DOCSLIB.ORG

Result of (Roll-Call) Votes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Result of (Roll-Call) Votes European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Result of (roll-call) votes LIBE Voting Session of 20 April 2021 Concerned AM Tabled by Remarks Rapp Vote text Resolution on the ruling of the ECJ of 16 July 2020 - Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximilian Schrems 2020-2789_RSP (Juan Fernando López Aguilar) Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote) + 53/1/12 Draft recommendation for second reading on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online (2018/0331(COD)) (Patryk Jaki) Vote on the draft recommendation – Text as a whole (Roll-call vote) + 52/14/0 RESULTS BY ROLL-CALL Roll-call: Resolution on the ruling of the ECJ of 16 July 2020 - Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximilian Schrems 2020-2789_RSP – Final vote 53 + NI Laura Ferrara, Martin Sonneborn, Milan Uhrík PPE Magdalena Adamowicz, Vladimír Bilčík, Vasile Blaga, Lena Düpont, Andrzej Halicki, Jeroen Lenaers, Lukas Mandl, Nuno Melo, Roberta Metsola, Nadine Morano, Emil Radev, Paulo Rangel, Ralf Seekatz, Sara Skyttedal, Tomas Tobé, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Javier Zarzalejos Renew Malik Azmani, Olivier Chastel, Sophia in 't Veld, Fabienne Keller, Nathalie Loiseau, Maite Pagazaurtundúa, Michal Šimečka, Ramona Strugariu, Hilde Vautmans S&D Katarina Barley, Pietro Bartolo, Caterina Chinnici, Maria Grapini, Sylvie Guillaume, Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Łukasz Kohut, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Franco Roberti, Birgit Sippel, Bettina Vollath The Left Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Cornelia Ernst, Miguel Urbán Crespo Verts/ALE Patrick Breyer, Saskia Bricmont, Damien Carême, Gwendoline Delbos- Corfield, Terry Reintke, Diana Riba i Giner, Tineke Strik 1 - ID Marcel de Graaff 12 0 ECR Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Patryk Jaki, Assita Kanko, Nicola Procaccini, Jadwiga Wiśniewska ID Nicolas Bay, Nicolaus Fest, Jean-Paul Garraud, Peter Kofod, Annalisa Tardino, Tom Vandendriessche Roll-call: Draft recommendation for second reading on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online (2018/0331(COD)) – Vote on the draft recommendation 52 + ECR Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Patryk Jaki, Assita Kanko, Nicola Procaccini, Jadwiga Wiśniewska ID Nicolas Bay, Nicolaus Fest, Jean-Paul Garraud, Peter Kofod, Annalisa Tardino, Tom Vandendriessche NI Laura Ferrara PPE Magdalena Adamowicz, Vladimír Bilčík, Vasile Blaga, Lena Düpont, Andrzej Halicki, Jeroen Lenaers, Lukas Mandl, Nuno Melo, Roberta Metsola, Nadine Morano, Emil Radev, Paulo Rangel, Ralf Seekatz, Sara Skyttedal, Tomas Tobé, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Javier Zarzalejos Renew Malik Azmani, Olivier Chastel, Sophia in 't Veld, Fabienne Keller, Nathalie Loiseau, Maite Pagazaurtundúa, Michal Šimečka, Ramona Strugariu, Hilde Vautmans S&D Katarina Barley, Pietro Bartolo, Caterina Chinnici, Maria Grapini, Sylvie Guillaume, Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Łukasz Kohut, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Franco Roberti, Birgit Sippel, Bettina Vollath 14 - ID Marcel de Graaff NI Martin Sonneborn, Milan Uhrík The Left Konstantinos Arvanitis, Pernando Barrena Arza, Cornelia Ernst, Miguel Urbán Crespo Verts/ALE Patrick Breyer, Saskia Bricmont, Damien Carême, Gwendoline Delbos- Corfield, Terry Reintke, Diana Riba i Giner, Tineke Strik .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Result of (Roll-Call) Votes
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Result of (roll-call) votes LIBE voting session 4 February 2021 Concerned AM Tabled by Remarks Rapp Vote text LIBE Opinion on a European data strategy (2020/2017(INI)) (Marina Kaljurand) Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote) + 60/3/4 LIBE Opinion on Shaping the digital future of Europe (2020/2216(INI)) (Annalisa Tardino) Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote) + 48/1/4 Opinion on EU-UK TCA in form of letter (2020/0382(NLE)) (Juan Fernando López Aguilar) Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote) + 47/8/12 RESULTS BY ROLL-CALL Roll-call: LIBE Opinion on a European data strategy (2020/2017(INI)) – Final vote 60 + ECR Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Patryk Jaki, Assita Kanko, Nicola Procaccini, Jadwiga Wiśniewska ID Nicolaus Fest, Peter Kofod, Annalisa Tardino NI Laura Ferrara, Martin Sonneborn PPE Magdalena Adamowicz, Vladimír Bilčík, Vasile Blaga, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Lena Düpont, Andrzej Halicki, Balázs Hidvéghi, Lívia Járóka, Jeroen Lenaers, Lukas Mandl, Nuno Melo, Roberta Metsola, Nadine Morano, Emil Radev, Paulo Rangel, Ralf Seekatz, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský Renew Malik Azmani, Anna Júlia Donáth, Sophia in 't Veld, Moritz Körner, Maite Pagazaurtundúa, Michal Šimečka, Ramona Strugariu, Dragoş Tudorache S&D Pietro Bartolo, Delara Burkhardt, Caterina Chinnici, Maria Grapini, Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Łukasz Kohut, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Isabel Santos, Birgit Sippel, Bettina
    [Show full text]
  • Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of The
    Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of the European Council, Dear President of the European Commission and Dear President of the French Republic, We all have a responsibility for the shared future of Europe. In this time of crisis, it is high time to re-evaluate some of the rules we have upheld till now and focus on the most important aspects of the European project, which will help us move forward. An unprecedented health crisis is currently affecting millions of people in Europe and tragically taking thousands of lives. However, this is not the end. The economic crisis will crush the hopes and dreams of generations of Europeans. We sincerely hope that we will all do whatever is in our power not to leave anyone behind. We firmly believe that the European Parliament needs to take on its responsibility and share the burden since it is the highest European directly elected body. We need to be part of the solution, not part of the problem. If we want the people to have confidence and trust in the European project, we need to show them that we are also ready to make concessions. Therefore, we would like to ask you to do everything in your power to change the treaties in order to have just a single seat of the Parliament in Brussels. This call has again gained a large majority of support in the 2018 Parliament discharge resolution adopted on 13 May 2020 and shall now be taken into account and acted upon. The financial and environmental costs of moving the Parliament are, especially in these times of digitally connected Europe, extremely high and hard to justify.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf
    Question for written answer E-004735/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Pierre Karleskind (Renew), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Fredrick Federley (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Nicolae Ştefănuță (Renew), Moritz Körner (Renew), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Renew), Samira Rafaela (Renew), Radka Maxová (Renew), Liesje Schreinemacher (Renew), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Anne-Sophie Pelletier (GUE/NGL), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (S&D), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Eleonora Evi (NI), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Maria Arena (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Arba Kokalari (PPE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Catherine Chabaud (Renew), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Mauri Pekkarinen (Renew), Billy Kelleher (Renew), Andrus Ansip (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Asger Christensen (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Stéphane Bijoux (Renew), José Ramón Bauzá Díaz (Renew), Stéphane Séjourné (Renew), Svenja Hahn (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), Katalin Cseh (Renew), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Jan- Christoph Oetjen (Renew), Claudia Gamon (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Ramona Strugariu (Renew), Isabel Santos (S&D), Valérie Hayer (Renew), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Maria Walsh (PPE), Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D), Linea Søgaard-Lidell (Renew), Mario Furore (NI), Clara Aguilera (S&D), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Jakop G.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiopodlasie.Pl Wygenerowano W Dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22
    Radiopodlasie.pl Wygenerowano w dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22 Kto wejdzie do PE? Karol Karski, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Adam Bielan, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Elżbieta Kruk i Beata Mazurek(PiS), Tomasz Frankowski, Jarosław Kalinowski i Krzysztof Hetman (KE)- najprawdopodobniej wejdą do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Wszyscy kandydowali w okręgach obejmujących nasz region. Prognozy są oparte na sondażu exit-poll, co oznacza, że nazwiska kandydatów, którzy obejmą mandaty, mogą się jeszcze zmienić. Prawdopodobne nazwiska europarlamentarzystów podaje Informacyjna Agencja Radiowa. Prawo i Sprawiedliwość zdobyło najwięcej, 42,4 procent głosów, w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego - wynika z sondażu exit-poll zrealizowanego przez IPSOS dla telewizji TVP, Polsat i TVN. Drugie miejsce w badaniu prowadzonym dziś przed lokalami wyborczymi zajęła Koalicja Europejska - 39,1 procent. Jeśli wyniki sondażu potwierdzą się, do Parlamentu Europejskiego dostaną się także kandydaci Wiosny - 6,6 procent oraz Konfederacji - 6,1 procent. Pięcioprocentowego prgu nie przekroczyły komitety Kukiz'15 - 4,1 procent oraz Lewica Razem - 1,3 procent. Prognozowana frekwencja wyniosła 43 procent - wynika z sondażu exit-poll. Zgodnie z sondażem, Prawo i Sprawiedliwość wygrało w siedmiu okręgach (warmińsko-mazurskie z podlaskim, Mazowsze, Łódzkie, Lubelskie, Podkarpacie, Małopolska ze Świętokrzyskiem oraz Śląsk). W sześciu okręgach wygrała Koalicja Europejska (Pomorze, kujawsko-pomorskie, Warszawa, Wielkopolska, Dolny Śląsk z Opolszczyzną oraz Lubuskie z Zachodniopomorskim). Z prognozy podziału mandatów wynika, że przy takich wynikach, jakie przyniósł sondaż exit-poll, PiS miałby w Parlamencie Europejskim 24 mandaty, Koalicja Europejska - 22 mandaty, a Wiosna i Konfederacja - po trzy mandaty. Zgodnie z sondażem, w okręgu obejmującym Pomorze dwa mandaty zdobyła Koalicja Europejska (Magdalena Adamowicz oraz najprawdopodobniej Janusz Lewandowski), a jeden Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (najprawdopodobniej Anna Fotyga).
