DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Ownership and Exclusive Rights of Fisheries Means of Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Ownership and Exclusive Rights of Fisheries Means of Production Study On Ownership and Exclusive Rights of Fisheries Means of Production Final Report Service Contract: EASME/EMFF/2016/1.3.2.1/SI2.766458 MRAG, AZTI & NEF February – 2019 Final Report EUROPEAN COMMISSION Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Unit A.3 — EMFF E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Study on ownership and exclusive rights of fisheries means of production Service Contract: EASME/EMFF/2016/1.3.2.1/SI2.766458 EASME/EMFF/2017/016 Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 2018 EN Final Report Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 ISBN: 978-92-9202-453-6 doi: 10.2826/246952 © European Union, 2019 Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ I LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................ VII LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................ X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... XII RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................................... XVIII 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 24 Study scope .................................................................................... 24 Objectives ...................................................................................... 25 Approach ........................................................................................ 25 Task 1: Ownership of vessels, licences and quotas ................... 26 Ownership and patterns of ownership ..................................... 27 Task 2: Concentration of ownership ....................................... 30 Task 3: Evolution of ownership .............................................. 33 2. FINDINGS ............................................................................................... 35 Key challenges ................................................................................ 35 MS-specific challenges .......................................................... 36 Belgium .......................................................................................... 39 Vessels ............................................................................... 39 Licences ............................................................................. 39 Quotas ............................................................................... 39 Ownership .......................................................................... 40 Denmark ........................................................................................ 43 Vessels ............................................................................... 43 Licences ............................................................................. 43 Quotas ............................................................................... 44 Ownership .......................................................................... 45 Evolution of ownership ......................................................... 48 France ............................................................................................ 53 Vessels ............................................................................... 53 Licences ............................................................................. 54 Quotas ............................................................................... 54 Ownership .......................................................................... 54 Germany ........................................................................................ 62 Vessels ............................................................................... 62 Licences ............................................................................. 62 Quotas ............................................................................... 62 Ownership .......................................................................... 63 Ireland ........................................................................................... 67 Vessels ............................................................................... 67 Licences ............................................................................. 67 Quotas ............................................................................... 68 Ownership .......................................................................... 68 Netherlands .................................................................................... 72 Vessels ............................................................................... 72 Licences ............................................................................. 72 i Final Report Quotas ............................................................................... 72 Ownership .......................................................................... 72 Spain ............................................................................................. 76 Vessels ............................................................................... 76 Licences ............................................................................. 77 Quotas ............................................................................... 78 Ownership .......................................................................... 79 Sweden .......................................................................................... 92 Vessels ............................................................................... 92 Licences ............................................................................. 92 Quotas ............................................................................... 93 Ownership .......................................................................... 93 United Kingdom ............................................................................... 