Province of Ontario Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity Ontario Biodiversity Council (OBC)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Province of Ontario Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity Ontario Biodiversity Council (OBC) Renewing Our Commitment Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy Protecting What Sustains Us 2011 Ontario Biodiversity Council Recommended citation: Ontario Biodiversity Council. 2011. Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, 2011: Renewing Our Commitment to Protecting What Sustains Us. Ontario Biodiversity Council, Peterborough, ON. ISBN 978-1-4435-6955-2 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4435-6956-9 (PDF) Ontario Biodiversity Council Formed in 2005 to guide the implementation of Ontario’s first biodiversity strategy, the Ontario Biodiversity Council is a group of volunteers from environmental and conservation groups, government, academia, Aboriginal organizations and industry. The Ontario Biodiversity Science Forum, the Biodiversity Education and Awareness Network and the Stewardship Network of Ontario all work alongside the Council to guide the implementation of Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy. ONTARIO BIODIVERSITY COUNCIL Name Organization Name Organization Jon K. Grant, Don Pearson Conservation Ontario Chair Dawn Sucee Ontario Federation of Cynthia Robinson Ontario Stone, Sand & Anglers and Hunters Gravel Association Terry Rees Federation of Ontario Julie Cayley Ducks Unlimited Canada Cottagers’ Associations Sue Chiblow Chiefs of Ontario Caroline Schultz Ontario Nature George Finney Bird Studies Canada Mark Stabb Nature Conservancy of Canada Carla Grant Ontario Forestry Association Lesley Hymers Ontario Mining Association Steve Hounsell Ontario Power Generation L.G. “Len” Ugarenko Wildlife Habitat Canada Scott Jackson Ontario Forest Industries Joe Voccaro Building Industry & Land Association Development Association Linda Jeffrey Ontario Ministry of Tom Whillans Trent University Natural Resources Ag Care Jason Laronde Union of Ontario Indians Ontario Biodiversity Don McCabe Ontario Federation Science Forum of Agriculture A Message from the Ontario Biodiversity Council Ontario has the largest economy in Canada safeguard Ontario’s variety of species and and a high quality of life that attracts people ecosystems and puts forward an ambitious from around the world. Our wealth and pros- but practical conservation agenda. perity, our quality of life and our well-being Through the development of this strategy, the are directly tied to the province’s biological Ontario Biodiversity Council has been encour- diversity—or biodiversity. aged and inspired by the level of participation Biodiversity—the variety of life—is the province’s from all sectors, government and individuals rich natural bounty of plant and animal species, who came together to share ideas, knowledge land, lakes and rivers, forests and other ecosys- and a vision for the future. tems that provide us with a healthy environment, Council recognizes that no single government, clean air, productive soils, nutritious foods, and conservation organization or sector can deliver safe, clean water. This natural infrastructure the scale of change required but, together, we 2011 Strategy, Biodiversity Ontario’s also supports our forest, farming, fishing and can build upon the progress made and renew recreation and tourism industries. i our commitment to conserving our wealth— The Ontario Biodiversity Council recognizes our biodiversity. the importance of biodiversity and is taking “Protecting the diversity of life on Earth—of steps to conserve it as an essential part of which we humans are an integral part—requires building a strong and prosperous future for broad societal consensus and participation. our province. Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, It is a challenge not for some of us, but for all 2011 provides a renewed commitment to of us (Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, 2005).” Photo: Jenn Manley, OMNR Photo: Wayne Eardly Tree planting to commemorate release of Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, 2011 (Steve Hounsell and Jon Grant). Executive Summary Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, 2011 is the guiding recreation that nourishes our physical and mental framework for coordinating the conservation of health. Ontario’s biodiversity also has inherent our province’s rich variety of life and ecosystems. value and deserves to be recognized, appreci- It builds on the positive achievements of Ontario’s ated and conserved for its own sake. 2005 Strategy and sets out new and updated Ontario residents are stewards of more than one direction for the next 10 years. The Ontario million square kilometres of land and water, and Biodiversity Council led the renewal process, this landscape is home to a rich diversity of life. with support provided by the Ontario Ministry Although the ecosystems that support this of Natural Resources. The front half of this diversity are dynamic and resilient, they are lim- document provides context on Ontario’s biodi- ited in their ability to respond to rapid change. versity and the threats acting upon it. The A recent province-wide assessment showed that second half outlines the strategic framework many threats to biodiversity are increasing and Executive Summary Executive for the conservation of Ontario’s biodiversity that biodiversity losses are occurring, particu- over the next decade. ii larly in southern Ontario. Similar results have Biodiversity is the variety of life on Earth. It been found in countries around the world. There includes all living things and the ways in which are six main threats to Ontario’s biodiversity: they interact with one another and their envi- • habitat loss ronment. Simply put, biodiversity is life. There are three levels of biodiversity: • invasive alien species • population growth • genetic diversity—the variety of genetic infor- mation contained in individual plants, animals • pollution and micro-organisms • unsustainable use • species diversity—the variety of species • climate change • ecosystem diversity—the variety of These threats to biodiversity often act together habitats, ecological communities and to produce a much greater negative effect than ecological processes they do on their own. In addition to the identi- Conserving Ontario’s biodiversity is very fied threats, there are several challenges that important because healthy ecosystems sustain must be addressed to conserve Ontario’s biodi- healthy people and a healthy economy. We versity. There are also opportunities associated derive benefits from the ecosystem services with the wealth of natural capital that remains provided by biodiversity including food, fibre and with the conservation frameworks that have and medicines, clean air and water and outdoor been established. Executive Summary The vision of this Strategy is a future where Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, 2011 biodiversity loss is halted and recovery Targets is advanced. People value, protect and 1. By 2015, biodiversity is integrated into the elemen- enhance biodiversity and the ecosystem tary, secondary and postsecondary school curricula, services essential for human health and including schools of business. well-being. 2. By 2015, 50 per cent of Ontarians understand biodi- versity and its role in maintaining their health and Three goals define the conservation path well-being. proposed in this Strategy: 3. By 2015, the number of Ontarians who participate in Goal 1: Mainstream biodiversity biodiversity conservation activities is increased by by incorporating biodiversity 25 per cent. considerations into decision- 4. By 2015, all sectors have initiated the development making across the province, of implementation plans in support of Ontario’s in different sectors and in our Biodiversity Strategy, and by 2020, those plans homes, workplaces and schools. are implemented. Goal 2: Protect, restore and 5. By 2020, all relevant policies and programs inte- grate biodiversity values. recover Ontario’s genetic, species and ecosystem diversity 6. By 2015, plans for climate change mitigation are and related ecosystem func- developed and implemented and contribute to tions and processes. Ontario’s target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6 per cent below 1990 levels. Goal 3: Use Ontario’s biological 7. By 2015, strategic plans are in place to reduce the assets sustainably. threats posed to biodiversity by invasive species. The Strategy highlights four strategic direc- 8. By 2015, the release of pollutants harmful to 2011 Strategy, Biodiversity Ontario’s tions that reflect the critical components biodiversity is reduced. required to conserve Ontario’s biodiversity: 9. By 2020, the growth of Ontario’s per-capita iii resource consumption and waste generation • Engage People is halted and reversed. • Reduce Threats 10. By 2015, the status of species and ecosystems of • Enhance Resilience conservation concern in Ontario is improved. 