ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND Rice University Sociology Department, MS-28 P.O
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Religion Among Academic Scientists Questionnaire
FINAL WEB 5/09/2005Ecklund WEB SURVEY Thank you for participating in this ten-minute web survey sponsored by Rice University. I emphasize that this is a research study and all information you provide is protected by law and will be kept strictly confidential. Your identity and that of your institution will not be disclosed in any findings that are disseminated about the study. If you have questions, or want to confirm the legitimacy of this research, SRBI National Public Policy Research Center can be reached toll-free at 1-800-772-9287. Please ask for study #3472. For concerns about human subjects, the chair of Rice University's Institutional Review Board may be contacted at [email protected]. For any other questions about the study, please email me directly at [email protected]. Thanks again for your participation. Sincerely, Elaine Howard Ecklund Elaine Howard Ecklund, PhD Principal Investigator Religion and Ethics among Academic Scientists (REAS) Postdoctoral Fellow Rice University Sociology Department-MS 28 P.O. Box 1892 Houston, TX 77251-1892 http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~soci/People/ecklund.htm First some questions about your academic career. [IF SAMPLETYPE=1] 1a. Which one of the following best describes your academic rank? [q28, changed categories for MDs] 1) Assistant Professor 2) Associate Professor, with tenure 3) Professor, with tenure 4) Clinical Appointment, please specify__________________ 5) Other, please specify_____________________ 6) No answer [IF SAMPLETYPE=2] 1b Which one of the following best describes your academic rank? [q28] 1 Elaine Howard Ecklund, Ph.D. Rice University FINAL WEB 5/09/2005Ecklund 1) Assistant Professor 2) Associate Professor, with tenure 3) Professor, with tenure 5) Other, please specify__________________ 6) No answer [Qualification Level 1] [IF SAMPLETYPE=1] 2a1. -
Cultural Theorizing Has Dramatically Increased
Cultural CHAPTER 9 Theorizing Another Embarassing Confession Like the concept of social structure, the conceptualization of culture in sociology is rather vague, despite a great deal of attention by sociologists to the properties and dynamics of cul- ture. There has always been the recognition that culture is attached to social structures, and vice versa, with the result that sociologists often speak in terms of sociocultural formations or sociocultural systems and structures. This merging of structure and culture rarely clarifies but, instead, further conflates a precise definition of culture. And so, sociology’s big idea— culture—is much like the notion of social structure. Its conceptualization is somewhat meta- phorical, often rather imprecise, and yet highly evocative. There is no consensus in defini- tions of culture beyond the general idea that humans create symbol systems, built from our linguistic capacities, which are used to regulate conduct. And even this definition would be challenged by some. Since the 1980s and accelerating with each decade, the amount of cultural theorizing has dramatically increased. Mid-twentieth-century functional theory had emphasized the importance of culture but not in a context-specific or robust manner; rather, functional- ism viewed culture as a mechanism by which actions are controlled and regulated,1 whereas much of the modern revival of culture has viewed culture in a much more robust and inclusive manner. When conflict theory finally pushed functionalism from center stage, it also tended to bring forth a more Marxian view of culture as a “superstructure” generated by economic substructures. Culture became the sidekick, much like Tonto for the Lone Ranger, to social structure, with the result that its autonomy and force indepen- dent of social structures were not emphasized and, in some cases, not even recognized. -
Jason Springs CV
JASON A. SPRINGS Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies [email protected] Keough School for Global Affairs Cell. 617-233-2765 University of Notre Dame Office: 574-631-0931 305 Hesburgh Center updated: July 2020 Notre Dame, IN 46556 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2020- Professor of Religion, Ethics, and Peace Studies Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies University of Notre Dame 2015-20 Associate Professor of Religion, Ethics, and Peace Studies Director of Doctoral Studies, 2016-18 2008-2015 Assistant Professor of Religion, Ethics, and Peace Studies University of Notre Dame 2006-08 Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Religion, American University (Washington, DC), Dept. of Philosophy and Religion EDUCATION 2005 Ph.D., A.M., Harvard University, Committee on the Study of