpfer, Carsten.“Water Privatization from a Gender Perspective.” draw most heavily on “common property” resources like , Heinrich Böll Foundation. June 2003. Page 10. www.boell.org. , water bodies and inshore fishing grounds. Women are usually the ones responsible for providing food and water for Low income women facing time constraints are obliged to the household and suffer disproportionately when common accept lower quality water—contaminated ground water nor- resources are degraded. mally not used for consumption—threatening family health and Gender and Water Development Report 2003, Gender and Water Alliance, wellness. This is a particularly frightening alternative given that The Netherlands. Page 10. www.genderandwateralliance.org. 80% of all illnesses are transmitted by contaminated water. Water related illnesses drain limited household budgets as funds When women’s access to water is compromised, a number of are diverted for medical expenses and/or for purchase of water at negative health, safety and empowerment impacts result. high costs. Girls may be forced to drop out of school to assist in Women and children, often girl children, travel greater distances collecting water or as a result of reduced availability of water from home in search of water sources, increasing restrictions on supplies for sanitation and personal hygiene. women’s already overburdened schedules and limiting time UNIFEM.“Promoting and Protecting Women’s Right to Water in the Context available for other activities, including growing and preparing of Globalization and Feminized Poverty.” New York. Page 2. www.unifem.org. food and income generating work. UNIFEM.“Promoting and Protecting Women’s Right to Water in the Context Trekking distances to access water or sanitation places women in of Globalization and Feminized Poverty.” New York. Page 1. www.unifem.org. danger of being victims of physical violence. Women also suffer structural or indirect violence when unjust political and eco- Unfortunately, more money and resources are spent in treating nomic factors result in reduced quality of life or life expectancy water-related sickness than on sanitation provision and hygiene through lack of access to basic needs, particularly water. UNIFEM.“Promoting and Protecting Women’s Right to Water in the Context of Globalization and Feminized Poverty.” New York. Page 2. www.unifem.org.

Uruguay: Privatization their own artesian wells. This entails some district of San Antonio, which is primarily With Protest degree of insecurity, since the legalities of run by women and has provided nearly 10 “self-supply” are unclear. Others chose to years of valuable community work, success- In the region of Maldonado, water service develop a system of , fully lobbied the local authorities to main- was not considered a problem until it was with women primarily responsible for tain the community tap. Now the stand- privatized in a process that faced popular the maintenance and cleaning of the pipe in the neighborhood not only resistance, lacked any formal public con- rainwater tanks. Women in general supplies water to families there, sultation, and was supported only by the have led these initiatives, and have but also to neighbors from other hotel industry, large landowners and big taken charge when supplies fall districts where standpipes have government. When water and municipal short and must be brought in from been removed or household water authorities made the decision to privatize, other places. connections cut off due to the inability they followed a policy shaped by agree- In the poorer areas of Maldonado, to pay the high water rates. A lack of ments with international financial institu- neighborhood organizations have fought resources, however, means the quality of tions, such as the IMF. to defend community standpipes. The the service has been very low. Two companies took part in the privati- standpipes were installed in different Maldonado’s experiences illustrate zation: Uragua, a subsidiary of the Spanish zones around the country by the public the importance of incorporating the company Aguas de Bilbao, in the city of water and sanitation ministry to assure needs of people most directly affected by Maldonado, and Aguas de la Costa, a sub- that potable water was available in areas water management changes before plan- sidiary of the multinational Suez, in the that lacked piped services to households. ning privatization. Water management beach area along the Atlantic coast. The cost was assumed by the municipali- policies must address the issue of ensur- Reactions to the privatization have differed. ties. When the private companies stepped ing equal access as well as sustainable use In the more prosperous beach zone, in, their first move was to eliminate the of this resource. complaints have centered on the quality standpipes, a strategy designed to make —Juan Berhau, Dirigentes de la and price of the water. The motto is: people pay high fees for a household con- Federación de Funcionarios de las Obras “Water Yes, Robbery No!” nection. Citizens unable to pay would lose Sanitarias del Estado (FFOSE), and Rather than protesting the loss of the access to water. Carlos Santos, Friends of the Earth standpipes, residents decided to excavate The neighborhood commission of the Uruguay (REDES)

