DOCSLIB.ORG

PROJECT TRACKING – FULL VERSION June, 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROJECT TRACKING – FULL VERSION June, 2018 CONSERVATION ONTARIO PROJECT TRACKING – FULL VERSION June, 2018 GOVERNMENT RELATIONS Project Lead(s) & Project Description Committee Push for a Provincial Integrated Water Policy K.Gavine (CO) See background note May/01 and Jun/12 and Dec/13 chart. The Walkerton submissions recommend development of a Provincial integrated water policy framework and this need is reiterated wherever appropriate in dealings with the province. CO’s 2011-2015 Strategic Directions reaffirm the commitment to facilitating the development of a provincial water management framework and national water strategy (2.1). Most likely vehicles to further this agenda are implementation of Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy and the Watershed Management Futures whitepaper. A meeting between CO/CAs and several Ministries has been scheduled for April 9th to discuss the whitepaper. CO staff and CAs met with the ministries of Natural Resources, Environment and Municipal Affairs and Housing on April 9th to discuss the whitepaper. CO agreed to further flesh out the proposed amendments and return to this group for further examination and discussion. Political meetings have also taken place with the Minister Jeffrey (MMAH) on April 24/13, Minister Leal (Rural Affairs) on May 13/13 and Christine Leduce (Policy Advisor – MNR) on June 6/13. Minister Chan (Tourism, Culture and Sport) on July 22/13, Gord Miller (Environmental Commissioner) on July 25/13, Linda Kamerman (Mining and Lands Commissioner) on September 3rd, Laurie Scott (MPP Haliburton, Kawartha Lakes, Brod) on September 12/13, Frank Klees (MPP Newmarket – Aurora) on September 27/13. The CO endorsed Whitepaper working group will continue to identify options for promoting the Whitepaper. Their next meeting is scheduled for April 1, 2014.The Whitepaper Working Group met on April 1st and discussed progress to date on the Whitepaper. Given the limited provincial leadership on this file, the group recommended that instead Conservation Ontario focus on “getting their own house in order” and working more closely with the municipalities in creating greater efficiencies and effectiveness. Two areas identified as requiring additional attention including; planning and regulations and governance. A recommendation will be going forward to Council for them to endorse this new direction. At his request, Kim Gavine and General Managers from 5 CAs (Upper Thames, Lower Thames, Long Point, Kettle and Catfish) met with Jeff Yurek (MPP – Elgin-Middlesex-London and Natural Resources and Forestry critic with the Conservative Party) to discuss the work of Conservation Authorities. In December 2014, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry’s Parliamentary Assistant, Eleanor McMahon, received her mandate letter which included a directive for a review of the Conservation Authorities Act. A preliminary response was provided back to the PA asking that CO and the CAs be engaged in the review. At their December 8, 2014 Council meeting, members endorsed the creation of a CA Act Review Working Group. Made up of 15 General Managers, this group first met on January 26th to discuss goals, objectives, messages, and strategies. It was agreed that the elements of the Whtepaper should be promoted as part of the CA Act Review. A very brief and preliminary meeting was held between CO’s General Manager and the PA on March 3rd with the agreement that a follow-up meeting would be set up in the near future to flesh out a workplan for the review. On March 31st, CO’s Whitepaper Working group met to discuss the CA Act Review. They recommended that CO push for a larger Integrated Watershed Management position with the Province rather than just a technical review of the Act but a review of the CA Program and how this review could contribute to IWM in Ontario. On May 12, K. Gavine and B. Denney met with Premier’s staff to discuss the review. They were advised that a discussion paper had been prepared and was being circulated amongst provincial ministries for review and comment. st MNRF staff have shared with CO that a discussion paper will be posted on the EBR (date unknown and length unknown) On July 21 , the MNRF posted the Conservation Authorities Act Review Discussion Paper. The paper focuses on three key areas: roles & responsibilities, governance and funding. A CO CA Act Review Committee and a smaller sub-committee identified 4 key priorities through the review: CO’s General Manager met with the PA to share our key priorities. A number of engagement sessions with municpialities, conservation authorities, the development sector, the agriculture sector and the environmental sector have been set up around the province. CO has had the benefit of attending all meetings as an observer. This has enabled CO to identify key concerns and red flags within the various sectors. CO has also been requesting and meeting with politicial appointments, ministers, their staff and other key stakeholders i.e. AMO and BILD. CO has also developed a CA Act Toolkit for Conservation Authorities along with a number of fact sheets, brochures and background information on CAs.CO’s first Queen’s Park Day was held on March 10, 2016. The purpose of this event was to showcase the significant work of CAs and how they are contributing to many provincial priorities. Both Minister Mauro and Parliamentary Assistant Eleanor McMahon addressed the crowd acknowledging the work of CAs. They also indicated that while definitive actions had not been confirmed, they were very close to having next steps revealed for the CA Act Review. On May 13, 2016, the MNRF released their suggested priorities for renewal of the Conservation Authorities Act: Conserving