DOCSLIB.ORG

Billionaire Farmers Scheming to Privatize California's Water Are

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Billionaire Farmers Scheming to Privatize California's Water Are W A T E R Billionaire Farmers Scheming to Privatize California’s Water Are Under Attack Two devastating lawsuits have been filed this summer in an attempt to claw back hundreds of millions (and possibly billions) of dollars in ill-gotten profits. By Yasha Levine taxpayers’ expense, without anyone in the water supply. California spent September 14, 2010 getting wise. The litigants’ objectives nearly $100 million developing the are simple enough: to re-nationalize underground reservoir and connect- Good news from the trenches of a vital asset and shut down an illegal ing it to the state’s public canals and California’s water war: The cabal water racket that has sucked rivers aqueducts. But in 1995, the state of billionaire farmers and real es- dry, fueled unsustainable real estate suddenly, and without any public tate developers that has been engi- growth, and violated California’s debate, transferred it to a handful of neering a stealth privatization of the constitution. But to fully appreciate corporate interests. state’s water supply is under attack. the importance of these lawsuits, Two devastating lawsuits have been you have to understand the propor- By signing over control of a mas- filed this summer in an attempt to tions of the scam that was perpetrat- sive water holding facility, and the claw back hundreds of millions ed. And to do that, you have to learn billions of gallons of government- (and possibly billions) of dollars a little history about the privatiza- subsidized water it could store, in ill-gotten profits from a group of tion of the Kern Water Bank. California’s water officials created wealthy farmers and to bring one a loophole that allowed them to of the world’s largest water banks The Kern Water Bank is an under- privatize water without actually do- back under public control. The fall- ground reservoir located about 300 ing so explicitly. Once the water en- out could be monumental, but what- miles south of San Francisco, in the tered the Kern County Water Bank, ever the outcome, these suits will no hottest, driest, southernmost edge it stopped being a public resource doubt expose plenty of juicy, dark of California’s Central Valley. In and became a private commodity details that could lead to even more the late 1980s, California’s Depart- that could be sold to the highest bid- trouble for California’s water priva- ment of Water Resources began de- der. Simply put, the transfer turned teers. It’s taxpayer payback time. veloping the water bank, which can a small number of wealthy corpo- now hold enough water to hydrate rate farmers and agribusinesses into Filed by a coalition of farmers and the entire population of the city of private water merchants. environmental groups in the Sacra- Los Angeles for nearly two years, mento Superior Court, the twin law- as a safeguard against prolonged The Monterey Agreements, as the suits cut to the heart of the ongoing drought. During wet years, it would closed-door meetings that privatized backdoor privatization of Califor- serve as a repository for excess wa- the Kern bank came to be called, radi- nia’s water supply, which has al- ter coming in from Northern Cali- cally changed the longstanding water lowed a handful of rich and power- fornia, and would be pumped out in regulations that govern the State Wa- ful people to enrich themselves at dry years to make up any shortfalls ter Project (SWP), a series of reser- voirs and over 400 miles of aqueducts way it operates with dollars, that’s of “paper water,” which could be that deliver water up and down the the way we operate with water,” said traded, transferred, divvied up, and entire state. By putting a handful of Jonathan Parker, general manager of put on the books as easily as money for-profit corporations at the controls the Kern Water Bank Authority. in the bank or collateral on a loan of publicly owned water infrastruc- without anyone having to transfer a ture, the state heralded in a shadowy, According to a 2009 investigation drop. Paper water would prove to be semi-privatized water policy seem- by the Contra Costa Times, the own- a blessing for real estate developers ingly geared toward one thing: mak- ers of the Kern water bank raked in during the recent housing boom. ing wealthy people even wealthier. hundreds of millions of dollars selling back water to the state over the years. By law, every large real estate devel- In November 2009, I wrote about opment project in California must how this water bank transfer arrange- Stewart Resnick, a Beverly Hills bil- secure a reliable, long-term source ment brought in massive profits to lionaire “farmer” credited with be- of water. Until paper water came the new owners of the Kern bank, ing the brains behind the Kern Water along, this requirement posed a seri- whose money-making schemes fre- Bank water privatization scheme, ous hurdle to developers building a quently involved nothing more than pocketed $40 million in taxpayer low-income suburban paradise in the buying water at subsidized rates from funds from 2000 