ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND Rice University Sociology Department, MS-28 P.O

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND Rice University Sociology Department, MS-28 P.O ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND Rice University Sociology Department, MS-28 P.O. Box 1892 Houston, TX 77251-1892 Phone: 713-348-6761 Email: [email protected] August 1, 2019 ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2013-Present Herbert S. Autrey Chair in Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Rice University. 2013-Present Professor, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2011-2013 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2008-2011 Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, Rice University. 2006-2008 Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY. 2004-2006 Postdoctoral Fellow, Sociology Department, Rice University. ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP 2018-2019 President, Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2010-Present Founding Director, Religion and Public Life Program, Rice University. 2017-Present Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2013-2015 Director, Boniuk Institute for the Study and Advancement of Religious Tolerance, Rice University. 2011-2014 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Sociology, Rice University. 2008-2009 Associate Director, Center on Race, Religion, and Urban Life, Rice University. AFFILIATE ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS AND HONORS 2018 Gifford Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, Scotland 2018-Present Faculty Affiliate, Chao Center for Asian Studies, Rice University. 2014-Present Faculty Affiliate, Department of Religion, Rice University. 2010-Present Rice Scholar, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. EDUCATION 2001-2004 Ph.D., Sociology, Cornell University, August, 2004. 2001-2002 Visiting Graduate Student Fellow, Princeton University. 1998-2001 MA, Sociology, Cornell University, January, 2001. 1991-1995 BS, Human Development, Cornell University, May, 1995. MAJOR GRANTS 2018-2020 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (Christopher P. Scheitle, Co-PI), “Religion-Related Bias Victimization: Addressing a Blind-Spot,” National Science Foundation ($249,998, Grant #1753972). 2017-2021 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (Denise Daniels, Co-PI), “Faith at Work: An Empirical Assessment,” Lilly Endowment, Inc. ($1,500,000, Grant #2017 0021). 2017-2020 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, “Reaching Evangelical American Leaders to Change Hearts and Minds (REAL CHANGE),” Templeton Religion Trust ($216,155, Grant #TRT0191). 2017-2018 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (David R. Johnson, Co-PI), “Communicating Outlooks for a New Global Religion and Science Synergy: The Interpretive Challenge (CONGRESS I),” Templeton Religion Trust ($233,766, Grant #TRT0157). 2012-2015 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, (Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Steven Lewis, Co-PIs), “Ethics among Physicists in Cross-National Context (EASIC),” National Science Foundation ($299,688, Grant #1237737). 2012-2015 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, “Religious Understandings of Science (RUS),” John Templeton Foundation ($1,087,000, Grant #38817). 2012-2015 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Steven Lewis, Co-PIs), “Religion among Scientists in International Context (RASIC) – A Supplement Request for Including Scientists in India,” Templeton World Charity Foundation ($366,714). 2012-2015 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, (Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Steven Lewis, Co-PIs), “Religion among Scientists in International Context (RASIC),” Templeton World Charity Foundation ($2,057,000, Grant #TWCF0033/AB14). 2009 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (Anne E. Lincoln, Southern Methodist University, Co-PI), “Perceptions of Women in Academic Science,” National Science Foundation ($55,154, Grant #GSE0920837), additional competitive grant in support of existing research. 2007-2011 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI (Anne E. Lincoln, Southern Methodist University, Co-PI), “Perceptions of Women in Academic Science,” National Science Foundation ($299,334, Grant #GSE0920837). 2 Elaine Howard Ecklund 2007-2010 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, (Michael O. Emerson, Rice University, Co-PI) “Religion and the Changing Face of American Civic Life,” Russell Sage Foundation ($190,149, Grant #88-07-10). 2006 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, “Religion among Academic Scientists,” The John Templeton Foundation ($10,000), additional merit-based grant made in support of existing research. 2005-2009 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, PI, “Religion and Spirituality among Natural and Social Scientists at Elite Research Universities,” The John Templeton Foundation ($283,549). BOOKS 2019 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, David R. Johnson, Brandon Vaidyanathan, Kirstin R. W. Matthews, Steven W. Lewis, Robert A. Thomson Jr., and Di Di, Secularity and Science: What Scientists Around the World Really Think About Religion, Oxford University Press. 