Diverting the Flow 5 Policy Puts Profit Before People In general, the privatization initiatives are the legacy of the struc- tural adjustment policies adopted and implemented by the In the past two decades, many areas of deci- government under the aegis of the World Bank and the sion-making have moved from the national to International Monetary Fund. the global level. Privatization of services and Amenga-Etego, Rudolf,“Water Privatization in Ghana: Women’s Rights Under Siege.” Integrated Social and Development Centre. Accra, Ghana. Page 2. natural resources is often demanded by the www.isodec.org.gh. World Bank, IMF,WTO, and regional banks and trade agreements. These policies are being The Dublin Principles, generated at the 1992 Dublin carried out in nations around the world based Conference on Water and the Environment, recognize that fresh on lop-sided conditionalities that give prece- water is a finite and valuable resource, essential to sustain life, development and the environment. But they also declare that dence to private profit, often at the expense of water has an economic value in all its competing uses, and people’s needs, environmental sustainability should therefore be recognized as an economic good. and democratic governance. Shrybman, Steven.“Thirst for Control: New Rules in the Global Water Grab.” Council of Canadians. January 2002. Page 26. www.canadians.org.

[The international financial institutions] and the WTO share a common framework and a common approach to global eco- Governments will sell off their rights to this valuable commodi- nomic governance. The dominant characteristics of this frame- ty for cheap; for reduced debt payments; for the promise of work are: liberalization and deregulation of domestic market access; and for tied aid. And ultimately, in the future markets; privatization and commercialization of all spheres of citizens will have to purchase water at a heavy price, if they can, human activities and the bringing of these activities under the from TNCs and the North if we allow this process to continue. control of the private sector, preferably foreign capital, in devel- Williams, Mariama.“IMF-World Bank-WTO Coherence: The Implications for Water Privatisation.” Presentation for GERA/TWN Public Forum. Accra, oping countries; [a] limited non economic management role for Ghana. November 27, 2002. Page 2. www.genderandtrade.net/WTO/ government; [and the] free and unregulated flow of goods, serv- Coherence_Williams.pdf. and capital across national borders. Williams, Mariama.“IMF-World Bank-WTO Coherence: the Implications for Water Privatization.” Presentation for GERA/TWN Public Forum. Accra, Non-compliance with conditions in IMF loans can influence Ghana. November 27, 2002. Page 2-3. www.genderandtrade.net/WTO/ not only the flows of IMF lending, but the IMF’s “seal of Coherence_Williams.pdf. approval” which regulates access to multilateral credit, bilateral

“As the primary collectors of water throughout the world, women must be recognized as major stakeholders in the decision-making process.”

Philippines: Advocating for island itself, that give five hours of prioritize public spending on basic Water Over National Debt water service to 264 households. social services over national debt Given this condition, 30 households appropriation, which consumes 48 Water access for the people of Zaragosa are clustered to one communal faucet percent of the national budget. Island depends on the ebb of the tide. At averaging 10 minutes of water collection The Rural Women’s Congress also advo- high tide, when the crossing to the mainland time per household only. This is why the cated the active participation of women in is deep enough, a group of mostly women people still prefer to paddle to the main- water supply development projects—most and children paddle their small boats to a to get their share of water. do not recognize them as stakeholders. Yet single communal faucet provided by the Scenes like this repeat themselves across women are the primary collectors of water. municipal government.They collect water in the Philippines, which is why the recently Increasing their participation, with appro- plastic containers, bathe and do laundry. concluded National Rural Women’s Con- priate capability building, is one way to Many spend two hours per day paddling gress, attended by 280 participants from ensure that projects take root and last over back and forth, on top of considerable time rural women’s organizations, called for the long term. waiting for their turn at the tap. increased access to water services as a —Agnes Balota, There are nine communal faucets on the human right. It asked the government to Tambuyog Development Center

