Council Agenda Wednesday November 20, 2019 @ 6:30 P.M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Grey Highlands.Indd
photo: Telfer Wegg GREY HIGHLANDS ONTARIO > BLUEWATER REGION • www.greyhighlands.ca • Includes the communities/villages of Eugenia, Feversham, Flesherton, Kimberley, Markdale and Vandeleur • Population: 9,520 Approx. 30 km southeast of Owen Sound; 150 km photo: Telfer Wegg • northwest of Toronto Notable features: • Geographically, the municipality is a mix of villages, hamlets, rural and Small Community heritage communities, and offers a variety of landscapes from agricultural flat lands, to rolling hills and wetlands. • The Niagara Escarpment World Bio Reserve’s runs through the area. • Agriculture forms the basis of the region’s economy. Farms range from small family-owned to large and highly automated HEART OF THE • Mennonite families from Waterloo Region have migrated to Grey Highlands and contribute to the prosperity of the area’s agricultural lifestyle • Businesses also include art galleries—the area has become home to many BEAVER VALLEY artists and musicians The Municipality of Grey Highlands is situated in one of the • Residents have a deep connection to the roots of the municipality with most beautiful parts of Grey County. Made up of the former many local residents descended from the original settlers to the area Townships of Artemesia, Euphrasia, Osprey and the Villages • Agnes Macphail was an early champion of equal rights for women, and of Markdale and Flesherton, the township proudly boast the Canada’s first female MP. She is a local legend, having lived in the Grey natural beauty of waterfalls, the Bruce Trail, the Osprey Bluffs Highlands Municipality and the Saugeen and Beaver Rivers and encompass the “heart • Notable alumni also includes Chris Neil, NHL player (Ottawa Senators) of the Beaver Valley” truly making Grey Highlands the place for all seasons. -
Dodging the 'Perfect Storm'
Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs, Services, and Structures September 2013 Introduction Flooding in Calgary, Alberta and more recently in Toronto, Ontario reminds us just how vulnerable we are when it comes to extreme weather events. The loss of life, devastation, long term social and economic disruption and the staggering cleanup costs in the aftermath of these floods clearly demonstrates how essential it is to have actionable guidelines, policies and programs in place to manage these events. Flooding in downtown Calgary (2013). Source: CTV News Flooding on the Don Valley Parkway, Toronto (2013). Source: CTV News 1 Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ – Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs and Services, and Structures (2013) In Ontario, flooding is the leading cause of public emergency.1 To date, Ontario’s programs to manage floods and regulate floodplains have proven extremely effective and, indeed, the Ontario government has been a leading jurisdiction in Canada for flood planning and management. While much has been accomplished, several factors, if not addressed directly and quickly, will significantly jeopardize the ability of Conservation Authorities and all levels of governments to maintain and improve on this level of management and protection. Flood management is a shared responsibility in Ontario and Conservation Authorities are on the front lines of the Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning program. In addition, Conservation Authorities bring added protection and benefits through watershed planning, watershed stewardship/natural heritage system management, monitoring and many other programs they deliver. -
2019 Civic Directory
Municipality of Grey Highlands 2019 Civic Directory Municipal Office Planning & Building Office Phone: 519-986-2811 206 Toronto Street South 50 Lorne Street Email: [email protected] Unit #1, P.O. Box 409 Markdale, ON Website: www.greyhighlands.ca Markdale, ON N0C 1H0 N0C 1H0 5 t h C o n N o t r h G e r y 2 n R d o a C d o 1 n Grey 8 Road 18 S o u t h Ge rald Short t Pkwy 10 Sideroad 1 2 d y S t S t T h ELMHEDGE Side o L ro w i ad V 6 e i n n n n l BO e i 4 e c h GN n t O R a e h n SEE m Scotch C t INSE - G o T 8 Sideroad Mountain Rd n e r 1 7 Sideroad 7 Sideroad c 1 y 1 e t G h s s 7 Srd R 7 e r t i s t L 3 d h Si C Tucker Street d r i e o ro y a n d d 3 2 L o n e R 9 i n L n o i e T o S MINNIEHILL n a G e M h G e re d e y r R e u d 2 29 M Si 7 t n d a y l ero B h ad e d 3 f o 4 Sideraoad R 4 Sideroad Hurlburt Crt u u E C d f r G o e C R o F o H a e r o i p o r l o l M d lan F a T d n d STRATHNAIRN d - D t s Sy e h g e r o d T en y h 1 a r a v S 1 m i o e w e T n u eow O Duncan 0 n Arthur Taylor Lane n R l l 2 d i w r c n o r r e M s n i s t n s GRIERSV c d ILL h u E S o m n t h a l a e e St W i Field a crest Court R t i n a a l m t h l 2 i H - t ag s i e L n t m S e R n 9 C e r i e L s Lake Shore Road o n a o ne L o a - e l n S n l d a Eu Eastwind Lane c phrasia St Vincent Townl t n ine Ba e W ptist AL d 30th Sideroad Lakewood Drive i s Lane s TER'S Clark St d a o FA V M Collens Crt ASS Hamill LLS Euphrasia- S t Vincent Townl o n R ine e IE t d R T u E t S r Indian Circle 9 h e l Wards Rd e ive Deviation Road Woodland Park Rd e e -