2017 Ecklund, Elaine Howard and Christopher Scheitle, Religion Vs. Science: What Religious People Really Think, Oxford University Press (Reviews in Publishers Weekly, Patheos, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Theos Think Tank, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, Sociology of Religion). 2016 Ecklund, Elaine Howard and Anne E. Lincoln, Failing Families, Failing Science: Work- Family Conflict in Academic Science. New York: New York University Press (Reviews in Times Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, PsycCRITIQUES, Social Forces, Sociologie du Travail, Sex Roles, American Journal of Sociology). 2010 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Science Vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press (Reviews in Publisher’s Weekly, Discover Magazine, Chronicle of Higher Education, The Washington Post, Books and Culture, Times Higher Education, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Sociology of Religion, Review of Religious Research, Beliefnet, New York Journal of Books, Library Journal, Christianity Today, Social Forces, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith). 2006 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Korean American Evangelicals: New Models for Civic Life. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press (Reviews in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research, Sociology of Religion, Christian Century, Evangelical Studies Journal, Journal of Asian American Studies, and American Journal of Sociology). PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES AND BOOK CHAPTERS 2019 Sorrell, Katherine, Simranjit Khalsa, Elaine Howard Ecklund, and Michael O. Emerson, “Immigrant Identities and the Shaping of a Racialized American Self,” forthcoming, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. 2019 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Sharan Kaur Mehta, and Daniel Bolger, “A Way Forward for Sociological Research on Science and Religion: A Review and A Riff,” forthcoming, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science. 2019 Bolger, Daniel, Robert A. Thomson Jr., and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Selection Versus Socialization? Interrogating the Sources of Secularity in Global Science,” Sociological 3 Elaine Howard Ecklund Perspectives, published online: https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/iZQGAXeHmeefkAWJtdDy/full. 2019 Sorrell, Katherine, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “How UK Scientists Legitimize Religion—and Science—Through Boundary Work,” Sociology of Religion, published online: https://academic.oup.com/socrel/advance-article/doi/10.1093/socrel/sry047/5253740. 2019 Peifer, Jared L., David R. Johnson, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “The Moral Limits of the Market: Science Commercialization and Religious Traditions,” Journal of Business Ethics 157(1):183-197. 2018 Tinsley, Cleve IV, Pamela J. Prickett, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Black Protestant Views of Science,” Du Bois Review 15(2):533-546. 2018 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Christopher P. Scheitle, and Jared Peifer, “The Religiosity of Academic Scientists in the United Kingdom: Assessing the Role of Discipline and Department Status,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 57(4):743-757. 2018 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, and Christopher P. Scheitle, “Scientists” in The Warfare between Science and Religion, The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2018 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, and Di Di, “Global Spirituality Among Scientists” in Being Spiritual but Not Religious: Past, Present, Future(s), edited by William B. Parsons, Routledge. 2018 Scheitle, Christopher P., and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Perceptions of Religious Discrimination among U.S. Scientists,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 57(1):139-155. 2018 Vaidyanathan, Brandon, Simranjit Khalsa, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Naturally Ambivalent: Religion’s Role in Shaping Environmental Action,” Sociology of Religion 79(4):472-494. 2018 Scheitle, Christopher P., David R. Johnson, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Scientists and Religious Leaders Compete for Cultural Authority of Science,” Public Understanding of Science 27(1):57-75. 2018 Johnson, David, Brandon Vaidyanathan, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Structural Strain in Science: Organizational Context, Career Stage, Discipline, and Role Composition,” Sociological Inquiry 88(1):5-31. 2018 Bolger, Daniel, Cleve Tinsley IV, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Heaven and Health: How Black, Latino, and Korean Christians View the Relationship between Faith and Health,” Review of Religious Research 60(3):389-402. 2018 Bolger, Daniel, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Whose Authority? Perceptions of Science Education in Black and Latino Churches,” Review of Religious Research 60(1):49-70. 2018 Johnson, David, Elaine Howard Ecklund, Di Di, and Kirstin Matthews, “Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (Mis)representation of Science,” Public Understanding of Science 27(5):535-549. 4 Elaine Howard Ecklund 2017 Di, Di, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Producing Sacredness and Defending Secularity: Faith in the Workplace of Taiwanese Scientists,”
Recommended publications
  • Religion Among Academic Scientists Questionnaire