6 Diverting the Flow credit and aid, and private sector investment flows. Eager, and Under the “National Treatment” provisions of NAFTA and sometimes desperate for external loans, developing country GATS, signatory governments who privatize municipal water governments often adopt IMF and World Bank policy prescrip- services will be obliged to permit competitive bids from transna- tions in secret negotiations behind closed doors without the tional water-service corporations. Similarly, once a permit is knowledge or consent of citizens. granted to a domestic company to export water for commercial Grusky, Sara.“Profit Streams: The World Bank and Greedy Global Water purposes, foreign corporations will have the right to set up oper- Companies.” Public Citizen. September 2002. Page 11. www.citizen.org/ ations in the host country. documents/ProfitStreams-World%20Bank.pdf. Barlow, Maude and Clarke, Tony.“Who Owns Water?”The Nation. August 15, 2002. www.thenation.com. Many World Bank loans require governments to replace public funding of the water utility with a policy promoting full cost The Democracy Deficit recovery. Full cost recovery refers to collecting fees from the Governments are ultimately responsible for consumer for the full cost of the operation and maintenance of the water utility service. … In 2001, World Bank water and san- the provision of basic human needs. However, itation loans with increased cost recovery measures made up decision-making today mainly heeds global more than 80% of the approved loans. In contrast, it is impor- market trends and private interests. Shifting tant to note that public funding of water and sanitation services responsibility from local governments to for- is standard practice in the United States. ...Public funding, not full cost recovery, will ensure universal access to potable water. eign investors is problematic, as profits often Grusky, Sara.“Profit Streams: The World Bank and Greedy Global supercede human needs and rights. Institutions Water Companies.” Public Citizen. September 2002. Pages 6, 8. creating and implementing new policies that www.citizen.org/documents/ProfitStreams-World%20Bank.pdf. favor privatization of public services remain The Johannesburg Plan of Implementation calls on governments largely unaccountable to the people they are to: “Mobilize international and domestic financial resources at supposed to benefit. As water is fundamental all levels, transfer technology, promote best practice and support to life, water management must be democratic capacity-building for water and sanitation infrastructure and and transparent, and represent the needs of services development, ensuring that such infrastructure and services meet the needs of the poor and are gender-sensitive.” the people—none more important than WEDO Gender Analysis of the WSSD Plan of Implementation. WEDO. women, who carry out 80 percent of water- New York. September 2002. www.wedo.org/sus_dev/analysis2.htm. related work throughout the world.

The WTO’s General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) …The global trend towards the privatization of what have will “lock in” privatization and make it practically irreversible traditionally been public services reduces the democratic while, at the same time, constraining the capacity of the govern- involvement of both citizens and governments in water manage- ment to regulate the market in the public interest. The GATS strikes at the heart of democracy in Southern and Northern ment decisions. Unlike government, corporations have minimal countries alike. disclosure requirements in most countries; as a result, the Amenga-Etego, Rudolf.“Water Privatization in Ghana: Women’s Rights public’s access to information from corporations is restricted. Under Siege.” Integrated Social and Development Centre. Accra, Ghana. Page 2. www.isodec.org.gh.

Egypt: Poor Quality, Limited allowed private distribution. and children are usually the last to Knowledge and Threats to Health Vendors sell water at prices five to seek care because they lack trans- 10 times higher than the govern- portation. With a 52 percent illiter- In Cairo and other major cities in Egypt, ment utilities charge, and it is deliv- acy rate, women also tend to be about 95 percent of residents receive treat- ered in unhygienic tankers. poorly informed about health issues. ed drinking water. In rural areas, water runs Women bear the brunt of the impact of In response to widening disparities in only 50-70 percent of the time due to failed the shortfalls and poor quality, because both supply and price of water, women’s treatment units and excessive pumping for they manage most household tasks that organizations have taken the issue to the . Further, in both rural and urban require water, from cooking to cleaning. highest administrative levels in the areas the water is often polluted with agri- The burden also extends to healthcare. Due Ministry of Housing and the Ministry of cultural, industrial and domestic waste. to the poor water quality, bacterial, viral Water Resources and Public Works. Current government policy discourages and parasitic diseases often strike children However, much more needs to be done to water privatization. But on the outskirts of in rural areas, as well as those who use con- correct the imbalances. many urban areas, which are not served by taminated canals and drains. Although —Samia Galal Saad, the public system, the government has some health services are available, women Alexandria University

