DOCSLIB.ORG

Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio Dublin Mobility Plan Phase II Final Report City of Dublin, Ohio June 2018 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i DUBLIN MOBILITY STUDY | PHASE II REPORT CITY OF DUBLIN, OH Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2 Complete Streets...................................................................................................... 2 Why Enact a Complete Streets Policy? ..................................................................................................2 MORPC Complete Streets Toolkit............................................................................................................3 Going Above and Beyond MORPC’s Toolkit.........................................................................................5 Implementation & Next Steps ..................................................................................................................8 3 Shuttles and Circulators ............................................................................................ 9 Concept Overview......................................................................................................................................9 Support for a Dublin Circulator ............................................................................................................ 10 Conventional Circulator Case Studies.................................................................................................. 11 Emerging Models and Opportunities ................................................................................................... 19 Conceptual Recommendations............................................................................................................... 28 A Dublin Circulator Operations Plan.................................................................................................... 31 Implementation & Next Steps ............................................................................................................... 36 4 Bike Share ............................................................................................................ 37 Conventional Dock-Based Bike Share.................................................................................................. 37 Dockless Bike Share................................................................................................................................. 40 Comparison ............................................................................................................................................... 41 Implementation Steps .............................................................................................................................. 43 5 Wayfinding ........................................................................................................... 44 6 Mobility Hubs ....................................................................................................... 45 Hub Elements Overview.......................................................................................................................... 46 Mobility Hub Typology........................................................................................................................... 48 Design Concepts ....................................................................................................................................... 50 Table of Figures Page Figure 1 Philadelphia Complete Streets Checklist...............................................................................7 Figure 2 Grand Rapids DASH & Silver Line ...................................................................................... 11 Figure 3 DASH Operating, Performance, and Funding Characteristics ....................................... 12 Figure 4 The Hop Route ......................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 5 Hop Operating, Performance, and Funding Characteristics .......................................... 14 Figure 6 Port Town Trolley Route......................................................................................................... 15 Figure 7 Port Town Trolley Operating, Performance, and Funding Characteristics .................. 16 Figure 8 New Albany SmartRide Shuttles .......................................................................................... 16 Figure 9 SmartRide Operating, Performance, and Funding Characteristics ............................... 17 Figure 10 GREAT Route Map.................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 11 GREAT Operating, Performance, and Funding Characteristics ..................................... 19 Figure 12 Pickup by Capital Metro (Austin, TX) .................................................................................. 21 Figure 13 RideScout Route (Austin, TX) ................................................................................................. 22 Figure 14 The Downtowner (Manhattan Beach, CA) .......................................................................... 23 Figure 15 Free Ride Everywhere Downtown (FRED), San Diego, CA.............................................. 24 Figure 16 SC Rides Service Area and Signage (San Clemente, CA) ............................................. 25 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | i DUBLIN MOBILITY STUDY | PHASE II REPORT CITY OF DUBLIN, OH Figure 17 SC Rides Fare Breakdown .................................................................................................... 26 Figure 18 GoDublin (Dublin, CA)............................................................................................................ 26 Figure 19 Parkmerced Car-Free Living Website................................................................................ 27 Figure 20 Workforce Shuttle Route Concept ....................................................................................... 28 Figure 21 COTA Bus Service in or Near Dublin .................................................................................. 29 Figure 22 Federal, State, Regional, & Private Funding Resources.................................................. 30 Figure 23 Pilot Goals and Success Metrics........................................................................................... 32 Figure 24 Evaluation Methodology ....................................................................................................... 32 Figure 25 Proposed Service Area.......................................................................................................... 34 Figure 26 Headways/Response Times .................................................................................................. 