DOCSLIB.ORG

Road Management Plan Brighton Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Road Management Plan Brighton Road ROAD MANAGEMENT PLAN (SHORT TO MEDIUM TERM) BRIGHTON ROAD (ANZAC HIGHWAY, GLENELG TO SCHOLEFIELD ROAD, SEACLIFF PARK) OCTOBER 2017 Brighton Road - Road Management Plan Date Revisions Amended by Aug 2010 Rev A - Draft for consultation A Townsend Feb 2011 Rev B – Re-formatting and updating D Lee Jan 2012 Rev C – Incorporation of feedback from the City of R Timmings Holdfast Bay and the City of Marion. Sept 2013 Rev D – Further amendments following council and Martin community consultation. Comments and response Elsworthy attached as appendix. Oct 2014 Rev E – Bike lane operating times updated to reflect K Aryan approved times Dec 2014 Rev F - Crash data updated to reflect the recent 2009 K Aryan to 2013 crashes Jan 2017 Final - updated crash data (2011 to 2015), completed P McBride treatments and re-formatting/editing - i Brighton Road - Road Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 OVERVIEW - 1 - 2 EXISTING ROAD ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................................................... - 2 - 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. - 2 - 2.2 BEHAVIOUR OF TRAFFIC AND LAND USE................................................................................................... - 3 - 2.3 ROAD CROSS SECTION .............................................................................................................................. - 6 - 2.4 PARKING PROVISION .................................................................................................................................. - 9 - 2.4.1 On Road Parking .............................................................................................................................. - 9 - 2.4.2 Off Road Parking .............................................................................................................................. - 9 - 2.5 PUBLIC TRANSPORT ................................................................................................................................... - 9 - 2.6 METROPOLITAN AREA ROAD WIDENING PLAN (MARWP) .................................................................... - 11 - 2.7 ASSET SUSTAINMENT (ASSET MANAGEMENT) ....................................................................................... - 11 - 2.7.1 Road Pavement .............................................................................................................................. - 11 - 2.7.2 Structures ......................................................................................................................................... - 12 - 2.7.3 Electrical Assets .............................................................................................................................. - 12 - 2.7.4 Routine Maintenance ..................................................................................................................... - 12 - 3 ROAD ROLE AND FUNCTION .............................................................................................................. - 14 - 3.1 FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES ......................................................................................................................... - 14 - 4 ROAD SAFETY ......................................................................................................................................... - 16 - 4.1 SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CRASHES .................................................................................................... - 16 - 4.2 UNSIGNALISED INTERSECTION CRASHES ............................................................................................... - 18 - 4.3 SPEED ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................................................. - 19 - 4.4 PEDESTRIANS ........................................................................................................................................... - 19 - 4.4.1 Schools ............................................................................................................................................. - 19 - 4.4.2 Train/Tram Station Pedestrian Movements ............................................................................... - 20 - 4.4.3 Glenelg Oval .................................................................................................................................... - 20 - 4.5 BICYCLE LANES ........................................................................................................................................ - 22 - 4.6 ROAD LIGHTING ........................................................................................................................................ - 24 - 5 ROAD CAPACITY .................................................................................................................................... - 25 - 5.1 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................................ - 25 - 5.2 MID-BLOCK PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................................... - 25 - 6 TRAFFIC ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... - 27 - 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS ........................................................................ - 27 - 6.1.1 Brighton Road / ANZAC Highway / Tapleys Hill Road ............................................................ - 27 - 6.1.2 Brighton Road / Jetty Road (Glenelg) ......................................................................................... - 27 - 6.1.3 Brighton Road / Diagonal Road / Pier Street ............................................................................. - 28 - 6.1.4 Brighton Road / Whyte Street / Oaklands Road ....................................................................... - 30 - 6.1.5 Brighton Road / The Crescent ...................................................................................................... - 31 - 6.1.6 Brighton Road / Jetty Road (Brighton) ........................................................................................ - 32 - 6.1.7 Brighton Road / Sturt Road ........................................................................................................... - 34 - 6.1.8 Brighton Road / Seacombe Road ................................................................................................ - 34 - 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UNSIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS ................................................................... - 37 - 6.2.1 General Recommendations .......................................................................................................... - 37 - 6.2.2 Brighton Road / Augusta Street ................................................................................................... - 37 - 6.2.3 Brighton Road / High Street .......................................................................................................... - 38 - 6.2.4 Brighton Road / Tassie Street ...................................................................................................... - 39 - 6.2.5 Brighton Road / Cudmore Street / Elgar Road .......................................................................... - 41 - 6.2.6 Brighton Road / Holder Road ....................................................................................................... - 42 - 6.2.7 Brighton Road / Crombie Street ................................................................................................... - 43 - 6.2.8 Brighton Road / Keelara Street .................................................................................................... - 44 - 6.2.9 Brighton Road / Hartley Road ...................................................................................................... - 46 - 6.2.10 Brighton Road / Yarmouth Street ................................................................................................ - 46 - 6.2.11 Brighton Road / Scholefield Road / Ocean Boulevard ............................................................ - 48 - 6.3 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MID-BLOCK SECTIONS ................................................................................... - 50 - 6.3.1 Section 1 – ANZAC Highway to Jetty Road (Glenelg)............................................................. - 51 - 6.3.2 Section 2 – Jetty Road (Glenelg) to Diagonal Road ................................................................ - 52 - 6.3.3 Section 3 – Diagonal Road to Oaklands Road ......................................................................... - 53 - 6.3.4 Section 4 – Oaklands Road to The Crescent ............................................................................ - 53 - 6.3.5 Section 5 – The Crescent to Jetty Road (Brighton) ................................................................. - 54 - - ii Brighton Road - Road Management Plan 6.3.6 Section 6 – Jetty Road (Brighton) to Sturt Road ...................................................................... - 55 - 6.3.7 Section 7 – Sturt Road to Seacombe Road ............................................................................... - 55 - 6.3.8 Section 8 – Seacombe Road to Scholefield Road ................................................................... - 56 - 6.3.9 General Recommendations – Bus Stops……………………………………………………..-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Gibraltar Highway Code
    P ! CONTENTS Introduction Rules for pedestrians 3 Rules for users of powered wheelchairs and mobility scooters 10 Rules about animals 12 Rules for cyclists 13 Rules for motorcyclists 17 Rules for drivers and motorcyclists 19 General rules, techniques and advice for all drivers and riders 25 Road users requiring extra care 60 Driving in adverse weather conditions 66 Waiting and parking 70 Motorways 74 Breakdowns and incidents 79 Road works, level crossings and tramways 85 Light signals controlling traffic 92 Signals by authorised persons 93 Signals to other road users 94 Traffic signs 96 Road markings 105 Vehicle markings 109 Annexes 1. You and your bicycle 112 2. Vehicle maintenance and safety 113 3. Vehicle security 116 4. First aid on the road 116 5. Safety code for new drivers 119 1 Introduction This Highway Code applies to Gibraltar. However it also focuses on Traffic Signs and Road Situations outside Gibraltar, that as a driver you will come across most often. The most vulnerable road users are pedestrians, particularly children, older or disabled people, cyclists, motorcyclists and horse riders. It is important that all road users are aware of The Code and are considerate towards each other. This applies to pedestrians as much as to drivers and riders. Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/ MUST NOT’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study and Analysis of Existing Road Junction
    Special Issue - 2016 International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 SNCIPCE - 2016 Conference Proceedings A Study and Analysis of Existing Road Junction Bavithran. R, Sasikumar. N Ms. G. Yamuna,.. Asst Professor Department of Civil Engg Department of Civil Engg V.R.S College of Engg & Tech, Araur, VPM Dst V.R.S College of Engg & Tech, Araur, VPM Dst Abstract - Road junction is the point at which more than are also three major groups of sedimentary rocks, layers of two roads are connecting at the point. The junction is particles that settled in different geological periods. analyzed by Volume Count Survey. The volume count survey Viluppuram's GPS location is 11° 56' N 79° 29' E. is one of the methods of finding out the Traffic volume. The Villupuram is the one of the most popular city in junction which is situated in Villupuram is taken as study tamilnadu. In this project, an existing road junction is area. In this junction, the volume count survey is taken for 15 days for determine the Passenger Car Unit and the Level Of studied and analyzed by using volume count survey.. Some Service for the junction is computed. To improve the information are to be carried before the project has started. junction, some suggestions are suggested. The greener time of the Traffic flow from Chennai, Trichy, thirukovillur, Pondicherry are 20 sec, 25 Keywords:- Volume count survey, Peak hour, Passenger sec, 15 sec, and 20 sec respectively. CCTV is provided car unit, Level of service from junction to junction near veeravaliamman temple.
