DOCSLIB.ORG

Claimants' Reply

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Claimants' Reply IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE RULES OF ARBITRATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES ICSID CASE No. ARB/14/22 BETWEEN: (1) BSG RESOURCES LIMITED (2) BSG RESOURCES (GUINEA) LIMITED (3) BSG RESOURCES (GUINEA) SÀRL - v - THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA CLAIMANTS' REPLY Karel Daele James Libson Mishcon de Reya LLP Africa House 70 Kingsway WC2B 6AH London Tel: +44 (0) 203 321 7060 Fax: +44 (0) 203 761 1856 Counsel for the Claimants 1 INDEX I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preliminaries 1.2 Corruption is the central issue II THE FACTS 2.1 The acquisition by BSGR of its mining rights in Simandou Blocks 1 and 2 2.1.1 The unlawful award of Rio Tinto's mining rights in Simandou Blocks 1 to 4 between 1997 and 2006 2.1.2 The withdrawal in 2008 of Rio Tinto's mining rights in Simandou Blocks 1 to 4 was lawful 2.1.3 The subsequent award of the mining rights in Simandou Blocks 1 and 2 to BSGR was lawful 2.1.4 Rio Tinto's repossession of its mining rights in Simandou Blocks 3 and 4 was unlawful 2.2 The conclusion of the Base Convention 2.2.1 Exploration permits in Simandou North and Simandou South and the Memorandum of Understanding 2.2.2 Examination by and negotiation with Technical Base Convention Committee 2.2.3 Examination by and negotiation with the Council of Ministers 2.3 The acquisition of the Mining Concession 2.4 The measures implemented by Guinea against BSGR were politically motivated 2.4.1. Mr Sammy Mebiame 2.4.2 The US Criminal Complaint against Mr Mebiame 2.4.3 Mr Mebiame pleading guilty to corruption of Guinean officials including President Condé 2.4.4 The Settlement with Och-Ziff 2.4.5 The relevance of the Mebiame documents a. Mr Mebiame’s role as a fixer for Och-Ziff’s fund b. Negotiations with President Alpha Condé c. Mr Mebiame given exclusivity over mining opportunities in Guinea d. Mr Mebiame helped set up the Guinea state mining company in which Mr Hennig and his group would be granted a stake e. Mr Mebiame and Mr Hennig involved in re-writing the Mining Code f. Mr Mebiame and Mr Hennig drafted letters, to be signed by Guinean minister, notifying existing permit holders of issues with their mining licences g. Substantial sums paid by Mr Mebiame to gain access to Guinea mining rights h. July / August 2010 – Mr Mebiame’s frank explanations to Och-Ziff i. February 2011 – Mr Hennig sought Och-Ziff’s assistance to get money to President Condé j. The Palladino loan – provision of USD 25 million to Guinea in March and April 2011 k. August 2011 – team sent by Mr Mebiame and Mr Hennig to ensure Condé kept up his side of the deal 2 l. Mr Mebiame’s contemporaneous admission of corruption 2.4.6 Unlawful corruption investigation into BSGR employees 2.4.7 Conclusion 2.5 The measures implemented by Guinea against BSGR were supported and or partly funded by George Soros and his Foundations 2.6 The measures implemented by Guinea against BSGR were improperly encouraged and supported by BSGR's competitors and ex business partners 2.6.1 Rio Tinto 2.6.2 Vale 2.6.3 Sitarail 2.6.4 Conclusion III LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF CORRUPTION 3.1 Applicable law 3.2 Corruption under Guinean criminal law 3.3 Corruption under Guinean civil and or administrative law 3.4 Proof of corruption 3.4.1 Burden of proof 3.4.2 Standard of Proof a. Standard of Proof in International Arbitral practice b Standard of proof under English Law 3.4.3 Causal link 3.5 Abuse of power IV THE MINING RIGHTS WERE NOT OBTAINED BY CORRUPTION 4.1 BSGR did not obtain the mining rights through corruption 4.2 Blocks 1 and 2 were not obtained by corruption 4.2.1 The documentary evidence shows no hint of corruption 4.2.2 Guinea’s witness evidence is sorely lacking 4.3 The Base Convention was not obtained by corruption 4.3.1 No corruption in the review of BSGR's Feasibility Study 4.3.2 BSGR did not bribe the Inter-Ministerial Committee 4.3.3 BSGR did not bribe Mr Thiam a. Mr Thiam’s motivation b. Mr Thiam’s renewal of the exploration permits for Simandou North and Simandou South was proper c. Mr Thiam acted properly in upholding BSGR’s rights to Blocks 1 and 2 d. Mr Thiam’s involvement in joint venture negotiations was in the interests of Guinea e. BSGR did not reward Thiam f. Recent corruption allegations against Mr Thiam unrelated to BSGR 4.4 The Mining Concession was not obtained by corruption 4.4 BSGR did not procure its mining rights through corruption V EVIDENTIARY ISSUES 3 5.1 Mamadie Touré 5.1.1 Guinea cannot rely on Mamadie