99 Vessels ............................................................................ 99 Licences ............................................................................ 99 Quotas .......................................................................... 102 Ownership ........................................................................ 104 Evolution of ownership ....................................................... 108 Overview of EU MS covered ............................................................ 110 Ownership of fishing vessels ................................................ 110 Ownership of quota ............................................................ 110 Comparison ....................................................................... 113 Choke species ................................................................... 117 3. CASE STUDIES ON MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ..................................... 120 Case study 1: Spanish fleets targeting cod, halibut and other demersal fish in the north Atlantic ................................................................. 120 Scope and relevance .......................................................... 120 Institutional and regulatory context ...................................... 120 Sub-case study 1: Freiremar S.A. ........................................ 120 Sub-case study 2: Pesquera Ancora S.L. ............................... 122 Case study 2: Iberconsa and Portobello capital .................................. 125 Scope and relevance .......................................................... 125 Institutional and regulatory context ...................................... 125 Company characteristics ..................................................... 126 Transactions and outcomes ................................................. 127 Key findings ...................................................................... 128 Case study 3: Garavilla and Bolton Group ......................................... 129 Scope and relevance .......................................................... 129 Institutional and regulatory context ...................................... 129 Company characteristics ..................................................... 129 Transaction and outcomes .................................................. 130 Key findings ...................................................................... 131 Case study 4: Clearwater Seafood’s acquisition of Macduff .................. 131 Scope and relevance .......................................................... 131 Institutional and regulatory context .....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Fishing Techniques Midwater Pair Trawling Main Components Aquatic species Target Species Semi-pelagic/demersal species Atlantic herring European pilchard(=Sardine) Seabream Hake Seabass European sprat Target Species Pelagic species Gear types: Midwater pair trawls Midwater pair trawls It has similar characteristics as midwater trawls used with otter boards. Vessel types: Pair trawlers In the wet-fish trawler the fish is kept in the hold in the fresh/"wet" condition. Characteristics Midwater pair trawling Species Environment Midwater pair trawling can be effective in different situations: when fish are aggregated into large dense shoals and when (at another season or time of the day or according to physiological status) fishes are regularly distributed within a given water layer. In addition to the difference it makes whether the FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department fish are aggregated in a small volume or spread within a large one, fish may swim (and avoid the net) at different speeds according to its own physiological status and/or other external conditions. As a result, in addition to the fish which is targeted, other different conditions will affect the design and size of the midwater trawl, as well as the towing speed. Fishing Gear A midwater pair trawl has roughly similar design as other midwater trawls. Midwater pair trawls might, however, be designed to have a more rectangular opening than ordinary midwater otter trawls. Midwater pair trawls might be rigged with two towing warps from each vessel or alternatively with one towing warp from each vessel and a bridle arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultancy Report an Overview )F Vessels, Gearand Fishingtechniques Practicedin the Fisheriesof Peru
    Consultancy Report An Overview )f Vessels, Gearand FishingTechniques Practicedin the Fisheriesof Peru Peru: Export Trade and Development Program 527-0349-A-00-1275-00 Prepared by: W. Douglas Souter Prepared for: Agricultural Cooperative Development International 50 F Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 Phone: 202/638-4661 Fax: 202/626-8726 December 7, 1993 AN OVERVIEW OF VESSELS, GEAR AND FISHING TECHNIQUES PRACTICED IN THE FISHERIES OF PERU Submitted to: Asociaci6n de Exportadores (ADEX) Avenida Santo Toribio 151 San Isidro Lima, PERU By: W. Douglas Souter San Diego, California For: Agricultural Cooperative Development International Washington, D.C. December 7, 1993 CONTENTS I. PREFACE .............................................. 1 II. PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................... 2 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................. 3 IV. BACKGROUND ............................................. 7 V. PURSE SEINE VESSELS ENGAGED IN THE ANCHOVETA/ SARDINA/JUREL/CABELLA FISHERY .................. 8 Background 8 Discussion and Recommendations 9 VI. BOTTOM-TRAWL VESSELS ENGAGED IN THE MERLUSA FISHERY.. 11 Background 11 Operating and On-Board Handling Practices 12 Discussion end Recommendations 12 VII. BOTTOM PAIR TRAWLING FOR MERLUSA ..................... 14 Background 14 Vessels 15 Trawl Nets 15 Discussion and Recommendations 16 VIII. MID-WATER TRAWLING .............................. 18 IX. SINGLE VESSEL MID-WATER TRAWLING FOR JUREL AND CABELLA .................. ....... o.............o........ 19 Background 19 Vessels 19 Trawl Nets 20 Discussion and Recommendations 20 X. MID-WATER PAIR TRAWLING FOR JUREL AND CABALLA........ 21 Background 21 Vessels 21 Trawl Nets 21 Discussion and Recommendations 22 XI. VESSEL REFRIGERATION ....................... ........ 23 Refrigerated Sea Water 23 Pumping System 23 Fish Hold 23 Refrigeration Systems 24 Chilled Sea Water 26 Icing of Fish 29 XII. VESSEL SANITATION .............. ...................... 30 Discussion and Recommendations 30 CONTENTS Page XIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Recent Examples of Fishing Gear Technology Development Or