Diverting the Flow 7 The public is thus unable to ensure that the resource is potable When governments transfer control over their water system to pri- and that it is being managed in a sustainable, efficient manner. vate companies, the loss of internal skills and expertise may be irre- Furthermore, the nature of the is such that only versible, or nearly so. Many contracts are long term—for as much one corporation can be involved in the management of water in as 10 to 20 years. Management expertise, engineering knowledge, a given region. Once a private monopoly is established it is and other assets in the public domain may be lost for good. extremely difficult to reverse it. …The concentration of power in Gleick, Peter H. et. al.“The New Economy of Water: The Risks and Benefits of the hands of a single corporation and the inability of governments Globalization and Privatization of .” Pacific Institute. February 2002. Page 39. www.pacinst.org. to reclaim management of water services allow corporations to impose their interests on governments, thus compromising gov- ernments’ ability to govern based on the interests of the public. At no time were the options published in any newspaper or Yaron, Gil.“The Final Frontier: A Working Paper on the Big 10 Global Water publicly debated over the radio or in forums that included per- Corporations and the Privatization and Corporation of the World’s Last sons with diverse viewpoints. The public has never been Public Resource.” Polaris Institute. 2000. Page 3. www.polarisinstitute.org. informed of the terms of the contract bidding process, or the background and qualifications of the companies. The people on Responsible management of the environment by governments whose behalf the contracts are being worked out have been left through laws and regulations is frequently viewed as a liability in the dark. To marginalize local influence, the World Bank that decreases international competitiveness. ...In a globally funds the office promoting privatization on behalf of the gov- competitive economic climate, transnational corporations will ernment of Ghana, the Water Sector Restructuring Secretariat threaten to withdraw their investment plans in a given country (WSRS), which is staffed by individuals who are remunerated unless the government changes the environmental regulation in at private, not public, sector salary scales. Bilateral donors are question. As a result, many environmental regulations have also bankrolling the Secretariat. either been overturned or left unenforced while new ecological Amenga-Etego, Rudolf.“Water Privatization in Ghana: Women’s Rights Under safeguards have been prevented from seeing the light of day. Siege.” Integrated Social and Development Centre. Accra, Ghana. Page 3. www.isodec.org.gh. Barlow, Maude and Clarke, Tony. Blue Gold: the Fight to Stop the Corporate Theft of the World’s Water. The New Press. New York. 2002. Page 96.

South Africa: The Struggle for payment of bills, suggesting that residents While both men and women in Orange Water, The Struggle for Life should contact the private water provider. Farm have been adversely affected by the But Johannesburg Water Company (JOWCO) government’s embrace of neo-liberalism, Orange Farm, a township just 45 kilometers is owned by the council; in 2001, it entered women have faced additional problems as south of Johannesburg, is home to approxi- into a water management consortium, with traditional household nurturers. This may mately 500,000 people. Begun as an infor- Suez Lyonnaise as a major partner. be why they have adopted some of the mal settlement in 1987 when people started In 2002, JOWCO told residents in one most radical tactics in opposing the priva- squatting on vacant farmland due to a hous- Orange Farm extension that it would pro- tization of natural resources. They fear ing crisis and political violence, it became a vide proper sewer and sanitation systems cholera outbreaks, as happened in township in 1997,in hopes of improved infra- for every household that paid 500 Alexandra and KwaZulu Natal in structure for a population considered the rand, and the company began to 2000 and 2001, when higher user ‘poorest of the poor’. Instead, despite the install pre-paid water meters. In fees caused people unable to pay struggles of the people of Orange Farm, the protest, residents, mainly women, to consume contaminated water. township has inadequate services at high took to the streets. A massive cam- Over 250 died. Women also worry costs.The people continue to fight for decent paign against JOWCO was launched, that care of the sick, many of whom and affordable housing, clean water and and the Orange Farm Water Crisis have HIV, and the elderly will be compro- sanitation, and electricity. Women have Committee was born. Residents gave mean- mised, and that their large families will not played a central role in these struggles, par- ing to the graffiti sprayed all over the area: be able to survive on the free six kiloliters ticularly over water, where they have “Break the metre. Enjoy the water!” of water provided by JOWCO. What will demanded access for all. JOWCO retreated only to re-surface in they do when they have no money to re-fill While people once had communal taps Phiri, Soweto and other parts of Orange their cards for water? Children will go dirty in the streets, most households have paid Farm in 2003, where women have again and hungry, the sick will deteriorate, for taps in their yards. A minority have taps prevented the installation of meters. employment projects will close and women in their homes. Some areas have no regular Mainly unemployed, with multiple depend- will not be able to carry out the duties that water supply at all. Here, trucks come with ents and reliant upon an ever-diminishing mean the survival of those they care for. water, that is often unclean. For those with social welfare system, they have formed —Prishani Naidoo running water, cut-offs occur regularly, and organizations to advocate that the state Research & Education in the local council attributes this to non- provide basic services. Development (RED)