to 2007 via a single Southern California desert, where the state of California, then turning water buyback program adminis- water sources are either non-existent around and selling the water right tered by California’s water officials. or already strained to the maximum. back to the state at jacked-up rates: Stewart, whose private holding com- Even if there were an abundance of pany Roll International owns Fiji virgin rivers to dam and redirect, the Just as the Federal Reserve allows Water, Pom Wonderful, pesticide hundreds of millions of dollars such banks to borrow money from taxpay- manufacturer Suterra and Paramount projects would cost would eat into ers so they can reap huge profits by Agribusiness, the largest farming the fat profit margins of real estate lending it right back to the masses at company in America and the largest developers and would bring subur- a higher rate, the Kern bank allows a pistachio and almond producer in the ban sprawl expansion to a crawl. Pa- handful of corporate farmers to sell world, has also been using the Kern per water provided a neat solution: a public resource back to the public water bank to grow even bigger, developers could satisfy regulations at markup. According to Public Cit- nearly doubling his cultivated land by buying paper water from Cali- izen, in 2001, the Kern County Wa- holdings just in the three years after fornia’s agribusinesses. They didn’t ter Bank bought subsidized water the Monterey Agreements. have to secure a real water supply, from the State Water Project at $161 nor did they have to transfer a single an acre-foot and flipped it back to The Monterey Agreements did more ounce--all they needed was to show the state’s Environmental Water Ac- than transform public infrastructure that the water would be available for count for $250 an acre-foot, making into a personal ATM machine for a use in the future. a cool $6.3 million for its owners -- small group of wealthy people--they just for having the right friends in also implemented a generous debt Paper water was great for farmers, the right places. forgiveness scheme that released too. With the price of water constant- farmers like Resnick from having ly on the rise, they could make more Shocking as this textbook example to repay the state bonds that had fi- money by ditching the dirt and going of transfer of wealth is, it is neither nanced the aqueduct system used to into the water business full time. an isolated incident nor a freak loop- pipe in their subsidized water--and hole. It was the intended effect of instead put California’s residents on That’s what John Vidovich, a the deregulation and privatization of the hook for the cash. wealthy “farmer” whose family water hashed in Monterey almost 15 controls a small real estate empire years ago, which transformed water The agreements also established a in the Silicon Valley, did. As a mi- into a truly liquid asset that could be legal framework that, for the first nority stakeholder in the Kern water traded with ease on the market. time in California’s history, made bank, his firm Sandridge Partners, unregulated water commerce in Cal- pocketed $73 million selling state- “Think of the Bank of America, the ifornia possible through the concept subsidized water back to taxpayers living in a McTractHome exurb in amount, regardless of whether there ideology of “nationalizing losses, the Mojave Desert, 100 miles east was water or not. privatizing profits” is no longer of Los Angeles. limited to Wall Street. It’s alive and Where would the state get this non- well among California’s corporate Paper water was particularly lucra- existent water? Well, it could take farmers, too. tive to the Tejon Ranch Company, it away from small farmers, rural a real estate developer and second- communities and anyone else who is This is what the legal fight is all about. largest stakeholder in the water bank, poor and politically unconnected. Or which needed paper water in order it could start pumping the rivers dry- The two lawsuits seek to overturn to hydrate its planned 26,000-acre -which is exactly what California’s the Monterey Agreements, argu- development (3,500 homes, a resort Department of Water Resources end- ing that they violate the California and a massive shopping mall) in the ed up doing, all but wiping out the Constitution in two general ways: Tehachapi Mountains just north of state’s salmon population for good.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank and ADB's Role in Privatizing Water In