Lake Ontario Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, Workshop 1
LAKE ONTARIO • ~ )> "' ~ Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP • Ill -" ~ Biodiversity Conservation Strategy v Ill~ ; April 2011 ): z Lake Ontario 002987_IE10_03-B3278 Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP Biodiversity Conservation Strategy April 2011 April 2011 To our biodiversity conservation partners: The attached Lake Ontario Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) report, Implementing a Lake Ontario LaMP Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, April 2011, is the result of years of stakeholder consultation, solicitation of expert opinions, and consideration of existing biodiversity conservation program goals and objectives. The results of this broad stakeholder consultation process were summarized in the report The Beautiful Lake, A Binational Biodiversity Strategy for Lake Ontario, April 2009, which identifies twenty-six shorelines and watersheds of greatest value to Lake Ontario’s biodiversity. The attached LaMP implementation strategy lists the key recommendations provided in The Beautiful Lake report to be formally adopted by the LaMP. The LaMP will work to promote these actions, report on progress, identify resource needs and recommend additional actions as necessary to conserve Lake Ontario's biodiversity. The key elements of the Lake Ontario LaMP’s Binational Biodiversity Conservation Strategy are: 1) the integration of action priorities into existing programs and “place-based” planning activities especially within key watersheds, an activity best done by local governments and organizations and; 2) regional coordination of lakewide scale biodiversity monitoring and restoration activities. Given the enormous amount of work needed to restore and protect Lake Ontario’s biodiversity, the LaMP recognizes that the key to success lies in our ability to build and foster cooperative partnerships throughout the Lake Ontario basin. To that end, we ask that you consider the strategies and key steps outlined in this report as you plan and undertake activities to restore and protect Lake Ontario’s biodiversity. -
The Corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands By-Law Number 2012 - 63
“OFFICE CONSOLIDATION” THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS BY-LAW NUMBER 2012 - 63 A BY-LAW TO ESTABLISH FEES AND CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED BY THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS [Title amended by By-law 2013-22] WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 2001 provides that a Municipality may pass by-laws imposing fees or charges on any class of persons; and, WHEREAS the Planning Act, being Chapter P.13 R.S.O. 1990 as amended, provides that Council may prescribe a tariff of fees for the processing of applications made in respect of planning matters; and, WHEREAS pursuant to the Building Code Act, 1992, S.O. 1992 c 23 as amended, Council may require the payment of fees on applications for and issuance of building permits and prescribing the amounts thereof; and WHEREAS pursuant to the Cemeteries Act (Revised) R.S.O. 1990, chapter C.4 as amended, provided that every owner shall file with the Registrar a price list of all interment rights and cemetery services and supplies that may be sold and all charges that may be made by that owner, approved on January 4, 2006; and WHEREAS the Corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands deems it expedient to update the fees and charges to be collected by the various departments of the Corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands, NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands hereby enacts as follows: 1. Council hereby establishes the fees and charges as set out in Schedule ‘A’, Schedule ‘B’, Schedule ‘C’, Schedule ‘D’, Schedule ‘E’, Schedule ‘F’, Schedule ‘G’, Schedule ‘H’, Schedule ‘I’, Schedule ‘J’; [Schedules D, E, F, amended by By-law 2013-22] [Schedules G, I replaced by By-law 2013-22] [Schedules A, B replaced by By-law 2014-11] [Schedules A, B replaced by By-law 2014-12] [Schedules A, D, E, F, G, I replaced by By-law 2016-16] [Schedules A, F replaced/Schedule J added by By-law 2017-21] [Schedule J amended by By-Law 2017-114] 2. -
Time Line by Clare Mclean-Wilson