    [Show full text]
  • Released Under Foi
    File 2018/15258/01 – Document 001 Applicant Name Applicant Type Summary All briefing minutes prepared for Ministers (and ministerial staff), the Premier (and staff) and/or Deputy Premier (and staff) in respect of the Riverbank precinct for the period 2010 to Vickie Chapman MP MP present Total patronage at Millswood Station, and Wayville Station (individually) for each day from 1 Corey Wingard MP October 30 November inclusive Copies of all documents held by DPTI regarding the proposal to shift a government agency to Steven Marshall MP Port Adelaide created from 2013 to present The total annual funding spent on the Recreation and Sport Traineeship Incentive Program Tim Whetstone MP and the number of students and employers utilising this program since its inception A copy of all reports or modelling for the establishment of an indoor multi‐sports facility in Tim Whetstone MP South Australia All traffic count and maintenance reports for timber hulled ferries along the River Murray in Tim Whetstone MP South Australia from 1 January 2011 to 1 June 2015 Corey Wingard MP Vision of rail car colliding with the catenary and the previous pass on the down track Rob Brokenshire MLC MP Speed limit on SE freeway during a time frame in September 2014 Request a copy of the final report/independent planning assessment undertaken into the Hills Face Zone. I believe the former Planning Minister, the Hon Paul Holloway MLC commissioned Steven Griffiths MP MP the report in 2010 All submissions and correspondence, from the 2013/14 and 2014/15 financial years
    [Show full text]
  • US-60/Grand Avenue Corridor Optimization, Access Management, and System Study (COMPASS)
    US-60/Grand Avenue COMPASS Loop 303 to Interstate 10 TM 3 – National Case Study Review US-60/Grand Avenue Corridor Optimization, Access Management, and System Study (COMPASS) Loop 303 to Interstate 10 Technical Memorandum 3 National Case Study Review Prepared for: Prepared by: Wilson & Company, Inc. In Association With: Burgess & Niple, Inc. Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Philip B. Demosthenes, LLC March 2013 3/25/2013 US-60/Grand Avenue COMPASS Loop 303 to Interstate 10 TM 3 – National Case Study Review Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose of this Paper ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Michigan 1 (M-1)/Woodward Avenue – Detroit, Michigan ................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Access to Urban/Suburban Areas ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Corridor Access Control ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Road Network Selection for Small-Scale Maps Using an Improved Centrality-Based Algorithm
    JOURNAL OF SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE Number 9 (2014), pp. 71–99 doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2014.9.166 RESEARCH ARTICLE Road network selection for small-scale maps using an improved centrality-based algorithm Roy Weiss and Robert Weibel Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Received: January 31, 2014; returned: March 13, 2014; revised: July 29, 2014; accepted: August 18, 2014. Abstract: The road network is one of the key feature classes in topographic maps and databases. In the task of deriving road networks for products at smaller scales, road net- work selection forms a prerequisite for all other generalization operators, and is thus a fun- damental operation in the overall process of topographic map and database production. The objective of this work was to develop an algorithm for automated road network selec- tion from a large-scale (1:10,000) to a small-scale database (1:200,000). The project was pur- sued in collaboration with swisstopo, the national mapping agency of Switzerland, with generic mapping requirements in mind. Preliminary experiments suggested that a selec- tion algorithm based on betweenness centrality performed best for this purpose, yet also exposed problems. The main contribution of this paper thus consists of four extensions that address deficiencies of the basic centrality-based algorithm and lead to a significant improvement of the results. The first two extensions improve the formation of strokes concatenating the road segments, which is crucial since strokes provide the foundation upon which the network centrality measure is computed. Thus, the first extension en- sures that roundabouts are detected and collapsed, thus avoiding interruptions of strokes by roundabouts, while the second introduces additional semantics in the process of stroke formation, allowing longer and more plausible strokes to built.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Introduction 2.0 General Observations
