DOCSLIB.ORG

Open PDF 147KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO THE PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE OF AID Summary and recommendation 1. We recommend that as part of your ‘philosophy and culture of aid’ inquiry that you consider prioritizing the topic of cuts to ODA-funded research. All organisations and actors within the international development sector in the UK and internationally – INGOs, academics, research programmes, diaspora – are extremely concerned about the harm caused by these cuts. 2. An inquiry would be an opportunity to assess the likely impact on both UK organisations but also our partners in the Global South, and to argue that the decision should be reconsidered. We anticipate that witnesses would raise philosophical questions about (a) the precautionary principle; for example, should international agencies commit to the prevention of severe harm in their aid and development policies? (b) the importance of UK’s aid programme to our reputation, (c) the UK’s partnerships across the world and what responsibilities these entail, (d) the importance and hierarchies of knowledge in international development, (e) what kind of policy-making creates risk in our investments (also of interest to the Public Accounts Committee). 3. We recommend that you call this inquiry – ‘Cuts to partnership, knowledge and the prevention of harm’ and ask UK universities and INGOs to encourage submissions from across the Global South. We are aware that the IDSC has been diversifying witnesses, including encouraging practitioners and researchers in countries overseas to submit evidence, as a result of your 2019 global conference co-hosted with UKRI and GCRF. We would encourage every development studies department in the UK to encourage colleagues in the Global South to submit evidence. 4. We are 1226 academics and practitioners, co-ordinated by Professor Sam Hickey, President of the Development Studies Association, with many of the signatories as members, working in partnership with research organisations across the UK, Africa, Asia, Middle East and Latin America. Justification for this inquiry 5. We suggest this topic in response to the letter issued by the UKRI on 11th March 2021 informing UK higher education institutions that it would be reducing the allocation to UKRI ‘significantly’ in light of the UK government’s decision to abandon its Official Development Assistance (ODA) commitment to 0.7% of GNP. 6. This directly contradicts government’s stated commitment to ‘science, research and technology’ as one of the key global challenges that the UK is well-placed to address. In the year that UK hosts the upcoming G7 Summit and COP26, the cuts will leave the UK out of step with global efforts to tackle grand challenges through research led initiatives. International cooperation is vital to the UK Government’s vision for the UK as a global force in research and development, acting as a powerhouse of ideas and solutions. 7. The proposed cuts will leave a £120 million hole in ODA-funded research for 2021-22. This will cause huge damage to the UK’s research base, its international partnerships and its ability to contribute to the global effort to tackle the Sustainable Development Goals. The cuts are out of all proportion to the general reduction of the ODA budget and suggest an ideological shift away from a commitment to science and evidence as the basis for UK aid and for tackling global challenges more generally. 8. The cuts undermine efforts to build international consensus and cooperation around evidence based solutions. Development problems cannot be tackled in isolation: our sustainable global future relies on international solutions to the complex challenges enshrined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Allocating Official Development Assistance (ODA) funds to UK Research and Innovation has allowed the UK to play a major role in tackling these global challenges, including through the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) and Newton Fund. 9. Operating through interdisciplinary partnerships with research collaborators throughout the Global South, UK development research has been a major success story, ensuring evidence-based responses to problems such as Covid-19, global health, conflict, migration and displacement, poverty and inequalities, urban transformations, gender equity, inclusive growth and youth employment, and climate and environmental justice. 10. To date, this funding has generated opportunities for researchers from the UK to work together with those in Lower and Middle Income Countries to generate lasting solutions with global reach. ODA research represents Britain at its best and allows UK researchers to work in partnership internationally across disciplines and in an equitable manner to address complex societal problems. 