    FINAL WEB 5/09/2005Ecklund WEB SURVEY Thank you for participating in this ten-minute web survey sponsored by Rice University. I emphasize that this is a research study and all information you provide is protected by law and will be kept strictly confidential. Your identity and that of your institution will not be disclosed in any findings that are disseminated about the study. If you have questions, or want to confirm the legitimacy of this research, SRBI National Public Policy Research Center can be reached toll-free at 1-800-772-9287. Please ask for study #3472. For concerns about human subjects, the chair of Rice University's Institutional Review Board may be contacted at [email protected]. For any other questions about the study, please email me directly at [email protected]. Thanks again for your participation. Sincerely, Elaine Howard Ecklund Elaine Howard Ecklund, PhD Principal Investigator Religion and Ethics among Academic Scientists (REAS) Postdoctoral Fellow Rice University Sociology Department-MS 28 P.O. Box 1892 Houston, TX 77251-1892 http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~soci/People/ecklund.htm First some questions about your academic career. [IF SAMPLETYPE=1] 1a. Which one of the following best describes your academic rank? [q28, changed categories for MDs] 1) Assistant Professor 2) Associate Professor, with tenure 3) Professor, with tenure 4) Clinical Appointment, please specify__________________ 5) Other, please specify_____________________ 6) No answer [IF SAMPLETYPE=2] 1b Which one of the following best describes your academic rank? [q28] 1 Elaine Howard Ecklund, Ph.D. Rice University FINAL WEB 5/09/2005Ecklund 1) Assistant Professor 2) Associate Professor, with tenure 3) Professor, with tenure 5) Other, please specify__________________ 6) No answer [Qualification Level 1] [IF SAMPLETYPE=1] 2a1.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines Arrests Kuwaiti Terror Suspect, Syrian Wife
    ‘Eagle Resolve’; Chelsea edge Kuwait, US hold towards title; military exercise4 Hazard45 shines Min 20º Max 32º FREE www.kuwaittimes.net NO: 17191 - Friday, April 7, 2017 Philippines arrests Kuwaiti terror suspect, Syrian wife Page 9 MANILA: Kuwaiti national (2nd left) and Syrian national (2nd right) are escorted by National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) personnel after a press conference in Manila yesterday. — AFP Local FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2017 Local Spotlight Local VIEWPOINT No more licenses for expats A Make-up Society: Depression loneliness because they are just too scared to tell the directions at peak times. I also do not know By Sana Kalim truth. And the blinding truth is that: They can’t cope. By Muna Al-Fuzai the objective of enlarging roundabouts They are not strong. The sun doesn’t look like it has without traffic lights to organize traffic flow! [email protected] been lovingly crafted for them just to see them hap- If we want to reduce the number of vehi- py. Sure, there are times where their makeup cakes cles, we should have an alternative, such as off though; these are the times where they say “I do how to develop public transportation, con- [email protected] uwait, this oasis within the hostility of the not want to live”, or “I will say goodbye in a few trol taxis, and build a metro, because we all world, was thought to be the epitome of hap- moments.” Most of the time, these statements are know that taxi services are not fully effective piness. Sadly this is not the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Springs CV
    JASON A. SPRINGS Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies [email protected] Keough School for Global Affairs Cell. 617-233-2765 University of Notre Dame Office: 574-631-0931 305 Hesburgh Center updated: July 2020 Notre Dame, IN 46556 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2020- Professor of Religion, Ethics, and Peace Studies Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies University of Notre Dame 2015-20 Associate Professor of Religion, Ethics, and Peace Studies Director of Doctoral Studies, 2016-18 2008-2015 Assistant Professor of Religion, Ethics, and Peace Studies University of Notre Dame 2006-08 Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Religion, American University (Washington, DC), Dept. of Philosophy and Religion EDUCATION 2005 Ph.D., A.M., Harvard University, Committee on the Study of Religion, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences 2000 MDiv, Princeton Theological Seminary, May 2000, ethics, philosophy of religion 1996 M.A., Baylor University, 1996, Modern philosophy 1995 B.A., Georgetown College, 1995, cum laude, Majors: Philosophy, English Lit FELLOWSHIPS AND GRANTS 2018 Resident Member Fellowship, Center of Theological Inquiry, Princeton, NJ, Fall semester, Seminar on Religion and Violence (declined) 2015-16 The Louisville Institute, Sabbatical Grant for Researchers, Project: Restorative Justice and the New Jim Crow 2005-06 Princeton University, Post-doctoral Fellow in Christian Thought and Practice, Center for the Study of Religion, Princeton, NJ BOOKS In draft Resurrection in Back of the Yards: Restorative Justice and Lived Religion on Chicago’s South and West Sides 2018 Jason A. Springs, Healthy Conflict in Contemporary American Society: From Enemy to Adversary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 2013 Jason A. Springs and Atalia Omer, Religious Nationalism: A Reference Handbook (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio) [equal authorship].