    World Bank and ADB’s Role in Privatizing Water in Asia By P. Raja Siregar /KAU- Indonesia Introduction An estimated 1.1 billion people in the world do not have access to safe water; 2.4 billion in the world do not have access to adequate sanitation. The poor, especially in developing countries, have suffered most from water shortages. In many developing countries, the majority of poor villages and urban slums are not yet served by the piped water system. Often, alternative water sources of the poor are polluted rivers, lakes and shallow hand-dug wells. Some are dependent on street vendors, which costs more than paying fees for piped water. Middle class consumers in many countries pay subsidized rates, becoming burdens to government and preventing the expansion of water infrastructure for the poor. The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) themselves recognized that the poor suffers most from water shortage. The Bank also agrees there is need to take urgent action to conserve water and meet the water needs of various users. Extending access to clean water for the poor and improving water management has, in fact, been used as the main campaign of the World Bank and as the basis for ADB’s water policies. Unfortunately, these very water policies already spell more harm for the poor and forebode greater degradation of the world’s diminishing water resources. The World Bank’s water privatization policy The World Bank initiated water sector reforms aim primarily at privatizing water utilities and commercializing water resources. The water privatization policy of the World Bank articulated in a 1992 paper entitled “Improving Water Resources Management” proceeds from the belief that water availability at low or no cost is uneconomical and inefficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatization of Water Desalination: the Need to Balance Governmental and Corporate Control in California
    The Global Business Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 3 5-1-2016 Privatization of Water Desalination: The Need to Balance Governmental and Corporate Control in California Melissa Lee Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/gblr Part of the Consumer Protection Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Melissa Lee, Privatization of Water Desalination: The Need to Balance Governmental and Corporate Control in California, 5 Global Bus. L. Rev. 23 (2016) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/gblr/vol5/iss1/3 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Global Business Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRIVATIZATION OF WATER DESALINATION: THE NEED TO BALANCE GOVERNMENTAL AND CORPORATE CONTROL IN CALIFORNIA MELISSA LEE ABSTRACT This note argues that California has to create regulations that prevent complete privatization of desalinationfacilities andprotect the public's right to the water. This note provides a model that should be adopted by California in order to safeguard the water and community. There must be legislations and regulationsto answer important issues of water rights and distribution of the desalinated water. Israel has utilized and the technology of desalinationfor half a century and has laws pertainingto water andprivatization that can provide insight into what should be adopted by California.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatisation of Water
    Forthcoming in: International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice The Commodification and Exploitation of Fresh Water: Property, Human Rights and Green Criminology Hope Johnson, Nigel South and Reece Walters Abstract In recent years, both developing and industrialised societies have experienced riots and civil unrest over the corporate exploitation of fresh water. Water conflicts increase as water scarcity rises and the unsustainable use of fresh water will continue to have profound implications for sustainable development and the realisation of human rights. Rather than states adopting more costly water conservation strategies or implementing efficient water technologies, corporations are exploiting natural resources in what has been described as the “privatization of water”. By using legal doctrines, states and corporations construct fresh water sources as something that can be owned or leased. For some regions, the privatization of water has enabled corporations and corrupt states to exploit a fundamental human right. Arguing that such matters are of relevance to criminology, which should be concerned with fundamental environmental and human rights, this article adopts a green criminological perspective and draws upon Treadmill of Production theory. Keywords Green criminology, eco-crime, Treadmill of Production, bottled water, water governance, water privatization, water security Introduction ‘On 28 July 2010, through Resolution 64/292 , the United Nations General Assembly explicitly recognized the human right to water and sanitation and acknowledged that clean drinking water and sanitation are essential to the realisation of all human rights.’ (United Nations, 2013). 1 Conflicts over fresh water, notably in arid regions such as the Middle East and Africa, have occurred for thousands of years (Barnaby, 2009; Pacific Institute, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Private Sector Participation in Water Infrastructure