11. Research of this nature cannot be achieved without international partnerships that reach beyond the walls of academia into communities, industries and governmental and non-governmental organisations. These research projects have played a major role in building the capacities of research institutions from low- and middle-income countries whose role will be critical in international efforts to tackle these global challenges. 12. Collectively these funds are now working in > 100 countries involving > 2,500 researchers developing stronger relationships with the very groups with whom the UK wishes to strengthen and deepen links. This was a forward thinking, truly international outlook. The Covid-19 pandemic has evidenced the value of this integrated approach, both to the UK and to our international partners. 13. The consequences of this decision will be far-reaching and irreversible, directly undercutting one of the UK’s development research success stories of recent decades. Its impacts will be felt by some of the poorest, most vulnerable and marginalised members of our global community, as well as a future generation of researchers from ODA recipient countries being trained and equipped, along with UK research institutions and partners, to tackle the major challenges faced by our world. 14. There is no systematic, logical or fair way that cuts of this magnitude and pace can be implemented, and arbitrary decisions are inevitable. UK research institutions will not be able to fulfil agreements with overseas partners who are relying on receiving the full value of agreed allocations, many of which have already been written into contracts. 15. As well as directly threatening the futures of the vulnerable and marginalised that this funding targets, the resultant abrupt termination of research projects will obliterate the hard-won trust with international development partners and governments overseas. We are already seeing this beginning to happen as a result of the very limited information that has been made public about the intention to make the cuts. 16. Relationships of trust built up over many years between UK researchers and institutions in the Global South will be damaged and the capacity of UK universities to recruit global talent severely diminished. The decision sends a message that the UK government only values equitable partnerships in the good times. The reputational damage to the UK Government and to UK researchers and research institutions will be considerable. Moreover, these cuts undermine the broader agreement between government and the university sector, which has pivoted towards the global challenges agenda and dedicated significant resources to support development research. 17. A generation of new global researchers and practitioners are now facing the prospect of the abrupt termination of contracts, and cessation of research, before they are able to produce the outputs essential to the development of their careers, jeopardising jobs both in the UK and abroad at a time of national and international crisis. 18. Importantly for the UK taxpayer, these cuts constitute extremely poor value for money. It will mean wasting resources that have been invested in a large cohort of internationally ground-breaking research projects whose key outputs, policy impacts and legacies will be seriously undermined by these cuts. 19. We deplore the short-term view of this research funding, that has created an unprecedented decision to shut down and ‘reprofile’ approved and competitively- funded projects. This is an action from which it will take years to recover in terms of broken relationships of trust and collaboration, research infrastructure, and impact engagement. 20. We call for an immediate reversal of this decision, maintaining this opportunity for the UK to sustain its profile in leading research to tackle global challenges. Professor Samuel Hickey, Chair of the Development Studies Association, University of Manchester Professor David Hulme OBE, University of Manchester Professor Emma Crewe, SOAS, University of London Professor Jonathan Goodhand, SOAS, University of London Professor John Morton, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich Dr Irene Guijt, Oxfam Great Britain Professor Alfredo Saad Filho, King's College London Professor Andrea Cornwall, SOAS Professor Michael Walls, UCL Professor Diego Sanchez-Ancochea, University of Oxford Dr Grace Carswell, University of Sussex Professor Peter Newell, University of Sussex Dr Julie Litchfield, University of Sussex Professor Michael Collyer, University of Sussex Professor Adrian Martin, University of East Anglia Professor Nitya Rao, University of East Anglia Professor Laura Camfield, School of International Development
Recommended publications
  • Emotions in the Field: the Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork

    Emotions in the Field: the Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork

    Emotions in the Field Emotions in the Field The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience Edited by James Davies and Dimitrina Spencer Stanford University Press Stanford, California Stanford University Press Stanford, California ©2010 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Stanford University Press. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Emotions in the field : the psychology and anthropology of fieldwork experience / edited by James Davies and Dimitrina Spencer. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8047-6939-6 (cloth : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-0-8047-6940-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Ethnology--Fieldwork--Psychological aspects. 2. Emotions--Anthropological aspects. I. Davies, James (James Peter) II. Spencer, Dimitrina. GN346.E46 2010 305.8'00723--dc22 2009046034 Typeset by Bruce Lundquist in 10/14 Minion Contents Acknowledgments vii Contributors ix Introduction: Emotions in the Field 1 James Davies Part I Psychology of Field Experience 1 From Anxiety to Method in Anthropological Fieldwork: An Appraisal of George Devereux’s Enduring Ideas 35 Michael Jackson 2 “At the Heart of the Discipline”: Critical Reflections on Fieldwork 55 Vincent
  • British Academy New Fellows 2015 Fellows Professor Janette Atkinson

    British Academy New Fellows 2015 Fellows Professor Janette Atkinson

    British Academy New Fellows 2015 Fellows Professor Janette Atkinson FMedSci Emeritus Professor, University College London; Visiting Professor, University of Oxford Professor Oriana Bandiera Professor of Economics, Director of STICERD, London School of Economics Professor Melanie Bartley Emeritus Professor of Medical Sociology, University College London Professor Christine Bell Professor of Constitutional Law, Assistant Principal and Executive Director, Global Justice Academy, University of Edinburgh Professor Julia Black Professor of Law and Pro Director for Research, London School of Economics and Political Science Professor Cyprian Broodbank John Disney Professor of Archaeology and Director, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge Professor David Buckingham Emeritus Professor of Media and Communications, Loughborough University; Visiting Professor, Sussex University; Visiting Professor, Norwegian Centre for Child Research Professor Craig Calhoun Director and School Professor, London School of Economics Professor Michael Carrithers Professor of Anthropology, Durham University Professor Dawn Chatty Professor of Anthropology and Forced Migration, University of Oxford Professor Andy Clark FRSE Professor of Logic and Metaphysics, University of Edinburgh Professor Thomas Corns Emeritus Professor of English Literature, Bangor University Professor Elizabeth Edwards Professor of Photographic History, Director of Photographic History Research Centre, De Montfort University Professor Briony Fer Professor of Art History,
  • 1 Introduction: Memory, Trauma and World Politics

    1 Introduction: Memory, Trauma and World Politics

    Notes 1 Introduction: Memory, Trauma and World Politics 1. Walter Benjamin, ‘A Berlin Chronicle’ in Benjamin, One Way Street, and Other Writings, trans. Edmund Jephcott & Kingsley Shorter (London: NLB, 1970), p. 314. 2. Lewis Carroll, ‘Through the Looking Glass’ in The Complete Illustrated Works of Lewis Carroll [1872] (London: Chancellor Press, 1982), p. 171. 3. Andreas Huyssen, ‘Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia’, Public Culture, 12 (2000), 26. 4. Winter, ‘Notes on the memory boom’, p. 54. See also Jeffrey K. Olick and Joyce Robbins, ‘Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (1998), 105–41; Jan-Werner Müller, ‘Introduction: The Power of Memory, the Memory of Power and the Power over Memory’ in Müller (ed.), Memory and Power in Post-war Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 1–39; Andreas Huyssen, Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003); and Allan Megill, ‘History, Memory, Identity’, History of the Human Sciences, 11 (1998), 37–62. 5. Müller, ‘Introduction’, pp. 28–31; and Victor Roudometof, ‘Beyond Commemoration: The Politics of Collective Memory’, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 32 (2004), 3–4. 6. Avishai Margalit, The Ethics of Memory (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2003), p. 14. Italics in original. 7. Yuen Foong Khong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992); Richard Neustadt and Ernest May, Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (New York: Free Press, 1986); Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).
  • Cambridge E-Books Title Author Collection Name Volume Edition

