Key Issues in 2Nd and 3Rd Wave US Feminism Professor Naomi Zack Department of Philosophy, University of Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Key issues in 2nd and 3rd Wave US Feminism Professor Naomi Zack Department of Philosophy, University of Oregon The 3 waves First Wave (1789-1920) Mary Wollstonecraft (Vindication of the Rights of Women) and John Stuart Mill (The Subjection of Women) Issues – equality for women as citizens, property owners and marriage partners, as well as educational opportunities so they could be better wives and mothers. Sufferage was achieved in 1920. Second Wave: (1955- circa 1975) Simone de Beauvoir (The Second Sex) and Betty Friedan (The Feminine Miystique) Equal access was achieved in the second wave but the following problems remain for the Third Wave 1.Feminism has been dominated by white privileged women. 2.Women of color and poor women have different problems than white priviledged women, which may result in different genders, on the model “Sex + Race = Gender.” 3. Some writers claim that there is no such thing as women and that the group is too diverse to be defined. 4. Despite equal access in employment, women encounter “glass ceilings” and have chosen to work second shifts. I have developed three solutions to these problems in my recent book, Inclusive Feminism: A Third Wave Theory of Women’s Commonality. First, We can define women as those human beings who are assigned to or identify with the group of birth females, biological mothers and heterosexual choices of men. This is an essentialist but non-substantial definition. It refers to a relation shared by all women, namely their relation to this group, call it category FMP. Not all who are women need be any one of the three sub-categories mentioned and male-to-female transsexuals would be women on this definition. Second, The problem of the second shift is a problem in how we value goods that are not priced, such as motherhood, family care and child rearing. It wouldn’t solve the problem to pay women for serving in a second shift, because that would only commodify women’s work, which should probably remain unpriced but be more highly respected. Third, Human recorded history has been men’s history with male rulers. One thing that might bring about the transvaluation of values called for above would be women heads of state, where women are traditionally defined as those who are assigned to or identify with category FMP. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

“One Is Not Born a Woman; One Becomes One”
School of Humanities and Media Studies English Department Master Degree Thesis in Literature, 15 hp Course code: EN3039 Supervisor: Mats Tegmark “One Is Not Born a Woman; One Becomes One” Perpetuating Gender Roles in the Dystopian Novels Brave New World and The Giver Steffanie Rowland Dalarna University English Department Degree Thesis Spring 2010 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Feminism ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Utopias and Dystopias .................................................................................................................. 6 Previous Research on Brave New World ..................................................................................... 8 Previous Research on The Giver ................................................................................................ 11 Characterisation .......................................................................................................................... 14 Relationships ............................................................................................................................... 17 Reproduction ............................................................................................................................... 22 Work............................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Feminist Philosophy Comprehensive: Reading List
Feminist Philosophy Comprehensive: Reading List The main part of this list comprises readings that correspond to each of the five sections of the comprehensive exam. The Reference Books at the end of the list provide more background, but they are entirely optional. 1. Core Concepts a. Feminism Mill, J. S. “The Subjection of Women.” In Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. A. Cudd and R. Andreasen, eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2005: 17-26. de Beauvoir, S. “Introduction from The Second Sex.” In Cudd and Andreasen: 27-36. Truth, S. “Ar’n’t I a Woman?” In Theorizing Feminisms: A Reader. Ed. E. Hackett and S. Haslanger. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006. 113. Tuana, N. ‘What is Feminist Philosophy?’ Philosophy in Multiple Voices. Ed. G. Yancy. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007. Sherwin, S. “Understanding Feminism.” In her No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics & Health Care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple, 1992. 13-34. b. Sex and Gender Butler, J. “Introduction: Acting in Concert.” In Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge, 2004. pp. 1-16. Fausto-Sterling, A. “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough,” The Sciences 33(2), 1993: 20-24. Garry, A. “Intersectionality, Metaphors, and the Multiplicity of Gender,” Hypatia, 26(4), 2011: 826–850. Haslanger, S. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” Noûs 34(1), 2000: 31-55. Heyes, C. J. “Changing Race, Changing Sex: The Ethics of Self-Transformation,” Journal of Social Philosophy 37(2), 2006: 266-282. Jenkins, K. “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” Ethics 126 (2016): 394–421.