Religion, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences 2000 MDiv, Princeton Theological Seminary, May 2000, ethics, philosophy of religion 1996 M.A., Baylor University, 1996, Modern philosophy 1995 B.A., Georgetown College, 1995, cum laude, Majors: Philosophy, English Lit FELLOWSHIPS AND GRANTS 2018 Resident Member Fellowship, Center of Theological Inquiry, Princeton, NJ, Fall semester, Seminar on Religion and Violence (declined) 2015-16 The Louisville Institute, Sabbatical Grant for Researchers, Project: Restorative Justice and the New Jim Crow 2005-06 Princeton University, Post-doctoral Fellow in Christian Thought and Practice, Center for the Study of Religion, Princeton, NJ BOOKS In draft Resurrection in Back of the Yards: Restorative Justice and Lived Religion on Chicago’s South and West Sides 2018 Jason A. Springs, Healthy Conflict in Contemporary American Society: From Enemy to Adversary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 2013 Jason A. Springs and Atalia Omer, Religious Nationalism: A Reference Handbook (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio) [equal authorship]. -
Can Faith Be More Than a Side Show in the Contemporary Academy? by Robert Wuthnow Published On: Feb 12, 2007
Can Faith Be More Than a Side Show in the Contemporary Academy? By Robert Wuthnow Published on: Feb 12, 2007 Robert Wuthnow teaches sociology of religion and cultural sociology, specializing in the use of both quantitative and qualitative (historical and ethnographic) research methods. He has written America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity (Princeton University Press, 2005), and edited the Encyclopedia of Politics and Religion (Congressional Quarterly Books, 1998). The following essay will appear in The American University in a Postsecular Age: Religion and Higher Education (Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2007), edited by Douglas Jacobsen and Rhonda Hustedt Jacobsen. Copyright © Oxford University Press. I am a sociologist by training and a dyed-in-the-wool empiricist by temperament, but the role of religion in the academy is not one that can be addressed from a firm empirical base. From time to time, one hears arguments that students are much more interested in religion or more comfortable expressing their faith on campus now than they were, say before the tragedy of September 11, 2001, or that faculty on secular campuses are more accepting of religious believers than they were a generation ago. We are tantalized in these speculations by the occasional result from national surveys of college freshmen or by reports of enrollments in religious studies courses.1 There are also the valuable historical studies that George Marsden, James Burtchaell, and others have done, or the more contemporary studies of Conrad Cherry, Richard Hughes, or John Schmalzbauer.2 Yet, whenever I approach this topic wearing my empiricist hat, I feel much less confident than I do about almost any other aspect of American religion. -
West Virginia University Department of Sociology 307 Knapp Hall Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected]
CHRISTOPHER P. SCHEITLE West Virginia University Department of Sociology 307 Knapp Hall Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. The Pennsylvania State University, Sociology, August 2008 M.A. The Pennsylvania State University, Sociology, May 2005 B.A. Trinity University, magna cum laude, Sociology and Religion, May 2003 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2020-Current Associate Professor, West Virginia University 2015-2020 Assistant Professor, West Virginia University 2010- 2015 Adjunct Assistant Professor, St. John’s University (MN) 2008-2010 Senior Research Assistant, Penn State University, University Park RESEARCH INTERESTS Religion and Science, Religious Discrimination and Victimization, Religious Organizations, Sexuality, Identity TEACHING INTERESTS Data Analysis and Social Statistics, Research Methods, Sociology of Religion, Wealth and Poverty EXTERNAL FUNDING 2020-2022 Sociology of Science and Religion: Identity and Belief Formation Funding Initiative. $167,797 – Principal Investigator (with Katie E. Corcoran) for “Religion, Science, and the Enchanted Worldview.” 2018-2021 National Science Foundation. $162,254 – Principal Investigator for “Religion and the Professional Development of Graduate Students in the Sciences.” 2018-2020 National Science Foundation. $250,000 – Principal Investigator (with Elaine Howard Ecklund) for “Collaborative Research: Religion Related Bias Victimization: Addressing a Blind-Spot.” 2017-2018 Interfaith Diversity Experiences & Attitudes Longitudinal Survey Research Award. $7,500 – Principal Investigator for “Examining the Worldview Influences of Non-Religious Students.” 2014-2015 National Science Foundation. $299,369 – Principal Investigator (with Jeff Ulmer) for “Collaborative Research: The Frequency and Patterns of Crime Against Religious Congregations.” 2010-2013 National Science Foundation. $286,834 – Principal Investigator (with John McCarthy) for “Nonprofit Religious Organizations and Entrepreneurialism.” 1 2009 Higher Education Research Institute Spirituality in Higher Education Research Award. -