8 Diverting the Flow Governments and municipalities usually expect privatizations to Attention should be given to ensuring that disadvantaged and benefit their own finances, by using the proceeds of a sale to marginalized farmers, including women farmers, have equitable reduce the debts or deficits of the government itself. But this can access to water and water management systems, including sus- conflict with the financial needs of the water service itself, tainable harvesting and irrigation technology. Taking note because the price that a company is willing to pay to obtain a of the duty in article 1, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, which will depend on the profit stream that the private provides that a people may not “be deprived of its means of sub- company can expect, which in turn will be affected by the price sistence.” States parties should ensure that there is adequate it charges to users, and how generous the conditions such as access to water for subsistence farming and for securing the regulation are. livelihoods of indigenous peoples. United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Hall, David.“Water in Private Hands.” Public Service International Research International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Unit (PSIRU). June 2001. Page 10. www.psiru.org. E/C.12/2002/11. General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water. November 26, 2002. Page 4. If a government engages a private water service provider, for example, and then discovers that service is not being provid- From a human right perspective, the duty to respect, protect, ed equally to all, the government must step in—either by fur- and fulfill the right to water rests squarely on each State. ther regulating the industry—or by establishing government …Human rights standards are applicable to governments no control over the sector. matter how they arrange water services. These standards include UNIFEM.“Promoting and Protecting Women’s Right to Water in the Context the requirement that drinking water be available and accessible of Globalization and Feminized Poverty.” New York. Page 6. www.unifem.org. for all without discrimination—rich and poor, urban and rural, male and female. UNIFEM.“Promoting and Protecting Women’s Right to Water in the Context of Globalization and Feminized Poverty.” New York. Page 6. www.unifem.org.

“The global trend towards the privatization of what have traditionally been public services reduces the democratic involvement of both citizens and governments in water management decisions.”

United States: journey through the Detroit water bureau- Detroit water service’s revenue stream just Refusing to Back Down cracy, organizing meetings with the city’s enough to place it on the auction block for water commissioners and powerful city corporate takeover; in addition to the cut- The Detroit Water & Sewerage Department council. Eventually, the council president offs, water rates were increased nine per- (DSWD) supplies quality drinking water convened an emergency utility task force cent in 2002. to 4.3 million people in Detroit. During to address the cutoffs. The task force In protest, the women at MWRO, the summer of 2002, while protesting included, representation from MWRO, Sweetwater and other organizations insti- gas and electricity cutoffs in Detroit, Sweetwater Alliance and other organiza- tuted a campaign of public education, part the Michigan Welfare Rights tions. When the activists met the of which included a series of what were Organization (MWRO), an advoca- new chief administrator of DSWD, called the “Resurrection Marches” where cy union for welfare recipients, Victor Mercado, they realized the citizens were invited to join pickets around learned that tens of thousand of root of the problem was that DSWD and, with their water bills in hand, residents had been cut off from the Detroit’s water system was on a tra- enter the water department offices with basic necessity of water. The MWRO jectory toward privatization. an MWRO or Sweetwater representative to sounded the alarm. In partnership with Newly arrived from the get their water turned back on or to avoid the Sweetwater Alliance, a coalition dedi- corporation, one of the world’s largest pri- having it turned off at all. cated to keeping essential resources out vate water companies, Mercado had insti- Today, the campaign continues. Many of corporate control, an opposition cam- tuted an aggressive policy of debt collec- residents are still without water, but the paign was started against this human tion and cutoffs for non-payment, which women involved in this struggle refused to rights violation that harms poor women included cementing shut-off valves to pre- back down. above all. vent residents from turning their water —Maureen D. Taylor, The two groups set off on a circuitous back on. The goal was to improve the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization

Diverting the Flow 9 Making Waves Women are advocating at the local, Challenge the International Economic Institutions! national and global levels to demand a Trade and ‘trade-related’ policies of the World Trade human rights approach to water and other Organization (WTO) and the structural adjustment programs common resources that fulfill basic human of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank are needs. Water management must become giving transnational corporations increasingly greater access to public services. As the WTO, IMF, and World Bank work col- more transparent and accountable, in part lectively to further open essential services, including water, to through the strengthened participation of private rule, women are at the forefront of mobilizations against civil society. The following section presents these institutions and their policies. some strategies that can be used to Stop Trading Away Our Human Right to Water! advocate for our collective human right The WTO, a proponent of corporate globalization, legally binds to clean, accessible water. member nations to trade liberalization and contributes to sys- tems that elevate short-term private profits over social needs, human rights and environmental security. Water is already part Organize Locally! of certain WTO instruments and is being negotiated as a prof- itable service. It is also included under regional trade agreements Take action to ensure that control over basic human such as the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and services stays in our communities: is now being considered at the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) talks. Network and build coalitions by joining with In all of these forums, women are challenging the privatiza- others who are organizing around the issues in tion of water, which threatens, among many things, food secu- your community. rity, agricultural livelihood, health, access to public goods and biological diversity. For more info: the International Gender & Trade Network Investigate who owns your water? (see box) (www.igtn.org), Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch (www.public citizen.org/trade) and Third World Network (www.twnside.org.sg). Keep pressure on local utilities (if publicly owned) to properly maintain and update facilities.

Find out if there is talk of outsourcing, procuring The Water Corporations or contracting out operations, or selling water Three corporations now control 40% of the world’s commercial and water waste systems to private companies. water market:

Veolia: The French company (formerly Vivendi) operates in over Oppose national and state legislation that 100 countries, with $14.5 billion in annual water revenues. supports privatization. Subsidiaries include: US Filter, General-des-Eaux, Onyx, First Aqua, Culligan, Sade, Southern Water, Vivendi , Vivendi Environment, and Veolia Environnement. Mobilize for public water systems that promote universal access, gender equality, fair procedures RWE: The German energy company, which entered the water busi- and human rights. ness in 2002 when it purchased British Thames Water, operates in over 50 countries, with $2.4 billion in annual water revenues. Subsidiaries include: Thames Water, American Water, Umwelt Demand participatory water management. Aqua, RWE Energy Trading, RWE Gas, RWE-GdE, RWE-DEA, Espana S.A., China Water Company, and PRISEDA. Ensure that local decision–makers, the Suez: The French company operates in over 130 countries, with community and media are aware of positive $15.2 billion in water revenues annually. Subsidiaries include: Ondeo, Aqua Chem, Degrmont, Nalco, Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux, alternatives to privatization. Calgon, Elyo, Trigen Energy, United Water Resources, SITA, Groupe GTM, and Tractabel. Promote democratic, gender-sensitive, Other major water corporations include: , Biwater plc, people-centered, sustainable models of water Bouygues/Saur, U.S. Water, Severn Trent, Anglian Water, and the management in your community. Kelda Group. For more info: www.wateractivist.org. Source: Public Citizen, www.wateractivist.org.

10 Diverting the Flow Cancel Debt! Providing basic human services is increasingly difficult for coun- Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of tries crippled by debt and restricted by World Bank/IMF man- Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) dated structural adjustment policies that prioritize loan repay- CEDAW is a binding UN treaty that mandates equality ments over social spending. When governments cannot deliver between women and men. It calls for women to have equal services, the private sector steps in to take over, often undermin- access to natural resources,education,health and employ- ing government accountability, eroding local democratic institu- ment opportunities. It also defines what constitutes discrimi- tions, exacerbating existing inequalities and threatening human nation,sets up an agenda for national action to end it,and explicitly states that each nation has responsibilities to rights. Debt cancellation is vital to women’s struggles for clean women. As of June 2003,174 countries had ratified the treaty. water, safe food, shelter, healthcare and education. The Optional Protocol to CEDAW allows the CEDAW For more info: Jubilee South (www.jubileesouth.org) Committee to receive complaints from groups or individuals and 50 Years is Enough Network (www.50years.org). about violations by state or non-state actors. An inquiry pro- cedure is triggered when the committee receives reliable infor- mation pointing to “grave” or “systematic” violations. Strengthen the United Nations! At its biannual meetings to review country reports, The UN is the principal global forum for an internationally required from state parties every four years,the committee has recognized that structural adjustment programs,includ- agreed development agenda with a primary focus on people, ing privatization,pose serious challenges to women’s rights. rights, peace and sustainability. But the steadily encroaching Activists should pressure the committee to more fully address dominance of international economic institutions, corporations the impact of privatization. Possible actions include: and a handful of powerful governments is undermining the UN. • Lobbying the committee to adopt a general recom- To counter this threat, women’s rights and other activists mendation on women’s equal access to and control are campaigning to strengthen the UN and are backing struc- over natural resources so that governments must tural and institutional changes that will affirm the UN as the report on measures to minimize or counter fallout primary forum for global governance. The UN has also set up from privatization. high-level panels to examine various components of institu- • Sensitizing national women’s groups to use the tional reform. Optional Protocol to challenge privatization. At the same time, women are using existing UN processes to For more info: www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw, fight for gender equality and human rights, and to protect pub- or www.iwraw-ap.org/AboutIWRAW-AP.html, lic goods like water from private plunder. [email protected]. For more info: Center for UN Reform Education www.unreformcenter.org, Ubuntu www.ubuntu.org, and Global Policy Forum www.globalpolicy.org/reform/index.htm.