[Show full text]
Womensst 692B
Womenst 692 B History of Feminist Theory Weds. 2:30-5 pm Spring 2012 Professor emerita Ann Ferguson, Philosophy and Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Office hours: Weds. 1-2:15 pm And by appointment [email protected] or (home) 413-367-2310 Texts (available at Food for Thought Bookstore, 106 N. Pleasant St., Amherst, also on 3 day loan Library reserve at the WEB Du Bois University Library) Required: 1. Sally Scholz Feminism: An Introduction (2010, One World/Oxford) 2. Michel Foucault History of Sexuality, v. 1 (1980, Vintage) 3. Linda Nicholson, ed. The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory (1997, Routledge) Optional: Rachel Alsop et al, eds. Theorizing Gender (2002, Polity) Silvia Federici Caliban and the Witch (2004, Autonomedia) Rosemary Tong Feminist Thought (1998 or 2007, Westview) Other readings for the course available on UMass UDrive (www. udrive.oit.umass.edu/xythoswfs/webview/xythoslogin.action, password given in seminar) Class Requirements and Grading Policies There are 3 components through which the course will be graded: class participation, which includes a class report, short paper, and final term paper. The work done by each student for each of these components will be weighted as follows: class participation (including class report) 30%, short paper 30%, and final term paper 40%. A. Class Participation (30%): Students will be expected to do the assigned reading before each class and to contribute to the discussion about them. Responding to discussion questions on the reading: These will be given as homework from time to time which should be responded to on the course email list the night before the seminar.
[Show full text]
Mill, Gender Ideal and Gender Oppression: Do Feminists Need to Abolish Gender Roles?
UCLA Thinking Gender Papers Title Mill, Gender Ideal and Gender Oppression: Do Feminists Need to Abolish Gender Roles? Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/46d897kv Author Popa, Bogdan Publication Date 2011-05-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Mill, Gender Ideal and Gender Oppression: Do Feminists Need to Abolish Gender Roles? Key words: gender, Mill, feminism, ideal, oppressive, liberalism, androgynism, family, equality, negativity Various feminist scholars (Annas, 1977; Okin, 1979; Eisenstein, 1981; Ring, 1985) notice that Mill’s The Subjection of Women is plagued with ambiguities. On the one hand, Mill forcefully denies that “any one knows or can know, the nature of the two sexes” (CW: XXI, 273). Mill argues his case on female equality by claiming that certainly most, and probably all, differences between men and women are attributed to environmental factors. In this regard, Mill believes that existing experience is unreliable in an argument about women’s nature (CW: XXI, 261). On the other hand, many of Mill’s arguments rest on the premise that the actual experience of gender is a guide for understanding gender politics. Women could vote and be elected in Parliament because exceptional women were strong leaders in history. Mothers have a “natural” role in raising children, and women may choose traditional gender roles instead of economic independence. Women use cunning and specific gendered strategies to fulfill their needs. Actual families are “schools for despotism” where fathers impose their will on wives and children. While feminist scholarship generally looks at Mill’s ambiguities as confusions or flaws, I suggest that Mill’s ambivalence has to be taken at face value by feminist theory.
[Show full text]
"On the Enslavement of Women's Minds: John Stuart Mill's The
Smits, Katherine. "On the Enslavement of Women’s Minds: John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women." Feminist Moments: Reading Feminist Texts. Ed. Katherine Smits and Susan Bruce. : Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 83–90. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 3 Oct. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474237970.ch-011>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 3 October 2021, 04:54 UTC. Copyright © Susan Bruce, Katherine Smits and the Contributors 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 10 On the Enslavement of Women’s Minds: John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women Katherine Smits All causes, social and natural, combine to make it unlikely that women should be collectively rebellious to the power of men. They are so far in a position different from all other subject classes, that their masters require something more from them than actual service. Men do not want solely the obedience of women, they want their sentiments. All men, except the most brutish, desire to have, in the woman most nearly connected with them, not a forced slave but a willing one, not a slave merely, but a favourite. They have therefore put everything in practice to enslave their minds. The masters of all other slaves rely, for maintaining obedience, on fear; either fear of themselves or religious fears. The masters of women wanted more than simple obedience, and they turned the whole force of education to effect their purpose. All women are brought up from the very earliest years in the belief that their ideal of character is the very opposite to that of men; not self-will, and government by self- control, but submission, and yielding to the control of others.