SOC 532: SOCIOLOGY of RELIGION Fall 2009 Richard L. Wood, Associate Professor of Sociology Thursdays 4:00-6:30 Pm, 1061 SSCI (Sociology Commons)
SOC 532: SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION Fall 2009 Richard L. Wood, Associate Professor of Sociology Thursdays 4:00-6:30 pm, 1061 SSCI (Sociology Commons) Office Hours: Mondays 2:00-3:00 p.m.1078 SSCI, 505-277-3945 Thursdays 2:00-3:00 p.m.1078 SSCI, 505-277-3945 or mornings at 401 Hokona-Zuni, by appointment via 277-1117 [email protected] fax: 505-277-1115 This course is designed to introduce students to a broad range of sociological work on religion. The course will emphasize the social and political implications of religious dynamics, but we will also pay attention to broader elements of religion. The field is a vast one, and even a serious, graduate-level course can only skim the surface; students are encouraged to delve more deeply into their particular interests via the term paper project. The course includes a variety of theoretical approaches, and comparative-historical, survey, network-analytic, and ethnographic methodological approaches are all included. We will discuss the relative advantages that different theoretical and methodological approaches offer for generating sociological insight into religion and society. The content of the course will be weighted heavily toward understanding religion and society in three settings: the United States, Latin America, and the Middle East. However, the theoretical and methodological tools learned will be useful for the sociology of religion in whatever settings draw your interests (and term papers can certainly be written on a wide variety of topic areas). Goals of the course: At the end of semester (if you prepare the readings well, engage actively in thoughtful discussion, and complete the other assignments), you will have laid strong intellectual foundations for doing graduate-level scholarship on religion (comprehensive exams, master’s thesis, dissertation research, etc.). -
SOCIOLOGY of RELIGION Robert Wuthnow These Readings Will Expose You to the Central Ideas That Have Shaped the Sociology of Relig
SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION Robert Wuthnow These readings will expose you to the central ideas that have shaped the sociology of religion. The list emphasizes major theoretical and theoretically informed substantive contributions, including some from anthropology and history as well as sociology. The basic readings are starred (*) and should be read carefully. Following each set of basic readings is a short selection of supplementary readings. These are meant to provide more recent and/or advanced understanding of how the core perspective has been extended or applied, or in some cases to suggest alternative approaches and applications. You should pick one of these supplementary readings from each section. In most instances, you may pick either a more theoretically oriented reading or a more empirically oriented study, depending on your interests. Mastering the basic readings and one supplementary reading from each section will give you about 90 percent of what you need to know for the General Examination in sociology of religion. The remaining 10 percent should be composed of recent literature in a sub- area related to your dissertation interests. The reading course will meet each week for one to one and a half hours. Please write and circulate a two-page memo in advance summarizing your thoughts about what you have read and raising questions for discussion. If the week's readings are new to you, focus on the basic readings; if you are already familiar with the basic readings, review them and come prepared to make a short presentation about one of the supplementary readings. For an extensive bibliography and sampling of topics covered in an undergraduate course in sociology of religion, see Meredith McGuire, Religion: The Social Context, 5th ed. -
1 Yale University • Department of Sociology • PO Box 208265 • New