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu Formally Denies Charges in Court
    WWW.JPOST.COM THE Volume LXXXIX, Number 26922 JERUSALEFOUNDED IN 1932 M POSTNIS 13.00 (EILAT NIS 11.00) TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2021 27 SHVAT, 5781 Eye in the sky A joint goal Feminist religious art IAI unveils aerial Amos Yadlin on the need to When God, Jesus surveillance system 6 work with Biden to stop Iran and Allah were women Page 6 Page 9 Page 16 How did we miss Netanyahu formally denies charges in court Judges hint witnesses to be called only after election • PM leaves hearing early the exit • By YONAH JEREMY BOB two to three weeks to review these documents before wit- Prime Minister Benjamin nesses are called, that would ramp? Netanyahu’s defense team easily move the first witness fought with the prosecution beyond March 23. ANALYSIS on Monday at the Jerusalem Judge Rivkah Friedman Feld- • By YONAH JEREMY BOB District Court over calling man echoed the prosecution’s witnesses in his public cor- arguments that the defense A lifetime ago when living ruption trial before the March had between one to two years in northern New Jersey, I 23 election. to prepare for witnesses. But often drove further north for It seemed that the judges ultimately the judges did not work. were leaning toward calling seem anxious to call the first Sometimes the correct exit the first witness in late March witness before March 23. was small and easy to miss. or early April, which they A parallel fight between the But there were around five would present as a compro- sides was the prosecution’s or so exits I could use to avoid mise between the sides.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia University Department of Sociology 307 Knapp Hall Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected]
    CHRISTOPHER P. SCHEITLE West Virginia University Department of Sociology 307 Knapp Hall Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. The Pennsylvania State University, Sociology, August 2008 M.A. The Pennsylvania State University, Sociology, May 2005 B.A. Trinity University, magna cum laude, Sociology and Religion, May 2003 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2020-Current Associate Professor, West Virginia University 2015-2020 Assistant Professor, West Virginia University 2010- 2015 Adjunct Assistant Professor, St. John’s University (MN) 2008-2010 Senior Research Assistant, Penn State University, University Park RESEARCH INTERESTS Religion and Science, Religious Discrimination and Victimization, Religious Organizations, Sexuality, Identity TEACHING INTERESTS Data Analysis and Social Statistics, Research Methods, Sociology of Religion, Wealth and Poverty EXTERNAL FUNDING 2020-2022 Sociology of Science and Religion: Identity and Belief Formation Funding Initiative. $167,797 – Principal Investigator (with Katie E. Corcoran) for “Religion, Science, and the Enchanted Worldview.” 2018-2021 National Science Foundation. $162,254 – Principal Investigator for “Religion and the Professional Development of Graduate Students in the Sciences.” 2018-2020 National Science Foundation. $250,000 – Principal Investigator (with Elaine Howard Ecklund) for “Collaborative Research: Religion Related Bias Victimization: Addressing a Blind-Spot.” 2017-2018 Interfaith Diversity Experiences & Attitudes Longitudinal Survey Research Award. $7,500 – Principal Investigator for “Examining the Worldview Influences of Non-Religious Students.” 2014-2015 National Science Foundation. $299,369 – Principal Investigator (with Jeff Ulmer) for “Collaborative Research: The Frequency and Patterns of Crime Against Religious Congregations.” 2010-2013 National Science Foundation. $286,834 – Principal Investigator (with John McCarthy) for “Nonprofit Religious Organizations and Entrepreneurialism.” 1 2009 Higher Education Research Institute Spirituality in Higher Education Research Award.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Yale University • Department of Sociology • PO Box 208265 • New