11. By 2015, the proportion of private lands in Ontario • Improve Knowledge that are managed for biodiversity is increased. Each of the strategic directions is supported 12. By 2015, natural heritage systems plans and by long-term objectives, outcomes and biodiversity conservation strategies are key actions. The success of this Strategy developed and implemented at the municipal will be tracked through 15 specific targets and landscape levels. representing key areas of focus for biodi- 13. By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and versity conservation in Ontario. The aquatic systems are conserved through well- progress will be monitored and assessed connected networks of protected areas and other over a 10-year time frame to encourage effective area-based conservation measures. people across all sectors to take on ambi- 14. By 2020, programs and policies are in place to tious actions—actions that we hope will
Recommended publications
  • Dodging the 'Perfect Storm'
    Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs, Services, and Structures September 2013 Introduction Flooding in Calgary, Alberta and more recently in Toronto, Ontario reminds us just how vulnerable we are when it comes to extreme weather events. The loss of life, devastation, long term social and economic disruption and the staggering cleanup costs in the aftermath of these floods clearly demonstrates how essential it is to have actionable guidelines, policies and programs in place to manage these events. Flooding in downtown Calgary (2013). Source: CTV News Flooding on the Don Valley Parkway, Toronto (2013). Source: CTV News 1 Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ – Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs and Services, and Structures (2013) In Ontario, flooding is the leading cause of public emergency.1 To date, Ontario’s programs to manage floods and regulate floodplains have proven extremely effective and, indeed, the Ontario government has been a leading jurisdiction in Canada for flood planning and management. While much has been accomplished, several factors, if not addressed directly and quickly, will significantly jeopardize the ability of Conservation Authorities and all levels of governments to maintain and improve on this level of management and protection. Flood management is a shared responsibility in Ontario and Conservation Authorities are on the front lines of the Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning program. In addition, Conservation Authorities bring added protection and benefits through watershed planning, watershed stewardship/natural heritage system management, monitoring and many other programs they deliver.
    [Show full text]
  • The Swallowswallow Volume 20, # 1 Autumn 2002
    TheThe SwallowSwallow Volume 20, # 1 Autumn 2002 Directors: President: Carey Purdon 625-2610 Jean Brereton Rob Cunningham Vice-President: Leo Boland 735-7117 Merv Fediuk Myron Loback Treasurer: Bernd Krueger 625-2879 Chris Michener Elizabeth Reeves Secretary: Manson Fleguel 735-7703 Benita Richardson Gwen Purdon Sandhill Cranes in Westmeath Provincial Park, photographed by Chris Michener on September 8, 2002. Membership in the Pembroke Area Field Naturalists is available by writing to: the PAFN, Box1242, Pembroke, ON K8A 6Y6. 2002/2003 dues are: Student $5, Senior $5, Individual $7, Family $10, Individual Life $150, Family Life $200. Editor, The Swallow: Chris Michener, R.R.1, Golden Lake, ON K0J 1X0 - Submissions welcome! ph: (613) 625-2263; e-mail: [email protected] PAFN internet page: http://www.renc.igs.net/~cmichener/pafn.index.html e v e n t s Westmeath Dunes (2 walks) results and enjoy pizza courtesy of the Dates: Sunday, Sep. 29 at 8 AM., and Club. Field Participants are asked to con- Saturday, Oct.5 at 8 AM. tribute $3.00 for publishing costs in the Place: Both trips start from the munici- Audubon CBC yearly report. pal dock in the town of Westmeath. Com- ing from the west on County Road 12, To view the Count circle map and turn left in Westmeath before the gas download forms, go to our web page. (see station at the blue building and continue cover for URL) Please contact Manson down to the water. Species sometimes to confirm participation, 613-732-7703 encountered are Nelson’s Sharp-tailed - email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, Workshop 1