Time Line By Clare McLean-Wilson 1615 Champlain and the Recollet Missionary Father LeCaron are the first white men to visit the native people that live in what will become Grey County. 1815 Captain Owen, in his ‘little survey schooner’ discovers the harbour that will later be named Owen Sound. 1818 The first native treaty is struck. For the ‘yearly payment for ever of twelve hundred pounds of currency in goods at Montreal Prices’ the land covered by Osprey, Collingwood, Artemesia, Euphrasia and St. Vincent, approximately one million five hundred and ninety two acres, is relinquished by its native occupants. 1833 Charles Rankin comes to survey and lay out townships in “the Wild Land beyond the Simcoe district”. 1835 Tarvas Indians from Wikwemikog and Pottawattamies from the State of Wisconsin join the Ojibway people of this area after their land is given to the Government of the United States. 1836 The Sauking Treaty takes “in the land in the County of Grey from the west of the Townships of Euphrasia and St. Vincent to a line directly west of Owen Sound and extending south from that line probably over all the remainder of the county.” Except Sarawak and Keppel, all of the future Grey County is in white hands. 1841 July 6, the first post office in Grey County is opened in St. Vincent Township. 1848 First year that what will be Grey County has an election for a member of the Provincial Legislative Assembly. 1849 First horse brought to Grey County. It was white and belonged to Arthur Hill Rigland Mulholland, a clergyman. -
June 21, 2021 Liz Mikel Senior Policy & Program Advisor
June 21, 2021 Liz Mikel Senior Policy & Program Advisor Conservation & Source Protection Branch Ministry of the Environment, Conservation & Parks 40 St. Clair Avenue West 14th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1M2 Subject: ERO #019-2986 – “Regulatory Proposals (Phase 1) under the Conservation Authorities Act” Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Phase 1 Regulatory Proposals under the Conservation Authorities Act and for providing a sufficient amount of time to make a submission. The comments below are provided on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority. The Board endorsed these comments by resolution at their June 17, 2021, regular meeting and directed me to submit them on behalf of the Authority. Scope of Conservation Authority Mandate These comments relate to our observations on how well the proposed mandatory programs and services regulation aligns with the mandate of Conservation Authorities. The purpose of the Conservation Authorities Act is, “to provide for the organization and delivery of programs and services that further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources in watersheds in Ontario.” The yet-to-be proclaimed Board Report #: 2021-050 Appendix A Page: 3 Subsection 20 (1) provides for the objects of an authority, which are to provide, in the area over which it has jurisdiction, mandatory, municipal, and other programs and services. The Made-in-Ontario Environment Plan sets out a commitment to, “work in collaboration with municipalities and other stakeholders to ensure that Conservation Authorities focus and deliver on their core mandate of protecting people and property from flooding and other natural hazards and conserving natural resources.” In our view, the proposed mandatory programs and services regulation is the mechanism to align the purpose of the Act and the government’s environmental commitments with the implementing mechanism of regulatory requirements and standards. -
Good Practices for WINTER MAINTENANCE in SALT VULNERABLE AREAS
Good Practices for WINTER MAINTENANCE IN SALT VULNERABLE AREAS Good Practices for Winter Maintenance in Salt Vulnerable Areas June 2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 FORWARD ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. THE LEGAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 The Municipal Act, 2001 ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Environmental Protection Act ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salt (2004) ....................................... 6 1.4 The Clean Water Act, 2006 ................................................................................................................. 8 2. FINDING THE BALANCE: LEGAL FRAMEWORK, GUIDANCE, AND SALT VULNERABLE AREAS ............. 13 2.1 Finding the Balance ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Prioritization of Salt Vulnerable Areas .............................................................................................. 14 3. ROAD -
Natural Environment Report Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 in Association With
Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Project Transit Project Assessment Process APPENDIX A Natural Environment Report Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 In Association With 0HWUROLQ[%DUULH5DLO&RUULGRU([SDQVLRQ3URMHFW 1DWXUDO(QYLURQPHQW5HSRUW±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
Conservation Ontario Acknowledges the PPS Policies As a Valuable Tool in the Comprehensive Programming Delivered by Ontario’S 38 Conservation Authorities