Millennium Development Goals for loans, these strategies are closely linked to the MDGs, but At the 2000 UN Millennium Summit 191 heads of state recom- they often overlook women and gender. mitted their governments to a global development agenda. The For more info: www.un.org/millenniumgoals, resulting eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) pro- www.unmillenniumproject.org and www.developmentgoals.org. vide numerical, time-bound targets to improve living conditions and remedy global imbalances by 2015. They include Goal 1 on Commission on Sustainable Development eradicating extreme poverty, Goal 3 on gender equality and The primary global forum where governments make decisions women’s empowerment, and Goal 7 on ensuring environmental related to water is the UN Commission on Sustainable sustainability. One specific target under Goal 7 calls for halving Development (CSD). The CSD, which was established at the the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development, now drinking water. monitors commitments made by governments at the 2002 The MDGs, with their high level of international consen- World Summit on Sustainable Development. sus offer the possibility of addressing some of the world’s most In 2003, at the first CSD session after the summit, women’s urgent development needs. However, women are arguing that rights advocates successfully lobbied governments to adopt none of the goals can be achieved without gender equality. gender as a cross-cutting theme for their work over the next Globally, gender advocates are already monitoring analyses decade. Governments also agreed to policy and review sessions produced by expert task forces on each goal, including the Water every two years, with the first cycle (2004–2005) focusing on and Sanitation Task Force. National monitoring and advocacy water, sanitation and human settlements. At stake is whether should encourage government ministries to integrate a gender governments will take actions that will reflect the and human rights approach into all discussions, including water. gender and poverty dimensions of water and sanitation. So Governments should also move beyond education and health far, the UN, international financial institutions and some gov- when talking about gender, adopt additional gender-related ernments have emphasized private investment with little men- indicators and collect sex-disaggregated data. tion of human rights—a notion echoed at the Third World As a further step, activists can monitor national poverty Water Forum in March 2003 in Kyoto, Japan. reduction strategies. Mandated by the World Bank in exchange Women’s organizations and others can get involved by

Diverting the Flow 11 approaching environment and finance ministries to find out and the business sector. Collectively, they discuss global econom- about national preparations for regional and global CSD meet- ic issues related to trade, development aid, external debt, resource ings. They can advocate for gender perspectives and human mobilization, and global economic governance and architecture, rights in government discussions on water, and share information and advocate for a more democratic, transparent, and account- about local and national problems, how women are affected, and able approach to economic decision-making. how they are fighting back. Although women were disappointed that the outcome of CSD sessions are held in April-May each year. The official CSD website the 2002 FfD Conference—the Monterrey Consensus—con- is www.un.org/esa/sustdev/index.html. For updates, join WEDO’s tained few commitments and did not take concrete steps towards Sustainable Development listserv by sending a blank email to a new global economic framework, activists and other stakehold- [email protected]. ers continue to push for a more far-reaching agenda at the annu- al ECOSOC meeting on FfD and the biannual high-level General Assembly dialogue on FfD. Financing for Development FfD decisions on global economic policy and governance The Financing for Development (FfD) process brings together carry serious implications for the UN’s work on protecting natu- the world’s governments, the UN, the Bretton institu- ral resources including water, and human rights. tions, the World Trade Organization (WTO), global civil society For updates and discussion, join the FfD Women’s Caucus listserv by sending a blank e-mail to [email protected]. The FfD official website is www.un.org/esa/ffd.