    Cambridge E-Books Title Author Collection Name Volume Edition

    Cambridge E-Books Title Author Collection name Volume Edition The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand, Paul Herrup 1 Edited by Evencio Mediavilla, Santiago Arribas, Martin Roth, Jordi 3D Spectroscopy in Astronomy Cepa-Nogué, Francisco Sánchez 1 A. W. H. Phillips: Collected Works in Contemporary Perspective Edited by Robert Leeson 1 Edited by Vincenzo Antonuccio- AGN Feedback in Galaxy Formation Delogu, Joseph Silk 1 The Abolition of the African Slave-Trade by the British Parliament Thomas Clarkson 2 1 The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law William A. Schabas 3 Herbert Cole Coombs, Foreword by Aboriginal Autonomy Mick Dodson 1 Absolutism and Society in Seventeenth-Century France William Beik 1 An Account of Some Recent Discoveries in Hieroglyphical Literature and Egyptian Antiquities Thomas Young 1 Account of the Harvard Greek Play Henry Norman 1 An Account of the Present State of the Island of Puerto Rico George D. Flinter 1 Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law Liesbeth Zegveld 1 Accounting Principles for Lawyers Peter Holgate 1 Achieving Industrialization in East Asia Edited by Helen Hughes 1 Acquiring Phonology Neil Smith 1 Across Australia Baldwin Spencer, F. J. Gillen 2 1 Archibald John Little, Edited by Across Yunnan Alicia Little 1 Across the Jordan Gottlieb Schumacher 1 Across the Plains Robert Louis Stevenson 1 Acta Mythologica Apostolorum in Arabic Edited by Agnes Smith Lewis 1 Acts of Activism D. Soyini Madison 1 Fenton John Anthony Hort, Edited by Brooke Foss Westcott, Thomas The Acts of the Apostles Ethelbert Page 1 Acute Medicine J.
  • SOAS Postgraduate Prospectus 2014 15.Pdf

    SOAS Postgraduate Prospectus 2014 15.Pdf

    SOAS, University of London University SOAS, SOAS, University of London Thornhaugh Street Russell Square The world’s London WC1H 0XG Student Recruitment Oce leading institution Tel: +44 (0)20 7898 4034 Fax: +44 (0)20 7898 4039 Email: [email protected] for the study of Asia, Switchboard Tel: +44 (0)20 7637 2388 Africa and the Middle East Facebook www.facebook.com/ soasunioflondon Twitter @soas YouTube www.youtube.com/ soasuniversity Weibo SOASLondon Postgraduate Prospectus Postgraduate Postgraduate 2014/15 Prospectus www.soas.ac.uk 2014/15 LifeSOAS, and University Study at ofSOAS London Welcome SOAS, University of London is the world’s leading institution for the study of Asia, Africa and the Middle East. While other universities have mission statements, SOAS has a real mission – to analyse, understand and explain a globalised world in which, nevertheless, difference and regionalism present themselves acutely. Students and scholars from across the globe continually choose SOAS because of its international reputation and unrivalled concentration of expertise in these regions. SOAS is a guardian of specialised knowledge in languages and periods and regions not available anywhere else in the UK but, equally, SOAS scholars grapple with pressing issues – democracy, development, human rights, identity, legal systems, poverty, religion, social change – confronting two-thirds of humankind. SOAS is renowned for its diverse and vibrant community. Almost half the student body is international, which according to the 2012 QS World University Rankings, places SOAS as having the ninth highest percentage of international students in the world. More importantly for SOAS, the exchange of ideas takes place on a world stage, crucial to deepen research, sharpen scholarly debate and, ultimately, nurture, challenge and inspire.
  • The Anthropology of Parliaments

    The Anthropology of Parliaments

    THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF PARLIAMENTS The Anthropology of Parliaments offers a fresh, comparative approach to analysing parliaments and democratic politics, drawing together rare ethnographic work by anthropologists and politics scholars from around the world. Crewe’s insights deepen our understanding of the complexity of political institu- tions. She reveals how elected politicians navigate relationships by forging alliances and thwarting opponents; how parliamentary buildings are constructed as sites of work, debate and the nation in miniature; and how politicians and officials engage with hierarchies, continuity and change. This book also proposes how to study parliaments through an anthropological lens while in conversation with other disciplines. The dive into ethnographies from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the Pacific Region demolishes hackneyed geo-political categories and culminates in a new comparative theory about the contradictions in everyday political work. This important book will be of interest to anyone studying parliaments but especially those in the disciplines of anthropology and sociology; politics, legal and development studies; and international relations. Emma Crewe is Professor of Social Anthropology at SOAS, University of London, UK. ‘With characteristic wit and imagination, Emma Crewe casts her anthropological eye across the spectrum of parliamentary politics. This book is the product of those enquiries – it is sparklingly fresh, insightful, and as ever with this author, more inter- ested
  • Studies in Jaina History and Culture