    [Show full text]
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria Da Graça
    12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Deirdre Clune, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Hildegard Bentele, Vladimír Bilčík, Daniel Caspary, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Geoffroy Didier, Jarosław Duda, José Manuel Fernandes, Loucas Fourlas, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Esteban González Pons, Christophe Hansen, György Hölvényi, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Seán Kelly, Arba Kokalari, Ewa Kopacz, Andrius Kubilius, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Leopoldo López Gil, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Aušra Maldeikienė, Lukas Mandl, Liudas Mažylis, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Nadine Morano, Marlene Mortler, Janina Ochojska, Markus Pieper, Jessica Polfjärd, Christian Sagartz, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Christine Schneider, Ralf Seekatz, Sara Skyttedal, Tomas Tobé, Eugen Tomac, Sabine Verheyen, Maria Walsh, Jörgen Warborn, Angelika Winzig, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Javier Zarzalejos, Željana Zovko, Milan Zver, Gabriel Mato, Henna Virkkunen, Franc Bogovič, Andrzej Halicki, Michael Gahler, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Tom Berendsen, Peter Pollák, Siegfried Mureşan, Peter Liese, David Lega, Pernille Weiss, Tomasz Frankowski, Lena Düpont, Magdalena Adamowicz, Dennis Radtke, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Radosław Sikorski, Traian Băsescu, Stefan Berger, Michaela Šojdrová Report A9-0115/2021 Mónica Silvana González Impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations in developing countries (2020/2042(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 - introductory part Motion for a resolution Amendment
    [Show full text]
  • En En ***Ii Recommendation for Second Reading
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0146/2021 26.4.2021 ***II RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading in a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Justice Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1382/2013 (06834/1/2020 – C9-0138/2021 – 2018/0208(COD)) Committee on Legal Affairs Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteurs: Heidi Hautala, Katharina Barley RR\1230082EN.docx PE691.378v02-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_COD_2app Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column. The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Interim Report
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0138/2020 20.7.2020 INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law (COM(2017)0835 – 2017/0360R(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Juan Fernando López Aguilar RR\1210506EN.docx PE650.665v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_Consent_Interim CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.............................................3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................24 ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT..................................................................................................................29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY.30 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ...................................................................38 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ....................................39 PE650.665v03-00 2/39 RR\1210506EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law (COM(2017)0835 – 2017/0360R(NLE)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0835), – having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 2 and Article 7(1) thereof,
    [Show full text]
  • Analiza „Lokomotyw” – Wiek, Wykształcenie, Kadencje
    Table 1 Imię i nazwisko Region Lista Miejsce na liście Wiek Stanowiska w polityce <- Jeśli tak, to jak? Krajowe Unijne lub Stopień akademicki <- Jaki? Kadencje w Sejmie lub Kadencje w PE Związany z regionem (Z) zagranicznej lub unijne międzynarodowe Senacie czy „spadochroniarz” (S) (nie licząc funkcji europosła) Radosław Sikorski Kujawsko-Pomorskie KE 1 56 T Szef MSZ x N - 3 - Z Elżbieta Łukacijewska Podkarpackie KE 2 52 T Przewodniczącą Podkomisji x N - 3 2 Z stałej do spraw monitorowania pozyskiwania i wykorzystania środków z funduszy z Unii Europejskiej. Należała do zgromadzenia parlamentarnego polsko- ukraińskiego Andrzej Halicki Mazowsze KE 2 57 T W 2012–2015 był x N - 4 - S przedstawicielem parlamentu w Zgromadzeniu Parlamentarnym Rady Europy Leszek Miller Wielkopolska KE 2 72 T przewodniczący Komitetu x N - 5 - Z Integracji Europejskiej Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz Warszawa KE 1 68 T Szef MSZ, przewodniczący x T Doktor nauk prawnych 7 - Z Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej Janina Ochojska Dolnośląskie-Opole KE 1 63 T Założycielka Polskiej Akcji x N - - - S Humanitarnej Jerzy Buzek Śląsk KE 1 78 T Przewodniczący