    LAKE ONTARIO • ~ )> "' ~ Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP • Ill -" ~ Biodiversity Conservation Strategy v Ill~ ; April 2011 ): z Lake Ontario 002987_IE10_03-B3278 Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP Biodiversity Conservation Strategy April 2011 April 2011 To our biodiversity conservation partners: The attached Lake Ontario Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) report, Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, April 2011, is the result of years of stakeholder consultation, solicitation of expert opinions, and consideration of existing biodiversity conservation program goals and objectives. The results of this broad stakeholder consultation process were summarized in the report The Beautiful Lake, A Binational Biodiversity Strategy for Lake Ontario, April 2009, which identifies twenty-six shorelines and watersheds of greatest value to Lake Ontario’s biodiversity. The attached LaMP implementation strategy lists the key recommendations provided in The Beautiful Lake report to be formally adopted by the LaMP. The LaMP will work to promote these actions, report on progress, identify resource needs and recommend additional actions as necessary to conserve Lake Ontario's biodiversity. The key elements of the Lake Ontario LaMP’s Binational Biodiversity Conservation Strategy are: 1) the integration of action priorities into existing programs and “place-based” planning activities especially within key watersheds, an activity best done by local governments and organizations and; 2) regional coordination of lakewide scale biodiversity monitoring and restoration activities. Given the enormous amount of work needed to restore and protect Lake Ontario’s biodiversity, the LaMP recognizes that the key to success lies in our ability to build and foster cooperative partnerships throughout the Lake Ontario basin. To that end, we ask that you consider the strategies and key steps outlined in this report as you plan and undertake activities to restore and protect Lake Ontario’s biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Progress Report of the Parties
    2019 PROGRESS REPORT OF THE PARTIES Pursuant to the 2012 Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement U.S. spelling is used throughout this report except when referring to Canadian titles. Units are provided in metric or U.S. customary units for activities occurring in Canada or the United States, respectively. Discussions of funding levels or costs in dollars is provided using Canadian dollars for activities occurring in Canada and U.S. dollars for activities occurring in the United States. Cat. No.: En164-53/2-2019E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-30888-3 II 2019 PROGESS REPORT OF THE PARTIES Table of Contents Executive Summary ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� iv Why the Great Lakes are Important ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Articles �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Areas of Concern Annex ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 Lakewide Management Annex ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 23 Chemicals of Mutual Concern Annex ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 38 Nutrients Annex �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking in Ontario Ulysses Travel Guides in of All Ontario’S Regions, with an Overview of Their Many Natural and Cultural Digital PDF Format Treasures