    Studies in Jaina History and Culture

    Flugel-FM.qxd 13/3/06 9:08 PM Page i STUDIES IN JAINA HISTORY AND CULTURE The past ten years have seen the interest in Jainism increasing, with this previously little-known Indian religion assuming a significant place in Study of Religious. This timely collection presents original research from a cross-section of eminent scholars on varied aspects of Jaina Studies. The volume crosses disciplinary boundaries with a range of empirical and textual studies on Jainism and the Jains. Topics that are covered include the role of women in Jain society, Jaina law and property, and sectarian Jain traditions. Studies in Jaina History and Culture is a stimulating and representative snapshot of the current state of Jaina Studies that will interest students and academics involved in the study of religion or South Asian cultures. Peter Flügel is Chair of the Centre of Jaina Studies at the Department of the Study of Religions in the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. He has published extensively on the history and anthropology of contemporary Jain schools and sects, Jain stupas, Jaina–Vaisjava syncretism, and the social history of the Jain tradition. He is the editor of the International Journal of Jain Studies http://www.soas.ac.uk/ijjs Flugel-FM.qxd 13/3/06 9:08 PM Page ii ROUTLEDGE ADVANCES IN JAINA STUDIES Edited by Peter Flügel Jaina Studies have become an important part of the study of religion. This series provides a medium for regular scholarly exchange across disciplinary boundaries. It publishes edited collections and monographs on Jainism and the Jains.
  • Statement on the Research Excellence Framework Proposals

    Statement on the Research Excellence Framework Proposals

    Statement on the Research Excellence Framework proposals The latest proposal by the higher education funding councils is If implemented, these proposals risk undermining support for for 25% of the new Research Excellence Framework (REF) to basic research across all disciplines and may well lead to an be assessed according to 'economic and social impact'. As academic brain drain to countries such as the United States academics, researchers and higher education professionals we that continue to value fundamental research. believe that it is counterproductive to make funding for the best research conditional on its perceived economic and social Universities must continue to be spaces in which the spirit of benefits. adventure thrives and where researchers enjoy academic freedom to push back the boundaries of knowledge in their The REF proposals are founded on a lack of understanding of disciplines. how knowledge advances. It is often difficult to predict which research will create the greatest practical impact. History We, therefore, call on the UK funding councils to shows us that in many instances it is curiosity-driven research withdraw the current REF proposals and to work with that has led to major scientific and cultural advances. academics and researchers on creating a funding regime which supports and fosters basic research in our universities and colleges rather than discourages it. Signed: Name Institution Relevant titles/positions Sir Tim Hunt Cancer Research UK FRS, Nobel Laureate 2001 Professor John Dainton University of Liverpool Fellow of the Royal Society Fellow of the Institute of Physics Fellow of the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA) Name Institution Relevant titles/positions Professor Venki Ramakrishnan University of Cambridge FRS, Nobel Prize in Chemistry Professor Brian Josephson University of Cambridge Nobel Laureate in Physics Professor Harry Kroto The Florida State University FRS Professor Donald W Braben UCL Sir John Walker Medical Research Council and University of FRS, F.
  • British Academy 'Review of the Year' 2015/16

    British Academy 'Review of the Year' 2015/16

    INSPIRING EXCELLENCE REVIEW OF THE YEAR 2015/16 British Academy Review of the Year 2015/16 1 CONTENTS PRESIDENT’S WELCOME Welcome to this summary of a busy Since the General Election, we have argued year of increasing activity at the strongly to the Government and others that British Academy. It illustrates the if, as a country, we wish to see growth and innovation, it is vital that we invest strongly in growing impact of our public and policy social science and humanities research. Their engagement – drawing on the unique importance rests not in the benefits they 01 PRESIDENT’S WELCOME 06 CHAMPIONING THE HUMANITIES powerhouse of expertise within our bring to our economy alone, crucial though AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Fellowship, using our convening power these are, but in their impact on the wider 02 CHIEF EXECUTive’S to feed that knowledge and wisdom social, cultural and individual well-being of INTRODUCTION into the public arena, and raising public all who live and work in the UK. They are 10 ADVANCING EXCELLENT also the essential ‘twin’ to the understanding 04 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW RESEARCH awareness of our work. of our natural world that science brings – interdependent realms of knowledge, each The British Academy Debates have proved incomplete without the other. 14 SHAPING POLICY AND PUBLIC to be a valuable way of demonstrating UNDERSTANDING the contribution that social science and But however strong the evidence – and it This Review of the Year presents a humanities research and expertise make is very strong indeed – this is not an easy summary of highlights from the past year, 18 DELIVERING GLOBAL to exploring present day challenges.
  • Techniques of the Self - Fall 1995