ESTHER D. CHAN Yale University • Department of Sociology • PO Box 208265 • New Haven, CT 06520 [email protected] estherdchan.com October 7, 2019 EDUCATION In Progress Ph.D., Sociology, Yale University (expected May 2020) Social Imaginaries of Diversity: Race, Gender, and Sexuality on an Evangelical University and a Secular University Committee: Philip Gorski (co-chair), Grace Kao (co-chair), Rene Almeling 2017 M.Phil., Sociology, Yale University 2016 M.A., Sociology, Yale University 2012 B.A., Sociology, Summa Cum Laude, University of California, San Diego RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration; Religion; Science and Medicine; Gender and Sexuality; Education; Mixed Methods PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS Forthcoming Chan, Esther. “Does Diversity Include Me? Colorblindness and Racial Triangulation Among Asian Americans on Two College Campuses.” Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2018 Chan, Esther. “Are the Religious Suspicious of Science? Investigating Religiosity, Religious Context, and Orientations Towards Science Cross- Nationally.” Public Understandings of Science 27(8):967-984. 2018 Collins, Stephen C., Soorin Kim, and Esther Chan. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Utilization of Prayer and Clergy Counseling by Infertile US Women Desiring Pregnancy.” Journal of Religion and Health 57(6): 2230–2240. 2017 Collins, Stephen C. and Esther Chan. “Sociocultural Determinants of US Women’s Ethical Views on Various Fertility Treatments.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 35(6):669-677. 2017 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Jared Peifer, Virginia White, and Esther Chan. “Moral Schemas in Articulation and Intuition: How Religious People Evaluate Human Reproductive Genetic Technologies.” Sociological Forum 32(2):277-297. 1 2016 Chan, Esther and Elaine Howard Ecklund. “Narrating and Navigating Authorities: Evangelical and Mainline Protestant Interpretations of the Bible and Science.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55(1):54-69. -
Examining Links Between Religion, Evolution Views, and Climate
EABXXX10.1177/0013916516674246Environment and BehaviorEcklund et al. 674246research-article2016 Article Environment and Behavior 1 –22 Examining Links Between © 2016 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: Religion, Evolution sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0013916516674246 Views, and Climate eab.sagepub.com Change Skepticism Elaine Howard Ecklund1, Christopher P. Scheitle2, Jared Peifer3, and Daniel Bolger1 Abstract Recent media portrayals link climate change skepticism to evolution skepticism, often as part of a larger “antiscience” tendency related to membership in conservative religious groups. Using national survey data, we examine the link between evolution skepticism and climate change skepticism, and consider religion’s association with both. Our analysis shows a modest association between the two forms of skepticism along with some shared predictors, such as political conservatism, a lack of confidence in science, and lower levels of education. Evangelical Protestants also show more skepticism toward both evolution and climate change compared with the religiously unaffiliated. On the whole, however, religion has a much stronger and clearer association with evolution skepticism than with climate change skepticism. Results contribute to scholarly discussions on how different science issues may or may not interact, the role of religion in shaping perceptions of science, and how science policy makers might better channel their efforts to address environmental care and climate change in particular. 1Rice University, Houston, TX, USA 2West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA 3Baruch College, New York, NY, USA Corresponding Author: Elaine Howard Ecklund, Department of Sociology, Rice University MS-28, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77006, USA. Email: [email protected] Downloaded from eab.sagepub.com by guest on November 2, 2016 2 Environment and Behavior Keywords climate change, evolution, religion, evangelicals, skepticism Skepticism toward scientific claims is not a new phenomenon. -
ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND Rice University Sociology Department, MS-28 P.O
ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND Rice University Sociology Department, MS-28 P.O. Box 1892 Houston, TX 77251-1892 Phone: 713-348-6761 Email: [email protected] August 1, 2019 ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2013-Present Herbert S. Autrey Chair in Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Rice University. 2013-Present Professor, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2011-2013 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2008-2011 Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, Rice University. 2006-2008 Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY. 2004-2006 Postdoctoral Fellow, Sociology Department, Rice University. ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP 2018-2019 President, Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2010-Present Founding Director, Religion and Public Life Program, Rice University. 2017-Present Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2013-2015 Director, Boniuk Institute for the Study and Advancement of Religious Tolerance, Rice University. 