Wasson Way: Corridor Urban Framework Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wasson Way: Corridor Urban Framework Plan Wasson Way: Corridor Urban Framework Plan Integrated Design I 20 CVE 5002 – 001 Spring Semester 2014 Instructors: Dr. Miller and Dr. Russell Group 3A Josh Cones, Cathleen, Consilio, and Eric Hahn February 14th 2014 Abstract This paper aims to integrally establish the Wasson Way trail with current Withrow facilities, Rookwood Commons and Pavilion, and Hyde Park Square, as well as the proposed transit hub and re-development of Hyde Park Station. This will be done while promoting a sustainable and safe environment for both pedestrians and bicyclists alike, especially at the Madison and Edwards Road crossings. Engineering problems, applicable standards, and case studies were highlighted to isolate areas along the Wasson Way corridor in order to accomplish the framework and overall feel of the proposed design area. Specifically, there were four main problems that need engineering solutions in order for the Wasson Way corridor to successfully integrate into the existing community. Engineering interventions and suggestions were given for these problems. Access into Rookwood Commons and Pavilion, designing and laying out a proposed transit hub, implementing a safe and functional intersection crossing of Madison and Edwards Road, and retrofitting existing conditions to incorporate a proposed Hyde-Park Square- Madison Park-Withrow High School loop were the engineering problems addressed. i Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………… i List of Figures...……..………………………………………………………. iii Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 1 Withrow Recreational Area Access…………………………………………. 1 Withrow High School Access……………………………………………….. 3 Grovedale Place Railway Bridge…..……..…………..…………………….. 6 Rookwood Commons and Pavilion Access……….……………………….... 8 Transit Hub…………………………………………..……………………… 12 Crossing at Madison and Edwards Road………………………….………… 15 Hyde Park Square-Madison Park-Withrow High School Loop………..……. 21 Hyde Park Station Remodel……………………....…………………………. 26 Summary and Conclusions.…………………………………………………. 29 References…………………………………………………………………… 30 Appendix A………………………………………………………………….. 32 Appendix B………………………………………………………………….. 33 Appendix C………………………………………………………………….. 34 Appendix D………………………………………………………………….. 41 ii List of Figures Figure 1…………………………..……....…………………………………… 1 Figure 2…………………………..……....…………………………………… 2 Figure 3…………………………..……....…………………………………… 4 Figure 4…………………………..……....…………………………………… 5 Figure 5…………………………..……....…………………………………… 7 Figure 6…………………………..……....…………………………………… 9 Figure 7…………………………..……....…………………………………… 10 Figure 8…………………………..……....…………………………………… 11 Figure 9…………………………..……....…………………………………… 11 Figure 10.………………………..……....…………………………………… 13 Figure 11.………………………..……....…………………………………… 13 Figure 12.………………………..……....…………………………………… 13 Figure 13.………………………..……....…………………………………… 14 Figure 14.………………………..……....…………………………………… 15 Figure 15.………………………..……....…………………………………… 16 Figure 16.………………………..……....…………………………………… 17 Figure 17.………………………..……....…………………………………… 18 Figure 18.………………………..……....…………………………………… 19 Figure 19.………………………..……....…………………………………… 20 Figure 20.………………………..……....…………………………………… 20 Figure 21.………………………..……....…………………………………… 22 Figure 22.………………………..……....…………………………………… 23 Figure 23.………………………..……....…………………………………… 23 Figure 24.………………………..……....…………………………………… 24 Figure 25.………………………..……....…………………………………… 25 Figure 26.………………………..……....…………………………………… 25 Figure 27.………………………..……....…………………………………… 27 Figure 28.………………………..……....…………………………………… 27 Figure 29.………………………..……....…………………………………… 28 iii Introduction This paper analyzes the stretch of Wasson Way referred to as Section 3 that begins immediately east of I-71 and ends at Hyde Park Avenue and Wasson Road. Specifically, the paper aims to integrally establish the Wasson Way trail with current Withrow facilities, Rookwood Commons and Pavilion, and Hyde Park Square, as well as the proposed transit hub and re-development of Hyde Park Station. This will be done while promoting a sustainable and safe environment for both pedestrians and bicyclists alike, especially at the Madison and Edwards Road crossings. Engineering problems, applicable standards, and case studies were highlighted for each isolated area along the Wasson Way corridor in order to accomplish the framework and overall feel of the proposed Section 3 area design. Impacts regarding social, user, and economic issues as well as sustainability are also vital aspects to the success of Wasson Way. Eight key focal points were chosen within Section 3 to investigate the aforementioned principles. These elements include access to the Withrow recreational facilities, access toWithrow High School, the Grovdale Place bridge, access to Rookwood Commons and Pavilion, the proposed transit hub, the Madison and Edwards Road crossings, the proposed Hyde-Park Square-Madison Park-Withrow High School Loop, and the proposed Hyde Park Station remodels. Withrow Recreational Area Access The Withrow recreational facilities are located on the far west side of this study area. They are located just north of Withrow High School, and is bordered by residential neighborhoods on the other three sides. This facility provides the public with four open baseball fields, eight tennis courts, and abundant green space for other activities. The limited access makes it difficult for families and youth to utilize the available facilities. Wasson Way cuts directly through the north face of this property, allowing for a great entrance point to the area. Currently, there is tree line and vegetation between the recreational facilities and Wasson Way, but access points are available. A walking track surrounding the facility has been brought up from several community members as a possible addition to enhance what this facility has to offer. Figure 1 below details the existing geographic layout of the facilities and possible access points from the Wasson Way Trail. 