Resources Extracts Case Studies

The Final Frontier: A Working Paper on Profit Streams: The World Bank and Greedy Alexandria University, PHD Head of the Big 10 Global Water Corporations Global Water Companies. (Public Citizen, Environmental Health Dept., High and the Privatization and Corporation Water for All Campaign) Institute of Public Health. of the World’s Last Public Resource. 215 Pennsylvania Ave, SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 165 El Horria Ave., Alexandria Egypt. Fax: 203 429 (Polaris Institute) USA. Tel: (202) 546-4996; E-Mail: [email protected]; 8379/ 203 428-8436; Website: www.frcu.eun.eg/ Website: www.wateractivist.org www/universities/html/alex.html 312 Cooper Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0G7, Canada. Tel: (613) 237-1717; Email:polarisinstitute@ Promoting & Protecting Women’s Right to Dirigentes de la Federación de on.aibn.com; Website: www.polarisinstitute.org Water in the Context of Globalization & Funcionarios de Obras Sanitarias del Financing Water for the World: An Feminized Poverty. (UN Development Fund Estado (FFOSE) Alternative to Guaranteed Profits Water for Women (UNIFEM) -Secretariat) Fernandez Crespo 2256, Montevideo, Uruguay. in Private Hands. (Public Services 304 E. 45th Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY Telefax: 924-4858 or 924-2477 International Research Unit) 10017 USA. Tel: (212) 906-6400; E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.unifem.org Environment Liaison Centre International School of Computing & Mathematical Sciences, P.O. Box 72461, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: 254-2-576114, University of Greenwich, Park Row Greenwich, Thirst for Control: New Rules in the Global 576154; E-mail: [email protected]; London SE10 9LS, UK. Tel: + 44 (0) 208-331-9933; Website: www.elci.org Email: [email protected] or [email protected]; Water Grab. (Council of Canadians) Website: www.psiru.org 502-151 Slater Street, Ottawa, ON, K1P 5H3, Friends of the Earth Uruguay Canada. Tel: (613) 233-2773 or (800) 387-7177; From Social Contract to Private Contracts: E-mail: inquiries@canadians; Website: San Jose 1423, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay. www.canadians.org Tel: 598 2 9082730/ 2 9022355; E-mail: The Privatization of Health, Education and [email protected]; Website: www.redes.org.uy Basic Infrastructure. (Social Watch) Water Privatization from a Gender Jackson 1136, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay. Perspective. (Heinrich Böll Foundation) Michigan Welfare Rights Organization Tel: 598-2-419-61-92; E-mail: socwatch@ 4750 Woodward Ave, #404, Detroit, MI 48201 socialwatch.org; Website: www.socwatch.org/uy Hackesche Höfe, Rosenthaler Str. 40/41, 10178 , Germany. Tel: 30 285 34-0; E-mail: USA. Tel: (313) 832-0618; E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.mwro.org Gender and Water Development Report [email protected]; Website: www.boell.de 2003. (Gender and Water Alliance) Water Privatization in Ghana: Women’s Research and Education in Development c/o IRC International Water and Sanitation Rights Under Siege.(Integrated Social and P.O. Box 32071, Braamfontein 2017, Johannesburg, Centre PO Box 28692601, CW Delft, The South Africa. Tel: +27 011 642 7712; Netherlands. Tel: 31-15-219-2943; E-Mail: Development Centre) Website: www.red.org.za suvrat@genderand wateralliance.org; Accra, Ghana. E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.genderandwateralliance.org Website: www.isodec.org.gh Public Citizen Tambuyog Development Center Address:91 V. Luna Rd, Sikatuna Village, Quezon Human Rights and Gender Inequity in Women and Water Privatization. City, Philippines. Tel: 632-928-8289; Water Resource Management. (Center (Women’s Human Rights Net) E-mail: [email protected]; for Economic and Social Rights) 96 Spadina Ave., Suite 401, Toronto, ON, Website: www.tambuyog.org 162 Montague St., 2nd Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 M5V 2J6, Canada. Tel: (416) 594-3773; E-Mail: USA. Tel: (718) 237-9145; E-mail: rights@cesr; [email protected]; Website: www.whrnet.org Website: www.cesr.org The New Economy of Water: The Risks and Benefits of Globalization and Privatization WEDO Publications of Fresh Water. (Pacific Institute) 654 13th Street, Preservation Park, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Tel: (510) 251-1600; E-mail: Keeping you in touch with the issues [email protected]; Website: www.pacinst.org www.wedo.org/publicat/publicat.htm 12 Diverting the Flow