2011-2014 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2008-2009 Associate Director, Center on Race, Religion, and Urban Life, Rice University. AFFILIATE ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS AND HONORS 2018 Gifford Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, Scotland 2018-Present Faculty Affiliate, Chao Center for Asian Studies, Rice University. 2014-Present Faculty Affiliate, Department of Religion, Rice University. 2010-Present Rice Scholar, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. EDUCATION 2001-2004 Ph.D., Sociology, Cornell University, August, 2004. 2001-2002 Visiting Graduate Student Fellow, Princeton University. 1998-2001 MA, Sociology, Cornell University, January, 2001. 1991-1995 BS, Human Development, Cornell University, May, 1995. MAJOR GRANTS 2018-2020 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (Christopher P. Scheitle, Co-PI), “Religion-Related Bias Victimization: Addressing a Blind-Spot,” National Science Foundation ($249,998, Grant #1753972). -
Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee
ESTHER D. CHAN [email protected] estherdchan.com August 12, 2020 EMPLOYMENT 2020 - Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee 2020 - Non-Resident Research Fellow, Religion and Public Life Program, Rice University EDUCATION 2020 Ph.D., Sociology, Yale University Social Imaginaries of Diversity: Race, Gender, and Sexuality on an Evangelical University and a Secular University Committee: Philip Gorski (co-chair), Grace Kao (co-chair), Rene Almeling 2017 M.Phil., Sociology, Yale University 2016 M.A., Sociology, Yale University 2012 B.A., Sociology, Summa Cum Laude, University of California, San Diego RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration; Religion; Science and Medicine; Gender and Sexuality; Mixed Methods PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS Forthcoming Chan, Esther. “Does Diversity Include Me? Colorblindness and Racial Triangulation Among Asian Americans on Two College Campuses.” Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2018 Chan, Esther. “Are the Religious Suspicious of Science? Investigating Religiosity, Religious Context, and Orientations Towards Science Cross- Nationally.” Public Understandings of Science 27(8):967-984. 2018 Collins, Stephen C., Soorin Kim, and Esther Chan. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Utilization of Prayer and Clergy Counseling by Infertile US Women Desiring Pregnancy.” Journal of Religion and Health 57(6): 2230–2240. 2017 Collins, Stephen C. and Esther Chan. “Sociocultural Determinants of US Women’s Ethical Views on Various Fertility Treatments.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 35(6):669-677. 1 2017 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Jared Peifer, Virginia White, and Esther Chan. “Moral Schemas in Articulation and Intuition: How Religious People Evaluate Human Reproductive Genetic Technologies.” Sociological Forum 32(2):277-297. 2016 Chan, Esther and Elaine Howard Ecklund. -
“Science Vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think” Dr. Elaine Howard Ecklund and Barbara Bradley Hagerty November 2010 Conversations
ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think” Dr. Elaine Howard Ecklund Rice University Barbara Bradley Hagerty NPR November 2010 MICHAEL CROMARTIE: Professor Elaine Howard Ecklund has written this new book called Science v. Religion: What Scientists Really Think, which is a wonderfully unique take on the question because we usually read subjects on what religious people think about science. We are delighted to have Dr. Ecklund here this morning. We’re also delighted that Barbara Bradley Hagerty could be here because Barbara has written a New York Times best selling book on religion and spirituality and science. So it’s wonderful to have you both here. DR. ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND: There’s the perception out there that scientists are completely “areligious” and that they’re even beyond being “areligious.” They are against religion completely, right? I’m a sociologist, and I think sociology at its best often gives us research that’s very deeply surprising and sort of challenges our worldviews and dispels common myths that we believe about ourselves and the world around us. My most recent research is on religion, spirituality and ethics among scientists, research I’ve been working on for the past five years, where I’ve surveyed 2,500 natural and social scientists at the top U.S. research universities, and I’ve achieved a 75 percent response to the initial survey I did, which is very high for survey research. I surveyed them at places like Harvard University, University of Chicago, top state schools like Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and I also followed up by having a lot of face-to-face ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “Science vs.