Touré's statement 5.1.2 Mamadie Touré is not a reliable source 5.1.3 No witness corroboration of Mamadie Touré's allegations 5.2 Negative inferences 5.2.1 Negative inferences that must be drawn from Guinea's failure to produce documents 5.2.2 The adverse inferences that must be drawn VI JURISDICTION 6.1 Jurisdiction to determine claims made by BSGR Guinea 6.2 Jurisdiction to determine claims under the 1995 Mining Code 6.3 Jurisdiction to determine claims over Blocks 1 and 2 6.4 Jurisdiction to determine BSGR Limited claims based on the Mining Code 5.5 Jurisdiction to determine BOT claims VI COUNTERCLAIMS ................................................................................................ 147 6.1 BSGR is not the cause of Guinea's failure to develop its own natural resources 6.2 Guinea has to pay for the costs of investigating its own allegations 6.3 BSGR is not responsible for Guinea's tarnished image 6.4 Guinea has not provided a legal or evidentiary basis for any of its counterclaims ANNEX 1: BSGR WAS NOT INVOLVED IN A CORRUPT SCHEME IN GUINEA ANNEX 2: PRESENTATION SIMANDOU CONSPIRACY 4 ANNEX 1 I BSGR DID NOT BRIBE MAMADIE TOURÉ 1.1 BSGR did not enter into any contracts with Mamadie Touré 1.1.1 The 2007 and 2008 contracts are forged 1.1.2 Cilins’ conviction does not implicate BSGR 1.1.3 Pentler’s contracts with Mamadie Touré/Matinda in 2006 were not made on behalf of BSGR 1.1.4 Pentler did not enter the August 2010 contracts with Mamadie Touré on BSGR’s behalf 1.2 BSGR did not ask Mamadie Touré to exert influence on her husband 1.2.1 Mamadie Touré did not have influence over President Conté 1.2.2 Mamadie Touré had no involvement in the award of exploration permits over Simandou North and Simandou South 1.2.3 Mamadie Touré had no involvement in the award of exploration permits over Blocks 1 and 2 1.2.4 Mamadie Touré had no involvement in the award of exploration permits for bauxite and uranium 1.3 BSGR did not distribute payments or gifts to Mamadie Touré 1.3.1 BSGR did not give Mamadie Touré two Land Cruisers 1.3.2 BSGR did not pay Mamadie Touré $250,000 in May 2006 1.3.3 BSGR did not give Mamadie Touré cash payments 1.3.4 BSGR did not use Ghassan Boutros to make payments to Mamadie Touré 1.3.5 Pentler’s payments to Mamadie Touré in July-August 2010 were not made on behalf of BSGR 1.3.6 Pentler’s payments to Olympia in March-April 2011 were not made on behalf of BSGR 1.3.7 Olympia’s disbursement of $936,451.02 to Mamadie Touré in May 2012 was not made on behalf of BSGR and was not related to Mamadie Touré’s attestation II BSGR DID NOT BRIBE PRESIDENT CONTÉ III BSGR DID NOT BRIBE I.S. TOURÉ 3.1 BSGR’s relationship with I.S. Touré 3.2 BSGR’s payments to I.S. Touré were legitimate IV BSGR DID NOT BRIBE IBRAHIMA KASSORY FOFANA V THERE IS NO INDIRECT EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION 5.1 Context of endemic corruption 5.2 BSGR’s use of ‘consultants’ 5.2.1 Pentler and its principals 5.2.2 Bah and Daou 5.2.3 Boutros 5 5.3 BSGR has not attempted to conceal its activities 5.4 Project Hills 5.4.1 Project Hills was an expedited deal 5.4.2 The role of Skadden 5.4.3 BSGR was co-operative and open in its provision of documents 5.5 BSGR has not attempted to destroy evidence 5.6 The existence of unresolved criminal proceedings is not evidence of BSGR’s guilt 6 I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preliminaries 1. This Reply is served on behalf of: (i) BSG Resources Limited (“BSGR”); (ii) BSG Resources (Guinea) Limited (“BSGR Guernsey”); and (iii) BSGR Resources (Guinea) Sàrl (“BSGR Guinea”), together, the “Claimants”. 2. This Reply sets out Claimants' responses to Guinea's Counter Memorial dated 17 June 2016 ("Contre-Memoire de la Republique de Guinee" or "CMRG"). 3. Attached to this document are: (i) The following witness statements: Second Witness Statements of Benjamin Steinmetz (CWS-8); First Witness Statement of Sandra Merloni-Horemans (CWS-9); Second Witness Statement of Asher Avidan (CWS-10); Second Witness Statement Joseph Tchelet (CWS-11); Second Witness Statement of Marc Struik (CWS-12); Second Witness Statement of Dag Cramer (CWS-13); First Witness Statement of Cesare Morelli (CWS-14); First Witness Statement of Yuval Sasson (CWS-16). (ii) Exhibits C-0161 to C-0348; and (iii) Legal authorities CL-0031 to CL-0059.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3. Banjo.Pmd 69 05/09/2007, 11:09 70 Africa Development, Vol