    MFR PAPER 1235 The resul t of the program and the interest in quid by the Southern New E ngland fi shing industry is illustrated Som e Recent Examples of Fishing in Table 1 which compares the spring Gear Technology Development or landi ngs of 1975 with those of 1976. Transfer in New England HERRING Pelagic pair-trawli ng fo r herring wa adopted by the New England ROBERT E. TABER industry through the effort of the University of Rh ode Island (URI ) Sea Fishing gear development or techno­ Robert E Taber is with the Uni­ Grant Program about 5 years ago. logy transfer supported by a variety versity of Rhode Island Marine Since that time the method has been offunding sources is currently being Advisory Service, Kingston, RI adopted by vessels from Cape May, conducted in New England by universi­ 02881 . .J., to Boothbay Harbor , Maine, with ties. state fisheries agencies. or non ­ because of the manner in which the interest also developing on the possi­ profit fis heries corporations. The fund ­ quid reacted to light from May to bility of bottom pair-trawling. Funding ing sources for these efforts have. for ovember of 1974. It was demonstrat­ from the Southern New England the most part. been through the New ed that the squid could be conce ntrated Development Program has enabled the England Fisheries Development Pro­ in approximately a 200 -foot diameter URI Marine Advisory Service to gram. local Sea Grant programs. or the area around a vessel to a depth of 5 succes fu ll y introduce this technique to Southern New England Fisheries De­ fathoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Statoil-Chapter 14 Commercial Fisheries
    Commercial fisheries Table of Contents 14 COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 14-1 14.1 Introduction 14-1 14.2 Legislative context and relevant guidance 14-2 14.3 Scoping and consultation 14-2 14.4 Baseline description 14-3 14.4.1 Introduction 14-3 14.4.2 Data gaps and uncertainties 14-3 14.4.3 Fishing activity overview 14-4 14.4.4 Description of individual fisheries 14-9 14.4.5 Key ports and vessel numbers 14-23 14.4.6 Salmon and sea trout fishery 14-23 14.4.7 Aquaculture 14-25 14.5 Impact assessment 14-25 14.5.1 Overview 14-25 14.5.2 Assessment criteria 14-25 14.5.3 Design Envelope 14-26 14.5.4 Data gaps and uncertainties 14-27 14.6 Impacts during construction and installation 14-27 14.6.1 Loss of access to fishing grounds 14-27 14.7 Impacts during operation and maintenance 14-29 14.7.1 Loss of access to fishing grounds 14-29 14.8 Potential variances in environmental impacts (based on Design Envelope) 14-29 14.9 Cumulative and in-combination impacts 14-29 14.9.1 Potential cumulative and in-combination impacts during construction and installation 14-30 14.9.2 Potential cumulative and in-combination impacts during operation and maintenance 14-30 14.9.3 Mitigation requirements for potential cumulative and in-combination impacts 14-30 14.10 Long term initiatives 14-30 14.11 References 14-30 Hywind Scotland Pilot Park Project – Environmental Statement Assignment Number: A100142-S35 Document Number: A-100142-S35-EIAS-001-008 iii 14 COMMERCIAL FISHERIES A desk based review of available data was undertaken supported by consultation with fishermen.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Framework Book
    Chapter Eight Urbanization, 1880 to 1930 Industrial Expansion and the Gilded Age Progressive Era The Roaring Twenties 1880 to 1900 1900 to 1920 1920 to 1929 1880’s 1888 1900 1900-1910 1914-1918 1920 1929 ||||||| Skipjack America’s Region Internal World Region Stock sailboats first electrified population combustion War I population Market first trolley line, reaches engines exceeds Crash produced Richmond 3 million 4.5 million AN ECOLOGY OF PEOPLE SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND PLACE ▫ 1880’s–wooden ▫ 1894–protestors, ▫ 1918–worldwide skipjack sailing known as Coxey’s Spanish influenza Ⅺ PEOPLE vessels specially Army, march on epidemic strikes adapted to Washington region Extraordinary changes swept across the Chesapeake waters demanding economic ▫ first produced reform 1918–Migratory Bird United States and the world between Treaty Act outlaws 1880 and 1930 (see Map 10). These ▫ 1882–Virginia ▫ 1898 to 1899– killing of whistling changes continued to alter Chesapeake Assembly approves Spanish-American swans, establishes funding to establish War fought with hunting seasons, and Bay life, from the countryside to the city. Normal and Spain sets bag limits on The region’s population doubled, from Collegiate Institute international ▫ 2.5 million in 1880 to 5 million by 1930. for Negroes and 1900–region migratory waterfowl Central Hospital for population reaches Many of these people settled in estab- ▫ mentally ill African- 3 million 1920–regional population exceeds lished rapidly expanding urban centers Americans in ▫ 1900 to 1910– 4.5 million such as Baltimore, Washington, Petersburg internal combustion ▫ Richmond, and Norfolk. Washington’s ▫ 1886–adoption of engines power first 1921–captured numbers grew at an incredible pace, ris- standard gauge links commercially German battleship successful wheeled Ostfriesland ing from about 75,000 in 1880 to 1.4 mil- all railroads in region and nation vehicles and (renamed the San lion by 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries (Nelson Commercial Fishing Restrictions) Notice 1984. (2) This Notice Shall Come Into Force on the Day After the Date of Its Notification in the Gaz.Ette