    Anytime, Anywhere in Hiking The most complete guide the World! with descriptions of some 400 trails in in Ontario 70 parks and conservation areas. In-depth coverage Hiking in Ontario in Hiking Ulysses Travel Guides in of all Ontario’s regions, with an overview of their many natural and cultural Digital PDF Format treasures. Practical information www.ulyssesguides.com from trail diffi culty ratings to trailheads and services, to enable you to carefully plan your hiking adventure. Handy trail lists including our favourite hikes, wheelchair accessible paths, trails with scenic views, historical journeys and animal lover walks. Clear maps and directions to keep you on the right track and help you get the most out of your walks. Take a hike... in Ontario! $ 24.95 CAD ISBN: 978-289464-827-8 This guide is also available in digital format (PDF). Travel better, enjoy more Extrait de la publication See the trail lists on p.287-288 A. Southern Ontario D. Eastern Ontario B. Greater Toronto and the Niagara Peninsula E. Northeastern Ontario Hiking in Ontario C. Central Ontario F. Northwestern Ontario Sudbury Sturgeon 0 150 300 km ntario Warren Falls North Bay Mattawa Rolphton NorthernSee Inset O 17 Whitefish 17 Deux l Lake Nipissing Callander Rivières rai Ottawa a T Deep River Trans Canad Espanola Killarney 69 Massey Waltham 6 Prov. Park 11 Petawawa QUÉBEC National Whitefish French River River 18 Falls Algonquin Campbell's Bay Gatineau North Channel Trail Port Loring Pembroke Plantagenet Little Current Provincial Park 17 Park Gore Bay Sundridge Shawville
    [Show full text]
  • June 21, 2021 Liz Mikel Senior Policy & Program Advisor
    June 21, 2021 Liz Mikel Senior Policy & Program Advisor Conservation & Source Protection Branch Ministry of the Environment, Conservation & Parks 40 St. Clair Avenue West 14th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1M2 Subject: ERO #019-2986 – “Regulatory Proposals (Phase 1) under the Conservation Authorities Act” Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Phase 1 Regulatory Proposals under the Conservation Authorities Act and for providing a sufficient amount of time to make a submission. The comments below are provided on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority. The Board endorsed these comments by resolution at their June 17, 2021, regular meeting and directed me to submit them on behalf of the Authority. Scope of Conservation Authority Mandate These comments relate to our observations on how well the proposed mandatory programs and services regulation aligns with the mandate of Conservation Authorities. The purpose of the Conservation Authorities Act is, “to provide for the organization and delivery of programs and services that further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources in watersheds in Ontario.” The yet-to-be proclaimed Board Report #: 2021-050 Appendix A Page: 3 Subsection 20 (1) provides for the objects of an authority, which are to provide, in the area over which it has jurisdiction, mandatory, municipal, and other programs and services. The Made-in-Ontario Environment Plan sets out a commitment to, “work in collaboration with municipalities and other stakeholders to ensure that Conservation Authorities focus and deliver on their core mandate of protecting people and property from flooding and other natural hazards and conserving natural resources.” In our view, the proposed mandatory programs and services regulation is the mechanism to align the purpose of the Act and the government’s environmental commitments with the implementing mechanism of regulatory requirements and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices for WINTER MAINTENANCE in SALT VULNERABLE AREAS
    Good Practices for WINTER MAINTENANCE IN SALT VULNERABLE AREAS Good Practices for Winter Maintenance in Salt Vulnerable Areas June 2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 FORWARD ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. THE LEGAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 The Municipal Act, 2001 ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Environmental Protection Act ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salt (2004) ....................................... 6 1.4 The Clean Water Act, 2006 ................................................................................................................. 8 2. FINDING THE BALANCE: LEGAL FRAMEWORK, GUIDANCE, AND SALT VULNERABLE AREAS ............. 13 2.1 Finding the Balance ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Prioritization of Salt Vulnerable Areas .............................................................................................. 14 3. ROAD
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL EOMF Annual Report 2003-2004
    ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2003-2004 forests for seven generations The Eastern Ontario Model Forest is proud to present this annual report on Domtar Plainfield Opaque FSC-certified paper. Cover design by Tom D. Humphries, 2004. Table of Contents Message from the President — Meeting the Challenge 1 Report of the General Manager — A Good Way to Get Things Done 2 Our People in 2003-2004 — Board of Directors 4 Our People in 2003-2004 — Staff & Associates 6 A Budding List of Accomplishments — Project Preview 8 OBJECTIVE 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW — INCREASING THE QUALITY & HEALTH OF EXISTING WOODLANDS 9 1.0 Landowner Workshop Series 9 1.1 Landowner Education 9 1.2 Demonstration Forest Initiative 9 1.3 Web-enabled Forest Management Tool 10 1.4 Eastern Ontario Urban Forest Network (EOUFN) 12 1.5 Non-timber Revenue Opportunities 14 1.6 Timber Product Revenue Opportunities 14 1.7 Sustainable Forest Certification Initiative 14 1.8 Recognition Program 16 1.9 Science Management 17 1.10 Biodiversity Indicators for Woodland Owners 18 1.11 Sugar Maple & Climate Impacts 19 1.12 Mississippi River Management Plan for Water Power 20 1.13 Limerick Forest Long Range Plan & Trail Mapping 20 1.14 Cartography Initiatives of the Mapping & Information Group 21 OBJECTIVE 2: PROJECT OVERVIEW — INCREASING FOREST COVER ACROSS THE LANDSCAPE 22 2.0 Sustainable Forest Management in Local Government Plans 22 2.1 Desired Future Forest Condition Pilot Project 23 2.2 Strategic Planting Initiative 23 2.3 Ontario Power Generation Planting Database 23 2.4 Bog to Bog (B2B) Landscape Demonstration
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment Report Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 in Association With
    Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Project Transit Project Assessment Process APPENDIX A Natural Environment Report Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 In Association With 0HWUROLQ[%DUULH5DLO&RUULGRU([SDQVLRQ3URMHFW 1DWXUDO(QYLURQPHQW5HSRUW±$XJXVW 0HWUROLQ[ %DUULH5DLO&RUULGRU([SDQVLRQ3URMHFW 7UDQVLW3URMHFW$VVHVVPHQW3URFHVV 1HZPDUNHW6XEGLYLVLRQ0LOHWR0LOH 1DWXUDO(QYLURQPHQW5HSRUW ,VVXHDQG5HYLVLRQ5HFRUG 5HY 'DWH 2ULJLQDWRU &KHFNHU $SSURYHU 'HVFULSWLRQ 3ULQW 3ULQW 3ULQW 6LJQDWXUH 6LJQDWXUH 6LJQDWXUH 7ULFLD5DGEXUQ $QGUHZ5LWFKLH03O 6WHSKHQ'RULV 06F 3O 0&,3533 0&,3533 3(QJ0$6&( )LQDO 6HQLRU(QYLURQPHQWDO 6HQLRU(QYLURQPHQWDO 3URMHFW0DQDJHU 3ODQQHU 3ODQQHU 6LJQDWXUHV 7KLVGRFXPHQWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUWKHWLWOHGSURMHFWRUQDPHGSDUWWKHUHRIDQGVKRXOGQRWEHUHOLHGXSRQRUXVHGIRUDQ\ RWKHUSURMHFWZLWKRXWDQLQGHSHQGHQWFKHFNEHLQJFDUULHGRXWDVWRLWVVXLWDELOLW\DQGSULRUZULWWHQDXWKRUL]DWLRQRI+DWFK EHLQJREWDLQHG+DWFKDFFHSWVQRUHVSRQVLELOLW\RUOLDELOLW\IRUWKHFRQVHTXHQFHRIWKLVGRFXPHQWEHLQJXVHGIRUDSXUSRVH RWKHUWKDQWKHSXUSRVHVIRUZKLFKLWZDVFRPPLVVLRQHG$Q\SHUVRQXVLQJRUUHO\LQJRQWKHGRFXPHQWIRUVXFKRWKHUSXUSRVH DJUHHVDQGZLOOE\VXFKXVHRUUHOLDQFHEHWDNHQWRFRQILUPWKHLUDJUHHPHQWWRLQGHPQLI\+DWFKIRUDOOORVVRUGDPDJH UHVXOWLQJWKHUHIURP+DWFKDFFHSWVQRUHVSRQVLELOLW\RUOLDELOLW\IRUWKLVGRFXPHQWWRDQ\SDUW\RWKHUWKDQWKHSHUVRQE\ZKRP LWZDVFRPPLVVLRQHG 7RWKHH[WHQWWKDWWKLVUHSRUWLVEDVHGRQLQIRUPDWLRQVXSSOLHGE\RWKHUSDUWLHV+DWFKDFFHSWVQROLDELOLW\IRUDQ\ORVVRU GDPDJHVXIIHUHGE\WKHFOLHQWZKHWKHUWKURXJKFRQWUDFWRUWRUWVWHPPLQJIURPDQ\FRQFOXVLRQVEDVHGRQGDWDVXSSOLHGE\ SDUWLHVRWKHUWKDQ+DWFKDQGXVHGE\+DWFKLQSUHSDULQJWKLVUHSRUW
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Ontario Acknowledges the PPS Policies As a Valuable Tool in the Comprehensive Programming Delivered by Ontario’S 38 Conservation Authorities
    Conservation Ontario Box 11, 120 Bayview Parkway Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4W3 Phone: 905-895-0716 October 12, 2001 Provincial Policy Statement Review Project Ms. Audrey Bennett, Director Provincial Planning and Environmental Services Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, 14th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 Dear Ms. Bennett: Further to your recent consultation process and efforts to involve key stakeholders in the review of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), attached are responses to the Stakeholder Questionnaire and the One Window Questionnaire endorsed by resolution #40/01 at the Conservation Ontario Council meeting on September 24, 2001. Conservation Ontario acknowledges the PPS policies as a valuable tool in the comprehensive programming delivered by Ontario’s 38 Conservation Authorities. The attached recommendations represent a consolidation of comments from the 38 