1 Figure 1 Several applicable standards are available to help design and implement the trail project that runs past Withrow recreation facilities. AASHTO offers two guides to help engineer the project. These guides are called the AASHTO: Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, and AASHTO: Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Other useful standards can be found using the NACTO: Urban Bikeway Design Guide as a reference. There are several engineering problems that face the Withrow recreational facilities. The current trail is raised up from the Withrow grounds approximately 7 feet from field measurements. The transition from the trail to the grounds has to be gradual enough for safe bike and pedestrian access from the trail to the facilities. On each side of the pathway, a graded shoulder area of 3 to 5 feet wide with a maximum cross-slope of 1 vertical to 6 horizontal should be maintained according to AASHTO (2012). The access point would need to be graded to provide a safe transition from the trail to the facility entrance. There currently is a transition from the trail to the northeast corner of the facility created from years of people cutting through off the abandoned tracks. This is a proposed access point to the facility from Wasson Way. This path can be paved to tie into the walking track that goes around the perimeter of the facility. This provides an easy transition from the trail to the events and activities offered by the recreational facility. There is easy access for construction crews to pave the access point, as the contractors can utilize the open space offered by the Withrow grounds. Another engineering problem would be how to light and clearly label where the access point is located. Currently, the built up trees and vegetation between the recreational facilities and Wasson Way would cause great interference for riders on the trail to locate the access point. Signage could be used to clearly indicate the point of entrance. Signs starting 2 miles away can start indicating to riders of the upcoming facility, and as they get closer, the reminders can get more frequent. Lighting the area and the entrance will highlight the area for riders to easily navigate the access point. The 2 proposed access point from Wasson Way is shown in Figure 2 below taken during a reconnaissance visit to the area. Figure 2 The Midtown Greenway Trail in Minneapolis, Minnesota is great case study for a best practice involving tying into a green space. The Hennepin County, the county where the park is located, provided the land and funded the construction of the trail entrance ramp (Current, 2014). The area, called the Cepro Site, offers swing sets, winter sledding, benches, and many more recreational features. Thousands of people each year enjoy the year round activities provided by the Cepro Site. The success of this tie-in to a recreational facility from a bike path gives the Wasson Way reason to consider creating the access point into the Withrow recreational facility. There are numerous impacts involved with tying into the Withrow recreation facility from Wasson Way. By creating easy access for people to meet to play games or activities, the social impact is very positive. Tying into the recreational facility offers the public a way to engage in community activities. The City of Des Moines Bicycle and Trail Master Plan included this in their design, and augmented the bicycle trail network with activities to encourage trail use (City, 2011). People can develop relationships, and create bonds with people in the neighborhood that share common interests. These interests could range
Recommended publications
  • Town of Surfside PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA October 25, 2018 – 6:00 P.M
    Town of Surfside PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA October 25, 2018 – 6:00 p.m. Town Hall Commission Chambers – 9293 Harding Ave, 2nd Floor, Surfside, FL 33154 Rule 7.05 Decorum. Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the commission shall be barred from further appearance before the commission by the presiding officer, unless permission to continue or again address the commission is granted by the majority vote of the commission members present. No clapping, applauding, heckling or verbal outbursts in support or opposition to a speaker or his or her remarks shall be permitted. Signs or placards may be disallowed in the commission chamber by the presiding officer. Persons exiting the commission chambers shall do so quietly. Any person who received compensation, remuneration or expenses for conducting lobbying activities is required to register as a lobbyist with the Town Clerk prior to engaging in lobbying activities per Town Code Sec. 2-235. "Lobbyist" specifically includes the principal, as defined in this section, as well as any agent, officer or employee of a principal, regardless of whether such lobbying activities fall within the normal scope of employment of such agent, officer or employee. The term "lobbyist" specifically excludes any person who only appears as a representative of a not-for-profit community-based organization for the purpose of requesting a grant without special compensation or reimbursement for the appearance; and any person who only appears as a representative of a neighborhood, homeowners or condominium association without compensation for the appearance, whether direct or indirect or contingent, to express support of or opposition to any item.