    Private Sector Participation in Water Infrastructure Private Sector OECD CHECKLIST FOR PUBLIC ACTION Participation in Water Many countries have sought the involvement of the private sector to upgrade and develop their water and sanitation infrastructure and improve the efficiency of water systems. However, high Infrastructure capital intensity, large initial outlays, long pay-back periods, immobility of assets and low rates of return generate high risks. These factors, when combined with poor initial information and a weak OECD CHECKLIST FOR PUBLIC ACTION investment environment, constitute important constraints on private sector participation in water and sanitation infrastructure. Infrastructure Water in Participation Sector Private Recognising this, the OECD has developed practical guidance, building on the OECD Principles for Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure, to help governments and other stakeholders to assess and manage the implications of involving private actors in the financing, development and management of water and sanitation infrastructure. The resulting OECD Checklist for Public Action provides a coherent catalogue of policy directions for consideration by governments, including appropriate allocation of roles, risks and responsibilities, framework conditions and contractual arrangements necessary to make the best of private sector participation and to harness more effectively the capacities of all stakeholders. OECD CHECKLIST PUBLIC FOR ACTION The full text of this book is available on line via these links: www.sourceoecd.org/development/9789264059214 www.sourceoecd.org/environment/9789264059214 www.sourceoecd.org/finance/9789264059214 Those with access to all OECD books on line should use this link: www.sourceoecd.org/9789264059214 SourceOECD is the OECD online library of books, periodicals and statistical databases. For more information about this award-winning service and free trials ask your librarian, or write to us at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangers of Water Privatization: an Exploration of the Discriminatory Practices of Private Water Companies
    THE DANGERS OF WATER PRIVATIZATION: AN EXPLORATION OF THE DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES OF PRIVATE WATER COMPANIES Elana Ramos* In a rural Midwestern hospital, a mother and father closely watch their three-month premature son; his parents watch in horror as the infant is resuscitated and kept alive by the help of a machine.1 The little boy makes it home, but not without a heart monitor and a lifetime of concerning health issues.2 Down the hall is a disabled mother who struggles to get by with onslaughts of blackouts, which have brought her to the hospital multiple times.3 Adding to her medical plate are her twelve-year-old daughter’s alarming symptoms: clumping hair loss and burning sensations in her eyes during showers.4 Across town, a three- year-old child lays in a dentist office to have all of his teeth removed. During a five-hour procedure under anesthesia, each one of his rotten teeth are removed to prevent the spread of multiple infections throughout his mouth.5 These families all call Flint, Michigan home; a city that has been ravaged by the effects of lead poisoning.6 On January 29th, 2016 the city announced that recent testing found twenty-six locations in the city with at least ten times the federal limit of lead.7 These problems are only the * Elana Ramos, Barry University School of Law, J.D. candidate May 2017. 1 John Counts, Faces of Flint: Eric Wilson, MLIVE, http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/page/faces_of_flint_eric_wilson.html. 2 Id. 3 John Counts, Faces of Flint: Rhonda Kelso, MLIVE, http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/page/faces_of_flint_rhonda_kelso.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Privitization : Causes and Consequences
    Golden Research Thoughts Volume 2, Issue. 3, Sept 2012 Available online at www.aygrt.net ISSN:-2231-5063 ORIGINAL ARTICLE GRT Water Privitization : Causes And Consequences K. Naresh Kumar ·Research Scholar in Dept of Social Work from Osmania University. Ex Academic Consultant, Department of Social Work, Telangana University, Nizamabad. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Since water has been emerging central point in all spheres of development and social sector, similar response has also emerged from academic as well as developmental politics. Further, scarcity of fresh and clean water leads to emergence of new water business which targeted to reach nearly 2 billion consumers who are estimated as short of fresh water consumption. International markets were already proposed and pushed by world body like WTO to privatize water. Water privatization is a short hand for private sector participation in the provision of water services and sanitation, although more rarely it refers to privatization of water resources themselves. This paper examines causes, problems and role of civil society, especially, social workers and NGOs dealing with providing safe drinking water to common people in India. WATER PRIVATIZATION: Water privatization involves transferring of water control and/or water management services to private companies. The water management service may include collection, purification, distribution of water, and waste water treatment in a community. Traditionally this service has been provided by the local governmental infrastructure such as the municipality or local city council. The pro privatization lobby including water corporations, World Bank and IMF has aggressively campaigned for water privatization on the grounds that, while water subsidies promote wasteful practices, commoditization of water should allow market forces (supply and demand) to set the water tariff, which in turn will reduce water consumption and promote water conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Land and Labour : the Impacts of Forced Privatization In