35 Figure 27 Supply Versus Ridership ........................................................................................................ 37 Figure 28 Advantages and Challenges of the Dock-Based Systems .............................................. 38 Figure 29 CoGo Bike Share in Columbus ............................................................................................. 39 Figure 30 Zagster Bike Share at OSU .................................................................................................. 39 Figure 31 Advantages and Challenges of Dockless Bike Share Systems ...................................... 40 Figure 32 Docked and Dockless Bike Share System Comparison.................................................... 41 Figure 33 Customers Using Information Kiosk in Bremen, Germany ............................................... 45 Figure 34 Mobility Hubs Can Be as Simple or as Complex as they Need to Be ......................... 46 Figure 35 Mobility Hub Elements Overview......................................................................................... 47 Figure 36 Bridge Park Mobility Hub Concept ..................................................................................... 50 Figure 37 Campus - Community Center Mobility Hub ....................................................................... 51 Figure 38 Neighborhood Center Mobility Hub ................................................................................... 51 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | ii DUBLIN MOBILITY STUDY | PHASE II REPORT CITY OF DUBLIN, OH INTRODUCTION The Dublin Mo bility Plan is the second phase of planning for transportation network improvements in the City of Dublin, Ohio. The Plan stems from a successful phase one effort to develop a shared transportation vision that is guiding policy, design, and implementation strategies for multimodal mobility improvements throughout Dublin. During that process, the community convened around what the City identified as a need for enhanced multimodal transportation options in order to support their v ision of being a “Vibrant, Innovative, and Engaged Community.” The transportation vision addresses changing patterns of land use development and mobility, while also responding to specific stakeholder goals, policy updates, and actionable strategies for development standards and infrastructure facilities. The key objectives are outlined below: . Support economic development Keep Dublin competitive as live, work, play preferences evolve
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries, 2010 Delaware, Franklin, Pickaway, and Union Counties
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries, 2010 Delaware, Franklin, Pickaway, and Union Counties Ohio EPA Technical Report EAS/2012-12-12 Division of Surface Water Ecological Assessment Section November 21, 2012 DSW/EAS 2012-12-12 Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries TSD November 21, 2012 Biological and Water Quality Survey of the Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries 2010 Delaware, Franklin, Pickaway, and Union Counties November 21, 2012 Ohio EPA Technical Report/EAS 2012-12-12 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Central District Office Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Ecological Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, OH 43125 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 i DSW/EAS 2012-12-12 Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries TSD November 21, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 12 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 13 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 14 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Scioto Marshes of Ohio : a Study in the Geography of Onion Culture
    THE SCIOTO MARSHES OP OHIO: A STUDY IN THE GEOGRAPHY OF ONION CULTURE.1 CARL DUDLEY VARVEL, Ohio State University. THE AREA AS A UNIT. The Scioto Marsh, a bog soil province in the western part of Hardin County, is the largest of several such areas in the glaciated region of Ohio. The term "Marsh" is no longer used here in the technical sense, but is a "carry over" from the days before the area was drained. It extends over 16,000 acres2 and is believed to be one of the largest continuous onion producing areas in North America. Here the growing onion characterizes the summer landscape. The subject of its culture is foremost in local conversation. Onion cultivation leads successively to a condition of distinct wealth or relative poverty. It motivates an interstate migration of interesting laborers and furnishes the raison d'etre of three settlements within the local region. The greatest agricultural interest of most of the landowners is the onion. On an average about 3,500 acres of onions are harvested. In recent years the acreage has diminished largely as a result of several years of unfavorable climatic conditions which minimized the merchantable yield per acre. In 1915, an exceptional year, over 5,500 acres were harvested. In approaching the region from all directions one sees distinctly the terminal moraines and other glacial deposits. (Fig. 1.) The deposits at the north are part of the watershed between the Ohio River system and the Lake Erie drainage basin. The drumlins and kames at the west and south enclose the marsh and divide the waters of the Scioto Valley from those of the Miami Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Surfside PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA October 25, 2018 – 6:00 P.M
    Town of Surfside PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA October 25, 2018 – 6:00 p.m. Town Hall Commission Chambers – 9293 Harding Ave, 2nd Floor, Surfside, FL 33154 Rule 7.05 Decorum. Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the commission shall be barred from further appearance before the commission by the presiding officer, unless permission to continue or again address the commission is granted by the majority vote of the commission members present. No clapping, applauding, heckling or verbal outbursts in support or opposition to a speaker or his or her remarks shall be permitted. Signs or placards may be disallowed in the commission chamber by the presiding officer. Persons exiting the commission chambers shall do so quietly. Any person who received compensation, remuneration or expenses for conducting lobbying activities is required to register as a lobbyist with the Town Clerk prior to engaging in lobbying activities per Town Code Sec. 2-235. "Lobbyist" specifically includes the principal, as defined in this section, as well as any agent, officer or employee of a principal, regardless of whether such lobbying activities fall within the normal scope of employment of such agent, officer or employee. The term "lobbyist" specifically excludes any person who only appears as a representative of a not-for-profit community-based organization for the purpose of requesting a grant without special compensation or reimbursement for the appearance; and any person who only appears as a representative of a neighborhood, homeowners or condominium association without compensation for the appearance, whether direct or indirect or contingent, to express support of or opposition to any item.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological, Sediment and Water Quality Study of the Little Scioto River, Marion, Ohio