Conservation Ontario Box 11, 120 Bayview Parkway Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4W3 Phone: 905-895-0716 October 12, 2001 Provincial Policy Statement Review Project Ms. Audrey Bennett, Director Provincial Planning and Environmental Services Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, 14th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 Dear Ms. Bennett: Further to your recent consultation process and efforts to involve key stakeholders in the review of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), attached are responses to the Stakeholder Questionnaire and the One Window Questionnaire endorsed by resolution #40/01 at the Conservation Ontario Council meeting on September 24, 2001. Conservation Ontario acknowledges the PPS policies as a valuable tool in the comprehensive programming delivered by Ontario’s 38 Conservation Authorities. The attached recommendations represent a consolidation of comments from the 38 Conservation Authorities and are offered in proactive response to your review of the PPS. The various roles that Conservation Authorities play in the land use planning system are outlined in the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Procedures to Address Conservation Authority Delegated Responsibility under “Further CA Roles in Plan Input, Plan Review and Appeals”. The breadth of Conservation Authority involvement in the land use planning system provides the expertise and context for the attached comments. For your information, as per the MOU, the One Window Questionnaire has been previously (August 2001) submitted to MNR and is being submitted through this consultation so that you are directly aware of our concerns with the hazards component of the PPS. Your efforts to review and ultimately to improve the PPS are appreciated. -
CONSERVATION ONTARIO 2019 Annual Report
CONSERVATION ONTARIO 2019 Annual Report conservationontario.ca Photo credit: Aerial Axis conservation authorities’ work was loud ADDRESSING THE and clear from partner municipalities, other CHALLENGES agencies and the general public. By September, conservation authorities were invited by the OF 2019 MECP Minister to have individual consultations. We’re very grateful for the work of our Throughout 2019, flooding was the focus partners and friends throughout the year. of work for Conservation Ontario and the An assessment of the 2019 flood events conservation authorities (CAs). It was a very was eventually carried out by a provincially KIM GAVINE, tough year for many Ontario residents and appointed Flood Advisor. He also evaluated GENERAL MANAGER businesses because of extreme flooding and Ontario’s flood management framework record high Great Lakes levels. And, instead and released his report in late 2019. of subsiding, in a number of areas it grew The report recognized the value of the worse with many flood events continuing conservation authority model and strongly on into the summer and even the fall. supported the preventative, watershed- Ironically, just as flooding was ramping up in based approach taken by conservation early April, conservation authorities’ provincial authorities to manage the risk of flooding. funding for natural hazards was cut in half with 2019 was a challenging time for conservation the Ontario spring budget. At the same time, authorities and no final decisions have the Ministry of Environment, Conservation been made yet about their programs and and Parks (MECP) posted their proposed services. A lot of work still has to be done amendments to the Conservation Authorities to fine-tune which activities are required WAYNE EMMERSON, Act (Modernizing Conservation Authority for CAs to be able to deliver the proposed BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIR Operations – Conservation Authorities Act) to the mandatory programs and services. -
Hi Kaitie; Based on My Experience Your Contact Lists Look Similar To
From: Currie, Leslie (MTO) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: December-14-18 12:18 PM To: Katie Bright Cc: Leanna Burgess; Halim Abdihalim; Rupesh Udash; Simon Strauss Subject: RE: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Kaitie; Based on my experience your contact lists look similar to what I would develop at MTO As always, the final decision is up to Metrolinx, and should follow the advice of Metrolinx Legal Services Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions Leslie Currie Indigenous Liaison Phone: 416-235-5229 Cell: 647-274-8489 From: Katie Bright [mailto:Katie Bright@metrolinx com] Sent: December 14, 2018 10:38 AM To: Currie, Leslie (MTO) Cc: Leanna Burgess ; Halim Abdihalim ; Rupesh Udash ; Simon Strauss Subject: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Leslie, There are two projects that Metrolinx would appreciate your feedback on re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Below are project descriptions and the lists developed to date: Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Metrolinx is currently completing environmental due diligence studies, including a Stage 1-2 archaeological assessment, for the Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Attached is a study area figure – the study area falls within the Town of Milton and the