    [Show full text]
  • Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio
    Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio Dublin Mobility Plan Phase II Final Report City of Dublin, Ohio June 2018 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i DUBLIN MOBILITY STUDY | PHASE II REPORT CITY OF DUBLIN, OH Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2 Complete Streets...................................................................................................... 2 Why Enact a Complete Streets Policy? ..................................................................................................2 MORPC Complete Streets Toolkit............................................................................................................3 Going Above and Beyond MORPC’s Toolkit.........................................................................................5 Implementation & Next Steps ..................................................................................................................8 3 Shuttles and Circulators ............................................................................................ 9 Concept Overview......................................................................................................................................9 Support for a Dublin Circulator ............................................................................................................ 10 Conventional Circulator Case Studies.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 12-2016 Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB Brittany Whalen California State University, Monterey Bay Ryan Blackman California State University, Monterey Bay Monica Mata California State University, Monterey Bay Madi Hare California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all Recommended Citation Whalen, Brittany; Blackman, Ryan; Mata, Monica; and Hare, Madi, "Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB" (2016). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 67. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/67 This Capstone Project (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects and Master's Theses at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Brittany Whalen Ryan Blackman Monica Mata Madi Hare Daniel Fernandez, PhD. ENSTU 471 Fall 2016 Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB Introduction Bike-share programs are alternate forms of transportation most commonly found on college campuses or in city centers. These programs allow citizens, visitors, students and others to check-out a bike from a self-serve station and take it from point A to point B. Bike-share programs have grown worldwide at an increasing rate within the past decade. Image 1 shows that in 2001 there were only four worldwide cities that adopted a bike-share program, but that number dramatically increased from the years 2002 to 2014, when there were eight-hundred and fifty-five worldwide cities with bike-share programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Everyone needs a (ride) buddy sometimes. Photo by: Deo Martinez FINAL REPORT Ride Buddy Pilot Program for State of Ohio Employees Working in Downtown Columbus MEREDITH J REED, YAY BIKES! BRIDGETTE MCCULLOUGH, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Circle up! Photo by: Ben Ko TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 3 THE CHALLENGE | 6 OUR SOLUTION | 9 PROGRAM OUTCOMES | 14 LESSONS & SUSTAINABILITY | 19 APPENDIX | 22 Page | 2 A ride with Wellness Ambassadors. Photo by: Ben Ko EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State of Ohio employees discover the benefits of bicycle commuting thanks to the Yay Bikes! Ride Buddy program. Page | 3 In 2017, the Ohio Department of Health partnered with local nonprofit Yay Bikes! to encourage bicycle commuting by state agency employees, with the ultimate goal of increasing daily physical activity. 64 employees from 10 state agencies participated in one- hour bike rides led by seasoned commuter cyclists, in which ride leaders modeled how to ride in traffic, explained rules of the road, and introduced local bicycling amenities such Park & Pedal locations and CoGo Bike Share. Post-ride surveys and unsolicited feedback reveal participants gained significant levels of knowledge and confidence from the experience, were inspired to change their behavior, and shared what they learned with others. One rider reported being stunned by the beauty of riding down High Street. Photo by: Deo Martinez “I was pleasantly surprised at how much motorists were cooperating with us. Also, we rode streets that I would have never ridden on because they look too ‘busy’.” “[My favorite part was] Getting out of the office and back on a bike; been too long.” “[I was surprised by] How easy it is to ride during lunch hour.” — Ride participants Page | 4 Key Program Findings Surveys revealed that ride participants: Had a great time: The average rating for the experience was 4.3 on a 5-point scale (between “Great” and “Excellent”).