Parlamentu x T Profesor nauk technicznych 1 3 Z Europejskiego, Przewodniczący Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej Czesław Siekierski Podkarpackie KE 1 66 T przewodniczący Komisji x T Doktor nauk ekonomicznych 2 3 Z Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi PE Bogusław Liberadzki Zachodniopomorskie- KE 1 70 T Wiceprzewodniczący PE, x T Profesor nauk 2 4 Z Lubuskie Stały obserwator Polski w ekonomicznych PE Janusz Lewandowski Pomorze KE 1 67 T Komisarz UE ds. budżetu i x T Doktor nauk 3 3 Z programowania ekonomicznych, publicysta finansowego Róża Thun Małopolska-Świętokrzyskie KE 1 64 T dyrektor Przedstawicielstwa x N - - 2 Z Komisji Europejskiej w Polsce Marek Belka Łódź KE 1 67 T przewodniczący Komitetu x T profesor nauk - - Z Integracji Europejskiej, ekonomicznych dyrektor Departamentu Europejskiego Międzynarodowego Funduszu Walutowego, sekretarza wykonawczy Europejskiej Komisji Gospodarczej ONZ Henryka Bochniarz Podlaskie - Warmińsko- KE 1 71 T Była członkinią m.in.
    [Show full text]
  • E-9-2021-002511 EN.Pdf
    Question for written answer E-002511/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Janina Ochojska (PPE), Andrzej Halicki (PPE), Krzysztof Hetman (PPE), Jarosław Kalinowski (PPE), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska (PPE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Danuta Maria Hübner (PPE), Tomasz Frankowski (PPE), Róża Thun und Hohenstein (PPE) Subject: Evaluation of Poland's draft National Recovery Plan On 3 May 2021, the Polish Government submitted a draft National Recovery Plan to the Commission. The draft must then be assessed by the Commission, based on the criteria listed in the Regulation establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility. These criteria include effectively addressing the challenges identified under the European Semester (as one of the criteria for assessing adequacy), ensuring effective monitoring and implementation of the recovery plan (as one of the criteria for effectiveness) and contributing to the prevention of corruption, fraud and conflicts of interest (as one of the criteria for efficiency). One of the EU Council’s recommendations to Poland for the European Semester 2020 is to improve the investment climate, in particular by protecting the independence of the courts. 1. How does the Commission assess the changes made by the Polish Government to the judiciary in the context of protecting the independence of the courts? 2. In view of Poland's refusal to cooperate with the European Public Prosecutor's Office, which is tasked with investigating offences against the EU budget, and Poland's challenge to the Regulation on the protection of the Union's budget in the event of a breach by a Member State of the rule of law, how does the Commission assess the likelihood of ensuring the effective monitoring of the recovery plan, particularly at the level of final beneficiaries (including local authorities), and of its contribution towards preventing corruption, including political corruption? PE693.256v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Roll Call Votes 3 September 2019
    Committee on Budgets Result of roll-call votes of 3 September 2019 Table of Contents 1. Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 1/2019 of the European Union for the financial year 2019, entering the surplus of the financial year 2018 - 2019/2021(BUD) - John Howarth - final vote.........................................................page 2 2. Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 2/2019 of the European Union for the financial year 2019 – Reinforcement of key programmes for EU competitiveness: Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+ - 2019/2022(BUD) - John Howarth- final vote...........................................................................................................................page 3 3. Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Romania, Italy and Austria - 2019/2023(BUD) - Siegfried Mureşan - final vote....page 4 4. Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 3/2019 of the European Union to the general budget 2019 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Romania, Italy and Austria - 2019/2024(BUD) - John Howarth - final vote.........................................................page 5 5. Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF/2019/000 TA 2019 - Technical assistance at the initiative
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on the Draft Council Implementing Decision on The
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0100/2020 8.5.2020 * REPORT on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in the United Kingdom (14247/2019 – C9-0198/2019 – 2019/0819(CNS)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Juan Fernando López Aguilar RR\1204849EN.docx PE647.041v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_CNS_LegAct_rej Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column. The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced.
    [Show full text]