    1984/96 THE FISHERIES (NELSON COMMERCIAL FISHING RESTRICTIONS) NOTICE 1984 PURSUANT to section 89 of the Fisheries Act 1983 and the Fisheries (Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1983, the Director-General of Agriculture and Fisheries hereby gives the following notice. ANALYSIS I. Title and commencement 7. Fishing restrictions 2. Interpretation 8. Taking snapper in Tasman Bay and 3. Restrictions on drag netting Golden Bay 4. Trawling prohibited 9. Taking scallops 5. Trawling in Pelorus Sound permitted sub­ 10_ Taking mussels ject to certain restrictions 11. Taking oysters 6. Pair trawling prohibited in Tasman Bay 12. Revocation NOTICE 1. Title and commencement-(I) This notice may be cited as the Fisheries (Nelson Commercial Fishing Restrictions) Notice 1984. (2) This notice shall come into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gaz.ette. 2. Interpretation-(l) In this notice, unless the context otherwise requires,- "Cod-end" means that end part of a net which is normally closed during fishing and is capable of holding fish while in the water; and includes, in respect of a net carried on a vessel- (a)Up to 10 m overall length ofvessel, not less than the last 3 m of net: (b) Ten to 20 m overall length of vessel, not less than the last 5 m of net: (c) Twenty to 30 m overall length ofvessel, not less than the last 10 m of net: (d)Thirty to 40 m overall length of vessel, not less than the last 15 m of net: . (e) Over 40 m overall length ofvessel, not less than the last 20 m of net: "Danish seine net" means a net which has a
    [Show full text]
  • 2/14/03 News Release From
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (ST MICHAELS, MD – August 30, 2011) OysterFest is November 5 at CBMM From 10-4pm on Saturday, November 5, celebrate the Chesapeake’s oyster at the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum’s (CBMM) OysterFest in St. Michaels, MD. The event features live music, oysters and other food, children’s activities, boat rides, oyster demonstrations and harvesting displays, retriever demonstrations, cooking demonstrations, and an oyster stew competition among regional chefs. The folk, blues and jazz sounds of B-Natural of Chestertown will entertain guests with live music throughout the day. Band member Pres Harding is the grandson of Bronza Parks—the legendary Dorchester County boatbuilder of the museum’s skipjack, Rosie Parks. The skipjack once sailed the Chesapeake dredging for oysters, and is now undergoing a three-year restoration at the museum. The Talbot County Watermen’s Association will have several boats dockside to help share the stories of how oyster dredging, hand tonging, patent tonging and diving for oysters have been longtime traditions of the Chesapeake Bay. The Talbot County Watermen’s Association will also be offering freshly caught Chesapeake Bay oysters on the half shell. Hatchery-raised raw oysters and fried oyster sandwiches will also be made available. For those who prefer to learn about oysters rather than eat them, pit beef, cold beer, caramel apples, apple cider and more will also be available. An oyster slurping contest among festival-goers and an oyster stew competition among regional chefs will earn bragging rights for the winners, with limited samples of oyster stew served up beginning at 11am.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Bass Fishing and Dolphins
    Sea Bass Fishing and Dolphins Standard Note: SN/SC/3191 Last updated: 20 January 2010 Author: Christopher Barclay Section Science and Environment Section This note describes the problem of dolphin by-catch in the sea bass fishery. The Defra website has a useful, frequently updated, page on Fishing: whales and dolphins (http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-pets/wildlife/protect/whales/index.htm). Another note covers sea bass fishing generally, Sea Bass Fishing (SN/SC/745). Contents 1 Cetacean (dolphin and porpoise) by-catch 2 2 Defra’s closure of the bass fishery in 2004 4 3 The European Commission refuses to widen the closure 2005 5 4 The European Commission position 6 5 The dismissal of Greenpeace’s Judicial Review, October 2005 7 6 How effective is the 12 mile ban? 8 7 Progress in late 2008 and in 2009 9 This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Maldives Project for the Formulation of Master Plan for Sustainable Fisheries (Masplan)
    Republic of Maldives Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture REPUBLIC OF MALDIVES PROJECT FOR THE FORMULATION OF MASTER PLAN FOR SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES (MASPLAN) Final Report Separate Volume January 2018 Japan International Cooperation Agency INTEM Consulting, Inc. Fisheries & Aquaculture International Co., Ltd. Table of Contents 1. Sustainable Fisheries Development Plan of the Important Sub-sectors in the Maldives 2. Technical Reports as Outputs of the Pilot projects PP-1. Technical development and verification of live bait catch and holding for improving their survival rate 1) Field technical report of the Pilot Project 1 2) Monitoring survey report of Pilot Project 1 by MNU PP-2. Technical development of tuna hand line on-board handling for fish quality improvement 1) Field technical report of the Pilot Project 2 2) Monitoring survey report of Pilot Project 2 by MNU PP-3. Preliminary resource survey on availability of deep-sea resources 1) Final report of Pilot Project 3: Preliminary resource survey on availability of deep-sea resources PP-4. Monitoring of fish supply to resorts and setting up of an ecolabel certification 1) Report on Survey on Reef Fish Landings to Tourist Resorts 2) Guidelines on Best Fishing and Fish Handling Practices 3) Overview of reef fish sampling in K. Dhiffushi – Nov-Dec 2016 PP-5. Feasibility study on mariculture of selected species in Maldives 1) Applicable method of Groupers and Sandfish culture in Maldives 2) Pilot Study on Grow-out Culture of Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) in Bottom-set Sea Cages in Lagoon 3) Grouper Grow-out Operations in the Maldives 4) Small-scale Sandfish Grow-out Operations in the Maldives PP-6.