    Africa Development, Vol. XXXII, No. 1, 2007, pp.69–87 © Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa, 2007 (ISSN 0850-3907) The ECOWAS Court and the Politics of Access to Justice in West Africa Adewale Banjo* Abstract Although the creation of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice (ECJ) was approved in 1991 in pursuant to the provisions of Articles 6 and 15 of the 1993 Revised Treaty of the Economic Community of West African States, it was only set up a decade later in 2001. By utilising a content-analysis method, in addition to extensive personal interviews with the President of the Court, this study describes the emergence, composition, vision and competence/jurisdiction of the ECJ. The paper probes the various challenges currently faced by the ECJ, which include among others, logistics, limited public awareness among ECOWAS citizens, and non use by member states. The inability of ECOWAS citizens to access justice is given prominent emphasis with reference to the case of Afolabi Olajide vs. Federal Republic of Nigeria. The case typifies the extent to which the ECJ’s establishment fulfilled or failed to meet the expectation of ECOWAS citi- zens’ quest for justice. The study’s conclusion examines current efforts at broad- ening access to the court for citizens of the community. Résumé Bien que la Cour de Justice Communautaire de la Cedeao ait été approuvée depuis 1991, elle n’a été mise en place qu’en 2001 – c’est-à-dire une décennie plus tard. Sa création fait suite aux dispositions des Articles 6 et 15 du Traité Révisé de la Communauté économique des États de l’Afrique de l’Ouest de 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOWAS Commission Strategic Plan
    WITHOUT PICTORIALS Strategic Plan: 2011- 2015 ECOWAS CEDEAO There is nothing we have achieved as a A PROACTIVE MECHANISM region and there is no challenge yet to come, that we can overcome FOR CHANGE without a strategic look into the future through a proactive mechanism of change and strategic planning of goals and objectives. The process is not only defining the strategy, or direction, but also making decisions on resource allocation to pursue this strategy, including its capital and people. REGIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN (2011 – 2015)1 Strategic Plan: 2011- 2015 ECOWAS CEDEAO Document Authorization Document purpose This document describes a coherent short-medium term rolling plan for the implementation of regional programs by ECOWAS Institutions and other stakeholders. It derives directly from the Long-Term Vision of ECOWAS, the ECOWAS Vision 2020. Distribution control Version Number: 1.0 Copyright owner This document is owned by ECOWAS Commission, the front office of ECOWAS Document Authorization Chairman, Council of Ministers of ECOWAS Signature:---------------------------------------------------------------------------- President, ECOWAS Commission Signature:---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Release 2 Strategic Plan: 2011- 2015 ECOWAS CEDEAO Content A Strategic Plan for the future of ECOWAS Acronyms and Abbreviations Foreword Preface Executive Summary 1. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) 1.1 Background 1.2 Institution and Policy Development Process 1.3 Institutional Capacity 1.4 Achievements to Date 2. ECOWAS Vision 2020 2.1 Restatement of the ECOWAS Vision 2.2 Mission Statement of ECOWAS Institutions 2.3 Core Values of ECOWAS Institutions 2.4 Co-ordination, Collaboration and Co-operation 3. ECOWAS Strategic Plan 3.1 Purpose of the Regional Strategic Plan 3.2 Ground Rules 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 4C Buried Secrets
    R-0048 a reporter at laRgE bURiEd sEcrets How an Israeli billionaire wrested control of one of Africa’s biggest prizes. bY paTRick radden keefE 50 THE NEW YORKER, JULY 8 & 15, 2013 TNY—2013_07_08&15—PAGE 50—133SC.—Live art r23707—CritiCAL PHOTOGRAPH TO BE WATCHED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PRESS run—pLEASE PULL KODAK APPROVAL PROOF F0R PRESS COLOR GUID- ANCE 4C ne of the world’s largest known de- As wealthy countries confront the posits of untapped iron ore is buried prospect of rapidly depleting natural re- insideO a great, forested mountain range in sources, they are turning, increasingly, the tiny West African republic of Guinea. to Africa, where oil and minerals worth In the country’s southeast highlands, far trillions of dollars remain trapped in the from any city or major roads, the Siman- ground. By one estimate, the continent dou Mountains stretch for seventy miles, holds thirty per cent of the world’s min- looming over the jungle floor like a giant eral reserves. Paul Collier, who runs the dinosaur spine. Some of the peaks have Center for the Study of African Econo- nicknames that were bestowed by geolo- mies, at Oxford, has suggested that “a gists and miners who have worked in the new scramble for Africa” is under way. area; one is Iron Maiden, another Metal- Bilateral trade between China and Af- lica. Iron ore is the raw material that, once rica, which in 2000 stood at ten billion smelted, becomes steel, and the ore at Si- dollars, is projected to top two hundred mandou is unusually rich, meaning that billion dollars this year.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of the Togo Toad, Sclerophrys Togoensis, from South-Eastern Ivory Coast