    Halifax Initiative Coalition The Social Justice Committee Water, Land and Labour: The Impacts of Forced Privatization in Vulnerable Communities 153 Chapel St., Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, CANADA, K1N 1H5 Phone: (613)789-4447 Email: [email protected] Website: www.halifaxinitiative.org This report was written by Derek MacCuish of the Social Justice Committee on behalf of the Halifax Initiative Coalition with a contribution by Christopher Frankel and editorial assistance from Robin Round, Gord Walker and John Mihevc. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of all Halifax Initiative Coalition members. Any inaccuracies are the responsibility of the author. The Halifax Initiative Coalition gratefully acknowledges the generous financial support of the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 4 The financial institutions and privatization as conditionality ............................... 7 - The World Bank .................................................................................................. 7 - The IMF ............................................................................................................... 8 - Debt relief and privatization - no choice for impoverished countries ................. 9 Water, land and labour: the social and environmental impacts of privatization 11 Water ...................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • General and Social Sector and Psus, Government of Maharashtra
    Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on General & Social Sector and Public Sector Undertakings for the year ended 31 March 2019 GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA Report No. 3 of the year 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Reference Paragraph Page No. Preface vii PART-A (GENERAL AND SOCIAL SECTOR) CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION About this Report 1.1 1 Audited Entity Profile 1.2 1 Authority for Audit 1.3 2 Organisational Structure of the Offices of the Principal 1.4 2 Accountant General (Audit)-I, Mumbai and the Accountant General (Audit)-II, Nagpur Planning and Conduct of Audit 1.5 3 Significant Audit Observations 1.6 3 Responsiveness of Government to Audit 1.7 6 CHAPTER II AUDIT OF TRANSACTIONS Soil and Water Conservation Department 2.1 9 Implementation of Jalyukta Shivar Abhiyan Urban Development Department Mapping of underground utility services 2.2 19 Medical Education and Drugs Department Strengthening/upgradation of State Government 2.3 27 Medical Colleges for starting post graduate courses and creating post graduate seats Urban Development Department 2.4 38 Non-recovery of premium as per the lease agreement Urban Development Department Loss of revenue due to non-recovery of development 2.5 40 charges at enhanced rate Housing Department 2.6 42 Loss on purchase of land Housing Department 2.7 44 Undue benefit to a developer Tribal Development Department 2.8 46 Idle expenditure Tribal Development Department Blocking of funds under the scheme of supply of Oil 2.9 48 pumps and HDPE pipes to Tribal farmers Social Justice and Special Assistance Department 2.10 50 Irregular construction Public Health Department 2.11 52 Idle expenditure on establishment of Trauma Care Centre Higher and Technical Education Department Irregular release of excess amount of grant-in-aid to the 2.12 53 non-government technical institutes Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Health Impact Assessment of Drinking-Water Privatization
    Special Theme – Health Impact Assessment Towards health impact assessment of drinking-water privatization — the example of waterborne carcinogens in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) Rainer Fehr,1 Odile Mekel,1 Martin Lacombe,1 & Ulrike Wolf 2 Abstract Worldwide there is a tendency towards deregulation in many policy sectors — this, for example, includes liberalization and privatization of drinking-water management. However, concerns about the negative impacts this might have on human health call for prospective health impact assessment (HIA) on the management of drinking-water. On the basis of an established generic 10-step HIA procedure and on risk assessment methodology, this paper aims to produce quantitative estimates concerning health effects from increased exposure to carcinogens in drinking-water. Using data from North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany, probabilistic estimates of excess lifetime cancer risk, as well as estimates of additional cases of cancer from increased carcinogen exposure levels are presented. The results show how exposure to contaminants that are strictly within current limits could increase cancer risks and case-loads substantially. On the basis of the current analysis, we suggest that with uniform increases in pollutant levels, a single chemical (arsenic) is responsible for a large fraction of expected additional risk. The study also illustrates the uncertainty involved in predicting the health impacts of changes in water quality. Future analysis should include additional carcinogens, non-cancer risks including those due to microbial contamination, and the impacts of system failures and of illegal action, which may be increasingly likely to occur under changed management arrangements. If, in spite of concerns, water is privatized, it is particularly important to provide adequate surveillance of water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Reasons to Oppose Water Privatization