    ESTHER D. CHAN Yale University • Department of Sociology • PO Box 208265 • New Haven, CT 06520 [email protected] estherdchan.com October 7, 2019 EDUCATION In Progress Ph.D., Sociology, Yale University (expected May 2020) Social Imaginaries of Diversity: Race, Gender, and Sexuality on an Evangelical University and a Secular University Committee: Philip Gorski (co-chair), Grace Kao (co-chair), Rene Almeling 2017 M.Phil., Sociology, Yale University 2016 M.A., Sociology, Yale University 2012 B.A., Sociology, Summa Cum Laude, University of California, San Diego RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration; Religion; Science and Medicine; Gender and Sexuality; Education; Mixed Methods PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS Forthcoming Chan, Esther. “Does Diversity Include Me? Colorblindness and Racial Triangulation Among Asian Americans on Two College Campuses.” Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2018 Chan, Esther. “Are the Religious Suspicious of Science? Investigating Religiosity, Religious Context, and Orientations Towards Science Cross- Nationally.” Public Understandings of Science 27(8):967-984. 2018 Collins, Stephen C., Soorin Kim, and Esther Chan. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Utilization of Prayer and Clergy Counseling by Infertile US Women Desiring Pregnancy.” Journal of Religion and Health 57(6): 2230–2240. 2017 Collins, Stephen C. and Esther Chan. “Sociocultural Determinants of US Women’s Ethical Views on Various Fertility Treatments.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 35(6):669-677. 2017 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Jared Peifer, Virginia White, and Esther Chan. “Moral Schemas in Articulation and Intuition: How Religious People Evaluate Human Reproductive Genetic Technologies.” Sociological Forum 32(2):277-297. 1 2016 Chan, Esther and Elaine Howard Ecklund. “Narrating and Navigating Authorities: Evangelical and Mainline Protestant Interpretations of the Bible and Science.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55(1):54-69.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Links Between Religion, Evolution Views, and Climate
    EABXXX10.1177/0013916516674246Environment and BehaviorEcklund et al. 674246research-article2016 Article Environment and Behavior 1 –22 Examining Links Between © 2016 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: Religion, Evolution sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0013916516674246 Views, and Climate eab.sagepub.com Change Skepticism Elaine Howard Ecklund1, Christopher P. Scheitle2, Jared Peifer3, and Daniel Bolger1 Abstract Recent media portrayals link climate change skepticism to evolution skepticism, often as part of a larger “antiscience” tendency related to membership in conservative religious groups. Using national survey data, we examine the link between evolution skepticism and climate change skepticism, and consider religion’s association with both. Our analysis shows a modest association between the two forms of skepticism along with some shared predictors, such as political conservatism, a lack of confidence in science, and lower levels of education. Evangelical Protestants also show more skepticism toward both evolution and climate change compared with the religiously unaffiliated. On the whole, however, religion has a much stronger and clearer association with evolution skepticism than with climate change skepticism. Results contribute to scholarly discussions on how different science issues may or may not interact, the role of religion in shaping perceptions of science, and how science policy makers might better channel their efforts to address environmental care and climate change in particular. 1Rice University, Houston, TX, USA 2West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA 3Baruch College, New York, NY, USA Corresponding Author: Elaine Howard Ecklund, Department of Sociology, Rice University MS-28, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77006, USA. Email: [email protected] Downloaded from eab.sagepub.com by guest on November 2, 2016 2 Environment and Behavior Keywords climate change, evolution, religion, evangelicals, skepticism Skepticism toward scientific claims is not a new phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC CHANNEL Program Schedule July(Easiness)