    Core Bus Corridor 9: Greenhills - Preliminary Submission 1.0 Introduction Dublin Cycling Campaign is a registered charity that advocates for better cycling conditions in Dublin. Dublin Cycling Campaign is the leading member of Cyclist.ie, the Irish Cycling Advocacy Network (ICAN). We wants to make Dublin a safe and friendly place for everyone of all ages to cycle. There are many welcome segments to the Greenhills to City Centre route that have the potential to deliver a high-quality route. However, these good sections are let down by poorly managed detours for cyclists, gaps in the cycling provision and poor details. The proposals for Kildare Road in particular are both unsafe and a poor alternative to the Crumlin Road. There are some high-level issues with the current proposals. We understand that the NTA is currently at a preliminary concept design stage. This is reassuring as many of the details of the proposed cycling facilities need to be improved in order to enable safe cycling for people of all ages and abilities. We look forward to future engagement with the NTA to resolve the major issues and refine the details in later stages so that we can produce a high-quality result similar to the Fairview/North Strand cycle route. 2.0 General Observations 2.1 There are some clear improvements Though we are critical of parts of the concept design in many areas, there are already positive improvements proposed for pedestrians and cyclists within this concept design. These include: ● Extensive use of cycle track segregation throughout the corridor. 1 ● The redesign of the Walkinstown Roundabout to reduce the number of traffic lanes and to install safe crossing features, although we disagree with the proposal for ‘shared space’, as it will de-prioritise cyclists.
    [Show full text]
  • Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study
    Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study Final Report May 2012 Prepared for the: Arizona Department of Transportation Prepared by: Jacobs 101 N. 1ST Ave. Suite 3100 Phoenix, AZ 85003 P: 602.253.1200 F: 602.253.1202 www.jacobs.com ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City of Apache Junction Council Members Mayor John S. Insalaco Robin Barker Doug Coleman Rick Dietz Jeff Serdy Clark Smithson Chip Wilson Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Charla Glendening, Project Manager, ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Giao Pham, P.E, City Engineer/Interim Director, Public Works, City of Apache Junction Steve Filipowicz, Director Economic Development, City of Apache Junction Nick Blake, Parks Superintendent, City of Apache Junction Brett Jackson , Police Lieutenant, Apache Junction Police Department Dan Campbell, Fire Chief, Apache Junction Fire District Dave Montgomery, Chief Fire Marshall, Apache Junction Chad Wilson, Superintendent, Apache Junction Unified School District Bill Leister, Transportation Director, Central Arizona Association of Governments Michelle Green, Project Manager, Arizona State Land Department Doug Hansen, Planning Section Chief, Pinal County Greg Stanley, P.E., Director / County Engineer, Pinal County Alan Sanderson, Deputy Transportation Director, City of Mesa Ken Hall, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Mesa Tim Oliver, Systems Planning Manager, Maricopa County Department of Transportation Felicia Terry, Regional Planning Director, Maricopa County Flood Control District Pat Brenner, Community Relations Manager, City of Apache Junction Angelita
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Land Study the City of Charles Sturt