[Show full text]
Mill's Liberal Feminism: Its Legacy and Current Criticism
Prolegomena 5 (2) 2006: 179–191 Mill’s Liberal Feminism: Its Legacy and Current Criticism MARIANA SZAPUOVÁ Comenius University in Bratislava – Faculty of Arts Department of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy Gondova 2, 818 01 Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected] ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE / RECEIVED: 13–07–06 ACCEPTED: 20–10–06 ABSTRACT:.This.paper.highlights.John.Stuart.Mill’s.views.on.the.problem.of.gender. equality.as.expressed.in.The Subjection of Women,.which.is.commonly.regarded. as.one.of.the.core.texts.of.Enlightenment.liberal.feminism.of.the.19th.century ..In. this.paper,.the.author.outlines.the.historical.context.of.both.Mill’s.views.and.his. personal.biography,.which.influenced.his.argumentation.for.the.emancipation.of. women,.and.considers.Mill’s.utilitarianism.and.liberalism,.as.the.main.philosoph- ical.background.for.his.criticism.of.social.conditions.that.subordinated.women .. She.reflects.on.some.of.the.philosopher’s.ideas.and.arguments.for.equality.and. friendship.between.women.and.men.which.may.still.be.considered.noteworthy. and.relevant ..Attention.is.also.given.to.the.main.lines.of.contemporary.reception. of.Mill’s.liberal.feminism.from.the.perspective.of.current.feminist.philosophy,. within.which.certain.critical.views.predominate ..Despite.some.problematic.points. in.Mill’s.considerations,.his.essay.on.women’s.subjection.may.be.regarded.as.one. of.the.philosophically.most.interesting.conceptions.of.liberal.feminist.thinking . KEYWORDS:.Equality,.feminism,.gender,.liberalism,.philosophy . John Stuart Mill as Feminist: Biographical Context Although.contemporary.feminist.reflection.on.the.tradition.of.European. philosophical. thinking. is. quite. heterogeneous. and. richly. differentiated,. among. the. common.
[Show full text]
Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women's Human Rights
WOLLSTONECRAFT, MILL, AND WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS Y6872.indb i 1/6/16 10:37:56 AM This page intentionally left blank EILEEN HUNT BOTTING Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights NEW HAVEN AND LONDON Y6872.indb iii 1/6/16 10:37:56 AM Published with assistance from the foundation established in memory of Philip Hamilton McMillan of the Class of 1894, Yale College. Copyright © 2016 by Eileen Hunt Botting. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail sales.press@yale .edu (U.S. ofﬁ ce) or [email protected] (U.K. ofﬁ ce). Set in Janson Oldstyle type by Newgen North America. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2015947730 isbn: 978-0-300-18615-4 (cloth : alk. paper) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ansi /niso z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Y6872.indb iv 1/6/16 10:37:56 AM CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction: Women’s Human Rights as Integral to Universal Human Rights 1 one A Philosophical Genealogy of Women’s Human Rights 26 two Foundations of Universal Human Rights: Wollstonecraft’s Rational Theology and Mill’s Liberal Utilitarianism
[Show full text]
John Stuart Mill and the Subjection of Women
JOHN STUART MILL AND THE SUBJECTION OF WOMEN by ARTHUR LAURENCE LAZENBY B. Comm., University of British Columbia, 1954 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August, 1968 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and Study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by hits representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date ^ffc 3y l<JCC ABSTRACT The Subjection of Women was the last book by John Stuart Hill published during his lifetime. It presented a philosophical analysis of the position of women in society, as unrecognised individuals both in public and domestic roles. Mill exposed the moral and ethical shortcomings' of a system which denied women legal status or moral equality, and he made a number of specific suggestions for reform, particularly respecting legal and educational rights for women. During the following sixty years in Britain, almost all of his suggested reforms were achieved. Because. Mill' s specific pleas were answered, the Subjection of Women has come to be regarded as an out-cf-date argument for conditions which have been corrected.
[Show full text]
Mill and the Subjection of Women JULIA ANNAS
Mill and the Subjection of Women JULIA ANNAS When Mill's The Subjection of Women was published in 1869 it was ahead of its time in boldly championing feminism.1 It failed to inaugurate a respectable intellectual debate. Feminist writers have tended to refer to it with respect but without any serious attempt to come to grips with Mill's actual arguments. Kate Millett's chapter in Sexual Politics is the only sustained discussion of Mill in the feminist literature that I am aware of, but it is not from a philosophical viewpoint, and deals with Mill only in the service of an extended comparison with Ruskin. Philosophical books on Mill give the essay short measure. Alan Ryan in J. S. Mill heads one chapter 'Liberty and The Subjection of Women', but the former work gets twenty-six pages and the latter only four. Ryan says that 'it is almost entirely concerned with the legal disabilities of women in Victorian England'. H. J. McCloskey, in John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study, gives the essay one and a half pages, commenting that it reads 'like a series of truisms' and seems so unimportant today because equality of the sexes has been achieved! It is, however, simply false to say that Mill's essay is mostly concerned with legal technicalities which have since been changed, and so of no great interest today. The Subjection of Women is concerned with women's legal disabilities only in so far as they reflect profound social and economic inequalities between the sexes. While today there are few ways in which women are under legal disabilities compared with men (though it would be a mistake to think there are none) women are still subject to economic and social discrimination in a variety of ways, and it is extraordinary to think that Mill's essay no longer contains anything interesting or controversial just because there have been a few changes in the law.