    State of Ohio Ecological Assessment Section Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological, Sediment and Water Quality Study of the Little Scioto River, Marion, Ohio Marion County, Ohio CmHn Benzo(a)pyrene April 8, 1994 P.O. Box 1049, 1800 WaterMark Dr., Columbus, Ohio 43266-0149 Disclaimer: This report was scanned into Adobe PDF format and may contain some typographical errors. Biological, Sediment and Water Quality Study of the Little Scioto River, Marion, Ohio Marion County April 8,8,1994 1994 OEPA Technical Report EAS/1994-4-3 prepared for State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Emergency and Remedial Response prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Ecological Assessment Section 1685 Westbelt Drive Columbus, Ohio 43228 David Altfater Bernie Counts DSW - EAS L. Scioto River TSD/Marion, OH April 8,1994 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements .......................... 4 Introduction ............................... 5 Summary/ Conclusions ......................... 5 Recommendations Use Designation Status ...................... 9 Other ............................. 9 Methods. ............................ 12 Results and Discussions Sediment Chemistry ....................... 16 Pollutant Loadings ....................... 26 Surface Water Chemical Quality .................. 3 1 Physical Habitat for Aquatic Life .................. 33 Macroinvertebrate Community ................... 34 Fish Community ........................ 37 Trend Assessment ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843
    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 12-2016 Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB Brittany Whalen California State University, Monterey Bay Ryan Blackman California State University, Monterey Bay Monica Mata California State University, Monterey Bay Madi Hare California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all Recommended Citation Whalen, Brittany; Blackman, Ryan; Mata, Monica; and Hare, Madi, "Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB" (2016). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 67. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/67 This Capstone Project (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects and Master's Theses at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Brittany Whalen Ryan Blackman Monica Mata Madi Hare Daniel Fernandez, PhD. ENSTU 471 Fall 2016 Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB Introduction Bike-share programs are alternate forms of transportation most commonly found on college campuses or in city centers. These programs allow citizens, visitors, students and others to check-out a bike from a self-serve station and take it from point A to point B. Bike-share programs have grown worldwide at an increasing rate within the past decade. Image 1 shows that in 2001 there were only four worldwide cities that adopted a bike-share program, but that number dramatically increased from the years 2002 to 2014, when there were eight-hundred and fifty-five worldwide cities with bike-share programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Emrick, Isaac J., "Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 5543. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/5543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Tyler Boulware, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. Michele Stephens, Ph.D. Department of History & Amy Hirshman, Ph.D. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Morgantown, West Virginia 2015 Keywords: Native Americans, Indian History, West Virginia History, Colonial North America, Diaspora, Environmental History, Archaeology Copyright 2015 Isaac J. Emrick ABSTRACT Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Everyone needs a (ride) buddy sometimes. Photo by: Deo Martinez FINAL REPORT Ride Buddy Pilot Program for State of Ohio Employees Working in Downtown Columbus MEREDITH J REED, YAY BIKES! BRIDGETTE MCCULLOUGH, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Circle up! Photo by: Ben Ko TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 3 THE CHALLENGE | 6 OUR SOLUTION | 9 PROGRAM OUTCOMES | 14 LESSONS & SUSTAINABILITY | 19 APPENDIX | 22 Page | 2 A ride with Wellness Ambassadors. Photo by: Ben Ko EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State of Ohio employees discover the benefits of bicycle commuting thanks to the Yay Bikes! Ride Buddy program. Page | 3 In 2017, the Ohio Department of Health partnered with local nonprofit Yay Bikes! to encourage bicycle commuting by state agency employees, with the ultimate goal of increasing daily physical activity. 64 employees from 10 state agencies participated in one- hour bike rides led by seasoned commuter cyclists, in which ride leaders modeled how to ride in traffic, explained rules of the road, and introduced local bicycling amenities such Park & Pedal locations and CoGo Bike Share. Post-ride surveys and unsolicited feedback reveal participants gained significant levels of knowledge and confidence from the experience, were inspired to change their behavior, and shared what they learned with others. One rider reported being stunned by the beauty of riding down High Street. Photo by: Deo Martinez “I was pleasantly surprised at how much motorists were cooperating with us. Also, we rode streets that I would have never ridden on because they look too ‘busy’.” “[My favorite part was] Getting out of the office and back on a bike; been too long.” “[I was surprised by] How easy it is to ride during lunch hour.” — Ride participants Page | 4 Key Program Findings Surveys revealed that ride participants: Had a great time: The average rating for the experience was 4.3 on a 5-point scale (between “Great” and “Excellent”).