our Future: Proposed Priorities for Renewal. The Province held a two day meeting with a CONSERVATION ONTARIO PROJECT TRACKING – FULL VERSION 2 June, 2018 GOVERNMENT RELATIONS Project Lead(s) & Project Description Committee stakeholder advisory group to obtain some preliminary feedback on the priorities. CO with five CAs were part of this group. The Province also held five engagement sessions across the Province to obtain feedback. The priority paper is posted on the EBR and comments are due September 9th. CO will be providing a collective submission and all CAs will be encouraged to submit as well. CO has prepared advocacy material for the members and will be implementing a social media campaign about the review over the summer. On July 28th, CO submitted its collective comments on the CA Act Review. Of particular focus was our request that legislative changes be made to include Preamble/Purpose Statement which reinforced the role of CAs as watershed management agencies. Meetings were held with MNRF staff over the summer to discuss and promote our legislative and workplan priorities. Meetings were also held with key stakeholders such as OFA, AMO, OHBA, BILD and CELA to discuss a multi-logo letter where common goals and objectives could be requested of the Province. A multi- logo letter was prepared with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the Canadian Environmental Law Association and focused on improving client service delivery and the provincial funding gap. A meeting between Dick Hibma and Kim Gavine were held with the new Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry, Kathryn McGarry and her senior Policy Advisor, Mark Tyler. At this meeting, our position was shared. Continued discussions between MNRF staff and CO staff also took place. The Minister spoke at Counci’s September 28th meeting where she advised the members that they would be creating a multi-stakeholder table (similar to the Conservation Authorities Liasion Committee). CO staff continue to prod ministerial and bureaucratic staff to table proposed legislative amendments. We have been advised something will be introduced spring 2017. Bill 139 – Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act was passed on December 12, 2017. A three-year Memorandum of Cooperation was signed with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry on April 17, 2018. Work is well underway with the Service Delivery Review Committee to made amendments to the CA regulations (see Conservation Authorities Act below) Association of Municipalities of Ontario K.Gavine (CO) See other background in Apr/09 and Jun/12 chart. Recent AMO staffing changes (2012) will provide an opportunity for new relationships to be D. Hibma (CO) established around some common municipal/CA issues. CO attended and exhibitied at the ROMA/OGRA Conference in February 2013. Kim Gavine and Bonnie Fox met with Pat Vanini and Monika Turner from AMO on May 21/13 to introduce and discuss the Whitepaper. AMO has advised the Province that should any committees be created, that they would want to be part of that committee. CO attended and exhibited at the ROMA/OGRA conference Feb 23-26, 2014. K. Gavine attended AMO’s 2014 conference and had the opportunity to share with the Grand Rivers Conservation Authority delegations to the Deputy Minister of Rural Affairs and the Parliamentary Assistant to the Ministry of Natural Resources. CO attended and exhibited at the ROMA/OGRA conference Feb. 2015. K. Gavine and D. Hibma attended AMO’s 2015 conference. K. Gavine had an opportunity to share a delegation with the Grand River Conservation Authority to Eleanor McMahon. There was also an opportunity to speak with Minister Mauro and many other elected officials. CO attended ROMA’s 2016 Conference in February. A question from NVCA’s Chair was posed to Minister Mauro re the CA Act Review and the need for a inter-ministerial approach. K. Gavine met with staff from AMO to discuss the CA Act Review and identify synergies and opportunities for collaboration. Bonnie Fox and Dick Hibma attended the 2016 AMO Conference where they had an opportunity to meet with several key municipal and provincial representatives. K. Gavine and B. Fox had preliminary discussions with AMO staff re the proposed changes to the CA Act on June 13, 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dodging the 'Perfect Storm'
    Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs, Services, and Structures September 2013 Introduction Flooding in Calgary, Alberta and more recently in Toronto, Ontario reminds us just how vulnerable we are when it comes to extreme weather events. The loss of life, devastation, long term social and economic disruption and the staggering cleanup costs in the aftermath of these floods clearly demonstrates how essential it is to have actionable guidelines, policies and programs in place to manage these events. Flooding in downtown Calgary (2013). Source: CTV News Flooding on the Don Valley Parkway, Toronto (2013). Source: CTV News 1 Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ – Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs and Services, and Structures (2013) In Ontario, flooding is the leading cause of public emergency.1 To date, Ontario’s programs to manage floods and regulate floodplains have proven extremely effective and, indeed, the Ontario government has been a leading jurisdiction in Canada for flood planning and management. While much has been accomplished, several factors, if not addressed directly and quickly, will significantly jeopardize the ability of Conservation Authorities and all levels of governments to maintain and improve on this level of management and protection. Flood management is a shared responsibility in Ontario and Conservation Authorities are on the front lines of the Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning program. In addition, Conservation Authorities bring added protection and benefits through watershed planning, watershed stewardship/natural heritage system management, monitoring and many other programs they deliver.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, Workshop 1