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC CHANNEL Program Schedule July(easiness) MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN 6.13.20.27 7.14.21.28 1.8.15.22.29 2.9.16.23.30 3.10.17.24.31 4.11.18.25 5.12.19.26 Supercars/Technology(1st~3rd) Megafactories、Top Gear USA Season3、Strippers: Cars For Cash 400 400 NATGEO WILD HOUR(6th~21st、30th、31st) Witness Disaster Animal Genius、Superpride、Animal Fight Club、Ninja Shrimp、Return of The Clouded Leopards、Speed Kills、 →Next Megaquake(11th ~6:00) Search For The Giant Octopus、Sixgill Shark: Into the Abyss、Humpbacks: Cracking The Code、Sloth Bears →Megafactories →Car SOS PADI presents Marine Week(22nd~28th) 430 Secrets of The Mediterranean、Sharks of Lost Island、One Ocean、Seas Strangest Square Mile、Fur Seals: Battle For Survival 430 Military Hour Zeb's River Journey Taiwan's Frog Men →Bugging Hitler's Army 500 500 Inside: Talibanistan、 Storm Worlds、 Top Gear Season2 Seconds From Disaster 5、 Seconds From Disaster VI、 THE BORDER、 Witness: Disaster In Japan War Generals、 Inside Combat Rescue Convoy: War For The Atlantic Nazi Death Camp: →Car SOS The Man Who Saved The World The Great Escape 530 530 600 information 600 Brain Games 4、 Science of Stupid、 Do Or Die、 630 Hacking The System Do Or Die、 Grand Mama's Boy 630 Brain Games 2 None of The Above Season 2 Danger Decoded Car Sos III Top Gear Season2 →Top Gear USA Season4 700 700 Is it Real?、Scam City、UFOs: The Untold Stories2 、Invasion Earth Entertain Your Brain Special Hacking The System[Restaurant Ruses] 730 /Hacking The System[Travel Tricks] 730 /Hacking The System[Holiday Hacks] /Hacking The System[Survival Hacks] Highway Thru Hell 2 Entertain Your Brain Special Brain Games 4 [Peer Pressure] 800 /Do Or Die[Killer Tsunami!] 800 /Do Or Die[Fire In The Sky] Wingsuit Daredevil、 NATGEO WILD HOUR(1st) NATGEO WILD HOUR(2nd) NATGEO WILD HOUR(3rd) /Danger Decoded[#1] Inside Maritime Singapore、 Animals Gone Wild Animal Genius Animal Genius Inside: The Shanghai Bund、 Don't Tell My Mother 4 The Lost Diary of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee
    ESTHER D. CHAN [email protected] estherdchan.com August 12, 2020 EMPLOYMENT 2020 - Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee 2020 - Non-Resident Research Fellow, Religion and Public Life Program, Rice University EDUCATION 2020 Ph.D., Sociology, Yale University Social Imaginaries of Diversity: Race, Gender, and Sexuality on an Evangelical University and a Secular University Committee: Philip Gorski (co-chair), Grace Kao (co-chair), Rene Almeling 2017 M.Phil., Sociology, Yale University 2016 M.A., Sociology, Yale University 2012 B.A., Sociology, Summa Cum Laude, University of California, San Diego RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration; Religion; Science and Medicine; Gender and Sexuality; Mixed Methods PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS Forthcoming Chan, Esther. “Does Diversity Include Me? Colorblindness and Racial Triangulation Among Asian Americans on Two College Campuses.” Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2018 Chan, Esther. “Are the Religious Suspicious of Science? Investigating Religiosity, Religious Context, and Orientations Towards Science Cross- Nationally.” Public Understandings of Science 27(8):967-984. 2018 Collins, Stephen C., Soorin Kim, and Esther Chan. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Utilization of Prayer and Clergy Counseling by Infertile US Women Desiring Pregnancy.” Journal of Religion and Health 57(6): 2230–2240. 2017 Collins, Stephen C. and Esther Chan. “Sociocultural Determinants of US Women’s Ethical Views on Various Fertility Treatments.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 35(6):669-677. 1 2017 Ecklund, Elaine Howard, Jared Peifer, Virginia White, and Esther Chan. “Moral Schemas in Articulation and Intuition: How Religious People Evaluate Human Reproductive Genetic Technologies.” Sociological Forum 32(2):277-297. 2016 Chan, Esther and Elaine Howard Ecklund.