    Quality Endorsed Company ISO 9002 Lic 6350 Standards Australia INDUSTRIAL LAND STUDY VOLUME 1 UNDER INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE CITY OF CHARLES STURT APRIL 2008 OUR REFERENCE: PA1566 R0089 Colliers International Consulting Services (SA) ABN 20 031 866 033 Level 10 Statewide House 99 Gawler Place Adelaide SA 5000 CHARLES STURT INDUSTRIAL LAND STUDY – APRIL 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Charles Sturt has around 560Ha of Industry zoned land in 22 separate precincts, scatted across much of its domain. It is over a decade since there was a comprehensive review of this zoning. This study is a precursor to such a review. It considers Charles Sturt’s industrial land stock through the prism of:- • its broader economic and development policy settings; • the Rezoning Assessment Framework established by the Metropolitan Adelaide Industrial Land Strategy; and • the development planning and other issues arising from this analysis and assessment. Industry’s economic contribution to the city is clearly important and must be protected. It provides both jobs for the local community and export income for the region, and it has the capacity to remain a vital part of the City’s economic make-up for the next generation and beyond. At the same time however, there are other strategic development planning drivers at work, including population policy and the looming shortage of residential land in metropolitan Adelaide over the next decade, which will result in ongoing pressure for new, higher density models of infill development. Some of this pressure will be on existing industrial land. Addressing both sides of this strategic equation will require that decisions about the ongoing role of industry in Charles Sturt’s economic and social fabric be made “on balance”.
    [Show full text]
  • South of the City
    South of the city. 7daysinmarion.com.au Introduction Coastal Marion Sturt Central Marion Tonsley Oaklands Park Morphettville Edwardstown Enjoy 7 Days in Marion Getting Around Public transport is available Welcome to the City of Marion. The ‘7 Days in Marion’ throughout the City of Marion. Guide will help you to enjoy the experiences and people The Glenelg tram line services of our city. the northern parts of the City of Marion, while the Seaford train line and Tonsley train Covering an area of about 55 square kms and featuring line service the central and 7kms of coastline. Only 20 minutes drive south west southern areas. of Adelaide, the City of Marion offers a mix of cultural, Bus services run throughout sporting, leisure and shopping experiences. All against the City of Marion. a backdrop of hills, open space and the coast. All of these services run to and from the City at regular This guide will help you find out where you can walk intervals. along a spectacular coastline, stroll through an art For more information about gallery, hit the cycle paths, cool off at a pool and get public transport please visit close to nature. adelaidemetro.com.au There are options for those who want to hone their skateboarding skills or soak up local Indigenous culture. With plenty of places to eat, play, shop and stay, we have established seven daily itineraries to assist your visit. Take this guide, or use the website, get together with family and friends, say hello to the locals and discover the City of Marion.
    [Show full text]
  • 167 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    167 bus time schedule & line map 167 City View In Website Mode The 167 bus line (City) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) City: 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM (2) Glenelg: 6:17 AM - 11:54 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 167 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 167 bus arriving. Direction: City 167 bus Time Schedule 42 stops City Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 9:00 AM - 11:01 PM Monday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM Zone B Colley Tce - West side 15 Colley Terrace, Glenelg Tuesday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM Stop 21B Anzac Hwy - North side Wednesday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM 615 Anzac Highway, Glenelg Thursday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM Stop 21A Anzac Hwy - North side Friday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM 595 Anzac Highway, Glenelg Saturday 8:00 AM - 11:01 PM Stop 30 Tapleys Hill Rd - South West side 8 Fulton Street, Glenelg Stop 29T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side 61 Tapleys Hill