Conservation Authorities and are offered in proactive response to your review of the PPS. The various roles that Conservation Authorities play in the land use planning system are outlined in the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Procedures to Address Conservation Authority Delegated Responsibility under “Further CA Roles in Plan Input, Plan Review and Appeals”. The breadth of Conservation Authority involvement in the land use planning system provides the expertise and context for the attached comments. For your information, as per the MOU, the One Window Questionnaire has been previously (August 2001) submitted to MNR and is being submitted through this consultation so that you are directly aware of our concerns with the hazards component of the PPS. Your efforts to review and ultimately to improve the PPS are appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION ONTARIO 2019 Annual Report
    CONSERVATION ONTARIO 2019 Annual Report conservationontario.ca Photo credit: Aerial Axis conservation authorities’ work was loud ADDRESSING THE and clear from partner municipalities, other CHALLENGES agencies and the general public. By September, conservation authorities were invited by the OF 2019 MECP Minister to have individual consultations. We’re very grateful for the work of our Throughout 2019, flooding was the focus partners and friends throughout the year. of work for Conservation Ontario and the An assessment of the 2019 flood events conservation authorities (CAs). It was a very was eventually carried out by a provincially KIM GAVINE, tough year for many Ontario residents and appointed Flood Advisor. He also evaluated GENERAL MANAGER businesses because of extreme flooding and Ontario’s flood management framework record high Great Lakes levels. And, instead and released his report in late 2019. of subsiding, in a number of areas it grew The report recognized the value of the worse with many flood events continuing conservation authority model and strongly on into the summer and even the fall. supported the preventative, watershed- Ironically, just as flooding was ramping up in based approach taken by conservation early April, conservation authorities’ provincial authorities to manage the risk of flooding. funding for natural hazards was cut in half with 2019 was a challenging time for conservation the Ontario spring budget. At the same time, authorities and no final decisions have the Ministry of Environment, Conservation been made yet about their programs and and Parks (MECP) posted their proposed services. A lot of work still has to be done amendments to the Conservation Authorities to fine-tune which activities are required WAYNE EMMERSON, Act (Modernizing Conservation Authority for CAs to be able to deliver the proposed BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIR Operations – Conservation Authorities Act) to the mandatory programs and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Hi Kaitie; Based on My Experience Your Contact Lists Look Similar To
    From: Currie, Leslie (MTO) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: December-14-18 12:18 PM To: Katie Bright Cc: Leanna Burgess; Halim Abdihalim; Rupesh Udash; Simon Strauss Subject: RE: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Kaitie; Based on my experience your contact lists look similar to what I would develop at MTO As always, the final decision is up to Metrolinx, and should follow the advice of Metrolinx Legal Services Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions Leslie Currie Indigenous Liaison Phone: 416-235-5229 Cell: 647-274-8489 From: Katie Bright [mailto:Katie Bright@metrolinx com] Sent: December 14, 2018 10:38 AM To: Currie, Leslie (MTO) Cc: Leanna Burgess ; Halim Abdihalim ; Rupesh Udash ; Simon Strauss Subject: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Leslie, There are two projects that Metrolinx would appreciate your feedback on re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Below are project descriptions and the lists developed to date: Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Metrolinx is currently completing environmental due diligence studies, including a Stage 1-2 archaeological assessment, for the Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Attached is a study area figure – the study area falls within the Town of Milton and the
    [Show full text]