University of London Thesis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS DegreeYear j2~oO Name of Author p fir PA ■—Co ° ^ / ^Vt>vL^rv-^ C O P Y R IG H T This is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London. It is an unpublished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide by the Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOANS Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the Senate House Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the premises of those libraries. Application should be made to: Inter-Library Loans, Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the Senate House Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962.Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The Senate House Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962- 1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 - 1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied. This thesis comes within category D. This copy has been deposited in the Library of ----------------------------------:— This copy has been deposited in the Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. C:\Documents and SeUings\lproctor\Loca! Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK8\Copyright - thesis (2).doc “A COMMENTARY ON SELECTED FRAGMENTS OF MIDDLE COMEDY” ATHINA PAPACHRYSOSTOMOU A thesis submitted for the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics UNIVERSITY OF LONDON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON UMI Number: U593095 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U593095 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The period of Middle Comedy comprises more than fifty poets and more than one thousand fragments. In my thesis I study six of these poets; Amphis, Aristophon, Dionysius, Mnesimachus, Philetaerus, and Theophilus. The study takes the form of a commentary on the more substantial fragments of these poets. The commentary deals with philological and textual issues. Through the use of antecedents and parallels where available, it also places the fragments within the context of the surviving corpus for each author and the comic tradition in order to trace the main motifs, trends, and patterns of this period. In many cases Old Comedy stands as the antecedent, and often Middle Comedy appears to pave the way for Menander and New Comedy. The picture that emerges is that of simultaneous continuity and change of Greek Comedy. Wherever possible I attempt to reconstruct at least the theme and on occasion the plot outline of the plays. My commentary is preceded by an introduction, where I deal with the question of the validity of the term “Middle Comedy”, look briefly into the recent research relating to Middle Comedy, discuss questions of sources and their problems, and lay out the methodology that I deploy throughout the commentary. 3 Statement of Authenticity This dissertation is the result of my own work, includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, and does not exceed the permitted length of 100000 words (including footnotes and references but excluding bibliography). Athina Papachrysostomou 4 Table of Contents • Abstract ....................................................................................2 • Statement of Authenticity ...................................................... 3 • Table of Contents ....................................................................4 • Acknowledgements ................................................................ 5 • Abbreviations .......................................................................... 6 - 8 • General Introduction ...............................................................9-28 • Amphis.....................................................................................29-99 • Aristophon.................................................................................. 100-148 • Dionysius .................................................................................... 149-181 • Mnesimachus ..............................................................................182-219 • Philetaerus ...................................................................................220-246 • Theophilus.................................................................................. 247-280 • Bibliography............................................................................... 281-302 5 Acknowledgments For the completion of this thesis I feel greatly thankful to my supervisor, Professor Chris Carey. He constantly supported me throughout, giving me valuable feedback, guiding my research and saving me from many wrong turns. I would like to thank him for his incessant assistance, from answering instantly - but still comprehensively - to my e-mails, to arranging frequent meetings to discuss my work, despite his busy schedule. His help to me has been priceless, and there are no words to express my gratitude. I would also like to thank my second supervisor, Mr Alan Griffiths, for his help during the early stages of my thesis, and also Professor Cornelia Roemer, for her support whenever I needed some advice. I also owe many thanks to the staff of the library of the Institute of Classical Studies, for their valuable help that extended even beyond their duties. But the completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the financial support of the “Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation (Greek Section of Scholarships and Research)”, who generously granted me a scholarship for a 48 months period. This proved absolutely vital, for I was able to concentrate exclusively on my research, without having to work to sustain myself. I would also like to express my deep gratitude to the lecturers of University of Athens Dr. Vassilis Lentakis and Dr. Elli Filokyprou, for their genuine friendship, and extremely valuable help and guidance. Special thanks are due to my fiance, Dr. Georgios Vlachos, for his emotional support and encouragement during the final - and most critical - stages of my thesis. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my parents, Christophoros and Antonia, who supported me throughout, both financially and emotionally, and to whom I dedicate this thesis. 6 Abbreviations For ancient authors and works this thesis follows the abbreviations used by LSJ (ninth edition 1940, with new supplement added 1996). The comic fragments are cited according to the numbering of Kassel-Austin’s edition, unless otherwise stated. The following abbreviations are also used: • CAH: The Cambridge Ancient History • CGFP: Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta in Papyris Reperta • CIG: Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum • DK: Diels-Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker • EpGF: Epicorum Graecorum Fragmenta • Fasti: Fasti Hellenici • FGrH: Die Fragmente der Griechischer Historiker • FHG: Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum • GG: Grammatici Graeci • GGM: Geographi Graeci Minores • IG: Inscriptiones Graecae • LGPN: A Lexicon o f Greek Personal Names • LIMC: Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae • PA: Prosopographia Attica • PMG: Poetae Me lie i Graeci • P MG F: Poet arum Melicorum Graecorum Fragmenta • PPF: Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta • SEG: Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum • SH: Supplementum Hellenisticum • SVF: Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta • TGF: Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta • V.: Voigt, Sappho et Alcaeus Amott: Alexis: The Fragments: A Commentary Baiter & Sauppe: Oratores Attici 7 • Beazley, Paralipomena: Paralipomena: Additions to “Attic Black-figure Vase- painters” and to “Attic Red-figure Vase-painters ” • Bechtel, Spitznamen : ZJze einstdmmigen mannlichen Personennamen des Griechischen, die aus Spitznamen hervorgegangen sind 9 ----------Frauennamen: Die attischen Frauennamen • ----------Personennamen: Die historischen Personennamen der Griechischen bis zur Kaiserzeit • Bekker Anecdota: Anecdota Graeca • Bieber HT: History o f the Greek and Roman Theater • Breitenbach Titulorum: De genere quodam titulorum comoediae Atticae • Denniston GP: Greek Particles • Edmonds: Elegy and Iambus with the Anacreontea • Herwerden Collectanea: Collectanea critica, epicritica, exegetica sive Addenda ad Theodori Kockii opus Comicorum Atticorum Fragmenta • Hunter: Eubulus: The Fragments • Jacobs Additamenta: Additamenta animadversionum