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Feasibility Study Public Engagement Appendix
    St. Louis Bike Share Study Public Engagement Appendix Appendix 1 – Engagement Summaries (p.2) Appendix 2 – Bike Share Surveys (p.42) Appendix 3 – On-line Suggested Station Locations (p.77) St. Louis Bike Share Study – Public Engagement Appendix Appendix 1 – Engagement Summaries December 2014 / Page 2 St. Louis Bike Share Study – Public Engagement Appendix St. Louis Bike Share Public and Stakeholder Engagement Summary May 2014 Background Great Rivers Greenway is investigating the operational and financial feasibility of implementing a bike share program in St. Louis. The study, led by Alta Planning + Design, includes a feasibility study, business plan and implementation strategy, which will: • Identify target areas and station locations suited to supporting the successful implementation of a bike share program; • Estimate the potential size and scope of a bike share system; • Recommend the optimal business model (system technology, ownership structure, operating conditions and funding options); and • Recommend a blueprint and timeline for a possible launch and operations of bike share in St. Louis. The Engagement Schedule During the week of May 12, Great Rivers Greenway formally introduced the St. Louis Bike Share Study to the public and the project’s Technical Advisory and Citizen and Business Advisory Committees. The public website, ( ) was launched which included information on the project scope and basic information on bike share programs, an online survey and a map for identifying possible bike share stations. On May 14, the first public open house was conducted at the Judith and Dennis Jones Visitor and Education Center in Forest Park from 4:00 to 7:00 pm. The next day, at Webster University’s Downtown Campus, Great Rivers Greenway hosted a Downtown Briefing from 7:30 to 8:30 am, followed by a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting from 10 to 11:30 am.
    [Show full text]
  • January 16Th
    The Northland Community Council General Meeting: Jan 8, 2019 Meeting Minutes & Attendance Report Prepared By: Roger Davidson Met requirements for Quorum: Yes www.columbusncc.org – [email protected] Attendance Report 2019 Perfect Attendance 19/24 Suspended From Voting 0/24 2019 GENERAL MEETING ATTENDANCE MEMBER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Albany Park X Asherton Grove X Blendon Chase X Blendon Woods 1 Clinton Estates X Cooper Woods X Devonshire X Forest Park X Friendship Village X Karmel Woodward Pk X Lee & Ulry 1 Maize Morse Tri-Area X Minerva Park X Northland Alliance 1 NABA 1 Parkshire Commons X Preston Commons X The Village of Preston Woods X Rolling Ridge X Salem X Sharon Woods X Strawberry Farms X Waltham X Woodstream East 1 SUSPENDED & MISSED SUSPENDED & ATTENDED GOOD STANDING NUMBERS DENOTE CONSECUTIVE MISSES KEY SUSPENSION A MEMBER IN GREEN HAS PERFECT A MEMBER IN RED TEXT HAS BEEN (voting privileges forfeiture) ATTENDANCE FOR THE YEAR NOTIFIED OF EXPULSION ELIGIBILITY Meeting Minutes Meeting Called to Order: 7:00PM Roll Call Roll was taken. See above chart for details. Liaison Reports Columbus Fire Department No report Station 24 Car thefts will be going up due to warming up the engines, please pass it along. Don’t leave your car unattended. Eric Jones – Delaware County officers were chasing a stolen car that ended in Strawberry Farms, suspects got away on foot. But Delaware County officers are reported to know who they are and will be tracking them down. Next Block Watch Coordinator’s meeting will be 19th March, (3rd Tuesday of the month).