    [Show full text]
  • Lick Run-Scioto River HUC 050600020403
    Pickaway County Park District 110 Island Rd Ste E, Circleville, OH 43113 Lick Run-Scioto River HUC 050600020403 9-Element Implementation Strategy Published by: Pickaway County Park District Coldwater Consulting, LLC. 46 West Columbus Street Final Draft P.O. Box 146 Galena, OH 43021 August 2020 Lick Run-Scioto River HUC 050600020403 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Page 1 SECTION ONE: Introduction Page 3 Section 1.1: Report Background Page 4 Section 1.2: Watershed Profile and History Page 4 Section 1.3 Public Participation Page 7 SECTION TWO: Watershed Characterization & Assessment Summary Page 9 Section 2.1.1: Physical and Natural Features Page 11 Geological Setting and Soils Page 11 General Habitat Conditions Page 12 Wetlands Page 13 Biology Page 15 Fish Page 15 Endangered Fish Species Page 16 Macroinvertebrates Page 17 Freshwater Mussels Page 18 Amphibians Page 19 Reptiles Page 21 Mammals Page 22 Birds Page 23 Invasive Species Page 26 Section 2.1.2: Land Use and Protection Page 26 Section 2.2: Summary of HUC-12 Biological Trends Page 30 Section 2.3: Summary of HUC-12 NPS Pollution Causes & Sources Page 31 Section 2.4: Additional Information for Determining Critical Areas Page 32 SECTION THREE: Critical Areas and Restoration Strategies Page 34 Section 3.1: Overview of Critical Areas Page 35 Critical Area #1: Lick Run Subwatershed Page 36 Critical Area #2: Canal Park Page 38 Section 3.2: Critical Area #1 Page 39 Detailed Characterization, Conditions, Goals and Objectives Page 39 Detailed Biological Conditions Page 40 Detailed Causes
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Feasibility Study Public Engagement Appendix
    St. Louis Bike Share Study Public Engagement Appendix Appendix 1 – Engagement Summaries (p.2) Appendix 2 – Bike Share Surveys (p.42) Appendix 3 – On-line Suggested Station Locations (p.77) St. Louis Bike Share Study – Public Engagement Appendix Appendix 1 – Engagement Summaries December 2014 / Page 2 St. Louis Bike Share Study – Public Engagement Appendix St. Louis Bike Share Public and Stakeholder Engagement Summary May 2014 Background Great Rivers Greenway is investigating the operational and financial feasibility of implementing a bike share program in St. Louis. The study, led by Alta Planning + Design, includes a feasibility study, business plan and implementation strategy, which will: • Identify target areas and station locations suited to supporting the successful implementation of a bike share program; • Estimate the potential size and scope of a bike share system; • Recommend the optimal business model (system technology, ownership structure, operating conditions and funding options); and • Recommend a blueprint and timeline for a possible launch and operations of bike share in St. Louis. The Engagement Schedule During the week of May 12, Great Rivers Greenway formally introduced the St. Louis Bike Share Study to the public and the project’s Technical Advisory and Citizen and Business Advisory Committees. The public website, ( ) was launched which included information on the project scope and basic information on bike share programs, an online survey and a map for identifying possible bike share stations. On May 14, the first public open house was conducted at the Judith and Dennis Jones Visitor and Education Center in Forest Park from 4:00 to 7:00 pm. The next day, at Webster University’s Downtown Campus, Great Rivers Greenway hosted a Downtown Briefing from 7:30 to 8:30 am, followed by a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting from 10 to 11:30 am.
    [Show full text]