    Techniques of the Self - Fall 1995

    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Cinema Studies H72.3006 - TECHNIQUES OF THE SELF - FALL 1995 COURSE OUTLINE AND STUDY GUIDE WELCOME Welcome to Techniques of the Self. The course co-ordinator is Professor Toby Miller. If you have any specific issues to raise about H72.3006, please make a time to see me. Consultation hours are between 5.00 and 6.00 pm on Mondays and Wednesdays. My room number is 652 in 721 Broadway and the telephone extension is 9981614. The course will run each Thursday between 6.00 and 9.00 p.m. in Room 648 of the same building, beginning on 7 September 1995 and running through to 7 December 1995. Thanksgiving takes away our class on 23 November. For the first ten weeks there will be a prescriptive syllabus. We'll decide on the form of the last few weeks in the light of student interests and/or the need to go over materials a second time. RATIONALE H72.3006 is worth 3 points towards your degree. It is NOT available to people who have incompletes with me as at September 1995. This course is designed to give doctoral students across the University who are interested in cultural studies the opportunity to work on topics connected to subjectivity and the popular. It picks up from a number of issues and approaches addressed in the Popular Culture and Everyday Life seminar of Spring 1995 (although this is NOT intended to discourage new students from joining Techniques of the Self). The seminar has twin tasks. BLOCK I provides time, space, and resources to engage in close analytic work on a number of theorists of subjectivity: Seyla Benhabib.
  • Section Membership

    Section Membership

    SECTIONS 81 Section membership Fellows are assigned to a ‘Section of primary allegiance’ of their choice. It is possible to belong to more than one Section (cross-membership, by invitation of the Section concerned); this is approved by Council, the members to serve for a period of five years. In the following pages cross-members are listed after primary members, together with their primary Section and the date of appointment. The Emeritus Fellows of each Section are also listed separately. And the primary affiliation of Corresponding Fellows is also indicated. Membership of the Ginger Groups is listed on page 97. * Indicates membership of Section Standing Committee.
  • Lectures and Seminars, Michaelmas Term 2016

    Lectures and Seminars, Michaelmas Term 2016

    WEDNESDAY 5 OCTOBER 2016 • SUPPLEMENT (2) TO NO 5143 • VOL 147 Gazette Supplement Lectures and Seminars, Michaelmas term 2016 Charles Simonyi Lecture 30 Clinical Neurosciences China Centre Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Hebrew and Jewish Studies Experimental Psychology Islamic Studies Race and the Curriculum in Medicine Reuters Institute for the Study of Oxford Lecture 30 Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Journalism Musculoskeletal Sciences Reuters Institute/Nuffield Romanes Lecuture 30 Pathology Latin American Centre Pharmacology Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Humanities 30 Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics Oxford Martin School Population Health Population Ageing TORCH | The Oxford Research Centre in Psychiatry Voltaire Foundation – Besterman Centre the Humanities for the Enlightenment TORCH/Asian Studies Centre/Oxford Social Sciences 38 Centre for Global History/Modern Colleges, Halls and Societies 48 European History Centre/ Maison Anthropology and Museum Ethnography Française Education Green Templeton Rothermere American Institute Geography and the Environment Hertford Classics Blavatnik School of Government Keble English Language and Literature Kellogg English/History/History of Art/Music/ Interdisciplinary Area Studies Theology International Development Lady Margaret Hall History Law Mansfield History of Art Politics and International Relations Nuffield Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics Politics and International Relations/ Queen’s Oriental Studies Interdisciplinary Area Studies St Anne’s Philosophy Social Policy