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Launch Life Downtown from a Neighborhood Perspective 2014
    Neighborhood Launch life downtown from a neighborhood perspective 2014 Walk, CoGo or CBUS? Getting around downtown has never been easier. Alternative modes of transportation have come to Columbus offering residents great options to get around and dump their cars. CoGo Bike Share is a bicycle-sharing program that West Sycamore Street in the Brewery District. The free allows users to take bikes from one destination to another price is set through the end of 2014. in 30 minute intervals. CoGo Bike stations are located in many locations around the city. For more information The buses along the route will run every 10 minutes about the service, visit cogobikeshare.com. during the day Monday through Thursday, and every 15 minutes in the evenings from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. On Fridays Car2Go, a car sharing service featuring SmartCars, and Saturdays, service will continue until midnight and is another alternative. At .38 cents a minute, which on Sundays buses will run every 15 minutes from 10:30 includes gas, insurance and parking, it’s a bargain. For a.m. to 6 p.m. more information visit Columbus.car2go.com. Uber is a ride-sharing service involving private cars. Using an app, riders are connected with the drivers of cars. Payment is processed straight from your smartphone app. For more information or to get the app, visit uber. com/cities/Columbus. COTA offers a free Downtown circulator bus (starting May 5), called CBUS. Riders can board one of the specially-branded buses and ride for free on a route that stretches from East 3rd Avenue in the Short North to Current Projects Bishop’s Walk Phase II Construction of the second phase of Bishop’s Walk is underway.
    [Show full text]
  • USDOT Region V Regional University Transportation Center Final Report
    MN WI MI OH IL IN USDOT Region V Regional University Transportation Center Final Report NEXTRANS Project No. “Methods for Improving Bicycle Sharing System Balance” (170OSUY2.2) By Morton E. O’Kelly Professor & Chair Department of Geography The Ohio State University [email protected] DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NEXTRANS Center, Purdue University under Grant No. DTRT12‐G‐UTC05 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST‐R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. MN WI MI OH IL IN USDOT Region V Regional University Transportation Center Final Report TECHNICAL SUMMARY NEXTRANS Project No. 170OSUY2.2 Final Report, 12/2/2016 Methods for Improving Bicycle Sharing System Balance Introduction Many cities have developed bicycle sharing systems. This project points out that a key element in their success and sustainability is an understanding of the spatial patterns of supply and demand. This project tackles the re‐balancing issue where bikes must be removed from full stations and replenished at empty ones. Taking inspiration from the lot size problem, and capacitated vehicle routing, the project devises a rolling window approach to this problem, in essence representing the amount of foresight that the system planner can use to determine solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucson Bike Share Report
    TUCSON BIKE SHARE Feasibility Study Report July 2015 Tucson Bike Share Feasibility Study CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. BIKE SHARE SYSTEM REVIEW .................................................................................................................... 5 What is Bike Share? .................................................................................................................................. 5 Elements of Bike Share ............................................................................................................................. 8 Peer Programs ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Potential Benefits and Risks .................................................................................................................... 23 Summary of Benefits and Risks ............................................................................................................... 31 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................... 33 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMAND ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 36 Physical Conditions ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 091520-Minutes Slac