    [Show full text]
  • European Trawlers Are Destroying the Oceans
    EUROPEAN TRAWLERS ARE DESTROYING THE OCEANS Introduction Nearly 100,000 vessels make up the European Union fishing fleet. This includes boats that fish both in EU waters (the domestic fleet), in the waters of other countries and in international waters (the deep-sea fleet). In addition, there is an unknown number of vessels belonging to other European countries that are not members of the EU which could approach a figure half that of the EU fleet. The majority of these vessels sail under the flag of a European country but there are also boats, particularly those fishing on the high seas, which despite being managed, chartered or part owned by European companies, use the flag of the country where they catch their fish or sail under flags of convenience (FOCs). The Fisheries Commission has called for a reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) to achieve a reduction of 40% in the EU fishing capacity, as forecasts show that by simply following the approved multi-annual plans, barely 8.5% of vessels and 18% of gross tonnage would be decommissioned1; an achievement very distant from scientific recommendations. Moreover, from among these almost 100,000 vessels, the EU is home to a particularly damaging fleet: the 15,000 trawlers that operate in European waters, as well as those of third countries or those fishing on the high seas. These trawlers are overexploiting marine resources and irreversibly damaging some of the most productive and biodiverse ecosystems on the planet. The 40% reduction called for by the Commission could be easily achieved if the primary objective of this proposal was focused both on eliminating the most destructive fishing techniques and reducing fishing overcapacity.
    [Show full text]
  • How Fish Are Caught
    How fish are caught Wild fish can be caught in a variety of different ways, from the traditional rod and line to traps and trawl nets large enough to capture a passenger airplane. Fishing gears can be categorized as either mobile/active or static/passive depending on whether they are towed across the seabed or fixed to it. Mobile/active gear includes any trawls, trolling and drifting nets or lines whereas static/passive gear includes fixed nets, traps and rod and line. Generally static /passive gear has a lower impact on the seabed. Here are the most commonly used fishing methods with a brief explanation of how they work and their environmental impacts. Beam trawl In this type of trawl, the mouth or opening of the net is kept open by a beam, which is mounted at each end on guides or skids which travel along the seabed. The trawls are adapted and made more effective by attaching tickler chains (for sand or mud) or heavy chain matting (for rough, rocky ground) depending on the type of ground being fished. These drag along the seabed in front of the net, disturbing the fish in the path of the trawl, causing them to rise from the seabed into the oncoming net. Electrified ticklers, which are less damaging to the seabed, have been developed but used only experimentally. Work is also being carried out to investigate whether square mesh panels (see below) fitted in the ‘belly’ or lower panel of the net can reduce the impact of beam trawling on communities living on or in the seabed.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Maldivian Fishing
    History of Maldivian Fishing Traditionally fishery is the main occupation and major livelihood of the Maldivian. It is also the second largest industry in the Maldives. The main methods of fishing are pole and line for Skipjack tuna. The second most important fish caught is the yellow fin tuna. The main fish products exported are; frozen fish, canned fish, dried fish and salted dry fish. The traditional fishing vessel, a sailing ‘Dhoni’, is less than 15 feet long. Thatch sails were used in the early days of fishing, which have been replaced by sail-cloths and rowing. The Maldivian fishery is famous in the world for its dolphin friendliness. The modern fishing vessel revolutionized the Maldivian fishing industry, enabling the fisherman to sail further distances. It meant that the direction and speed of the wind were no longer determinants of the distances traveled by fishermen in search of fish. Establishment of cold storage facilities was another important landmark in the development of the fisheries industry. In the past, the Maldives exported tuna primarily in the dried and smoked form called ‘Hiki Kandumas’ or 'Maldive Fish' to Sri Lanka. Maldives also exported other forms of fish products to Japan and Thailand. All prices are in US$ and are inclusive of service charge & goods and services tax Aperitif Start your extravagant evening with an aperitif to pave the way to a unique dining. US$ 25 Kir Royal Champagne and Crème de Cassis Bellini Champagne and Peach Schnapps Funa Fizz Champagne, Apple Juice, Grenadine & Soda FUNA Appetizers
    [Show full text]