[Show full text]
Mill and the Status of Women by Sehreen Far Bokhari
27 Al-Hikmat Volume 37 (2017) pp. 27-43 MILL AND THE STATUS OF WOMEN Sehreen Far Bokhari Assistant Professor & PhD Scholar Department of Philosophy University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Abstract: The twofold aims of this article can be described in a positive and negative way. On a positive level, the author endeavors to state John Stuart Mill’s position regarding the status of women as a liberal feminist, who advocated equality among male and female members within human societies. He rejected the idea that male members are biologically and legally superior to females, therefore; females must be treated as their domestic and legal subordinates. Mill also negates that majority is always right in presenting norms and regulations. Mill summarizes that without implementation of the perfect equality principle, society cannot progress. On the other hand, the article highlights negative aspects such as inconsistencies and circular reasoning in his thought along with the evaluation of different criticisms by some thinkers on his views. The article gives a glimpse of the historical background for the development of Mill’s liberal feminist thoughts, his political philosophy and utilitarian approach toward the welfare of humankind. Ultimately, I conclude that the consistencies and inconsistencies found in Mill’s thought are evolved and germinated in his philosophy due to his socio-political environment. Key Words: Utilitarianism, Liberty, Equality, Women Rights 28 Sehreen Far Bokhari Identity among species is determined by their bodily features, characteristics, and functions which are assigned by nature itself. The biological distinction of gender is a prerequisite for the process of reproduction among species.
[Show full text]
POLS 235: Equality and Justice
Smita A. Rahman [email protected] 104 Asbury Hall Office Phone: 765-658-4830 Department of Political Science Office Hours: TR 4-5PM [email protected] and by appointment POLS 235: Equality and Justice Course Description: This course will investigate multiple dimensions of equality and justice through a broad exploration of classical, modern, and contemporary political theory. Some of the questions raised by this course will include, does an abstract principle of equality necessarily lead to just outcomes? How do political societies negotiate between multiple and competing claims of justice? What role does power and privilege play in these debates? We will begin by reading some of the key thinkers in the western tradition, such as Sophocles, Aristotle, Locke, and Rousseau to analyze their views on equality and justice at the start of the class to develop a theoretical frame for responding to these questions. After we have sharpened our theoretical prism, we will then explore these questions in three key areas: feminism, gender, and sexuality; race, power, and privilege, and finally conclude by turning to an exploration of the possibility of restorative justice. Doing so will allow us to not only broaden the conversation by including a multiplicity of voices, but it will also allow us to theorize what a politics of difference might actually entail. In each of these areas, we will cover a range of thinkers throughout history. In the women, gender, and sexuality section, we will read a wide array of thinkers such as Cady Stanton, Sojourner Truth, bell hooks, and Judith Butler, among others, to examine the struggle for women’s rights from the suffragist movement, to black feminism, to the queering of politics.
[Show full text]
Liberal Feminist Jurisprudence: Foundational, Enduring, Adaptive
Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2022 Liberal Feminist Jurisprudence: Foundational, Enduring, Adaptive Linda C. McClain Brittany K. Hacker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons LIBERAL FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE: FOUNDATIONAL, ENDURING, ADAPTIVE (“LIBERAL FEMINISM”) Boston University School of Law 21-16 2022 Linda C. McClain Boston University School of Law Brittany K. Hacker Boston University School of Law Forthcoming: OXFORD HANDBOOK OF FEMINISM AND THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES (Martha Chamallas, Deborah L. Brake, and Verna L. Williams, editors, Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2022) Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3854104 Liberal Feminist Jurisprudence: Foundational, Enduring, Adaptive (to be published as chapter on “Liberal Feminism” in OXFORD HANDBOOK OF FEMINISM AND THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES (Martha Chamallas, Deborah L. Brake, and Verna L. Williams, editors, Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2022) Linda C. McClain* & Brittany K. Hacker** Introduction Liberal feminism is a significant strand of feminist jurisprudence (or feminist legal theory) in the United States and elsewhere. The relationship between liberalism and feminism, however, is complex. As an historical matter, there is little doubt that liberal political philosophy serves as an important foundation for feminist political and legal thought. Feminists have
[Show full text]