Road, Glenelg North 167 bus Info Direction: City Stop 28T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side Stops: 42 81 Tapleys Hill Road, Glenelg North Trip Duration: 28 min Line Summary: Zone B Colley Tce - West side, Stop Stop 27T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side 21B Anzac Hwy - North side, Stop 21A Anzac Hwy - 2A Clovelly Avenue, Glenelg North North side, Stop 30 Tapleys Hill Rd - South West side, Stop 29T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side, Stop 28T Stop 26 Blackburn Rd - North side Tapleys Hill Rd - West side, Stop 27T Tapleys Hill Rd - 8 Leak Avenue, Glenelg North West side, Stop 26 Blackburn Rd - North side, Stop 25 Blackburn Ave - North East side, Stop 24 Blackburn Stop 25 Blackburn
    [Show full text]
  • SA Speed Survey Results 2008 Road Type Speed Limit Street Suburb
    SA Speed Survey Results 2008 Percentage Number of all of Percentage vehicles Vehicles Average of all exceeding Passing Speed of vehicles the speed during the all exceeding limit by Speed week of vehicles the speed more than Road Type Limit Street Suburb/Town sampling (km/h) limit 10km/h Adelaide local 50 Gilbertson Road Seacliff Park 3227 51.9 62.8 17.5 Adelaide local 50 Coorara Avenue Payneham South 18229 51.2 58.3 10.7 Adelaide local 50 Bermudez Crescent Paralowie 8342 49.8 50.5 10.1 Adelaide local 50 Hambledon Road Campbelltown 13400 49.8 49.4 8.9 Adelaide local 50 Main Street Beverley 6332 48.1 44.1 10.3 Adelaide local 50 Vincent Road Smithfield Plains 1541 46.1 36.1 9.3 Adelaide local 50 Northcote Street Kilburn 7988 45.1 29.0 5.1 Adelaide local 50 Charles Road Beverley 5462 41.8 20.9 4.3 Adelaide local 50 Adelaide Street Maylands 2873 42.1 20.8 2.2 Adelaide local 50 London Drive Salisbury East 7469 37.6 20.0 3.7 Adelaide local 50 Commercial Street Marleston 5349 38.6 19.1 3.2 Adelaide local 50 Archer Street North Adelaide 15525 43.2 18.6 1.5 Adelaide local 50 North Esplanade Glenelg North 11603 40.7 14.7 1.8 Adelaide local 50 Olive Avenue Broadview 2604 39.5 9.2 1.1 Adelaide local 50 Bowyer Street Rosewater 3375 37.4 5.6 0.7 Adelaide local 50 Andrew Avenue Salisbury East 1541 36.9 2.3 0.1 Adelaide local 50 Farrell Street Glenelg South 2231 33.5 2.2 0.2 Adelaide local 50 George Street Adelaide 6372 28.4 0.6 0.0 Adelaide collector 50 Scenic Way Hackham 7665 53.7 68.5 23.6 Adelaide collector 50 Perry Barr Road Hallett Cove 13996 51.3
    [Show full text]
  • South Road Upgrade (Torrens Road to River Torrens) Project Report
    South Road Upgrade (Torrens Road to River Torrens) Project Report Introduction What is this report? This document has been prepared to provide an overview of the findings of the South Road Planning Study to upgrade the section from Torrens Road to the River Torrens. The planning study has investigated a broad range of possible options. It has developed and assessed a concept design for the preferred option for this project as the next step in delivering Adelaide’s non‐stop north‐south corridor. This document is intended to inform residents, property owners and businesses, along with the general public, of the State Government’s plans for this significant piece of transport infrastructure. If you have further questions after reading this document, please contact the South Road Planning Study Team via the contact details provided on the last page of this booklet. Why does Adelaide need a North‐South Corridor? Through its Seven Strategic Priorities the South Australian Government has detailed its economic, social and environmental goals. They include creating a vibrant city, safe communities and healthy neighbourhoods, affordable places to live and growing advanced manufacturing. The transport system plays a critical role in achieving these goals. Adelaide’s transport system is, however, facing major challenges over the next 30 years, the most critical of these being the provision of safe and efficient transport options for Adelaide’s residents and businesses. Due to the projected growth of South Australia’s North‐South Corridor economy and population, additional demands will be placed on infrastructure, especially transport infrastructure. South Road is part of the National Land Transport Network through urban Adelaide and is the major north‐south traffic and freight route through Adelaide’s west.
    [Show full text]