    Top 10 Reasons to Oppose Water Privatization The World Bank has predicted that hearing the word “privatization” when by the year 2025, two-thirds of the the global water crisis is discussed. world’s population will run short of Given the track record of corpora- fresh drinking water. Given such a grim tions that have begun to privatize wa- future, it comes as little surprise that ter systems, and given how Fortune magazine recently defined privatization has wreaked economic, st water as “the oil of the 21 century.” social and environmental havoc on The natural response to such a sce- other utility industries, there is no rea- nario would be to concentrate energy son to believe that corporations will and resources on protecting existing demonstrate more responsible stew- supplies, enhancing conservation ef- ardship practices if they gain control forts, helping vulnerable populations, of drinking water systems. improving pollution control initiatives It is no underestimation to say that and raising public awareness about the very survival of billions of people an impending crisis that could threaten could rest on decisions being made the lives of hundreds of millions — per- today — behind closed doors, in most haps billions — of people. Moreover, cases — in corporate boardrooms and such a crisis could unleash an envi- government offices throughout the ronmental cataclysm from which the world. With each drop of water that falls planet could never recover. into the hands of private interests, any Unfortunately, this is not the think- sustainable solution to the global wa- ing of corporate executives and, in- ter crisis moves further and further from creasingly, government officials the public’s grasp.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Water Utility Privatization
    Theory and Evidence.. The Price of Life: A study of the abuse of water privatization in South Africa by Michael J. Nurick An honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science Undergraduate College Leonard N. Stern School of Business New York University May 2006 Professor Marti G. Subrahmanyam Professor Fabrizio Perri Faculty Adviser Thesis Advisor Nurick 2 The Price of Life: A study of the abuse of water privatization in South Africa By: Michael J. Nurick The Leonard N. Stern School of Business Nurick 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 2: WATER UTILITY INDUSTRY BACKGROUND ............................................................... 5 2.1: A HISTORY OF WATER UTILITY PRIVATIZATION................................................................... 5 2.2: THE PRIVATE WATER INDUSTRY TODAY .............................................................................. 7 3: THE PRIVATIZATION DEBATE ......................................................................................... 8 3.1: ECONOMIC THEORY APPLIED TO WATER: ECONOMIC VS. PUBLIC GOOD? ............................ 8 3.1.1: Water as a Public Good................................................................................................ 9 3.1.2: Water as an Economic Good ...................................................................................... 10 3.2: PRIVATIZATION VS. NATIONALIZATION:
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Social Exclusion in Watershed Development in India
    Patterns of Social Exclusion in Watershed Development in India Patterns of Social Exclusion in Watershed Development in India By Eshwer B. Kale Patterns of Social Exclusion in Watershed Development in India By Eshwer B. Kale This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Eshwer B. Kale All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-5210-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5210-4 I dedicate this book to my parents, Anna and Bai. In my childhood in a tiny village, Anna, a small farmer, and Bai, my illiterate mother, had a dream to make their son the highest- qualified person in the village and together did everything possible to achieve this. It is generally recognized that poverty has both material and nonmaterial dimensions. Because of their obvious tangibility, many development practitioners find it easier to understand and address the material dimensions of poverty. The exclusion of the poor from participation in and access to opportunities and activities is a major nonmaterial dimension of poverty that also needs to be recognized and addressed. —Kazi F. Jalal Chief of the Office of Environment and Social Development, the Asian Development Bank Quotation from Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny by Amartya Sen TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables, Figures, Graphs and Maps ................................................
    [Show full text]