    Herpetology Notes, volume 12: 501-508 (2019) (published online on 19 May 2019) New records of the Togo Toad, Sclerophrys togoensis, from south-eastern Ivory Coast Basseu Aude-Inès Gongomin1, N’Goran Germain Kouamé1,*, and Mark-Oliver Rödel2 Abstract. Reported are new records of the forest toad, Sclerophrys togoensis, from south-eastern Ivory Coast. A small population was found in the rainforest of Mabi and Yaya Classified Forests. These forests and Taï National Park in the western part of the country are the only known and remaining Ivorian habitats of this species. Sclerophrys togoensis is confined to primary and slightly degraded rainforest. Known sites should be urgently and effectively protected from further forest loss. Keywords. Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae, Conservation, Distribution, Mabi/Yaya Classified Forests, Upper Guinea forest Introduction In Ivory Coast the known records of S. togoensis are from the Cavally and Haute Dodo Classified Forests The toad Sclerophrys togoensis (Ahl, 1924) has been (Rödel and Branch, 2002), and the Taï National Park described from Bismarckburg in Togo (Ahl, 1924). Apart and its surroundings (e.g. Ernst and Rödel, 2006; Hillers from a parasitological study (Bourgat, 1978), no recent et al., 2008), all situated in the westernmost part of the records are known from that country (Ségniagbeto et al., country (Fig. 1). During a decade of conflict, both 2007; Hillers et al., 2009). Further records have been classified forests have been deforested (P.J. Adeba, pers. published from southern Ghana (Kouamé et al., 2007; comm.), thus restricting the species known Ivorian range Hillers et al., 2009), western Ivory Coast (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics Behind the Ebola Crisis
    The Politics Behind the Ebola Crisis Africa Report N°232 | 28 October 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Pre-epidemic Situation ..................................................................................................... 3 A. Liberia ........................................................................................................................ 4 B. Sierra Leone ............................................................................................................... 5 C. Guinea ........................................................................................................................ 7 III. How Misinformation, Mistrust and Myopia Amplified the Crisis ................................... 8 A. Misinformation and Hesitation ................................................................................. 8 B. Extensive Delay and its Implications ........................................................................ 9 C. Quarantine and Containment ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea | Freedom House
    Guinea | Freedom House http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/guinea About Us DONATE Blog Contact Us REGIONS ISSUES Reports Programs Initiatives News Experts Events Donate FREEDOM IN THE WORLD Guinea Guinea Freedom in the World 2012 OVERVIEW: 2012 In July 2011, dissident army officers carried out an unsuccessful SCORES assassination attempt on President Alpha Condé. The run-up to December legislative elections—seen as the final step in cementing STATUS Guinea’s return to civilian rule after a 2008 military coup—was marred by violence and political infighting, including a police crackdown on a Partly September opposition protest in which at least two people were killed. The elections were ultimately postponed due to objections from the Free opposition. FREEDOM RATING Guinea gained independence from France in 1958 and grew increasingly 5.0 impoverished under the repressive, one-party rule of President Ahmed Sékou CIVIL LIBERTIES Touré. After his death in 1984, a military junta led by Lieutenant Colonel Lansana Conté abolished all political parties and the constitution, and began a 5 program of economic liberalization. A new constitution was adopted in 1990. Conté won the country’s first POLITICAL RIGHTS multiparty presidential election in 1993, but international observers said the poll was deeply flawed. Presidential, legislative, and municipal elections over the 5 next 12 years were similarly marred by serious irregularities; all resulted in victories for Conté and the ruling party. Security forces killed more than 130 people during nationwide antigovernment demonstrations in 2007, and martial law was declared. Union leaders agreed to suspend a general strike in exchange for Conté’s pledge to implement political and economic reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa Yearbook