    [Show full text]
  • Science of Stupid
    Forces Science of Stupid We are going to watch a clip from National Geographic, Science of Stupid, where we will see how gravity, resistance, and gradient affect acceleration. Task: as we watch, complete the True or False activity. If false, right the correct answer below in the space provided. True / False 1. Wheels build up speed when going downhill due to gravitational acceleration. 2. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ True / False Wheels have low rolling resistance, meaning that they do not pose much opposition to gravity’s pull. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ True / False 3. The steeper the hill, the smaller the acceleration. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ True / False 4. To stay balanced, you must keep your centre of mass above the narrow base of support (i.e. the wheels) - if you move your centre of mass outside of the base of support, you will become unbalanced. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ True / False 5. A sudden hit of resistance will make you slow down gradually. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ True / False 6. A wider base of support and a lower centre of mass makes something less stable. ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Forces Science of Stupid We are going to watch a clip from National Geographic, Science of Stupid, where we will see how gravity, resistance, and gradient affect acceleration. Answers 1. Wheels build up speed when going downhill due to gravitational acceleration. 2. Wheels have low rolling resistance, meaning that they do not pose much opposition to gravity’s pull. 3. The steeper the hill, the greater the acceleration. 4. To stay balanced, you must keep your centre of mass above the base of support (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • “Science Vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think” Dr. Elaine Howard Ecklund and Barbara Bradley Hagerty  November 2010 Conversations
    ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think” Dr. Elaine Howard Ecklund Rice University Barbara Bradley Hagerty NPR November 2010 MICHAEL CROMARTIE: Professor Elaine Howard Ecklund has written this new book called Science v. Religion: What Scientists Really Think, which is a wonderfully unique take on the question because we usually read subjects on what religious people think about science. We are delighted to have Dr. Ecklund here this morning. We’re also delighted that Barbara Bradley Hagerty could be here because Barbara has written a New York Times best selling book on religion and spirituality and science. So it’s wonderful to have you both here. DR. ELAINE HOWARD ECKLUND: There’s the perception out there that scientists are completely “areligious” and that they’re even beyond being “areligious.” They are against religion completely, right? I’m a sociologist, and I think sociology at its best often gives us research that’s very deeply surprising and sort of challenges our worldviews and dispels common myths that we believe about ourselves and the world around us. My most recent research is on religion, spirituality and ethics among scientists, research I’ve been working on for the past five years, where I’ve surveyed 2,500 natural and social scientists at the top U.S. research universities, and I’ve achieved a 75 percent response to the initial survey I did, which is very high for survey research. I surveyed them at places like Harvard University, University of Chicago, top state schools like Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and I also followed up by having a lot of face-to-face ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “Science vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Religion in (Global) Public Life: a Sociological
    Science and Religion in (Global) Public Life: A Sociological Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/89/2/672/6299230 by guest on 25 September 2021 Perspective Elaine Howard Ecklund* FOR the last fifteen years, I have devoted my life as a sociologist to understanding what scientists and religious people around the globe think about the interface between science and religion.1 I have done so because both religion and science are enormously significant in our social world. Over 5.8 billion individuals identify as religious—this accounts for nearly 85 percent of the global population—and many of those who do not identify as religious think of themselves as possessing some form of spirituality (Pew Research Center 2012; Ecklund and Di Di 2018).2 Religious institutions remain among the most significant ones in the world (Jurgensmeyer 2010; Prothero 2010). Religious belonging and iden- tity shape families and friendships (Edgell 2006; Olson 2019), influence law and politics (Bonikowski and DiMaggio 2016), and provide existen- tial security to people on every continent and across different eras (Berger 1990; Grillo 2011). Science is similarly significant. Over the past two centuries, medical and nutritional advances have nearly doubled the average human life span, more so in some societies than others (Roser 2019). Among Organization *Elaine Howard Ecklund, Religion and Public Life Program, Department of Sociology, Rice University, 6100 Main Street MS-28, Houston TX, 77005, USA. Email: [email protected]. This paper is based on a Gifford Lecture given in 2018 at the University of Edinburgh. The author gratefully ac- knowledges Rachel Schneider, the editor of the Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Andrea Jain, and the reviewers for helpful feedback on this paper.
    [Show full text]