    SLAC Purpose Statement To serve as a liaison between neighborhood groups, property owners, residents, developers, and city officials SOUTH LINDEN AREA COMMISSION (SLAC) SOUTH LINDEN NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARY Khadijah LaNai Ashe’ Standing Committee: Lawrence Calloway, Chair Education and Workforce Development Sundi Corner Health and Wellness Lois Ferguson Public Safety and Transportation Michelle Jamison Retail and Small Business Development Mayo Makinde Special Events Peggy Williams, Secretary/Zoning Chair Zoning and Code Enforcement MINUTES Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:00pm – 8:50pm Regular meeting Number 06-2020 of the South Linden Area Commission, Tuesday, September 15th was Called To Order by Chair Calloway at 6:17pm. Invocation led by Pastor Timothy Liggins of Bethel A.M.E. Church Pledge of Allegiance led by Commissioner Williams COMMISSIONER ROLL CALL Present: Khadijah Lanai Ashe, Lawrence Calloway, Michelle Jamison, Mayo MaKinde, and Peggy Williams Excused: Sundi Corner Absent: Lois Ferguson QUORUM STATUS: NOT PRESENT Based on the Commissioner Roll Call at 6:17pm this date, the quorum requirement of six (6) commissioners in attendance was not met; however, based on By-Law Article V the Area Commission meeting can proceed with four or five commissioners present and time-sensitive matters reaching consensus and ratified during a subsequent meeting will be considered binding. ADMINISTRATION: Acceptance of Meeting Agenda For lack of quorum, no motion was made or carried to Voice Vote Approval of the Agenda dated September 15, 2020. Reading of the Minutes: . In addition to DRAFT of Minutes being previously distributed electronically to each Commissioner for review and comment, the Chair respectfully allowed three-minutes for additional review in this meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Ball State University and the City of Muncie
    BALL STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE CITY OF MUNCIE: BRINGING A BIKE SHARE TO THE COMMUNITY THROUGH FEDERAL FUNDING A CREATIVE PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTERS OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING BY JOSHUA L. CAMPBELL ADVISOR: LOHREN DEEG BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, IN JULY 2019 Ball State University and the City of Muncie: Bringing A Bike Share to The Community Through Federal Funding Abstract CREATIVE PROJECT: Ball State University and the City of Muncie: Bringing A Bike Share To The Community Through Federal Funding STUDENT: Joshua L. Campbell DEGREE: Masters of Urban and Regional Planning COLLEGE: Architecture and Planning DATE: July 2019 PAGES: 71 This project aims to show the history of bike share programs and how they have come to shape the different systems that are in existence in the world to date. Through this reference and examination of the history and case studies both local and international, a conclusion of the appropriate program for Ball State University and the City of Muncie will be determined. Upon selecting the proper system for the area in question, a federal grant will be written on behalf of Ball State University with the partnership of the City of Muncie to secure funding for the establishment of Ball Bikes, a locally operated bike share program that is aimed to promote bicycle usage and healthy lifestyles within the community. 2 Ball State University and the City of Muncie: Bringing A Bike Share to The Community Through Federal Funding Acknowledgments I owe a great deal of gratitude to many people who have taught, mentored, and befriended me over my past five years at Ball State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate and Professional Student Living Guide Roadmap: Graduate and Professional Student Living Guide
    2020 Graduate and Professional Student Living Guide Roadmap: Graduate and Professional Student Living Guide SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................. 3 Off-Campus and Commuter Student Services (OCCSS) ......................... 4 OCCSS Resources ....................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2: NEIGHBORHOODS .............................. 6 Introduction.................................................................................................. 7 Neighborhood Details ................................................................................. 8 Fast Facts and Community Features ......................................................... 8 SECTION 3: RENTAL TIMELINE AND TIPS . .......... 17 Action Steps for Your Housing Search .....................................................18 Living in Columbus ....................................................................................20 Tips for First Time Renters ........................................................................21 Off-Campus Housing Excellence Program .............................................22 SECTION 4: PARTNERED AND FAMILY LIVING ..... 23 Childcare .................................................................................................... 24 Parks and Pets ...........................................................................................25 Transportation ...........................................................................................26 SECTION 5: GRADUATE
    [Show full text]