    AFRICA YEARBOOK AFRICA YEARBOOK Volume 10 Politics, Economy and Society South of the Sahara in 2013 EDITED BY ANDREAS MEHLER HENNING MELBER KLAAS VAN WALRAVEN SUB-EDITOR ROLF HOFMEIER LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 ISSN 1871-2525 ISBN 978-90-04-27477-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-90-04-28264-3 (e-book) Copyright 2014 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Nijhoff, Global Oriental and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Contents i. Preface ........................................................................................................... vii ii. List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................... ix iii. Factual Overview ........................................................................................... xiii iv. List of Authors ............................................................................................... xvii I. Sub-Saharan Africa (Andreas Mehler,
    [Show full text]
  • Unintended Consequences of the 'Bushmeat Ban' in West Africa During the 2013–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Epidemic
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.028 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Bonwitt, J., Dawson, M., Kandeh, M., Ansumana, R., Sahr, F., Brown, H., & Kelly, A. H. (2018). Unintended consequences of the ‘bushmeat ban’ in West Africa during the 2013–2016 Ebola virus disease epidemic. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.028 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Transfer by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
    Governance Transfer by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) A B2 Case Study Report Christof Hartmann SFB-Governance Working Paper Series • No. 47 • December 2013 DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 700 Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit - Neue Formen des Regierens? DFG Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700 Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood - New Modes of Governance? SFB-Governance Working Paper Series Edited by the Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700 “Governance In Areas of Limited Statehood - New Modes of Gover- nance?” The SFB-Governance Working Paper Series serves to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. Inclusion of a paper in the Working Paper Series should not limit publication in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. Copyright for this issue: Christof Hartmann Editorial assistance and production: Clara Jütte/Ruth Baumgartl/Sophie Perl All SFB-Governance Working Papers can be downloaded free of charge from www.sfb-governance.de/en/publikationen or ordered in print via e-mail to [email protected]. Christof Hartmann 2013: Governance Transfer by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). A B2 Case Study Report, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 47, Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700, Berlin, December 2013. ISSN 1864-1024 (Internet) ISSN 1863-6896 (Print) This publication has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). DFG Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700 Freie Universität Berlin Alfried-Krupp-Haus Berlin Binger Straße 40 14197 Berlin Germany Phone: +49-30-838 58502 Fax: +49-30-838 58540 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.sfb-governance.de/en SFB-Governance Working Paper Series • No.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of New York