    LAKE ONTARIO • ~ )> "' ~ Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP • Ill -" ~ Biodiversity Conservation Strategy v Ill~ ; April 2011 ): z Lake Ontario 002987_IE10_03-B3278 Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP Biodiversity Conservation Strategy April 2011 April 2011 To our biodiversity conservation partners: The attached Lake Ontario Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) report, Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, April 2011, is the result of years of stakeholder consultation, solicitation of expert opinions, and consideration of existing biodiversity conservation program goals and objectives. The results of this broad stakeholder consultation process were summarized in the report The Beautiful Lake, A Binational Biodiversity Strategy for Lake Ontario, April 2009, which identifies twenty-six shorelines and watersheds of greatest value to Lake Ontario’s biodiversity. The attached LaMP implementation strategy lists the key recommendations provided in The Beautiful Lake report to be formally adopted by the LaMP. The LaMP will work to promote these actions, report on progress, identify resource needs and recommend additional actions as necessary to conserve Lake Ontario's biodiversity. The key elements of the Lake Ontario LaMP’s Binational Biodiversity Conservation Strategy are: 1) the integration of action priorities into existing programs and “place-based” planning activities especially within key watersheds, an activity best done by local governments and organizations and; 2) regional coordination of lakewide scale biodiversity monitoring and restoration activities. Given the enormous amount of work needed to restore and protect Lake Ontario’s biodiversity, the LaMP recognizes that the key to success lies in our ability to build and foster cooperative partnerships throughout the Lake Ontario basin. To that end, we ask that you consider the strategies and key steps outlined in this report as you plan and undertake activities to restore and protect Lake Ontario’s biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • June 21, 2021 Liz Mikel Senior Policy & Program Advisor
    June 21, 2021 Liz Mikel Senior Policy & Program Advisor Conservation & Source Protection Branch Ministry of the Environment, Conservation & Parks 40 St. Clair Avenue West 14th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1M2 Subject: ERO #019-2986 – “Regulatory Proposals (Phase 1) under the Conservation Authorities Act” Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Phase 1 Regulatory Proposals under the Conservation Authorities Act and for providing a sufficient amount of time to make a submission. The comments below are provided on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority. The Board endorsed these comments by resolution at their June 17, 2021, regular meeting and directed me to submit them on behalf of the Authority. Scope of Conservation Authority Mandate These comments relate to our observations on how well the proposed mandatory programs and services regulation aligns with the mandate of Conservation Authorities. The purpose of the Conservation Authorities Act is, “to provide for the organization and delivery of programs and services that further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources in watersheds in Ontario.” The yet-to-be proclaimed Board Report #: 2021-050 Appendix A Page: 3 Subsection 20 (1) provides for the objects of an authority, which are to provide, in the area over which it has jurisdiction, mandatory, municipal, and other programs and services. The Made-in-Ontario Environment Plan sets out a commitment to, “work in collaboration with municipalities and other stakeholders to ensure that Conservation Authorities focus and deliver on their core mandate of protecting people and property from flooding and other natural hazards and conserving natural resources.” In our view, the proposed mandatory programs and services regulation is the mechanism to align the purpose of the Act and the government’s environmental commitments with the implementing mechanism of regulatory requirements and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices for WINTER MAINTENANCE in SALT VULNERABLE AREAS
    Good Practices for WINTER MAINTENANCE IN SALT VULNERABLE AREAS Good Practices for Winter Maintenance in Salt Vulnerable Areas June 2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 FORWARD ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. THE LEGAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 The Municipal Act, 2001 ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Environmental Protection Act ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salt (2004) ....................................... 6 1.4 The Clean Water Act, 2006 ................................................................................................................. 8 2. FINDING THE BALANCE: LEGAL FRAMEWORK, GUIDANCE, AND SALT VULNERABLE AREAS ............. 13 2.1 Finding the Balance ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Prioritization of Salt Vulnerable Areas .............................................................................................. 14 3. ROAD
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment Report Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 in Association With
    Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Project Transit Project Assessment Process APPENDIX A Natural Environment Report Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 In Association With 0HWUROLQ[%DUULH5DLO&RUULGRU([SDQVLRQ3URMHFW 1DWXUDO(QYLURQPHQW5HSRUW±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
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Ontario Acknowledges the PPS Policies As a Valuable Tool in the Comprehensive Programming Delivered by Ontario’S 38 Conservation Authorities
    Conservation Ontario Box 11, 120 Bayview Parkway Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4W3 Phone: 905-895-0716 October 12, 2001 Provincial Policy Statement Review Project Ms. Audrey Bennett, Director Provincial Planning and Environmental Services Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, 14th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 Dear Ms. Bennett: Further to your recent consultation process and efforts to involve key stakeholders in the review of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), attached are responses to the Stakeholder Questionnaire and the One Window Questionnaire endorsed by resolution #40/01 at the Conservation Ontario Council meeting on September 24, 2001. Conservation Ontario acknowledges the PPS policies as a valuable tool in the comprehensive programming delivered by Ontario’s 38 Conservation Authorities. The attached recommendations represent a consolidation of comments from the 38 Conservation Authorities and are offered in proactive response to your review of the PPS. The various roles that Conservation Authorities play in the land use planning system are outlined in the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Procedures to Address Conservation Authority Delegated Responsibility under “Further CA Roles in Plan Input, Plan Review and Appeals”. The breadth of Conservation Authority involvement in the land use planning system provides the expertise and context for the attached comments. For your information, as per the MOU, the One Window Questionnaire has been previously (August 2001) submitted to MNR and is being submitted through this consultation so that you are directly aware of our concerns with the hazards component of the PPS. Your efforts to review and ultimately to improve the PPS are appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION ONTARIO 2019 Annual Report
    CONSERVATION ONTARIO 2019 Annual Report conservationontario.ca Photo credit: Aerial Axis conservation authorities’ work was loud ADDRESSING THE and clear from partner municipalities, other CHALLENGES agencies and the general public. By September, conservation authorities were invited by the OF 2019 MECP Minister to have individual consultations. We’re very grateful for the work of our Throughout 2019, flooding was the focus partners and friends throughout the year. of work for Conservation Ontario and the An assessment of the 2019 flood events conservation authorities (CAs). It was a very was eventually carried out by a provincially KIM GAVINE, tough year for many Ontario residents and appointed Flood Advisor. He also evaluated GENERAL MANAGER businesses because of extreme flooding and Ontario’s flood management framework record high Great Lakes levels. And, instead and released his report in late 2019. of subsiding, in a number of areas it grew The report recognized the value of the worse with many flood events continuing conservation authority model and strongly on into the summer and even the fall. supported the preventative, watershed- Ironically, just as flooding was ramping up in based approach taken by conservation early April, conservation authorities’ provincial authorities to manage the risk of flooding. funding for natural hazards was cut in half with 2019 was a challenging time for conservation the Ontario spring budget. At the same time, authorities and no final decisions have the Ministry of Environment, Conservation been made yet about their programs and and Parks (MECP) posted their proposed services. A lot of work still has to be done amendments to the Conservation Authorities to fine-tune which activities are required WAYNE EMMERSON, Act (Modernizing Conservation Authority for CAs to be able to deliver the proposed BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIR Operations – Conservation Authorities Act) to the mandatory programs and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Hi Kaitie; Based on My Experience Your Contact Lists Look Similar To
    From: Currie, Leslie (MTO) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: December-14-18 12:18 PM To: Katie Bright Cc: Leanna Burgess; Halim Abdihalim; Rupesh Udash; Simon Strauss Subject: RE: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Kaitie; Based on my experience your contact lists look similar to what I would develop at MTO As always, the final decision is up to Metrolinx, and should follow the advice of Metrolinx Legal Services Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions Leslie Currie Indigenous Liaison Phone: 416-235-5229 Cell: 647-274-8489 From: Katie Bright [mailto:Katie Bright@metrolinx com] Sent: December 14, 2018 10:38 AM To: Currie, Leslie (MTO) Cc: Leanna Burgess ; Halim Abdihalim ; Rupesh Udash ; Simon Strauss Subject: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Leslie, There are two projects that Metrolinx would appreciate your feedback on re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Below are project descriptions and the lists developed to date: Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Metrolinx is currently completing environmental due diligence studies, including a Stage 1-2 archaeological assessment, for the Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Attached is a study area figure – the study area falls within the Town of Milton and the
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
    Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Province of Ontario Water Conservation and Efficiency Program Annual Review 2017
    Province of Ontario Water Conservation and Efficiency Program Annual Review 2017 The following information is submitted by the Province of Ontario to the Great Lakes Regional Body pursuant to the provisions in the Agreement Article 304 of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement (Agreement). 1. Lead agencies and contact persons: Ling Mark, Director Jason Travers, Director Land and Water Policy Branch Natural Resources Conservation Policy Branch Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Climate Change Forestry 2. Status of Ontario’s water conservation and efficiency goals and objectives consistent with the Basin-wide goals and objectives In 2012 Ontario adopted water conservation and efficiency goals and objectives that are consistent with the Basin-wide goals and objectives. The goals and objectives were developed based on stakeholder consultation and public comments received. Ontario’s goals are identical to the goals prescribed in the Agreement. Ontario’s objectives are consistent with the regional objectives adopted for the Basin and have been tailored for Ontario to reflect the direction in the Water Opportunities and Water Conservation Act, 2010, and to address stakeholder requests to emphasize the importance of taking ecological water needs into account in decision making, in keeping with the broader ecosystem protection and restoration goals of the Agreement. Ontario’s water conservation goals and objectives are available at: http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/ontarios-water-conservation-and-efficiency- goals-objectives-and-programs 3. Ontario’s water conservation and efficiency program overview Ontario’s water conservation and efficiency program consists of a wide variety of statutes, programs and policies administered across nine ministries.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting #3/13
    INDEX TO AUTHORITY MEETING #3/13 Friday, April 26, 2013 MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #2/13, held on March 22, 2013 107 PRESENTATIONS Fenning, Mike, Senior Manager, Conservation Lands and Property Services, TRCA, re: Land Acquisition. 107 Sgambelluri, Rocco, Chief Financial Officer, re: 2013 Budget, Operating and Capital. 107 TRCA Staff re: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Strategic Plan - 2013. 107 TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY STRATEGIC PLAN - 2013 108 PARKS CANADA Interim Management Agreement 137 RECREATIONAL FISHERIES PLAN Greater Toronto and Area Waterfront 138 DUFFINS MARSH RESTORATION Ontario Power Generation Pickering Nuclear Station 141 EURASIAN MILFOIL AT FRENCHMAN'S BAY 144 SWAN LAKE RESIDENCE RENOVATION AND RETROFIT PROJECT 148 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN STRATEGY UPDATE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE 151 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Lea Vivot and 11220 Highway 27 Holdings Inc. 171 REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND Rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville 172 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. Proposal for Lease of Land Petticoat Creek Conservation Area, City of Pickering, Region of Durham 173 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. Proposal for Lease of Land Vicinity of Lake St. George Field Centre 174 TOWN OF AJAX Request for a Permanent Easement for the Pedestrian Bridge, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, Carruthers Creek 175 EMPIRE COMMUNITIES (2183 LAKESHORE BLVD.) LTD. Lease of
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Ourfuture Ontario Provincial Plans and Conservation Authorities
    Protecting OurFuture Ontario Provincial Plans and Conservation Authorities March 2015 Greenbelt Plan I Niagara Escarpment Plan I Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe I Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan A Healthy & Strong Future For Ontarians Sustainable Ecosystem Benefits Economy Clean, Sustainable Forests, Wetlands, Water, Food, Resilient Water, Soil, Habitat, Environment Plants, Animals Flood Control, & more Healthy People Green spaces, wetlands, forests, moraines, escarpment, Through their watershed planning process, land and the Great Lakes improve water quality, provide drinking management activities, regulatory programs, recreational water, help to prevent flooding and erosion, contribute to opportunities and stewardship initiatives, Conservation our economy, and provide important habitat for wildlife Authorities help to meet the goals and objectives of the and birds. They also help us to connect to Nature. Provincial plans. The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Greenbelt Conservation Authorities do this work in partnership with Plan, Niagara Escarpment Plan, and the Growth Plan for municipalities, the Provincial and Federal governments, the Greater Golden Horseshoe protect important natural landowners, other agencies and many community groups. resources and promote more sustainable growth patterns. Eighteen of Ontario’s 36 Conservation Authorities play a key role in helping to meet the goals and objectives of these plans. Ontario’s Conservation Authorities are watershed management agencies that protect important ecosystems using an integrated watershed management approach. Integrated watershed management means managing upstream activities so that downstream resources are healthy and sustainable. This approach considers economic, social and ecological interests, together, with issues such as climate change impacts or intense urbanization. Balancing economic and social interests with the long- term health of the environment results in smarter, collaborative decisions.
    [Show full text]