    R-0047 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Rio Tinto plc, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Vale, S.A., Benjamin Steinmetz, BSG COMPLAINT Resources Limited, BSG Resources (Guinea) Ltd. aka BSG Resources Guinée Ltd, BSGR Guinea Ltd. BVI, BSG Resources Guinée JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SARL aka BSG Resources (Guinea) SARL aka VBG-Vale BSGR Guinea, Frederic Cilins, Michael Noy, Avraham Lev Ran, Mamadie Touré, and Mahmoud Thiam, Defendants. For its Complaint, Plaintiff Rio Tinto plc (“Rio Tinto”) alleges as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is a case about the theft of Rio Tinto’s valuable mining rights by the Defendants through a scheme in violation of the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), hatched and substantially executed in the United States. The U.S.-based enterprise’s ultimate target was Rio Tinto’s mining concession in the Simandou region of southeast Guinea. Simandou is one of the most valuable iron ore deposits in the world, estimated to be worth billions of dollars. At the time Defendants devised their fraudulent scheme, Rio Tinto had spent eleven years and hundreds of million of dollars developing mining operations at Simandou and expected it to yield substantial profits into the future. 2. At the heart of the RICO scheme was Defendant Vale, S.A. (“Vale”), an international mining company whose American Depository Receipts (ADRs) are among the most-heavily traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Beginning in August 2008, Vale entered into discussions with Rio Tinto to purchase some of the Simandou asset. The Rio Tinto-Vale negotiations began in person with two meetings in New York in November 2008, during which Rio Tinto provided Vale with highly confidential and proprietary information regarding Simandou.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea
    Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. Map of Guinea1 1 For the purposes of this report, we will be using the following names for the regions of Guinea: Upper Guinea, Middle Guinea, Lower Guinea, and the Forest Region. Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword ..................................1 Proxy Voting and Participation of Executive Summary .........................2 Marginalized Groups ......................43 The Carter Center Election Access for Domestic Observers and Observation Mission in Guinea ...............5 Party Representatives ......................44 The Story of the Guinean Security ................................45 Presidential Elections ........................8 Closing and Counting ......................46 Electoral History and Political Background Tabulation .............................48 Before 2008 ..............................8 Election Dispute Resolution and the From the CNDD Regime to the Results Process ...........................51 Transition Period ..........................9 Disputes Regarding First-Round Results ........53 Chronology of the First and Disputes Regarding Second-Round Results ......54 Second Rounds ...........................10 Conclusion and Recommendations for Electoral Institutions and the Framework for the Future Elections ...........................57
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Fraud Office Investigations Regarding the Extractive Industry
    SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY 24 March 2017 | London Legal Briefings – By Daniel Hudson and David Knott The mining industry presents a high risk of corruption as operations are often located in high risk regions and it is often necessary to interact with government officials and agencies in order to obtain licenses and approvals for the exploration, development, construction and operation of a mine. These factors, when combined with the general increase in enforcement of anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, primarily by the United States and United Kingdom authorities, which has led to more investigations and prosecutions, higher monetary sanctions, and the imposition of monitors and other agents to oversee businesses, means that it critical that mining operators ensure that they have in place adequate procedures to prevent bribery from taking place. In this article we set out a brief recap on the key features of the UK Bribery Act 2010 and provide examples of recent and ongoing bribery investigations by the UK authorities regarding mining companies and other companies within the extractive industries. There are a number of ongoing overseas investigations which are outside the scope of the article but which demonstrate the high levels of activity by enforcement bodies around the world regarding the mining industry (e.g. the cross-border investigation into BSG Resources Limited, which has seen charges brought in the US against Guinea's former minister of mines and the arrest and subsequent release without charge of Beny Steinmetz). Overview of UK Bribery Act 2010 The UK's Bribery Act 2010 came into force in 2011 and updates the criminalisation of both public and private sector bribery.
    [Show full text]